Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Editor1722
Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official portrait photos from the site of the Government of Moldova; site however didn't release them as CC0 as claimed – in fact, a site-wide "© All rights reserved" is visible in the footer.
- File:Rodica Iordanov 2022.jpg
- File:Alexei Buzu 2023.jpg
- File:Sergiu Prodan 2021.jpg
- File:Anatolie Topală 2021.jpg
- File:Iurie Țurcanu 2021.jpg
- File:Anatolie Nosatîi 2021.jpg
- File:Ala Nemerenco 2021.jpg
- File:Dumitru Budianschi 2021.jpg
- File:Oleg Serebrian 2022.jpg
Gikü (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)
[edit]License at source is "Public Domain Mark" and not CC BY SA 4.0; also ALL PHOTOS FROM MOLDOVAN PARLIAMENT'S FLICKR SHOULD BE DELETED as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 25 March 2021 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from Parlamentul Republicii Moldova Flickr stream. CC TheAafi as the license reviewer of one affected file.
- File:Artur Mija.jpg
- File:S. Prodan 2023.jpg
- File:Dumitru Alaiba 2022.jpg
- File:Doina Gherman 2023.jpg
- File:16.02.2023 Ședința Comisiei juridice, numiri și imunități - 52692613609.jpg
- File:Victor Parlicov.jpg
- File:Rodica Iordanov.jpg
- File:Alexei Buzu.jpg
- File:Lilia Dabija 2023.jpg
- File:Oleg Serebrian 2023.jpg
- File:Veronica Mihailov-Moraru 2023.jpg
- File:Olesea Stamate 2021.jpg
- File:Sergiu Prodan 2023 Parlament.jpg
Gikü (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. I'm not sure how I made this error. I've reversed it. I support deletion in accordance with the nomination's rationale. In fact while reviewing I did search the parliament's name a number of times to make sure I was doing a right thing but unfortunately. I perhaps only verified the message the Flickr-review template was saying and forgot to change the license-template. Now there is so much, the source is clearly having some inaccuracies and it is difficult to believe them. As the nominator mentions elsewhere These three files, however, were made 20+ years ago, and it is unclear whether they too are Parliament's work or not.. ─ The Aafī (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense PD rationale - the medal may be PD, but the photograph of the medal is a separate work and there is no free license at the source site. (Medals are 3D works, so Bridgeman does not apply.)
Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)