Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses

Per COM:FOP#Bosnia and Herzegovina: modern monuments, not in the public domain.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarification: How can a Sarajevo Rose be a modern monument? -- 32X (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is dedicated to someone, therefore it is a monument. Perhaps a memorial would be a better word. It is described as such in en:Sarajevo Rose. In any case, they can be regarded as sculptural works. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They're also described as 'monuments' and 'memorials' that "were installed on the sites of the largest massacres where shells killed three or more people" in this article. The article also tells us that the idea for their design came from a professor of architecture at the University of Sarajevo, Nedzad Kurto. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can there be copyright on the simple marking of bullet holes in the pavement? And who would hold the copyright on the shape of the bullet hole anyway? That doesn't make sense to me. --j.budissin^+/- 14:32, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+1 That's a nonsense-deletion. --Superikonoskop (talk) 22:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mortar shell's explosion causes a fragmentation pattern, that was only filled with red resin. That´s not a work of art.--Superikonoskop (talk) 08:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses

Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses

Navigation menu

Search