Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Стара обсерваторія Білий слон на горі Піп Іван Чорногорський.jpg

File:Стара обсерваторія Білий слон на горі Піп Іван Чорногорський.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2016 at 11:16:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Стара обсерваторія Білий слон на горі Піп Іван Чорногорський.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Стара обсерваторія Білий слон на горі Піп Іван Чорногорський.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
•  Info created and uploaded by Khoroshkov - nominated by Ivar (talk) 11:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I half expect someone to say this is oversaturated, but it looks to me like the colors could be real, and maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not noticing any large posterized areas. Note that the texture of individual trees is evident on the next couple of hills over on the right. I think this photo is pretty spectacular, with what I consider excellent form, and I therefore understand why Ivar likes it. This is a kind of fairy tale castle pic, but it doesn't look like the fantasy front-page photo below, but instead is full of details, except where fog, clouds and distance blur them naturally. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I don't find it oversaturated at all. In some light, vegetation can take on very strong colors and since this is at an altitude of over 2000 meter, the sky can sometimes be a shade darker than usual. The clouds form a fantastic framing of the old observatory. I would like geocode though, pretty please, both {{Camera location}} and {{Object location}}. cart-Talk 17:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment object location added. Since I'm not an author, I can't help with camera location. --Ivar (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 22:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Strong support Such fine detail! Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

  That, unfortunately, means it was probably downsampled before upload. Still more than enough pixels for FP though given the flawlessness at 100%. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support amazing --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 09:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support. JukoFF (talk) 19:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC) 
•  Support great! --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 23:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas