Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Leitoxx

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Leitoxx}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Leitoxx

Status: open • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 15:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

• Leitoxx (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected related users

• Caro Scheilegers :) (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Teamomiredhotchilipepperiano (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Priscila guerrero solis (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Rationale

• Reason: Leitoxx and Caro Scheilegers :) are already blocked for vandalism, it seems the accounts are related: [1], [2], [3] and Special:Undelete/File:Banano De Lado.JPG.  ■ MMXX ^talk 15:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Results

• Thanks, good call. The top account is stale from a CU perspective however there are enough other accounts to be dealing with for now. Two indef blocked and looking at the other ones next. Thanks again --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Wandered around with the broom a bit. Might just be "school" type accounts or similar. Equally might be some sleepers but without edits impossible to be sure. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry to write here. Related to Priscila, this is vandalism since she replaced an UP adding an unaceptable summary ("tu poto" in spanish is a nothing fashion way to say "your ass"). Thanks. --Andrea (talk) 14:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment On his talk page, responding to fellow-administrator's User:Dcoetzee's inquiry concerning the block of User:Carliitaeliza, administrator/checkuser User:Herbythyme has pointed to this section. But a) User:Carliitaeliza is not listed here as a related username, and b) the user herself vehemently denies socking, claiming not to know any of these users, and also claims that she is editing from a dynamic IP in Santiago, Chile. She also says she has ip-block-exempt status on en wiki for this reason. So. Could we review this a little more closely? --Mareklug ^talk 16:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Yep - I've asked a fellow CU to review this. There are quite a number of users on a small number of IPs - some are certainly puppets. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Following a request of Herby I re-checked it. The accounts were active on a small range and while some were related, others definitely weren't. I know Carliitaeliza is/was locked or blocked on other projects, but it seems that he's Unrelated to the accounts mentioned here. The technical evidence doesn't match and his edit pattern doesn't match either. The range is a dynamic mobile range from Chile, so it's very likely there is some collateral. Anyway, I unblocked Carliitaeliza - someone should look at the results more thoroughly to see which accounts matches and which not. (@Herby, could you do that maybe?) Trijnstel_talk 20:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.