Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 18 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Plaque at the federal gymnasium in Tanzenberg #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Federal gymnasium in Tanzenberg #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief of Christ in Majesty at the south wall of the federal gymnasium in Tanzenberg #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Federal gymnasium in Tanzenberg #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bernhard Fucik, player of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A coastal cityscape of Las Rocas in evening, Torrevieja, Spain --Ximonic 22:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church St. Martin in Hechenwang from close distance. --DavidJRasp 16:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 19:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View on the Gasteig from the direction of the Ludwigsbrücke with a lot of traffic. --DavidJRasp 16:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Black Stone(Jablanica Mountain), toward Galichica --Liridon 10:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment A quick tip: try lowering the ISO setting from 400 to 100 next time. It will reduce the noise quite much, because you probably don't need that much ISO in clear daylight. --Ximonic 22:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Picket post at the divide between the 4th and the 5th pickets of the 108th km of the Artsyz – Izmail Line --VileGecko 09:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. The coordinates would be nice. --Steindy 14:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Done Coordinates added. --VileGecko 15:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Crafter (2nd Gen) of the Emergency Gas Service in Izmail --VileGecko 09:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.Good quality. The coordinates would be nice. --Steindy 14:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Done Coordinates added. --VileGecko 15:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Tokyo Skytree in November 2018 in Tokyo, Japan. --Balon Greyjoy 09:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Liridon 10:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Children's Peace Monument in Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park. --Balon Greyjoy 09:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --VileGecko 10:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An ASM-135 ASAT on display at the National Air and Space Museum Udvar-Hazy Center. --Balon Greyjoy 09:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --VileGecko 10:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A model of a TDRS satellite on display at the National Air and Space Museum Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center. --Balon Greyjoy 09:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A statue at Hiroshima Castle. --Balon Greyjoy 09:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hattem, Moored boats for clog sailing.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Hattem, Moored boats for clog sailing.
-
- Nomination Glavni trg 9 in Celje, Styria, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glavni trg in Celje, Styria, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Julian Alps seen from Vršič Pass, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms on the gatepost of the outer bailey of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roof decorations of the Bauhaus in the outer bailey of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gable of the Annex of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lintel of the Bauhaus Gate of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest at the street “Am Linnert”, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (11)--Maksimsokolov 02:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (12)--Maksimsokolov 02:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (14)--Maksimsokolov 02:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marco Sahanek, player of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marco Sahanek, player of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomáš Dočekal, player of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscaped fields near Kalaw, Shan Hills, Myanmar. --Argenberg 17:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 15:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The 1853 fountain in Metaxourgeio square, Athens. --C messier 11:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 15:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ural- 375D chassis-cab at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten --~~~~
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Darter_Preening_Neck_Vedanthangal_TN_Feb22_D72_22956.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Darter or Snake-bird (Anhinga melanogaster) preening neck, Vedanthangal Bird Sanctuary, India --Tagooty 09:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp. --Tomer T 11:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Fairly low resolution, artefacts, level of detail...--Peulle 08:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Darter_Head_Bent_Back_Vedanthangal_TN_Feb22_D72_22958.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Darter or Snake-bird (Anhinga melanogaster) head bent back, Vedanthangal Bird Sanctuary, India --Tagooty 09:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp. --Tomer T 11:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that with this fairly low resolution, this isn't the level of quality we expect in 2022. There are artefacts, a low level of detail... --Peulle 08:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Darter_Perched_Vedanthangal_TN_Feb22_D72_22961.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Darter or Snake-bird (Anhinga melanogaster) perched, Vedanthangal Bird Sanctuary, India --Tagooty 09:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp. --Tomer T 11:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that with this fairly low resolution, this isn't the level of quality we expect in 2022. There are artefacts and a general lack of details.--Peulle 08:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Leh_Palace_Landscape.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Leh Palace. By User:Shri 4545 --Hulged 03:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp. --Tomer T 11:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavy perspective warp. Both sides are leaning in.--Peulle 08:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Krumpendorf_Pamperlallee_O-Ansicht_03022022_2101.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Pamperlallee, Krumpendorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
CA should be fixed. --Tomer T 11:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC) - Done @Tomer T: Thanks for your review. CA was fixed. —- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 22:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:20220213_Tesla_Model_S75D_850_9151.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tesla Model S 75D, Baujahr 2017, midnight silver metallic --Granada 16:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Too shallow depth of field - the roof is significantly out of focus. --VileGecko 20:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Want to know if that's really the case. --Granada 21:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC) - Support I'd allow it. If you look at full size, yes, there are areas out of focus, but this is an unusually big photo of a car. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Totally normal way to depict a car. --King of Hearts 00:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 12:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Rainbow_lorikeet_Head_Shot.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Photo of a Rainbow Lorikeet standing on a bird feeder. --Dimitrijemat 13:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too much noise. Blurred head or poor detail--Lmbuga 13:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Lmbuga, what do you mean by poor detail as I can see the feathers very clearly. Have you viewed the image at the full resolution? --Dimitrijemat 15:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
* I disagree, sorry--Lmbuga 16:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Maybe I'm confused. Let's see what others think--Lmbuga 16:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC) - Oppose Lacks fine detail and also quite noisy. Probably ISO 500 is too high. --C messier 11:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy, lack detail. Looks like tilted.--Steindy 13:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Noise reduction may help, if it can be done without losing the feather detail. --Tagooty 14:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Although the image noise is a bit high, the image has significantly more than the 6 MPixels I like to call the lower limit, so that it can be printed to A4 size without any problems and without the noise disturbing. The lighting situation doesn't seem to have allowed a much lower ISO setting, so the photographer can't be blamed for mishandling his camera. -- Smial 14:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Ragnatela_bagnata.jpg
[edit]- Nomination In the wet spider's web, a decoration as if it were an embroidery --PROPOLI87 11:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Out of focus --VileGecko 11:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC) - Support Looks sharp enough to me. --Imehling 15:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with VileGecko. Tomer T 10:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with VileGecko.--Lmbuga 11:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
File:ED4M_0474_in_Central_Suburban_Passenger_Company_colors.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Electric suburban train ED4M model. --Kirill Borisenko 22:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry. Verticals shoud be vertical, a lot of problems with JPEG artifacts, sharpness should be better. --XRay 05:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
What do you mean about verticals? Lens are lens. And where did you see some JPEG squares? Sharpeness could be improved. --Kirill Borisenko 11:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
The building in the background is leaning in. JPEG artifacts for example at the front window of the train. --XRay 05:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Now I see artifacts. But buildings are under lens distortion. What could be done here? It`s normal for fixed smartphone lenses. --Kirill Borisenko 15:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- My recommendation is - if you use a smartphone - to take the photos in RAW format and adjust all the issues with a third party software like Adobe Lightroom or ShiftN. Some issues aren't fixable at a camera or smartphone. --XRay 09:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with XRay. --Steindy 13:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per XRay.--Peulle 09:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)