Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danube delta.jpg

File:Danube delta.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 11:55:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Danube delta.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danube delta.jpg

•  Info created by Cody escadron delta - uploaded by Cody escadron delta - nominated by Cody escadron delta -- Cody escadron delta (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cody escadron delta (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose blown sky. --Dschwen (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Dschwen. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand your sentence, please in french or english. Cody escadron delta (talk) 06:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

What High Fin means by saying "Per Dschwen" is that he opposes for the same reason that Dschwen gave, which is that the image has a blown sky. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 17:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

It's the sun, look in right or this picture. Cody escadron delta (talk) 06:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

•  Info -- Let me try to explain. We use the expression "blown" to designate those parts of the picture that are pure white (with pixel values equal to 255, the maximum) due to excessive light. All cameras, especially the digital ones, have a limited capacity to reproduce the whole range of light intensities we found in the real world (the so-called "dynamic range"). In this case you should have used a larger F number (or a larger shutter speed) or, even better, to chose another angle and avoid pointing to the brighter parts of the sky. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)