Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Smpl02a

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Smpl02a}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Smpl02a

Status: open • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 16:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Smpl02a (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected Related Users

• Smpl02 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Smpl15 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Smpl01c (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Rationale

• Reason: Re-uploaded school photos (Image:1788.jpg, Image:2234.jpg). Image:1788.jpg was voted for deletion already. EugeneZelenko 16:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Results

• Which one of these is the sockmaster? Based on looking at the logs I think you may have the wrong one listed first. Also, based on contribs I think the sockdom is fairly obvious, I'd block for that. I won't decline just yet in case I am missing something here but I haven't run a check because I'm not seeing the need for one (remember, CU is a last resort, and is not needed for obvious cases) However, if I'm confused please advise. Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 17:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

If you think that case is obvious, please block sock account. Sorry, I don't have enough expirience with such problems... --EugeneZelenko 14:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment From Commons:Deletion_requests/Private_scouting_and_school_images_(2007-04-04):

• Beeyan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Djama (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Jabbar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Mappase (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Smpl02 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Smpl03 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Smpl06 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Smpl09 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

• Additionally, I ran a query trough the user creation log:

+---------+-----------+-------------------+----------------+
| user_id | user_name | user_registration | user_editcount |
+---------+-----------+-------------------+----------------+
|  124065 | Smpl05    | 20070302023250    |             20 |
|  124394 | Smpl03    | 20070302233857    |              5 |
|  126061 | Smpl01    | 20070306225643    |              0 |
|  126503 | Smpl09    | 20070307235020    |             24 |
|  126885 | Smpl06    | 20070308233859    |              2 |
|  133967 | Smpl02    | 20070327000112    |             27 |
|  139228 | Smpl11    | 20070409144258    |              0 |
|  147897 | Smpl04    | 20070501033417    |              0 |
|  163685 | Smpl15    | 20070611015423    |              1 |
|  163688 | Smpl02a   | 20070611020721    |              1 |
|  163693 | Smpl01c   | 20070611021952    |              0 |
+---------+-----------+-------------------+----------------+

• I don't think we need CheckUser to establish that those are all one and the same person who have solely created an account to spam Commons. I feel like blocking them all. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • ABSOLUTELY! Block the lot of them and set block account creation on, as well as perhaps block subsequent IPs this account edits from... Checkuser is not needed. Good sleuthing. ++Lar: t/c 22:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.