Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Silent reverence.jpg

Info created by Unknown - uploaded and nominated by Luca Z. -- Luca Z. 13:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luca Z. 13:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Wow. It's very dark, but the darkness is important in this shot. The quality of the scan is very high (you can see the grain of the film). --TM 14:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Heptagon 18:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Little bit too pathetic, but looks good. --Karelj 21:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 23:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sorry, don't like it at all (a lot kitschy IMO) -- Alvesgaspar 00:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only artistic, there is soo many similar shot (FP). --Beyond silence 13:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which FP is similar? What is wrong about artistic shots? --AngMoKio 14:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I speaking about many FP conteyour (may false spelling) photos. --Beyond silence 17:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is "contre-jour", meaning "against the light" -- Alvesgaspar 00:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I tend to agree with Alvesgaspar...it is really a bit too much. --AngMoKio 14:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Ayack 15:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no imagineable encyclopedic use, whatsoever. FRZ 18:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pls read guidelines before starting to vote. There is no encyclopedic value needed. --AngMoKio 18:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Thamusemeantfan 02:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose like Alvesgaspar --Mbdortmund 09:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose like Alvesgaspar: too kitschy. --Diligent 08:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 12:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remember, this is a 1944 image. It is powerful and visually as well as aesthetically appealing. The age adds value due to the Zeitgeist. --Freedom to share 08:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question As Oppose votes without any grounding are ignored, will we ignore or accept the argument of FRZ, who criticised the image based on an aspect on which FPs are not evaluated? Freedom to share 17:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Info - Oppose votes without justification are not ignored in Commons. This was the way COM:FPC was devised and no consensus was still reached to alter that culture -- Alvesgaspar 19:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Freedom to share brings up an interesting thing. I think we should discuss how we handle such cases. FRZ obviously just passed by and made some votes without reading the guidelines. --AngMoKio 20:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Lijealso 03:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu