Commons:Deletion requests/File:Artistic Representation of a Woman 3.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Random vulva photo, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- I would also nominate related uploads from the same user for same reason per nom:
- File:Femininity and Art.jpg
- File:Artistic Representation of a Woman 2.jpg
- File:Artistic Representation of a Woman 4.jpg
- File:Artistic Representation of a Woman 5.jpg
- File:Artistic Representation of a Woman 6.jpg
- File:Sunbathing Buttocks.jpg
- File:Labia Majora with natural sunlight.jpg
- File:Female Buttocks with natural light.jpg
- File:Adult Female Buttocks.jpg
- File:A woman laying down on a bed without clothes.jpg
- File:Female Breast and Nipple.jpg
- File:Female Form.jpg
- File:White Thong Bikini 2.jpg
- File:White Thong Bikini.jpg
- Atomicdragon136 (talk) 16:46, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Tagged. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure on this one; however, I definitely oppose the blanket deletion request by Atomicdragon136, as some of those photos are of very high quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a random photo, it took time to prepare the setting, to have the right lighting, and high quality equipment was used with the best possible lighting. And so to you because it is a vulva it has no educational value? What type of conclusion is that? NCroatie (talk) 07:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- 🔵Keep As there are no images in these categories with such high quality. R. A. Sterling (talk) 08:15, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- So here is why these files should be kept on wikimedia commons: these files are of very high quality pixel wise and DPI wise. They also have amazing lighting and the pictures were taken in professional settings with professional equipment while maintaining a normal/natural aspect. They have several educational values being artistic reference (for drawing, painting, photography, etc), anatomy reference, health reference. They can also be used on wikipedia pages or similar platforms, or for publications, articles, etc. And the most important point: these pictures convey the message that nudity is normal, just a state, and a part of the body that should be considered as normal as a nose for example and that have been made unjustly taboo and shamed by outdated cultural norms. It cannot be argued rationally or scientifically that nudity is not normal and by repeateadly viewing such images, of normal nudity settings, nudity comes accross as normal, as a state of being. Shaming and hiding such pictures only lead to a sick and unhealthy society where nudity can be used against people through manipulation or blackmailing and this wouldn't be the case if nudity was seen as normal by everyone. NCroatie (talk) 11:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep High quality images. --RAN (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2024 (UTC)