Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacivelasquez.JPG
Out of scope; obviously a personal image, thereby violating personality rights and highly unusable.--Heraldicos (talk) 01:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep Have you read the description? Photo was made during an interview. The image is in use in es:Jaci Velasquez. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete Probable copyright infringement, derivative work. --Heraldicos (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Derivative of what? Uploader is an admin on Spanish wikipedia, and he says that it is his own work, I see no reason for distrust. On the other hand there is your deletion request with reasons that have no merit. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
: Sockpuppet of Heraldicos (Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Heraldicos) Patrícia msg 19:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete are you his spokesman?, no matter if the user is an admin on Spanish wikipedia or youtube, personality rights warning, the description is "headshot", clearly copyright infringement.--Vexilio (talk) 01:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC): Sockpuppet of Heraldicos (Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Heraldicos) Patrícia msg 19:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete for the reasons given above. --Prodigynet (talk) 01:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The pictured has been taken in a interview... please, show me the source of this picture???... I have the original and the resolution is so big to be a copy. I am sorry for my bad english.--User:Netito777 04:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep There is no evidence (and none has been presented) that this is a copyvio. Image is currently used on :es and :fi. In addition, our personality rights-tag has nothing to do with this rfd, but is mainly directed at re-users of such images in order to protect the depicted persons from inappropriate use or changes of their images. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PEOPLE --KS aus F (talk) 14:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The image is used in es:Jaci Velasquez and fi:Jaci Velasquez, therefore it is within project scope. The subject is a pop singer and the image was taken during an interview, thus in a moment this person was actively seeking the public interest. One can hardly imagine any situation where the subject has less a reasonable expectation of privacy. The accusation of a copyright infringement without any foundation is just malicious. --Rotkraut (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
: Sockpuppet of Heraldicos (Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Heraldicos) Patrícia msg 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete Illegal used in es:Jaci Velasquez or fi:Jaci Velasquez by uploader, the subject can be a pop singer, the mother of nature or even a queen, this image was taken in a private place and requiring consent (no provided by uploader).--Celestial (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC): Sockpuppet of Heraldicos (Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Heraldicos) Patrícia msg 19:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete the uploader already has committed a violation of copyvio before, see his image File:EvelynGarcia.JPG with http://deportes.elsalvador.com. And now the uploader no provided any official consent because she's a pop singer, no his sister or some.--Orgfox (talk) 04:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Celestial & Orgfox: did you actually read COM:PEOPLE, in particular Section “What are 'public' and 'private' places?” If so, could you please enligthen me and explain how someone can have a reasonable expectation of privacy while giving an interview to the public at the same time? And on the copyvio issue: it's soo easy to accuse somebody. But it is dishonest to accuse somebody without giving even a tiny hint on what the accusation is based on. What makes you believe that this image is a copyvio? --Rotkraut (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:: Sockpuppet of Heraldicos (Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Heraldicos) Patrícia msg 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
This image was taken in a private place and the uploader no provided any official consent, because she's a pop singer, COM:PEOPLE. It's more easy to deceive somebody, also the permission for use of this work hasn't been archived in Wikimedia OTRS system.--Celestial (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Is a interview a private place???... please!!! --User:Netito777 19:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep: in scope, public place, notable person, no reason to believe it is a copyvio etc. --Kjetil_r 00:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - in scope, notable person. Technically where the interview is taking place may not be a public space, but it seems to me that if you're giving an interview then that kind of changes things. Clearly you would expect to have photos taken at such a thing, so seems to me there's no issue. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Heraldicos, use one account at a time, please. Thank you. Patrícia msg 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Heraldicos is an infinite expulsed user in w:es with many Sockpuppets... I blocked his sockpuppets there. It just is information to you know who is he. --User:Netito777 05:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Heraldicos, use one account at a time, please. Thank you. Patrícia msg 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Kept. In use, In Scope Abigor talk 05:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
