Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Mascots/Requests/Penyulap (de-Mascot)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Even if it is meant as a humorous response to a self-acclaimed mascot, it can also be seen as an attack page. Claims that anyone acts as a troll belong to COM:AN/U, not at a random page within the Commons namespace. AFBorchert (talk) 13:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete as out of scope However I am concerned with the phrasing of this nomination. The page may be amusing, even sarcastic, but Penyulap is a self-confessed troll (see diff) and so cannot literally be an attack page for that reason alone. In addition, Penyulap has accused many people of being trolls, their current user talk page (at the top) accuses both myself and MichaelMaggs of being trolls and yet no administrator or bureaucrat seems to believe that counts as maintaining an attack page. If you wish to retain the phrasing of the current nomination, perhaps you would be kind enough to explain how this interpretation of policy appears to be implemented in a one-sided way, or perhaps if we delete this page, Penyulap should similarly be required to remove their persistent claims (now having been published for over 5 weeks) about other contributors to this project from their user talk page, unless they are prepared to take their claims to AN/U as you suggested is expected for Mattbuck? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- That I nominated this for deletion does not imply that calling other users names elsewhere is appropriate. I surely did not intend any one-sideness with this nomination. The other cases of name calling should be handled where appropriate, i.e. through redactions by uninvolved or at some administrative board, if necessary. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Outlived its funnyness—It was funny when it was created but now I think it's just gathering dust and should be deleted for all reasons mentioned.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Create some kind of BJAODN and put it there. May still be funny to future generations of editors. darkweasel94 14:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . -mattbuck (Talk) 15:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)