Commons:Deletion requests/File:KkStB 193 historische Aufnahme.png
This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It is not known when it was published. Licence is invalid. No evidence that the author died 70 years ago. Photo scanned from book published in 1977. Please refer to Commons:Publication. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. In this book is clause - All rights reserved. Licence is invalid. As long as there's no evidence that the photograph was published before 1953, we're talking about a fake license and illegal copying of photos from the book. This is not factory photography. there are many indications that this is a photograph taken by a private person. All content in the book is copyrighted by the publisher. Respecting the law is not about advancing treatment without treatment. is a photo from an external collection. It never means that someone can scan a photo from a book and a recipe that they introduce shortly after creating it. It can be assumed that the photo is from many years later. There are no signs that this is a promotional photo. He can never immediately receive an assessment that a given photo is given immediately after it has been taken. It shouldn't be discretionary. This can never be an arbitrary decision by one editor. This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: Bernhard Schmeiser, "Krauss-Lokomotiven", Verlag Slezak, Wien, 1977, ISBN 9783900134365. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Keep Datei ist 1935 entstanden. Rainerhaufe (talk) 12:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete The date the photo was taken doesn't matter. The date of publication of the photo is more important. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. Uoijm77 (talk) 12:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep falsch. Die Aufnahme wird schon viel früher veröffentlicht worden sein, und der Veröffentlicher von 1977 hat ein Foto verwendet, daß heute gemeinfrei ist, weil es fast 100 Jahre alt ist. Rainerhaufe (talk) 10:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete An incomprehensible argument. Conjuring reality is pointless. The age of the photo in this case does not matter. The only complaint is the lack of evidence that the photo was published more than 70 years ago. It is possible that the picture comes from a private collection. The only documented case of the publication of this photo is the aforementioned book. Picture is not public domain. Respecting copyright is not about making claims without evidence. No one can ever immediately assume that a photo was published immediately after it was taken. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Wir sollen nicht mehrmals Keep bzw. Delete verwenden. Die Bildunterschrift ist "um 1935 aufgenommen". Der Fotograf wurde nicht genannt, es wurde bloß die Fotosammlung Zell/Griebl angeführt. So viel wie ich weiß gemeinfrei. Außerdem handelt es sich lediglich um Scans vom Buch. Der Urheber heutzutage hat andere Möglichkeiten mit dem Scannen vom Negativ das bringt viel bessere Abbildungen. Rainerhaufe (talk) 11:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright laws should be respected by everyone. There is no clear evidence that the photo is in the public domain. Uoijm77 (talk) 10:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- die Bildunterschrift um 1935 aufgenommen zeigt aber ein gemeinfreies Foto an.Rainerhaufe (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright laws should be respected by everyone. There is no clear evidence that the photo is in the public domain. Uoijm77 (talk) 10:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Wir sollen nicht mehrmals
Deleted: Evidence missing that this photograph was published early enough. The given information is a publication date is 1977. (Remark: If author's death is unknown and the date of creation of the work was over 120 years ago it may be a reasonable assumption that the copyright has expired - this is not the case.). --Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
