Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amanbir Singh
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Amanbir Singh
[edit]- Amanbir Singh (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Esvita (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Amanbir Singh Grewal (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Amanbir IV (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Amanbir II (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Amanbir Singh (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Amanbir Singh Grewal,NHH (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]See en:w:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mokshanine, the pattern is obvious.
Esvita: At Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Akal.jpg signs is post "Amanbir Singh Grewal". Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked based on crosswiki CU data. Lock evasion, block evasion, etc. going on here - taking some to SRG for glock. ~riley (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Declined: 1) All but Amanbir IV are Stale; there would be nothing to which to compare that account; 2) no evidence of disruption on Commons presented (COM:RFCU); and 3) also per COM:RFCU: "Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first." Accounts whose connections have already been established on sister projects and/or are "obvious" no not require a new check. Эlcobbola talk 19:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.