Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/03/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_12_delivers_cargo.jpg){kind=link}
![179 File:PMC "Wagner Group" official flag.png](#File:PMC_"Wagner_Group"_official_flag.png){kind=link}
![180 File:PMC "Wagner Group" commander's banner.png](#File:PMC_"Wagner_Group"_commander's_banner.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Por motivos pessoais História do Porto (talk) 23:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Uso de imagem particular Lokal333 (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Weak keep File cannot be deleted with the rationale provided above. A source should at least be specified. --Minoraxtalk 13:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. No source, no author. That way the file cannot stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Já existe outra imagem Semelhante Larissa2024 (talk) 01:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of a featured image Beano09photos (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted and redirected to duplicate. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Awesomefanumber1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not a notable person. personal files, see File:A beautiful picture of Fraydow.jpg's description
- File:Frayskino.jpg
- File:Fraydow and meech.jpg
- File:Fraydow before frayskino.jpg
- File:Fraydow when he first got the face tattoo.jpg
- File:Fraydow face tattoo.jpg
- File:Fraydow at the studio.jpg
- File:Fraydow when he first got the fraydow tattoo.jpg
- File:Rare picture of fraydow.jpg
- File:Fraydow before he was frayskino.jpg
- File:Picture of fraydow going to court.jpg
- File:A OG picture of fraydow.jpg
- File:A beautiful picture of Fraydow.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 01:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope still images from a Flickr video A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ошибка, не тот загрузил AngrenJST (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
{{Delete}} AngrenJST (talk) 08:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
背景に固有名詞が写っており不適切と判断した。 ビージェイペン (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guessitsavis as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found identical photo posted on Tripadvisor, do not believe to be freely licensed. |source=https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g298484-d6490689-Reviews-Gary_Tatintsian_Gallery-Moscow_Central_Russia.html#/media-atf/6490689/283154539:p/?albumid=-160&type=0&category=-160 Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have temporarily removed it on tripadvisor, as it was uploaded there in 2017 by me. I would be grateful if you could let me know how else I can prove the ownership of the photo. Andrew Tupalev (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. See above. --Yann (talk) 13:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Bedivere. --Achim55 (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for blog, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal 186.173.237.95 19:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal 186.173.237.95 19:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this photograph by mistake. It was my intention to use a photo showing just legs and not complete shop. Permission was not granted by other person visible. Kim Sherman (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request: picture uploaded by mistake. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Personal 186.173.237.95 19:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, several promotional images uploaded by company rep, no use and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company, no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
On new user userpage only 200.111.17.10 21:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy delete per nom, but why did you delete sppedy tag when such images are deleted on speedy basis? A09 (talk) 21:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- How do you know the person will not become a good contributor?! 200.111.17.10 22:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
low quality personal drawing, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Indeed. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 22:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, several promotional images uploaded by company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Because it is Logo grendel|khan 23:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3 - No FoP in France. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Because it is Logo grendel|khan 23:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3 - No FoP in France. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Blackcat 
02:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not delete. I am simply trying to create a page for myself to increase my digital presence. Thank you. Johnnybrannjr (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Good luck, Johnnybrannjr, but what makes you notable now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, F10. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Only text, not within the project's scope Nutshinou Talk! 00:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
random screenshot of a conversation, looks out of scope Nutshinou Talk! 00:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
low quality photograph with little meaning and no clear educational aspect — billinghurst sDrewth 00:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The image generated by MYOTee, I do not see the relevant copyright information on its official website, it is estimated that it is protected by copyright. Thyj (talk) 01:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Claimed license not seen at source site Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
claimed license not seen at source site Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
I do not see the claimed free license at the source webpage Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
I do not see the claimed license at the source website Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 02:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
unused uncat poor quality photo of sunset in unidentifed location Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
I do not see claimed license at source site Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
AI generated image only used for vandalism on Wikipedia ([1] & [2]) Counterfeit Purses (talk) 03:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry and unused still image from Flickr video, also potentially out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: deleted by User:Bedivere. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted by User:Bedivere. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Ingenuityscan (talk) 04:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Not every file must be used. We have even no category:3 flagpoles, so the photo is especially valuable. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- hi, this is my foto.. This is a square in the city where I live. The trees in this square were cut down by the authorities... I do not want it to be deleted. Pleas not deletion, good work. Kızıldeniz (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 20:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
user request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kızıldeniz (talk • contribs) 23:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, too late to withdraw irrevocable cc-by-sa-4.0 license, uploader appears to be implementing a scorched-earth policy. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
user request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kızıldeniz (talk • contribs) 23:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, too late to withdraw irrevocable cc-by-sa-4.0 license, uploader appears to be implementing a scorched-earth policy. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused file, uploader emailed me with a request to delete this file. I think a courtesy deletion should be granted here. Abzeronow (talk) 12:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- {{Vk}}
, still too late to withdraw irrevocable cc-by-sa-4.0 license.— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: When the original request was made, this file was about 3 months old, definitely within the window of a courtesy deletion. The uploader had emailed me, explaining why they wanted these two files deleted. I verified the issue, and told them that I couldn't speedy it, which they accepted. The uploader did not bring up copyright, and would prefer a discrete deletion here. After thinking about their request, I agreed with their reasoning. We can grant a courtesy deletion here. Abzeronow (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: Ok, welcome to mentorship. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: When the original request was made, this file was about 3 months old, definitely within the window of a courtesy deletion. The uploader had emailed me, explaining why they wanted these two files deleted. I verified the issue, and told them that I couldn't speedy it, which they accepted. The uploader did not bring up copyright, and would prefer a discrete deletion here. After thinking about their request, I agreed with their reasoning. We can grant a courtesy deletion here. Abzeronow (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
user request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kızıldeniz (talk • contribs) 23:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, too late to withdraw irrevocable cc-by-sa-4.0 license, uploader appears to be implementing a scorched-earth policy. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
user request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kızıldeniz (talk • contribs) 23:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, too late to withdraw irrevocable cc-by-sa-4.0 license, uploader appears to be implementing a scorched-earth policy. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused file. Uploader emailed me that they wish for this to be deleted. I think we should grant a courtesy deletion here. Abzeronow (talk) 12:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- {{Vk}}
, still too late to withdraw irrevocable cc-by-sa-4.0 license.— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: we as a community though can grant a courtesy deletion, which after reading and verifying, I had felt was the best course of action. Sorry for the vagueness, trying to respect the request the uploader had made in their email. Abzeronow (talk) 16:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
user request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kızıldeniz (talk • contribs) 23:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, too late to withdraw irrevocable cc-by-sa-4.0 license, uploader appears to be implementing a scorched-earth policy. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carrot2333 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Super-generic AI images which are easily replaceable by actual photos
- File:View by AI.png
- File:Lake view by AI.png
- File:Water view by ai.png
- File:Beautiful lake views.png
- File:Mountain, trees and lake.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
unused file, possibly not notable at all Estopedist1 (talk) 06:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
AI generated image that is incorrectly labelled as the birthplace of person who never existed. Image was used on a hoax page that was created on the nlwiki. MLTRock (talk) 09:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joonasavvo (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused files, not notable company/organization
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PropertyTaxAccountant (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promo images uploaded by company rep, no use and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by company, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
personal image, out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 08:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD 將軍澳 TKO 日出康城 LOHAS Park Road FV Montara residential building clubhouse events March 2023 Px3.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted screenshot. Solomon203 (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 11:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
No educational value Hoo man (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Anthony lister" London
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama for artistic works in the UK, so the copyright for these photographs belongs to the artist, Anthony Lister, not the photographers.
- File:Anthony Lister - White Church Lane (15047740547).jpg
- File:Streeet art - 321de.jpg
- File:Street art - 123a.jpg
- File:Image artwork -7ab.jpg
- File:Street art -124.jpg
- File:Street art -125.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for 3D works of art. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/"Anthony lister" London
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama for artistic works in the UK, so the copyright for these photographs belongs to the artist, Anthony Lister, not the photographers.
- File:Anthony Lister - White Church Lane (15047740547).jpg
- File:Streeet art - 321de.jpg
- File:Street art - 123a.jpg
- File:Image artwork -7ab.jpg
- File:Street art -124.jpg
- File:Street art -125.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted objects A1Cafel (talk) 13:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Agreed. // sikander { talk } 🦖 14:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company, no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Uploader acknowledges that they don't know who took the photo, meaning we don't have permission from the copyright holder. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 15:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Engineerchange as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: File is copyrighted by the state of Maryland in 1972. |source=https://msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc1100/sc1198/000000/000002/000000/000060/pdf/mdsa_sc1198_2_60.pdf (page 353)
Converting to DR for easier undeletion. Undelete in 2068. Abzeronow (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be photograph of TV screen - see, for example, w:Screen-door effect in bottom banner (and indeed presence of banner itself) Эlcobbola talk 20:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
False license and too little data to judge on potential public domain status per COM:Hirtle chart. A09 (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment The photo seems to come from https://www.sdsu.edu/about/facts-mission-and-history. It's possible the copyright has expired/lapsed. It's possible the uploader represents San Diego State University or has otherwise received permission from SDSU to release the image into the public domain. But neither is obvious from the information provided by the uploader. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unless SDSU owns copyright, the only legitimate person who may release the image in public domain is file's unknown author. A09 (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Polarlys. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
unneeded image of a soccer ball — billinghurst sDrewth 04:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Apparently a selfie, so permission from the photographer is needed. Yann (talk) 13:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's not a selfie. I took the foto by myself. Mitumial (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Non-commerical use per COM:FOP South Korea conflicts with licensing requirements on Wikimedia Commons. A09 (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Bulgaria. Part of the photo depicts copyrighted sculptural work and the rest is unused personal photo. In addition, if the uploader is himself depicted (look filename!), then own work is under doubt, maybe photographer's copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:OOS, fictional map. A09 (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails COM:LR, photo not found at source and no indication of free licenses. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails COM:LR, photo not found at source and no indication of free licenses. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please delete TUTRA PAHARI.jpg image this image in my private details show so please remove this image in wekimedia page Government814150 (talk) 07:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nominator is not the original uploader account; no name seen in EXIF. (If there is a specific problem with EXIF, please have original uploader account email COM:VRT, EXIF can be edited or removed.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Sir yah page hmare dvara bnaya gya hai jisme mahoday sabhi image AEK hi image anek jagah prakasit ho gye Hain aur kuchh iss image me privacy hone ke karan in sabhi image aur es page ko delete yaa hatane ki kurpya karen mahoday,sir Government814150 (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment User:TUTRA PAHARI TEMPLE, the original uploader of this image has disruptively edited this deletion request (see history). The gist of the edit summaries seem to suggest that the uploader wants the image deleted as well. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per original section. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD 將軍澳 TKO 日出康城 LOHAS Park MTR Station shop 鴻福堂 Hung Fook Tong food March 2023 Px3 04.jpg
[edit]
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD 將軍澳 TKO 日出康城 LOHAS Park MTR Station shop 鴻福堂 Hung Fook Tong food March 2023 Px3 10.jpg
[edit]
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD 將軍澳 TKO 日出康城 LOHAS Park MTR Station shop 鴻福堂 Hung Fook Tong food March 2023 Px3 05.jpg
[edit]
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WayKurat as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Philippines seems to have a low threshold of originality, per COM:TOO Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WayKurat as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Philippines seems to have a low threshold of originality, per COM:TOO Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WayKurat as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Philippines seems to have a low threshold of originality, per COM:TOO Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
It is CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, not CC BY 4.0 MRTFR55 (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete 1949 press clipping from Germany or Austria (perhaps Switzerland), probably still copyrighted in its country of origin and most likely also in the US (URAA). The file can be restored in 2070 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. --Rosenzweig τ 13:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal files of fictional flags/country maps; out of scope
- File:Ethnic pop of vajtland.png
- File:Vajt land old flag meaning.png
- File:Vajt land current flat.png
- File:Bumbaland.png
- File:The operation Oluja.png
- File:Giresiyan conquest.png
- File:Vajtland colony first template-sablon for their extend of colony.png
- File:Beggining of vjatland.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I was uncertain about nominating this page for deletion. However, I think COM:EDUSE covers it. This layout was used on a bevy of Wikipedia pages to depict the layout of an orchestra. However, it is so laughably incorrect and filled with misspellings that I genuinely think it is detrimental to the project. Why are the contrabassoon and bassoon separate? (Same for cornet and trumpet; and piccolo and flute.) Why is there both a contrebass [sic] and a double bass section? They're the same thing! Why is timpani using the Spanish term timbale? There is so, so much wrong with this file. Why? I Ask (talk) 07:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's not good, but it's COM:INUSE. Why? I Ask, why don't you remove it from all articles that are using it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- What an absolutely stupid provision. But yes, I have gone ahead an removed it everywhere. Why? I Ask (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! And now, Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! And now,
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammadzaidmansoori8 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Persona; images of non-notable non-contributor. Commons is not Facebook.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammadzaidmansoori8 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope?
Trade (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
BECUASE I DONT WANT PEOPLE TO download it SMK.X DJ (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside old promotional user sandbox and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio ©David von Becker M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JackDeWick (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promotional images uploaded by likely company rep, no usage and out of scope
- File:Video conferencing in Just Meet.png
- File:Just Meet android application.jpg
- File:Just Meet logo till may 19.png
- File:Just Meet logo.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, user's self promotional image, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Syntax2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, many promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
- File:Ledifha-screen-logo.png
- File:Ledifha-app.png
- File:Logo ledifha apps.png
- File:Ledifha app.png
- File:Ledifha logo 2020.png
- File:Ledifha.png
- File:1596379721705201 photos v2 x2 1 512x512.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope due to low quality; see Category:Heard Island for better files. Tadarrius Bean (talk) 17:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
becuase i dont like it and i. dont want poeple to use it SMK.X DJ (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per below nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Because I don’t want people to copy me and also my parent does t want any picture on Wikipedia SMK.X G (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
My parent told me to not put pictures in Wikipedia SMK.X G (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:G2: broken redirect. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Miniatura em marfim representando Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza ( A feiticeira de Ilhabela).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Arquivo de mídia sem informações necessárias Alvescorrea Juliana (talk) 02:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Translate: "Media archive without necessary information" --RAN (talk) 05:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Já existe um ficheiro semelhante com o mesmo nome Alvescorrea Juliana (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Cuántas cuentas abriste para huevear con esta bruja portuguesa? Eres su reencarnación? 186.172.10.217 11:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Já existe um arquivo com o mesmo nome na Wikimedia Alvescorrea Juliana (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Alvescorrea Juliana: Please stop re-nominating this file every few days while the deletion request is still open. --Rosenzweig τ 11:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Rosenzweig τ 16:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
AI enhanced version of a historical paiting (File:Giorgio Vasari - Bernardetto de' Medici.jpg) Polarlys (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Per previous nomination this seems to be an AI-upscaled version of File:Giorgio Vasari - Bernardetto de' Medici.jpg - it cites the same source and collection, but is twice the resolution, has brighter colours and appears to have introduced upscaling artefacts, particularly on the fleece of the subject's coat.
An AI-upscaled image is not the faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art that the licence describes. It could be licenced correctly, but seems out of COM:SCOPE with limited educational use beyond showing what it looks like when an AI tries to upscale a painting (and it's not an especially instructive example of that). Belbury (talk) 11:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:INUSE.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)- It was added to the it.wikipedia.org article by an IP within an hour of upload, presumably this was the uploader (who was blocked there a month later for abusing multiple accounts, if I'm reading that right). I've now restored the original to that article so that this AI version is not in use. Belbury (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking care of that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator and their follow up comment. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Please delete this file (G7 - Author requests deletion) or anonoymize the file (delete the comment I added in the initial version). 2001:1C00:E0A:FE00:F50B:61AD:481C:A35 03:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ditto. Osx (talk) 03:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. Is there any problem with the copyright, Osx? Did you shoot the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: File in use and not eligible for G7. I have hidden some early file description history per request. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
As the photographer of this image, I kindly request that it be deleted. If deletion is not possible, please completely anonymize my authorship by removing the "User" and "Comment/yazar" fields from the File History section, the "Author" field from the Summary section, and any other fields that contain my username. Thank you very much. Osx (talk) 11:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
This is not original work. It was posted by the amusement park on social media [3] and is likely subject to copyright. Xenryjake (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
republished without the author's permission. this image is stolen from the MetrouUsor forum, this topic specifically: https://forum.metrouusor.com/ViewTopic?postId=465928&handler=ByPostId TrainSimFan (talk) 07:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This is blatant copyvio. 185.172.241.184 12:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
low quality, also stolen from a recording found from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ifs55nIhpzY TrainSimFan (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete This is a clearly copyvio. Michalg95 (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizardofwords25 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Fake licence. This person is born in 1968, so the photo could not have been published before 1929 Leokand (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Inaccurate vectorization. 207.241.245.200 14:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Presumably File:Nintendo_Logo_1970.png is the source. In which case the problem is the initial bitmap, not the vectorisation. It's poor quality, agreed, and I see no value to having an SVG version of something so poor. But I'm very reluctant to push deletion on quality grounds because that has always been far too subjective and has mostly been used as an excuse for IDONTLIKEIT. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like it's a job for @VulcanSphere: ! Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Vectorization improvement done by VulcanSphere. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep per above. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like it's a job for @VulcanSphere: ! Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded to long ago for courtesy deletion CC are irrevocable, read the fine print. Keep as well as all requests of this use below. --Zenwort (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Too long ago for courtesy deletion, written consent was obtained from subject at time of filming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Trompeten mit Drehventilen in B, C, D, Es, Naturtrompeten und Flügelhorn im Klangvergleich.webm
[edit]Ich habe das Video mit einem Studierenden gemacht, der sein schriftliches Einverständnis gegeben hat. Er möchte, dass es gelöscht wird. Bitte daher einen Admin um Löschung. DrTrumpet (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pouget-Bertsch -1 Trompete in B (Drehventile).webm, file also in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:CSD F10, no use outside userpages and no educational purpose, idk why the tag was removed Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Photo made for a deleted article in Spanish Wikipedia; Not relevant for Commons Alejitao123 (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted advertising by Armando Testa' agency. Not own work 95.251.126.211 18:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted advertising by Armando Testa's agency. Not own work 95.251.126.211 18:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnone9000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional files for non-notable individual; abusing multiple accounts. Only uploaded for use on repeatedly-deleted promotional Wikipedia articles (w:en:FireVerse, w:en:Johnone9000/sandbox, etc.) Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:WIKICIANPEDIA LOGO.png
- File:Chevobeatz & FireVerse Give me the herbs.png
- File:FireVerse In St Mary.png
- File:FireVerse in kingston.png
- File:FireVerse in Jamaica.png
- File:FireVerse Reggae Music Art Cover.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT: advertisement for uploader's apparel business DanielPenfield (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
probably wrong date, wrong author... Xocolatl (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Blank image However, it works fine. I believe they're having an issue on their end. CeltBrowne (talk) 20:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep Sorry, for some reason the image refused to load on one of my devices. It appears as normal on my desktop. Apologies for the inconvenience, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Took from "Defense Express", no evidence of a CC license Avron (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I did not find photo at source link; dubious license claim Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as no permission (No permission since) Krd 03:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded on duma72.ru, the website of the en:Tyumen Oblast Duma. There, it says "Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии Creative Common Attribution 3.0". This means the file is licensed under Creative Common Attribution 3.0. Thus, no permission should be required. D3rT!m (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per User:D3rT!m. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Para hacer una pagina en Wikipedia, lee es:Ayuda:Tu primer artículo. Omphalographer (talk) 04:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Lula assina acordos com o Egito para fortalecer as relações comerciais entre os países.jpg
[edit]
Image from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 are not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Apparently the new Agencia Gov is releasing these images freely, but not so clearly as it should be. "A reprodução é gratuita desde que citada a fonte" Reproduction is free if the source is cited. I think it could be kept. Bedivere (talk) 18:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Bedivere: we can use the {{Attribution}} tag. Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lula assina acordos com o Egito para fortalecer as relações comerciais entre os países.jpg
[edit]
The permission statement says: A reprodução é gratuita desde que citada a fonte.(Reproduction is free provided the source is cited). But it's too vague to be considered valid permission according to COM:L#Acceptable licenses. Checking the "Termos de uso (Terms of Use)" at the bottom, it says,
- b) O Usuário deverá utilizar o Portal apenas para finalidades de uso pessoal, sem intuito comercial ou lucrativo. (The User must use the Portal only for personal use, without commercial or profit-making purposes.)
- ...
- e) Reprodução autorizada mediante indicação da fonte. (Reproduction authorized provided the source is indicated.)
Therefore, the permission is clearly limited to personal and non-commercial use. 0x0a (talk) 07:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - source given is tweet with no evidence of free license Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Brasília, 21-02-2023 O presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva recebe o secretário de Estado dos EUA, Antony Blinken, no Palácio do Planalto.DF Foto Fabio Rodrigues-Pozzebom Agência Brasil.jpg
[edit]
The permission statement says: A reprodução é gratuita desde que citada a fonte.(Reproduction is free provided the source is cited). But it's too vague to be considered valid permission according to COM:L#Acceptable licenses. Checking the "Termos de uso (Terms of Use)" at the bottom, it says, *b) O Usuário deverá utilizar o Portal apenas para finalidades de uso pessoal, sem intuito comercial ou lucrativo. (The User must use the Portal only for personal use, without commercial or profit-making purposes.) *... *e) Reprodução autorizada mediante indicação da fonte. (Reproduction authorized provided the source is indicated.) Therefore, the permission is clearly limited to personal and non-commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Image from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Images from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Image from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Images from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Images from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No real source given. ("Source: personal archieves") Herbert Ortner (talk) 10:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in the picture is still copyrighted. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- For the deleting admin: Artist is Wilhelm Kåge who died 1960. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 07:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also applies to:
- File:Fajans, skål, 1926 - Hallwylska museet - 90518.tif
- File:Fajans, skål, 1925 - Hallwylska museet - 90521.tif
- File:Fajans, skål, 1926 - Hallwylska museet - 90517.tif
- File:Fajans, skål, baksida, 1926 - Hallwylska museet - 90519.tif
- File:Fajans, skål, baksida, 1925 - Hallwylska museet - 90522.tif
- File:Fajans, blomkruka, baksida, 1921 - Hallwylska museet - 90511.tif
- File:Fajans, teburk, 1926 - Hallwylska museet - 90525.tif
- File:Fajans, blomkruka, 1921 - Hallwylska museet - 90510.tif
- File:Fajans, bonbonnière, 1926 - Hallwylska museet - 90514.tif
- File:Fajans, bonbonnière, 1923 - Hallwylska museet - 90512.tif
- File:Fajans, bonbonnière, baksida, 1923 - Hallwylska museet - 90513.tif
- File:Fajans, bonbonnière, baksida, 1926 - Hallwylska museet - 90515.tif
- File:Fajans, teburk, baksida, 1926 - Hallwylska museet - 90526.tif
- File:Fajans, bål med lock på fast fat, baksida, 1760-tal - Hallwylska museet - 90528.tif
- /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 07:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also applies to:
- For the deleting admin: Artist is Wilhelm Kåge who died 1960. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 07:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in the picture is still copyrighted. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, subject died in 1977 so this image could still be copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep License corrected. --RAN (talk) 00:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The so-called corrections are mere assumptions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Likely derivative of a copyrighted work (no info given), also uploaded to disparage the depicted person. — Yerpo Eh? 13:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Flickr - Official U.S. Navy Imagery - An MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter assigned to the Golden Falcons of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 12 delivers cargo.jpg
[edit]_12_delivers_cargo.jpg){kind=link}
_12_delivers_cargo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate with File:US Navy 120213-N-VC888-041 An MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter assigned to the Golden Falcons of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 12 delivers cargo t.jpg. Or can it be redirected? 82.174.61.58 13:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
_12_delivers_cargo_t.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This image has been attempted to be added to en:KRISS KARD several times. It is of poor quality, barely resemblant of the subject, and has been deleted before. Jaffaceksi (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's currently COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as a copy of some amateur art at https://the-harbinger.fandom.com/wiki/Kriss_KARD which doesn't appear to be freely licenced, which has been upscaled by AI with a simple (presumably manual) removal of the magazine. We had the same problem with another blocky image of a gun from this user at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OTs-21.jpg last month, except in that case they were asking Midjourney to work from a photograph. We may need to review this user's uploads. --Belbury (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Belbury. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Own work? 186.174.144.44 16:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: screengrab, judging by bar at bottom. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The toy is obviously being used to demonstrate what is (presumably) a copyrighted character, but doesn't this still fall under Commons:TOY? Ubcule (talk) 19:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unused image I tagged as {{BadPDF}} due to only containing graphic data. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (at least until replaced by a better image). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Photo taken without the consent of the subject and in a private situation. Claim receivef By e-mail to VRTS on fr-WP file #2024031410009585 JohnNewton8 (talk) 21:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, unlikely that the uploader created the poster. I cannot see a free license included in the image, and the text and the included photographs are subject to copyright. This requires permission from the copyright holders. Freedom of panorama does not apply, see COM:FOP UK. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of existing file Scu ba (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
features copyrighted music. and I believe it has not been 70 years since the death of the longest lived author who was a writer who died in 1954. The music should be removed and the film should be deleted for at least 1 more year. SDudley (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Already removed the soundtrack! --Mayimbú (talk) 22:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! SDudley (talk) 03:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete undelete in 2025. Hekerui (talk) 15:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ok,
after being denied a rename of the filei had it tagged with {{PD-US-expired-abroad-delete}}. --Mayimbú (talk) 00:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2025. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Claimed license not supported by source. 1942 might or might not be out of copyright for some reason. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. It's a US Military image (see here on page 44), so public domain (there is also a near duplicate of lower resolution but possibly higher quality on English Wikipedia at en:File:NAFIpitangainPortoAratu.jpg which could potentially be imported to Commons). Finally, if kept, this should be renamed because it appears to be of a seaplane base in Brazil, not in Honduras. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: PD-USGov. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Unknown author from 1940s cannot be assumed to have died more than 70 years ago without information. Source website states all rights reserved. 1942 photo might or might not be out of copyright for some reason. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. There are sources which credit this to the Honduran military (https://www.tunota.com/mundo/latinoamerica/guerra-del-eje-en-honduras-como-estuvo-involucrado-el-pais-en-la-segunda-guerra-mundial-2023-07-22). Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Honduras, a work made for an employer (I would think a photograph by a military member during operations would qualify) has a copyright duration of 75 years after publication. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA applies, undelete in 2038 per rationale by IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Although these banners are sourced to CC-licensed photographs, they’re photographs of murals and there is no no freedom of panorama in the US, meaning copyright belongs to the mural artists, not the photographers.
- File:ISA 2024 campaign header 3.png
File:ISA 2024 campaign header 2.png
OKFile:ISA 2024 campaign header 4.png OK- File:ISA 2024 campaign headers 1.png
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both for the ongoing education. I learn something new each time. I have changed all 4 images marked for deletion to images from Commons and countries with Freedom of Panorama, i.e., Spain, Germany, Canada and Australia. RZadok (talk) 16:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- @RZadok Thank you for your responding so quickly. I know copyright rules get complicated. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- So complicated, but also so great to have people open to explaining the issues. Thanks again. RZadok (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for uploading new versions of these images. The following images look good:
- OK File:ISA 2024 campaign headers 1.png
- OK File:ISA 2024 campaign header 2.png
- The following might still have issues because there does not appear to be freedom of panorama for artistic works in Canada and Australia's FoP rules are murky
- The European Union seems to be more permissive about freedom of panorama (but the UK is not), if you're looking for free images. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- So complicated, but also so great to have people open to explaining the issues. Thanks again. RZadok (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- @RZadok Thank you for your responding so quickly. I know copyright rules get complicated. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Arg. Indeed. I am explaining FOP to Rachel and she will come up with some replacements... Anthere (talk)
So... I am unsure what is now the situation of this last one... File:ISA 2024 campaign header 3.png. Can someone help ? Anthere (talk) 21:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Revdelled three. Australia's one might still present issues but I decided to keep since courts are unclear. Deleted the Canadian one because there is no FOP for 2D graphical works in Canada. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - likely public domain in New Zealand but not in united states according to Commons:Hirtle_chart TheLoyalOrder (talk) 04:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2046. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copvio - obviously stated license is wrong. image is likely public domain new zealand but not united states according to Commons:Hirtle_chart TheLoyalOrder (talk) 04:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the stated license is wrong, but when was this COA created? Abzeronow (talk) 17:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
copvio - this is clearly made with a computer, presumably the person who made it didnt die over 78 years ago (in order to be public domain in NZ and US)? unless theres a source saying Auckland City Council released this under any appropriate license this should be deleted TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: The source https://web.archive.org/web/20140824094020/http://www.civicheraldry.com/page/5335 doesn't have a free license. COA itself is public domain. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - Auckland Regional Authority was formed in 1963 - presumably granted then or after then so not public domain in United States even if public domain in New Zealand Commons:Hirtle_chart TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - Commons:Hirtle chart - granted march 1946, public domain in New Zealand march 1996 - after URAA (1 jan 1996) date so not public domain united states TheLoyalOrder (talk) 06:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, URAA sucks sometimes, a few months off from being PD in the US and months off from being grandfathered (since SCOTUS decision upholding URAA was earlier in 2012). Undelete in 2042. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - Commons:Hirtle chart - granted 1958, public domain in New Zealand 2008 - after URAA date (1996) so not public domain in the US TheLoyalOrder (talk) 06:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Other towns/cities have coat of arms in other parts of New Zealand. Transfer to local wiki into English Wikipedia. TentingZones1 (talk) 04:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: Many pages using this file. This deletion will be longer this time. TentingZones1 (talk) 05:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2054. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - Commons:Hirtle chart - granted 1968, public domain in New Zealand 2018, after URAA date (1996) - not public domain USA - File:Manukau_COA.png is a derivative TheLoyalOrder (talk) 06:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2064. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
This "public domain" midi recording is still a version of a copyrighted song "Heart and Soul", composed by Hoagy Carmichael. July–December 1965 copyright catalog shows a renewal registration (#R366764) of the 1938 song. In other words, the song is still copyrighted until the end of 2033, ninety-five years after its original copyright registration. Let's undelete this file in 2034 then, almost ten years from now. George Ho (talk) 06:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The year of creation of the school emblem cannot be confirmed. If the icon was created in 1969, the copyright should expire in 2020, but the year of creation of the school emblem is not clear yet. If there is no information, the copyright protection year will be recalculated starting from 2024. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 11:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. No evidence of the year of creation of the school emblem and thus the copyright status is unclear. SCP-2000 14:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark of SCP-2000. --Ellywa (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Improper copyright Scu ba (talk) 15:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
![15:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/03/14#c-Scu_ba-20240314150000-File:PMC_"Wagner_Group"_official_flag.png){kind=link}
- Delete: this is an obvious copyvio and could have been speedily deleted. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- How is this a copyright violation? I see it as a legitimate image of history. You can not rewrite history by erasing it. It is much more important to remember history and how we have changed and evolved. In the USA, we have Democrat groups attempting to erase their history by removing and permanently destroying Civil War, specifically Confederate monuments. They are no better than the Taliban destroying Buddhist icons which were once part of the seven wonders of the world. The information and images related to the Wagner Group should be kept. 7139a (talk) 19:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
![21:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/03/14#c-Pi.1415926535-20240610211200-File:PMC_"Wagner_Group"_official_flag.png){kind=link}
Improper copyright Scu ba (talk) 15:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
![15:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/03/14#c-Scu_ba-20240314150000-File:PMC_"Wagner_Group"_commander's_banner.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
![21:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/03/14#c-Pi.1415926535-20240610211200-File:PMC_"Wagner_Group"_commander's_banner.png){kind=link}
Violation of COM:FOP US. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
-20240314181300-File:Statue_of_Amelia_Bedelia_at_the_Manning,_South_Carolina_public_library.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: 1999 statue. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Per COM:Sweden the design of the object is in PD since end of 2021, because a design is protected untill 70 years pma, and the artist died in 1950. @Elinor Rajka: , why do you assume the object is still copyrighted? Ellywa (talk) 18:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Per COM:Sweden the design of the object is in PD since end of 2021, because a design is protected untill 70 years pma, and the artist died in 1950. @Elinor Rajka: , why do you assume the object is still copyrighted? Ellywa (talk) 18:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Adelborg, Louise Natalia Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- see corrected dates of life of author in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fajans, tallrik, 1930 - Hallwylska museet - 90600.tif, not death in 1885 as recorded on file page. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- For the deleting admin: The birth/death dates in the image description are incorrect. The artist Louise Adelborg lived 1885-1971.
- This also applies to:
- /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 07:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 125.230.86.143 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a81dec_6ea0001946fa4222a88b2b2209092aff~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_4227,h_2553,al_c,q_90/%E7%89%B9%E5%8A%9B%E5%B1%8B.jpg%7Csource= HR with EXIF data. Yann (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason. It is difficult to confirm that the website is original source, rather than it was copied from Commons. SCP-2000 15:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This weather radar image contain a photo of the uploader and his logo organization. Pierre cb (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Per Template:PD-NEXRAD, this is in the public domain, so the image is allowed to technically be modified. I’m not saying keep or delete due to the logo, however, I do not think the logo alone is a valid reason for deletion per the radar data being public domain. WeatherWriter (talk) 00:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I dont think it should be deleted. The logo actually may make it better, because it shows where te image comes from. Iamakid836e5 (talk) 00:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- The logo is NOT from NOAA/NWS and the photo in the cercle is promotional. One cannot use a GDFL image to promote oneself in Commons. The only way this image would be acceptable is to update it with the original from NWS and input the source as it is possible to display NEXRAD radar data on copyrighted software. Pierre cb (talk) 03:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Commons had a similar discussion to for the 2022 Andover tornado, which I personally nominated for deletion, where it was found a logo on a public domain image is perfectly acceptable. I’m not vouching for this image, but you haven’t provided a true valid reason for deletion to my mind. WeatherWriter (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- The logo is NOT from NOAA/NWS and the photo in the cercle is promotional. One cannot use a GDFL image to promote oneself in Commons. The only way this image would be acceptable is to update it with the original from NWS and input the source as it is possible to display NEXRAD radar data on copyrighted software. Pierre cb (talk) 03:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: would need a replacement image to be removed, people cannot copyright a PD image by sticking their logo on it; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - Commons:Hirtle chart - granted 1958, public domain in New Zealand 2008, after URAA date (1996) - not public domain USA TheLoyalOrder (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2054. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - Commons:Hirtle_chart - granted 1965 - public domain in New Zealand 2015, after URAA date (1996) - not public domain USA TheLoyalOrder (talk) 06:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2061. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Due to the URAA, this file is unlikely to be free in the US as it would certainly have been copyrighted in Pakistan until at least 2000 (the subject attained the rank illutrated here in 1949, and Pakistani copyright terms are 50 years for government works). There does not seem to be a statement from the Pakistani government that expiry of governmental copyright applies worldwide in the way it exists for, say, British Crown works. The CC license also given on the page is unsubstantiated; The original source given was a third-party website, and there seems to be some apparently inconclusive VRT correspondence in the page history. Felix QW (talk) 11:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The item in this picture is still under copyright. Image uploaded by mistake. Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- For the deleting admin: The artist is Waldemar Lindström (1875-1950). This also applies to:
- /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Per COM:Sweden the design of the object is in PD since end of 2021, because a design is protected untill 70 years pma, and the artist died in 1950. @Elinor Rajka: , why do you assume the object is still copyrighted? Ellywa (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- True my mistake Elinor Rajka (talk) 15:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This image seems to be from present-day Bangladesh rather than from present-day Pakistan, which means that its copyright term is probably 60 years from publication, which happened not before 1964. Regardless, it would be protected in the US due to the URAA until 2060. Felix QW (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Isn't present day Bangladesh past day East Pakistan? 186.173.53.39 17:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, absolutely. But that means that we treat the present-day country Bangladesh rather than Pakistan as its country of origin, and Bangladesh extended non-expired copyright terms to 60 years in 2000. Felix QW (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2060. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fatima Jinnah
[edit]These files are all postwar pictures from Pakistan, whose Pakistani 50 year copyright term expired after the URAA restoration date, January 1996. Therefore, their US copyright has been restored by the URAA and will not expire until 95 years after publication.
- File:Fatima and Dina Jinnah at the funeral of Muhammad Ali Jinnah.jpg
- File:Fatima Jinnah with Muslim League workers.JPG
- File:Muhammad Ali Jinnah with Fatima Jinnah.jpg
- File:Photograph of Fatima Jinnah.jpg
Felix QW (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete from 2043 until 2063. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Der User:BCD hat die Bearbeitung kritisiert Gisbert K (talk) 15:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Comment "User XYZ criticized the editing" in itself isn't a valid reason for deletion. However, I think that the source image File:Sebastian Manz (2).jpg is better than this edit, and it's not in use, so I think we could delete it (let the next admin decide). Gestumblindi (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: I agree with Gestumblindi. It's unused and a bad AI upscale, and the other file is much better. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Der User:Belbury hat die Bearbeitung kritisiert Gisbert K (talk) 15:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment The file is in use in ro:Listă de oameni din statul Georgia (see COM:INUSE), and "user XYZ criticized the editing" isn't a valid reason for deletion. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: the existing use that I see is only on your talk page, and that alone is not a reason to retain. If we are to retain it should be renamed to something relating to what it portrays, not its existing title. I see that there are alternatives in category:Christine King Farris — billinghurst sDrewth 05:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: It was in use in the Romanian Wikipedia article at the time I wrote my comment in March, but has since been replaced - as that Romanian list is generated from Wikidata, I think it was due to this replacement on Wikidata which now uses a cropped version of the image in question here (File:King-Salazar (cropped).jpg). I have no strong opinions on this image(s) and of course would be fine with a better file name; I'm only involved in this at all because Gisbert K contacted me on my discussion page. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: the existing use that I see is only on your talk page, and that alone is not a reason to retain. If we are to retain it should be renamed to something relating to what it portrays, not its existing title. I see that there are alternatives in category:Christine King Farris — billinghurst sDrewth 05:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused, no need for this AI upscale file. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
(unknown) photographer not yet dead for 70 years Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- according to description likely family photo with rights resting with uploader. Fix licence. --Zenwort (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD in Germany, and we cannot accept a CC license in this case. Undelete in 2091. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Immagini messe a disposizione con licenza CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT (English:Images made available under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT license) so it is not freely licensed A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, this falls under the "unless otherwise indicated" of the site's copyright policy. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Immagini messe a disposizione con licenza CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT (English:Images made available under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT license) so it is not freely licensed A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, this falls under the "unless otherwise indicated" of the site's copyright policy. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Retrata duas pessoas que não concederam direito de imagem Steverson Almeida Dultra (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused, consent is required to take a photograph of a person in a public place in Brazil COM:CSCR. Lovely photo though. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Free license at source. Yann (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, there is a free license at source. I don't see a reason not to believe the Youtuber is the copyright holder. Abzeronow (talk) 21:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This image is unlikely to have been first published in Pakistan. It is said to depict a 1955 political summit that took place in the UK and has been credited elsewhere to news agencies such as Associated Press and Keystone-France. In order to be usable on Commons, this image would have to have been "first published" in the US, for which there does not seem to be any evidence. Curiously, ÖNB date the image to 1960 and credit it to Austrian press fotographer Alfred Cermak. Felix QW (talk) 17:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably wrong license, no source. copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The copyright had expired dude to the photography’s age and How long the photographer has been dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo zu P-F (talk • contribs) 12:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: circa 1960s photo, no source so copyright status is unknown. Deleted per COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Broken map. The location of Qulin is not marked on the county map. Kk.urban (talk) 20:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm the second uploader of the image. I don't know anything about Qulin, or Missouri in general. I only fixed a typo in the source that prevented the image from being rendered. But comparing Image:Map_of_Missouri_highlighting_Butler_County.svg and Image:Butler County Missouri Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Qulin Highlighted.svg, I don't think the map is wrong, is it? The cropping could be better, though. The image is quite often used across multiple language wikis. Wouldn't it be better to update the file instead if necessary of deleting it? --2A02:3100:117A:E800:3BF2:C251:1A2F:473E 20:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- You mean you are Revolus? In any case, this map shows Butler County correctly, but it's supposed to show the location of Qulin within Butler County. I don't see much point in have a map that doesn't actually show the city it's supposed to. And I don't know how to create these maps. Kk.urban (talk) 03:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE I'll rename the file to drop Qulin. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation, surely not "own work" as claimed by original uploader. According to en:Melanie Fullerton Photographic content is taken from TV series "To Rome with Love" aired between 1969 and 1971 by CBS. Country of origin: USA. Export image back to EN:WP as "non-free". Archie02 (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
As the last editor but not the original uploader, I would agree with the analysis. I just uncritically cropped the image. -Wvdp (talk) 09:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2067. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as no permission (No permission since) Atsme Talk 📧 22:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, I'm not sure how this discussion was posted here by me ... it's not even Happy Hour. The file is good, I own the copyright, and it is now my intention to release it into the public domain. Please feel free to delete this page. Atsme Talk 📧 23:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: It is now public domain. Atsme Talk 📧 00:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- But did you get permission from the speaker of this line to release it to the public domain? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Creative commons licenses are irrevocable, but a simple line being said is ineligible for copyright, so I think you are good now. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- But did you get permission from the speaker of this line to release it to the public domain? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Implicitly Withdrawn. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: North Korean stamps are copyrighted for 50 years according to COM:DPRK#Stamps, clearly not in public domain as a 2018-issued stamp.
Converting to a DR for easier undeletion, Undelete in 2069. Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
This photo was taken for educational purposes about the human body. However, the model of the photo decided that she no longer wants this photo on the internet. Therefore, I respectfully request the deletion of the photo at the request of the model. Thank you in advance for your understanding! Oddim101119 (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not "mulher jovem" but "young girl", delete immediately! 200.111.17.10 22:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- No valid reason, too late for courtesy request. No identifiable person visible. May be useful for medical site. Keep! --Zenwort (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Even though the person is not identifible, this is unused, and I would be inclined towards granting courtesy deletion here. Weak delete Abzeronow (talk) 00:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Agree with Abzeronow about courtesy deletion at the subject's request; the file is unused and there are many others to illustrate the same thing for educational purpose. Consigned (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Might be OK because this may be public domain, but if not then the claim of "COPYRIGHT © 2011 JUAN MEJÍA https://CREATIVECOMMONS.ORG/LICENSES/BY-NC-ND/3.0/" would mean this should not be on Commons (neither NC nor ND is allowed) and the public domain dedication makes sense only if it is granted by the copyright holder. In short, the permissions here are a mess, and need to be sorted out if this is to be kept. Jmabel ! talk 22:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom unless we receive a date of publication that tells us this is PD. Abzeronow (talk) 00:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Christchurch coat of arms photos
[edit]- File:Chch COA.JPG
- File:Chch COA2.JPG
- File:Chch Coat of arms.jpg
- File:Christchurch COA.png
- File:Christchurch CoA.svg
copyvio - Commons:Hirtle_chart granted 1949 - so public domain in NZ from 1999 which is after the URAA date so its not public domain in the United States --TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The date of 1949 being used as rationale for deletion is incorrect. It is when the CoA was recognised officially by the College of Arms, not its creation. The design itself is older dating to at least 1948 (maybe even earlier) as seen here. Kiwichris (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Would have to be from before 1946 since URAA date is 1/1/1996 TheLoyalOrder (talk) 07:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Remark: How about the age of the decoration around the COA itself, the birds, the kiwi, the helmet. These appear to be fairly recent imho. The shield File:Christchurch coat of arms shield.svg can serve as an excellent replacement on Wikipedia or other projects. Ellywa (talk) 18:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Would have to be from before 1946 since URAA date is 1/1/1996 TheLoyalOrder (talk) 07:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The date of 1949 being used as rationale for deletion is incorrect. It is when the CoA was recognised officially by the College of Arms, not its creation. The design itself is older dating to at least 1948 (maybe even earlier) as seen here. Kiwichris (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and my remark, nobody bothered to comment. Imho the decoration around the COA is copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The thumbnails along with the posts are clearly the focus of the screenshot so i have doubts whether or not it is truly De Minimis Trade (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The thumbnails are low resolution but I'd suggest to blur them or maybe replace them with CCBY images.
- Prototyperspective (talk) 18:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Adding two more--Trade (talk) 01:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, nobody took the trouble to blur the thumbnails which are not free to use. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
