Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aktiva automotive.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Changing ownership Gero1119 (talk) 07:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Keep And? Feel free to take a new photograph which shows the building with the new company name. I suggest that we also keep the old one. Wikimedia exists also to document the history in this case the industrial history. Feel free to add a note on the file description page mentioning the new owner. --Zaccarias (talk) 10:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not corelated with main article, false info 46.217.244.109 05:46, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File is in use on et:Aktiva (ettevõte) and mk:Актива (претпријатие). Commons should not delete files just because they're inaccurate. See COM:NPOV for details. Use {{Factual accuracy}} if there is a dispute. --bjh21 (talk) 18:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by B dash as no permission (No permission since). It is not clear whose permission should be obtained. The uploader has claimed own work ("self-photographed"). 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:34, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Looking at the uploader's history, I'm not convinced that they understand (or understood at the time) what "own work", "author" or "copyright holder" mean. The previous deletion nomination above may have been a poorly articulated attempt to correct previous mistakes, much like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sanja Spasova.jpg. Given the lack of metadata and the uploader's history, I'm inclined to say
delete. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
