Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/07/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Byron pool 186.172.221.186 00:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Taylor Instagram 186.172.221.186 00:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1 - https://twitter.com/oaklandrootssc/status/1413002577394819072. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal selfie of non-contributor. Nutshinou Talk! 00:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emirortech (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage outside userpage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Request of the author, unused, out of scope (not much useful for AI Art) MrAlanKoh (talk) 05:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Request of the author, unused, out of scope (not much useful for AI Art) MrAlanKoh (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Request of the author, unused, out of scope (not much useful for AI Art) MrAlanKoh (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Request of the author, unused, out of scope (not much useful for AI Art) MrAlanKoh (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
The license for this image here is CC BY NC 4.0 It has a Non-Commercial restriction Leoboudv (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Imagen de una menor de edad, sin autorización aparente de sus tutores legales. Niccocl (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope - unused personal image --Mazbel (Talk) 21:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Mazbel. Being the photo of a minor, is not an issue actually. the issue is that this one is out of scope. --Bedivere (talk) 21:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Something "smells fishy" to me about this photo. Look immediately above her left wrist and her right shoulder. At the very lieast, this looks retouched. Since this was uploaded by someone with no prior uploads, and there is no EXIF data, this makes me suspicious. Jmabel ! talk 18:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Whoa! Stop the presses. I am in communication with the one who took that picture. It's totally legit, far more than you can imagine is possible, quite literally. No one more authoritative could have taken it. At the moment, I am waiting for a response to see if they are willing to use their real identity, as that would out them, especially their Wikipedia editing. That may or may not be a problem. I have sent them a new email. The image description is accurate: "Abi Carter at the US Gymnastics Olympic Trials 2024." -- Valjean (talk) 20:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Their response: "I'd certainly prefer to stay anonymous. I'm happy to just let it be taken down and let you upload saying you have all necessary rights. Or we can just not use the photo... I'm good with whatever."
- This is a bit sad. It's a good picture, much better than the one we currently use in her article. If I were to upload the picture, how would I be able to give the proper credit? I'm not sure how that would work. -- Valjean (talk) 21:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Could they provide the original photo, visually unedited but with EXIF data removed? That would completely satisfy my doubts. - Jmabel ! talk 22:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'll contact them. That might work. BTW, if you look at their talk page User talk:Cpeter30, you'll see they have uploaded several files before. Because they were deleted, they don't show up in their contribution history here. They have an editing history at Wikipedia. -- Valjean (talk) 23:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- NOTE: Valjean and I just had a little off-wiki correspondence about this. I think it's legit, despite my earlier suspicions. It's apparently a cell phone photo, not (as I'd thought) a DSLR photo, and the artifacts I'd noticed are actually pretty common from phones that try to "improve" the photo with AI instead of giving a straight optical image and letting the photographer decide to either post-process or not. Mine does the same (less well), which is why I almost never use it for serious photography.
- I looked through the uploaders prior uploads, all deleted as copyvios. The uploader does not appear to have a good grasp of copyright law, but I checked several of their other uploads and they'd always been honest about saying whose photo it was (in the description, even if the "author" field incorrectly said "{{Own}}". So at this point I'm inclined to assume good faith.
- Unless anyone has a further problem with this, I'm inclined to withdraw my nomination. I'll go to COM:AN and ask another admin besides myself to close this as "kept". - Jmabel ! talk 02:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. -- Valjean (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Could they provide the original photo, visually unedited but with EXIF data removed? That would completely satisfy my doubts. - Jmabel ! talk 22:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
File:PM meets the Players of T 20 World Cup winning team at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg, in New Delhi on July 04, 2024 (Cropped).jpg
[edit]File already exists Channanaikl (talk) 17:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination File:Virat Kohli in PMO New Delhi.jpg. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
File:PM meets the Players of T 20 World Cup winning team at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg, in New Delhi on July 04, 2024.jpg
[edit]File already exists Channanaikl (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Prime Minister Of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Shri Virat Kohli.jpg. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Image has no verifiable online source. Leoboudv (talk) 10:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it does, it is research grade on iNaturalist. Source is here. GooseSpoon (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Keep: Online source given and license now verified. Next time please give the online source and type in {{INaturalistreview}} for the Naturalist Review bot to review the image. GooseSpoon Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Lymantria (talk) 16:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
German drawing from 1922. Could be public domain but we'd need to know the author. Otherwise, we'd have to wait until 2043. Abzeronow (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Compare Datei:Sigmund_Pick_Abraham.jpg on the German Wikipedia. Per this, the drawing itself was created before 1912 (per Sigmund Pick's handwritten signature on that version), with Pick (+1922) as the claimed copyright holder. I suppose the image was uploaded in 2022 because the copyright was thought to expire at that time. Renerpho (talk) 07:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD in the US because it was published before 1923 and PD in Germany because the author died in 1922. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawing DR; PD file, will fix shortly. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t need to upload contents to Wikimedia Commons anymore. I appreciate every person concerned with my journey. Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: but blanked. no reason to not keep this talk page's history accessible. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-sized image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D works in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 17:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Priyanji Perera (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:DEMINIMIS
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abilityukeme (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:NUDE
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crossroberto2020 odcap cross (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
no sourced map.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Photo by G. L. Manuel frères. One of the brothers Gaston Manuel died in 1967, so it appears to be in French copyright until 2038. Abzeronow (talk) 21:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Work prominently features a medal from 1937. Possibly public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
1939 American photograph, possibly public domain by formalities, which should be checked. Abzeronow (talk) 21:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of scope.
- File:Купальщики (Новороссийск).jpg
- File:Площадь Героев (Волгоград) (2).jpg
- File:Площадь Героев (Волгоград) (1).jpg
- File:User Majskij. Владивосток, 2019.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Eugenia Derbysheva
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable person, out of scope.
- File:VUHIN 04 1980.jpg
- File:Дербышева Евгения Константиновна 2007.jpg
- File:Дербышева Евгения Константиновна 2011.jpg
- File:Дербышева Евгения Константиновна 2019.jpg
- File:Дербышева Евгения Константиновна в фартуке «Правила настоящей хозяйки».jpg
- File:Дербышевы и Фролов.jpg
- File:Симонова Виктория (1).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- 1 file Undeleted per UDR since it was in use by Russian Wikipedia. Abzeronow (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
There are so many good French fry pictures in COMMONS, what is the need for AI? 191.126.44.131 02:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unused and unlikely to be used, so out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Just a little
Comment, by the way: unregistered / anonymous users should not be allowed to start DR on Commons. Fma12 (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- As long as the comments / DR reasons are constructive, there's no reason not to. Palemeditation (talk) 20:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Just a little
- Delete Per nom Palemeditation (talk) 20:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
There are so many good French fry pictures in COMMONS, what is the need for AI? 191.126.44.131 02:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unused and unlikely to be used, so out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom Palemeditation (talk) 20:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Some files in Category:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso
[edit]No FOP in Italy. Work of Richard Meier, still alive.
- File:Campanile 02.JPG
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 02.jpg
- File:Contrasto tra architettura e quotidianità 12.JPG
- File:Facciata 14.JPG
- File:Il quartiere si riflette in una vetrata 05.JPG
- File:Il quartiere si riflette in una vetrata.JPG
- File:La chiesa come centro del quartiere 01.JPG
- File:La chiesa dalla piazza 03.JPG
- File:Le vele 11.JPG
- File:Le vele 13.JPG
- File:Le vele.JPG
- File:Retro della chiesa 10.JPG
José Luiz disc 01:51, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The said subject is part of Cultural Heritage of Italy (http://www.beniculturali.it/mibac/export/MiBAC/sito-MiBAC/Contenuti/Eventi/GrandiEventi/visualizza_asset.html_1945641628.html) and authorized by the Italian Ministry for Culture - The subject also contested in 2014 Wiki Loves Monuments SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Italian copyright law doesn't grant freedom of panorama for almost anything. This building's designer, w:Richard Meier, is still alive. Cultural heritage privilege doesn't mean it is no longer copyrighted, and having WLM tag doesn't mean these underwent proper COM:OTRS permission from Meier for the use of commercial licensing. See also one failed undeletion request at: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-03#File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso roma.JPG.
- File:0580915466 a.jpg
- File:0580915466 b.jpg
- File:0580915466 c.jpg
- File:07544-Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:07546-Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:07572-Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:23092017-DSC 6034.jpg
- File:23092017-DSC 6048.jpg
- File:Altar - Igreja do Jubileu.jpg
- File:Architetture al vento 2.jpg
- File:Assemblaggio.jpg
- File:Avvolti dalle curve.jpg
- File:Cammino verso l'altare.JPG
- File:Campanile 02.JPG
- File:Chiesa delle vele (vista 1).jpg
- File:Chiesa delle vele (vista 2).jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso (retro).jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso - Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso - Tor Tre Teste - Roma Arch. Richard Meier.JPG
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.00.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.10.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.15.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.30.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.40.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso Rome.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso-Piazza Terzo Millennio.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso (lato retro).jpeg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso - fronte.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso - lato.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso - retro.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso Roma.jpeg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso, Rome.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 01.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 02.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 03.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 04.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 05.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 06.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 07.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 08.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 09.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 10.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 11.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 12.jpg
- File:Chiesa Dio Padre Misericordioso- Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa Dio Padre Misericordioso.jpg
- File:Chiesa Parrocchiale Dio Padre Misericordioso (Dives in Misericordia) - esterno.jpg
- File:Chiesa Parrocchiale Dio Padre Misericordioso (Dives in Misericordia) - interno.jpg
- File:Contrasto tra architettura e quotidianità 12.JPG
- File:Dal basso verso il cielo.JPG
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 1.jpg
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 5.tif
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 7.jpg
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 9.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.1bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.1co - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.2bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.2co - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.3bn- © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.4bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Entrata principale della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:Facciata 14.JPG
- File:Il quartiere si riflette in una vetrata 05.JPG
- File:Il quartiere si riflette in una vetrata.JPG
- File:Il tramonto sulla chiesa.JPG
- File:Interno - altare maggiore.JPG
- File:Interno Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:IT-Rom-dives-in-mis-1.jpg
- File:IT-Rom-dives-in-mis-2.jpg
- File:L'immergersi.jpg
- File:La chiesa al tramonto.JPG
- File:La chiesa come centro del quartiere 01.JPG
- File:La chiesa dalla piazza 03.JPG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 1.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 10.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 11.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 12.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 13.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 14.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 15.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 16.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 17.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 18.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 19.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 2.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 20.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 21.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 22.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 23.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 24.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 25.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 27.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 28.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 29.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 3.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 30.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 31.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 4.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 5.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 6.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 7.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 8.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 9.PNG
- File:Le vele 11.JPG
- File:Le vele 13.JPG
- File:Le vele immobili.JPG
- File:Le vele verso il tramonto.JPG
- File:Le vele.JPG
- File:Luce divina - chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.jpg
- File:Misericordia Roma.jpg
- File:Mondo Nuovo.jpg
- File:Neve e misericordia.JPG
- File:Opera di fede vetro e cemento.JPG
- File:Organo e sedute della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:Particolare Campanile della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:Particolare laterale architettonico.jpg
- File:Pellegrinaggio d'autunno.jpg
- File:Preghiera e architettura.jpg
- File:Purificazione.jpg
- File:Retro della chiesa 10.JPG
- File:Silenzi - Chiesa per il nuovo Millennio.jpg
- File:Sopra l'altare.JPG
- File:Tre vele ed una chiesa.JPG
- File:VCA8854.jpg
- File:VCA8856.jpg
- File:VCA8858.jpg
- File:VCA8871.jpg
- File:VCA8873.jpg
- File:VCA8878.jpg
- File:VCA8880.jpg
- File:VCA8886.jpg
- File:VCA8905.jpg
- File:VCA8909.jpg
- File:VCA8919.jpg
- File:VCA8920.jpg
- File:VCA8921.jpg
- File:VCA8928.jpg
- File:VCA8937.jpg
- File:VCA8961.jpg
- File:Veleggiare verso la Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:Vista Esterna della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:WikiokDSC 9499.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the church can be photographed under Creative Commons license. There is a WLM permission (wiki-ID: 580915466). Ruthven (msg) 06:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The church was completed in 2003 by Richard Meier (1934–). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy, permission from him is required.
- File:0580915466 a.jpg
- File:0580915466 b.jpg
- File:0580915466 c.jpg
- File:07544-Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:07546-Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:07572-Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:23092017-DSC 6034.jpg
- File:23092017-DSC 6048.jpg
- File:Architetture al vento 2.jpg
- File:Assemblaggio.jpg
- File:Avvolti dalle curve.jpg
- File:Campanile 02.JPG
- File:Chiesa delle vele (vista 1).jpg
- File:Chiesa delle vele (vista 2).jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso (retro).jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso - Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso - Tor Tre Teste - Roma Arch. Richard Meier.JPG
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.00.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.10.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.15.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.30.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso ore 17.40.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso Rome.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso-Piazza Terzo Millennio.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso (lato retro).jpeg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso - fronte.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso - lato.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso - retro.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso Roma.jpeg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso, Rome.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 01.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 02.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 03.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 04.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 05.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 06.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 07.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 08.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 09.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 10.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 11.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 12.jpg
- File:Chiesa Dio Padre Misericordioso- Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa Dio Padre Misericordioso.jpg
- File:Chiesa Parrocchiale Dio Padre Misericordioso (Dives in Misericordia) - esterno.jpg
- File:Chiesa Parrocchiale Dio Padre Misericordioso (Dives in Misericordia) - interno.jpg
- File:Contrasto tra architettura e quotidianità 12.JPG
- File:Crocefisso sotto il cielo.jpg
- File:Crocifisso della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:Crucifixo - Igreja do Jubileu.jpg
- File:Dal basso verso il cielo.JPG
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 1.jpg
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 5.tif
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 7.jpg
- File:Dio padre misericordioso 9.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.1bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.1co - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.2bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.2co - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.3bn- © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.4bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Entrata principale della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:Facciata 14.JPG
- File:Il quartiere si riflette in una vetrata 05.JPG
- File:Il quartiere si riflette in una vetrata.JPG
- File:Il tramonto sulla chiesa.JPG
- File:Interno - altare maggiore.JPG
- File:Interno - Crocefisso.JPG
- File:Interno Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:IT-Rom-dives-in-mis-1.jpg
- File:IT-Rom-dives-in-mis-2.jpg
- File:L'immergersi.jpg
- File:La chiesa al tramonto.JPG
- File:La chiesa come centro del quartiere 01.JPG
- File:La chiesa dalla piazza 03.JPG
- File:La croce immersa nella luce.JPG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 1.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 10.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 11.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 12.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 17.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 18.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 19.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 2.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 20.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 21.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 22.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 23.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 24.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 27.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 28.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 29.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 3.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 30.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 31.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 4.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 5.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 6.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 7.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 8.PNG
- File:Largo Terzo Millennio 9.PNG
- File:Le vele 11.JPG
- File:Le vele 13.JPG
- File:Le vele di Meier in costruzione 1996-2003 Roma.jpg
- File:Le vele immobili.JPG
- File:Le vele verso il tramonto.JPG
- File:Le vele.JPG
- File:Luce del mondo.jpg
- File:Misericordia Roma.jpg
- File:Mondo Nuovo.jpg
- File:Neve e misericordia.JPG
- File:Opera di fede vetro e cemento.JPG
- File:Organo e sedute della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:Particolare Campanile della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:Particolare laterale architettonico.jpg
- File:Pellegrinaggio d'autunno.jpg
- File:Purificazione.jpg
- File:Retro della chiesa 10.JPG
- File:Silenzi - Chiesa per il nuovo Millennio.jpg
- File:Sopra l'altare.JPG
- File:Tre vele ed una chiesa.JPG
- File:VCA8854.jpg
- File:VCA8856.jpg
- File:VCA8858.jpg
- File:VCA8871.jpg
- File:VCA8873.jpg
- File:VCA8878.jpg
- File:VCA8880.jpg
- File:VCA8886.jpg
- File:VCA8905.jpg
- File:VCA8909.jpg
- File:VCA8919.jpg
- File:VCA8920.jpg
- File:VCA8921.jpg
- File:VCA8928.jpg
- File:VCA8937.jpg
- File:VCA8961.jpg
- File:VCA8979.jpg
- File:Veleggiare verso la Dives in misericordia.jpg
- File:Vista Esterna della Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.JPG
- File:WikiokDSC 9499.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per above. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
There is no FoP in Italy and Italy has a standard of life + 70 years. The buildings architect is Richard Meier and he is still alive. In the category header it states that there should not be uploaded files of the building if they are not de minimis. In the files nominated, the church is in focus.
- File:Avvolti dalle curve.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso (retro).jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso - Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso - Tor Tre Teste - Roma Arch. Richard Meier.JPG
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso Rome.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso (lato retro).jpeg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso - fronte.jpg
- File:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordoso Roma.jpeg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 01.jpg
- File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso 11.jpg
- File:Chiesa Dio Padre Misericordioso- Roma.jpg
- File:Chiesa Dio Padre Misericordioso.jpg
- File:Chiesa Parrocchiale Dio Padre Misericordioso (Dives in Misericordia) - esterno.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.1bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.1co - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.2bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.2co - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.3bn- © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
- File:Dives in Misericordia - ph.4bn - © Giuseppe Boni.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Withdraw my nomination per above. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have also added the info regarding previous DRs in the category to prevent further DRs. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lukas wiki Purranque (talk · contribs)
[edit]User with bad history, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Barco Purranque.jpg
- File:Conos-plaza-de-Purranque-1.jpg
- File:CAMPO-PURRANQUE-6.jpg
- File:Teatro-municipal-de-purranque.-1.jpg
- File:Hospital Purranque antiguo.png
- File:Parroquia San Sebastián Purranque.jpg
- File:Ala de Exposiciones Purranque.jpg
- File:Colegio Preciosa Sangre.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: We should never use AI images of real people because they will always be inaccurate. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This doesn't even appear to be an accurate depiction - all of the photos of Parsai on Google Images show him with more hair, no glasses, and a much less "round" head than seen in this image. Omphalographer (talk) 22:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. Zafer (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused file, no educational value, out of scope. Zafer (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 22:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shira Shimona (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsensical AI-generated diagrams of electricity which include meaningless letters and icons in the floating spheres, and randomly placed gibberish text ("Pocina ohage, Clear elarge, Negtino chagies").
Belbury (talk) 08:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Bom dia, não são ilustrações técnicas, muito menos para ensino superior, apenas ilustrações em 3D, com uso de IA generativa para o ensino fundamental e médio, cuja a categoria é Física básica simplificada. Isso, para estimular jovens estudantes a se interessarem pelo tema, a produzirem conteúdos próprios com o apoio de uma IA generativa e adiante, quiça, aprofundarem-se no tema de forma mais técnica, avançada. Conforme nota do Commmos: "De acordo com o escopo do projeto Commons , apenas mídias que sejam realisticamente úteis para um propósito educacional devem ser hospedadas no Commons.
- <meta />
- Shira Shimona (talk) 10:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Images with this many extraneous details are not educationally useful. Even if someone took the time to blur out all of the meaningless letters and symbols and captions, rubbing a glass rod on wool does not produce this kind of visible electrical discharge. Belbury (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Nor does "rubbing a glass rod on wool" mean placing the rod on a bolt of woolen cloth and rubbing the rod with one's hands, which is what appears to be happening in the second image. Creating an accurate illustration of these activities, either by taking a photograph, making a drawing, or (ugh) prompting an AI should not be difficult. These images, quite frankly, confuse the viewer more than they educate. Omphalographer (talk) 18:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Images with this many extraneous details are not educationally useful. Even if someone took the time to blur out all of the meaningless letters and symbols and captions, rubbing a glass rod on wool does not produce this kind of visible electrical discharge. Belbury (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Scientifically misleading and therefore outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 17:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per consensus. Not in use. -- Geagea (talk) 23:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of cleaned up file NZ8_4493. Please delete this file. Bengt Nyman (talk) 09:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravikumar1993 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission from the photographer(s), and may be out of scope.
- File:AFC Asian Cup Qatar 2023.jpg
- File:WebSummitQatar 2024.jpg - https://www.linkedin.com/in/basithjm/ -- Geagea (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Sky Tamil Awards.jpg - https://www.slembassy-qatar.com/category/news/embassy_news/ -- Geagea (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Yann (talk) 16:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 08:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found elsewhere using Google Images. Renominate as "out of scope" once draft article has been deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Draft article has been deleted. Now an unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Is this what you call OOS? 186.172.221.186 00:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
It's a modern book cover with no VRTS. Prosfilaes (talk) 02:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Clearly part of this set attributed to professional photographer Agnest Riansyah. Evidence of permission needed. Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; uploader's been blocked so I doubt that permissions gonna come. Queen of Hearts (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Category:Men smiling with teeth? 186.174.91.156 01:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Very much out of scope. If he's a user I'm Jimbo. 191.126.44.131 03:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
The use of the 21st century's geopolitical situation to demonstrate a history timeline is inaccurate. 14.169.127.130 07:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I oppose deletion .please use registered User ID forsuggesting such deletion request .
- 2.please give citation reference to your reason message. Guglani (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- As per above.
- I don't understand the motivation "The use of the 21st century's geopolitical situation to demonstrate a history timeline is inaccurate.", no one is saying that map shows a history timeline. So keep. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not sure I understand the issue here. It's quite common to use modern country names, boundaries, and cities as points of reference in historical maps. Omphalographer (talk) 18:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:56, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
out of project scope, no permission used for promo article for a toyshop of this name on nl wiki, copyvio without permission from https://kadoing.shop/ Hoyanova (talk) 08:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JBW as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a logo of the San Miguel Corporation, and the uploader's claims that it is their own work and that they own the copyright are false. Probably PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 10:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- This logo does contain more than just text, but I'm not a expert on U.S. copyright law, and I don't know how much more than just text is needed. JBW (talk) 08:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Clearly below COM:TOO US. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Deeply confused AI-generated image which seems to be conflating a plasma ball (an enclosed transparent sphere you can put your hands on to generate soft lines of plasma) with a Tesla coil (a metal torus with visible high-voltage radiating discharge) and a Van Der Graaff generator (a metal dome that causes hair to stand on end when touched with no visible discharge). The depicted object and electrical process does not exist. Belbury (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete generic “pretty” AI image that misrepresents its subject;
in use but could easily be replaced by something actually useful and educationalupdate: deleted from Portuguese Wikipedia; now only used in a user gallery Dronebogus (talk) 10:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:The Squirrel Conspiracy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
This file shows a picture of me that I have not authorised for publication and that has been uploaded without my consent. 2A00:801:57D:28AE:9C25:234F:E011:9EAC 14:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This is an extract from another, properly licensed image. That image is from an advertisement poster, so you certainly agreed to that image. Extracts are always allowed as part of a CC license. PaterMcFly (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep We do not know who wrote this deletion request. And there is no violation of any law or Wikimedia-Commons regulation involved. This could just as well be someone else trying to get a lovely portrait of Ms. Ridderstedt removed. If it were certain that it is actually she requesting this and (and) if the photo were not a fine image of her during her brief cabaret career in 2011, I might consider supporting this request. Please note the (and). --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaboneka Paul (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Source? Country? Permission? Yann (talk) 16:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. It looks {{Pd-simple}} but there's no context for where it's from or whether it's real or fictional (the user's other uploads have included a lot of Doctor Who copyvios). No reverse image search results, no usage on any projects. Belbury (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Info This logo has since been used on en:The Blue Party as the logo of an article whose entire text content was The Blue Party is politician party. The party leader has been Alex Bickerton since 2022. It was founded by Alex Bickerton. The party’s deputy is Lauren Louise, overwriting the redirect that was previously there (and which I've restored). I can't see any evidence that this party exists in the real world. Belbury (talk) 17:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alex Bickerton and en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Golightly suggest a hoax (Note that the hoaxes always involve Alexander/Alex Bickerton and Lauren/Laura Blake in some form). The Commons uploader also uploaded File:TheLaRusso.jpg around the time of en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The LaRussos (TV series), seems like User:Contrilab is the upload account for a hoaxer that uses 92.40.* IPs on enwiki.
Speedy delete as a hoax. Belbury (talk) 17:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alex Bickerton and en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Golightly suggest a hoax (Note that the hoaxes always involve Alexander/Alex Bickerton and Lauren/Laura Blake in some form). The Commons uploader also uploaded File:TheLaRusso.jpg around the time of en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The LaRussos (TV series), seems like User:Contrilab is the upload account for a hoaxer that uses 92.40.* IPs on enwiki.
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
نسخه دیگری از آن موجود است و این اصلی نیست Tabari Boy (talk) 16:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose it's not a reason! The flag hasn't any problem.
- Ταπυροι (گپ) 20:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File is in use. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of nonfree art by Aki Hamaji. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 16:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Graffiti - Popeye, Felix the Cat, Fred Astaire, Charlie Chaplin - Turnpike Lane, London.png
[edit]The freedom of panorama in the UK doesn't apply to murals (2D "graphic works"). Günther Frager (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Mobile billboard for Liverpool Community Independents parliamentary candidate Sam Gorst.png
[edit]The freedom of panorama in the UK doesn't cover 2D graphical works. Moreover, temporary works are never covered in FoP. Günther Frager (talk) 17:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: AI-generated image of gigantic crystals of "blue gold", possibly a hoax or fantasy content. Omphalographer (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, not in use (and thus most likely out of scope), per nomination. Renerpho (talk) 06:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Relevant discussion is happening at Wikiproyecto discusión:Antivandalismo#WP:HOAX, per Wikimedia Commons. Renerpho (talk) 05:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement https://www.instagram.com/detective.norton_fbi/ EROY (talk) 19:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright, see metadata. // Kakan spelar (talk) 20:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:EugeneZelenko. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
FC Barcelona photo! 191.125.7.24 21:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete copyrighted stock photo: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/barcelona-jan-29-peter-gonzalez-action-2138732531 0x0a (talk) 08:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Logo copyrighted by Rede Globo Vitor Hello? 22:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
no permission see metadata "Author MICHEL VELDERMAN Copyright holder MICHEL VELDERMAN" Hoyanova (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
file with no license. Previous Cc-by license seems improbable. Jarekt (talk) 00:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false claims by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Eric Metzner - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; EXIF contradicts uploader's claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
False 'own work' claim. This is web sourced and uncredited, sources could be:
https://sabadejlah.com/what-is-a-globe-valve/
https://business.moglix.com/catalog/mro/valves/globe-valve?msn=msn153vrv7yyk3
https://jitaivalve2021.en.made-in-china.com/product/gdZtjyqKpRVM/China-Hand-Operated-2-Inch-Ss-Y-Type-Jacketed-Globe-Valve-for-Chemical-Acid.html
https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/J44-Series-Carbon-Steel-Stainless-Steel_1600472346469.html?spm=a2700.7724857.0.0.144026adpeLmrm Andy Dingley (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: reverse image search shows multiple versions online years before uploader's claimed date of creation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
The source website doesnt provide CC license for its images. 106.51.178.51 10:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
No meaningful content This looks like a failed upload. Malcolma (talk) 13:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Keine Rlevanz, DE:WP Artikel gelöscht. NDG (talk) 13:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep there are no relevance criteria (aka de:Wikipedia:Relevanzkriterien) on commons. usage at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q42734377 & Category:Maschinenfabrik Brück & https://de.everybodywiki.com/M._Br%C3%BCck. the deletion of the de:M. Brück article has no impact on commons, these are different projects and commons is used by another wikis like the everybodywiki too. --ɱ
13:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
![9 File:StableDiffusion- Negative Prompt grid "signature".png](#File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"signature".png){kind=link}
![10 File:StableDiffusion- Negative Prompt grid "logo".png](#File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"logo".png){kind=link}
![11 File:StableDiffusion- Negative Prompt grid "stock photo watermark".png](#File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"stock_photo_watermark".png){kind=link}
![12 File:StableDiffusion- Negative Prompt grid "face pixelization".png](#File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"face_pixelization".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![05:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-MrAlanKoh-20240704050300-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"signature".png){kind=link}
![06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-The_Squirrel_Conspiracy-20240704060400-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"signature".png){kind=link}
![05:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-MrAlanKoh-20240704050400-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"logo".png){kind=link}
![06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-The_Squirrel_Conspiracy-20240704060400-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"logo".png){kind=link}
![05:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-MrAlanKoh-20240704050400-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"stock_photo_watermark".png){kind=link}
![06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-The_Squirrel_Conspiracy-20240704060400-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"stock_photo_watermark".png){kind=link}
![05:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-MrAlanKoh-20240704050400-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"face_pixelization".png){kind=link}
![06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/07/04#c-The_Squirrel_Conspiracy-20240704060400-File:StableDiffusion-_Negative_Prompt_grid_"face_pixelization".png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_esterno.jpg){kind=link}
_-_interno.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Fake own work claim and date of creation, copyright status is unclear. Romano1981 (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- What made you doubt ticket #2017120710012171 ? --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- The correspondence and all necessary details are available to trusted volunteers via ticket #2017120710012171. If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard. Wavepainter (talk) 23:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: file with VRT ticket. If you are in doubt about this ticket, please ask at the COM:VRTN. --Wdwd (talk) 05:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Alexandr Sorokin
[edit]Fake descriptions, date of creation, author's name and license. These are not modern works OTRS permission is about, but derivatives with non-clear copyright status.
- File:Last Address Sign - Moscow, Malaya Dmitrovka Street, 18 (2018-12-23) 16.jpg
- Leave. The license was indicated with only a minor error. I have corrected --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 14:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Last Address sign - Moscow, Staromonetny Lane, 33 (2020-09-25) 15.jpg
- Leave. The license was indicated with only a minor error. I have corrected --Воскресенский Петр ([[User talk:Воскресенский Петр|
- File:Last Address sign - Moscow, Staromonetny Lane, 33 (2020-09-25) 17.jpg
- Leave. The license was indicated with only a minor error. I have corrected --Воскресенский Петр ([[User talk:Воскресенский Петр|
- File:Last Address Sign - Moscow, Strastnoy Boulevard, 8 (2018-12-23) 01.jpg
- Here the license is not clear --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 14:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
_16.jpg){kind=link}
_15.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Quick1984 (talk) 03:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- И отдельная просьба быть
снисходительнееуважительнее к участникам с приличным вкладом ивозрастом, а не расставлять запросы абсурдно --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- И отдельная просьба быть
Kept: all files have an author specific Template:Alexandr Sorokin (Last Address). If in doubt about the usage of this template or about the VRT ticket, please ask as a first step at the COM:VRTN (VRT notiveboard). --Wdwd (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wdwd, if you at least look at these particular files, chosen from the huge set of photos by this uploader, you can see, that these are not own photos, but derivatives of other people works. --Quick1984 (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It’s made by Mike Ter Maat and his team. Conflict of Interest. Clayton Odom Jr. (talk) 06:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
KEEP: Used on a few Wikipedia pages. LordBirdWord (talk) 10:55, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio, web copy without permission. Affect also File:Park - stand 2E.jpg (uncropped version). --Wdwd (talk) 05:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio (c) Alexander Gerhardt - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Redundant to: File:YouTube social white squircle.svg. 0x0a (talk) 09:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Invented and non-original logo. InterComMan (talk) 10:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
That's an illustration of VR's new train. The picture is unlikely licensed for free use. [1] Puppe100 (talk) 11:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © ted bergland - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung, der Urheber soll "Premio Eugenio Garza Sada" sein - das ist aber nicht möglich, da Urheber immer nur eine natürliche Person sein kann Lutheraner (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There is no information on the source website (now dead, but archived close to the upload date) about the photographer. I'd guess the photo was taken around 1970. It's definitely not old enough for the copyright to have expired even if the photographer had died the day it was taken. There's also no indication on their website that PEGS intended to release anything under a CC license. Renerpho (talk) 07:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rhodewarrick471 (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://www.sahistory.org.za/policy - """""Please note that these externally created materials on the site are protected by South African copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or otherwise published in any format, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner."""""" it is not actually free licensed.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- delete it Rhodewarrick471 (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- please delete it Rhodewarrick471 (talk) 19:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rhodewarrick471 (talk · contribs)
[edit]School photos and logos with bogus CC and PD claims. User has a history of copyvios and is currently blocked
- File:Worcester Gymnasium emblem (1992-present).png
- File:Staff of Boy's High, 1970.jpg
- File:Girl's High Matrics , 1963.jpg
- File:Past principal, Engelbrecht in 1954.jpg
- File:Montana High, Matrics 1978.jpg
- File:Staff of Boys High, 1938.jpg
- File:Worcester High School Staff 1972.jpg
- File:Worcester Boys High Athletics - 1968.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Still frames from L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo published in Italy in 1970. Still frames are protected by 20 years in Italy, and are indeed in the Italian public domain. However, the film was also published in in the US with a copyright notice [2] and it was registered in 1989 [3]. Thus, the usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect because the film was copyrighted in the US at URAA time. We can undelete in 2066 when the film enters in the US public domain.
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Eva Renzi 1.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Eva Renzi 2.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Eva Renzi 3.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Eva Renzi 4.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Hornitus nevalis.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Quadro di Berto Consalvi (cropped).png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Quadro di Berto Consalvi.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Reggie Nalder.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Rosita Torosh 1.png
- File:L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo (1970) Rosita Torosh 2.png
- File:Raho L'uccello dalle piume di cristallo.png
- File:Umberto Raho.png
_Eva_Renzi_1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Eva_Renzi_2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Eva_Renzi_3.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Eva_Renzi_4.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hornitus_nevalis.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Quadro_di_Berto_Consalvi_(cropped).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Quadro_di_Berto_Consalvi.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Reggie_Nalder.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Rosita_Torosh_1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Rosita_Torosh_2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Günther Frager (talk) 09:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
poor quality, picture is too blurry, there are better pictures of the same object in the Category:Bereziniak botanic reserve Luda.slominska (talk) 13:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation - see https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/sanju-samson-stamps-his-class-as-india-a-take-series-4-1/articleshow/71020924.cms Larry Hockett (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 18:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
source file from which this image was extracted is deleted. Gpkp (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Cedric Sprick - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
request a deletion discussion Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep -- those images are taken by my in-person camera. It is part of the news. Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 11:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Simply being taken by your camera does not make your image allowable on Commons, as in your case, the file is derivative work that contains copyrighted material, which is not allowable on Commons. Neither journalist or news material enters the public domain immediately after publication: they are subject to the same copyright law requirements, and you can easily found words like "Copyrighted — all rights reserved" in news websites.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Update: Uploader is requesting VRT permission from the copyright holders (i.e. the respective political parties).廣九直通車 (talk) 13:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- still waiing for their reply. Thx for ur time! Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs VRT, DW of copyrighted photos etc. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no source, false langauge for description, misleading title, unclear what it shows Prototyperspective (talk) 17:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyright? This single contribution of the user is not own work. See here. From a Dutch perspective, the filename "bierneger" (beer nigger) is a swear word, the description "bier" (beer) is not what the image shows and the username "Wikikankerpedia" is not an appropriate name. Wouter (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, found on shutterstock. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
An official render by the promotion WWE. No copyright free HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, self promotional image; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Promotional photos of honorable yet non-notable subject, judging by by the uploader's sandbox on enwiki and a Google search. Only one of the photos is in use, and only in said sandbox. Potentially F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). (Also, I think it's in good taste not to keep private photos of children who likely did not consent to being publicized like this, especially when the photo in question isn't educationally useful, but that view doesn't align with any Commons policy that I'm aware of. Please let me know if I'm wrong.)
Sinigh (talk) 21:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eien20 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 21:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
No metadata available which would confirm indeed that it's own work, while the photo itself seems to be widely used by different media outlets. Also, there seems to be some form of similiarity with another similar case with another file uploaded by the same user. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Keep for now. A google search shows dates of 2020 and later - after this photo was uploaded. We would need proof it was published online prior to 2017. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
The Eni logo exceeds the COM:TOO Italy, which - although it is actually high in Italy - covers simple geometric figures (as for the Inter and Milan logos), but not more complex figures such as animals. Some other Eni logos on Commons are currently subject to DR for the same reason. Arrow303 (talk) 11:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, for the reason already stated by Arrow303 OttavianoUrsu (talk) 12:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I feel this may seem it's a duplicate of the file named File:Flag_of_Oland.svg. I do not think we actually need duplicate files of SVGs. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 02:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Admins, you can keep it if you want. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 00:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not an accurate version anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Fərqanə Abdullayeva (talk · contribs)
[edit]1–2: The "Füzuli" images are photographs of what I assume is copyrightable material.
3–5: The three close-up portraits raised suspicion because of their general fetched-from-the-internet look; why would you upload such low-res, awkwardly resized and/or uncropped images if they're your own work?
6: The larger portrait is used elsewhere on the internet, but not on websites that definitively predate the Commons upload, but I still think it warrants investigation or precaution because of the suspicious nature of the user's other uploads.
- File:Füzuli Rayon Ziyalıları kitabı.jpg
- File:Füzuli Rayon Ziyalıları.jpg
- File:FarganaAbdullayeva.jpg
- File:Cabbar Abdullayev.jpg
- File:Fərqanə.jpg
- File:Fargana.jpg
Sinigh (talk) 10:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Irredentist flag map, unused and not possible to use in NPOV education. Better flag maps exist in "Category:Greater Israel", and also File:Israel Flag-map (including Area C).svg. Enyavar (talk) 10:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Likely copyvio. I haven't found the image anywhere else, but it seems unlikely that it really is a self-portrait. + Not in use. Sinigh (talk) 12:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
poor quality image of no encyclopedic value (we have lots of quality abseiling images) Aszx5000 (talk) 12:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
This file is from X (Twitter) and its copyright status is unknown. Pierre cb (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Participarea membrilor delegației Parlamentului Republicii Moldova la Sesiunea anuală a AP OSCE (2024-07-02)
[edit]Although the source Flickr stream publishes under CC0, these four files have a copyright notice in the EXIF and are not work of the Moldovan Parliament.
- File:02.07.2024 Participarea membrilor delegației Parlamentului Republicii Moldova la Sesiunea anuală a AP OSCE - 53829904874.jpg
- File:02.07.2024 Participarea membrilor delegației Parlamentului Republicii Moldova la Sesiunea anuală a AP OSCE - 53830050946.jpg
- File:02.07.2024 Participarea membrilor delegației Parlamentului Republicii Moldova la Sesiunea anuală a AP OSCE - 53830291043.jpg
- File:02.07.2024 Participarea membrilor delegației Parlamentului Republicii Moldova la Sesiunea anuală a AP OSCE - 53830483390.jpg
Gikü (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:02.07.2024 Participarea membrilor delegației Parlamentului Republicii Moldova la Sesiunea anuală a AP OSCE - 53831453022.jpg has the same issue. Gikü (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded a few duplicates by mistake Pdanese (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded a few duplicates by mistake Pdanese (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Same logo, but since this file needed to be converted from a png file to an svg file, File:Wuthering Waves Japanese Logo.svg was uploaded, resulting in two duplicate png and svg files. SKTakek (talk) 13:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Looks loke a professional work, I really doubt this is the work of the uploader, compared to othere uploaded images Avron (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
no evidence of pd-us on the source Avron (talk) 13:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
not own work, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ak12_5.45.jpg Avron (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused, near-duplicate of File:0164jfKalayaan Flyover EDSA Fort Bonifacio Buendia Flyover Makati Cityfvf 06.jpg. COM:REDUNDANT. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Too dark and unusable. There are better images in the category that meaningfully depict the flyover.
- File:0128jfKalayaan Flyover EDSA Fort Bonifacio Buendia Flyover Makati Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:0128jfKalayaan Flyover EDSA Fort Bonifacio Buendia Flyover Makati Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:0128jfKalayaan Flyover EDSA Fort Bonifacio Buendia Flyover Makati Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:0128jfKalayaan Flyover EDSA Fort Bonifacio Buendia Flyover Makati Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:0128jfKalayaan Flyover EDSA Fort Bonifacio Buendia Flyover Makati Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:0128jfKalayaan Flyover EDSA Fort Bonifacio Buendia Flyover Makati Cityfvf 15.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. They are dark because these are really the only images which are taken from underneath the flyover. The darkness might make them less aesthetically pleasing photos in a compositional sense, but they accurately portray a unique perspective. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image that shows same information as File:Cap Elizabeth, Maine (6730203147).jpg Nv8200p (talk) 15:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Redundant, now that I uploaded a new version which is just shot in better lighting.
250px מקף־עברי (talk) 16:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- מקף־עברי, We can keep them both if you are the author. -- Geagea (talk) 23:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality version of File:Aplocnemus impressus (Marsham, 1802) (28562080274).png. If the file has to be rotated 90° it shouldn't be this low quality or in webp format Nutshinou Talk! 17:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
_(28562080274).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Liverpolitan1980
[edit]- File:Liverpool Pride Quarter (Oct 2023).jpg
- File:Liverpool Knowledge Quarter boundary and notable institutions.jpg
- File:Liverpool Ropewalks boundary and notable institutions.jpg
- File:Baltic Triangle and notable landmarks.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These files appear to use a background of (the old skin of) Google Maps as the background. See these old skin maps of the area for comparison.[4][5][6] Data can be compared to re-skinned Google Maps, or manually looking at the old one. Google Maps imagery is copyrighted and not released under a free license for use on commons. --DankJae 17:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Image copyrighted Mohammed Qays (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's my own translation and work based on a publicly available image, link: https://t.me/khodomonia_history/87
- Furthermore I have been permitted to post and or modify the following image.
- Care to explain what your problem is?
- Arabic: هذه ترجمتي الخاصة استنادًا إلى صورة متاحة علنًا، الرابط:
- هل تهتم بشرح ماهية مشكلتك؟
- Farsi (Persian): این ترجمهی خودم بر اساس یک تصویر عمومی موجود است، لینک:
- آیا مایل به توضیح مشکل شما هستید؟ Mrox2 (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 08:04, August 5, 2024, by Krd (No license since 28 July 2024). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jessivigia (talk · contribs)
[edit]these kinda look F10(personal photos of non contributors) to me. should we keep them or remove?
- File:Urbanizacion camino real.jpg
- File:Descanso cerca de las tuberias del desague.jpg
- File:Comenzando la excursion, salida centro cultural marianopicon salas.jpg
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there! We would like to clarify that the photos uploaded are not personal but rather a donation from a participant in an activity organized by a recognized user group. They capture the essence of the village community and its cultural heritage. Best, Galahad (sasageyo!) 23:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work anyway, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: AI-generated image of a forest. If "tepual" is a real type of forest (unclear given AI-generated text and irrelevant references in es:tepual), it should be illustrated with an actual picture of such a forest, not an imaginary one. Omphalographer (talk) 18:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- If the Spanish Wikipedia thinks it's in scope then it's in scope.
Keep per C:INUSE. As I said in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pomponal.jpg, I'd immediately remove it if this were the English Wikipedia, but I'm not involved with es.wikipedia, and I don't know their standards. The discussion about the removal of those images should start on the article talk pages where the images are used. Renerpho (talk) 06:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)- Relevant discussion is happening at Wikiproyecto discusión:Antivandalismo#WP:HOAX, per Wikimedia Commons. Renerpho (talk) 05:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Changing my vote to Delete, now that the image has been removed from the article on the Spanish Wikipedia. The article itself has been nominated for deletion. The image is no longer in use, and there's no reason to keep it. Renerpho (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- es:Tepual has been deleted as "original research, unsourced and non-encyclopedic writing". Renerpho (talk) 01:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: AI-generated image of a forest, similar to File:Tepual.jpg. Same reasoning applies here - if this is a real type of forest, it should be illustrated with a real image of such a forest, not a synthetic one. Omphalographer (talk) 18:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- If the Spanish Wikipedia thinks it's in scope then it's in scope.
Keep per C:INUSE. That said, if this were the English Wikipedia, I'd immediately remove it when I saw it. I don't know the inner workings of es:wikipedia though. Renerpho (talk) 06:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)- I agree. My spain is very bad, but this looks fishy. An article about some kind of rainforest that has no article in another language and for which one needs an AI image for illustration? Is this a fake article? PaterMcFly (talk) 13:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Relevant discussion is happening at Wikiproyecto discusión:Antivandalismo#WP:HOAX, per Wikimedia Commons. At least I hope it is happening (the Antivandalism Project on the Spanish Wikipedia seems to have been largely inactive for years). Renerpho (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Renerpho, it is better that you publish the message here, w:es:Wikipedia:Café/Archivo/Ayuda/Actual, so that your message has more visibility,, because in Spanish Wikipedia the Wikiprojects are somewhat abandoned. ZebaX2010 (talk) 07:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- @ZebaX2010: Done, thank you. I suspected that the Wikiproject was abandoned, but wasn't familiar enough with either the language or the page in general to navigate it successfully. Renerpho (talk) 07:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Renerpho, it is better that you publish the message here, w:es:Wikipedia:Café/Archivo/Ayuda/Actual, so that your message has more visibility,, because in Spanish Wikipedia the Wikiprojects are somewhat abandoned. ZebaX2010 (talk) 07:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Relevant discussion is happening at Wikiproyecto discusión:Antivandalismo#WP:HOAX, per Wikimedia Commons. At least I hope it is happening (the Antivandalism Project on the Spanish Wikipedia seems to have been largely inactive for years). Renerpho (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. My spain is very bad, but this looks fishy. An article about some kind of rainforest that has no article in another language and for which one needs an AI image for illustration? Is this a fake article? PaterMcFly (talk) 13:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Changing my vote to Delete, now that the image has been removed from the article on the Spanish Wikipedia. The article itself has been nominated for deletion. The image is no longer in use, and there's no reason to keep it. Renerpho (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- es:Pomponal has been deleted as an "essay without reliable sources and non-encyclopedic writing". Renerpho (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo was released on Flickr with a CC license by SPÖ (Social Democratic Party of Austria), however it contains a copyright notice crediting Parlamentsdirektion (Austrian Parliament), whose terms of use are not Commons compliant (limited non-commercial, no commercial reuse or modifications). This seems to me like COM:FLICKRWASHING: the Flickr account most likely does not have the ability to release the photo under a CC license, especially given that they elected to keep the copyright notice in the Flickr description. Consigned (talk) 08:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I imported this in good faith, do whatever you want. Ailura (talk) 10:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Swatjester as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.pgmprecision.com/en/sniper-rifles/ultima-ratio/ -- user has repeatedly violated copyright on this account as well as undisclosed alternate account User:ElliotVFR. PD-textlogo, but may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Regardless of whether it is PD-textlogo, (I would not call it as such), it was uploaded under an inappropriate license as the author's own work; it is definitively not, as it is listed at the source as "©PGM Precision 2018". Swatjester (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- It depends on the country of origin. It is certainly PD-textlogo in USA, but may not be elsewhere. Yann (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with the statement that it is "certainly PD-textlogo in USA" (that is not an obvious statement, and Commons has long abused the threshold of originality argument in ways that do not comply with U.S. case law) but that's besides the point as the operative country presumably would be France, where PGM Precision is based, their website is hosted, and their "general policies" claim as the jurisdiction for any applicable disputes; see, e.g. [7] (Machine translation: "In the event of a dispute, the parties shall seek a conciliation, possibly through the establishment of their respective professional organisations. If this conciliation seems impossible, “the dispute will be heard in court in the Duquel district court where the PGM PRECISION social security office is located”, it is to be addressed to Annecy.") And again, regardless, there is absolutely no indication that this is the author's own work, and a very clear contraindication against the inappropriate licensing under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Swatjester (talk) 05:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I fixed that, and I think it is fine in France too. Yann (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with the statement that it is "certainly PD-textlogo in USA" (that is not an obvious statement, and Commons has long abused the threshold of originality argument in ways that do not comply with U.S. case law) but that's besides the point as the operative country presumably would be France, where PGM Precision is based, their website is hosted, and their "general policies" claim as the jurisdiction for any applicable disputes; see, e.g. [7] (Machine translation: "In the event of a dispute, the parties shall seek a conciliation, possibly through the establishment of their respective professional organisations. If this conciliation seems impossible, “the dispute will be heard in court in the Duquel district court where the PGM PRECISION social security office is located”, it is to be addressed to Annecy.") And again, regardless, there is absolutely no indication that this is the author's own work, and a very clear contraindication against the inappropriate licensing under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Swatjester (talk) 05:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- It depends on the country of origin. It is certainly PD-textlogo in USA, but may not be elsewhere. Yann (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP (borderline above TOO). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Image has appeared in multiple websites: [8], [9]. No EXIF, so unlikely the work of uploader. Gpkp (talk) 19:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- The person MPM Menon is my father. This photo was sent to him for official usage as the Indian Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates. 2600:1700:D10:1C60:5D44:ADFF:6B44:CCA4 19:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment 2600:..CCA4 You should have commented using your account: Sandeepina, from which you uploaded the file. --Gpkp (talk) 09:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission from original author. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Frojereds IF logo.png. No use in keeping this one. Jonteemil (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe it's possible to handle it like a duplicate? Eventhough it's different MIME types. Jonteemil (talk) 22:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Not useful redirection 2605:8D80:545:E18B:1473:6131:3802:E1F3 22:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nothing wrong with this redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictitious flag that attempts to challenge the actual flag: File:Flag of Yugoslavia (1946-1992).svg. Serves no other purpose. –Vipz (talk) 23:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Delete, because it is in low resolution and not related to the actual file above.
- Güiseppi669 (talk) 11:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
request a deletion discussion Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- this letter is a public letter to parliament and as a part of the parliament document it is subjected to https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/open-parliament-licence/. Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 11:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination After double-checking with the licensing provisions of {{OPL}}, it is found that OPL directly applies to this file.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Additional information: After enlarging the file, it can be confirmed that the letter used the free version of crowned portcullis instead of the stylized and copyrighted one. Therefore, the last concern about coat of arms for OPL is cleared.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- thx mate. let me sum it up Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 15:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
{{Kept}}
- @Notepadplusplusplus: Please wait until an administrator close the deletion request. Generally an admin will intervene after 7 days. As long as I provide valid reasons, the file should be kept.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion per discussion and withdraw of nomination for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 13:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Not used and now a SVG version like recommended at File:Rossy logo.svg 158.58.190.83 17:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 13:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 158.58.190.83 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Not used and now a SVG version like recommended at File:Rossy logo.svg|subpage=File:Rossy logo.svg|year=2024|month=July|day=4 Yann (talk) 18:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. HouseBlaster (talk) 19:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 13:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roci0022
[edit]- File:Colegio St Margarets Calle 5 Norte 2.jpg
- File:Colegio St Margarets Bosques de Montemar 3.jpg
- File:Colegio St Margarets Bosques de Montemar 2.png
- File:Colegio St Margarets Calle 5 Norte 1.webp
- File:Colegio St Margarets Bosques de Montemar 1.jpg
- File:Colegio St Margarets Villa Hochschild 2.webp
- File:St Margarets Calle Limache 1.webp
- File:Colegio St Margarets Villa Hochschild 1.webp
In all cases, the uploader has correctly claimed these images come from the St. Margarets school website (https://www.stmargarets.cl/en/home/). They did not specify specific urls, but I have verified each of these images come from that site. However, in all case the upload incorrectly claimed a {{PD-US}} license. Frankly, the uploader doesn't seem to understand copyright and believes that simply because it's on the St. Margarets website, it's fair game and is in the public domain. This is clearly not the case. These are copyright violations. Some of these might have fallen into the public domain, but there's no certain way to ascertain this as we don't know the original publication of the images nor their dates of publication in their source country (Chile). Copyright violations, all of them. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted all but 1. 2 could be PD if they were published before 1962 but we don't have that info. Kept 1 that was definitely published in the 1940s. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Fake own work claim and date of creation, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 03:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed the wrong license --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA applies, undelete in 2044. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOO India InterComMan (talk) 08:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Per COM:TOO India, the threshold of originality is similar to that in the US. This is an exceptionally simple logo which consists only of text. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Parlamentsdirektion
[edit]Files with copyright notice crediting Parlamentsdirektion (Austrian Parliament). The Austrian Parliament terms of use explain that this copyright notice is not Commons compliant (COM:L) as it only allows limited non-commercial re-use and no commercial use or modifications.
Note, the last 3 files (one photo and and two logos) currently have {{PD-AustrianGov}} tag suggesting PD because they are "part of a law, ordinance or official decree issued by an Austrian federal or state authority, or because it is of predominantly official use" (COM:AUSTRIA), however I am suspicious of this because the publisher (Austrian Parliament) included a copyright notice which aligns with their terms of use.
- File:Werner Neubauer2011.jpg
- File:Deimek-Parlament.jpg
- File:Karlheinz Kopf 2014.jpg
- File:Auftaktveranstaltung zum Jubiläumsjahr 2005.jpg
- File:Reinhold Mitterlehner (2013).jpg
- File:Herbert Haupt (2007).jpg
- File:Oesterreichisches Parlament Logo 2019.png
- File:Logo Austrian Parliament 2023.svg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Consigned (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, NC-restricted and last three are not PD. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no FoP for interior views in Germany and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years. The buildings architect is Richard Meier and he is still alive.
- File:Frankfurt Museum Angewandte Kunst innen 01.jpg
- File:Innenansicht Museum Angewandte Kunst.JPG
- File:Innenansicht Rampe Museum Angewandte Kunst.jpg
- File:M-fak-innen-ffm001.jpg
- File:MAK-Frankfurt-Aufgang-2013-Ffm-568.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
request a deletion discussion Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- those images are taken by my in-person camera. It is part of the news. Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 11:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Simply being taken by your camera does not make your image allowable on Commons, as in your case, the file is derivative work that contains copyrighted material, which is not allowable on Commons. Neither journalist or news material enters the public domain immediately after publication: they are subject to the same copyright law requirements, and you can easily found words like "Copyrighted — all rights reserved" in news websites.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Update: Uploader is requesting VRT permission from the copyright holders (i.e. the respective political parties).廣九直通車 (talk) 13:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
request a deletion discussion Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- those images are taken by my in-person camera. It is part of the news. Notepadplusplusplus (talk) 11:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Simply being taken by your camera does not make your image allowable on Commons, as in your case, the file is derivative work that contains copyrighted material, which is not allowable on Commons. Neither journalist or news material enters the public domain immediately after publication: they are subject to the same copyright law requirements, and you can easily found words like "Copyrighted — all rights reserved" in news websites.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Update: Uploader is requesting VRT permission from the copyright holders (i.e. the respective political parties).廣九直通車 (talk) 13:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" claim, likely COM:NETCOPYVIO: low resolution, no EXIF, uploaded by a single-use account Wcam (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- The work is owned by me. It has a low resolution because high resolution was never accepted. I took a picture of the work and cut out some of the unrelated information by using Paint so there is no EXIF. Xzx1337 (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Barbarella (film)
[edit]Screenshot from trailer of Barbarella, published in 1968. The rationale used was {{PD-US-no notice}}, but it is incorrect. One can see in the trailer at 3:09 that it does have a copyright notice. According to Hirtle chart works published between 1964 and 1977 with copyright notice are protected for 95 years.
Günther Frager (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Is that trailer the original version? If it has been published earlier without a copyright notice, then it would still be PD. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Ixfd64: I used the same trailer from File:Fonda3.JPG that claimed it had no copyright notice. The other files didn't even bother to provide a link to the trailer. If you have further evidence. please provide it. I'm not going to engage in a "what if..." discussion. Günther Frager (talk) 19:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2064. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
This map appears to be based/using a style[10] very similar to the Ordinance Survey's commercial OS MasterMap Topography Layer map product, requiring a license. Likely not released with a free license, nor the one stated. Furthermore, unlikely to be mainly "own work", and another organisation Cadw has been given courtesy for some involvement. DankJae 17:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment, an anon at User talk:LiamGM#File:CadwBR078.jpg claimed to be seeking permission for this file from the original holder.
- DankJae 23:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Fake own work claim and license. The author Alexander Pekarev (d:Q21154353) died in 1979. Quick1984 (talk) 03:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Leave. Photo taken by the only son and heir --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I hereby firmly confirm once again (I don't understand why!) that I am the sole heir and owner of the copyright to all the works of my father Alexander Pekarev. This correspondence has been already reviewed in August 2015 by a VRT member and is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2021012510012461. And I have once again posted the document in question on my Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7809649755780576&set=pcb.7809661002446118. Thank you, Denis Pekarev — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:810D:1B80:301A:F8B2:D4C6:B4F8:1475 (talk) 07:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Their talk page states what their identity is, and has already been confirmed by VRT.
Speedy keep @Aafi: Abzeronow (talk) 21:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow, I'd want to add few comments here before the DR is closed. Regards, Aafi (talk) 06:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket allows Wavepainter to upload works by Denis Pekarev under CC BY-SA 4.0 at his discretion given that Denis must be credited as the author, which appears missing here. The ticket covers works by Denis as available on his Facebook page. Identity confirmation here seems something not relevant. It wasn't needed. Regards, Aafi (talk) 06:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow, I'd want to add few comments here before the DR is closed. Regards, Aafi (talk) 06:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Aafi: It sounds fair. Thank you. Wavepainter (talk) 09:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow and @Wavepainter: I just realised that it seems that this work would come under {{Heirs-license}} because it is not an own work of Denis. What do you think could be a possible fix? Regards, Aafi (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Aafi: and @Abzeronowː You are absolutely right, if you are talking about the diary - the author is father Alexander Pekarev. Now the author is Denis as the author of this photo. If you think it is necessary to list his Father as the author, we will do so. Thank you. Wavepainter (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow and @Wavepainter: I just realised that it seems that this work would come under {{Heirs-license}} because it is not an own work of Denis. What do you think could be a possible fix? Regards, Aafi (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Aafi: It sounds fair. Thank you. Wavepainter (talk) 09:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep identity confirmed as heir, so valid license. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: already reviewed for ownership of copyright. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 02:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Video game screenshot Free license at source, but what about the license of game (as derivative work). Yann (talk) 13:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- The game is not CC BY-SA, but the screenshots on the game's itch.io were released under that license. Is there any policy/precedent for situations like this?--Eldomtom2 (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep we have other free media that includes parts of an unfree work, example: File:A Clockwork Orange (1971) - Trailer.webm. If it’s legitimately licensed by the creator I see no reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. There are several cases of a screenshot being licensed as free without the whole game being such. This is also the case for the images on the article for VVVVVV. These specific pictures are free, though the rest of the game isn't. The license here is valid, given by the creator, so fine to me. Dronebogus's point above is accurate as well. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Screenshots are licensed by creator. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 02:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Video game screenshot Free license at source, but what about the license of game (as derivative work). Yann (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep we have other free media that includes parts of an unfree work, example: File:A Clockwork Orange (1971) - Trailer.webm. If it’s legitimately licensed by the creator I see no reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There are several cases of a screenshot being licensed as free without the whole game being such. This is also the case for the images on the article for VVVVVV. These specific pictures are free, though the rest of the game isn't. The license here is valid, given by the creator of the game, so fine to me. Dronebogus's point above is accurate as well. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Screenshots were released freely by author. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 02:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Video game screenshot Free license at source, but what about the license of game (as derivative work). Yann (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep we have other free media that includes parts of an unfree work, example: File:A Clockwork Orange (1971) - Trailer.webm. If it’s legitimately licensed by the creator I see no reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There are several cases of a screenshot being licensed as free without the whole game being such. This is also the case for the images on the article for VVVVVV. These specific pictures are free, though the rest of the game isn't. The license here is valid, given by the creator, so fine to me. Dronebogus's point above is accurate as well. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Screenshots were released freely by author. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 02:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
""""Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.
This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country. In order for Commons to host a file, it must be free in its home country and in the United States. Some countries, particularly other countries based on common law, have a lower threshold of originality than the United States."""" this is from en wiki, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Honor_of_Kings_logo.png . please Speedy delete.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @modern_primat
- If game or company logos from China cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons because the logo is copyrighted (even if the logo is only text), why don't you add a file deletion nomination to the logo of Oppo, Xiaomi, Vivo, Realme, Tencent, etc. logos? The brand I mentioned comes from China too. Astrinko (talk) 18:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- if these kind of images you had mentioned is actually cropped version of original version, i would put these in DR too. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Even though the logo I uploaded was a cut from the original version, as long as the file does not meet the copyright threshold, the file I uploaded entered the public domain. I don't think the Wikimedia Commons administrators removed the logo. There are still many Chinese company logos on Wikimedia Commons that are text only, but they have not been removed. Astrinko (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- show me an example please. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Look the logo File:Douyin wordmark.svg, that's the Chinese version of the TikTok application logo, even though the logo is in the form of text and the logo is cut from the original version, the logo is still on Wikimedia Commons and has not been removed until now. Astrinko (talk) 19:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- oh... thats interesting... maybe it should be Keep then? modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 20:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- A logo that is only in the form of text does not meet the copyright threshold and enters the public domain, so the logo should not need to be removed. However, I am waiting for the Wikimedia Commons admin's decision whether the logo will be removed or not. Astrinko (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- oh... thats interesting... maybe it should be
- Look the logo File:Douyin wordmark.svg, that's the Chinese version of the TikTok application logo, even though the logo is in the form of text and the logo is cut from the original version, the logo is still on Wikimedia Commons and has not been removed until now. Astrinko (talk) 19:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- show me an example please. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Even though the logo I uploaded was a cut from the original version, as long as the file does not meet the copyright threshold, the file I uploaded entered the public domain. I don't think the Wikimedia Commons administrators removed the logo. There are still many Chinese company logos on Wikimedia Commons that are text only, but they have not been removed. Astrinko (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- if these kind of images you had mentioned is actually cropped version of original version, i would put these in DR too. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep China does have a very low ToO, but compared to the examples as to what has been ruled copyrightable there this does seem to be under their very low bar. Several files on enwiki are improperly marked nonfree when they could be on commons out of an abundance of caution. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Website given T&Cs state "You may use and re-use information free of charge from this website (not including the Royal Arms and departmental or Agency logos) under the terms of the Open Government Licence". Logos aren't under OGL, therefore the licence used is invalid. However, due to the simplicity of the logo, unsure if it meets the threshold of originality COM:TOO UK. DankJae 18:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Logo doesn't meet threshold of originality: simple text based logo, with simple font, Sadads (talk) 13:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Britain has a very low ToO for logos but there is no styling on this at all. It's just the font. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Sadads and Parakanyaa. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I believe this file violates Commons' file upload policy per South Korea's FoP laws. [11][12]. Please check and give input on this request. 00101984hjw (talk) 18:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I oppose the deletion of this photo for the following reasons:
- This photo depicts the statue of King Sejong the Great in Yeouido Park, unveiled on December 18, 1998. The statue, created by the artist Ok Dong-hwan and Ko Jeong-su and commissioned by the Seoul Metropolitan Government.[1]
- If the artists have contractually waived their copyright to the Seoul Metropolitan Government, then Article 35 of the Copyright Act, restricting commercial FOP, would not apply. Under these circumstances, Article 24-2 would permit free photographs of the statue to be taken and used for commercial purposes. This would allow this photo to be legally shared and used, supporting its retention on Wikipedia.
- Other photos of the statue in Yeouido Park are available on Gongu Madang (공유마당),[2][3] a platform operated and directly vetted by the Korea Copyright Commission (KCC). These photos have licensing which allows commercial use. The Gongu Madang platform employs a process to ensure that content is free of legal disputes and correctly licensed under Korean law.[4] The presence of this statue on Gongu Madang in pictures that allow for commercial use means it has passed this verification process, thus indicating that the KCC has confirmed the statue's copyright is available for public use as per Article 24-2. Nonabelian (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
References
- Delete, similar reasoning did not work and did not result to the undeletion of a deleted file imported from Flickr stream of the Korean Ministry of Culture. See Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2024-07#File:Statue of King Sejong (4273003660).jpg, which went stale. Note that the nominated image did not come from the aforementioned Korean agencies, but from a user of French Wikipedia. Furthermore, in the UNDEL request, from my reading of some of the sources presented by Nonabelian (translating the Korean language sources), it does appear that the agencies only permit free uses which are non-commercial. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete South Korea has no FoP. Being commissioned does not typically mean waiving copyright. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not public domain. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Café A Brasileira
[edit]this deletion request involves the following advertisements:
- File:O melhor café é o d'A Brasileira (Chiado, Lisboa).jpg
- File:Caf-A-Brasileira-3 (1).jpg
- File:O Velhote da Brasileira.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
my doubt is whether the source date is correct, because the name of the café only changed to include an "s" after 1945 following the Portuguese Language Orthographic Agreement of 1945. in the book Os Cafés de Lisboa, the author Marina Tavares Dias claims that the ad is actually from around 1961. or at least one of the ads!
the possible origin of this advertisement can only be from 1945 to 1961, which would not qualify for public domain in Portugal, sadly.
however, according to the same book, the character (called "velhote da chávena", lit. "old man with the cup") and the logo are way older, both from 1906 (the logo with Z is from 1906, the logo with S is from 1945).
Juwan (talk) 16:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- the tricky thing is trying to find these ads, but I don't know if I want to scour through several unrelated 20th-century newspapers for this, sorry. that's a challenge for someone else. Juwan (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 1905 is not realistic, "own work" is definitely not true, and the uploader who put 1915 has a slew of deleted images. It looks like the image is from 1961 and still under copyright. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 04:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I don't see how the CC license could be valid. While the file description gives the source of the data, that doesn't mean that the information in those sources becomes free to use.
The map is a close copy of that in Hayward's book, page vi (down to specific choices like the decision of which geographical features to include). Even though that map was modified with further information about the distribution of the individual languages from Ethnologue, Hayward's map itself remains copyrighted.
Speaking of Ethnologue, https://www.ethnologue.com/pricing/ is very clear that the distribution maps are only available to paying subscribers, and https://www.ethnologue.com/general-terms-use/ (specifically points 2 and 3) further states that all the information on their site is copyrighted. In particular, reproduction of any content is prohibited (this includes, but is not limited to, their maps), and using any content from the site for commercial purposes requires their written consent. There is no indication that different rules applied when the file was uploaded.
The copyright issue was first raised on the file talk page in 2009, about a year after the upload. The uploader/author did not reply to those concerns, even though they continued to work on the file until 2012 (and have remained active as an administrator on the German Wikipedia from 2008 until stepping down in 2016, and as a user on Commons until 2020). That is to say, I'm surprised they didn't respond to it.
The same applies to the two derivative versions, File:Omotic languages sv.svg and File:Omotic languages mk.svg (a third one in English that is linked from the file description has apparently been deleted in the meantime). Renerpho (talk) 05:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know if it's relevant, but this image has been featured on the main page of the German Wikipedia in 2022. Archive Renerpho (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Ethnologue has additional fair use guidelines,[13] but those state that Maps may be used in reports, presentations, displays, and other uses as long as they are not altered. (i.e., as long as the copyright watermark isn't removed), and graphic is not modified. [...] Any other use requires prior written permission from SIL International. They also limit the time for which fair use can be claimed for educational purposes: Educational multimedia projects created for educational purposes, and for teaching courses, may use SIL incorporated material for a period of up to two years after the first instructional use with a class. Use beyond that time period, even for educational purposes, requires permission for each copyrighted portion incorporated in the production. Renerpho (talk) 07:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment genuine question: can information alone be copyrighted? The only issue I see is if perhaps the visual representation of this data is too close to Ethnologue's... but how many accurate ways are there to show a place on a 2D simplified map? Without seeing the Hayward map I can't be sure how similar it is. Because if information could be copyrighted, would it then be a copyright violation to provide accurate data in any visualization method, if they're the source for the information? But if it comes to it being too close a copy visually of the original maybe that's different (but again, how different can you make it without straying into inaccuracy)? PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
