Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/06/13
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:PENIS and from user's other photos, he's a school boy thus this photo is underage. Mjrmtg (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Bad dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very poorly photographed image of common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 07:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Eliminar está imágen por favor incita a el odio Satanic Warmaster 666 (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you the Nazi Skinhead? 186.172.91.195 02:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I do not believe this file should be deleted as it states on in the source: "copyright free images available here". Therefore it is copyright free and possible to use. Mandatorylife (talk) 03:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
{{G7}} Bambinolini777 (talk) 23:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: G7 is only valid for unused files uploaded less than one week ago. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|F1}} Bambinolini777 (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong size Digitalpaper (talk) 08:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I have given up. MoJavaZ (talk) 10:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This photo has copyright!!!! MoJavaZ (talk) 10:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Map with mistake! Jakub Belaník (talk) 11:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Due to uploading a better quality file. 2Eressea2 (talk) 13:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Due to uploading a better quality file. 2Eressea2 (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
อยากลบรูปภาพนี้ เพราะมันไม่ถูกต้อง Pattananan (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Naked young boys 178.176.134.183 22:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep That's not a reason to delete. Jafeluv (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy keep Mass bad faith nomination by since-blocked anon IP - see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:178.176.146.22. Argument given confuses simple nudity with sexual content and per COM:SEX: "Except for images prominently featuring genitalia or sexual activity, mere partial or total nudity are generally not considered sexual content." Tabercil (talk) 02:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
The image depicts identifiable people. There is no proof about the consent from the boys in question. It therefore infringes their privacy. Walker99 (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - All Rights Reserved - Takabeg (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. The current Flickr licensing is not an issue, as the page confirms that the photo was properly licensed at the time of upload. The privacy issue is not a real problem: boys of that age, who are now 6 years older and presumably look rather different, in a third-world city of 327,000 people, are for practical purposes not identifiable. Sandstein (talk) 19:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Sandstein is right, though I think it's not important to stress the city to be "third-world" or not: The boys bath openly in a public place and seem proud of it, one of them even openly smiles at the photographer, apparently they're acting in public, and it's right that after 6 years the now no longer little boys are for practical purposes not identifiable... The licence is OK, and nudity by consent isn't a crime as such. Aidas (talk) 21:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- You can't argue that there is no privacy issue because it is from a "third world country" with "a lot of people". India or America, this is an infringement of privacy. Do only people from the so called first world have privacy rights? One cannot publish these nude images without consent. Walker99 (talk) 01:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- This tank is not a place where people openly take photographs or openly stare at those boys. Only a paedophile would do so. Therefore we cannot say an implicit consent is given. Even though the boys may look different now, they are identifiable. Especially for people who know them. Therefore you cannot argue that this picture is okay since it is 6 years old. Aidas says "nudity by consent isn't a crime as such.". The problem is that there is no apparent consent from all the boys involved in this photograph. They are not skinny dipping in order to display their nudity. They are doing it because they don't have wet clothes. Just because one boy appears to looks in the direction of the camera, you cannot argue that they are "proud" of the nudity, or that they have given the consent. In a tank like this, no one is expected to start at a naked boy. Therefore, photography is not accepted or expected there. Walker99 (talk) 01:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The picture has validity and is merely simple nakedness. Timtrent (talk) 23:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Moral crusading against child nudity. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 03:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, essentially agree with analysis by Sandstein (talk · contribs), above. It's basically Naturism. -- Cirt (talk) 05:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per Aidas. These kids are bathing in a public place, plus you can't really see anything. Mentioning paedophilia is in particular bad taste. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
2nd boy from right has an erection 116.240.159.164 08:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid and false rationale and even if it was true not a reason to delete. Also this IP lost time to see an low resolution image of 699 × 468 and make this kind of comments is "creepy and inappropriate comment", per Sandstein comment below. Tm (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
2nd boy from right appears to have an erection 116.240.159.164 10:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- That is (a) a creepy and inappropriate comment, and (b) not a reason for deletion even if true. Sandstein (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Ivnalid and false rationale and even if it was true not a reason to delete. Also this IP lost time to see an low resolution image of 699 × 468 and make this kind of comments is "creepy and inappropriate comment", per Sandstein comment ãbove. Tm (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the same keep arguments apply now, applied last time, and will apply in the future. Also the twin nominations should be combined please. Timtrent (talk) 13:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Persistent flickrwashing (I believe this image is under copyright). 2001:4452:11E:F200:6849:CCEC:B321:3698 14:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
KEPT. The file is reviewed so many times during last 18 years the file has been in Commons. This is vandalistic nomination and I must protect the file. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrong name Coolerbuds (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Deletion requested by the uploader shortly after upload, but file is still COM:INUSE at es:Gobernador regional de Chile. --Rosenzweig τ 18:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and correct his name as in the "caption". 186.172.189.10 20:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. --Bedivere (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
It’s under copyright law and i just copied the image from IMDb Hpesojierdna222 (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload, also apparently a copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry August Geyler (talk) 14:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Ankry. --Rosenzweig τ 08:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Created by a globally locked user (long-term abuse) Supertoff (talk) 16:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Aafi. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
User:Aka, ich bitte darum nur das Foto von meinem Gesicht zu löschen als "courtesy deletion". Es wird nirgends im Projekt verwendet. Das Foto von der randlosen Brille soll bleiben.
I ask that only the photo of my face be deleted as a courtesy deletion. It is not in use in the project. The photo of the rimless glasses should stay. Sciencia58 (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: the file as such; deleted the first version as requested by the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, it is a CIA map.
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it a separate file instead of as an update to https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ukraine_Defense_Contact_Group.svg SaltySalami12 (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Archivo mal escrito Polaris 778 (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Archivo mal escrito Polaris 778 (talk) 18:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
unfortunately uploaded image in .pdf. Already replaced by a jpg ofvthe same name with cc MenkinAlRire (talk) 19:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I made this and I want it down, please. Mvnceo (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Archivo mal escrito Polaris 778 (talk) 23:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded. Please delete. Thank you. Moonlily45 (talk) 00:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. --Yann (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Por favor eliminar está imágen Satanic Warmaster 666 (talk) 07:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) — doclys (❀) 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio by sockpuppeteer 186.172.91.195 02:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Je souhaite supprimer ce fichier (vide) pour en créer un nouveau complet (actuel et à jour) TravelDreamTeam (talk) 05:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep We don't delete old pictures just because they're outdated. Please upload new files with a new name. PaterMcFly (talk) 05:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Author @Marius Ciobanu Photography Copyright holder @Marius Ciobanu Photography. --Yann (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
J'ai mal choisi le droit d'auteur de l'image, je voudrais l'ajouter à nouveau avec les bons paramètres. Demba Welle (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW, no permission. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
{{G7}} Bambinolini777 (talk) 23:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: G7 is only valid for unused files uploaded less than one week ago. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|F1}} Bambinolini777 (talk) 05:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Igor Mitoraj died in 2014 A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Igor Mitoraj died in 2014 A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect Johan Otto von Spreckelsen died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Panayotis Vassilakis died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Panayotis Vassilakis died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect Johan Otto von Spreckelsen died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Vito Acconci died in 2017 A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Nogizaka46 2nd Album "Sorezore no Isu" Promotional Event "Nogiten" at Shibuya Tsutaya Commentary by Art Director (27183147922).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect Johan Otto von Spreckelsen died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LeoFreedom (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PENIS: unremarkable penis.
Mys_721tx (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Author is 林永康, living, not CC license shizhao (talk) 08:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Author is 龚建新, is living, not PD. see [1] shizhao (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 3D works in Japan. Günther Frager (talk) 11:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 3D works in Japan. Günther Frager (talk) 11:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 11:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 3D works in Japan. Günther Frager (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
A collage without an educational purpose, i.e. out of COM:SCOPE. Günther Frager (talk) 11:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
From the plaque one can infer it was created after his death in September 29, 1989. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Notice that there is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 11:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
The photo may be on the public domain, but the artwork it contain not as its creator, Marta Minujín, is still alive. Günther Frager (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
This image was taken by the duo en:W:Shunk-Kender and the copyright belongs to Roy Lichenstein Foundation. One can check this on the credit of the book Marta Minujín. Obras 1959 - 1989 (page 8 in the PDF). The photo appears in page 5 (7 in the PDF as it includes de cover). If the date on the description is accurate we can undelete it in 2059. Günther Frager (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Poster published in Argentina in 1986. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own work: found on FB. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
looks that this would be considered published artwork, and covered by copyright; more information required to show not under copyright — billinghurst sDrewth 23:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Only used for a hoax on enwiki. Air on White (talk) 00:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Most have FB MD, needs VRT to keep
- File:Shark Tank México.jpg
- File:NACAM F4 6.jpg
- File:NACAM F4 3.jpg
- File:NACAM F4 1.jpg
- File:NACAM F4 5.png
- File:NACAM F4 2.jpg
- File:El Primer Reloj Alebrije 1.jpg
- File:El Primer Reloj Alebrije.jpg
- File:El Primer Reloj Alebrije por Tonas Wood.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 08:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST - poor quality fan art uploaded for vanity gallery on es.wiki (INUSE requires legitimate use) and COM:DW copyvios of photographs (e.g., File:Melanie Martinez Painting.jpg is this; File:Nicki Minajs Painting.jpg is this; File:Bad Bunny Painting.jpg is this; etc.)
- File:Lady Gaga mother monster.jpg
- File:Jefree Star Painting.jpg
- File:Skull And paintings.jpg
- File:Mona Cat Painting.jpg
- File:Nicki Minajs Painting.jpg
- File:Ariana Grande Butera 1.jpg
- File:Melanie Martinez Painting.jpg
- File:Harley Queen, Marggot Robbie.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny Painting.jpg
- File:Alice Glass Painting.jpg
- File:Autorretrato 2.jpg
- File:Abstract numero uno.jpg
- File:Jarron de FLores Blancas.jpg
- File:Isis Alada.jpg
- File:King Lizard.jpg
- File:Anuel AA Painting.jpg
- File:Corona de Vida Eterna.jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus Paintings.jpg
- File:Cuerpo de Mujer.jpg
- File:Lana del Rey Painting.jpg
- File:Brandy Portrait.jpg
- File:Ariana Grande Dark Blue.jpg
- File:Audrey hepburn.jpg
- File:Marilyn monroe dripping.jpg
- File:THAT POPPY (102x79cm)óleo.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)
[edit]More of the same uploaded after above DR. File:Amy WInhouse Painting.jpg is this; File:Kali Uchis Painting.jpg is this; File:Ariana Grande Butera Dos.jpg is this; etc.
- File:Maria Daza Moom.jpg
- File:Absttract peiangin tres.jpg
- File:Ariana Grande Butera Dos.jpg
- File:Abstract Painting 2.jpg
- File:Amy WInhouse Painting.jpg
- File:Kali Uchis Painting.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 14:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: selfies.
- File:Selfie 7.jpg
- File:Selfie 6.jpg
- File:Selfie 5.jpg
- File:Selfie4.jpg
- File:Brandy Kein 2.jpg
- File:Firma brandy 1.svg
- File:Firmabrandy.svg
- File:BrandyKeinSelfie.jpg
- File:Brandy Kein Grey.jpg
- File:Brandy Kein.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 04:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not a COM:WEBHOST. Günther Frager (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: as previously, vanity content, including some derivative works.
- File:Collage Retratos y autorretratos de David Alejandro Daza,.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo. Retrato Edward.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo red flowers.jpg
- File:Pintura al del ex duo That poppy.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo del duo That Poppy.jpg
- File:Pintura al Óleo sobre lienzo Ariana Grande.jpg
- File:Dibujo Tecnica colores Flash Superheroe.jpg
- File:Dibujo a lapiz Cantante Avril Lavigne.jpg
- File:Dibujo Gato domestico al lapiz.jpg
- File:Pintura Buho Tecnica ecolines.jpg
- File:Pintura expresionista energia de chicas.jpg
- File:Retrato del canante Jefrre star. segundo angulo.png
- File:AUTORRETRATO ALEJANDRO DAZA (65x50cm)óleo.jpg
- File:Pintua abstracta numero uno angulo.jpg
- File:AUDREY HEPBURN 1(93x57cm)óleo.jpg
- File:Retrato de Barndy Kein 1.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo de la cantante fallecida may winehouse.jpg
- File:Pintura al Oleo Jarron con flores blancas.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo del che guevara.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo de la actriz audrey Hepburn angulo.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo Jarron con flores de colores.jpg
- File:Pintura abstracta numero 3.jpg
- File:Pintua al oleo del cantante jefrre star-.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo del cantante XXX TENTATION.jpg
- File:Pintura abstracta numero dos.jpg
- File:Pintura abstracta numero uno.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo de nicki minajs.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo de alice glass.jpg
- File:Pintura en Óleo del Cantante Bad Bunny.jpg
- File:Pintura al óleo de Marilyn Monroe.jpg
- File:Pintura de Lil Peep Óleo sobre Lienzo.jpg
- File:Pintura al oleo de Alice glass cantante.jpg
- File:Pintura Al Oleo de Audrey Hepburn.jpg
- File:Pintura al Óleo de Amy winehouse.jpg
- File:Pintura al Óleo de Bad Bunny.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - I've deleted the COM:DW images that are based on pre-existing celebrity photos - several/many/most of which which were also recreations of images deleted in DRs above. The remaining should be the the junk vanity non-notable art (although some like File:Pintura al oleo. Retrato Edward.jpg are likely also based on photographs I am just unable to find). Эlcobbola talk 20:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Эlcobbola talk 20:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Ok! Ragazzi! Ragazzi! Ragazzi !NON crederai a quello che ho trovato nel bosco l'altro giorno!..webp
[edit]Out of scope Lotje (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Vera (talk) 06:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Please refer to es:Ayuda:Tu primer artículo. Omphalographer (talk) 04:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not a COM:WEBHOST. Günther Frager (talk) 11:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Selfie without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Selfie without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Drakosh Next time please use a bulk DR for all files of a particular user Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Selfie without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Selfie without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Selfie without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
fantasy maps and election results
- File:Imperialmexicoelections.png
- File:Piechartconfederates.png
- File:Flag of milliokia.png
- File:Tecumseh election 1814.png
- File:Pakistanelection2021.png
- File:1924 election map usa.png
- File:Aaareferendumaaa.png
- File:2005parliament2005.png
- File:1951 house of representatives.png
Polarlys (talk) 18:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
useless fantasy or test files
- File:1919 Ottoman Election Parliament.png
- File:Ottomanparliament1915.png
- File:Franco-BritishElectionMap123.png
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't have any educational value. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 07:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I am the person in this photo and this is an old photo of me. I uploaded this photo and now I want to remove it. Mrcap512 (talk) 07:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 10:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
unused and useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PaavoSuomesta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
Geohakkeri (talk) 12:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo of Admin Kadi? I know you keep personal pictures of admins (it's not a fair world) but this is from Facebook. At least ask for a VRT permission. 186.172.88.84 12:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: It is not my photo :) F10, deleted. --Kadı Message 11:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by shop; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, self promotional image; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 16:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, film posters on temporary display. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.datatempo.co/foto/detail/P2803200300080/max-moein-dan-boediono Ariandi Lie (talk) 16:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Site reads No materials published by DATATEMPO.CO on this Site, in whole or in part, may be copied, reproduced, modified, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any form or by any means without prior written permission from DATATEMPO.CO --Achim55 (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside userpage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated (or 3D rendered?) image of two traffic cones. Tons of real photos of this object in Category:Traffic cones. Omphalographer (talk) 17:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
copyrighted DVD cover Trade (talk) 19:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I don't want to see it on Commons! 186.172.189.10 19:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Not own work: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt29745453/mediaviewer/rm2242790913/?ref_=tt_md_6 --Achim55 (talk) 10:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Useless rasterisation of a svg file. 80.215.178.224 20:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Shall I add F10 or is this enough? 186.172.189.10 20:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.172.189.10 20:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:User galleries?! 186.172.189.10 20:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Scope? Rights? 186.172.189.10 20:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrights 186.172.189.10 20:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright©©© 186.172.189.10 20:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
© copyvio 186.172.189.10 20:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright©©© 186.172.189.10 20:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
© TBN © ! 186.172.189.10 21:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this the famous Krdbot? 186.172.189.10 21:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
CopyrightTBN 186.172.189.10 21:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright copyvio 186.172.189.10 21:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot 186.172.189.10 21:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Lower quality version of File:Mekuo.png, inappropriate whitespace for a logo Nutshinou Talk! 17:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused, duplicate of File:Croatia- Banija-Kordun-Lika Operations, October 1991-January 1992.jpg Ђидо (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Logo is detailed enough to pass the threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LunaEclipse (talk • contribs) 20:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brainzones (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violations. Uploader cannot be Pep Daudé and Iwan Baan at the same time (see photographs' Exif).
- File:Completed Performance Art Center.jpg
- File:St. Nicholas Orthodox Church completed.jpg
- File:Sagrada Familia (2023).jpg
RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
2014 own work or 2024 own work? 186.172.91.195 02:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Image at [2] with clear copyright notice. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status? 186.172.91.195 02:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am the author/editor of this book.
- My name is Eli Rubenstein and I wrote the book in 1993 when I was Director of Young Leadership and National Director of March of the Living Canada working for United Israel Appeal of Canada, which has the copyright for the book published by Mosaic Press.
- The book is titled: FOR YOU WHO DIED I MUST LIVE ON ... REFLECTIONS ON THE MARCH OF THE LIVING: CONTEMPORARY JEWISH YOUTH CONFRONT THE HOLOCAUST - ISBN-0-88962-453–4
- See full publishing details below.
- I've already given my permission to have the book cover used at all times, and I have since then, again given permission to use this work under the Creative Commons open license Attribution-Share Alike for Wikipedia.
- Eli Rubenstein
- Director of Education
- International March of the Living
- FOR YOU WHO DIED I MUST LIVE ON ... REFLECTIONS ON THE MARCH OF THE LIVING: CONTEMPORARY JEWISH YOUTH CONFRONT THE HOLOCAUST
- Eli Rubenstein
- Oakville (Ont.), Mosaic Press, 1993. 126pp paper
- Copyright: United Israel Appeal of Canada
- ISBN 1-88962-453-4 (paper) $14.95 ISBN 0-88962-453-4 (cloth) $24.95. CIP
- Subject Headings:
- Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)-Influence.
- Holocaust Remembrance Day-Poland.
- Independence Day (Israel).
- ISBN-0-88962-453–4 Uiaeli (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 15:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status? 186.172.91.195 02:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Copyright status belongs to Second Story Press, the publisher of this book. The poster of the photo is the author and they have been granted permission to use the photo on Wikipedia by the publisher. 206.253.138.91 20:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Good news, now prove it. 186.172.189.10 21:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Tagged as missing permission. If free licensed by author/copyright holder, proof can be sent per COM:VRT. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 15:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status? 186.172.91.195 02:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am the author of the book where this photo appears. I received permission from the photographe, Stacey G. Wintre, when the photo was first shared with me to use this in my book and then for all other purposes including Wikipedia. Below is the message that was sent to Wikipedia in 2016 when the matter was first raised. Not sure why it's being raised again. Please see below. Thanks, Eli Rubenstein
- Begin forwarded message:
- From: Stacey G. <staceywintre@hotmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [Ticket#2016121410028393] Photo Permission
- Date: December 16, 2016 at 11:05:55 AM EST
- To: Simon Rakoff <computertherapist@rogers.com>
- Cc: "elir@bell.net" <elir@bell.net>
- I, Stacey G. Wintre, give permission to use this work that I have created - Girl with Flag on 1992 March of the Living. - under the Creative Commons open license Attribution-Share Alike.
- Sent from the Stacey G. iPhone 76.66.163.14 17:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply Uiaeli (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 15:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Who is Ronald Ross? 186.172.91.195 02:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Photo credited to third party. Needs COM:VRT confirmation or will be deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 15:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
No Freedom of panorama of 3D works in Finland メイド理世 (talk) 04:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
According to meta:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Northern Luri Wikipedia any text written in Northern Luri language by User:Mogoeilor is not be understandable to Northern Luri speakers and resulted in closure of Northern Luri Wikipedia. This page is written in Northern Luri language by User:Mogoeilor and presumably has the same issue. Jarekt (talk) 01:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Presumably the same for its logo: File:WikiLuri.png. Enhancing999 (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
"Unknown author", claimed source is a Facebook link.
Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Suwanda sitorus
[edit]Files uploaded by three different accounts (User:Ari julia sikander 41, User:Arabian Wiwoho, User:Cerminan) all crediting the images to Suwanda Sitorus with no evidence of permission. When flagged as lacking permission, a dynamic and non-English-speaking IP asked on one of those talk pages how to provide permission, was pointed at COM:VRT in their language, and is now just repeatedly blanking the permission templates and changing the licencing terms.
- File:Muhammad Daud Rotasi, Suwanda Sitorus, Amida Daud Rotasi, Wakil Ketua DPRD Prabumulih & Ketua Umum KONI Prabumulih.png
- File:Suwanda Sitorus S-2 Pascasarjana Universitas Bina Darma.jpg
- File:Suwanda Sitorus, Diana Wuisan, Empi Wuisan, Maehara Masahiro, Asian Games 2018 di Indonesia.jpg
- File:Suwanda Sitorus, Fan Zhendong, Asian Games 2018 di Indonesia.png
- File:Suwanda Sitorus, Sun Yingsha, Asian Games 2018 di Indonesia.jpg
- File:Suwanda Sitorus, Wang Manyu, Asian Games 2018 di Indonesia.jpg
- File:Suwanda Sitorus.png
Belbury (talk) 11:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Image source is a post on X. There is no CC license for this image. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A2%D8%B3%D9%88%D9%86%D9%B1 Enhancing999 (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo for non-wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 07:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Abdullah Rushdy has knowledge graph. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.172.189.10 21:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Je souhaite supprimer ce fichier (vide) pour en créer un nouveau complet (actuel et à jour) TravelDreamTeam (talk) 05:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Same here: Please upload new images with a new name. PaterMcFly (talk) 05:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
A hoax in the description. Such animal like "anacobra" (анакобра) doesn't exist. Andriy.v (talk) 06:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 08:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS メイド理世 (talk) 04:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 13:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO not by author, Found online: https://thawra.sy/?p=551858 Quick-ease2020 (talk) 08:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- As helpfully pointed out by user:Kitrsjlhf, The online article dates after date listed on image file(The article could have used it from commons). But I have found the same image from 2013 [3] and 2011 [4].
- The user has a history of copyvios. It is a low quality photo, and its missing EXIF data of the camera.
- I would say its extremely unlikely that the user took this photo.
- Thanks to user:Kitrsjlhf for letting me know that this request probably needs more explaining than a simple COPYVIO tag. Quick-ease2020 (talk) 20:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image is on different other web pages (instagram/facebook) before the upload on commons. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP in Spain does not apply here as the work is not permantently located in a public location (it's a poster) and it includes a photograph and a logo which are not known to be released under a Commons-compatible license. See the corresponding guideline. COM:de minimis does not apply either since the photograph-logo compound is the main subject in the picture. Nacaru (talk) 09:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.172.88.84 12:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This is likely not Ahola O.'s work. Further explanation is needed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EdoAug as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clear picture of label with copyrighted / non-de minimis illustration? Yann (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PACKAGING. --Wdwd (talk) 15:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be "Own work", unless uploader is author of letter. (See also: File:Excuses_NIK_aan_Markuszower_Pagina_2.jpg) Coretteket (talk) 10:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be "Own work", unless uploader is author of letter. (See also: File:NIK aan Gidi Markuszower.png) Coretteket (talk) 10:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://tineye.com/search/e669786155c3030a0a1ff41eb2a2daccf7e75940?sort=score&order=desc&page=1. Source visitrwanda is right, but no indication it is PD-US or anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lupe (talk • contribs) 09:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be "Own work", unless uploader is author of letter. (See also: File:NIK excuses aan Gidi Markuszower pagina 2.jpg) Coretteket (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be "Own work", unless uploader is author of letter. (See also: File:NIK excuses aan Gidi Markuszower pagina 1.jpg) Coretteket (talk) 12:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Menteri Negara Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Kwik Kian Gie (kiri) dan Ketua Komisi IX DPR Max Moein (kanan).png
[edit]Copyright violation https://www.datatempo.co/foto/detail/P1306200300034/kwik-kian-gie-dan-max-moein Ariandi Lie (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Gubernur Bank Indonesia Burhanuddin Abdullah (kanan) bersalaman dengan Ketua Komisi IX DPR Max Moein MBA (kiri) seusai rapat kerja di Gedung DPR.png
[edit]Copyright violation https://www.datatempo.co/foto/detail/P0906200400012/burhanuddin-abdullah-dan-max-moein Ariandi Lie (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Direktur Utama PT Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI) Sigit Pramono (kiri) dan Ketua Komisi IX DPR Max Moein (kanan).png
[edit]Copyright violation https://www.datatempo.co/foto/detail/P1509200400058/sigit-pramono-dan-max-moein Ariandi Lie (talk) 16:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Direktur Utama (Dirut) PT Pertamina Widya Purnama (tengah), Ketua Komisi XI DPR RI Awal Kusumah (kiri), dan Wakil Ketua Komisi XI DPR RI Max Moein (kanan).png
[edit]Copyright violition https://www.datatempo.co/foto/detail/P0711200600139/widya-purnama-awal-kusumah-dan-max-moein Ariandi Lie (talk) 16:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Menteri Negara Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Paskah Suzetta (kanan) dan Wakil Ketua Komisi XI DPR Max Moein (kiri).png
[edit]Copyright violation https://www.datatempo.co/foto/detail/P1701200700069/paskah-suzetta-dan-max-moein Ariandi Lie (talk) 16:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Direktur Utama PT Telkom Arwin Rasyid (kiri) bersama Wakil Ketua Komisi XI DPR Max Moein (kanan).png
[edit]Copyright violation https://www.datatempo.co/foto/detail/P2704200700086/arwin-rasyid-dan-max-moein Ariandi Lie (talk) 16:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Not useful redirection 69.171.148.37 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G2. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
The buildings architect was Rolf Prange who died in 2006, and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years and there is no FoP in Germany for interior views.
- File:Bar der Kammerspiele.JPG
- File:Darmstadt Staatstheater Foyer.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Staatstheater Zuschauerraum vom Rang.jpg
- File:Staatstheater Darmstadt - Foyer Kleines Haus.jpg
- File:Staatstheater Darmstadt - Großer Saal (2).jpg
- File:Staatstheater Darmstadt - Großer Saal.jpg
- File:Staatstheater Darmstadt Treppenaufgang.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gasteig stairs
[edit]There is no FoP for interior views in Germany. The buildings architects was a team around Eike Rollenhagen who is still alive and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years.
- File:Gasteig Glashalle 1.jpg
- File:Gasteig Glashalle 2.jpg
- File:Gasteig Glashalle 21.jpg
- File:Gasteig Glashalle 7.jpg
- File:Gasteig Glashalle.jpg
- File:Gasteig Treppen.jpg
- File:Gasteig Treppenabgang gesehen vom 2 OG.jpg
- File:Gasteig Treppenhaus.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Copy vio from this https://vm.ru/moscow/864335-proklyatie-bryusa-kakie-tajny-skryvayut-chasy-na-fasade-doma-musina-pushkina site Kotofey2016 (talk) 17:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Грузовой порт на территории Стрелки в Нижнем Новгороде, 1970—1980 годы. Фото - pastvu.jpg
[edit]Copy vio from this https://pastvu.com/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW, missing info (source,author, date) for the original work. --Wdwd (talk) 13:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- This file is attributed to the wrong author
- This file is no longer being used in any wiki pages
- This logo is obsolete and uses the wrong typeface for the word mark (even for an old version)
Linh Padlet (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This photograph was uploaded with a CC license tag, but there is no indication on the web site given as a source that there is a valid CC license. The author, German photographer Adolf Lazi, died in 1955, so the photo is still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2025, and as the photo is from 1950, it is still protected by copyright in the USA until the end of 2045. The file should therefore be deleted; it can be restored in 2046. Rosenzweig τ 09:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023041710005851 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 17:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
there is a same one in higher resolution: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Heinrich_Steiner_am_Klavier.jpg Berlinschneid (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: not the same file (cropped version, kept booth). --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Je me suis rendu compte qu'il manque au moins 10 pages au scan. Le pire c'est qu'elles ne sont même pas contiguës ! Merci de supprimer ce fichier, j'importerai un scan complet à la place. Epigeneticist (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 06:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: a large, indiscriminate collection of uploaded street photographs which are unlikely to be usable in educational content.
Renominating a subset of files from the first nomination with results from additional research and more detailed descriptions. So far, this user has uploaded nearly three thousand photos with no meaningful descriptions or categories, apparently directly from their camera roll; this nomination covers the first 77 of them (ordered by the timestamps in the file names) as a sample.
This user's photos are mostly of commercial buildings and their surroundings in the Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario suburbs of Los Angeles, California. They're all taken at night, with a handheld cell phone camera, so image quality is poor. Some of the photos were taken through the windows of unoccupied commercial buildings at night, and border upon trespassing.
As an aid in reviewing these images, I've created a gallery of this user's uploads at User:Omphalographer/Sony 19th. The files in this nomination are in the same order as they're shown on that page, and are divided up in roughly the same way.
- The first fourteen files are photos of some common areas of a generic office building. The photos appear to have been taken through a window; some of the photos are completely obscured by reflections off the glass. The building is probably the w:Universal Technical Institute at 9494 Haven Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA (34°04′58″N 117°34′36″W / 34.08281°N 117.57674°W). While this is a notable chain of technical colleges, these photos would be of absolutely no use in illustrating it, as nothing specific to the college is visible.
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223509955.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223515370.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223525666 MP.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223530293.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223533978.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223537857 MP.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223539710.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223546781.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223551299.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223556695.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223831197.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223835605.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223839833.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 223844475.jpg
- The next five photos were taken from a walkway just outside the north entrance to the UTI building, around 34°05′03″N 117°34′35″W / 34.08427°N 117.57629°W. A couple outdoor benches are visible, along with a gas station in the distance.
- The next five photos were taken near the freight loading dock at UTI.
- The next eight photos are of the interior of an empty car parking structure, almost certainly the one surrounding the office buildings in the next section. One or two of these photos might be marginally usable as illustrations of parking lots, but the image quality isn't great, and these structures are hardly difficult to find and photograph.
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225012695 MP.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225017009.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225020456.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225024142.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225028679.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225110555.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225113735.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225116884.jpg
- Immediately following that, there are thirteen photos of the exterior of a pair of low-rise office buildings, and their surrounding parking lot, at 9680 and 9692 Haven Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA (34°04′43″N 117°34′36″W / 34.07861°N 117.57671°W). As usual, there's very little of substance here. There's nothing visible inside the building, and its exterior is unremarkable.
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225231179.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225233660.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225236531 MP.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225238897.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225314220.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225316532.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225319931.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225323113.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225326023.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225330857.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225334175.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225347774.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 225353830.jpg
- Next up, we have the storefront of a Mathis Brothers home furnishings store at 4105 Inland Empire Blvd, Ontario, CA (34°04′12″N 117°33′51″W / 34.06989°N 117.56418°W). Most of these photos are focused more on the parking lot than the building; they would be of little value in illustrating content about the company.
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 230852101.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 230855083.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 230858754.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 230902743.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 230924581.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 230928794.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231004393 MP.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231007340.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231009813 MP.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231011989.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231015646.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231020285.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231024063.jpg
- Finally, across the street, a set of photos of the parking lot outside a CarMax car dealership at 4100 Inland Empire Blvd. We admittedly don't have a ton of photos of CarMax locations (Category:CarMax), but these photos (like all the photos in this nomination) were taken at night and are much lower quality than existing photos.
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231024063.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231209518.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231212719.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231216320.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231220662.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231223488.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231225843.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231227813.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231230051.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231337778.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231341465.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231345359.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231355561.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231359642.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231435007-PANO.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231435007.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231438933.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231442630.jpg
- File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 231445975.jpg
There are still over a hundred photos left from this night alone, but I'm going to leave it here for now. Omphalographer (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, out of scope. Commons is not a dumping ground for large amounts of irrelevant material, and it should be removed to avoid wasting resources on it. Archives call this very common process "cassation" (w:de:Kassation (Archiv)) TheImaCow (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Not used and better version at File:Boom logo.svg Boom AM (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, hence opening a regular deletion request. Rain Forest (talk) 06:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- You should have noted that information, so others would be aware. Typically, such details are listed under the video, not in the comment section. It's understandable that anyone, including myself, would have mistaken it for a copyright violation. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 07:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: failed COM:LR: no CC license and no comment to that effect (likely comment has since been deleted). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SWinxy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work by Ksoglin; no license: https://vimeo.com/143569457 at 3:30 Yann (talk) 08:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- keep, the original uploader, "Ksoglin", appears to be the same person as Citizen Kate. https://www.linkedin.com/in/kate-soglin-24a57611/. Kingofthedead (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I concur. I believe this is the same person. SWinxy (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. A photo of the painting cannot be published without prior consent by the artist. Till (talk) 08:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
What is this photo about? What would be a good description? The current description is not French and Google Translate does not translate it into proper English. JopkeB (talk) 10:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is this a personal photo? Otherwise: How can this photo be reused? For what kind of educational purpose? JopkeB (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. And likely not own work based on filename. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of CC licence at source (https://shanklinrifleandpistolclub.org.uk/fullbore-rifle/): uploader has not asserted any connection with Shanklin RPC, who (presumably) hold the copyright. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 11:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Image source is here There is no Creative Commons license for this image. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. See for instance https://arquidiocesedebelem.com.br/arcebispo/ Py4nf (talk) 12:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
a collage of sorts, with people drawn in? I doubt the elements used are all free. -- Deadstar (msg) 13:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) DOROTHEAHENSEN M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Album cover under copyright Goldorak (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete due both to being fake *and* to being a probable copyvio (as per PCP):-
Fake mockup of nonexistent model "Nikon D4X" (upload predating the release of the original Nikon D4 by some time). This appears to be a barely-modified photo of the Nikon D3X with an obviously-fake LCD and the name badge changed but nothing else.
Seems to be based on this photo of a Nikon D3X with only minor contrast and adjustment tweaks. Not clear if *that* is uploader's own work originally, but unlikely as no sign of it on Commons and uploader previously had another upload removed as a copyvio around the same time.
(Note: User appears to have changed their name from "Wilder Kaiser" to "Bernie Kohl" at some point following the upload).
Ubcule (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note; appears to have been put back in use at Urdu Wikipedia after my edit was rejected by Tahir mq (talk · contribs) (mentioned here in case they wish to contribute to this discussion).
- Regardless of whether it remains in-use, *if* it's a copyvio, it should still be deleted from Commons. Ubcule (talk) 10:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
This file will not be used in a wikipedia content. Gnahem (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Who is Nicolas Giuseppone? Is he somehow notable? PaterMcFly (talk) 07:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 02:29, July 13, 2024, by Krd (No ticket permission since 12 June 2024). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright? Source "Friend" is not very clear. See here. it is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
wrong photo Nmasan (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Not used and better version at File:Boom 104.1 logo.svg Boom AM (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Not used and better version at File:Boom 106.5 logo.svg Boom AM (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside spammy sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Original size version: File:Tea Kattle art in Taitung Kaneshiro Takeshi Tree 20141112.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 10:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- You should use {{Merge}} instead of {{Delete}} for such cases. You may also consider reporting this: Commons:History merging and splitting.--125.230.65.217 09:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate, now redirect. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Half black 186.172.88.84 12:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A2%D8%B3%D9%88%D9%86%D9%B1 Enhancing999 (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wiggleguy579579 (talk · contribs)
[edit]no data source, could be just made up; note that 2 of these are in use but it's likely they will be removed soon given they lack a datasource and the refs near it are a directly embedded image
- File:Total Fertility rate in selected countries (1950-2023).jpg
- File:Total Fertility rate in India by religion (1947-2023).jpg
- File:Total fertility rate in selected countries.jpg
Prototyperspective (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
the Dune popcorn bucket is a copyrighted sculpture. This image focuses on it directly, so it's not de minimis. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I think that there's a pretty good argument to be made for it to be de minimis. The bucket only takes up a small part of the image, and it's being held by a person so it's being presented in the context of being a useful object, IE being used as a bucket. I think that this photo would fall under case 5 on the COM:DM page: Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the subject, and is essential to the subject (e.g. removing it would make the file useless) but the work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity, so de minimis may apply. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; based on the title and description, it's pretty clear the focus is the bucket, not the person holding it. If the person holding it is/should be the main focus, this should be cropped and renamed. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: clear focus of work by title and description; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Logo likely to be above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No free license seen where it was posted: https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/cwl4ft/a_synthesis_of_various_secular_iran_flag_designs/ HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a work by Mehr News Agency, photograph taken from @SaadoonMustafa on Twitter (per thenationalnews.com) HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Wrong license for Ukrainian army subunit established in 2023 (has to be clarified if this is in PD under any other conditions/license) Tatewaki (talk) 18:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Image found somewhere else on Google; amateur photographer taking the picture in the Mazhilis building itself is unlikely; free image is available anyway Malik Nursultan B (talk) 23:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: from Instagram; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
It is useful that there is an article about this video and already 21 exist but I do not see a benefit from existence of the video itself.The Policy says "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject" ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Historical video. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It is COM:INUSE on articles on projects. No valid reason to delete, since it is then automaticly in COM:SCOPE. (t) Josve05a (c) 13:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Josve05a --Magnus (talk) 13:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Speedily so. In use and of historical significance. Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- For reference, there are no speedy keeps. (Except in cases of vandalism, of course.) Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I fail to understand the logic of the nomination, it seems too obvious to me to have to argue that we would want to keep the unique video, as well as creating articles about it. --Fæ (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion --MB-one (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per above, VIGNERON (talk) 12:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
The YouTube account this video was uploaded from is not operated by the videographer. Do we have any evidence that they were actually able to release this under a Creative Commons license? Launchballer (talk) 10:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete As long as the videographer hasn't released this video under a suitable license, this will have to go. Yann, I'm not sure that this deletion request is showing up in the right places. Could you take a look and apply a fix if needed? Schwede66 05:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Shouldn't we ask the videographer before nominating? AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 21:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ask the videographer about the license
- AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 21:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- "This file, which was originally posted to Youtube, was reviewed on 6 June 2013 by reviewer Armbrust, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date." Trade (talk) 23:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging User:Armbrust for comment, Rjjiii (talk) 03:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Why did nobody by now simply look at the Wayback Machine archived version of the video? Here is the page as of 6 June 2013. It has this in the description:
This video is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
Category Film & Animation
License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)- Prototyperspective (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging User:Armbrust for comment, Rjjiii (talk) 03:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
[[Category:]]
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Prototyperspective. --Yann (talk) 18:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Since this video depicting Jawed Karim was taken by Yakov Lapitsky, there are two possibilities here: (1) Karim is a joint author and thus could release the video under a CC license, or (2) Karim is not a joint author, leaving the video's copyright solely in Lapitsky's hands because Lapitsky is the one who "fixed" the work. Given that we are bound by the precautionary principle, we should assume the latter and delete the video unless someone is able to obtain permission from Lapitsky. prospectprospekt (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also includes File:Me at the zoo (screenshot).png as derivative work of the video. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 05:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Changing my !vote to neutral after reading Meta:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership. It is possible that Karim is, beyond a significant doubt, a joint author. Here it says that Karim gave Lapitsky his camera and then asked Lapitsky to film him, suggesting that Karim had creative control over the video. Also, I want to disclose that I tried to contact Lapitsky several months ago. prospectprospekt (talk) 18:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Waymond's about to kick some serious ass - Everything Everywhere All At Once - Prime Video.webm
[edit]Copyright violation speedy deletion request from Di with justification: Prime Video is not the copyright holder for this film, and thus cannot release scenes of it under a usable license. Dhx1 (talk) 02:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Original speedy deletion request from @Di (they-them): https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Waymond%27s_about_to_kick_some_serious_ass_-_Everything_Everywhere_All_At_Once_-_Prime_Video.webm&oldid=883523668
- Evidence of section 6 of https://videodirect.amazon.com/home/agreement points to Amazon generally having agreements in place with film copyright owners for Amazon's use of "Promotional Materials" in any media (e.g. YouTube included). In the case of this deletion request for a clip from "Everything Everywhere All At Once", the copyright owner appears to remain as A24 Films per search of the copyright owner on copyright.gov. Per https://press.aboutamazon.com/2013/11/amazon-and-a24-announce-exclusive-content-agreement-making-prime-instant-video-the-only-premium-subscription-service-to-offer-films-from-a24 there is likely a non-standard/custom exclusive distribution agreement between A24 Films and Amazon, that appears more likely than not would allow Amazon to distribute promotional material via YouTube, seemingly with the Creative Commons license that Amazon has a pattern of using on YouTube.
- In either outcome of this deletion request, Wikimedia Commons copyright help pages need adjusting to make clear when copyright owners or distributors should and should not be trusted in their use of Creative Commons licenses. When should copyright owners and distributors be second guessed? Is it necessary for Wikimedia Commons to obtain permissions from all musicians and script writers that have contributed copyrighted content to a film company to rule out the possibility of a film company incorrectly releasing a film as CC-BY without permission of all other copyright owners related to the film? Or should a film company be trusted/assumed to have obtained all these permissions correctly being using the CC-BY license? Dhx1 (talk) 03:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- DeleteAmazon wants people to spread the word, and promotional materials are expected to be used as part of an article about the video. All the best -- Chuck Talk 03:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I'm not entirely sure why "Amazon wants people to spread promotional material" is a reason for deletion. This discussion ultimately comes down to whether or not Amazon has the rights to release the footage under Creative Commons, not whether they "want" the scene to be spread. Di (they-them) (talk) 03:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- DeleteAmazon wants people to spread the word, and promotional materials are expected to be used as part of an article about the video. All the best -- Chuck Talk 03:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- While Amazon certainly has the right to show the film and to promote it, such licenses rarely if ever allow the distributor to freely license the work to others. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, then I guess all other pictures featuring the St George Monument (Freedom Monument) in the category Freedom Square, Tbilisi should be listed for deletion, too. --Botev (talk) 07:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Anime Expo 2013
[edit]per COM:TOYS
- File:Anime Expo 2013 - Gundam F91 (9225643695).jpg
- File:Anime Expo 2013 - Gundam model (9225643241).jpg
- File:Anime Expo 2013 - Gundam RX-78 (9225643879).jpg
- File:Anime Expo 2013 - Gundam RX-78 -Picture 2- (9225643541).jpg
メイド理世 (talk) 04:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Hat Oskar Hillebrandt dieses Werk selbst entworfen oder nur selbst abfotografiert? GerritR (talk) 13:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason given and file has a permission tag. If you have questions about the permission, please use the VRT noticeboard. --Wdwd (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
VRT ticket provides permission for photo only, but not for depicted work Krd 05:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Was mich interessieren würde: War der ursprüngliche, von mir gestellte Löschantrag mit gleicher Stoßrichtung und Argumentation nicht verständlich genug? Reagieren die Admins auf unenglisch gestellte Löschanträge nur widerwillig?--GerritR (talk) 06:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Geht so. Bevorzugt wird schon englisch, aber es gibt genügend Commons-Admins, die deutsch verstehen. Ich nehme an, der @Wdwdbot hat den letzten Antrag geschlossen, weil er dachte, das VRT-Ticket beträfe sowohl Fotografie als auch das Werk. Die Fotografie ist wohl unproblematisch und korrekt lizenziert, beim Werk bin ich nicht sicher. Könnte alt genug sein oder unter sowas wie {{PD-Coa-Germany}} fallen. PaterMcFly (talk) 05:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Info, @GerritR: nicht verständlich sondern ungeeignet. Zur Erklärung: Ein Löschantrag dient dazu, dass Du als Antragsteller möglichst konkrete Punkte vor bringst, welche eine Löschung begründen und untermauern. Eine Frage in Rahmen eines Löschantrages in den Raum zu stellen, wie oben von Dir, ist dafür im Allgemeinen ungeeignet. Im speziellen auch, weil die Antwort darauf hier gar nicht geklärt werden kann, da diese Datei ein Freigabe via VRT hat - möglicherweise hast Du diesen Umstand übersehen. Da nun nicht alle Admins VRT-Zugriff haben und die nicht-öffentlichen Tickets für die Freigabe nicht einsehen/kontrollieren können, erfolgte daher mein Verweis diese Frage im VRT-Board zu stellen. Mit der Sprache hat dieser Ablauf und auch meine Aktion nichts zu tun.--Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Die VRT-Freigabe habe ich sehr wohl gesehen und auch gleich den Verdacht gehabt, dass sie fehl geht. Ich dachte, dass die Freigabe dann auch in der LD (mit) hinterfragt wird, anstatt den Ball erstmal wegzuspielen. GerritR (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Info, @GerritR: nicht verständlich sondern ungeeignet. Zur Erklärung: Ein Löschantrag dient dazu, dass Du als Antragsteller möglichst konkrete Punkte vor bringst, welche eine Löschung begründen und untermauern. Eine Frage in Rahmen eines Löschantrages in den Raum zu stellen, wie oben von Dir, ist dafür im Allgemeinen ungeeignet. Im speziellen auch, weil die Antwort darauf hier gar nicht geklärt werden kann, da diese Datei ein Freigabe via VRT hat - möglicherweise hast Du diesen Umstand übersehen. Da nun nicht alle Admins VRT-Zugriff haben und die nicht-öffentlichen Tickets für die Freigabe nicht einsehen/kontrollieren können, erfolgte daher mein Verweis diese Frage im VRT-Board zu stellen. Mit der Sprache hat dieser Ablauf und auch meine Aktion nichts zu tun.--Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- GerritR, Du kannst nicht davon ausgehen dass hier Löschanträge nur von vernünftigen Leuten gestellt werden und dass demzufolge immer alle Details betrachtet werden. Das geht zeitlich auch gar nicht. In sofern war die Reaktion auf den eigentlich richtigen Löschantrag genau die, die eingetreten ist. Hier hat niemand etwas falsch gemacht. --Krd 14:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
{{FoP-China}} doesn't cover text. 沈澄心✉ 12:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS メイド理世 (talk) 13:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Photo by Rubén Andón [5] taken in 1976 in Argentina. The source is the Facebook from photographer, and there is no information about its first publication. Thus, it is not clear it is in the Argentine public domain (20 years after publication). Notice that if it was published between 1976 and 1989, its US copyright was restored due to URAA. Later publications are covered by Berne Convention. Also, it is important to notice that in the source the image has a watermark with the copyright symbol and the name of the photographer. Günther Frager (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
copyvio; contemp. artworks; no fop.
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 01.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 05.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 06.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 07.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 08.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 09.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 10.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 11.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 36.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:34, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ich hab an der Kasse gefragt ob ich Fotos machen darf. Ich sollte nur kein Blitzlicht nehmen. --sk (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Da warst Du nicht optimal beraten. Es braucht hier eine gültige Freigabe, da nur gemeinfreie Werke möglich sind. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Gut, dann löschen. --sk (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Da warst Du nicht optimal beraten. Es braucht hier eine gültige Freigabe, da nur gemeinfreie Werke möglich sind. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; contemp. artwork; no fop.
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 28.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 29.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 37.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 38.jpg
- File:Light rays and stairs.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Hufnagel Pütz and Rafaelian were the architects of the building and all three are still alive, in Germany there is no Freedom of Panorama for interior views and Germany has also a standard of life + 70 years
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 04.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 46.jpg
- File:2019-08-09 Leipzig Museum der bildenden Künste 81.jpg
- File:Leipzig MdbK ŝtuparo.jpg
- File:Museum-der-bildenden-Kuenste-Leipzig-Bildermuseum-innen-11-2016.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have no problem with the deleting of my images. So we must wait or the museum give us free images. --sk (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Mehr News Agency has stated on the gallery page that the photographs have been taken from foreign sources ("منابع خارجی"), hence these are not created by their staff. The credit of images on this gallery is either blank or 'Received'. One instance known to have been taken from social media: Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019 attack on the United States embassy in Iraq 04.jpg.
- File:2019 attack on the United States embassy in Iraq 02.jpg
- File:2019 attack on the United States embassy in Iraq 03.jpg
- File:2019 attack on the United States embassy in Iraq.jpg
- File:Attack on the United States embassy in Baghdad 15.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
There is no FoP for interior views in Poland. The building was newly built by Bohdan Pniewski who died in 1965. Poland has a standard of life + 70 years
- File:26649145851 - Flickr - Magdalena Roeseler.jpg
- File:Grand Theatre, Warsaw interior July 7th 2010.jpg
- File:Teatr Wielki w Warszawie Foyer dolne.jpg
- File:Teatr Wielki w Warszawie Foyer.jpg
- File:Teatr Wielki w Warszawie hol główny.jpg
- File:Teatr Wielki w Warszawie Sala Moniuszki 2016.jpg
- File:Warsaw Grand Theatre 1.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Incorrect. Both main building and historic interiors are post-war reconstructions, i.e. they were not designed from scratch by the team of architects led by Bohdan Pniewski. Also, the southern wing was rebulit earlier, in late 1940s. Therefore, those interiors are not protected by Polish copyright law. Boston9 (talk) 11:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure? I am happy to believe you but can you also bring a source that confirms what you write? Here the history pf the theatre. In Wold War 2 it says it was destroyed completely with only the facade standing at the end of the war. Following the war it was renovated for 20 years to plans from Pniewski and it was inaugurated in 1965. The theatre company played on other stages during the renovation.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- As noted the official web site of the theater speaks of new designs. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation https://www.arkfinance.ie/our-charity-for-2021/ Xocolatl (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ciao @Xocolatl, sono due foto differenti. -- Anubi1984 (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ruthven per nomination, closed by Jameslwoodward. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
The buildings architect was Bernhard Hermkes who died in 1995 and in Germany there is no Freedom of Panorama for interior views and Germany has also a standard of life + 70 years
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Auditorium I (1).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Auditorium I (2).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Auditorium I (3).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Auditorium I (4).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Auditorium I (5).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Foyer (1).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Foyer (2).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Foyer (3).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Foyer (4).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Foyer (5).JPG
- File:Audimax der Universität Hamburg, Foyer (6).JPG
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I took these pictures with the permission of the Universität Hamburg, owner of this building. They are meant as an illustration of de:Auditorium Maximum (Universität Hamburg), an article I researched, wrote and submitted for the Schreibwettbewerb, the premier high quality writing contest of the German language Wikipedia. One of the jurors suggested pictures of the interior, and I complied. The article won the second prize that year. I then submitted the article to Exzellenz vote (FA), which the article passed. The question of Urheberrecht was discussed, and one of the jurors (Brodkey65) commented in the negative on these interior shots, meaning their framing and detail did not pass the originality test and they were thus permissible.
- Now I realize that none of this matters in the slightest, not my research efforts, not my various visits to research libraries and one archive, nor discussions and reviews, nor photo shoots. Because hey: Let's nominate these pictures for deletion, because the estate of Bernhard Hermkes cares deeply about his work not getting any visibility. It took user Paradise Chronicle about 2 minutes to make these deletion requests. For shame. --Minderbinder (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Minderbinder, this is indeed a petty, all your efforts were and are admirable. I have had a similar discussion before, and then I suggested that the images just be uploaded directly to the German wikipedia. I am pretty sure that in your case this will be possible as well. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Clearly COPYVIO and we don't keep copyrighted material simply because the uploader consulted other people or put work into getting the images. Although I'd suggest following Paradise Chronicle's advice and just uploading them to German Wikipedia. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- we can do without Minderbinder's attitude. Admins often have to do things that we would rather not, but Commons does not keep copyright viloations. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
While there is licence text at the source (archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20161119090641/http://avproduction.am/ with the license text in Armenian beneath the copyright stamenent in the footer), it explicitly disallows derivative works. Own work claim contradicted by author statement in the description and really not believable. Felix QW (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
The Armenian copyright term is pma +70; there is no reason this image should have been made before 1954, when the subject would have been 46 years old. Felix QW (talk) 21:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
The architect Fritz Hetzelt died in 1986, in Germany exists a standard of life + 70 years and there exists no FoP for interior views in Germany
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 17 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 19 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 20 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 31 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 32 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 33 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 35 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 36 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 37 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 38 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 39 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 45 ies.jpg
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 46 ies.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. No substantively creative architectural elements. Mostly simple walls, stairs, bleachers, and swimming pools. These are only de minimis portions of a larger architectural work which do not pass the threshold of originality on their own. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you serious? The views are spectacular, it's a tremendous architect who can enable such views. Your keep votes sometimes really surprise me. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm completely serious. I could see a case maybe for File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 37 ies.jpg being deleted, as the grand windows might be a substantive enough portion of the architectural work. Your nominations are sometimes valid, but they contain no discernment. Just because a photograph is taken indoors does not mean that the photograph contains an architectural detail which is creative enough on its own for protection. It would be like taking a single Picasso brushstroke or a single word from Tolkien and saying those things are protected. It doesn't make any sense. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 17 ies.jpg: very good architect work! --Atamari (talk) 09:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to assume you are being sarcastic about this simple red-tiled shower. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 17 ies.jpg: very good architect work! --Atamari (talk) 09:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm completely serious. I could see a case maybe for File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 37 ies.jpg being deleted, as the grand windows might be a substantive enough portion of the architectural work. Your nominations are sometimes valid, but they contain no discernment. Just because a photograph is taken indoors does not mean that the photograph contains an architectural detail which is creative enough on its own for protection. It would be like taking a single Picasso brushstroke or a single word from Tolkien and saying those things are protected. It doesn't make any sense. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you serious? The views are spectacular, it's a tremendous architect who can enable such views. Your keep votes sometimes really surprise me. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Absolutely crazy idea! If this request for deletion is approved, interior photos of public buildings may no longer be published from now on, as even in very old buildings the interior is almost always younger than 100 years and therefore the interior designer has not been dead for 70 years.How can you get the idea that every piece of interior design is a work of art? Oh yeah, the red of the tiles is just amazing, my dear.
- Addendum: Only tiled in a round shape it is a work of art, of course not at a 90 degree angle, look here! And here, a unique stroke of genius. Who other than Hetzelt would have ever thought of designing stands in the form of steps? Im Fokus (talk) 20:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Just as a sentence or two from a thousand page book has a copyright, so architectural details have an enforceable copyright which we must obey. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
This is serie of promotional photos in 2013 of "Samuel Celestino" - see, v. g., look at the identical clothes (the tie, in particular) and the white background in http://brunoalvesking.blogspot.com/2013/05/samuel-celestino-tarde-ampla-geral-e.html and please also note that this image does not contain the EXIF data of the photograph André Koehne TALK TO ME 22:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1949 British poster. Possibly public domain in the UK (I cannot find an artist credit), but this was not public domain in the UK in 1996 so this was restored by URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 22:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
{{Vk}} This feature film is only copyrighted in the US per COM:URAA, except for that poster. Because, it was first published outside the US (and not published in the US within 30 days). Unsyndicated Truth (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)- The film (which is one of my personal favorites) is still under copyright in the United Kingdom because the principal creators have not been dead for 70 years. But this is just discussing the poster, which as you say was not simultanously published in the US, and had its US copyright restored by URAA on January 1, 1996. Abzeronow (talk) 22:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Maybe I should keep this file for now on. Unsyndicated Truth (talk) 10:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)- Comment - LTA stricken. Эlcobbola talk 14:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- The film (which is one of my personal favorites) is still under copyright in the United Kingdom because the principal creators have not been dead for 70 years. But this is just discussing the poster, which as you say was not simultanously published in the US, and had its US copyright restored by URAA on January 1, 1996. Abzeronow (talk) 22:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The {{PD-1996}} tag is incorrect since the poster was published 47 years before the UK URAA restoration date. hinnk (talk) 00:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Arista Records old logo
[edit]The old classic Arista Records logo has a unique shape forming an "A". Presumably, it's above the US's threshold of originality. Unsure why those files were exported to or created in Commons, but the logo should've been discussed in the first place. --George Ho (talk) 20:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - type faces, even intricate ones, do not have a copyright in the USA, -- See USCO Circ 33 "Copyright law does not protect typeface or mere variations of typographical ornamentation or lettering. A typeface is a set of letters, numbers, or other characters with repeating design elements that is intended to be used in composing text or other combinations of characters, including calligraphy. Generally, typeface, fonts, and lettering are building blocks of expression that are used to create works of authorship. The Office cannot register a claim to copyright in typeface or mere variations of typographic ornamentation or lettering, regardless of whether the typeface is commonly used or unique.". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
The buildings architect Gerhard Weber died in 1986 and Germany knows a standard of life + 70 years and there is no FoP for interior views in Germany
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Foyers 1.jpg
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Foyers 4.jpg
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Zuschauerraum 01.jpg
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Zuschauerraum 02.jpg
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Zuschauerraum 03.jpg
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Zuschauerraum 04.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F004311-0005, Hamburg, Staatsoper, Zuschauerraum, Ränge.jpg
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Zuschauerraum 05.jpg
- File:Hamburg Staatsoper Zuschauerraum 06.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F004311-0001, Hamburg, Staatsoper, Zuschauerraum.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, eigene Aufnahmen reiner Architektur sind in Deutschland meines Erachtens nach nicht urheberrechtsgeschützt. -- Kürschner (talk) 17:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Leider schon, schau mal den Absatz zur Architektur. Only external appearances. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would rather take the word of the Bundesarchiv over some anonymous user. If the Bundesarchiv donates a picture under the appropriate license, then that is good enough for Wikipedia. Further, pictures of interior architecture need to show such original elements of architecture, not just some spurious details. That is not the case in some of the pictures, in particular the Foyer. --Minderbinder (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Viriditas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://collections.okeeffemuseum.org/object/1148/
I had actually enquired about the copyright status of this 1939 painting by American painter Georgia O'Keeffe at the COM:VPC, and there was the tentative conclusion that it might be in the public domain in the US (Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/04#1934 painting by Georgia O'Keeffe). Are there further opinions? Rosenzweig τ 08:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I read your discussion. There’s no indication the painting was ever in the public domain. In your discussion, you said the paintings were sold in 1939 or thereafter. Only one painting from that series was sold in 1939, Cup of Ginger, and it immediately entered the collection of the Baltimore Museum of Art. This image of the painting in question was in the hands of Doris Bry, who at the time, represented O'Keeffe’s estate. The work was put up for sale in 1976-1977 for the first time. It’s preposterous to think that O'Keeffe let her copyright lapse, as she was fiercely defensive of her work and was obsessive about copyright. You said you looked though the Internet Archive files for evidence of copyright, but those are notoriously sparse. It’s insane to think O'Keeffe let her copyright lapse. I should note that O'Keeffe shows up a lot in the legal literature, so if these works were in the public domain, we would know. The O'Keeffe Foundation, notably issued a cease and desist letter in 1996 to Adobe, who were forced to destroy a photo CD with O'Keeffe’s images on it. The copyright literature is chock full of O'Keeffe defending her copyright, particularly in regards to images from the 1930s. Given what we know, it is unlikely that there is any other American artist who has so forcefully protected their work. To suggest that O'Keeffe let her copyright lapse doesn’t line up with what we know. Viriditas (talk) 11:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- OK, that is another opinion. And it's good that we get it here, spelled out, instead of just a speedy deletion request with nothing more than a URL. If you're already aware that there was a discussion regarding the copyright status of the file, a regular deletion request is the way to go unless said discussion had a crystal clear outcome. Which was not the case here. And could you please dial back a bit on adjectives like "preposterous", "insane" etc.? Thank you. --Rosenzweig τ 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- See Chapter 1900 (2021). Per 1905.1, the painting in question received "limited publication" in 1940 versus "general publication" when it was sold in the 1970s. "Section 101 of the Copyright Act states a work is published when copies or phonorecords of that work are distributed “to the public.” 17 U.S.C. § 101. Specifically, publication occurs when one or more copies or phonorecords are distributed to a member of the public who is not subject to any express or implied restrictions concerning the disclosure of the content of that work. If a work exists only in one copy – such as a painting embodied solely in a canvas – the work may be considered published if that copy is distributed to the public with the authorization of the copyright owner. No such copy was distributed until the 1970s. "A limited publication is the distribution of copies of a work to a definitely selected group with a limited purpose and without the right of diffusion, reproduction, distribution, or sale. A limited publication is not considered a distribution to the public and, therefore, is not publication." That describes the Georgia O'Keeffe: Exhibition of Oils and Pastels 1940 exhibition.[6] "...the work may be considered published if that copy is distributed to the public with the authorization of the copyright owner...[such as] Selling the original copy of a painting at an auction." That eventually occurred in 1976. This is also one of the many reasons O'Keeffe scholars have noted there is a dearth of critical literature on certain O'Keeffe paintings until after she died. If a particular painting was indeed "published", that facilitates critical commentary and attention, and leads to multiple works publishing image reproductions and essays about the work. In this case, the first major reproductions and essays about this work didn't occur until 1990, mostly because it wasn't "published" to the general public until 1976. Yes, several works from 1939 that were part of this series and appeared at the exhibition in 1940 did receive the status of "general publication", but that's because one of the works famously entered a major museum collection as a gift, and two other works were famously commissioned by a pineapple company for an ad campaign, and their PR department notoriously drummed up attention for those two works by publishing them in major American magazines in that same year. All three works received major coverage and had their images widely reproduced. That fulfills the criterion for general publication, whereas it is not met by White Bird of Paradise until the late 1970s. This is self-evident. For example, if we assume this painting was published to the general public in 1939-1940, we would expect to see some attention given to it, or at least reproductions made like we do the other three works from the same series. There is none until 1990. Viriditas (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- OK, that is another opinion. And it's good that we get it here, spelled out, instead of just a speedy deletion request with nothing more than a URL. If you're already aware that there was a discussion regarding the copyright status of the file, a regular deletion request is the way to go unless said discussion had a crystal clear outcome. Which was not the case here. And could you please dial back a bit on adjectives like "preposterous", "insane" etc.? Thank you. --Rosenzweig τ 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete In all of the discussion above, no one has mentioned the word "notice". I don't see anything that meets the requirements of Section 18 of the 1909 Act for notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, still under copyright. Undelete in 2073. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
This template has multiple issues and should be either fixed or deleted. According to CRT "The situation regarding copyright is unclear" with 4 possible copyright laws which might be applicable: Jordanian, Israeli, Egyptian and British and each one has different terms. The template itself is not comprehensible
- First sentence says that work is PD and to see CRT for details: the page that states that copyright situation is unclear
- Second sentence mentions British law, "Arab Copyright Treaty of 1981" (which does not seem to apply to Palestine), "Basic Law of governmental Palestine" (?) and " Israeli copyright laws" in a way that makes no sense to me.
- Sentence three: mirrors {{PD-anon-70}}
- Sentence four: mirrors {{PD-IsraelGov}}
I think we should delete this template and review handful of files using it to see if {{PD-anon-70}} or {{PD-IsraelGov}} apply. Than maybe we can write a new template to cover British Copyright Ordinance of 1924 and Copyright Act of 1911, if there is consensus that those laws still apply, as seem to be the case in CRT and Village pump. --Jarekt (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aymatth2, JWilz12345, Clindberg, and Asclepias: --Jarekt (talk) 00:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think our best guess is that the UK 1911 Copyright Act (as applied to Palestine in 1924 or something) is still the law in place. I don't think any of Egypt, Jordan, or Israel has applied their copyright laws there, even if under their control. I'm not sure we should delete the tag, as it would be useful for works that originate from there, as the law could easily change and we may need to identify them. The tag claims that Israeli laws apply, and not sure I've ever seen a reference for that statement. The 1924 ordinance (which applied the UK 1911 law, with some small modifications) is in place though. I think we should change this to be a 50pma tag basically, with photos 50pr. I would not try to use generic tags as it is useful to be able to categorize/check photos using this tag in case the situations change. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete "I think our best guess is that the UK 1911 Copyright Act (as applied to Palestine in 1924 or something) is still the law in place." I'm very uncomfortable with guessing here. The template shouldn't exist unless we're absolutely sure about the applicable laws (and can explain them better). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and modify the language per Lindberg. --RAN (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Should we be applying the loosest of copyrights or the most stringent in effect? Maybe it would help to ask a copyright attorney in the West Bank, if such a person exists? Probably Bethlehem or Ramallah if anywhere Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've emailed a copyright attorney in Ramallah to see if there is perhaps a simpler answer at this point so we can get this matter closed once and for all. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 00:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Carl Lindberg. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)