Commons talk:Adiutor/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 โ |
Bugs
@Vikipolimer: thx for the great tool!
some bugs:
- the top banner on user pages has wrong links, using Vikipedi instead of commons. i think the bug is MediaWiki:Gadget-Adiutor-UPW.js#L-40.
- MediaWiki:Gadget-Adiutor-SUM.js#L-22 "WikiProject blahblah" are not a thing on commons. other summaries can also be adjusted to fit better with commons.
--RZuo (talk) 10:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- @RZuo, thank you for your valuable feedback. The first bug has been resolved, but we need to prepare for addressing the second one. Do you have any alternative suggestions for a common summary that we could use in place of the existing one? ๐ฉ๐ถ๐ธ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ โฃ 13:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- i see that under "var summaryCategories" you have 4 cats: general, article, nonArticle and talkPage.
- on commons the equivalent of "article" aka (main) ns is called (gallery), but most users' most edits are not in this ns, but in file.
- so if we preserve 4 cats, i think for commons it would be "general, file, nonFile and talkPage".
- as for what could be some of the most common summaries, i think it's better to survey on com:vp.
- i think your existing ones are ok, just not exactly aligned to commons. WikiProject stuff has to be removed because commons doesnt have this. i think the most common use of talkpage is actually the same as what you have in nonArticle: 'Reply', 'Comment', 'Suggestion'. RZuo (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- i would reduce it to 3 cats: general, file, nonFile. and change nonFile to 'Reply', 'Suggestion', 'Update', 'Fix'.
- update and fix are common types of edits to commons/template/module/help/... ns.
- reply and comment are almost the same thing? there must be something present to comment on, aka reply? RZuo (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Requesting speedy deletion of CSD log caused weirdness
This is a very nicely-presented tool, but I seem to have found at least one bug in my second use of it. I visited User:Bjh21/CSD Log and decided I didn't need it, so I:
- Chose "Adiutor options", turned off both "Maintain a log of speedy deletion requests." and "Maintain a log of the pages I nominate AfD.", and clicked "Update".
- Then chose "Speedy deletion request" and selected "U1 - User requested deletion in own user space" to request deletion of the CSD log.
The result is three edits to the page: the first added the {{SD}} template, which is what I expected. The second edit removed the {{SD}} template and also wrote a log entry even though I thought I'd turned that off. The third edit added a second copy of the log entry with a new heading. Curiously, the second and third edits have different edit summaries and one of them is lacking the "Adiutor" tag. None of this is very serious but it is a bit odd. I'll leave the page around for a while in case its history is useful to you. --bjh21 (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Bjh21 thanks for feedback, I'll check it asap. ๐ฉ๐ถ๐ธ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ โฃ 14:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio check
commons dont usually deal with text copyvio, so this button is now rather useless. should either remove it or change it to check reverse image search results. RZuo (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)