Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg/2

File:Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 13:04:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg/2

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info Johannisburg Castle in Aschaffenburg. It's a renomination. I nominated it a few weeks ago. Unfortunately, when I was nominated for the first time, I had no opportunity to respond to the legitimate criticism. I'm sorry and ask for your indulgence. Now I've done the improvements and I nominate it again. All by me. --Milseburg (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me now, especially the top crop is much better. --Aristeas (talk) 13:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I voted for it last time too. Cmao20 (talk) 18:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for giving it the space it needs. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good picture. --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 11:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Please upload the uncompressed version without JPEG artifacts. --XRay 💬 21:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support, once again. Daniel Case (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I would support again, but XRay, could you go into more detail on what you're seeing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• Around the towers are visible JPEG artifacts. For these kind of photographs and the resolution the filesize seems to be very small. --XRay 💬 09:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• I do see that the current version of this photo is a much smaller file than the original, but what should I be looking for to see the artifacts? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• RealIy, don't see the artifacts. Could the cable for the lightning rods be meant? I am not allowed to dismantle them. After a discussion with Poco over one year ago on QIC, I was happy to have found a way to bring quality and compression together. I don't see any difference in quality around the towersbetween the 18 MP version and the 5 MP version around the towers. I could puff up. But only so that there is a higher number of bytes. --Milseburg (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Neither of us sees them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose This version is better (above all the crop) than the other one, so the most obvious problem of the last candidate is fixed. Detail is similar in both versions but not at FP level IMHO in spite of best possible settings, rather a limitation of the camera Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany