File:NLC511-023031103090551-56718 司法雜誌 第6卷.pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file (4,197 × 5,845 pixels, file size: 12.44 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 92 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
司法雜誌   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
最高法院東北分院司法雜誌編輯處
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
司法雜誌
Volume 第6卷
Edition 遼寧省圖書館 2011年3月
Publisher
最高法院東北分院會計科
Description

《司法雜誌》第十三期目錄
東北政務委員會暨東三省政府宣言詳述對俄經過情形
蘇聯宣傳共產文證撮要
不完全履行之概念
第十次國際刑務會議之議題
日本民事判例批評
佃農保護法;十六年五月十日武漢國民政府公布
官吏恤金條例;十六年九月九日前南京國民政府公布
官吏恤金條例施行細則;十六年四月四日國民政府指令第六五三號核准內政部公布
註冊條例;十六年十一月十九日國民政府公布
特准探採煤油礦暫行條例;十七年八月二十三日農礦部公布
司法院快郵代電院字第六一號十八年四月十日;懲治盜匪條例第十條第二條及第三條第一第三兩款均適用於懲治綁匪條例但關於未逐罪之科刑應依懲治綁匪條例第二條辦理(刑事)
司法院訓令院字第六二號十八年四月二十二日;關於告訴乃論之罪無合法告訴而已違法起訴判決時之疑義(刑事)
司法院快郵代電院字第六三號十八年四月二十二日;移轉或指定法院之管轄不限於起訴以後又檢察事務雖經移於別廳但偵查終結如原法院有管轄權仍應起訴於原法院(其他)
司法院快郵代電院字第六四號十八年四月二十九日;在懲治綁匪條例施行前懲治盜匪條例施行後所生擄人勒贖案件已經第一審判決現系屬上訴審或復判審者仍應適用懲治盜匪條例(刑事)
司法院快郵代電院字第六五號十八年四月二十九日;犯罪在懲治綁匪條件頒行前裁判在該條例頒行事應依盜匪案件適用法律暫行細則第一第第一款之規定適用懲治綁匪條例(刑事)
司法院快郵代電院字第六六號十八年四月三十日;關於懲治綁匪條例適用之疑義(刑事)
司法院快郵代電院字第七六號十八年四月三十日;應沒收之物於案已送審時在判決內並予宣告若案未起訴或不起訴則由檢察官聲請法院以裁定沒收之(刑事)
司法院訓令院字第六八號十八年四月三十日;關於綁匪案件適用法律之疑義二則(刑事)
司法院訓令院字第六九號十八年四月三十日;關於妨害公務致人傷害適用法律之疑義(刑事)
司法院訓令院字第七十號十八年四月三十日;上告利益僅滿二百元者仍不得上告又上告利益不得將附帶請求之利息合併計算(民事)
司法院咨院字第七一號十八年五月三日;關於處理勞資爭議適用法律之疑義(其他)
司法院快郵代電院字第七二號十八年五月三日;水利涉訟之訴訟價額應以原告一年內因該訴訟可望增加之收益為準(民事)
司法院快郵代電院字第七三號十八年五月三日;審理煙案簡易程序第八條非強制規定未經此種程序不能即指為違法(其他)
司法院訓令院字第七四號十八年五月三日;值人故意犯罪之際而有過失這事實如依法應論過失罪自應認為獨立之過失犯(刑事)
司法院訓令院字第七五號十八年五月三日;當事人不服佃業理事局權限以外之促裁裁斷向法院起訴自應受理(其他)
司法院訓令院字第七六號十八年五月三日;關於印花稅暫行條例之疑義(其他)
司法院快郵代電院字第七七號十八年五月三日;關於適用印花稅暫行條例之疑問四則(其他)
司法院訓令院字第七八號十八年五月三日;和誘已滿二十歲之婦女僅系單純和誘或賣與人為妻者依新刑法不為罪但如合於刑法第二四六條規定者應依該條論科(刑事)
司法院指令院第字第七九號十八年五月四日;父浪費因准禁治產之實體法現無明文規定自不得向法院聲請宣告(民事)
司法院訓令院字第八十號十八年五月四日;罰金判決未定易科監禁之期間如不能執行罰金應由檢查官聲明同級法院依刑法五五條三項前半規定裁定之(刑事)
簽呈政務委員會為請將本院檢察處依照中央新制改組
復吉林高等法院公函為解釋因賬款關係吞服鴉片煙自殺應如何處分由
最高法院東北分院民事第三審判決十八年上字第六五六號
最高法院東北分院民事第三審判決十八年上字第七一五號
最高法院東北分院刑事判決判字第四十二號
禁煙法;立法院第三十一次常會通過
民法債篇立法原則;六月五日中政會議決一
最高法院東北分院布告為奉政務委員會訓令自七月一日起本院法收按現洋一元折收奉大洋五十元
本院負責籌備中之同澤新民儲材館司法班已開始招考
本院各庭自開院以來結案數目
遼寧司法收入一律按現洋核收奉票
撤銷上海租界臨時法院之來往照會
王寵惠在歐發表撤消領事裁判權宣言
司法行政部籌設各省新監計劃
立法院起草中之民法債篇目次

Language Chinese
Source
institution QS:P195,Q732353
(民國文獻)

Licensing

[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain
This image is now in the public domain in China because its term of copyright has expired.

According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China (with legal jurisdiction in the mainland only, excluding Hong Kong and Macao), amended November 11, 2020, Works of legal persons or organizations without legal personality, or service works, or audiovisual works, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation. For photography works of natural persons whose copyright protection period expires before June 1, 2021 belong to the public domain. All other works of natural persons enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.
According to copyright laws of Republic of China (currently with jurisdiction in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, etc.), all photographs and cinematographic works, and all works whose copyright holder is a juristic person, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation, and all other applicable works enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.

Important note: Works of foreign (non-U.S.) origin must be out of copyright or freely licensed in both their home country and the United States in order to be accepted on Commons. Works of Chinese origin that have entered the public domain in the U.S. due to certain circumstances (such as publication in noncompliance with U.S. copyright formalities) may have had their U.S. copyright restored under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) if the work was under copyright in its country of origin on the date that the URAA took effect in that country. (For the People's Republic of China, the URAA took effect on January 1, 1996. For the Republic of China (ROC), the URAA took effect on January 1, 2002.[1])
To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it or held its copyright.

You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

čeština  Deutsch  English  português  română  slovenščina  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  македонски  русский  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文  +/−



This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current04:23, 26 April 2023Thumbnail for version as of 04:23, 26 April 20234,197 × 5,845, 92 pages (12.44 MB)PencakeBot (talk | contribs)Upload 司法雜誌 第6卷 (6/49) by 最高法院東北分院司法雜誌編輯處 (batch task; nlc:data_511,023031103090551,56718; 民國文獻-PD2022.2; 司法雜誌)

Metadata