Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 08 2023

• 
  • Nomination Stars at the Striezelmarkt on the Altmarkt in Dresden, Saxony, Germany --XRay 02:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statues of the Bogengalerie with a view of the Kronentor in the Zwinger in Dresden, Saxony, Germany --XRay 02:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View through the Münzgasse to the Frauenkirche, Dresden, Saxony, Germany --XRay 02:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Soap bubble artist on the Neumarkt in Dresden, Saxony, Germany --XRay 02:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close Wing Nectaring of Catopsilia pomona (Fabricius, 1775) - Lemon Emigrant -Female-This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 02:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AMD Ryzen 5 7600 Unterseite. 6 Kerne / 12 threads. Sockel AM5 --Smial 00:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Houses in Chandras, Lasithi. --C messier 20:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 00:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vault of the side nave of the Seminary (Three Hierarchs) Church (1882) of the UNESCO-listed Residence of Bukovinian and Dalmatian Metropolitans, Chernivtsi, 2 M. Kotsiubynskoho Street. By User:Posterrr --Ahonc 19:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-throated Sparrow, South Meadows Trail, East Hartford, CT USA --Pdanese 14:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue diadem (Hypolimnas salmacis) male --Charlesjsharp 12:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calypso caper white (Belenois calypso) female --Charlesjsharp 12:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of Stiftskirche St. Peter in Bad Waldsee, Baden-Wuerttemberg - view towards the organ --Kritzolina 12:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 16:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Modified VW Scirocco III at Essen Motor Show 2023 --MB-one 11:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lighthouse keepers house and Stora Fjäderägg lighthouse. --ArildV 07:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The ruins of the St Olof Church in Sigtuna. --ArildV 07:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Asperö kyrka (church). --ArildV 07:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swedish writer Gunnar Harding at Göteborg Book Fair 2013. --ArildV 07:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to Johansdal, a historic villa in Djurgården (Stockholm). --ArildV 07:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Le Soutien Agricole, Rue de la Poste, in Pérenchies, France --Velvet 07:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Houses, Rue Françoise Dolto 1 to 7, in Pérenchies, France --Velvet 07:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former business sign of the GDR trade organization (HO) at Bautzener Straße 51, Dresden, Saxony, Germany --XRay 07:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Эу.683-89 Steam Locomotive on the Podmoskovnaya station --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination П36 0107 Steam Locomotive on the Podmoskovnaya station --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The power lines appear blueish, is that CA or probably CA fixing gone wrong? --Plozessor 06:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination П36 Steam Locomotive Tender on the Podmoskovnaya station --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden Pavilion on the Podmoskovnaya station, Moscow --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River cruise ship Amacerto after leaving the Bamberg lock. --Ermell 06:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River cruise ship Amacerto after leaving the Bamberg lock. --Ermell 06:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GMS Isar before entering the Bamberg lock. --Ermell 06:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GMS Isar before entering the Bamberg lock. --Ermell 06:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GMS Sequens after leaving the Bamberg lock. --Ermell 06:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination eggs of Cape Verde warbler - Oeufs de Rousserolle du Cap-Vert --Ercé 06:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Paraglider taking off from Tegelberg, Schwangau, Bavaria --Llez 06:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Nice! --ArildV 07:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paraglider taking off from Tegelberg, Schwangau, Bavaria --Llez 06:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paraglider taking off from Tegelberg, Schwangau, Bavaria --Llez 06:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blast furnace 2 in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cooling plant in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1627 wayside shrine near Heidenfeld --Plozessor 05:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel in Rednershof --Plozessor 05:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate of Rotenhan castle ruin --Plozessor 05:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial plate at Dingolshausen cemetery --Plozessor 05:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern part of "Üchtelhäuser Grund" protected landscape area --Plozessor 05:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint George church in Dessau, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrich-Naumann-Str. 2 in Dessau, Saxony-Anh., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary church in Dessau, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sts Peter and Paul church in Dessau, Saxony-A., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Dessau, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shoemaker Kerzinger on Hauptstraße #148, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Book cell on Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beech grove at the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kiosks on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kiosks on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mating Pair of Chilades lajus (Stoll, 1780) - Lime BlueThis image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 02:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry. Too much noise, too many NR artifacts, too little detail. --Plozessor 05:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Partial Open Wing Basking of Castalius rosimon (Fabricius, 1775) - Common PierrotThis image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 02:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Detail is too low, please, review your QI candidates before you nominate them --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-throated sparrow, South Meadows Trail, East Hartford, CT USA--Pdanese 02:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ornate metal door, Mysore Palace, Mysore, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 00:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Saint Philomena's Church", Mural in Mysore Palace --Tagooty 00:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Picture is good, but has an invalid category, please fix that. --Plozessor 05:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruins of the wooden Church of the Nativity of the Theotokos (1862), destroyed by Russian shelling on 7 March 2022, Viazivka, Zhytomyr Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Oleksandr Malyon --Ahonc 22:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Birds-eye view of the Pidhirtsi Castle (Koniecpolskis Castle) (1635–1640), Pidhirtsi, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Roman Bekas --Ahonc 22:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Andrew's Church (1747 — 1762) at dawn, Kyiv, 23 Andriivskyi Descent. By User:KyivMax --Ahonc 22:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Death of Cleopatra - Johann Liss --GoldenArtists 20:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hotel Neuer Fritz, Berlin Mitte --Chainwit. 19:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower and former church in Voila, Sitia. --C messier 19:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Airview of former Agia Sofia monastery near Armenoi, Lasithi, Crete. --C messier 19:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Long Jump at the Men's Decathlon at the European Athletics Championships during the European Championships Munich 2022: Baptiste Thiery, France --Sandro Halank 19:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Nice shot. --Alexander-93 19:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Very clean shot! --PantheraLeo1359531 18:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tiny sunbird (Cinnyris minullus) male --Charlesjsharp 18:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The bird is obstructed, not a QI to me like this, sorry Charles --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Berger's black sprite (Celaenorrhinus plagiatus) --Charlesjsharp 18:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Seafront of Mzymta river in Rosa Khutor Alpine Resort. --Alexander Novikov 18:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Rosa Beach" rest zone in Rosa Khutor Alpine Resort. --Alexander Novikov 18:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Playground in Rosa Khutor Alpine Resort. --Alexander Novikov 11:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Station Garden Competition plaque, London Midland Region, British Railways --Mike Peel 10:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rouveen, church: de kerk van Rouveen --Michielverbeek 09:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southwark Cathedral, London, England --Poco a poco 07:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Round Pond, Kensington Gardens, London, England --Poco a poco 07:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GMS Aschaff in front of the lock in Bamberg --Ermell 06:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GMS Aschaff in front of the lock in Bamberg --Ermell 06:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GMS Carl Presser after leaving the Bamberg lock --Ermell 06:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    This has some color errors (CA removal gone wrong?) between the trees and the sky. --Plozessor 05:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     DoneThanks for the review.--Ermell 14:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Y, now it's good! --Plozessor 15:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1587 landmark Bamberg-Würzburg in Augsfeld --Plozessor 06:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ь 2012 Steam Locomotive on the Podmoskovnaya station --Mike1979 Russia 05:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose This is not sharp unfortunately. --Plozessor 05:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Škoda Kodiaq II at Auto Zuerich 2023 --Alexander-93 16:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close Wing Nectaring of Belenois aurota (Fabricius, 1793) - Pioneer --TAPAN1412 03:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noise too high IMO --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tugboat Mistral in the port of Hamburg --MB-one 23:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ganz Ovation 7.6 at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen, Germany --MB-one 23:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mespelbrunn, Schlossallee, iron crucifix --KaiBorgeest 23:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boggy shore of the Krasivaya Mecha, Efremov, Russia during Indian summer Юрий Д.К. 14:47, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Dust spot on the right --Poco a poco 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
    Agree. Fixed, thank you. Юрий Д.К. 22:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path of cobblestones on Place Boivin Saint-Étienne France --Touam 13:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Le lac de Schiffenen vu depuis le barrage. --Espandero 19:24, 30 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Ok, but please add geocode --Imehling 15:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
    Imehling  Done - Espandero 20:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 17:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Phyang Gompa / Ladakh, India --Imehling 17:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dyrham Park Lodge --Mike Peel 16:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment geocode would be useful --Imehling 15:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
    @Imehling: Thanks for looking, object coordinate added (from the parent category). Thanks. Mike Peel 16:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 17:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Partial open wing Nectaring of Phalanta phalantha (Drury, 1773) - Common Leopard --Sandipoutsider 22:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality despite the high noise levels --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Royal Palm (Roystonea regia) on main path, Karanji Park --Tagooty 03:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Close Wing Basking of Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Plain Tiger--TAPAN1412 02:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Open Wing Nectaring of Acraea terpsicore (Linnaeus, 1758) - Tawny Coster --TAPAN1412 01:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Bokeh is noisy, NR will help. --Tagooty 04:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Close Wing Nectaring of Delias eucharis (Drury, 1773) - Indian Jezebel --TAPAN1412 01:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of the Tower Bridge, London, England --Poco a poco 19:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Koenigsegg Gemera at Auto Zuerich 2023.--Alexander-93 16:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A Village lady holding 'Hasiya' from Shambhunath, NepalI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 16:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Not sure about the focus but still acceptable to me. But, please, add at least 1 category. --Poco a poco 20:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Not done
• 
  • Nomination CPUG photowalk during Wikimania SingaporeI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 16:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline The subject is not sharp enough, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 18:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cave painting in Ain Elkhanfous in Oueslatia in Kairouan gouvernorate in Tunisia ---IssamBarhoumi 13:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mask of God of War from Papua New Guinea in Etnographic museum in Pieniężno. By User:Przykuta --Mechanik rowerowy 12:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Canal from Pasłęka river to hydro power plant in Pierzchały. By User:Przykuta --Mechanik rowerowy 12:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pokrzywianka river in Sawity. By User:Przykuta --Mechanik rowerowy 12:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto at Tenerife --Mike Peel 11:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Republic Square Metro Station Fountains in Yerevan, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 09:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Beautiful shot, but has some CA (visible at the top of the circle). Can you fix that? --Plozessor 18:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)  DoneThank you for comment and help to have really QA photo --Armenak Margarian 12:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Posbank-NL, heath trees and shrubs --Michielverbeek 06:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Close Wing Basking of Tirumala limniace (Cramer, 1775) - Blue Tiger --TAPAN1412 02:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Sharpness low, categories for the species and the location missing --XRay 05:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Close Wing Nectaring of Tirumala limniace (Cramer, 1775) - Blue Tiger --TAPAN1412 02:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Borderline quality; in any case categorization missing --Plozessor 05:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
    category done. --Atudu 08:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Close Wing Nectaring of Tirumala limniace (Cramer, 1775) - Blue Tiger --TAPAN1412 02:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Borderline quality; in any case categorization missing --Plozessor 05:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
    category done. --Atudu 08:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close Wing Nectaring of Danaus genutia (Cramer, 1779) - Striped Tiger -Male. This specimen belongs to sub species Danaus genutia genutia (Cramer, [1779]) – Oriental Striped Tiger in India. This species is legally protected in India under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 16:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 21:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open Wing Basking of Chilades pandava (Horsfield, 1829) - Plains Cupid -Male-This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 16:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 21:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Atlantoxerus getulus at Salinas del Carmen, Fuerteventura --Mike Peel 13:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Painted door (Silva). Funchal, Madeira --Ввласенко 11:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 21:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old town of Mostar in twilight --Gugalcrom123 09:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Quite noisy, lacks fine detail, the bush cover part of the main subject, needs also perspective correction. --C messier 20:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Performance of the ROXORM3N group during Signal Festival 2023 --Janbery 23:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
    A lot of chroma noise. --Plozessor 05:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Not fixed. --Plozessor 05:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Installation "Nexus (Signal Calling)" (author Lukáš Dřevjaný, David Minařík, Michal Mitro, Luboš Zbranek) during Signal Festival 2023 --Janbery 23:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Installation "Axis Mundi" (author Dagmar Šubrtová) during Signal Festival 2023 --Janbery 23:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wi ng Nectaring of Junonia lemonias (Linnaeus, 1758) - Lemon Pansy --Sandipoutsider 07:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the Heidelberg freeway interchange seen from Northeast --MB-one 17:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Maybe a bit oversaturated but QI for me. --C messier 20:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The inner court of Toplou monastery. --C messier 16:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine in Kajnity, Poland. By User:Przykuta --Mechanik rowerowy 09:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support OK. --C messier 20:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Allée des Allumoirs, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 07:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality (although it would be better at portrait orientation). --C messier 20:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grand Col, Les Arcs, France --DimiTalen 06:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marmashen Monastery, Shirak region, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 13:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Noticable clock wise tilt. --C messier 20:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC) DoneThanks--Armenak Margarian 12:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:AERO_Friedrichshafen_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A4695).jpg

• Nomination presentation of the Zefhir compact helicopter (hidden behind the black curtain) at Aero Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 07:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Too much noise imo. --Peulle 08:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Done uploaded a new version --MB-one 22:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose The person is not sharp at all, his pants are pitch black and merged with his shoes, the whole composition with the curtain on the left (hiding the actual subject) and the water bottle in the background is at least questionable. Sorry but not a QI for me. (Also the filename would need to be fixed, but that won't rescue it.) --Plozessor 06:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• Yes, I know it's a difficult shot with poorly lit indoor conditions, but the end result is nontheless not QI level, imo. The sharpness and noise are still too much.--Peulle 11:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose. The person is too dark, the background to bright; no QI for me. -- Spurzem 14:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Hehuan_West_Peak_and_Baigu_Massif.jpg

• Nomination Hehuan West Peak and Baigu Massif in Nantou, Taiwan --Tiouraren 02:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion

•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It is not sharp enough --XRay 05:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Done uploaded a sharpened version. --Tiouraren 02:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you. It may be sharper. Somehow there is already a lot of blurring in the foreground. The two individual dead tree trunks are the only objects that appear reasonably sharp. --XRay 05:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Sharp enough IMO. --Plozessor 06:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Qk and QI for me. --Milseburg 14:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Acceptable. --Smial 16:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

File:St_Maximus_chapel_in_Merseburg_(5).jpg

• Nomination Saint Maximus chapel in Merseburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
   Oppose 8 images by Tournasol7 nominated on 3 December --Tagooty 06:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
   Comment Tagooty, technically the limit is 5 nominations (not 5 pictures) per user. The other of Tournasol7's images were nominated by Sebring12Hrs. Of course I don't know how the two accounts are related. --Plozessor 06:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

@Plozessor The rule (see here) is "No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator".
The issue is that Sebring12 has been nominating 5 images of Turnasol7's for several days, leading to 10 images per day for Tournasol7. This behaviour was discussed at length in Feb 2022, see discussion here. The behaviour stopped after that discussion. --Tagooty 09:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

• As Sebring12 had nominated 5 images/day of Tournasol7 for several days recently, I drew the wrong conclusion. I am glad to know that earlier nominations are for images by several photographers, and have struck my oppose --Tagooty 13:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Saale_river_in_Merseburg_(1).jpg

• Nomination Saale river in Merseburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
   Oppose 8 images by Tournasol7 nominated on 3 December --Tagooty 06:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
   Comment Technically the limit is 5 nominations (not 5 pictures) per user. The other of Tournasol7's images were nominated by Sebring12Hrs. Of course I don't know how the two accounts are related. --Plozessor 08:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

@Plozessor The rule (see here) is "No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator".
The issue is that Sebring12 has been nominating 5 images of Turnasol7's for several days, leading to 10 images per day for Tournasol7. This behaviour was discussed at length in Feb 2022, see discussion here. The behaviour stopped after that discussion. --Tagooty 09:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

• As Sebring12 had nominated 5 images/day of Tournasol7 for several days recently, I drew the wrong conclusion. I am glad to know that earlier nominations are for images by several photographers, and have struck my oppose --Tagooty 13:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Dompropstei_in_Merseburg_(1).jpg

• Nomination Dompropstei in Merseburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
   Oppose 8 images by Tournasol7 nominated on 3 December --Tagooty 06:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
   Comment Technically the limit is 5 nominations (not 5 pictures) per user. The other of Tournasol7's images were nominated by Sebring12Hrs. Of course I don't know how the two accounts are related. --Plozessor 08:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

@Plozessor The rule (see here) is "No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator".
The issue is that Sebring12 has been nominating 5 images of Turnasol7's for several days, leading to 10 images per day for Tournasol7. This behaviour was discussed at length in Feb 2022, see discussion here. The behaviour stopped after that discussion. --Tagooty 09:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

 Comment Exactly. Like back then, the written rule - a person can nominate 5 images per day - has not been breached. The discussion ended with a suggestion to change the rule, so that 5 images per day per author, not per nominator, would be allowed. But it seems that this change was not implemented. So, while these two accounts seem to circumvent the intention of the existing rule, they are not violating it in its current form --Plozessor 10:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

I am currently nominate pictures of Rome, Paris and Naples, and my intention is to bring my help to Tournasol07 and Poco a poco , because they have a lot of pictures. I nominate only pictures the week-end and not the week. I think I am in the right rules... But please be fair if you think I am not in the right way. --Sebring12Hrs 13:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

In this discussion the main problem was that Sebring12Hrs nominated only my nominations at the time, which may have been unfair to others. But I have noticed that since he nominates pictures of different people. Sometimes it was Velvet, sometimes Poco a Poco, sometimes my photos, and other times other people I can't remember. There were a lot of pictures from Paris, where I never took pictures. And it is fair to say that I am happy to see beautiful photos of other people. On the other hand, we should be happy that someone voluntarily helps to nominate and check the photos. Instead of discouraging, we should encourage. QIC is not reserved only for those who take photos. Tournasol7 14:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Unless Sebring12Hrs would be a secondary account of Tournasol7 (which it obviously isn't), I have no issues with the current situation. It is allowed according to the rules. --Plozessor 14:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

• As Sebring12 had nominated 5 images/day of Tournasol7 for several days recently, I drew the wrong conclusion. I am glad to know that earlier nominations are for images by several photographers, and have struck my oppose. --Tagooty 13:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Close_Wing_Nectaring_of_Belenois_aurota_(Fabricius,_1793)_-_Pioneer_WLB_DSC_4849a.jpg

• Nomination Close Wing Nectaring of Belenois aurota (Fabricius, 1793) - Pioneer--TAPAN1412 03:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
• Decline

•  Support ok --Sandro Halank 12:16, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Noisy, hardly any detail, overexposure of the insect head. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Almost all of these pictures from Wiki Loves Butterfly suffer from heavy noise reduction and are lacking detail. Hardly any of them would meet QI criteria if we apply the same standards as for the other pictures. On the other hand, QI guidelines say that standards can be lowered for rare images, and most of these butterfly pictures are fine as inline pictures in a Wikipedia article. What do others think of these pictures? --Plozessor 08:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

• If sufficiently rare, they could be nominated as VI, which only requires images to be good at review size. --Tagooty 09:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment There are 185 photographs of this butterfly species in its main species category. According to the English Wikipedia, the species is widely distributed and sometimes numerous, see en:Belenois aurota. File:Pioneer Belenois aurota by Dr. Raju Kasambe DSCN8526 (4).jpg looks very much better IMO, taken at ISO 100 instead of ISO 3,200. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose It certainly needs better noise reduction. --C messier 21:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nice composition, but noise artifacts and partly overexppsure visible even at A4 size view. Not fixable without destroying detail. --Smial 14:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Cúpula_de_los_Inválidos,_París,_Francia,_2022-10-30,_DD_83-85_HDR.jpg

• Nomination Cúpula de los Inválidos, París, Francia, 2022-10-30 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 01:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion

•  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 02:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
• I disagree. Too dark, too nosiy, CA. --Plozessor 07:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment New version uploaded (brigther, denoised) Poco a poco 23:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Acceptable now! --Plozessor 04:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Lexus_LBX_Auto_Zuerich_2023_1X7A1223.jpg

• Nomination Lexus LBX at Auto Zuerich 2023.--Alexander-93 15:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion

•  Comment Good quality, but the car is too dark - can you lighten it? --Mike Peel 17:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for the review. I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 21:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Still not quite right, sorry - still dark, also rather purple. Can you get closer to the 4th November version in colour and brighness? --Mike Peel 13:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment There was some purple light in the exhibition hall. I'm not sure, whether this is a huge manipulation.--Alexander-93 08:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Hmm, let's see what others think. Thanks. Mike Peel 08:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Picture has correct colors, as can be seen from the white elements in the background. It is also ok otherwise. --Plozessor 08:14, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Istanbul,_Turkey_(November_2023)_-_312.jpg

• Nomination Bayezid II Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey --Another Believer 04:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree, this has a massive blue tint (like the other pictures of that series too). --Plozessor 07:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Plozessor, but this seems fixable --Sandro Halank 15:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed with strong artifacts. --Smial 09:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Świnoujście_port_handlowy_2016-08-26_p.jpg

• Nomination Cargo port in Świnoujście. By User:Przykuta --Mechanik rowerowy 07:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Blurry! --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
   Weak support certainly sharp enough. --C messier 07:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
• Weak  Support typical kit lens resolution, I assume, good enough for an A4 size print. --Smial 18:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Aston_Martin_Vantage_(2017)_1X7A1543.jpg

• Nomination: Aston Martin Vantage in Filderstadt.--Alexander-93 16:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
• Review
•  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful car in disturbing surroundings, upper part of the image too bright, no QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support Picture is good. Quite bright but IMO not overexposed. The other cars in the background are a bit disturbing, but they were there; the photographer made the best out of the circumstances. --Plozessor 11:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

@Plozessor: I keep thinking about my attempt to photograph the black cat in the dark basement without light. There was no light, so the picture was good. I should have introduced it as QI. Best regards -- Spurzem 11:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

No need to get personal. With "circumstances" I was referring to the fact that the car is surrounded by other cars, so there's not really a possibility to take a picture of it without other cars visible. I do NOT accept "circumstances" like "the camera can't take better pictures" or "it was evening and that's why the picture is too dark". --Plozessor 12:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 12:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Lothar, lass das doch mit den sarkastischen Kommentaren. Deinem Urteil bei Autofotos kann man in 99.9% der Fälle vertrauen, wenn da mal einer anderer Ansicht ist: Lass ihn doch. Schulterzuckend ignorieren und abhaken.
  Hallo Smial, wenn ich manche oder gar viele Bewertungen sehe und die Begründungen lese, fällt es mir schwer mich zurückzuhalten. Da werden zum Teil die Details auf einer glatten Wand vermisst, und im Gegensatz dazu gelten fehlbelichtete Fotos von Objekten in absolutem Durcheinander als Qualitätsbilder. Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem 13:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Wäre doch langweilig, wenn bei Diskussionen alle der gleichen Meinung wären ;) ... Ich stimme dir aber völlig zu, dass manche Bewertungen ('auf dem Foto ist zwar nichts zu erkennen, aber das ist in Ordnung, weil es dunkel war und der Fotograf nur ein billiges Smartphone hatte') tatsächlich sehr seltsam sind. Gleichzeitig ist das Empfinden, wann ein Bild zu hell oder zu dunkel ist, aber relativ, solange es keine überstrahlten oder schwarzen Flächen gibt. Und es scheint auch Unterschiede zu geben, worauf jemand bei der Beurteilung den Fokus legt - bei diesem Bild hier kann man über die Helligkeit und den Hintergrund diskutieren, aber es ist ziemlich scharf. Die Statue obendrüber ist extrem unscharf (allein dafür würden die allermeisten das Bild ablehnen), perspektivisch verzerrt (allein dafür würden die allermeisten das Bild ablehnen) und hat einen unbrauchbaren Dateinamen (allein dafür würden die allermeisten das Bild ablehnen), aber für dich ist das Bild ok. Dafür sind Diskussionen halt da ... --Plozessor 14:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

So kann man es sicherlich sehen. Mir fällt seit einiger Zeit auf, dass für viele Juroren die Bildgestaltung absolut unbedeutend ist. Hauptsache: Das Bild ist scharf und die senkrechten Linien weichen kein halbes Grad von der Senkrechten ab, so unnatürlich es auch aussehen und alles andere verzerrt sein mag. -- Spurzem 14:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Ja, der Wahn nach korrekten 'verticals' ist mir hier als allererstes aufgefallen (schön zu sehen, dass das nicht nur mir seltsam erscheint). Ich hatte das Gefühl, dass es auf nichts anderes ankommt - die Vertikalen passen, QI, die Vertikalen passen nicht, kein QI. Wenn man Bilder von extrem weit von unten macht und das Bild dann so verzerrt, dass die Vertikalen passen, sieht es für meine Begriffe total unnatürlich aus (u. a. ist es oben extrem in die Höhe gezogen), wird aber anerkannt. Wenn man es natürlich aussehen lässt, hat man keine Chance. Bezüglich der Bildgestaltung muss ich mir aber auch mal an die eigene Nase fassen, da hatte ich nicht immer drauf geachtet (gleichzeitig gibt es da aber den größten Spielraum für individuellen Geschmack). Gab hier ja aber auch ein paar Diskussionen, wo behauptet wurde, bei QI ginge es ausschließlich um die technische Qualität und die Bildgestaltung ("composition") würde für QI keine Rolle spielen (was natürlich falsch ist). --Plozessor 05:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Bei der Bildgestaltung knirsche ich gerade bei den Auto-Fotos (aber nicht nur dort...) seit langem mit den Zähnen, die Karren werden fast ausnahmslos gruselig in Szene gesetzt. Aber hier ist QIC, nicht FPC, und da lehne ich Bilder nur relativ selten und wenn es ganz schlimm kommt wegen dieses Kriteriums ab. Sonst müsste ich ja bei beinahe jedem dieser Parkplatzknipsereien (sorry) Einspruch erheben. Was die Zwangsvertikalisierung angeht: Die Perspektivekorrektur habe ich zwar nicht erfunden, aber in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia vor vielen Jahren propagiert. Nur ging es da um das Vermeiden von weit verbreiteten Fehlern bei der Aufnahme. Und es ging um Aufnahmen mit gängigen Objektiven gemäßigter Brennweiten. Heute aber nutzen viele extreme Weitwinkelobjektive, "damit alles draufpaßt", deren Abbildungseigenschaften mit Bildwinkeln von 90°, 100° oder noch mehr von Haus aus schon sehr speziell sind, und diese werden dann zusätzlich noch digital geshiftet. Was dann schon mal zu rechnerischen Bildwinkeln von 130° oder mehr führt und nur noch als grotesk bezeichnet werden kann. Mit der eigentlichen Intention, Objekte so abzubilden, wie der Architekt die gezeichnet hat, nämlich mit vertikalen Wänden, hat das schon lange nichts mehr zu tun. Es wird dabei übersehen, dass Architekten für ihre perspektivischen Zeichnungen sowohl im Abstand wie auch vertikal einen frei wählbaren virtuellen Standort einnehmen können und bis auf seltene Ausnahmen gewöhnlich mit "Normalbrennweite" oder allenfalls leichtem Weitwinkel malen. Es ist in den allermeisten Fällenn unmöglich, das mit einer Kamera exakt zu kopieren oder auch nur halbwegs zu erreichen. --Smial 13:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

 Comment I uploaded a version with a darker upper part, thanks for that critic.
Jeder sollte seine eigene Meinung einbringen dürfen und dafür nicht von anderen blöd angemacht werden. Das mit dem Hintergrund kann man sicher so sehen, ein Auto ohne Autos im Hintergrund wäre sicher besser. Es ist aber nun mal auch so, dass sich Autos in der Regel in der Umgebung anderer Autos befinden und ein besseres in Szene setzen kaum möglich ist. Fotografiert habe ich den Aston Martin dennoch, denn ich finde die Spezifikation mit den gelbfarbenen Elementen ziemlich nett; und wer weiß, ob man so eine Variante noch mal vor die Linse bekommt. Wenn man dieses Bild hier als Knipserei bezeichnet, dann ist das eine Meinung, die ich respektiere, aber doch schade finde, da es mich doch mehr Zeit gekostet hat, als es auf den ersten Blick ersichtlich zu sein scheint: Wegen des Herbstes habe ich einige Blätter vom Fahrzeug und Boden entfernt. Das Licht war relativ schwierig zu händeln, da es nur vereinzelt bewölkt war und ich deshalb gewartet habe, bis sich mal eine Wolke vor die relativ tief stehende Sonne schiebt. Auch die Schärfe so hinzubekommen, hat mehrere Versuche benötigt, genauso wie den richtigen Abstand zum Aston zu finden.--Alexander-93 08:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)