Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 03 2020

• 
  • Nomination Coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 00:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Military motorcycle with sidecar BMW R 75 built from 1941 to 1944 -- Spurzem 18:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and a happy new year! --Palauenc05 18:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• * Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote, Potsdam (1921). --Palauenc05 17:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote, Potsdam (1921). --Palauenc05 17:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Philomena by J.D. Mahlknecht in the Saint-Germain l'Auxerrois church. --Moroder 17:22, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crown Inn, Gonten, canton of Appenzell, Switzerland. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:27, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 16:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Patrulla Águila, ILA 2018 --MB-one 15:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 16:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An overview of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building in Cotonou, Benin --Adoscam 12:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Low quality. You read the Image guidelines please? --A.Savin 14:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The shaft of the Bismarck tower in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The top area looks awkward, I get dizzy looking at it, did it undergo some kind of editing? --Poco a poco 12:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
     Info Sorry, I don't have better pictures :(. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
    Indeed, the top is not sharp, a higher f-value probably would have given a much better photo --Michielverbeek 14:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palais Hartleben, Braunfels, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Lubentius church, Dietkirchen, seen from a nearby orchard. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Runkel castle with old bridge over river Lahn. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of Cadjéhoun-Cotonou district in Benin seen from the eighth floor of a building --Adoscam 10:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality and obviously tilted. --A.Savin 14:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall square, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 08:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, nice picture! --PantheraLeo1359531 11:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone Bridge, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia --Poco a poco 08:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone Bridge, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia --Poco a poco 08:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also good IMHO. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port, Ålesund, Norway --Poco a poco 08:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality and beautiful! --Tournasol7 08:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination the tabernacle inside the Ste Cécile de Cotonou Catholic church in Benin --Adoscam 08:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, artifacts, unfortunate crop and perspective correction needed. --Palauenc05 18:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential house in Friesenhausen --Ermell 08:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Viewpoint Frauenstein near Trainmeusel in the Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 08:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ponsse elk forwarder unloading logs in the Bruderwald in Bamberg --Ermell 08:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 356 1957 at the 5th International Oldtimer and Classic Rallye Rudolf Caracciola 2019 in Bamberg --Ermell 08:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Dead birch on a hill that is overgrown with heather.
    --Famberhorst 07:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Prasüras, through the Val Trupchun to Alp Purcher in the Swiss National Park. Bridge over the Ova da Varusch.
    --Famberhorst 07:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination eggs of lesser spotted eagle - Oeufs de Aigle pomarin --Ercé 06:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
    --Famberhorst 07:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. Wall decoration in a residential house in S-charl.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Suspension bridge between Val Sinestra and Zuort.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. House on Plaz in Vnà.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory and cemetery on Oberer Kirchenweg #9 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Late baroque portal of the rectory on Oberer Kirchenweg #9 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tabernacle wayside shrine on Oberer Kirchenweg in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nave of the parish church Queen of the Rosary on Oberer Kirchenweg 10 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal at the porch of the parish church Queen of the Rosary on Oberer Kirchenweg 10 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kuniya Walk near Mutitjulu Waterhole at Uluru (Ayers Rock) in Uluṟu-Kata Tjuṯa National Park, Petermann Ranges, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 03:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opera House, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia --XRay 03:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forum Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia --XRay 03:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stokes Hill Wharf in Darwin, Northern Territory, AustraliaEnglish: Stokes Hill Wharf in Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 03:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ATX Computer cases, back view. --Dmitry Makeev 20:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good for me, thanks for the annotations :) --PantheraLeo1359531 12:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USSR lens. Industar I 96 U. USSR lens. --Dmitry Makeev 15:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculture at Museo Naval Mexico, Veracruz --Cvmontuy 12:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Dust spot in the building on the left side, please fix it. --Armenak Margarian 19:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Done --Cvmontuy 21:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Now is good, thank you. --Armenak Margarian 12:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Museo Ferroviario, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile --Carlos yo 21:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Estación Meteorológica de Quinta Normal, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile --Carlos yo 21:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Estadio de la Usach, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile --Carlos yo 21:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Quinta da Regaleira, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 15:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dnister River in Ukraine. By User:Zysko serhii --Anntinomy 09:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Southern view of the exterior of Stiftskirche Admont --Domob 17:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Left verticals are not --Cvmontuy 04:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment The left side of the "lowest block" is in fact vertical. The other lines are as good as I was able to get the perspective. Whether or not that is QI is your call. --Domob 08:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Left verticals --Cvmontuy 22:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A section of a former train station in Hof, Saale. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment In general good quality, but I don't like the asymmetric crop. Can you try to crop more on the left? --Domob 18:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done Of course, here you go :) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Thanks! --Domob 13:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Hütte_an_der_FFW_Hof_20191212.jpg

• Nomination: A cabin near a fire department in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
• Review
•  Comment Dome dust spots to remove. --Steindy 20:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks for the review, dust spots removed. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:07, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Disagree. Overexposed sky. --A.Savin 20:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin.--Peulle 15:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - The brightness on my screen is 100%. I'm not overly bothered by the sky, nor by the dark parts of the building to the left, because I think they're acceptable in order to get this view of a firehouse. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Pinchgut_Hut_-_interior,_Mount_Thomas_Forest_Conservation_Area,_New_Zealand_07.jpg

• Nomination Pinchgut Hut, New Zealand --Podzemnik 01:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. In some areas outblown. --Steindy 00:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Very good. Some blown out light at the top of the door is no big deal in context. -- Ikan Kekek 08:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

 Question Really Ikan? Didn't you see the mattresses left and right? Did you look at the photo at all or do you judge by the name? --Steindy 21:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Nah, I don't judge by name, and that's a pretty nasty accusation. Dialing down the brightest highlights would be a good idea, but it didn't bother me all that much. But Podzemnik could probably solve the problem easily. -- Ikan Kekek 03:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

On further consideration, I've removed my supporting vote for now. I'd like to see the mattress be a little less bright, too. -- Ikan Kekek 05:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek Sorry I didn't sort it out as I was away on holidays. The mattress is covered in plastic, reflecting the direct sun. I won't be able to fix that now. --Podzemnik 03:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Smial Steindy. Mattress too. --Milseburg 11:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

I did not vote. --Smial 18:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC) Sorry, I mean Steindy. --Milseburg 20:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Agree Ikan. And good enough for QI.Seven Pandas 23:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hate to say it, but the mattress ruins it for me.--Tobias ToMar Maier 17:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

* Support Seven Pandas 22:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

• You have one vote. -- Ikan Kekek 03:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Vorderseite_Gebäude_Jens_Bretschneider_Internationale_und_Handelsagentur_GmbH_20191208_003.jpg

• Nomination: A façade of a building in Saxony, Germany at twilight --PantheraLeo1359531 15:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
• Review
  Perspective issues --Podzemnik 16:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
   Done New version uploaded --PantheraLeo1359531 13:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Support Looks good now. --Stoxastikos 16:35, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I thinj it's too dark. Please discuss --Podzemnik 04:33, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I agree. -- Ikan Kekek 06:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Done Brighter image added --PantheraLeo1359531 11:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support now. -- Ikan Kekek 19:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sometimes I don't understand reviewer's demands. The new version has now clipped and washed-out highlights, and the sky's evening blue has changed to something like cyan, because the blue colour channel is near clipping. Simply brightening didn't work. --Smial 19:06, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - Yeah, you're right about cyan. Support vote removed. -- Ikan Kekek 23:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Excessive NR and I also find those cars in front a bit disturbing.--Peulle 15:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Doesn't look so good after brightening. Why was it necessary? It looked like a perfectly normal night shot with acceptable noise level. Support vote removed. --Stoxastikos (talk) 17:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

 Done Reverted to older version. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support OK, support returned ;-) I see no crushed shadows here, nor any important details that would be too dark to see. The scene is partially dark, all right, but what would one expect in the nighttime? And it should be noticed also that the cars in front have become less prominent and the noise has virtually disappeared. --Stoxastikos (talk) 19:48, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Ausgleichs-Pro. -- Smial 15:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Lower part too dark, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 05:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment But is it unnaturally dark, considering the time of day? --Stoxastikos 16:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Is that really the question? If that were the only question, should a night picture be pitch black? No. A longer exposure would be used. I don't know what the solution is in this situation. -- Ikan Kekek 16:59, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Well, the solution is pretty simple, actually: to brighten up the lower part of the picture and leave alone the sky and everything else. But it would look unnatural - that's my point. --Stoxastikos 17:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Have you looked at User:Ermell's photos of Christmas markets below buildings? How does he do it? -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

The street on Ermell's image is lit by the street-lamps, as well as the facade of the building. Not much light, but it's evenly spread over the lit surfaces, more or less. But have you noticed how dark is the roof there? Some of the figures on the roof are almost lost. And how totally dark is the lawn in the foreground? In this picture the facade is lit by the last remains of the daylight falling from the sky, which is still way stronger than any artificial illumination. The camera has no dynamic range to even it up. HDR may have been an option, but why? There is nothing very interesting in the foreground anyway and the deep shadows are only natural here in my opinion. --Stoxastikos 13:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

OK, I'll cross out my opposing vote and let others decide. -- Ikan Kekek 15:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)