Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 13 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Памятник_Батюшкову.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The poet's monument (by Shiningstream) --FBilula 12:53, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality, handsome horse. --An insect photographer 14:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)  Oppose per Екатерина Борисова --An insect photographer 18:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There's CA's on horse's tail and someone's disturbing head in bottom-right corner. But the main thing is that this image is in danger of deleting from Commons because it depicts modern sculpture (author died in 2006), and there's no FoP in Russia for modern art. --Екатерина Борисова 00:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 00:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Red_Arrows_BAe_Hawk_Formation_Royal_International_Air_Tattoo_2024_05.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Red Arrows BAe Hawk T.1A flying the "5-4 Split" manoeuvre --Julian Herzog 11:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Wow ! FP candidate to me ! --Sebring12Hrs 11:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the out of focus airplanes need sharpening.--Tzim78 13:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • I have increased the sharpening. --Julian Herzog 15:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
    •  Support Good quality Thank You --Tzim78 14:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The airplanes flying right are sharp. You can't really take a picture of airplanes flying in opposite directions at high speed with both being sharp. --Plozessor 05:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 20:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Plozessor. The airplanes in the front are the focus of the photo, and they're perfectly sharp. This is an incredible action shot. ReneeWrites 10:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Donaustrasse_21_in_Riedlingen_(1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Donaustraße 21 in Riedlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Underexposed --Plozessor 08:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Bad weather, but light is ok. --Sebring12Hrs 08:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Plozessor.--Ermell 10:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Sebring12Hrs --Milseburg 14:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 04:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

File:2024_Zamek_Homole_(03).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Homole Castle 1 --Jacek Halicki 02:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, but there's noise, a lot of CA in the trees, and these persons ... --Plozessor 05:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support (support assumed per CR rules) I disagree --Jacek Halicki 14:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • @BigDom: No support because Jacek is the nominator. --Plozessor 04:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 00:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Vista_de_Ankara,_Turquía,_2024-10-02,_DD_05-07_HDR.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View of Ankara, Turkey --Poco a poco 09:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Tzim78 13:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose (oppose assumed per CR rules) Before promoted, I'd like sufficient categorization please. From what location is it taken? From the Citadel perhaps? Coords are welcome as well --A.Savin 16:53, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done no need though to move to CR for such a request, Poco a poco 20:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
    • Thanks. Wieso man so etwas erst anfragen muss, bleibt wohl ein Rätsel... --A.Savin 02:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 00:39, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Mural_en_Aeropuerto_Río_de_Janeiro.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mural at Rio de Janeiro Airport. --Rjcastillo 01:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Question Is the authorship really sufficiently attributed here? What about the mural's author?--Milseburg 12:29, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until Milseburg's query is addressed. --BigDom 02:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is found at the Rio de Janeiro airport, I don't know who the author could be.--Rjcastillo 20:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  • It would take some investigation to determine, but the FoP notice on the file page states: "Commercial use is allowed, as long as the artist's work is properly attributed", which it clearly isn't here. BigDom (talk) 00:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Thanks BigDom. I agree. Can I withdraw my nomination?. --Rjcastillo 22:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Closing this. The file was deleted as a copyvio. Therefore, it does not make any sense to keep it here.--Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Meran,_Panorama_(Blick_vom_Pulverturm).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Panoramaansicht von Meran--Rolf Kranz 20:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose needs perspective correction --A. Öztas 21:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. I don't see what perspektive should be corrected. -- Spurzem 09:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  • @Spurzem: Look at the buildings in the left half of the picture: The closer they are to the edge, the more they tilt – the image is very curved there.  Neutral The processing also looks kind of weird to me, especially the snowy mountain, but others can discuss about that. --A. Öztas 22:57, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the reviews. I have uploaded a new version. It is a panorama made up of a number of individual shots to show the special geographical position of Merano in a valley basin from a very wide angle.--Rolf Kranz 09:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately the new version has not fixed the problem, but there are now some stitching errors, especially at the top of the steeple of the church on the right. --A. Öztas 12:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Prominent stitching errors now. --Plozessor 13:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Many thanks for the helpful reviews. In an effort to eliminate the distortion, I neglected the stitching. I hope that the new version will now take the justified objections into account.--Rolf Kranz 17:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Thx, looks good now. --Plozessor 05:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Fan_Zone_Mainufer,_Frankfurt_am_Main_(P1190143).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Supporter of the Spanish national team during a public screening of the final of the UEFA Euro 2024 at Fanzone Mainufer, Frankfurt am Main --MB-one 22:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry but the cropped man on the right is dristraying. --An insect photographer 12:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Tighter crop to get rid of the distraction as much as possible --MB-one 22:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok, with the new crop -- Jakubhal 05:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good now. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)