Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/05/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 11th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

war nur ein Test Judith Sturm (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused scrotum, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'm in full agreement for the deletion action to be taken because of the poor quality of the image. CalusUse (talk) 12:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, unused low quality image of very common object; uploader concurs with deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Fourmidable (talk) 08:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Duplication of already deleted file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1 HMK seated Throne Room.jpg. DrKay (talk) 04:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:1 HMK seated Throne Room.jpg. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The false license, this photo was taken from not free source https://www.marica.bg/svqt/istorik-izchisli-ubitite-ot-stalin-sa-10-miliona-dushi FlorianH76 (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plain spam Nolispanmo 11:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 18:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this file was taken by the uploader.
The JPG comment says "myKITT.de". The image itself can be found on https://www.mykitt.de/events_gccdortmund2022.php - direct link. The image contains a clear watermark and the copyright note of the website says "© 2005-2023 Andreas Winkler". There is no indication that the file is or ever was published under a free licence. Other images like File:Helberg.jpg (direct link) seem to be taken from the website as well. Could very well be that not a single image by the uploader is truely freely licenced.
Maybe the uploader @GrandmasterA: can tell use more about this --D-Kuru (talk) 13:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good eye, @D-Kuru: I can clear this up quite easily: myKITT.de is my personal website. I took the photos myself and I gave myself permission to upload my photos here as well. The A in GrandmasterA is for Andreas. You'll also find my nickname on the index page of myKITT.de  ;) GrandmasterA (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GrandmasterA: Thanks for the reply. Can you may send an E-Mail from your website? That way we can add an OTRS ticket (or Commons:Volunteer Response Team as it is now called) to your images to have an extra level of verification. --D-Kuru (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@D-KuruThat's basically no problem. What's the e-mail address? Just a plain e-mail? Or how does it work? BTW, I know the VRT-page and it says, it's not necessary in my case ("The image was first published on my website, or on my own space of a shared website."). I'm also planning to add more photos in the future and to be honest I'd like to have as least work with it as possible. So adding OTRS tickets to photos that don't need it, is actually a little annoying 🙈 GrandmasterA (talk) 07:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GrandmasterA: It's maybe not needed, but it's advisable. My general assumption is that up to 5% of all files on Commons are undetected copyright violations. Currently that would equate to roughly 4,6 Million files. So how would an ordnary user know that you are not just a troll who claims that they own the website while in reality just violates someones copyright. You maybe know who you are, but even for me your entire personality narrows down to a few characters on a screen. There is basically no extra layer of trust for anyone that you are not just an instance of ChatGPT.
The mail adress is: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. You can find a text template here (yes, just plain text is enough). You can send one mail and include a general note that any current file or future upload to your website that is also published on Commons will be affected by the permission mail. I fully understand that you want to have as little work with these as possible. All you would have to do is to add the template {{PermissionTicket}} to the {{Information}} template (that is used anyway) in the section "|Permission=". Since you can copy the same ticket to all your images there is practically no extra work involved since you can copy the text from one image description page to another one.
--D-Kuru (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I just sent an email. GrandmasterA (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS ticket was received --D-Kuru (talk) 21:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo Snowflake91 (talk) 13:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidental creation of a separate file: will be immediately going back and correcting, which will make this a duplicate  — LlywelynII 21:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 13:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam for "roguenation.org".

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why, if the images are useful? Further searches may be necessary to find files the descriptions of which need trimming, but that's a different issue. –LPfi (talk) 08:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep any file that has no copyright issues, as I agree with Jeff G. and Jmabel that these are useful pictures. The one with the demonstrators running away from Egyptian security forces trying to hit them with sticks is exciting and moving. Why would we want to delete that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 KeepI think many of the images themselves are actually rather good and wouldn't advocate deletion. They appear to be a valuable record of political protest, and arguably have legitimate educational purpose. It's mainly the descriptions that are problematic - they fail to actually describe the image and instead contain lengthy political propaganda diatribes and spam links to campaigning websites. Some of the image names are also questionable. There are several others in Category:Demonstrations and protests against the coronation of Charles III and Camilla which contain lengthy antimonarchist polemic. I think the images should be allowed to stand on their own merit and the descriptions rewritten to say as little as possible - the viewer can make up their own mind about what they represent. Can this be done? Cnbrb (talk) 09:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Don't throw the baby with the bathwater. The description should be trimmed, but these are perfectly acceptable for Commons. Yann (talk) 11:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Images of the quality you see when the Associated Press covers a protest. We need more images of news events, and fewer of puppies and cats, and people photographing their own body parts. I agree we don't need a mini Wikipedia article on the history of the conflict with each image. They can just link to the relevant Wikipedia articles/search_terms with structured data. --RAN (talk) 01:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G., LPfi, Ikan Kekek, Cnbrb, Yann, and Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I think there is a clear consensus to keep, but also to make the captions more neutral. I've done several of these, and will do more, but I really don't want to have to go through these singlehandedly. I've started from the bottom of the list above (and picked up one or two others before I got at all systematic about this. Will someone else please help out? This is a large task. - Jmabel ! talk 20:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've done the first 8. So far, it seems like the first or first two sentences may often be sufficient descriptions, so this work might not be that hard if all of us edit a few file descriptions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - I'm glad we've reached an agreement, and it seems the right one. I'll look at adding proper descriptions to the images in the UK coronation category so the images aren't lacking in (sensible) textual explanation. Cnbrb (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Seems a pretty strong consensus (as is the consensus to redo the descriptions). If someone wants to nominate one or more of these for deletion on another basis, feel free. - Jmabel ! talk 00:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harunstalay023 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I propose that these copyrighted files will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{FakeSVG}}, have File:9,10-Phenanthrenedione.svg as ActualSVG (though it would be even better if it had a transparent background) DMacks (talk) 03:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 08:22, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lena Milius died in 1968, so not in the public domain until 1-1-2039. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As I see it, the only thing copyrightable here is the stamp, and that seems to be this 1899 stamp from a designer who died in 1914, so PD-old. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Everything about this post card is PD, except the handwritten text, which was created by a person who died in 1968, but maybe I'm being a little too fastidious here. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A handwritten address is copyrighted? Really? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Nothing copyrightable, to be eligible it has to be creative, original writing. Every person would write the address using the same words and numbers. --RAN (talk) 01:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks for clarifying that. Nomination withdrawn. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich möchte das Foto ersetzen Miosta (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of non-contributor. not in-use.

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: primarily text, looks like a homework assignment Omphalographer (talk) 02:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 186.174.63.5 12:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 15:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: short plain text PDF containing dictionary definition Omphalographer (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text document, appears to be a school assignment Omphalographer (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edmund Dulac died in 1953 and worked in the UK. These were published in the UK by Hodder & Stoughton and will be under copyright in the UK until 1/1/2024. They are PD in the USA.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will they be restored 1/1/2024? --Jonund (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That would be permitted, but someone must do it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:13, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2024. --Rosenzweig τ 15:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Now 2024 in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 03:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

White paper for a non-notable cryptocurrency project Omphalographer (talk) 17:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 15:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

White paper for a non-notable cryptocurrency token Omphalographer (talk) 17:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 15:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content Omphalographer (talk) 18:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content, probably intended to be a Wikipedia article Omphalographer (talk) 18:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content Omphalographer (talk) 19:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:ECTFE.svg. Leyo 15:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Beast 186.174.85.220 18:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

photo of non-contributor.  Delete ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been placed on the Internet without the consent of the author 2A02:A453:2FB7:1:35F2:71B9:805:889C 18:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I the uploader, want it removed Pocelesukvale (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded 1 year ago.  Delete by courtesy. --Achim55 (talk) 17:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was taken from the home page of the artist: https://sibylheijnen.com/ Vera (talk) 20:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is identical to the SVG of the same name, and was published two months after the SVG was published. This PNG is redundant, and used on any pages anyway. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 03:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a stock photo originally uploaded to iStock in June 2022. The Flickr user may be an iStock contributor and has uploaded other freely licensed photos, but as far as I can tell, this is the only drone photo and everything else is on iPhone. I have doubts that this is the Flickr user's work.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator, and also the EXIF data of the drone photograph. 119.18.1.125 19:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN2 Book TV. Uses PD license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original interview programming. Uses PD license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original interview programming. Claimed FCC PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original interview programming. Claimed FCC PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original interview programming. Claimed CC license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original interview programming. Claimed license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of events beyond congressional chambers. Uses PD license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. See https://www.c-span.org/person/?50431/DonaldDiFrancesco and https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of events beyond congressional chambers. Uses PD license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. See https://www.c-span.org/person/?50431/DonaldDiFrancesco and https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 13:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I guess you should delete it. JByrne404 (talk) 17:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN interview. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original interview. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original interview. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). However, there is a permission declaration (in German) in the file description. We might need to get the permission confirmed, but that is in no way a reason for speedy deletion. LPfi (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And where exactly is the sense of changing a no permission tagging which will be processed after 7 days to a deletion request that can be closed also after 7 days? --Didym (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A deletion request gets more eyes on it, and a sensible admin will not delete a file after 7 days when the existence of a permission statement is clearly noted. For the "no permission since" there is no such comment (other than in the file description) and I fear there are admins who will delete these on a routine basis after the 7 days. No one feels a deletion request needs to be closed after those 7 days, I hope. Moreover, in a deletion request the files can be handled collectively. –LPfi (talk) 19:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

LPfi (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission and unlikely to be able to obtain permission (uploader has not edited in a year). If permission can be recieved, the files can of course be undeleted. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. LPfi (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deutscher-soldatenfriedhof-rovaniemi-norvajärvi-finnland-eingangsturm-vorhalle.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT Emu (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT Emu (talk) 19:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Logo is outdated. as you can see on the homepage www.kinderhospiz.de there is a new logo. therefore please delete the old logo from commons as well as from the article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinder-_und_Jugendhospiz_Balthasar Ras67 (talk) 22:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (from Pixabay) Culex (talk) 22:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC0. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (from Adobe stock) Culex (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 23:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 16:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All rights reserved on Flickr. Probably {{PD-textlogo}} in U.S., thoughts on Bangladesh? If deleting, please move to enwiki as {{PD-ineligible-USonly|Bangladesh}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree this fits with Template:PD-ineligible-USonly. Thanks Hekerui (talk) 11:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; COM:BANGLADESH lacks info on TOO so we cannot assume US type TOO applies. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two types of images in this user's uploads:

These are all out of scope, copyright violations, and/or both.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art of copyrighted characters, obviously a violation of COM:FANART. The original art might also be copyrighted, but I am unsure if the user is the same as the creator of the fan art.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wertyuiop1asdqws (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of com:PS + probably a collage of non-free images.

Hanooz 01:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YaskABo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of com:PS

Hanooz 01:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's a striking portrait, though. The man appears to be leaning in somewhat aggressively. Of course the photo should be deleted if there's a copyright issue. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 22spears (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The text underneath the image is well-over COM:TOO USA, and no evidence exists that the text was released by the copyright holder under a suitable free license. The text is also not de minimis, as the central point of this image was to capture the entire Tumblr post including the text explaining the meaning of the pro-(ephebo)pedophile flag that the copyright holder labels as the so-called "Minor-attracted person" flag. As such, this either would either need to be cropped to remove the text, or outright deleted as a copyright violation. Because other copies of the flag exist on Commons (such as File:Stenna's MAP Flag.svg, and there therefore is no need to create a duplicate, this should simply be deleted as such.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The flag is below TOO, but the text is not. SWinxy (talk) 03:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. May have been intended as a guide for a video game, but is incomprehensible (possibly as a result of mistranslation). Omphalographer (talk) 03:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, don't know whether this is uploader's own work or not A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted object A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted object A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not contain a license Dr.Abellah alghalib (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   21:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake picture no license Dr.Abellah alghalib (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty image Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 20:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just bad quality. Almost any informations aren't visible... Nouill (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original source of the image is https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2009/may/06/short-story-jane-bowles. No indication that the image is in the public domain. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality and unused file superseded by File:Reagan with horse.jpg. Wow (talk) 01:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Ikan Kekek. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep most of our ejaculation gifs are men jerking off. This actually shows the muscle contractions unobstructed Dronebogus (talk) 23:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment IMO File:40 year old male orgasm.gif also shows the muscle contractions, and that one had a better quality. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That’s the same file 🙃 Dronebogus (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should be File:Ejaculation showing contractions of bulbospongiosus muscle.gif sorry. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and discussion, there is a better gif already. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy violation, originally used here: https://jan-kuerschner.de/ Alabasterstein (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Child pornography? 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 10:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Com:Nudity. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie self promotion Headlock0225 (talk) 20:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work scope 186.173.171.138 21:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, uncat since 2018; no evident usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article J0s3l1t0 (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not a selfie (not that there's anything wrong with selfies), and a pretty good picture of 4 children, including one in a Superman uniform, and the one furthest to the viewer's left must be wearing some kind of costume, too. A personality rights warning should be added, but I would keep it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete From left to right, the three boys are wearing Iron Man, Superman, and Deadpool costumes - and the IP rights associated with those characters sharply limit the potential use of this photo. Unless you can describe a specific use case for this photo, I can't see any reason to keep it. Omphalographer (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • See COM:COSPLAY. Would you reconsider your vote on that basis, Omphalographer? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not convinced. This photo doesn't hit any of the "widely agreed upon points" on that list besides being a freely licensed photo - the costumes are store-bought, not original; they depict modern versions of characters which certainly aren't in the public domain; the designs are screen printed onto the costumes, so there's no utilitarian aspect to them; and the costumes are the primary focus of the photo. Omphalographer (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is my own creation, but has some mistakes, now i have uploaded a corrected version: Liniennetz Projekt S-Bahn Kiel.png OceansTwo (talk) 21:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Okutu Sirkeep (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 08:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://medium.com/illumination-curated/no-time-to-read-atomic-habits-first-try-reframing-that-question-edc2466e02a6 Culex (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really? Come on, have a REAL source. Published first when? Was this even first published in Ukraine at all? 68.134.5.142 23:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; lacking information needed to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SAIKIA ANJAN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

PDF files containing textual descriptions of journals, but no content.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file - it is the Airfield at Council Bluffs Iowa so the name of the file is incorrect. I can up load the file with the correct name after it is deleted. Sorry. Thank you. Richard N Horne Richard N Horne (talk) 00:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: renamed, not a deletion issue. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Marbletan as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 14:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong author, copyright violation? see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use Drakosh (talk) 19:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and very low resolution; many far better photos now MPF (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, get rid of it. JerryFriedman (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader consents. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was published (or at least created) in 1930. It was created anonymously, so EU copyright expired on 2001. But that's past the URAA date, so URAA applies. I highly doubt this was simultaneously published in the US either. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

meaningless low quality photo Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 20:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear use case, promotional Emu (talk) 20:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soy la autora quiero retirar esta foto. Marinna (talk) 20:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Approved quality image, one of only 2 photos we have of notable person with articles about them in Wikipedias in 8 languages. Uploader request too late for no reason automatic deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (foto by Rainer Haeckl) M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality photograph of an unidentified person, not useful for educational purposes. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 20:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unused personal photo uploaded 3 years ago by user with no other contributions. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member permission, have yet to receive an email from mindef. Thus might not under {mindef} permission. My mistake, Better to be deleted than include Kaliper1 (talk) 00:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:PS Hanooz 01:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Polarlys as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo.  Keep: Not own work, but I think this is {{PD-textlogo}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: consensus for PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal text documents

Omphalographer (talk) 03:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong info and title Bigs7 (talk) 04:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marko R (talk · contribs)

[edit]

hoax/personal files/no use (no results for "Fuxos Assistant")

Nutshinou Talk! 07:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Twitter references doesn't appear to state that it has been released under the stated license Tournesol (talk) 08:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text that reads "Hip-Hop", not useful, not used Nutshinou Talk! 08:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amir Ali 186.174.130.92 12:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purposes. Used in a hoax article on enwiki. Anarchyte (talk) 12:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Qué significa Penjo? 186.174.63.5 12:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9   15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Engineer 186.174.63.5 12:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9   15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality and blurred image obscured by fencing Jokulhlaup (talk) 14:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9   15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asmit sarkar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope (bad quality)/copyright issues

Юрий Д.К 16:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly doctored/manipulated version of File:Geri Halliwell at Goodwood 2014 001.jpg Breaktheicees (talk) 19:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Agree with assessment as poorly photoshopped, but in use in article space. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly doctored version of File:Geri Halliwell at Goodwood 2014 001.jpg; no longer in use in article space Breaktheicees (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic use. Nthep (talk) 16:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unexplained artwork, No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 16:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of group of people without identity. Without further information it is of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 16:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and not own work. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, see TinEye [4] Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - protected image see https://www.ravenartwork.com/ Hoyanova (talk) 09:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Laddzhao as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Personal privacy image, requesting deletion
Converted to regular DR to allwo for discussion, as image was uploaded in 2021 and nominator provided no clue why "personal privacy" should be an issue here. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I regret uploading my personal privacy image now. Because there is our location information in my direction, which is my privacy Laddzhao (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But the image-file has no GPS-data. --Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope, and no personal info shown. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly is not a selfie, the image subject can't be the author. --2003:C0:8F49:DE00:4C63:18F9:B7A0:1C6 10:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no free license at source. --P 1 9 9   15:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Satellite Image uploaded by a person who had uploaded dozens of stolen images abusing multiple accounts. However, I don't know what kind of copyright protection might this image have (of course, it's not an own work). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, need original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here a week before upload https://www.facebook.com/zhikaustralia/photos/a.450180759373/10159299263289374/?paipv=0&eav=AfbfvNgMLuJChSte3f9bzjOPSWyI2U8X9pfn1_0Myk7iFq98fO6T4BMo5-5xJS3a_wo - no meaningful exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found online for sale here - https://onlinestores.factorysale2023.com/category?name=alex%20thomsom - and google finds it all over the place. Unlikely to be own work as claimed, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

credited to pkc media in exif and here - https://www.instagram.com/p/CrOOtGgt-BP/ - not own work. User has a history of copyvio. Needs OTRS to keep Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available for sale here https://www.olo-99.top/ProductDetail.aspx?iid=67541620&pr=50.88 and widely found on the web. No exif either. unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New user; this is their first upload. Claimed to be an "own work" but it does come from Twitter. It is, of course, possible that the tweeter is also the uploader but I consider that unlikely. I've asked the user about it but they are offline; email is not enabled. Deletion is the safe way forward. Schwede66 11:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Likely taken from Google per filename. --P 1 9 9   15:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El texto es de Blogspot. La foto, no sé. 186.174.149.29 13:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says that the author (which is not the uploader agreed that the photo may be used, but there is no evidence of such thing, and anyway the license of use is unknown. Being so, I have serious doubts that the photo may be kept in Commons. Stego (talk) 13:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT from photographer. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images are copyrighted by their respective copyright owners. Yann (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

En Luanda se habla portugués? 186.174.42.204 14:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not look like an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and unusable tiny thumbnail. --P 1 9 9   15:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is the crest of a GAA football club in Ireland. The site it comes from is copyrighted, I doubt this file has a copyleft license as stated. http://www.aodhruadh.org/ -- Deadstar (msg) 16:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate of File:Stryi,Great synagogue.jpg Hofoen (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soy el propietario de tal imagen. Corsario CL (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weon. 186.174.126.240 23:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   15:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isashiman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

photo of non contributors, or low resolution+no metadata/we cant undestand it is free licensed and own work. should be deleted.

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per file-name likely not own work, but obtained via What's Up from another person. In addition, highly suspicious of an attack-image, per [5]. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is a screenshot as indicated in metadata : without the source, there is no evidence of free licence. - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 20:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.6.11 22:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Theoalexa2020

[edit]

Published online in full resolutions a few days prior to the upload on Commons. This makes the uploader's ownership claim dubious. --Gyrostat (talk) 22:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Didn't see there was another, exact same version with transparency (File:City-Carre-Magdeburg-Logo.png). Welkend (talk) 22:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of magazine cover, not old enough to be PD in source country, COM:DW Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not a 2023 photo, I question that the authorship and license claims are accurate -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   15:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sicem6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Mix of cameras and some credited to Thomas Reynolds in exif. Needs OTRS to keep IMO

Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing "Dubious" about these pictures... They were all taken at different times at different locations.
I am his son and in many of these pictures other family is present as well including my son, Allen's grandson.
All of the pictures (except maybe one) were taken with my camera(s) at Alumni games and Alumni dinners where I was present with my father.
This also includes his presentation of the NFL's 50 year gold football to the high school in Winchester KS where he went to school. Sicem6 (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ownership remains with the photographer - for example Thomas Reynolds - and they would need to provide written permission via OTRS. If you took them yourself you can confirm that via OTRS too Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I am Thomas Reynolds... Can I just write it on a piece of paper and upload that? I am a bit baffled by this...
What is OTRS? Sicem6 (talk) 18:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My first reply was missing some info... Not sure if it helps but I would think it would...
Here is at least one of the pictures in question on my Flickr page. Renamed so you would know it is me...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sicem/24260670763 Sicem6 (talk) 18:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: While VRT is typically how permission is established, the user has demonstrated control over the longtime flickr account bearing that name, so we have evidence of permission here. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Syunsyunminmin as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
It should be "No FoP in Kazakhstan"; see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Kazakhstan. Also applies to:

We've to evaluate if the statues are recent and/or de minimis. Thanks Ruthven (msg) 12:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; no commercial FOP in Kazakhstan; sculptures appear copyrighted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Technical scheme of the Kokshetau Airport. Not an own work and probably does not fit to PD-KZ-exempt. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files created by Ziya Koseoglu-CHP

[edit]

In metadata of many images: stated that created by Ziya Köseoğlu

When I controlled Flickr account of Ziya Köseoğlu, I found some images in above are copyrighted and others are not published on him personal account. But VOA Turkish stated the copyright holder as CHP (VOA). In short, VOA took these images from CHP’s photographers, made attribution for CHP and these aren’t work of VOA Turkish. So these copyrighted files will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 14:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment still pictures left https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Kemal_K%C4%B1l%C4%B1%C3%A7daro%C4%9Flu Shadow4dark (talk) 06:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyright violation; the YT account used as a source has been terminated; impossible to confirm this material was bona fide Creative Commons license Bri (talk) 14:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran, de minimis does not apply. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source video is not licensed under Creative Commons. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; screenshot of a non-free work. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poli.Pav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The claim that each of these works is anonymous is absurd. In every case, the author and engraver are named on the title page. The title page for every work in this list is part of the list. In every case, the engraver died less than 70 years ago. These are all works published by Golden Cockerel Press in the UK.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite

[edit]

I've not looked at the other files, but this one (a title-page - not, strictly speaking, a Severin plate) might be allowed to remain on Commons, on the grounds that the Golden Cockerell Press issued it, in identical size, quality, colouring, as one side of a two-sided 'Prospectus' (flyer) for the upcoming book. Indeed the scan here may be of the flyer rather than from the actual book, as it appears to have a fold. It seems over-zealous to repress what a long-defunct publisher freely issued as an advert for their book. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.39.159.73 (talk) 09:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Undelete in 1994 +70 years. --Enyavar (talk) 18:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and comment; UK copyright subsists for 70 years post-death. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Circa 1960s photograph. Too young to be public domain in Ukraine. Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy licence — danyele 18:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; URAA issue with the photo. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cut-out from a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy licence — danyele 18:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Public domain in Italy, but the license tag notes that it's probably not in the public domain in the USA if published after 1976. This is a crop of an image first published in 1982, so we can't host this in the USA. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1969 American photograph. Source says "copyright not evaluated". Author is still living and if this was unpublished until it was uploaded by the Durham County Library, it would not be public domain for some time. VRT permission from Bill Boyarsky may be needed. Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:58, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Circa 1960s Russian photograph. Would be too young to be public domain in Russia. Abzeronow (talk) 16:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Licensing states that media exclusively licensed for non-commercial purposes is not accepted on Commons. So I don't think we can have a license template that says the media can only be used "for non-profit purposes". The editor who created the template has only a couple hundred edits. 25stargeneral (talk) 22:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been sourced from a UK university website which has a CC-BY-NC (non-commercial) license, which is not permitted on Commons per Commons:Licensing#Forbidden licenses. Uploader's claimed license of CC-BY-SA is incorrect. Muzilon (talk) 01:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likely {{PD-UK-anon}}, if published at the time it was taken, or {{PD-UK-gov}} if taken as part of the phtographer's military duties. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C2141221 "Informal outdoor group portrait of members of 460 Squadron RAAF at RAF Station Binbrook, England. ..." which says
Copyright
Item copyright: Copyright expired - public domain Public Domain
Description
Informal outdoor group portrait of members of 460 Squadron RAAF at RAF Station Binbrook, England. In this group are Flying Officer Strachan (position unknown) and Flight Lieutenant (Flt Lt) Leonard W Dorricott (standing left) DFM, RAF. Flt Lt Dorricott enlisted at 17 and trained as a navigator in Canada and Miami before he was assigned to 460 Squadron RAAF. He was one of several crew who flew in the Avro Lancaster Mk I Bomber "G for George" (W4783). Flt Lt Dorricott was awarded the Distinguished Flying Medal on 10 December 1943, and went on to complete thirty sorties with 460 Squadron.
It has more information than our File: page, but it does not give explicit copyright information. Not clear whether the photographer was doing his official duties; a friend could have taken the photo.
en:No. 460 Squadron RAAF
Glrx (talk) 15:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please delete this image. When I uploaded it I made many mistakes when inputting information. I am reuploadng the same photograph with the correct information and license. --The History Wizard of Cambridge (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion by request from Maxjenny Forslund to News Öresund/Johan Wessman and forwarded to me by mail. Image deleted from Flickr.

See also File:Oresundsting Maxjenny Forslund 20131024 020.jpg Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 06:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose One of here for more than 8 years, and in use. So I oppose until we have a better replacement. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann. --Krd 04:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion requested by Maxjenny Forslund to me, also covering File:Oresundsting Maxjenny Forslund 20131024 020.jpg. Reopening as a replacement is available now. Thanks in advance. / Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as it has historical and documentary value. Matlin (talk) 10:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Yes, and having only 3 photos of a person who's the subject of a Wikipedia article is hardly overwhelming. I might be happier about the possibility of a courtesy deletion if we had more photos of her. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Consensus remains to keep. --Stifle (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is my personal copyrighted property uploaded without permission or consent. 2600:4040:5091:BA00:E046:92EA:C72C:CF32 01:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not my choice of picture, and I want to get rid of it from this page. HM Taivas (talk) 11:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HM Taivas We normally do not delete photos that are in use at the request of the person in them unless there is another photo to replace it. Is there another headshot photo you can freely license that you would prefer? If so, please send it to photosubmission@wikimedia.org with a release generated by this tool and reply here that you have done so. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 20:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ulricus Angelus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these are recent enough -- 1930s -- so that they could not have been PD on the URAA date. They therefore have US copyrights for at least several more years.

None of them are {{Own}} as claimed. If Ulricus Angelus- continues to make false claims, they may be blocked from editing here.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

De acuerdo con los demás fotos. Excepción: la primera foto es de los años 1910-1920. Ulricus Angelus (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See notes above for resolutions. holly {chat} 20:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite a simple design, but not own work. Is this simple enough for PD-ineligible? Yann (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused duplicate of File:Trio-Stempel crop.jpg. holly {chat} 20:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright at source, no evidence of free license. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copyright-free image since it is an information (mascot character) in the Aichi Prefectural Police's official government website and other Aichi Police's vehicles are freely available to download at https://www.pref.aichi.jp/police/syokai/kids/download/ Candleblox (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Candleblox That is not how copyright works, please see COM:NETCOPYRIGHT ("The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here.") And mascot characters can absolutely be copyrighted. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, this is a image made on a government website as Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use states. Candleblox (talk) 17:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Candleblox Where on the website does it say that the Standard Terms of Use apply? All I see is [6], which translates (via Google) to "Photographs, illustrations, images, texts, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "contents") posted on this site are subject to copyright protection and are protected by international treaties, copyright laws, etc. All rights to the content belong to the Aichi Prefectural Police or the original author, and the content may not be reproduced or quoted without permission, except in specific cases permitted by copyright law, such as "reproduction for private use" or "quotation." you can't."; it does not say that this site has the Standard Terms of Use. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The correct translation says that it could be used as a citation/quote (愛知県警察又は原著作者に帰属し、「私的使用のための複製」や「引用」など著作権法上認められた特定の場合を除き), so I personally think that applies here since Google Translate is unfortunately not that accurate. Candleblox (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Aichi Prefectural Police is not part of the Japanese national government. holly {chat} 20:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1952 printed photograph, probably from the UK. Flickr source says "all rights reserved" but that may be copyfraud. Uploader would need to show that the photographer cannot be found by a reasonable inquiry. Photograph also would have had its copyright restored by URAA since 1952 is after 1925. Abzeronow (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No reason to think this was published first in Sweden. holly {chat} 20:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Laddzhao as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Personal privacy image, requesting deletion. Ineligible for G7, but not in use;  Delete. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I'd like to know what building that's a photo of and whether we have other photos of that building before supporting a courtesy deletion of this photo on grounds of privacy that the user seems to refuse to explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I regret uploading my personal privacy image now. Because there is our location information in my direction, which is my privacy Laddzhao (talk) 05:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, wrong author and source Xocolatl (talk) 19:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Here is a novel idea, how about you fix the noob upload errors, instead of just nominating them for deletion? An image from 1914 is PD in the USA and the UK. --RAN (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Digital Age
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, passed on October 1998, has very much changed the realities of copyright protection. In a nutshell, this Act of Congress extended all current copyrights (at the time the bill was signed), for another 20 years, thus putting a freeze on all photographic material that was published after January 1,1923. Any photograph that was published before 1923 would have entered the public domain (via the 75 year rule) before the 1998 law was passed, so the time extension does not apply to these photographs. Salonimer (talk) 14:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to delete, that is fine with me. I had recently purchased this picture from an ebay source and thought it would be a good edition to the Wiki file. No intrusion intended. Salonimer (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 20:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es handelt sich um ein Logo. Es ist mit einer fehlerhaften CC-Lizenz hochgeladen worden und gehört nach Wikipedia Mario du (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed CC0 license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed CC0 license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted still from CSPAN original filming of private events beyond congressional chambers. Claimed C-SPAN PD license is incorrect. https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ William Graham (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:安全天

[edit]

Four files uploaded as part of several batches of national anthem uploads, mostly from a series by the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra (copyrighted). 11 files are already tagged for speedy deletion but I couldn’t find a source for the four above. They are tagged "Own work" like the others, which I find doubtful. Dogfennydd (talk) 20:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Descriptions of these four files were updated by uploader (deleting the deletion request notice, which I have restored). All of the above were linked to Youtube videos of the same works, none of which have any copyright information on them. The video linked from File:First French Empire instrumental.ogg File:Trienio Liberal (1820–1823).ogg appears to be of a different recording, though the other three are of the same recording. Uploader claims that these are PD because of the composition date, though ignores potential copyright in the sound recording. Dogfennydd (talk) 09:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this was first published in Ukraine or over 70 years ago. 68.134.5.142 23:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep books "Encyclopedia of the History of Ukraine" for Institute of the History of Ukraine publication on CC BY-SA --白猫shiro nekoОбг. 20:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 21:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, taken from http://www.armitchellmuseum.com/arthur-roy-mitchell-biography.html. Might be {{PD-US-not renewed}} or {{PD-US-no notice}}. MKFI (talk) 06:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andrei Romanenko? 186.172.80.56 07:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A szobor alkotója Domonkos Béla ([10]), aki 2020-ban hunyt el (https://ezalenyeg.hu/bulvar/86-eves-koraban-elhunyt-domonkos-bela-szobraszmuvesz-2125]), így a nem szabadban kiállított szobrairól ([11]) készült képek engedélykötelesek a szobrász jogutódjától. Annak hiányában a fájl  Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:FOP Hungary says "if a fine art, architectural or applied art creation is erected with a permanent character outdoors in a public place, a view of it may be made and used without the authorization of the author and paying remuneration to him". holly {chat} 20:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As Holly says, covered by FOP in Hungary. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A szobor alkotója Domonkos Béla ([12]), aki 2020-ban hunyt el (https://ezalenyeg.hu/bulvar/86-eves-koraban-elhunyt-domonkos-bela-szobraszmuvesz-2125]), így a nem szabadban kiállított szobrairól ([13]) készült képek engedélykötelesek a szobrász jogutódjától. Annak hiányában a fájl  Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:FOP Hungary says "if a fine art, architectural or applied art creation is erected with a permanent character outdoors in a public place, a view of it may be made and used without the authorization of the author and paying remuneration to him". holly {chat} 20:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As Holly says, covered by FOP in Hungary. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A szobor alkotója Domonkos Béla ([14]), aki 2020-ban hunyt el (https://ezalenyeg.hu/bulvar/86-eves-koraban-elhunyt-domonkos-bela-szobraszmuvesz-2125]), így a nem szabadban kiállított szobrairól ([15]) készült képek engedélykötelesek a szobrász jogutódjától. Annak hiányában a fájl  Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:FOP Hungary says "if a fine art, architectural or applied art creation is erected with a permanent character outdoors in a public place, a view of it may be made and used without the authorization of the author and paying remuneration to him". holly {chat} 20:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As Holly says, covered by FOP in Hungary. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be "own work" but this is a photo of a photo. Uploader may have created this image, but probably did not create the original. It's possible the original may be a work of the US Navy, but without a source, we can't verify. Recommend replacement with File:Joan Merriam Smith with her plane.jpg, which is better quality anyway. holly {chat} 17:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. Replaced usage with the file Holly recommended. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closed requests
=== Files in Category:Gbcopyvios ===
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios

Flickrwashing. O followers, 0 following, single use flickr account

Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Gbcopyvios SB19

The photo passed the automatic Flickr review, but descriptions state: "Photos are strictly not for commercial purposes. © All Rights Reserved." or © 2021 ShowBT Philippines. All Rights Reserved.

I don't think these are freely licensed and in fact I think this account is probably flickrwashing as most of the photos seem to be credited to ShowBT

Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files in from 185867096@N02

Suspected flickrwashing. The one image has been deleted from Flickr and the other says Copyright holder Andrew Mason in the exif. Account has 1 follower, 0 following. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios musiccomposer77

All supplied by Duagherty. All need OTRS. Other uploads of this user have been deleted as copyvios

Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios Flickrwashing

Flickrwashing, new account that only has these 6 photos, most of which have FB MD

Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios D1

2 different uploaders claiming the same file as own work. We need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios D2

The same as his FB profile pic https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=352433473550220&set=a.352433446883556 which if you look carefully is a screenshot (bottom left) of something. Needs OTRS - File:Screenshot of candidate infobox on Chrome mobile.jpg also needs to be deleted if these files are deleted

Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
4 Files in Category:Gbcopyvios

FB screenshots - clearly the Joe Biden photo is not own work. All need OTRS to keep

Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbcopyvios 0824a

[edit]

Most of these credited to Niger Delta Insider Facebook Page and claimed as CC0 - no exif, PCP. Not own work unlike other works by this user

Gbawden (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Gbcopyvios 0824b

[edit]

The inaturalist link says CC BY NC which is not compatible with commons

Gbawden (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing - account only has photos of Potkar and claims to belong to her

Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copied from the Flickr channel of the subject, but clearly not their own photo's, permission of photographers is missing, so high possibilty of copyright violation, and deleted per com:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.6.11 22:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know what the ToO is like for Egypt? Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Per nomination. COM:Egypt does not specify a level of originality. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image is showing a creativity of the designer - all color shades are carefully selected - and it is therefore copyrighted. The image has to be deleted as a consequence. --Ellywa (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]