Commons:Deletion requests/File:Foto shop.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons is not private photo album St1995 20:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC) And also:
St1995 20:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Is this a malformed DR? Linke to one file in the heading and then a list of other files? -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: This badly bundled lazy DR needs to be split for clarity. I’m creating separate H4 headings now to harbour the discussion about these disparate files. People nominating for deletion this kind of grabbags of files should get a 24h block to cool their greedeletion glands. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:13, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep File:Foto shop.jpg: It is a good photograph, high pixel count and intact EXIF, in spite of the moronic way it was originally identified. It was taken on Christams day, EXIF tells us that much. Would be interesting to find out the location, maybe based on the background — hair dresser Salón las Reinas (Queens’ Hall), and graffiti with (telephone?) number «C.V.D 598-7903». -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Commons is not private photo album. This file was uploaded 4 years ago (!), but has not been used since that time.
Delete per this St1995 16:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons is not what you think it is, if you gauge the worthiness of media items by its use in wikimedia projects. Commons is much more than an illustration service for Wikipedias; I suggest you go read COM:SCOPE and refrain from misguided deletion requests in the meanwhile. -- Tuválkin ✉ 17:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'll deal with ...read COM:SCOPE and refrain from misguided deletion requests... myself. St1995 17:31, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- How do you know that in these past 4 years this photo wasn’t used to illustrate a dozen books, boy band karaoke album covers, or holiday greeting cards with bad poetry? -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:13, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons is not what you think it is, if you gauge the worthiness of media items by its use in wikimedia projects. Commons is much more than an illustration service for Wikipedias; I suggest you go read COM:SCOPE and refrain from misguided deletion requests in the meanwhile. -- Tuválkin ✉ 17:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete the other three (incl. File:Griselda Beatriz Dominguez.jpg), although a DR bundling five disparate images like these is in itself something that the community should frown upon, as it needlessly tax anyone who wants to seriously evaluate the merits of the request. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete the other three (incl. File:Kathy.jpg), although a DR bundling five disparate images like these is in itself something that the community should frown upon, as it needlessly tax anyone who wants to seriously evaluate the merits of the request. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep File:JJossa.jpg: Because it is in scope. -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete JJossa.jpg. This is an unencyclopaedic photo that just happens to be of a notable person. We have better photos of her now (the last deletion request only closed as keep because it was the only photo of Jossa on Commons). AnemoneProjectors (talk) (Flickr) 20:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is one of only two modern day cases of Category:Coins in mouth we have classified. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:13, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete the other three (incl. File:Dieguet.jpg), although a DR bundling five disparate images like these is in itself something that the community should frown upon, as it needlessly tax anyone who wants to seriously evaluate the merits of the request. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: personal image, and/or poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
