Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 11th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 01:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 02:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletion Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porfavor eliminar este archivo fue un error de parte mio Joel antonio ruiz (talk) 10:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Esto no tiene nada que ver conla pagina Joel antonio ruiz (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vandoaibadanh555777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably copyvios, given the uploader's track record. Some may be confirmed, and others may just be spammy.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unecessary duplicate of existing Commons file. See File:José_Aniceto_Iznaga_Borrell.jpg Geoff Who, me? 14:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brandify Global Services (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images that seem to have no relevance to this or other Foundation projects

Herby talk thyme 13:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brandify Global Services (talk · contribs)

[edit]

G10

Trade (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That is not the locator map of Mempawah Regency. It is actually the locator map of Kubu Raya Regency. 2001:448A:11A1:1FD8:419C:6181:630B:263A 10:06, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Regardless as to whether or not this is titled correctly, the file's presently COM:INUSE on several wikis. We can't delete files for project scope-related reasons (such as being completely erroneous) when it's in-use by a local wiki. What we can do is rename the file; when this is kept, I would suggest that we try to verify if the IP's claims are correct and, if they are, then rename this file to correspond with reality. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks like it was already renamed by Vis M. holly {chat} 00:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion nomination to make way for file upload that shows the correct boundaries of Mempawah Regency with a consistent title format, see OpenStreetMap Twotwofourtysix (talk) 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm withdrawing my nomination, turns out I can do this without the page being deleted first. Twotwofourtysix (talk) 16:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded several images under the same file by mistake PJeganathan 19:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete mistake image. TheEasternEditer (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical 1960s image collage of body types. Likely not own work but taken from a sales publication. P 1 9 9   13:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I drew these by hand, not even from tracing any individual photo because I am very well aware of copyright rules. I have uploaded nearly 6,000 original images, what makes you think I will upload a copyvio and call it my own? mr.choppers (talk)-en- 13:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that clarification. Yes, you have indeed uploaded a lot of photos, but no other drawings AFAICT. This upload is therefore very out of place, and as I already said, it has the look of a 60's advertisement. --P 1 9 9   15:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I am telling you I drew them by hand, scanned them, and then drew the different variants. Why would I endanger 15 years editing Wikipedia by a) uploading a copyvio and b) lying about it?
Anyhow, I uploaded an intermediate variant of my base drawing to Flickr back in 2013, before I had colored in the tires and with a red mask on the background for some reason. An apology would be welcome - what if I wasn't here to defend my work and you had this deleted based on its "look"? It wouldn't be the end of the world, but it would still be a waste. What else have you nominated for deletion on similar shaky grounds? mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn per uploader's statement above. AGF. --P 1 9 9   13:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete per WCIN Saqib (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This specific images does not appear to have been taken as official duty for governor's office (appears to have been instead private work for Deval Patrick's campaign operation) SecretName101 (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This specific images does not appear to have been taken as part of his official duty for governor's office (appears to have been instead private work for Deval Patrick's campaign operation) SecretName101 (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portrait actually quite evidently appears not to have been taken as part of photographers duties as a state employee; but rather likely taken on commission for the campaign or for some other non-state capacity SecretName101 (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This specific images does not appear to have been taken as part of his official duty for governor's office (appears to have been instead private work for Deval Patrick's campaign operation) SecretName101 (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover, certainly not CC licensed. 2003:C0:8F1C:7D00:A146:7BA0:AF1B:D93C 00:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Delete, not big enough. 200.39.139.4 22:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete does not illustrate a large rooster Dronebogus (talk) 13:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wdcrj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by seeming company rep for what seems like an investor deck; out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doctor of Directions (talk · contribs)

[edit]
Files

All uploads appear to be print screens lifted from websites and Google street view, see talk page. All claimed as own work, unlikely any of them are.

Discussion

[edit]

BevinKacon (talk) 10:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment From a quick review of thirty images through time, they all look to be copyright violations. I have asked the contributor to identify which of their uploads are clearly theirs so we can manually review those. Otherwise we should be bulk deleting images of this user. @WMSR: I have left a message for user. Noting that if images are listed here, then removing DR nominations for the page is not going to achieve much, maybe a slight delay, not much else.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

further  Comment I have managed a conversation with the contributor, and have asked them to stop reverting nominations for deletion. I believe that we are dealing with a person trying to make valid contributions, and we need to approach this with AGF, and take a little time to have a conversation, and this can be resolved amicably. I think that there is a mixture of user images, and web images, and we should be able to work with the contributor to identify which are to be kept, and which are to be deleted. I also think that some of those that have been deleted look to be user contributed, so I ask that there be a hold on deletions for the moment until the user's block is resolved and they are able to provide feedback.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter, Ebrahim, and Hedwig in Washington: pings as deletors of some of the uploads.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst: I checked my deletion, I didn't find any not tagged as sourced from Google Street View or Youtube.Anyway, if one of my deletions turns out to be a valid file, no objection to restore from my side. We all make a bubu once in a while. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

billinghurst sDrewth 10:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter, Ebrahim, and Hedwig in Washington: pings as deletors of some of the uploads.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst:

I would like to note that the following photos are mine that are not from Google Maps, nor YouTube, that have mistakenly been placed in the speedy deletion category:

claimed files

Thanks-−Doctor of Directionstalk 12:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doctor of Directions: Where are the images from? They lack metadata, which they should include if you indeed took them. WMSR (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@WMSR: I asked the same question at the user's talk page, and that is consistent with many camera models lacking metadata capability, and those that I have reviewed are 2009 and earlier.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Doctor of Directions: So to confirm, you are claiming these photos as yours. Any other photographs uploaded by you have an alternate source with unknown copyright and can be deleted.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst: Check [1] SD found for File:WMATA 2001 CNG New Flyer C40LF bus idling at the Fort Totten Metro Station after completing its trip.jpg --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hedwig in Washington: Yep, and [2] which is why I am waiting for the user to confirm their information, and then to be able have such discussions. I do note that the upload is of greater quality than the link, so am wondering where the image journey originates.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I Deleted: some per nomination, obviously not own work. I am conflicted about the statement of own work on the list above, there seem to be variable styles, colors & white balances involved. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst: Fine with me; we can't have enough cucumber bus / public transport photographs. ;-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst and Hedwig in Washington: Looking at the user's uploads, there are still several clear copyvios from Google Street View, as you can see the street labels in the images. WMSR (talk) 17:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@WMSR: no doubt, which is why I have engaged in a conversation with the uploader so we can have some testing of the veracity of the approach. AGF is about assumption and then testing and checking, not about blind faith. I was hoping that Doctor of Directions would be continuing with the conversation after their original declarations, and it is not reassuring to meet the silence, though new users do need to learn our ways.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
billinghurst I agree, but DoD has been editing en-wiki since June 2017. Surely by now, at very least, the user should know how to sign posts or use the ping template properly. I don't know what the issue is, but if this were en-wiki I would say it's WP:CIR. DoD may be relatively new to Commons, but this is getting excessive. And no matter how much good faith we have, images from Street View are still copyvios. WMSR (talk) 02:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
billinghurst and WMSR I will comment on the fact, that I was shocked on how far we all have to get through. When I captured out over these issues, I constantly removed these images on the articles, as I knew these were copyvio images. Other than when I notified DoD (from this conversation w:User talk:Doctor of Directions#Google maps Image on WMATA Metrobus articles.), another en-wikipedia user (and user on commons here) Swagging pointed out Google Maps images before me on this conversation here (w:User talk:Doctor of Directions#Bus Pictures), as it is from October 19, 2019. I wish a solution can come up to end the Google Maps Street View, Youtube, and other copyvio image nonsense. Leobran2018 (talk) 00:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. User disappeared and stopped communicating. No evidence that any images are the users uploads, and enough evidence that significant numbers are not.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doctor of Directions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor quality photos of random sections of two maps. While good scans of the maps would obviously be in scope, these photos do not constitute any kind of useful scan. The photos are at varying zoom levels and angles, so it is not possible to stitch them together into the full maps. Many of the photos are duplicates - see File:WMATA Metrobus Route Map May, 1974 Part 49.jpg and File:WMATA Metrobus Route Map May, 1974 Part 48.jpg for a typical example.

Additionally, there is a copyright issue with the images. The uploader variously claims CC0 and CC-BY-SA, but they are not the creator of the map. The poor and incomplete scans prevent me from being able to determine whether the maps would qualify for public domain exemption.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doctor of Directions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these are copyrighted maps and therefore cannot be kept on Commons. Note that WMATA is an independent tri-state compact and therefore these are not creations of the Federal government.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website has text context licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0, but also explicitly states "For license to republish any audio, video or image content, please get in touch with the Peoples Dispatch Team.". This would require an OTRS. Juxlos (talk) 04:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. According to the source only the text released under CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The file appears in this site in JUNE 29, 2023, before it was posted in the firs source (peoplesdispatch.org). Under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Even though the YouTube video releases the video under Creative Commons Attribution license. They can not release content the they are not the copyright owner. Even the name of the author does not mention in both sites. Also it's look like a derivative work, illustration based on some photograph. -- Geagea (talk) 07:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. No wiggle room there. Alexpl (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Greetings. I am the author of this illustration. Is based on a photograph of Daqqah and it was made, as Geagea linked above, for the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research via its Art Department (which I am a part of). All the creations (image, video or text) that are made for the institute is under a CC BY-NC 4.0 and that includes this image.
    The information needed can be updated accordingly. Daniruggeri (talk) 14:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on Pexels, unfortunately published after July 2018 so {{Pexels}} cannot be applied A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published date was 11 July 2018, sadly 5 days after the license switch per {{Pexels}} A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was completed in 1971 and designed by architects Dinu Hariton, Gheorghe Nădrag, Ion Moscu and Romeo Belea per enwiki article. Romania has no commercial freedom of panorama, and COM:OTRS permission from them (or their heirs) for these freely-licensed images is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept 2 per Razvan Socol. --Minoraxtalk 11:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Romania.

A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Kept 1. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tahlilfa.rap (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, self-promotional images uploaded by youtuber; out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 06:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 07:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test file, fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 07:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yield numerous results on Google Lens dated before uploading to Commons A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Specifically the file appears on https://tibet.net/us-ambassador-to-india-visits-dharamshala/ dated 2018 and credited to "Tenzin Dhamchoe/OHHDL". --bjh21 (talk) 13:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

while the youtube video is released under a free license but the video has watermark which means it still a copyright video and PTI (youtube channel) doesn't own the copyright over this video Saqib (talk) 13:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

while the youtube video is released under a free license but the video has watermark of DG IPR which means it still a copyright video and PTI (youtube channel) doesn't own the copyright over this video Saqib (talk) 13:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete per WCIN Saqib (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D work in Hong Kong. It seems Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hong Kong#Freedom of panorama doesn't include this. Yann (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, missing COM:VRT permission. P 1 9 9   17:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1959 painting by an artist who died in 1990. Undelete in 2061. Abzeronow (talk) 23:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could find no evidence that Dutch Space has ever released content under a free license. Its website states "All Rights Reserved" even at the time of the upload. [3] Assuming this file was indeed released under a license, then a link to the exact source is needed. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

agreed A.T.M.Schipperijn (talk) 12:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image must be removed. A.T.M.Schipperijn (talk) 10:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was in a hurry, and, as it turned out, in this photo it is not Vadim Ershov, but Alexey Vygovsky. Since the photo with Vygovsky most likely contains other copyrights, it should be deleted IskoPlay (talk) 03:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cannot find the image from the source, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly identified - this is Papilio xuthus EGardenere (talk) 05:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Then please fix the description and use {{Rename}} to request file rename. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion per PaterMcFly. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken illegally, see https://www.thecrossroadsmall.com/code-of-conduct Till (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: violating a mall code of conduct has nothing to do with copyright law. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken illegally, see https://www.thecrossroadsmall.com/code-of-conduct Till (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: violating a mall code of conduct has nothing to do with copyright law. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the given author Hoyanova (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uploader and reviewer. As indicated on the file page, this image was uploaded to Picasa under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. It was reviewed by me in 2010 to confirm the license. There is therefore no issue of permission. Pruneautalk 08:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to doubt the validation + it says (cc) in the watermark. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted banners A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not an "own work" as it should be, but an own photograph of a copyrighted work. Probably a page from some book. BasileusAutokratorPL (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Does not really add much value anyway. We have plenty of items in Category:Maps of Świnoujście. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A completely dark image, nothing can be seen A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete ... except a (c) remark, which would even make the license dubious. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mancata censura di persone Julian.Schindler (talk) 12:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Túrelio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Julian Pawlowski M2k~dewiki (talk) 14:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Spain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Libya.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

•Please Delete.Thanks• SekisounoAestivum (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Krd. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

•Please Delete This Audio•QvO SekisounoAestivum (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Krd. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright, A watermark appears on the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image has been updated. No copyright watermark. Willybonty95 (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is still a copyvio. You upload files from other people. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A fictitious flag proposed as a work of fiction. Vichycombo (talk) 16:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A fictitious coat of arms proposed as a work of fiction. Vichycombo (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A fictitious coat of arms proposed as a work of fiction. Vichycombo (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:L WalrusMichele (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Несвободный AlexeyKhrulev (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Це авторська робота, вона є вільною до використання в не комерційних цілях. BlackStar1991 (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Тогда для начала нужно изменить текущую лицензию PD-US, укажать автора и конкретный источник (не просто Телеграм, а ссылку на конкретный пост). AlexeyKhrulev (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Для Викисклада нужно и "в коммерческих". Lesless (talk) 03:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. --Brateevsky {talk} 10:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate. This should be replaced with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:F%C3%BCl%C3%B6p_L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3_-_XIII._Le%C3%B3_p%C3%A1pa_-_3206_-_Hungarian_National_Gallery.jpg ⍨PLib🗣️ 17:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image. Accidentally uploaded as a test. It must be deleted. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by seeming company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company rep ("sandu" -> Skill & You); no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shertoy7400 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely brand rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashwin.ashok24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by seeming company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM; slide from advertisement w/ no education value out of context Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bambang Yoe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside sandbox and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SnoopChrist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Trade (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nourafakhry90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Trade (talk) 19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nourafakhry90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 01:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nourafakhry90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frazierl41990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Trade (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope?

Trade (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariagata1959 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has been uploading files from multiple sources and authors without any free licence verification.

 Keep Painting from the 1820ies, PD. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~Cybularny Speak? 01:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete all. The uploader does not edit Wikipedia, so nearly no file is in use. Although some may or may not be PD, the uploader's claims cannot be trusted, and individual checks in this amount are not achievable. Delete all per PCP and consider to block user if uploading of doubtful useless files continues before everything is cleaned up. --Krd 11:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, two kept by request above. Note: some of the user's other uploads may be PD, but as they are all from 3rd party sources with claims by very unreliable uploader, Commons is better off without them. This does not prejudge reupoad of any verifiably PD image with accurate verifiable information. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariagata1959 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's a few hundred more of these which are all similar in nature (an image of a solid color with a name and HTML color code overlaid on it). Any objection if I add the rest? Omphalographer (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it makes you happy, add it Mariagata1959 (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you uploaded these? Trade (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No response from the uploader, so I'm adding the following 404 (!) images to the nomination. I realize this is a lot, but these images were all created en masse; it shouldn't take more effort to remove them than it did to upload them.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope 186.173.162.245 20:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ho cambiato idea e vorrei rimuovere questa immagine Manuel Ambrogioni (talk) 19:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Trade (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Õigustaja69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality COM:OOS drawings

Nutshinou Talk! 21:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: Yup. Rubbish. - THV | | U | T - 04:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope, only text Nutshinou Talk! 21:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The date of the descritpion and the metadata do not correspond, Picture taken from the back, Only upload of this account, Dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Infractionmuusic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Upload of copyrighted material related to Ivan Malkov

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BLP Vandalism OverlordQ (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MichaelHadford75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Shaun Ferraloro is mentionned in the metadata

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a concert CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains an image that was already deleted due to copyright violations Mayhair (talk) 22:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giacomoricciuto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Babahaft99982 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a self published work, and hence not suitable for Wikipedia. Pallav.journo (talk) 04:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture definitely is not of before 1960 as claimed in description to published it in public domain. Mr. Rajesh Khanna was born in 1942, and this picture by common sense is not of a teenager. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 14:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chronokernel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of authorship.

— Racconish💬 18:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir
ces photos appartiennent aux archives de la famille de M. Heftler-Louiche
gérés par son fils Jean-Marc Heftler-Louiche.
Merci de ne pas les effacer car la famille souhaite qu'elles soient publiques. Chronokernel (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Owning paper copies of photographs does not give one the right to freely license them -- that right belongs to the photographer and their heirs. There is no evidence here of any license from the copyright holders. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chronokernel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of authorship

— Racconish💬 18:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir
ces photos appartiennent aux archives de la famille de M. Heftler-Louiche
gérés par son fils Jean-Marc Heftler-Louiche.
Merci de ne pas les effacer car la famille souhaite qu'elles soient publiques. Chronokernel (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Owning a copy of a photograph is not the same as owning its copyright. Only the copyright owner can license the work. — Racconish💬 20:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (but kept the 1908 anonymous photograph).
@Chronokernel: Il faut que les hérities écrivent à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org en donnant toutes les informations nécessaires à la publication (auteur, date, etc.) afin que les photos soient publiées. Merci. Ruthven (msg) 12:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chronokernel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The source indicates a no-free license: "Toutes les photos sont publiés sous licence CC BY-ND 4.0 et proviennent des archives de la famille Heftler-Louiche."

Ruthven (msg) 12:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toutes les photos sont publiés sous licence CC BY 4.0 et proviennent des archives de la famille Heftler-Louiche. Chronokernel (talk) 13:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[4]https://serge-heftler-louiche.com/
on bottom :
"Toutes les photos sont publiés sous licence CC BY 4.0 et proviennent des archives de la famille Heftler-Louiche" Chronokernel (talk) 13:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Owning a copy of a photo -- as in this archive -- does not give the owner the right to freely license it. That right is held by the photographer or his heirs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shitty quality, out of scope, against „Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose.“. This image is extremely blurry. 2A02:810D:4ABF:DBE4:A1A5:4B1F:6CF:1087 11:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown flag with meaningless filename and description, possibly out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 12:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as an out of scope personal file, also File:F9jvAgmbcAAQYY2 (3).jpg. Used to promote the strange rabbithole of countless Twitter accounts that identify with this symbol (or a similar one): https://twitter.com/Fallnlstatelof1 Nutshinou Talk! 22:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Not useful for Wikipedia Wizardofwords25 (talk) 01:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely COM:FLICKR photo. Belongs to Spurs/NBA: https://twitter.com/spurs/status/1672670454400647169, https://www.nba.com/spurs/photos/first-time-in-uniform Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material from https://dglnews.pl/2021/01/29/50-lecie-huty-miedzi-glogow-cz-1/ Michał Sobkowski (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Close photo of a non-free book cover. Most probably a spam Ignatus (talk) 18:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement edited photo of a proprietary book cover (possibly a Youtube video screenshot) Ignatus (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a screenshot from copyrighted software 3dollarsinmybankaccount (talk) 18:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorization, photograph has been taken by pro photographer Steve Banks, still alive in 2024 Skimel (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio. According metadata, the photographer is "Thomas F. Starke". Uploader is "MWRW". Drahreg01 (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The movie was published in 1937, not before 1929 Trade (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The movie is public domain. Literally all you had to do was look at the article to see that it was public domain. Here it is on the Internet Archive: [5]--LadybugStardust (talk) 22:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the original Chinese film poster from its 1937 release by Mingxing Film Company and Star Film. Again, the film is public domain and, as such, so is the poster.--LadybugStardust (talk) 02:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/China would the correct status be {{PD-China-1996}} ? (Date of the file needs to be fixed as well.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Uhhh... yeah, I guess. Sorry, I don't have much experience on Wikimedia Commons (even though I've edited Wikipedia for decades). Why does the title of the file need to change? The film's release date is 1937, which is why I put (1937) in it.--LadybugStardust (talk) 04:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not the title, the date "11 April 2024" should be the date of the poster not Commons upload, minor point but one that ought to be done if editing the file description to be accurate. Welcome to Commons - going forward be aware of the fact that media needs to be free licensed in both source country and the USA, do your best to be accurate, and you should generally be good. If you have questions about Commons you're having trouble finding answers to, ask. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: License and info corrected, I believe (if anyone more familiar with old China copyright law can improve or correct further please do so.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copie de https://www.lejsl.com/defense-guerre-conflit/2023/06/13/a-22-ans-il-veut-etre-un-apprenti-reporter-en-terrain-de-guerre Habertix (talk) 00:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The logo and design visible on the bottle is copyrighted. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 08:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely copyvio Alexeyevitch (talk) 12:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, on Xitter 2 weeks before claimed creation date. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 186.172.155.136 13:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, online elsewhere years earlier. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no indication of free license from actual copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A fictitious flag proposed as a work of fiction. 2001:2D8:6932:6A1F:A0E4:CEEE:438A:FF22 17:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped from https://www.sankei.com/article/20220511-FGJLYUEY35P55OLZA6I2EI3KJQ/photo/AFWNQLIERJMAXKWN5HWKU3RRDU/ eien20 (talk) 17:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1967; no freedom pf panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in 2021. The primary source is facebook.com but the Facebook post does not have any license information. Said to be published by Tbilisi Transport Company whose web site says: " All Rights Reserved © 2024 Tbilisi Transport Company". I can't find any relevant copyright exemptions at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Georgia. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually contacted the TTC for the matter of the license and permission of this photograph to be republished on Wikimedia Commons. They said it is okay and allowed me to upload the file, which was initially only published on FB. In that case, maybe the licensing info should be switched to free license? Sakweb (talk) 16:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. (If explicit free license from copyright holder is demonstrated per COM:VRT, can be undeleted.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" dated 2023 for a photo of someone who died in 1993 is, to my knowledge, not feasible. Uploader has an history of copyright violations. Nutshinou Talk! 21:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the name of this file is wrong. she is a girl, not a shemale. 37.129.42.104 23:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the name of this file is wrong. the word "shemale" must be deleted. 83.122.86.146 23:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also dubious sourcing and license, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the previous request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Interior of St. Sebastian (Ludwigshafen-Mundenheim) it was argued that the organ is in focus. I disagree, we primarily see architecture and stained glass windows here, and the organ is nearly de-minimis itself. No FOP, no permission. Krd 09:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep newly cropped version and delete previous revisions. The image is currently in use to illustrate the organ. The architectural elements and stained glass have now been removed. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: three revisions deleted; no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Erstens haben wir keinen Beleg, dass dies wirklich zutrifft (könnte jeder behaupten), und zweitens ist das Bild offensichtlich bei einem öffentlichen Auftritt entstanden. Da muss man damit rechnen, fotografiert zu werden. Wende dich gegebenenfalls an COM:VRT. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: follow advice in DR; no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die abgebildete Person möchte, dass dieses Bild entfernt wird. Visible Artists (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio! 186.172.125.139 14:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license tag: This toy is not 2D. Maybe, it should be {{PD-author}}, but unsure. Ankry (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader seems to have confused the license of the picture with the license of the object depicted (which is sometimes confusing). Looks like the image is freely licensed (by the museum) and the object is PD due to its age. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, probably. But is anybody willing to fix this? Note: the "Copyright undetermined" note make me doubt if this is really free. Ankry (talk) 14:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That indeed needs someone who has a better understanding of whether the linked license from the museum is sufficient for commons. They make a lot of reservations, for which again it is not really clear whether they impact the image or the object. PaterMcFly (talk) 09:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The old toy is Public Domain (PD) as it is over 100 years old from the Museum's information. The photo is intended to be Public Domain, so the "PD-author" tag looks good. Also, @PaterMcFly, should this same tag be added to the other 74 photos of antique toys in this category? Category:Toys in the Missouri History Museum
@Ankry, the link to "Copyright Undetermined" is related to the object (toy). Quote:
The copyright and related rights status of this Item has been reviewed by the organization that has made the Item available, but the organization was unable to make a conclusive determination as to the copyright status of the Item. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use."
I agree with PaterMcFly who wrote, "... the object is PD due to its age." Ankry, you wrote, "the "Copyright undetermined" note make me doubt if this is really free." If we determine the "item" or object is Public Domain, then the quote above supports that it is free. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 21:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is unclear what is the copyright status of the photo, not the object. Modern photos of PD non-2D objects are copyrighted. Copyright in most cases belongs to the photographer. Do we have an evidence of free license? Ankry (talk) 00:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In closing this discussion, I am determining that the UND relates to the object, and the photo is released under "MHS Open Access Policy". Both would be in the public domain in that regard.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No good way to wrap a licence in this situation like you can with {{PD-art}}  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File obtained from Leader.ir, which is not freely-licensed HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by POS78 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license King of ♥ 08:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is soured from Leader.ir, which is not freely-licensed. It was deleted once and seems to be re-uploaded again. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad scan and probably studio photo under copyright, not a personal work Voxhominis (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 186.172.155.136 13:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the license at the source is BY-NC-SA, not CCBYSA and thus WMC-incompatible; please change it Prototyperspective (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as no source (No source since), whilst the file appears to be in good resolution and rightly uploaded as own work. ─ Aafī (talk) 14:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is a single-purpose account, on Commons as well as on fr-wp, which username is translated as "Mayor's office". The author is not identified and its permission is not provided. Gyrostat (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: metadata complete, and no evidence that the statements are wrong, the username should only be part of a narrative, no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Music album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


@Krd: your bot has tagged this for a file you deleted. Can I leave that with you?  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination by Krd.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: subject of photo and the uploader probably don't mean photographer' use Com:VRT if undelete needed.per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 16:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 16:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Useful drawing of technical object. Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Please explain its specific educational significance? Or what topics do you think this image would be used for? Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 07:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This is a drawing of a contact that's used in relays. It is significant in the field of electrical engineering. Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Herbert Ortner: care to add something useful to the description to provide better context? Thanks if you can.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; living artist, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Logo ist das allererste, das der Radiosender benutzt hat. Mittlerweile sieht das Logo ganz anders aus, dieses hier erscheint aber bei Google noch ganz oben David das klar ist (talk) 19:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can it be removed from Google's index so that it no longer appears in searches? David das klar ist (talk) 06:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You'll have to ask Google. --Rosenzweig τ 07:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo. The file isn't on the linked source page, but it can be found on https://chkalovblago.ru/xram-v-chest-preobrazheniya-gospodnya-s-vershilovo/. That page says nothing about any free licence, though. There's a watermark on the image, "© DmitryPonomarev.ru", which disagrees with the claimed author. A higher-resolution version of the picture can be found on http://dmitryponomarev.ru/%d1%86%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%ba%d0%be%d0%b2%d1%8c-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%be%d0%b1%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%b6%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%8f-%d0%b3%d0%be%d1%81%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%b4%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d0%b2-%d0%b2%d0%b5%d1%80%d1%88/. The footer of that page says "Коммерческое использование фотоматериалов сайта запрещено без предварительного разрешения", which Google Translate renders as "Commercial use of photographic materials from the site is prohibited without prior permission". That's incompatible with COM:L. bjh21 (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOO, as a work which originates and was designed by a UK artist (Jonathan Barnbrook), it would be bound to the Threshold of Originality of the UK - which is very low. I see the file is already on En Wiki as Files ineligible for copyright in the United States but not in their source countries here. It states do not copy to Commons. Seems the've flown under the rader, cover should be deleted from Commons and kept as-is on EnWiki.

PascalHD (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vmfpablo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable copyright violation. A variety of professional photos of a rock group. All are tagged as "own work", but Exif metadata suggests multiple authors. File:Pablo montoya 3.jpg, File:Testigo 16.jpg, File:Testigo 17.jpg, and File:Testigo 23.jpg have camera model "Canon EOS 6D" and author "Luis Martinez Perez". File:Testigo 21.jpg has author "GSIFotografia". File:Pablo montoya.jpg has author "EY!ColectivoGrafico-Tute Delacro". File:Benjamin Ledesma testigo.jpg, File:Marcelo matos.jpg, File:Pablo montoya 1.jpg, and File:Pablo montoya 2.jpg have camera model "NIKON D7500". File:Testigo 08.jpg, File:Testigo 09.jpg, and File:Testigo 10.jpg have camera model "NIKON D850". File:Benjamin Ledesma.jpg, File:Pablo Montoya.jpg, and File:Testigo 03.jpg have camera model "NIKON D7100". That's four different cameras across two makes, and three different author names. I think the user's other uploads should be deleted as a precaution. Apart from these pictures, the uploader's only other contributions to Wikimedia projects are 1 reverted edit and 147 deleted edits on Wikidata.

bjh21 (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Las fotografias son de mi autoria y tengo mas fotos e información para agregar sobre este artista y muchos mas. Gracias Vmfpablo (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per author's comment; no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parc des Princes opened in 1972. It was done by architects en:Roger Taillibert (1926-2019) and en:Siavash Teimouri (still living, born 1937) and France has no commericial FOP so we cannot keep this photograph unfortunately. Abzeronow (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator and its also of bad quality, out of scope. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an accurate representation of this type of extinguisher. This is a replica, not the real deal. May give people bad information. Firetech117 (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on el:Πυροσβεστήρας and en:Fire extinguisher and therefore should not be deleted simply for being inaccurate (see COM:NPOV). @Firetech117, if the current description is incorrect it would be best for you to update it (and ask for the file to be renamed if the filename is also incorrect). --bjh21 (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Firetech117: Also try {{Factual accuracy}} or one of the related templates.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The software is not CC- Wyslijp16 (talk) 06:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) doclys (❀) 06:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The logo visible on the bottle is copyrighted. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 08:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a logic. So without the brand name how could readers understand the brand? Why don't you try to delete this similar Coca Cola image file too? There are many similar images in Wikipedia. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0098_-_Coca-Cola_glass_bottle_(Germany).jpg#mw-jump-to-license
Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 03:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Threshold of originality. This particular logo contains some complex graphics which pass Threshold of originality. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 09:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled-down dupe of File:Partial Solar Eclipse - Brazil - 2007 (1363366141).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 11:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, requested to merge both, per Commons:History merging and splitting/Requests. --Ellywa (talk) 13:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Champion as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio, uploader does not appear to represent copyright holder Prototyperspective (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep (The user reverted my removal of the speedy DR pls make a normal deletion request if any: the youtube channel is "The Official Youtube channel for [...] Jasmine Rae") Prototyperspective (talk) 12:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please explain why you don't think my rationale does not meet the speedy deletion criteria per COM:CSD section F1? Champion (Talk) 12:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because, like I said, the youtube channel that uploaded the video with the CCBY license is the official Youtube channel for Jasmine Rae. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is irrelevant, unless the uploader of this file can prove they are associated with Jasmine Rae in some way. Champion (Talk) 13:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep https://www.jasminerae.com/videos embeds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a4RKrJO01A which is the file in question here, and which on YouTube has a CC-BY license. Additionally, https://www.jasminerae.com/ has a link to https://www.youtube.com/jasminerae1 and https://www.youtube.com/jasminerae1 lists the handle as @JasmineRaeMusic which matches this video. Dhx1 (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just in case the official website https://www.jasminerae.com is in question, the label stated is ABC Music and their official page for the album at https://www.abc.net.au/abcmusic/jasmine-rae-heartbeat/13923958 also embeds the file in question here, and this embedded YouTube file has the CC-BY license on YouTube. Dhx1 (talk) 23:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This states the album is copyrighted, and there is no evidence to the contrary. Champion (Talk) 01:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright owners can release work under multiple licenses at different points in time. Perhaps when the album was first released, there was only an agreement in place with ABC Music to be the exclusive distributor for CD sales and online digital music shops with no ability to grant other licenses, for a period of X years, with Y% royalties paid back to the copyright owner(s). Later on, one track of that album is then separately released by the copyright owner(s) with a CC-BY license on the official YouTube channel, hypothetically to try and increase brand awareness, market the remainder of the album, market a new album, market a tour, etc. By releasing a single track with a CC-BY license, the copyright owner(s) may have hoped that famous YouTuber's would reuse the music on their videos watched by millions of people, and some subset of those viewers using the -BY condition of the license then seek out the source of the music to find other similar (non CC-BY) music they can purchase, or discover that there is an upcoming tour they can purchase tickets for. Dhx1 (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is just hypothetical, until it is proven by the creator and the copyright holder, it doesn't matter. Champion (Talk) 02:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is hypothetical about the official website *and* the label both embedding and linking to the exact video in question that is CC-BY licensed on YouTube? Dhx1 (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't even need that since we can infer that a channel that clearly appears to be the official channel and uploads new videos of the artist with that video having that license for a long time is indeed the official channel and indeed deliberately licensed that video that way. Somebody would need to provide at a minimum indications that this isn't the case for such a DR to make sense. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, source page is showing the free CCBY license today, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a4RKrJO01A&ab_channel=JasmineRae. --Ellywa (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is the purpose of this comparison pictures? These are two different individuals. They are not gay, not a married couple. Why are two pictures pinned together? Who are the copyright owners of these two different pictures and then combined together to form one single image. The owner of the picture is not the copyright owner of the two images or even one image being made. There is a political vendetta and image falsification. This is against Wikipedia and WIkimedia rules and regulations. Please delete this image if copyright information has not been provided. Thanks. 122.171.23.43 21:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep. In use, copyright is documented at the source Flickr page. It is, in fact, possible for two men to appear in the same photograph without being a married couple. Please stop making disruptive deletion nominations for photos of these people (cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:RahulModi.jpg). Omphalographer (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shaan Sengupta as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The image of right is available on Wikipedia under different author and license with VRT permission. Can't be termed own work just by making a collage type. See File:Rahul Gandhi.jpg. The image on left is also on Commons. Yann (talk) 15:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original images may be or may not be free, we don't know, but it is unlikely that Global Panorama is the author. We need the source of each original images. Yann (talk) 08:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete One thing is confirm that Global Panorama can't be the author since both the images come from different sources. Also the image of left (Modi's) is from Modi's Flicker and on right (Rahul's) is allowed after VRT permission. When orginal images are seen, one was uploaded under 3.0 and other under 2.0. Then how can the uploader release it under a single license and claim that it is their work. If I take two images from internet and combine them or make a collage, that doesn't mean that I get the rights. ShaanSenguptaTalk 17:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The conversation seems to indicate that the work is a derived work that has two images that are able to be used. The discussion seems to be about appopriate licensing, and the conversation may be better at Com:VP/C, see Com:Collages too.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, I added the two source files with the different licenses. So reusers can think about it... which licensing is valid. --Ellywa (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original Flickr uploader credits a different photographer than what the metadata on Flickr says the photographer is. The Flickr page looks like license laundering to me. Abzeronow (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm the original uploader of the image. I took it from flickr and edited it, thinking that it was under creative commons. If there are licensing problems please delete it. Julen Artano (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Julen Artano: It is a derived work so please follow the protocols for that. Often the easiest way is to upload the original that can be held, and then point your derived work at the upload.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no need to delete, I added the name of the original flckr user as the first author. --Ellywa (talk) 14:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]