Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/05/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_focus_stacking-20230410-RM-123652.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![93 File:Robert Redford as Bill McKay in "The Candidate" (1972).webp](#File:Robert_Redford_as_Bill_McKay_in_"The_Candidate"_(1972).webp){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_на_чёрном_поле.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
@792M@TKL.jpg){kind=link}
_Genital_atrium_and_penis(Bouguerche,_Gey,_Tazerouti_&_Justine).png){kind=link}
parce qu'une mention de copyright y figure. Zinzolinette (talk) 03:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
If source is Getty Images as stated by uploader, then almost certainly not freely licensed. Muzilon (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy. Copyright violation: This image has been released by the Buckingham Palace and taken by photo Chris Jackson through Getty [1][2]. No indication of release under free licence, and very unlikely that Getty would do so. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Stolen from Instagram Veracious (talk) 03:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Stolen from Instagram Veracious (talk) 03:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Improperly licensed, not a selfie 331dot (talk) 10:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope not webhost. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
_focus_stacking-20230410-RM-123652.jpg){kind=link}
_focus_stacking-20230410-RM-123652.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
[[File:Purpurrote Taubnessel (Lamium purpureum) focus stacking-20230410-RM-123652.jpg|thumb|Purple deadnettle (Lamium purpureum) in a garden in Bamberg, Germany. Focus stack of 20 frames.]] Tylercrawford1 (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Test or vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
Achim55 (talk) 21:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of existing File:2018 European Athletics Championships Day 7 (29).jpg Track1News (talk) 01:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted and redirected by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
I Created another version where the file is more clear Despechi.ro (talk) 09:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
My own mistake, I uploaded it twice, this is a duplicate of File:Plaza de olivos 1931.jpg. – Fma12 (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Author is Jose Jimenez per EXIF data, not the same as the uploader, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
upload went wrong Elekes Andor (talk) 12:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
ERROR in UPLOAD ǃǃ Seeː https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Elekes_Andor&ilshowall=1 Elekes Andor (talk) 04:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Farmhomefarmhouse (talk) 14:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
i don't need this anymore Sabazafarii (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
i don't need this anymore Sabazafarii (talk) 17:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
i dont need this anymore Sabazafarii (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
i dont want this anymore Sabazafarii (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
i dont need this anymore Sabazafarii (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
its wrecked Sabazafarii (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
No es la versión final Malilibu (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Description said a Japanese boy (14 year old) penis, if it is true than that is child pornography A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please report the uploader. We can't tolerate this kind of evil - yes, evil. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Done. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
テスト用の画像のため Aki0313 (talk) 10:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
テスト用の画像のため Aki0313 (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Random penis photo, poor lighting, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete exhibitionism Dronebogus (talk) 05:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 09:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio de F1 186.173.19.112 21:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by CptViraj. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Every single file seems to be advertising of non-notable people or, at best, copyright violation.
- File:Thanh Cong Tran 2.jpg
- File:Thanh Cong Tran 1.jpg
- File:Thanh Cong Tran.jpg
- File:Jose Delio Ares.jpg
- File:Jose delio.jpg
- File:John Babikian.jpg
- File:Sachin Parate (4).jpg
- File:Sachin Parate.jpg
- File:Sachin Parate (3).jpg
- File:Sachin Parate (5).jpg
- File:Sachin Parate (2).jpg
- File:Janette buitenkamp.jpg
- File:Codex Cloud.png - not a person
- File:Codex Cloud (2).png - not a person
- File:Codex Cloud (3).png - not a person
- File:Jake Claver.jpg
- File:Darrin Gray.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 02:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, COM:ADVERT Ameisenigel (talk) 07:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, COM:ADVERT Ameisenigel (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, COM:ADVERT Ameisenigel (talk) 07:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 07:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, COM:ADVERT Ameisenigel (talk) 07:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 07:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
テスト用の画像ファイの為 Aki0313 (talk) 10:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
テスト用画像のため 159.28.68.18 04:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Circa late 1940s or early 1950s photograph. It could be public domain, but would need to know when and where this was published to be sure. Abzeronow (talk) 16:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Trabajo ajeno 186.173.206.133 10:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. --Wutsje 00:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the Royal Family A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fourmidable (talk) 08:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete Duplication of already deleted file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1 HMK seated Throne Room.jpg which is fully under Crown copyright. Cakelot1 (talk) 18:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:King Charles III Coronation Portrait (2023).jpg Cakelot1 (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)- Speedy delete Duplication of already deleted file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1 HMK seated Throne Room.jpg. DrKay (talk) 04:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as no permission (No permission since) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Per source (and the HTML article page), this is licensed under CC-BY 4.0. PDF source says: "Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0"; HTML article says: "This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [...]". Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Withdrawn My bad - I saw © PeerJ, Inc. 2012-2023 | Public user content licensed CC BY 4.0 unless otherwise specified but didn't open the pdf Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
It’s unlikely Film Magazine Network owns the rights to a studio’s film poster. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, no exif, sent via Whatsapp and has a OBG watermark. PCP Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 15:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work as claimed, no exif, PCP Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
No exif, credited to insta and uploader claims to be in photo - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does not exist nor was used during the time period. LieutenantThanon (talk) 12:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Not sure about that...a few points:
- This is depicted in Cochrane & Elliot's military insignia book.
- This file is widely used by more than a dozen projects.
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Hoax roundels, per resolution: "Kept: on Commons we usually delete images with copyright issues, vandalism or something out of scope. Inaccuracies don't lead to deletion here by themselves when images are used in Wikimedia projects."
Keep Josh (talk) 00:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep Widely COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Strakhov (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
out of scope, see also wikidata:Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q107637572 Emu (talk) 13:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 15:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Artista ? 186.173.30.61 18:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file of a non-contributor; outside of COM:SCOPE. It was uploaded only for use in a now-deleted self-promotional page on English Wikipedia. Marbletan (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 15:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image, crop from an unknown source. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
When I was younger, i uploadet this picture from myself. i cant log in to my old account. 2001:1715:9D92:E4F0:35E8:32E8:7AF:A264 20:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
When I was younger, i uploadet this picture from myself. i cant log in to my old account. 2001:1715:9D92:E4F0:35E8:32E8:7AF:A264 20:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete it. 186.173.19.112 21:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, we can do without this. --Strakhov (talk) 15:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:NUDE photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete obvious COM:PORN Dronebogus (talk) 05:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Uploader also uploaded numerous copyvios. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 06:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JDipterocarpus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted sculptures, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pinaglabanan Shrine. Contributions of a suspected User:Judgefloro sockpuppet: see this concern by me.
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 11.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 10.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 08.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 09.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 07.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 06.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 05.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 04.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 01.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 03.jpg
- File:Pinaglabanan Shrine San Juan 02.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- More FOP violations by JDipterocarpus
More no-PHL FOP violations, seems impatient (despite the fact that FOP is still non-existent and that House of Representatives discussions on pending bills have yet to be conducted).
- File:Kalayaan Avenue QC 11.jpg
- File:Kalayaan Avenue QC 10.jpg
- File:Kalayaan Avenue QC 08.jpg
- File:Kalayaan Avenue QC 09.jpg
- File:Kalayaan Avenue QC 04.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JDipterocarpus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern works of architecture in the Philippines, where there is no freedom of panorama. Missing commercial license permissions from the architects.
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 25.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 24.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 22.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 23.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 21.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 20.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 19.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 18.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 17.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 16.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 15.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 14.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 13.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 12.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 10.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 09.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 07.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 08.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 06.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 05.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 04.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 02.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 01.jpg
- File:Entertainment City Pasay 03.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope/non notable - currently used in an article that is up for DR on EN WP
Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Claimed as own work but has FBMD and is her profile pic here https://pinterandmartin.com/antonella-gambotto-burke/ - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Studio type photos shared via whatsapp but claimed as own work. PCP - needs OTRS to keep
- File:Video vixen.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0047.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0030.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0104.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0078.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0107.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0092.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0083.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0097.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0095.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0068.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0066.jpg
- File:IMG-20230416-WA0027.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subarnamajhi2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most taken from FB per MD and 2 sent via Whatsapp - unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS to keep
- File:Satish Singh AFC Cup.jpg
- File:Satish Singh Football Player.jpg
- File:SatishSingh.jpg
- File:Satish Singh.jpg
- File:IMG-20220302-WA0027.jpg
- File:FBIMG1682572903774.jpg
- File:FB IMG1682572244817.jpg
- File:IMG-20220302-WA0013.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subarnamajhi2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]seems like to be copyvios(low res+no metadata+other copyvios that user have+File:Satish Singh 19.jpg has URL on it) . need proof that shows they are free licensed.
- File:Satish Singh 19.jpg
- File:Satish Singh Churchill.jpg
- File:Ghiixfhkk.jpg
- File:Churchill brothers.jpg
- File:S.singh.jpg
- File:Satish Singh Churchill brothers.jpg
- File:Satish Singh.jpg
- File:Satish Singh football player.jpg
- File:Satish Singh.png
- File:Satish singh.png
- File:SatishSinghFootballer.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Architectural design
[edit]Derivative works of copyrighted architectural designs by the late w:en:Francisco Mañosa, copyright held by his estate which is his architectural firm. Violation of his copyright, missing commercial license permit from his company. Photos are uploads of JDipterocarpus (talk · contribs).
- File:Architectural designs LRT 01.jpg
- File:Architectural designs LRT 02.jpg
- File:Architectural designs LRT 03.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Claimed as own work but no exif info even for the studio quality shots. Plus copyrighted book covers
- File:Mindy Budgor Face Photograph.jpg
- File:Mindy Budgor.jpg
- File:Mindy budgor book2.jpg
- File:Mindy budgor 2.jpg
- File:Mindy budgor book.jpg
- File:Mindy budgor.jpg
- File:Mindy Budgor Photo Author.jpg
- File:Mindy Budgor Photo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I suspect this has been copied from a website - aside from the background, it's identical to the images of his YouTube channel here and here (scroll down, they're not the first images of him at those sites) Girth Summit (blether) 11:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Flickrwashing - account has 0 followers Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RefusedSober3214 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Can't see how these fit in with the project scope in any way. They are kind of derivative of TV programs but are not actual logos etc
- File:Table Footballers Wives.jpg
- File:Brian the Builder.jpg
- File:Garbage Hunt.jpg
- File:Casually.jpg
- File:TOBBCCR Medley.png
- File:Men in Splat bumper.jpg
- File:Eat My Goal (World Cup Final).jpg
- File:On the Ball 2002.jpg
- File:Anty & Decky the Garden Goblins.jpg
- File:Taggfart opening sequence.jpg
- File:Diet Another Day caption card.jpg
- File:Des Clarke in Hollywood.jpg
- File:AAMWB.jpg
- File:TOTPLA60 logo.png
- File:All New Top of the Pops.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Herby talk thyme 11:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Copiright violation MisterXS (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation MisterXS (talk) 11:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paula B LP (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these are own work as claimed. Mix of old photos, newspapers, etc. PCP
- File:Cobanera ME.png
- File:Primeros egresados dibujo.png
- File:Placa Graciela Punte.jpg
- File:Inifta abrazo.jpg
- File:MicroscopioSTM1.jpg
- File:Placa inifta.jpg
- File:INIFTA frente.jpg
- File:Copant 1968.png
- File:Tesis Paulina.png
- File:Paulina Muhlmann.png
- File:Beatriz cougnet.jpg
- File:Mortola mensula.png
- File:Punte lef.png
- File:IOP Graciela Punte Award 2022-08-25 at 14.02.09.png
- File:La PlataGroup2014.jpg
- File:Foto AAMe-2009-a.jpg
- File:Tesis radice.png
- File:Placa fisica.png
- File:Mercedes Corvalan.png
- File:2022-06-06-dia-de-la-ingenieria-feed-instagram-1080-×-1350-px-5.png
- File:Leonor Colombo.png
- File:Titina Mocoroa.jpg
- File:Cobanera.png
- File:Pola Harboure.png
- File:En el IPN sola.jpg
- File:Elena Tchalidy.jpg
- File:20210603 230010 mfnr.jpg
- File:Evelia Edith Oyhenart.jpg
- File:Evelia oyhenart.jpg
- File:Virginia Ceirano2.jpg
- File:Virginia Ceirano.png
- File:Coira.png
- File:Beatriz Ghirelli.png
- File:Graciela de Antoni (Q70914315).jpg
- File:Escáner 20190816 (6).png
- File:Lentejas medio liquido.png
- File:Tesis doctoral Cobanera .jpg
- File:Fotografía de Adriana Leila Calvo.png
- File:Adriana calvo.jpg
- File:Judith Desimoni 2005.jpg
- File:Vallve.jpg
- File:Humedales 2004.jpg
- File:Patricia Massolo en su laboratorio.jpg
- File:Pat30001.jpg
- File:Diario foto pat.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Only uploaded for spam on dewiki. Out of scope. XenonX3 (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Only uploaded for spam on dewiki. Out of scope. XenonX3 (talk) 14:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kenancalkur (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTUSED. Unused screenshots and logos of questionable notability website.
- File:Web Sitenin footer bölüm.png
- File:Web sitesin ön yüzü.png
- File:Son dakika.png
- File:Kadın haber.png
- File:Spor haberleri.png
- File:Tmbhaberlogo2.png
- File:Tmbhaberlogo1.png
- File:Tmbhaberlogo.png
Netora (talk) 15:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Himura Hoshi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused icons/logos without clear purpose, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused failed/blurry photo, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peter Brownless (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal file and low quality image with many better alternatives
Юрий Д.К 16:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Que bueno que no haya sido borrado. El auto viejo, el pose del joven, las gafas, y sobre todo los colores hacen de esta una foto admirable. KEEP. 181.43.7.29 13:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 16:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PMG1842213 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Keeper 0084.jpg
- File:Parker, Jacob C.jpg
- File:Jacob Cornelius.jpg
- File:Jacob-C-Parker 02.jpg
- File:Jacob-C-Parker 01.jpg
- File:Author Companionship.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PMG1842213 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality, out of scope
- File:Rain 008.jpg
- File:Windy 001008.jpg
- File:Jacobcparker.jpg
- File:Evening 1008.jpg
- File:Nice discover.png
Юрий Д.К 16:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope and likely not own works
- File:Oliva de Mallorca o Mallorquina 1.jpg
- File:Oliva de Mallorca o Mallorquina 2.jpg
- File:Logo oliva.jpg
Юрий Д.К 17:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope (very low quality)
- File:Orquídeas rosas, México.jpg
- File:Gerberas de colores, México.jpg
- File:Flor de Violetas, México.jpg
- File:Raíz de Orquídeas, México.jpg
- File:Agua fluyendo bajo el sol, México.jpg
- File:Tierra y tiempo de flores, México.jpg
- File:Espiral21.jpg
Юрий Д.К 17:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dima2511000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Highly unlikely to be self-made, blurred or low quality photos that seem to be done by someone else
- File:Великая Княгиня Мария Кирилловна, Княгиня Лейнингенская со старшими сыновьями Принцами Эмихом Кириллом и Карлом Владимиром.png
- File:Der Tod in Flandern.png
- File:Fridericus Rex Grenadier March.png
- File:Rostislav Romanoff Jr..png
- File:Edgar Puaud.png
- File:Елена Павловна (великая княгиня) (начало 1860-х).png
- File:Светлейшая (Великая княгиня) Виктория Романовна и Великий князь Георгий Михайлович.jpg
- File:Юная Мария Владимировна Романова.png
- File:ლეონიდა გიორგის ასული ბაგრატიონი-მუხრანელი.png
- File:Виктория Мелита (Романова).png
- File:Георгий Михайлович в 2000-е.png
- File:Великий князь Владимир Кириллович Романов в 20-е годы.png
- File:Г.М.Романов.png
- File:Владимир Кириллович.png
- File:Великий князь Владимир Кириллович Романов.png
- File:Ребекка Беттарини.jpg
- File:Великий князь Георгий Михайлович.png
_(%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE_1860-%D1%85).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B8_%D0%92%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BD%D1%8F%D0%B7%D1%8C_%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
rubin16 (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality image of standing child. Plenty of better images already on Commons of similar subject matter Headlock0225 (talk) 17:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Flag of Hungary with arms (state).svg with incorrectly straighted cross on the crown. Fry1989 eh? 17:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Distorted image. A correct SVG is available under another file. Fry1989 eh? 17:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Derivative work of drawings by unknown, probably non-notable artists. Definitely copyright violation, maybe out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Publicidad G10? 186.173.30.61 19:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro C. J. Vera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. Mostly taken from FB as per EXIF data.
- File:Politicos colorados 1948.jpg
- File:Carlos Caballero Gatti en su vejez.jpg
- File:Tenientes Carlos Caballero Gatti y Guido Chase Sardi.jpg
- File:Epifanio Mendez Fleitas y su esposa Frdesvinda Vall de Fleita.jpg
- File:Don Pablo Alborno.jpg
- File:Juan Bautista Gill Aguinaga.jpg
- File:Luis toranzos.jpg
- File:Augusto Roa Bastos y su Familia.jpg
- File:Roberto Holden Jara y su familia.jpg
- File:Pintores Paraguayos.jpg
- File:Luis Toranzos 1950.jpg
- File:Jose Felix Estigarribia in his deathbed.jpg
- File:Efraim Cardozo frente a la tumba del Mariscal Estigarribia.jpg
- File:Artistas del Paraguay.jpg
- File:Roberto Holden Jara de joven.jpg
- File:Emiliano Gonzalez Navero, Jose Patricio Guggiari y Juan Sinforiano Bogarin.jpg
- File:Tenientes Ramiro Rodriguez Alcala y Guido Chase Sardi.jpg
- File:Gral. Jorge Thompson Molina.jpg
- File:Jorge Thompson Molina.jpg
- File:Manuel Gondra Joven.jpg
- File:Hipolito Sanchez Quell.jpg
- File:Cesar Gondra.jpg
- File:Juan Gualberto Gonzalez y Jose S. Decoud.jpg
- File:Manuel Gondra de estudiante.jpg
- File:Blancanieves Zaldivar.jpg
- File:Capitan Jose Matias Bado.jpg
- File:Cadetes del Colegio Militar 1940.jpg
- File:Manuel Dominguez Goiburu.jpg
- File:Oscar Ferreiro Poeta.jpg
- File:Bernardino Caballero 1936.jpg
- File:Teniente Abdon Caballero Alvarez.jpg
- File:Moises Vertoni y Leopoldo Benitez.jpg
- File:Mujer del Paraguay.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro C. J. Vera (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Illustrations/COM:DW: missing original author, source, date, and permission. Without that, no way of knowing what the license should be.
File:Trompa Paraguaya.jpg(artist identified - withdrawn)- File:Baron del triunfo.jpg (related copy found)
File:Gaucho Latinoamericano.jpg(artist identified - withdrawn)- File:Gral. Bernardino Caballero retrato 2.jpg (Likely colorized version of c. 1960 copy of older portrait)
- File:Eliza lynch Retrato de 1987.jpg (not found)
- File:Fulgencio Yegros a caballo.jpg (not found)
- File:Bernardino Caballero Melgarejo y Genes oleo.jpg (not found)
- File:Eduardo Schaerer oleo.jpg (not found)
File:Gral. Paunero.jpg(artist identified - withdrawn)- File:Coronel Julian Insfran.jpg (not found)
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Paraguay. All those that were created more than 70 years ago per PD-Paraguay. I say keep all and let the nominator sort out the few that are post 1953 and renominate them, such as "ile:Eliza lynch Retrato de 1987.jpg". --RAN (talk) 03:11, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Zero evidence provided that these are {{PD-Paraguay}}! It is the uploader's responsibility to provide that, not the DR nominator... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- The evidence is in the dates they were created and the terms of the license PD-Paraguay. We fix correctable errors, unless your goal is to delete as many as possible. --RAN (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Zero evidence provided that these are {{PD-Paraguay}}! It is the uploader's responsibility to provide that, not the DR nominator... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Artist identified for File:Gaucho Latinoamericano.jpg, alternate version found for File:Baron del triunfo.jpg (c. 1903). While the original uploader failed to provide accurate author, source, etc., information. A little work with Google Lens found those two relatively quickly. Recommend keeping those that can be identified rather than mass deleting.
On their face, most of the paintings appear likely to meet {{PD-old-auto-expired}}.The photographs are more problematic. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)- Running quickly through the paintings, File:Gral. Paunero.jpg
can probably benow properly sourced. File:Gral. Bernardino Caballero retrato 2.jpg is likely too recent (c. 1960) to be used without more information. The rest will require more work. —Tcr25 (talk)
- Running quickly through the paintings, File:Gral. Paunero.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. Keeping the 2nd file as well. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro C. J. Vera (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with FB/transmission code in EXIF data. No original author, date, source, and permission.
- File:Modesto Delgado Rodas.jpg
- File:Roberto Holden Jara en su estudio.jpg
- File:Myrna Loy 20s.jpg
- File:Paraguayita.jpg
- File:Gral. Nicolas Delgado.jpg
- File:Mcal. Jose Felix Estigarribia.jpg
- File:Sebastian Lloret.jpg
- File:Beso apasionado.jpg
- File:Octaviano Rivarola Diaz de Bedoya.jpg
- File:Sargento Candido Silva.jpg
- File:Raimundo Rolon.jpg
- File:Coronel Valois Rivarola busto.jpg
- File:Teniente Andres Herreros Busto.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above Bedivere (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Most of these I'm not finding. File:Beso apasionado.jpg is from a promo still for the 1955 movie "Smiles of a Summer Night", clearly still under copyright. File:Myrna Loy 20s.jpg is from the 1929 film "Desert Song", which won't enter public domain until 2025. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The following as PD-Paraguay: File:Raimundo Rolon.jpg and Modesto Delgado Rodas.jpg and File:Mcal. Jose Felix Estigarribia.jpg and File:Sebastian Lloret.jpg--RAN (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except for 2 identified by Richard (File:Raimundo Rolon.jpg was created 1945, which means it wasn't PD at the time of the URAA date). —holly {chat} 22:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Image already on the internet in 2017 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Patrick Kaelin) M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Великая Княгиня Мария Кирилловна, Княгиня Лейнингенская со старшими сыновьями Принцами Эмихом Кириллом и Карлом Владимиром.png
[edit]This file is not free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Rosenzweig τ 08:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
{{subst:Löschantrag|1=Deine Begründung.Diese Foto bildet nicht den beschriebenen Gegenstand (Haus) ab und sollte deshalb gelöscht werden (der Autor) P22:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)}} Laloom (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (the correct Haus Schmidt would apparently be this one). --Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of a free license Achim55 (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 21:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
maybe Public Domain Albania, but definitely not CC0 (not own work) Albinfo (talk) 12:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
definitley not own work – grabbed from the web Albinfo (talk) 23:56, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
definitely not own work Albinfo (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Testing upload function. Photo unused so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAntiPoggerDoesWiki (talk • contribs) 13:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ippantekina as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: File source (https://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/en/newsroom/2023/04/07/the-eras-tour-hillsboroughs-version) does not indicate a CC license, presumably copyrighted. CC license is incorrect and I see no evidence of it, but Florida releases public records into the public domain, so there's a non-trivial chance that this is {{PD-Florida}} and a speedy has to be declined. My worry with that is the copyright status of the set of images and the dome on the left side; they seem greater-than-de minimis, but I can't find their original publications nor the source information for them. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot from the 1972 American film The Candidate. Will be copyrighted until 2068. Abzeronow (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
![16:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/08#c-Abzeronow-20230508163100-File:Robert_Redford_as_Bill_McKay_in_"The_Candidate"_(1972).webp){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2068. --Rosenzweig τ 12:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![12:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/08#c-Rosenzweig-20230521121800-File:Robert_Redford_as_Bill_McKay_in_"The_Candidate"_(1972).webp){kind=link}
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
uploaded a PNG cleare version of the same file Despechi.ro (talk) 09:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:14, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
2000 French stamp by fr:Jame's Prunier(born 1959) who is still living. Stamps are protected the same as art in France so this would become public domain 70 years after Prunier dies. Otherwise, VRT permission from Prunier himself would be needed. Abzeronow (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Dark photo of bad quality. The photo is my work Tomaatje12 (talk) 17:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
I doubt that this file was taken by the uploader.
The EXIF info says "Software used: Picasa", it was uploaded by a hit-and-run account (an account that uploads only one file that seems to be a copyvio) and the image can be found on Google Lens and TinEye with the copyright notice "© Helmut Wimmer"
Maybe the uploader @Meisterklasse.a: can tell use more about this --D-Kuru (talk) 05:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @D-Kuru! I'm not a "hit-and-run" Guy. Yes, the picture was taken by Helmut Wimmer and he waved the rights. Meisterklasse.a (talk) 10:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Meisterklasse.a: Thanks for your reply. How did Helmut Wimmer exactly wave the rights? Did he publish it under a free licence (If so: Where)? Is there any source that proofs the claim that he published it under CC-BY-SA-4.0? And when did you become the author (author=Meisterklasse.a)?
- On I'm not a "hit-and-run" Guy - You are maybe not, but your account checks all the suspicious marks that usually only those accounts do that are used to only upload copyrighted material. Your reply is the first indication that you could be the exception from the general rule.
- --D-Kuru (talk) 16:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @D-Kuru! Thank you for your reply and the explanation. It's always good to be an exception. Is it the best and easiest way to reupload the file including the necessary statement from Helmut Wimmer? Meisterklasse.a (talk) 09:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Meisterklasse.a: On Wikimedia Commons file description and their licencing have to be accurate. Example: If you are not the original author information like "Source=Own work" and "Author=Meisterklasse.a" is just plain wrong.
- The important information is: Where did you get the file from (source)? Who is the real author? Under which licence was this file published? How did the author licence the file? Do you have a written permission or did he just give you the permission verbally? Is there any proof that what you claim is true? You have to understand that basically everybody could tell us anything on Commons and even we act in good faith there is a clear border to being stupidly naive. You are maybe a real human, but for all what's worth there is no indication for me or anybody else that you are not a bot based on ChatGPT. You also have to know that on Wikimedia Commons every file should be usable for any purpose including commercial use. So we have to demand a certain level of trustworthiness.
- --D-Kuru (talk) 19:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @D-Kuru! I fully understand and agree. As mentioned, I'll reupload the file and already sent the written permission to permissions-de@wikimedia.org. Thank you for your support! Meisterklasse.a (talk) 15:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023060110009631 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 05:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
No es una bandera libre ni es trabajo propio. 186.173.206.133 00:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Igual que anterior 186.173.206.133 00:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
No es libre ni trabajo propio 186.173.206.133 00:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
No es libre ni trabajo propio 186.173.206.133 00:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DMacks as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). Current license of CC BY-SA 4.0 doesn't seem to be warranted, but is this under the threshold of originality? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: likely below TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO, text only. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
I encouraged the user to upload the pic thinking the artwork was 3D, but it isn't and therefore is a copyright violation. Apologies to all involved! DrThneed (talk) 00:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eihel as no permission (No permission since) Eihel (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal photo used for cross-wiki spam purposes. See d:Q117864661 and nl:Wikipedia:Te beoordelen pagina's/Toegevoegd_20230503#Yann'Sine. Wutsje 06:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eihel as no permission (No permission since). The contributor does not seem to regularize the situation. Eihel (talk) 01:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, crop from unknown source, and OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
A hoax: self-made coat of arms. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Looking at the Flickr profile, the majority of the uploads appears to be other people’s work, likely Flickrwashing. Another upload by this user credits a different Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/photos/42231620@N07/3997972580/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Promo/press photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Does not look like an own work (notability is also quite problematic). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Does not look like an own work (notability is also quite problematic). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Does not look like an own work (notability is also quite problematic). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Does not look like an own work (notability is also quite problematic). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Well-Informed Optimist as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: intricate pattern = likely not below TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This subject is plagued by promotional socks on enwiki, and many different editors claiming "own work" of her art that is found on her or other websites. Here we have a social-media-profile style image with no EXIF from one such editor, I'm calling COM:PCP on their claim of ownwork DMacks (talk) 02:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; small crop from an unknown source, missing essential source info and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
personal metadata Photohelp13 (talk) 05:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused low quality photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Map with one US state deleted, serves no educational purpose. We already have Locator maps for ND too, that are more suitable. Enyavar (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
As the author and owner of the file, I no longer want to distribute it under a free license. The file should be deleted. Zavistovich (talk) 07:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal logo (out of scope). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
no source no metadata used for cross wiki promo Hoyanova (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
uploaded as own work, but image appears on other websites, eg. here DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
File with spam name and desription. Logo of spam-wiki-company. Founders of this company illegaly use Wikipedia logos. The file is not used anywhere. This is The organization is banned by the public organization "Wikipedia Ukraine" (the official branch of the Wikimedia Foundation in Ukraine). Its creators are blocked indefinitely. There is no reason why this file is needed. Keneris (talk) 11:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
I do not see CC license on the source site, but a copyright mark: https://festival-larochelle.org/en/presentation/ Gumruch (talk) 11:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, photographer Jean-Michel Sicot gave us his aproval to open rights for this picture and use it on Wikipedia. What action should I perform to indicate this ? Etiennedelcambre (talk) 13:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Etiennedelcambre, the photographer needs to go through the process at COM:VRT, affirming that he gives the right for people to use the image commercially, and not just on Wikipedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever permision has been received via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
File with spam name and desription. Logo of spam-wiki-company. Founders of this company illegaly use Wikipedia logos. The file is not used anywhere. This is The organization is banned by the public organization "Wikipedia Ukraine" (the official branch of the Wikimedia Foundation in Ukraine). Its creators are blocked indefinitely. There is no reason why this file is needed. Keneris (talk) 11:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Seeing no indication why this should be free. FunkMonk (talk) 12:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that points to the use of this flag by the Cambodian Ministry of National Defense LieutenantThanon (talk) 12:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that points to the use of this flag by the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces. LieutenantThanon (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete The image is from this source which does not indicate a cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
I have created a replacement which follows the correct standards https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IE_TSM_Ch_2_Fig_4.2.2_b.png EthanL13 (talk) 12:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
we have a new logo and would like to create a new wikipedia page with our new logo for our whole group TMS Marketing (talk) 14:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Question What is the deletion reason? We don't delete old logos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- we have a new logo and the old one is no more valid. Currently we are cleaning up all the old logos from the internet and would also like to create a new Wikipedia page. We don't want to confuse the visitors. 83.164.143.164 13:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- As I said, that is not a deletion reason. However, a likely result is for none of your logos to be hosted by this site because of a belief that logos have no educational value or that your company is not notable. Is there currently a Wikipedia page for TMS Marketing in any language? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the Valiant logo is likely above COM:TOO Austria. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file is noy free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file is not free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 14:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file is not free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 14:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file is not free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fantasy design made by by a random blogger http://zebratigerfish.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_03.html. Not a "local" design, has no educational value, and should not be used in any article. Reywas92 (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Fantasy design with no status, just made up by an unrelated person for an event that he wanted to have something to represent all territories. Never actually used or adopted, has no educational value, and should not be used be in any article. Reywas92 (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Sikander as no license (No license since) While I believe the copyright is PDMark, the image is probably out of scope as I can't see an educational use, so I'm converting to a normal DR. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Perfectly adequate to illustrate high school track & field, etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. It is useful contribution and "in scope." -- Ooligan (talk) 22:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: consensus is for "in scope". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
ou of project scope, not known person Piastu (talk) 15:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
nu permission from author - copyvio from https://partyflock.nl/en/artist/144049:Bankzitters Hoyanova (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FabianMatkowski as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Too old for COM:CSD#G7. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, redundant to File:Green Swastika.svg anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Por si el compositor no quiere una fotografía de él en un artículo de Wikipedia Zelpega Universe (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; si el fichero respecta el derecho de autor, pues no hay razón para borrarlo. Ruthven (msg) 15:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted material on Commons; the original video didn't have a creative commons tag before it was privated. The video is copyrighted by Nintendo, thus it violates copyright. https://web.archive.org/web/20170125030722/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28IsanbRZQs Yoshiman6464 (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. I can only express my agreement about the qualification carried out with regard to the copyright rights of this picture. At the time I uploaded it I did not inform myself enough and therefore I did not act with the required diligence. I apologize to the community and I assume my mistake. Japafe64 (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Extremely poor quality, out of scope. Many better analogs exist Юрий Д.К 16:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%87%D1%91%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%87%D1%91%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As the author and owner of the file, I no longer want to distribute it under a free license. The file should be deleted. Zavistovich (talk) 07:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal logo (out of scope). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
school logo, highly unlikely tobe 'own work' DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Bonito sombrero, pero sólo 8 KB, seria mejor un poco más grande. 186.173.30.61 19:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, low-res/web-size screengrab image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Painting 186.173.30.61 19:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. We need the formal written permission from the copyright holder, i.e. the photographer. Yann (talk) 19:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (subject is same as uploader). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation. Lack of information of where the the photograph was taken. But in many countries there is no Freedonmof Panorama for 2D artworks. So Uploader pleasd supply country where the photograph was taken otherwise it will should be deleted. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- might be qualify as COM:GRAFFITI. -- {{Non-free graffiti}}. -- Geagea (talk) 21:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- yes but we still need a country to see what rules apply. Headlock0225 (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: flag. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 13:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep At this point, I’m almost certain Εὐθυμένης is just nominating things without any reason. To nominate something, please provide a valid reason, as “logo” is not a valid reason. Flagvisioner (talk) 13:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Wouldn’t it count as 3. “folk literary and artistic creations”? Flagvisioner (talk) 12:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Actually no, it is a simplification of the coat of arms to the flag (no white band.) Thus, it isn’t protected. Flagvisioner (talk) 12:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Plus it is specified in an official document, in Decision Odlok o uporabi grba in zastave Občine Kobilje. Published in Slovene official gazette. I recommend you do your research before nominating something, Εὐθυμένης. Flagvisioner (talk) 12:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Actually no, it is a simplification of the coat of arms to the flag (no white band.) Thus, it isn’t protected. Flagvisioner (talk) 12:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Artist died in 2002. No sign of release to PD. "Own work" is highly improbable. Rsteen (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thue Thuesen, the artist in question, was my uncle, and me and my sister are his sole heirs. So I believe that makes us the copyright owners, or? --Jensga (talk) 06:36, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Jensga. Thank you for clearing this up. Wikipedia is very careful that copyrights are not violated, so you need to write an email about each photo of the paintings by your uncle. The template is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates. When that is done, we will be happy to share the artworks in question. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 04:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023051010013914 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Procedurally closed: Procedurally closing this DR, as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Museum figures in Japan was opened prior to this and includes this file. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mike556731 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Exhibitionism, low quality COM:NUDITY
Dronebogus (talk) 05:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per nominator Юрий Д.К 18:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
How do you know, that the photographer is 70 years dead? For 1920 photos this is not obvious. Also the license claims publication before 1928 – how do you know that? Taivo (talk) 07:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep First of all, how do you know they aren't? This photograph was taken in Malta exile and anonymous since, as it can be seen from the copy, bears no insignia of photographer.
Secondly, you say that how you can prove that this was used before 1928. 1928-9 was the period of Turkish language-alphabet reform, thus it would have been rather hard for detect to some random photograph. However, this is one the most famous portraits of him, and, as it can be seen from the publication Resimli Ay, was published as late as 1924, the year of his death. (Tashrin-i Sânî ["Second Tashrin", November] 1924)
Questioning things is a good habit, but I believe requires few conditions: 1) Having a base to build your views over it. 2) Not being rude, and using a logical but courteous language. Your type of questioning lacks from both. Maybe next time you may consider doing some research before questioning and requesting a deletion offer. Especially considering that it's related with Turkey and Turkish, with a language and literature even to a degree unknown to foreign language studies. Beyaz Deriili (talk) 00:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC) - Keep Per Beyaz Deriili. Gökalp died in 1924, so publication prior to 1928 is a reasonable assumption for this sort of portrait. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree. The claim of anonymous work is not obvious and needs evidence. Also claim, that the photo was published during his lifetime, needs evidence as well. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- The image from Resimli Ay (en) that's linked above is a vignette of the same image (Here is a clearer PDF version that can be examined more closely.) The issue is dated "Teşrin-i Sânî 1340", which is using the Rumi calendar, but lines up with November 1924. The article is an obituary for Gökalp, who died in late October 1924. This should satisfy the question about at least a version of the photo being published prior to 1928, which would make {{PD-old-assumed-expired}} a possible valid license. As to whether or not the photographer can be determined, there's not one listed as best I can tell with the Resimli Ay printing, nor is one listed in any of the many instances where this picture or a version of it is popping up in searches. That's not definitive proof that the photographer cannot be known, but it doesn't appear to be attributed anywhere, which would make {{PD-Turkey}} valid. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Additional data point supporting PD and anonymous photographer: A version of this image is used on the cover of Competing Ideologies in the Late Ottoman Empire and Early Turkish Republic, and the publisher (Bloomsbury) credits the photo to "Historic Collection / Alamy Stock Photo". Alamy Stock clearly lists the photo as being a historic image in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 11:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- How it's not obvious? I have provided a clear use of it, thus making it and its variants public domain. Why do you neglect my comment, and respond to someone other? How is this act is good faith?
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 10:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- The image from Resimli Ay (en) that's linked above is a vignette of the same image (Here is a clearer PDF version that can be examined more closely.) The issue is dated "Teşrin-i Sânî 1340", which is using the Rumi calendar, but lines up with November 1924. The article is an obituary for Gökalp, who died in late October 1924. This should satisfy the question about at least a version of the photo being published prior to 1928, which would make {{PD-old-assumed-expired}} a possible valid license. As to whether or not the photographer can be determined, there's not one listed as best I can tell with the Resimli Ay printing, nor is one listed in any of the many instances where this picture or a version of it is popping up in searches. That's not definitive proof that the photographer cannot be known, but it doesn't appear to be attributed anywhere, which would make {{PD-Turkey}} valid. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree. The claim of anonymous work is not obvious and needs evidence. Also claim, that the photo was published during his lifetime, needs evidence as well. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept, given that we have 1924 publication and that Alamy claims the photo to be in public domain, I withdraw the request. Taivo (talk) 17:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:Child birth in Japan (display).jpg
- File:Japan - Tokyo - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Diorama (3).jpg
- File:Japan - Tokyo - Tokyo Edo Museum - Diorama.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:01.Taira Tadamori arrested the demon(Oni).jpg
- File:02. Not Heike Clan, Not a person of Note.jpg
- File:03.Lady Hotoke Gozen visit Giou.jpg
- File:04.Grandchildren of Taira-no-Kiyomori bring shames on Regent.jpg
- File:05.Only Syunkan was unexcused 1.jpg
- File:05.Only Syunkan was unexcused 2.jpg
- File:06.The Vengeful ghosts.jpg
- File:07.Heike Clan Army lost at the battle of Fuji river.jpg
- File:08.Taira-no-Shigehira burnes Big Buddha.jpg
- File:09.Taira-no-Kiyomori was dead with a fever.jpg
- File:10.The Battle of Ichi no Tani.jpg
- File:11.Taira-no-Atsumori and Kumagai Naozane.jpg
- File:12.Nasu no Yoichi, firing at the fan target.jpg
- File:13.Emperor Antoku casting himself into the water.jpg
- File:14.Taira-no-Noritsune's fierce dead.jpg
- File:15.Destruction of Heike Clan.jpg
- File:16.Bell sound of Jetavana-vihāra.jpg
- File:17. The Lute Priest sings The tale of the Heike.jpg
- File:Chuhachi Ninomiya-Inventor(Wax doll).jpg
- File:Kukai-Priest(Wax doll).jpg
- File:Masaoka Shiki-Haiku poet(Wax doll).jpg
- File:Miki Takeo-Politician(Wax doll).jpg
- File:Sakamoto Ryoma and Nakaoka Shintaro-Samurai politician(Wax doll).jpg
- File:Yamashita Tomoyuki-Soldier(Wax doll).jpg
- File:Yoshida Shigeru-Politician(Wax doll).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Milwaukee Public Museum May 2023 21 (Third Planet--Hell Creek of Eastern Montana, 66 million years ago--Dromaeosaurus).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for such artwork in the US, unfortunately. FunkMonk (talk) 11:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Are museum dioramas considered artwork? Based on the huge number of photos of dioramas from American museums on Commons, I find this highly unlikely. Michael Barera (talk) 02:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Any artistic sculpture or model is art. The reason why we have many such images up is simply that they're constantly uploaded faster than they can be detected. But some such exhibits are old enough to be in the public domain due to age. FunkMonk (talk) 03:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Fuente perdida. DP? 186.173.206.133 00:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Proper license, and no valid reason for deletion, if we delete every image with link rot, we will eventually have nothing. The whole purpose of Commons is preservation of fugitive images. --RAN (talk) 01:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hum. no carece de razón, del todo. Veamos qué va a pasar... 186.173.206.133 01:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per RAN. Red Phoenician (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). Author has since claimed that this is available under the Taiwanese Government Website Open Information Announcement. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: The source is New Taipei City Council, not New Taipei City Government. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 00:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). Uploader has since claimed that there is a Government Website Open Information Announcement that aplies to this file. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: The source is New Taipei City Council, not New Taipei City Government. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 00:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). The uploader has since claimed Government Website Open Information Announcement applies. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: The source is from New Taipei City Council, not New Taipei City Government. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 01:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). This is well under COM:TOO USA. Is it under TOO in its country of origin? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: probably fine from TOO standpoint, but is out of scope as a personal file of a non-contributor (account's only visible global edit). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). Since then, the uploader added {{GWOIA}} to the page. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: The source is from New Taipei City Council, not New Taipei City Government. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 01:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Darrenthompson123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Exhibitionism, low quality penis images
- File:Darrens micropenis 05.jpg
- File:Darrens micropenis 04.jpg
- File:Darrens micropenis 03.jpg
- File:Darrens micropenis 02.jpg
- File:Darrens micropenis 01.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- What makes a "good quality" penis? Trade (talk) 17:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- They’re badly framed and have extraneous crap like half-removed clothing. We have better images of the same subject Dronebogus (talk) 20:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Юрий Д.К 18:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio. COM:TOO? See also w:en:File:Cape Town City F.C. (2016) logo.png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Don't think its TOO, non free file. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Source lists this as a 1940s American photograph. It could be public domain. But non-renewal would have to be checked. Abzeronow (talk) 16:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: PD old assumed in 2070. Ruthven (msg) 07:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The emblem of coronation of Charles III was complex enough to be above COM:TOO UK A1Cafel (talk) 10:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have no legal expertise, however this image appears to be a simple snapshot of a publicly displayed flag (unlike the previously deleted file, which appeared to be a professional quality graphic image). Why has this photograph been nominated for deletion? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 06:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Do we have ideas whether {{FoP-UK}} requires enough distance? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Let's just be brave and set a precedent. We should be seeking to preserve history, not erase it. No Swan So Fine (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No FOP is applicible here. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Original file was deleted due to copyright concern A1Cafel (talk) 12:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Original file was deleted due to copyright concern A1Cafel (talk) 12:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Cakelot1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Somebody saying that there "fans and creators are allowed" to do something is not the same as releasing content under a free licence. There is no legal underpinning to what is claimed here and can't be excepted on commons. The video in question is not released under youtube CC and there is no indication of actual free-licence being in play. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment See prior discussion at Special:Permalink/760942817#File:Ethan Klein 2023.jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- No actual licence was provided. Klein didn't agree to legal restrictions that you have to when you put content under a free licence. He didn't agree to the terms of the CCBY4.0 licence ([3]). Particularly, there is nothing legally preventing him from changing his mind and taking down reuses he doesn't like in the future, thus it is non-free. The explicit rights given to re-users is why we require proper Licensing. Cakelot1 (talk) 23:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I'm copying the discussion from User talk:Kdog5454 below (Cakelot1 (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)):
- Saying “fans and creators” was perhaps a bit more hyperbolic and worded just to sound more intelligent than it should have been. It is entirely free to use, as stated by Klein. In early January he stated “… I am opening our IP (intellectual property) to the world… If you want to [use]… anything with me in it… go for it man. Monetize it. I will not claim, I will not remove, I will not do anything.” Evidence of this can be seen in this clip from an episode of the podcast which predates the screengrab: https://youtube.com/q2GGi9hbrZo
- There is sufficient evidence of the free license being sufficient here. Thank you for reading!! Kdog5454 (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- No, we need it to be legally licenced under a free licence. While it's very nice that the creator says that anybody can use it, if it's not actually licenced under a free licence then there is nothing legally preventing the creator going back on there word at any point. Commons requires that anybody be able to use files even if the creator wants to prevent (so long as they follow the listed restrictions). There is no such legally enforceable guarantee here.
- You can't just assume that the creator is fine with everything in the licence you've arbitrarily chosen (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). Again these are legally binding contracts not half thrown off platitudes. If you want the image kept I suggest you get the actual copyright holder to release it under an actual free licence via COM:VRT Cakelot1 (talk) 23:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete First, it is not irrevocable -- he can change his mind at any time. Commons requires "The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable." -- see COM:L
Second, he clearly calls for use only as "clips" -- the whole works are not free. It's also unclear exactly what works it applies to.
Third, and most important, copyright licenses must be in writing. The video statements have no legal status. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Per Implied license#Express license, non-exclusive oral licenses are allowed -- just not exclusive licenses (as those are effectively a transfer of at least part of a copyright). I'm also OK on the revocable front; he's expressly encouraging people to make money off that work, and to revoke a license like that without stating it's revocable could, I think, open himself up to damages (if it's even allowed, which I'm doubtful of, as it was not expressly revocable). The danger to me is what, exactly, the permission is for -- they clearly allow the use of highlight clips, but does the permission extend beyond that. They expressly say that uploading entire videos is not allowed, so there are some limitations. Could a screen grab be considered a very short clip? I could see that. Do they allow different types of derivative works, or just embedding clips into other videos? It's in that area, the scope of the given license, where it gets harder with these off-the-cuff licenses. Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete Erring on the side of caution would indicate deletion as the safest option per COM:Precautionary principle. Also I may have hastily added speedy delete tag to a file of a similar nature (File:Hila Klein 2023.jpg). Pabsoluterince (talk) 00:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete saying you won't go after users if they reuse your material under some not clearly delimited conditions (whole videos are clearly forbidden) is far from the formalities we require in COM:L to cover the back of our users. If they really meant CC-BY, then they can add it to the YT videos. Günther Frager (talk) 01:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Slovenian flags is PD. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 16:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). Is this above the relevant threshold of originality? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be below the threshold of originality. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nikkimaria as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). The file is a scan of a newspaper entry that was published in Oklahoma during 1954, meaning that {{PD-US-not-renewed}} is possible if the copyright on the collective work was not renewed. Has anybody checked the renewal records on this? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Deletion requests should be reserved for when you have determined that there is no renewal, not for speculation that there may be no renewal. Anyone can look up renewals themselves, and Online Books, which we link to, has all the publications that have renewed, and the start date for renewed issues. If we do not have an entry for Online Books, for that publication, there were no renewals at all. If you do not understand the concepts or procedures, you should ask at the Village Pump, rather than dive into the speedy deletion process. The Oklahoman did not renew any individual articles, or any issues. Thank you to Red-tailed_hawk for spotting this incorrect speedy deletion. --RAN (talk) 01:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- To clarify, I generally wouldn't open a deletion request myself to speculate on whether or not a source was renewed; my reasoning for opening this was to contest the speedy tag as being deficient. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Belbury as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). This looks like an FOP issue more than an issue with the actual photograph; (see: COM:COREL and {{PD-art}}), and per COM:F3, the complex COM:FOP rules are better dealt with in a deletion request than through speedy deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader appears to related to the artist, but we'd need COM:VRT to establish this. It appears the artist may have died in 1979, this is a 1968 work though so US copyright would be longer. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as no permission (No permission since 30 April 2023). The present license is probably wrong, but there's a good chance this photograph is in the public domain. This photo (per the uploader) is from 1958, which would make it eligible for {{PD-US-not-renewed}} if copyright was not renewed. Furthermore, this looks a lot like a hollywood publicity photograph, a genre of photographs frequently issued without valid copyright notice (see: {{PD-US-no-notice}}). Has anybody checked for renewal records on this photograph and/or tried to find the original source? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Nobody has come forward to say they've verified that the copyright was not renewed. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
1953 photograph from Kazakhstan, definitely not an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Possibly could enter the public domain in Kazakhstan next year as an anonymous photograph, but US copyright would be until at least 2049. 2074 undeletion date (120 years from 1953) just to be on the safe side) --Abzeronow (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabirabad rih (talk · contribs)
[edit]The main uncropped file has previously been kept at DR after Tineye came up empty, but I was able to find that the photograph is "© Executive power of Saatlı district" per <https://az.sputniknews.ru/20200516/azerbaijan-prezident-rajon-glava-uvolnenie-423958070.html>. Since Azeri government works are not in the public domain, these should be deleted as a copyright violation.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Museum figures in Japan
[edit]Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:130727 Rishiri Town Museum Rishiri Island Hokkaido Japan 03s3.jpg
- File:130727 Rishiri Town Museum Rishiri Island Hokkaido Japan 05s.jpg
- File:130727 Rishiri Town Museum Rishiri Island Hokkaido Japan 06s.jpg
- File:130727 Rishiri Town Museum Rishiri Island Hokkaido Japan 08s.jpg
- File:131123 Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology Japan08s5.jpg
- File:131123 Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology Japan10s5.jpg
- File:131123 Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology Japan11s5.jpg
- File:131123 Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology Japan13s5.jpg
- File:Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology05s3872.jpg
- File:Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology06s3872.jpg
- File:Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology07s3872.jpg
- File:Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology08s3872.jpg
- File:JNR Class 20 bed.jpg
- File:Little world, Aichi prefecture - Main exhibition hall - Dowry in India - Groom and bride - Gujarat, India.jpg
- File:Little world, Aichi prefecture - Main exhibition hall - Kachina dolls - Hopi people in USA.jpg
- File:Little world, Aichi prefecture - Main exhibition hall - Official with a cane - Quechua people in Perú.jpg
- File:Little world, Aichi prefecture - Main exhibition hall - Scene of Balinese Wedding Ritual.jpg
- File:National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka - Traditional wedding - Model - Korea.jpg
- File:Railway Museum in Saitama, Japan (3600649273).jpg
- File:Suigo-sawara-float-hall,large-figure-urishima,katiri-city,japan.JPG
- File:Yayoi people attires.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 019.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 020.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 021.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 043.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 044.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 045.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 046.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 047.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 048.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 055.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 056.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 057.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 058.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 059.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 060.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 061.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 062.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 063.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 064.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 065.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 066.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 088.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 089.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 096.JPG
- File:Yokohama Silk Museum 097.JPG
- File:自転車文化センター.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced of the need to delete File:Yayoi people attires.JPG. Is the attires the concern here? Or the 3D objects inside the clothes? whym (talk) 10:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- File:自転車文化センター.jpg - I can redact the figures from the image, if that is the concern. whym (talk) 10:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Likewise, I don't understand the problems of ancient exhibits or reproductions of thereof which are not copyrighted (ex. File:Yokohama Silk Museum 019.JPG). Or more modern stuff that is not subject to copyright like at File:Yokohama Silk Museum 021.JPG. If this is about the figures, they are functional mannequins and not subject to copyright (which is why Category:Mannequins in Japan exists and is not empty). For now, Keep Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please let me know exactly what part of the 自転車文化センター picture is a work of art above the threshold of originality. Then I will blur it. Keep until then. Thanks! Syced (talk) 13:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I guess nobody here (including me) pinged you so I'm doing it now. whym (talk) 09:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Whym, Piotrus, and Syced: I suppose photos of standard mannequins with monochromatic surfaces can stay, as the mannequins are based on humans and are not artistic. However, the clothes on them are artistic, and so are the posters. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- How come you see the clothes as artistic? They are utilitarian and historical, not fashion items. Posters, yes, those should be censored. Which images have posters that are not de minimis? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Whym, Piotrus, and Syced: I suppose photos of standard mannequins with monochromatic surfaces can stay, as the mannequins are based on humans and are not artistic. However, the clothes on them are artistic, and so are the posters. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Most, deleted the ones that had dioramas, animal models or other issues. Kept the ones that had manniquins with old clothing and so forth. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - 'Ginza Bricktown' model - detail 01 (15747635066).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - 'Ginza Bricktown' model - detail 02 (15585923248).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - 'Ginza Bricktown' model - detail 03 (15586174477).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - 'Ginza Bricktown' model - detail 04 (15586534080).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - 'Ginza Bricktown' model - detail 05 (15747633626).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - 'Ginza Bricktown' model - detail 06 (15151922553).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - 'Ginza Bricktown' model - detail 07 (15771329145).jpg
- File:Ginza Bricktown 1410.JPG
- File:Ginza Bricktown 1411.JPG
- File:Ginza Bricktown 1412.JPG
- File:Ginza Bricktown 1413.JPG
- File:Ginza Bricktown 1414.JPG
- File:Ginza Bricktown1.jpg
- File:Tokyo-edohakub-ginza.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- The question on this (and similar cases) is going to come down to:
- When was the model made?
- If recently enough to still be in copyright, is there enough in the model that is not simply faithful reproduction of what it represents to be copyrightable?
- - Jmabel ! talk 14:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like the creator of the model is not named. [4][5] Edo-Tokyo Museum opened around 1990.[6] It seems reasonable to assume that the model (which is permanently displayed) was created at the same time, commissioned by the museum. As for how much of it is a faithful reproduction of publid domain works, the buildings in it, assuming they were reproduction of real buildings, are likely to be public domain. However, the human figures and the carriages seem less likely. whym (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, model is very likely to have been created in the 1990s, which is too young to be PD in Japan. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 08:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:Architectural model of the area west of Ryogoku Bridge.jpg
- File:Area to the west of Ryogoku Bridge, late Edo period, scale 1 to 30 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06778.jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - detail of a model of the area west of Ryogoku Bridge in the 1830s - 01 (15771331605).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum-5.jpg
- File:Japan - Tokyo - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Diorama (4).jpg
- File:Japan - Tokyo - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Diorama (5).jpg
- File:Japan - Tokyo - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Diorama (6).jpg
- File:Tokyo-edohakub-ryogokubashi.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- The question on this (and similar cases) is going to come down to:
- When was the model made?
- If recently enough to still be in copyright, is there enough in the model that is not simply faithful reproduction of what it represents to be copyrightable?
- - Jmabel ! talk 14:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, model could very likely been created after the 1960s. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:Chonin area nihonbashi 1377.JPG
- File:Chonin area nihonbashi 1378.JPG
- File:Chonin area nihonbashi 1379.JPG
- File:Chonin area, Nihonbashi, 1 to 30 model - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06627.jpg
- File:Chonin area, Nihonbashi, 1 to 30 model - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06628.jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum-3.jpg
- File:Nihonbashi model.jpg
- File:江戸東京博物館.JPG
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- This applies to figures? Or models of buildings as well? And if you blurred the figures out? Gryffindor (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, model could very likely been created after the 1960s. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myodin procession model - detail 02 (15151920553).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 01 (15586172147).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 02 (15747631676).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 03 (15772890972).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 04 (15747715366).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 05 (15586170817).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 06 (15586530830).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 07 (15771326295).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 08 (15585918888).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 09 (15586530220).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 10 (15585499959).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 11 (15585499819).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 11 (15586529730).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Kanda Myojin procession model - detail 13 (15586168947).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- The question on this (and similar cases) is going to come down to when was the model made? In this case, the nature of what is being represented probably means that it is copyrightable. - Jmabel ! talk 14:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, model could very likely been created after the 1960s. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:Bookshop for light fiction and illustrations, modeled after the Kansen-do owned by Izumiya Ichibee, c. 1797 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06737.jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - lifesize replica of a bookshop of light fiction 01 (15769458811).jpg
- File:Shrine and well - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06727.jpg
- File:Split row house (munewari nagaya) - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06695.jpg
- File:Split row house (munewari nagaya), model of Late Edo period, scale 1 to 1 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06675.jpg
- File:Split row house (munewari nagaya), model of Late Edo period, scale 1 to 1 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06679.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Edo-Tokyo_Museum_-_Sumida,_Tokyo,_Japan_-_DSC06695.jpg){kind=link}
,_model_of_Late_Edo_period,_scale_1_to_1_-_Edo-Tokyo_Museum_-_Sumida,_Tokyo,_Japan_-_DSC06675.jpg){kind=link}
,_model_of_Late_Edo_period,_scale_1_to_1_-_Edo-Tokyo_Museum_-_Sumida,_Tokyo,_Japan_-_DSC06679.jpg){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- The question on this (and similar cases) is going to come down to:
- First, when was the model made?
- If recently enough to still be in copyright, is there enough in the model that is not simply either trivial, or faithful reproduction of what it represents, to be copyrightable?
- - Jmabel ! talk 14:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: procedurally kept. Seems to be a faithful reproduction. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png.
- File:2018-09-24 dolls of Maiko in Tokyo.jpg
- File:2018-09-24 Sukeroku diorama in the Edo-Tokyo Museum.jpg
- File:Edo-tokyo -Museum.JPG
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Lifesize diorama of kabuki play Sukeroki 01 (15151379484).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Lifesize diorama of kabuki play Sukeroki 02 (15151912093).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Lifesize diorama of kabuki play Sukeroki 03 (15772888212).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Lifesize diorama of kabuki play Sukeroki 04 (15769459291).jpg
- File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Lifesize diorama of kabuki play Sukeroki 05 (15771323185).jpg
- File:Sukeroku diorama in the Edo-Tokyo Museum.jpg
- File:Sukeroku on the kabuki stage, replica of late 1700s, scale 1 to 1 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06810.jpg
- File:Sukeroku on the kabuki stage, replica of late 1700s, scale 1 to 1 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06816.jpg
- File:Sukeroku on the kabuki stage, replica of late 1700s, scale 1 to 1 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06820.jpg
- File:Sukeroku on the kabuki stage, replica of late 1700s, scale 1 to 1 - Edo-Tokyo Museum - Sumida, Tokyo, Japan - DSC06822.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- The question on this (and similar cases) is going to come down to:
- When was the model made?
- If recently enough to still be in copyright:
- What is the Japanese status of clothing in terms of copyright, and is any of the clothing here recent enough for that to be an issue?
- is there enough in the model that is not simply clothing and minimal mannikins (not usually copyrightable, though I don't know about Japan) to be copyrightable?
- - Jmabel ! talk 14:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright in Japan was recently shortened.@Jmabel and Jeff G.: Stanislov Patrick 473 (talk) 12:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Although see your comment here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edo-Tokyo Museum - Lifesize diorama of kabuki play Sukeroki 01 (15151379484).jpg where you favour deleting just one of these (no reason given other than "copyright") Andy Dingley (talk) 13:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Shortened? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright in Japan was recently shortened.@Jmabel and Jeff G.: Stanislov Patrick 473 (talk) 12:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: The manniquins appear to be the focus of the photographs here, and the clothing seems to be old enough to be out of copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Flag is from 1989, not public domain in Australia yet. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Images uploaded by Zainul Abideen
[edit]- File:India Longest Tiranga Run by Zainul Abideen 01.png
- File:India Longest Tiranga Run by Zainul Abideen 02.png
- File:India Longest Tiranga Run by Zainul Abideen 03.png
- File:India Longest Tiranga Run by Zainul Abideen 04.png
- File:India Longest Tiranga Run by Zainul Abideen 05.png
These images are uploaded under the generic {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license. However, these images are from the Government of India (since "Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav" is a motto used by GOI) and GOI images are generally not free unless licensed under {{GODL}}. Since no evidence exists that these images are licensed under GODL, we should nuke them all. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 06:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm not sure these are actually GOI images; they look kind of amateur. However, I'm deleting them for COM:WEBHOST (out of scope). —holly {chat} 21:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Почти копия File:Larnaca-Municipality.jpg уже существующего. Формально разрешение хоть и больше, но качество почти такое же. TheVovaNik (talk) 12:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use together in ru:Ларнака. --Jcb (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 08:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted but set up a redirect to File:Larnaca-Municipality.jpg, which is essentially a duplicate of this (however, I nominated that one for deletion as a probably copyvio). —holly {chat} 21:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Not for the given reason, but for being an inferior copy of File:Flag of l’Île d’Olonne.svg. —holly {chat} 21:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Although Italy has a high TOO, this appears to be a photo of an embroidered patch, meaning that it's a photo of a 3D work and therefore has its own copyright. —holly {chat} 21:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is a poor-quality version of the shield portion of File:Provincia di Pavia-Stemma.svg in a rectangular shape. I have no idea if this "flag" was ever actually used, and it's possible this was downloaded from the web somewhere, but I think we can make a new version of this from the COA image and that would work as a replacement, if someone wants to tackle that. I might try it myself later. —holly {chat} 21:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I made a new version. —holly {chat} 00:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is File:Sestri Levante Coat of arms 2.png on a white rectangle which is then tied to a spear like a flag, so that would make the flag image a flag itself, which is weird. However, I don't see anything like it on the town's official website, so I have my doubts if it's actually a real thing. —holly {chat} 22:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- How does this file get copyrighted? Kreuzecharmeur (talk) 17:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
No proof of license has been given Dajasj (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Satoshi Tsuruoka
[edit]Probably a third party content that's not released under a free license. It is a crop of the profile image at https://web.archive.org/web/20230305100642/https://remax-web.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/tsuruoka_satoshi.pdf , so it's unlikely that the environment ministry has its copyright and the authority to release it under a free license.
- File:Satoshi Tsuruoka 20201203.png
- File:Satoshi Tsuruoka cropped 1 Satoshi Tsuruoka 20201203.png
- File:Satoshi Tsuruoka cropped 2 Satoshi Tsuruoka 20201203.png
- File:Satoshi Tsuruoka cropped 3 Satoshi Tsuruoka 20201203.png
whym (talk) 10:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
en:Made 4 Entertainment is twice deleted. Probably the organization and its logo are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Made 4 Entertainment is a division of w:Studio 100. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ikan Kekek. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Carte postale de la fin des années 1960, moins de 70 ans après la publication donc non libre de droit. H2O(talk) 12:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no evidence that points to the use of this flag by the Gendarmerie of Cambodia. LieutenantThanon (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that points to the use of this flag by the Cambodian Customs Office. LieutenantThanon (talk) 12:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that points to the use of this flag by the Postal service of Cambodia. LieutenantThanon (talk) 12:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Gavin Harlien
[edit]Although higher quality, this was found here https://www.thecheckeredflag.co.uk/2022/09/gavin-harlien-wins-sst-bristol-race-1/ before uploaded to Commons. Needs OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Why would this be up for deletion. Image was provided by the racing series to post and has full authority to post image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spdrcr19 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Info: Also found on twitter. --Achim55 (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)- You stated this is "Own work". Did you take it yourself with your own camera? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If actual evidence can be submitted that a valid licence has been granted, it can be undeleted. --Stifle (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing EXIF data, copyright violation existed on the original uploader User:Bdanh, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
If we look at this image (non-direct link), we can see in the bottom right it says "Nottingham Journal Ltd". Since this was published in 1936, COM:COMM UK states that this is IP of the commisioner (i.e., the Nottingham Journal). Since this is a company, it expires 70 years after publication, so it expired in 2006. However, this means URAA applies. Therefore, we must undelete on 2032 (95+1 pub) --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 16:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photograph (taken by the U.S State Department) contains a blown-up photograph on the right that probably was not created by the U.S. State Department. It could be de minimis as the photograph on right could be blurred and not lose much meaning. Dutch FoP doesn't cover indoor works. Abzeronow (talk) 16:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Looks de minimis to me as an important part of the picture is not visible and not the focus point of the photo. --Hannolans (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with Hannolans that this appears to be de minimis and not infringing per COM:DM Netherlands. Keep. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion and consensus. --Stifle (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 2000. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
The photograph of the room is freely licensed but FoP in the UK doesn't cover graphical works such as paintings and the Flickr uploader is not w:Sean Scully so we'd need VRT permission from Scully to host this here. Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
@792M@TKL.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
@792M@TKL.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photograph has an inappropriate software license. I left the uploader a message about three months ago about it and they didn't respond to it. Needs an appropriate license to remain on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
@792M@TKL.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
@792M@TKL.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Eric Duff as Logo Yann (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The logo had been uploaded here as part of a colaboration between WM Argentina and the C.A. Lanús in 2014 named "Editatón del Centenario del Club Atlético Lanús". Fma12 (talk) 12:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Moreover, a very similar version exists at least since 1932 (see this poster), licensed as {{PD-AR-Anonymous}}. There is also a post (here) made by the Lanús Musuem official account which added further information about the history of the emblem. Fma12 (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per FMA, logo appears to be public domain in Argentina and the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unofficial Flag of Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands.svg. This is a fantasy flag, not a real one, and should not be used in any article or treated as even "unofficial" since it's never been used in an actual capacity for these uninhabited islands. Reywas92 (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In Use. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Pseudaxine trachuri (Gastrocotylidae) Genital atrium and penis(Bouguerche, Gey, Tazerouti & Justine).png
[edit]_Genital_atrium_and_penis(Bouguerche,_Gey,_Tazerouti_%26_Justine).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Genital_atrium_and_penis(Bouguerche,_Gey,_Tazerouti_%26_Justine).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ya que es trabajo propio, pf suba un archivo más grande para ver mejor de que se trata 186.173.30.61 16:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: "Specimen mounted and photographed by Trabelssi Wahida and Haoua Yasmine." Needs VRT --Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Commons is not censored, so this instruction to censor certain images (so far exclusively applied to images of Muhammad, as far as I can see) is inappropriate. Further, when users view this image on aother wiki, it gives them specific instructions which may violate local policies - Commons should not include usage instructions which are not universally applicable. WJ94 (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: In use on 25 file pages. No censoring but providing a choice. --Achim55 (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: This template explains how users can hide the image for themselves, not censoring it for others. Also, I don't know what local policies you are refering to. As far as I know there are no policies that are being broken. --Rock3003 (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- This template does not explain how users can hide the image for themselves. It instructs users to please include
<div class="{{{code}}}">before the image and</div>after the image when adding the image to articles. The requirement to include such parameters on certain images (such as images of Muhammad) is a policy issue which should be decided by local wikis rather than a template placed on the image at Commons. For example, on the English Wikipedia, doing so may conflict with the no disclaimers guideline. I have no opinion on whether a parameter like this should be added to depictions of Muhammad, but whether or not that should be done ought to be a decision made by local communities and this template undermines that. WJ94 (talk) 15:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)- Your argument seems good to me, so I would tend to favor deletion, too, but maybe someone could explain how this template does not violate policies. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see this as being a disclaimer, it's instructions. And generally the disclaimer policy applies to articles, not pictures. Maybe it can be rewritten so that it be more optional. Instead of saying "please" it could say "you could". And adding a link to how users can use the code. --Rock3003 (talk) 09:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- This template does not explain how users can hide the image for themselves. It instructs users to please include
- Delete: Since this template mandates users to apply specific codes directly to the local wiki articles, this can't even be considered a disclaimer nor even a choice; once the code is applied directly to the article, it's there for everyone; and some random users have no right to dictate rules on local wikis, their communities should be the only ones in charge of these choices. I hence suggest to also delete the said code from all articles it has been added to. Daniele Fisichella 03:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- I tried to write "please" to make it clear that it's a choice. But maybe some cultures consider it a mendate when saying "please. So I edited the text to say "consider". --Rock3003 (talk) 22:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Not censored. Stifle (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: This template doesn't mandate anything; it's merely instructions. Wiki editors are free to ignore if they want. —holly {chat} 16:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Fantasy design that has never been used or adopted in any form. It has no educational value and should not be used in any article. Calling it "unofficial" is stretching the truth, which should be for things widely used but not adopted by law. I can't just make up random flags and expect them to be used just because there's a disclaimer that it's "unofficial"! Reywas92 (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep As per 1, 2 & 3, the designer was a member of the Fish & Wildlife Service, which oversees the islands. They were not just a random person, but someone who is part of the authority maintaining the islands. I think the name of the file containing "Unofficial" and the use of Template:fictional flag is enough to signify the file's unofficiality. No Lives Left ⸞NᴇᴡTᴀʟᴋ⸟ 04:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- So what? Just because he's an employee means NOTHING. I work for a state government agency, and we don't have a flag, but that doesn't mean I can just make one up for the agency or anything we oversee and pretend it should be used or even merely called "unofficial." The source even says "Actually a well thought out and simple plan and although everyone in his office was supportive of his design his boss thought it was a waste of time and the flag design came to an end. The designer was with the Fish and Wildlife service his name was either Mark or Mike." Even if my colleages support me, I'm still just a random person with no authority unless someone higher up approves it. The FWS is huge, and we don't even know who this is or if his job had anything to do with these islands – it's still just a fantasy design that has not been recognized or used in an appropriately relevant fashion. Again, this has no educational purpose and should never be used on any Wiki project, misleadingly suggesting it's used or recognized, so it should be deleted. Reywas92 (talk) 23:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Would a rename to that specifies that this file is the flag used at the USS Arizona Memorial suffice as a compromise? Moving it to File:USS Arizona Memorial flag for Howland–Baker–Jarvis, File:Flag used for Howland–Baker–Jarvis at USS Arizona Memorial, or something similar would allow it to be used in the context of the memorial but is enough to show the flag isn't very widespread in use elsewhere. 149.75.65.56 05:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Um, when was this used at the Arizona Memorial??? Reywas92 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- It wasn't used at the memorial, but as per fotw, the flag was made mostly to be added to digital archives. It was originally approved to be released as the unofficial flag and going to be announced, but the announcement was cancelled because they thought making an announcement for something unofficial didn't make much sense. If anything, a move to "proposed flag for Howland–Baker–Jarvis" might make more sense. I think the filename containing "unofficial" or "proposed" in addition to the existing Template:fictional flag is enough to specify that the flag isn't official without needing to delete the file or add more unnecessary text to the file's description (as Reywas92 has). No Lives Left ⸞NᴇᴡTᴀʟᴋ⸟ 00:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Right, that doesn't "make much sense". I like flags as much as the next guy, but fantasy proposals fail Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. And that link is for Kingman, not this design. Reywas92 (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- I must add that the flags were not used in the memorial as it is explained in the 208th Release of NAVA News: "Three other islands in the Pacific are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Baker, Howland, and Jarvis Islands were supposed to have a flag designed, but as far as I know, that never happened. I used the current Dept. of Interior flag to represent those three islands." Nevertheless, the article also shows how the designs for the other territories were actually made into real flags. Follow-up on the unofficial design for Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands was then provided by the same author on FOTW. I believe the best course of action to settle the debate would be to contact Skip Wheeler and ask if these flag design was ever printed or used, and if there is evidence of such use. Germenfer (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Again, I cannot emphasize enough: this is not a real flag, it has never been recognized or flown in any sanctioned capacity, and it should never be presented with any legitimacy whatsoever. A flag enthusiast was in correspondence with the person who made it up and with the FOTW website, but that does not mean it has educational value or should be used on Wiki projects. I cannot find anything else about Skip Wheeler online so that may be difficult and unreliable, but even if he had it printed, it has no proper use on Wiki. Reywas92 (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know if Vexilla Mundi is a reliable source or not. Tell me. IAmNotABananaaa (talk) 01:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- BTW, we allow unofficial flags here, especially this file; File:Unofficial Flag of Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands.svg IAmNotABananaaa (talk) 01:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know if Vexilla Mundi is a reliable source or not. Tell me. IAmNotABananaaa (talk) 01:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Again, I cannot emphasize enough: this is not a real flag, it has never been recognized or flown in any sanctioned capacity, and it should never be presented with any legitimacy whatsoever. A flag enthusiast was in correspondence with the person who made it up and with the FOTW website, but that does not mean it has educational value or should be used on Wiki projects. I cannot find anything else about Skip Wheeler online so that may be difficult and unreliable, but even if he had it printed, it has no proper use on Wiki. Reywas92 (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- I must add that the flags were not used in the memorial as it is explained in the 208th Release of NAVA News: "Three other islands in the Pacific are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Baker, Howland, and Jarvis Islands were supposed to have a flag designed, but as far as I know, that never happened. I used the current Dept. of Interior flag to represent those three islands." Nevertheless, the article also shows how the designs for the other territories were actually made into real flags. Follow-up on the unofficial design for Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands was then provided by the same author on FOTW. I believe the best course of action to settle the debate would be to contact Skip Wheeler and ask if these flag design was ever printed or used, and if there is evidence of such use. Germenfer (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Right, that doesn't "make much sense". I like flags as much as the next guy, but fantasy proposals fail Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. And that link is for Kingman, not this design. Reywas92 (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- It wasn't used at the memorial, but as per fotw, the flag was made mostly to be added to digital archives. It was originally approved to be released as the unofficial flag and going to be announced, but the announcement was cancelled because they thought making an announcement for something unofficial didn't make much sense. If anything, a move to "proposed flag for Howland–Baker–Jarvis" might make more sense. I think the filename containing "unofficial" or "proposed" in addition to the existing Template:fictional flag is enough to specify that the flag isn't official without needing to delete the file or add more unnecessary text to the file's description (as Reywas92 has). No Lives Left ⸞NᴇᴡTᴀʟᴋ⸟ 00:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Um, when was this used at the Arizona Memorial??? Reywas92 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Would a rename to that specifies that this file is the flag used at the USS Arizona Memorial suffice as a compromise? Moving it to File:USS Arizona Memorial flag for Howland–Baker–Jarvis, File:Flag used for Howland–Baker–Jarvis at USS Arizona Memorial, or something similar would allow it to be used in the context of the memorial but is enough to show the flag isn't very widespread in use elsewhere. 149.75.65.56 05:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- So what? Just because he's an employee means NOTHING. I work for a state government agency, and we don't have a flag, but that doesn't mean I can just make one up for the agency or anything we oversee and pretend it should be used or even merely called "unofficial." The source even says "Actually a well thought out and simple plan and although everyone in his office was supportive of his design his boss thought it was a waste of time and the flag design came to an end. The designer was with the Fish and Wildlife service his name was either Mark or Mike." Even if my colleages support me, I'm still just a random person with no authority unless someone higher up approves it. The FWS is huge, and we don't even know who this is or if his job had anything to do with these islands – it's still just a fantasy design that has not been recognized or used in an appropriately relevant fashion. Again, this has no educational purpose and should never be used on any Wiki project, misleadingly suggesting it's used or recognized, so it should be deleted. Reywas92 (talk) 23:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In Use currently. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unofficial Flag of Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands.svg. This is a fantasy flag, not a real one, and should not be used in any article or treated as even "unofficial" since it's never been used in an actual capacity for these uninhabited islands. Reywas92 (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
there are no evidences to prove this photo was taken by Mehr News Agency. it is a photo used by Mehr and not taken by that website. NameGame (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Do you have any information to the contrary? The image appears to be solely hosted on Iranian sites, and is clearly posted at Mehr news which declares all of its content to be "licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." Prove otherwise. Aetius (talk) 08:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- they only own the pictures of themselves which have been taken by their photographers and they prove it by watermarking photographers' name on images. I am a native Persian and as I read it, that page has not been written about owning this image by Mehr News or at least one of their photographers.
- These below listed websites have used this image as "Mehr News" does:
- & if you do search his name in his native language, (Arabic: خضر عدنان), you will be viewing more of this used image. NameGame (talk) 01:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per Mehr_News_Agency#International_cooperation, the agency has multiple international cooperation agreements in place which would surely not be tenable if the website made a habit of putting others' images under their own CC4.0 license. Onceinawhile (talk) 09:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- I dont think this is taken by Mehr, this seems to be a screengrab from some network. An Israeli paper uses it and attributes it to "Arab networks" (here). In fact I dont think you should be using images from Mehr at all, they use images without attribution they clearly did not take. Like here (with the UN logo still on it and not cropped out). In sum, delete as being from unknown provenance with a shaky claim by the supposed CC licensor to actually own the content. Nableezy (talk)
Deleted: Per nomination and discussion. Iranian news agency photos are only reliable <with free licences> when they have the watermark of the agency and the name of the photographer on the photo itself. We have a consensus for Tasnim which was the pioneer at Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Tasnim News Agency. --Ellywa (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Difference between this and File:Bandeira municipal de Lisboa.png or File:Flagge der Rußlanddeutschen von Siedlungsgebiet Moskau.jpg? Just asking. Delfort (talk) 09:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy gives government works 20 years of protection before they enter PD. This city logo design has existed since at least 21 years ago, so by now, the logo design should already be part of PD. 痛Designism (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Has this logo existed since the 1970s? It appears to be public domain in Italy, but what about the US? Abzeronow (talk) 16:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Comment The shield used in the centre was speedily-deleted by Yann on May 1st, and the copyright claim status of the composite flag should clearly follow that of the shield. So the first question would be whether that was freely drawn up from a blazon, and if not, what precise image it would have been derivative of. But if the coat of arms stays deleted, then would be silly to keep the flag. Felix QW (talk) 20:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Felix. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unofficial Flag of Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands.svg. This is a fantasy flag, not a real one, and should not be used in any article or treated as even "unofficial" since it's never been used in an actual capacity for these uninhabited islands. Reywas92 (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- No! This may be unofficial, but it is not fake. It has been recorded on the website of FOTW. 170.235.204.49 16:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- And I would be very happy to decline that if I was an administrator. 170.235.204.49 16:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- FOTW isn't a reliable source. Again, I cannot emphasize enough: this isn't a real flag, it has never been recognized or flown in any sanctioned capacity, and it should never be presented with any legitimacy whatsoever. A flag enthusiast was in correspondence with the person who made it up and with the FOTW website, but that doesn't mean it has educational value or should be used on Wiki projects. Reywas92 (talk) 03:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- but I saw it on a YouTube video and it was rare though. 170.235.204.49 14:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Plus, this original flag on FOTW was actually made by Skip Wheeler. 170.235.204.49 14:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- and why only FOTW? It should be kept on Wikimedia what do you mean. 170.235.204.49 14:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Plus, this original flag on FOTW was actually made by Skip Wheeler. 170.235.204.49 14:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- but I saw it on a YouTube video and it was rare though. 170.235.204.49 14:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maps of A Song of Ice and Fire
[edit]- File:Crown Lands, The Seven Kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:Dorne, The Seven Kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:Game of Thrones Complete Map.png
- File:Game of Thrones World Map and Cities.png
- File:Game of Thrones World Map.png
- File:Game of throwns new7 one layer.svg
- File:Map of Essos.png
- File:Map of Known World He.png
- File:Map of Known World.png
- File:Map of Known World.svg
- File:Map of main houses of Westeros He.png
- File:Map of Westeros.png
- File:Map of Westeros.svg
- File:Riverlands, The Seven Kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:Seacht Ríocht Iartharais.png
- File:Stormlands, The Seven Kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:The Iron Islands, Westeros.png
- File:The North, The Seven Kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:The Reach, The Seven Kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:The Seven Kingdoms Location.svg
- File:The Vale, The Seven Kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:The West, The Seven kingdoms, Westeros.png
- File:Vestero Esperanta.png
- File:Westeros Location.svg
- File:WESTEROS.tif
According to Commons:Fan Art § Re-drawing does not avoid copyright infringement,
It is important to understand that you do not avoid copyright infringement merely by re-drawing an existing copyright work, even if you introduce artistic additions or embellishments of your own. For example, if you redraw the map illustrations depicted in the novel The Lord of the Rings you infringe their copyright just as certainly as if you had photocopied them.
These maps listed here are maps of A Song of Ice and Fire / Game of Thrones. --痛Designism (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: In most jurisdictions, re-drawing does avoid copyright infringement, but yeah, most doesn't mean all. That's fair use, IMHO... anyway, if they're found uneligible, I would suggest to move these valutable files to en.wiki instead of completely losing them. Est. 2021 (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Fair use has never been allowed on Commons. But yeah, I do think there's value in moving the files to Enwiki.--痛Designism (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note that most of these pictures are from A Wiki of Ice and Fire, where they are licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. In addition, since you shared a quote about The Lord of the Rings, note that Commons already hosts hundreds of maps of fictional places, including maps of Middle-earth. Est. 2021 (talk) 13:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Uploading from that Wiki is effectively Commons:License laundering. And yes, those suspicious fiction maps based on fictional worlds should also be removed. --痛Designism (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep At least for some of them. To my knowledge redrawing, recreating or drawing alike (in particular of 2d) is not a copyright violation in general as pointed out above. I'm not sure whether it makes sense to require it not being an potential infringement in any conceivable jurisdiction. In other cases Commons usually keeps everything which is at least not an infringement with a warning label of jurisdiction that differ. Also it seems to me instead of list this needs to be done on a case by case basis. The redrawing/recreating issue is completely different from the license laundering issue. The latter requires no deletion but just an according adjustment of the licenses.Kmhkmh (talk) 04:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- "redrawing, recreating or drawing alike (in particular of 2d) is not a copyright violation in general" it depends on the fidelity and local law. Tracing images with pencil in a library might be ok, but making a detailed SVG map is beyond innocent for me. -- 痛Designism (talk) 22:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with "innocence" or supposed "bad intent" or whatever, but that is many jurisdictions such 2D reproductions are not a copyright infringement (and not everybody reads all commons policies before uploading something he assumes to be appropriate anyhow). Now if all of these maps indeed seem to be reproductions or are based on reproductions of a drawing that was published elsewhere under a share alike licence, then imho easiest and least disruptive solution is to adjust the licences accordingly here. I don't really see a reason for deleting anything.--Kmhkmh (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- "redrawing, recreating or drawing alike (in particular of 2d) is not a copyright violation in general" it depends on the fidelity and local law. Tracing images with pencil in a library might be ok, but making a detailed SVG map is beyond innocent for me. -- 痛Designism (talk) 22:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. These maps are clearly derivative works. Perhaps this is allowed in some jurisdictions, but according to the Commons policies, these works are not accepted per COM:Derivative works. These maps could be based on https://quartermaester.info/ where it is stated (please press the "i" for information) Intellectual property of A Song of Ice and Fire, this map and all locations belong to George R.R. Martin. The maps might also be derived from the book The Lands of Ice and Fire (A Game of Thrones), which is copyrighted as well. Consequently, these files have to be deleted imho. Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Ellywa, these are deriative works of copyrighted material by George R. R. Martin. Permission from Martin would be needed to host these here. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)