Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_came_to_Bremen_on_the_1st_May_1933._Maybe_thats_why_the_tram_is_decorated._(48043008528).jpg){kind=link}
,_Taipei.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
The person in the image doesn't want this image on the air. Burjuvaw (talk) 01:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal image by non-contributor. --Wutsje 05:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
The person in the image doesn't want this image on the air. Burjuvaw (talk) 02:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal image by non-contributor. --Wutsje 05:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luca Dell'Orto as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Image that exceed the threshold of originality. This is such strange font. The fonts are not copyrightable in USA, but Edmonton is in Canada. I do not remember law of Canada so well and I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks for opening this thread, I am the uploader of the file. I'm not sure if it's a font or something someone designed because it's so complex and, because of that, it includes parts that are really hard to digitally recreate into a font. For the doubt about the copyright law, I want to specify that the image is taken from the cover of a studio album released worldwide. cover Luca Dell'Orto (talk) 13:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept, I was confused due to the word "Edmonton". Author en:Serj Tankian is an American musician and US law applies. Per {{PD-font}} the file is ineligible for copyright. I'll fix the license. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a TV still. Uploader has uploaded publicity stills as own work, so the "own work" claim here may not be deliberate. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gamingplay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparently fictional flags and anthems for the "Republic of Erlande", "Ukissland" and "Ukrainia 9rd empire". Files are unused, and out of COM:SCOPE as a personal fiction project.
- File:Ukissland Germany flag.png
- File:Ukissland logo socialism Erlandese 1924-1979.png
- File:Ukrainia 9rd empire state 1925-1979.mid
- File:9rd Empire ) Ukissland union.png
- File:Przeworska Erlande Republic song.mid
- File:The symbol shield.png
- File:Republic of Erlande.png
_Ukissland_union.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all files by the user deleted as copyvio and out of scope. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gamingplay (talk · contribs)
[edit]More flags and maps of apparently fictional countries, and Polandball style cartoons of those fictional flags. Out of COM:SCOPE with no educational use.
- File:How many States for Erlande geography.jpg
- File:Ukissland 9rd empire state.png
- File:Ukissland union vs Soviet union.png
- File:Erlande Fuck Ukraine sexual 1992.png
- File:Erlande fucking Ukraine image ??.png
- File:Test 1 Flag Ukissland.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Adding File:Empire all Erlandese.png which has the explanatory category "Category:Erlande Republic is just not normal with it's just a stupid joke about making a critical comic in killing killing every millions of people and get a sort of revolution" --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all files by the user deleted as copyvio and out of scope. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
no source given Hoyanova (talk) 22:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by علاء at 13:16, 11 April 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
b nbnbn bnbnhggh 89.235.213.243 15:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- I don't read Japanese, so I can't assess the usefulness of the page. However the "reason" for deletion looks like nonsense in any language. Unless some reason for deletion is offered, Keep -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - speedy. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Closed. Vandalism deletion request, thats the ja Commons:Community portal, linked on any page on the left side in the Navigation links. --Martin H. (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
www.paparazo.com.br 186.208.200.1 23:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: speedy --moogsi (blah) 16:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Closed, nonsense. --Martin H. (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hoshikawa st.jpg Hama2222002 (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: no reason given Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment "Welcome to "Wikimedia Commons Community Portal" - could someone who reads Japanese please take a look at this to see if it seems clearly within scope or not? Thanks, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: This is the Japanese language translation of Commons:Community portal. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 18:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Obviously taken from https://www.evelynwaugh.org.uk/styled-130/index.html. Credited to 'Arthur Pickett' and admittedly taken from a guidebook bought by the website creator in 2007. DrKay (talk) 07:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- The portrait scanned would be out of copyright, thus no new claim created for the guide book. Problem is the low quality --Zenwort (talk) 21:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Batch of low quality images uploaded by a sock of A3cb1. Ruthven (msg) 19:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted at source. Artist died in 1955 and so copyrighted in the country of origin until 2025. Obviously not a photograph and obviously is a painting so does not meet the conditions for UK-Gov. DrKay (talk) 07:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 18:59, 15 April 2022 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Miss Mattërn --Krdbot 01:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unclear copyright status: authr unknown and no evidence that it was published more than 70 years ago. Also likely URAA pronlem. Sugesting undelete in 2056 (120 years after creation) and delete per COM:PCP. Ankry (talk) 08:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Cyclopropanecarbaldehyde-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arjmandi.mohammad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arjmandi.mohammad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtful own work. Bunch of different cameras and varying sizes/ File:Dr._Shakibaei_Clinic1.jpg states "FarbodJafarpourPhotography" to be the author.
- File:Dr.shakibaei in school of dentistry michigan.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei.jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaei Penn Dental Medicine.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Conference (3).jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaei carl zeiss dental academy symposium.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei (2).jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Conference (2).jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaie carl zeiss dental academy symposium micro dentistry and micro surgery specialist.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Clinic1.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Conference.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Clinic.jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaei microVision congress.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2019, European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED), Munich, Germany.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2017, presenting at WAUPS International Conference, New Delhi, India.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2018, presenting at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2014, presenting at AMED International Meeting, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2018, presenting at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2010, receiving The German Periodontology Award, Bonn, Germany.jpg
- File:Dr.Shakibaie.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2017, conducting practical course of Zeiss Dental Academy, Istanbul, Turkey.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 1998, Dentistry Graduation, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Munich,_Germany.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- also of doubtful SCOPE Zenwort (talk) 21:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
User credits this as their own work, however, copyright belongs to RCA UK and its photographers. 2601:19C:4801:D0B0:8C42:C920:6CF3:566A 00:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Agree
Delete Zenwort (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Agree
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. The uploader is not the photographer. Unfree file. The uncropped original has a copyright stamp on it. Schwede66 02:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nadia Ait Mouh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Varying sizes, no EXIF. Doubtful own work.
- File:نادية ايت موح ممثلة.jpg
- File:نادية ايت موح ممثلة مغربية.jpg
- File:نادية ايت موح.jpg
- File:ممثلة مغربية.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:PARTYPICS VScode fanboy (talk) 07:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Commons is not your personal free web host. Also affected:
- because Jacen Moore = Bennydadawg = Bennnett edggno. No useful contributions to any wm projects treating them as some kind of playground. --Achim55 (talk) 16:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 00:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Faked image: putting a public figure's head on a topless woman's body. Auntof6 (talk) 08:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Logos not in PD HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Agree Delete Zenwort (talk) 21:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felix Neuscheler (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos uploaded by a blocked user.
- File:FN (Girls & Boys).png
- File:FN (Splash).png
- File:FN (Slimer).png
- File:FN (Schleife).png
- File:FN (Universal).png
- File:FN (Marshmello).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 10:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete. RZuo (talk) 14:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hitman_2015.jpg Λeternus (talk) 10:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Agree Delete Zenwort (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Georgenhausen (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; artist Ebbe Weiss-Weingart died in 2019.
- File:2018 Ebbe Weiss Weingart 05.jpg
- File:2018 Ebbe Weiss Weingart 04.jpg
- File:2018 Ebbe Weiss Weingart 02.jpg
- File:2018 Ebbe Weiss Weingart 01.jpg
- File:2018 Ebbe Weiss Weingart 03.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mariam skhiladzee (talk · contribs)
[edit]please use COM:RELGEN to confirm your ownership of copyright.
- File:Kjsdkabsssssssssssssssssssssssscccccccccccccccccccccc.jpg
- File:ფოტოზე ასახულია ბაია აბულაძე.jpg found in https://www.winefaresf.com/baia-abuladze-baias-wine
- File:არავინ.jpg from facebook
RZuo (talk) 11:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image with no apparent educational value. Fails COM:SCOPE. Note also the metadata "Author Niels Blekemolen" which makes this a likely copyvio. De728631 (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- everything from https://www.maak-law.com/attorneys-netherlands-2/ . RZuo (talk) 16:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per RZuo, a simple-to-detect copyvio. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- They could be the same person, of course (user names need not match real names), or it could be the all too common problem of leaving "own work " checked in the upload wizard. Regardless, COM:VRT verification is needed for the file to be kept. –LPfi (talk) 09:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
"al rights reserved" in exif data Xocolatl (talk) 17:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. 21st century Iranian publication HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Word salad from an inactive w:wp:NOTHERE user Dronebogus (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't really show anything. Furtermore appears to be a scan from a magazine. Copyvio???? 62.216.210.62 20:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Zenwort (talk) 20:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Porque sí Sinsentido Erick.chachi (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- This image is used within a VideoWiki effort. Specifically instructions on how to do pelvic binding.
- Anyway if the Commons community is not interested in this effort, we can move everything to our wikis. Unfortunately that would make it difficult to create these videos in other languages.
- Best Keep Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- “Porque sí Sinsentido” what is the reasoning? what has been understood? Keep --Zenwort (talk) 20:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gopinath Coach (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam/Out of scope
- File:Gopinath Coach.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 34.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 33.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 32.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 31.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 30.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 29.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 28.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 27.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 25.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 26.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 24.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 23.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 22.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 21.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 19.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 20.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 16.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 18.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 17.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 13.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 15.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 14.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 12.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 11.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 10.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 08.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 09.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 07.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 06.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 05.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 04.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 01.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 02.jpg
- File:Gopinath Coach 03.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:राजेंद्र आर्लेकर.jpg
- File:Maharaj Mandir.jpg
- File:Balajitemple.jpg
- File:Ausaforttopview.jpg
- File:Ausafort.jpg
- File:GECA on diamond jubilee.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
complex logos. might exceed COM:TOO.
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, तिरुचिरापल्ली.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, सिरमौर.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, संबलपूर.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, शिलाँग.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, रोहतक.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, रांची.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, रायपूर.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, नागपूर.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, लखनौ.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, कोळिकोड.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, काशीपूर.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, इंदोर.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, बोधगया.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, अमृतसर.png
- File:भारतीय व्यवस्थापन संस्था, कलकत्ता.png
RZuo (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
The previous version was a copyvio and so uploader uploaded a completely different picture which is still a copvio since, from https://www.aph.gov.au/Help/Disclaimer_Privacy_Copyright#c: almost all materials are released under CC-BY-NC, unsuitable for Commons Twotwofourtysix (talk) 03:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:TOYS 219.78.155.102 04:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted posters TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Looks to be a team profile photo. Sourcing says it comes from the team (Toronto FC). Likely not a free license RedPatch (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Not own work - tineye https://tineye.com/search/ee8520bb615341e1ee5f5237781faaca833cfeda Nutshinou Talk! 19:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Personal image manipulation with no educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Zenwort (talk) 20:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photography of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
photograph of copyrighted artwork MassiveEartha (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Zenwort (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mdy66 (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Even if you are copyright owner. Sorry, but CC licenses are irrevocable. --Zenwort (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log data. --Wdwd (talk) 11:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
"all rights reserved" in exif data Xocolatl (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Poor resolution 2600:100C:A204:99B3:D557:43BC:7FB8:6206 17:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Better than nothing. Deisenbe (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, not a valid deletion rationale. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Oppose No better equivalent --Milićević (talk) 10:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
copyvio; pd in 2081; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Cleary FoP Germany. Permanent and in a publicly accessible place (church). --Zenwort (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (No FoP because indoor). --Wdwd (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Im polash i want to deleted 103.230.105.58 17:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Even if you are copyright owner. Sorry, but CC licenses are irrevocable --20:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Zenwort (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 17:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing license. --Wdwd (talk) 11:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing license. --Wdwd (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
the terms on the website are not like a license cc-by-2.5. 91.193.179.217 18:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- “the terms on the website are not like a license cc-by-2.5” no they go even further, almost copyleft, thus Keep --Zenwort (talk) 20:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: No cc-by-2.5 license at the source. Source dos not allow commercial redustributuion (it is more like a cc-by-nc version, not copyleft) -> license review failed, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Author Rosa Frank 191.126.26.159 18:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
This is neither flag nor coat of arms of Lima. Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused & out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect upload (needs to be svg) Schoeberleis (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- “Incorrect upload (needs to be svg)” noit a valid reason for deletion Keep Zenwort (talk) 20:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
low quality, not useful. Xocolatl (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- right. delete it Triplec85 (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Zenwort (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as no permission (No permission since) Richard Huber (talk) 20:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Die Beschreibung der Geschichte der Kirche war ein öffentlicher Aushang vor dem Kirchengebäude.--Richard Huber (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (missing permission). --Wdwd (talk) 11:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
File desc gives author credit which differs to uploader - no evidence (nor claim) that uploader is the same person and no evidence that uploader has permission to release as CC 2A00:23C4:9315:CB01:C901:E68D:9B51:D6BA 20:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
No educational use, unidentified spreadsheet CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per COM:PCP; low-res, likely copyright violations uploaded by a spammer. File:Teach-yourself-guitar.png appears to be from https://depositphotos.com/4223753/stock-photo-play-guitar.html. TinEye indicates that File:Cleanup-Registry.png is a stock photo from Adobe, but the link has since died.
Sunmist (talk) 21:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CartoonNetworkUS, fictional logos by a user already blocked for socking on enwiki. The modified Tesla logo here appears to be the uploader's own design.
- File:Tesla Industries.png
- File:Kayo Landscape billboard.jpg
- File:Kayo Automotive.png
- File:Kayo Automotive logo.png
- File:Ladlecoin.png
- File:Hometown Party.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
No educational use, unidentified spreadsheet CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
No educational use, unidentified spreadsheet CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Peter Hebblethwaite, Chief Executive of P&O Ferries, speaking to a parliamentary committee.png
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as no permission (No permission since). OPL disputed, please discuss. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as I uploaded this screenshot under the false belief that it was allowed under the Open Parliament Licence. I stand corrected, permission is required from the Parliamentary Recording Unit. I could contact the Unit and request permission, however I would prefer that the file be deleted instead.--ThatRandomGuy1 (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
CPanel is non-free software, and screenshots of it will also be non-free. Sunmist (talk) 23:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- How about fa.wikipedia.org? Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 04:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama for monuments in Russia. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Что не так??? Это реально моя фотка — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artem7154 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с w:ru:Свобода панорамы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- “It shall be allowed to freely use, ... works of architecture, of urban development, and works of garden and landscape design, which are situated in places open for free attendance or visible from that places.” I'd see it as urban development, as Soviet war memorials were integral parts of every city. --Zenwort (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please read Civil Code of Russia carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- “It shall be allowed to freely use, ... works of architecture, of urban development, and works of garden and landscape design, which are situated in places open for free attendance or visible from that places.” I'd see it as urban development, as Soviet war memorials were integral parts of every city. --Zenwort (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с w:ru:Свобода панорамы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
kein Bild Mike Krüger (talk) 15:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep no reason for deletion. Mosbatho (talk) 16:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
„Privatbesitz eines Mitarbeiters des Entwicklerteams“ means that Mr. Galenko is thecreator of this image? Then, a sufficient permission for a CC license is needed otherwise it is a copyright violation. 2A02:810D:4AC0:1CB4:55AC:E814:BEBD:E349 15:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- needs ticket Zenwort (talk) 21:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Andrej Galenko war viele Jahre einer der Direktoren der nach der Auflösung der Sowjetunion privatisierten Firma JOINT STOCK COMPANY ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH CENTER «TEMP», später deren Generaldirektor. Das Bild ist aus seinem Privatbestand. Vergleichbare Aufnahmen finden sich auch auf der Webseite der Firma https://enc-temp.com/istoriya.
- Ich habe nach Rückfrage bei Herrn Galenko die Quellenangabe entsprechend korrigiert. Sein Einverständnis zur Veröffentlichung hat er noch einmal ausdrücklich erklärt.
- Ich hoffe, das ist nun ausreichend und bitte anderenfalls um entsprechende Hinweise. Andreas2901 (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. @Andreas2901: Please follow Commons:Volunteer Response Team. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
„Privatbesitz eines Mitarbeiters des Entwicklerteams“ means that Mr. Galenko is thecreator of this image? Then, a sufficient permission for a CC license is needed otherwise it is a copyright violation. 2A02:810D:4AC0:1CB4:55AC:E814:BEBD:E349 15:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Andrej Galenko war viele Jahre einer der Direktoren der nach der Auflösung der Sowjetunion privatisierten Firma JOINT STOCK COMPANY ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH CENTER «TEMP», später deren Generaldirektor. Das Bild ist aus seinem Privatbestand. Vergleichbare Aufnahmen finden sich auch auf der Webseite der Firma https://enc-temp.com/istoriya.
- Ich habe nach Rückfrage bei Herrn Galenko die Quellenangabe entsprechend korrigiert. Sein Einverständnis zur Veröffentlichung hat er noch einmal ausdrücklich erklärt.
- Ich hoffe, das ist nun ausreichend und bitte anderenfalls um entsprechende Hinweise. Andreas2901 (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. @Andreas2901: Please follow Commons:Volunteer Response Team. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
„Privatbesitz eines Mitarbeiters des Entwicklerteams“ means that Mr. Galenko is thecreator of this image? Then, a sufficient permission for a CC license is needed otherwise it is a copyright violation. 2A02:810D:4AC0:1CB4:55AC:E814:BEBD:E349 15:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Andrej Galenko war viele Jahre einer der Direktoren der nach der Auflösung der Sowjetunion privatisierten Firma JOINT STOCK COMPANY ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH CENTER «TEMP», später deren Generaldirektor. Das Bild ist aus seinem Privatbestand. Vergleichbare Aufnahmen finden sich auch auf der Webseite der Firma https://enc-temp.com/istoriya.
- Ich habe nach Rückfrage bei Herrn Galenko die Quellenangabe entsprechend korrigiert. Sein Einverständnis zur Veröffentlichung hat er noch einmal ausdrücklich erklärt.
- Ich hoffe, das ist nun ausreichend und bitte anderenfalls um entsprechende Hinweise. Andreas2901 (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. @Andreas2901: Please follow Commons:Volunteer Response Team. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
„Privatbesitz eines Mitarbeiters des Entwicklerteams“ means that Mr. Galenko is thecreator of this image? Then, a sufficient permission for a CC license is needed otherwise it is a copyright violation. 2A02:810D:4AC0:1CB4:55AC:E814:BEBD:E349 15:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- needs ticket Zenwort (talk) 21:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Andrej Galenko war viele Jahre einer der Direktoren der nach der Auflösung der Sowjetunion privatisierten Firma JOINT STOCK COMPANY ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH CENTER «TEMP», später deren Generaldirektor. Das Bild ist aus seinem Privatbestand. Vergleichbare Aufnahmen finden sich auch auf der Webseite der Firma https://enc-temp.com/istoriya.
- Ich habe nach Rückfrage bei Herrn Galenko die Quellenangabe entsprechend korrigiert. Sein Einverständnis zur Veröffentlichung hat er noch einmal ausdrücklich erklärt.
- Ich hoffe, das ist nun ausreichend und bitte anderenfalls um entsprechende Hinweise. Andreas2901 (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. @Andreas2901: Please follow Commons:Volunteer Response Team. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Charles H King Banjo Master.jpg - higher resolution scan of the same original, but with Getty Images watermarking. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mdy66 (talk) 16:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Even if you are copyright owner. Sorry, but CC licenses are irrevocable. Zenwort (talk) 21:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see deletion log. --Wdwd (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
According to this page, this sculpture is a work of en:Ira von Fürstenberg who is still alive. This was also temporarily exhibited in New York which has no Commons-applicable COM:FOP provisions for sculptures, per COM:FOP US. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 16:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
This image is redundant and of bad quality. An image of the same subject already exists. It is called File:Reverse of a Samnite coin.jpg. This image is just the other image but smaller and of lower quality. Ewf9h-bg (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
wrong date. copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Фотография "На раскопках" из фотоальбома С.Д.Васильева, внуком которого я являюсь. Сканирование фотографии произвел я. При загрузке файла в хранилище я указал дату загрузки. Михаил Ткачук (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Certainly wrong license, if 1960s in copyright, needs ticket. --Zenwort (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
license out of phantasie, photo of a photo; own work (but from a website or printed matter) :-( Mateus2019 (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Cant quite follow the reasoning of Mateus2019, but low quality and doubtful importance of person depicted. --Zenwort (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo/out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Zeppelin LZ-127 (Graf Zeppelin) came to Bremen on the 1st May 1933. Maybe thats why the tram is decorated. (48043008528).jpg
[edit]_came_to_Bremen_on_the_1st_May_1933._Maybe_thats_why_the_tram_is_decorated._(48043008528).jpg){kind=link}
_came_to_Bremen_on_the_1st_May_1933._Maybe_thats_why_the_tram_is_decorated._(48043008528).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photograph was taken in Bremen, Germany, so PD-UK couldn't be applied tho this photograph 79.145.148.64 15:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" is the correct license. --RAN (talk) 01:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kript im Bürgersaal München
[edit]copyvio, artist died in 1997; no fop.
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep permanently on display in publicly accessible place [church). Clearly FoP-Germany --Zenwort (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Facebook 191.126.26.159 12:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: There is no actual reason for nomination here; Facebook alone says nothing. This is my photo and there's no reason it's a copyright violation or can't be here for licensing reasons. I took the photo, shared it on Instagram a while back, and uploaded it myself here under CC BY-SA 4.0. I've also just sent in a statement to VRT to confirm this. Finally, The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project. (COM:INUSE) See en:User:Bsoyka. Bsoyka (talk) 13:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022041010003331 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 04:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Dog named Ghost.jpg” under ticket:2022041010003331. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permission via VRTS received. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
,_Taipei.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Taipei.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|The location is New Taipei City, not Taipei. Original uploader is Alex Neman and creator of the redirect is Richardkiwi, so the redirect does not qualify for speedy deletion and I create a regular request. Taivo (talk) 13:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
,_Taipei.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: unused redir. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
,_Taipei.jpg){kind=link}
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk". Laut Metadaten ist Manuela Matt die Fotografin / Urheberin. Kein Hinweis, dass der Hochlader berchtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ja, ziemlich eindeutige Urheberrechtsverletzung, solange von Frau Matt keine explizite Einwilligung vorliegt. --217.239.3.239 18:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TheAafi as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: cover-images of books are copyrighted, and should be locally uploaded under fair-use-rationale only when required. Here threshold of originality should be discussed. Maybe this is considered simple cover, that case it can stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a book published by Pharos in 2015. The copyrights belong to them and I don't feel there's any thing worth to consider it for COM:TOO. ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted book cover. --Wdwd (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused PNG logo uploaded by a blocked user. Yann (talk) 10:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of project scope. If the data are really useful, then they should be written directly into articles. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
miss uploaded Kakarlaathreya9 (talk) 11:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kyaw My Aung (talk · contribs)
[edit]photos from other websites.
- File:ဘုရားဖူးလှည်းဝိုင်းကြီးများ.png
- File:ကျေးရွာများမှလှည်းများဖြင့်ရွှေနတ်တောင်ဗုဒ္ဓပူဇနိယပွဲတော်သို့လာရောက်ခြင်း.png
- File:လူနတ်နှစ်လီတရစ်စီစေတီရွှေနတ်တောင်.png
- File:အပေါ်စီးမြင်ကွင်း.png
- File:Shwe Nat Taung Pagoda 2020.png
- File:Shwe Nat Taung Pagoda.png
- File:ရွှေနတ်တောင်ဘုရားထီးတော်.png
- File:သုံးဆူတောင်စေတီတော် (2021).png
- File:မဟာဇိနမာရ်အောင်မြတ်စွာဘုရားကြီး.png
- File:တိလောကမ္ဗူလာဘသိဒ္ဓိမဟာစေတီတော်.png
- File:သုံးဆူတောင်စေတီတော်.png
- File:ညောင်စာရေးသဘာဝရှူခင်းများ.png
- File:ရဟန္တာရှစ်ကျိပ်ရှေးဟောင်းဗုဒ္ဓရုပ်ပွားတော်များ.jpg
- File:Shwe Set Myaung Pagoda.jpg
- File:ဖုန်းမယ်တက်ခါးတည်ထားခဲ့သောရှင်ဂေါတမဘုရားကြီး( ၂၀၂၁ ).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
RZuo (talk) 11:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Nearly all of the images above are representing the buildings in Myanmar which {{FoP-Myanmar}} can in theory apply, but if the "other websites" you pointed are not well known image repository sites like Flickr, then the uploader should indeed provide informations on why these images on other websites are licensed per se, if the uploader of those remote images are also the Commons uploader themselves, then I encourage the uploader send a VRT email to clarify. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
very low quality and of no use 2003:DA:170B:1D11:61AE:7B4C:6FA5:3C24 12:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G2. Original uploader is Анастасия Берзой and redirect creator is Gpkp, so the redirect does not qualify for speedy deletion and regular deletion request is created. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PACARNYAKEYES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be under free license and unlikely to be own works by the uploader. Given that the uploader has uploaded many questionable files, these are too suspicious to be trusted as PACARNYAKEYES' own works. There are more files still not yet nominated.
- File:Map And Flag indonesia 2022, RI , Republic Of Indonesia , IRT.gif
- File:Papua Sa Pu Target 02 Animasi Flag indonesia, RI , Republic Of Indonesia.png
- File:Papua Sa Pu Target 01 Animasi Flag indonesia, RI , Republic Of Indonesia.png
- File:Papua Itu Lagi Animasi Flag indonesia, RI , Republic Of Indonesia.png
- File:Masa Depan Capital New indonesia Thn - , RI , Republic Of Indonesia.gif — while searching on reverse Google Images, a notice is indicated which reads: In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at LumenDatabase.org. Unsure if the removed result contains this very same .gif image.
- File:Papua Animasi Flag indonesia, RI , Republic Of Indonesia.jpg
- File:Map RI World And Flag indonesia, RI , Republic Of Indonesia.jpg
- File:Peta Map And Flag indonesia, RI , Republic Of Indonesia 2022 Update'D.gif
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Info it seems EugeneZelenko has tagged these and the rest of the user's uploads as missing permission, eligible for a 7-day (1-week) countdown to immediate deletion if no valid permissions from the true copyright holders are received by Wikimedia Foundation. Perhaps these can safely go after a week without VRTS permissions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Fitindia. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PACARNYAKEYES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal flag proposals; similar image previously deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Design Bendera Indonesia New 2030, Pergantian Bendera Di Sebuah Wacana DPR Ri,Kalimantan,Aceh, Maluku, Papua Barat, West Papua, Papua, Indonesia, Indonesia Timur.jpg.
- File:01 Design Bendera, Flag Indonesia New 2030, Pergantian Bendera Di Sebuah Wacana DPR Ri,Kalimantan,Aceh, Maluku, Papua Barat, West Papua, Papua, Indonesia, Indonesia Timur.jpg
- File:01 Bendera, Flag Indonesia New 2030, Pergantian Bendera Di Sebuah Wacana DPR Ri, Kalimantan,Aceh, Maluku Indonesia Barat, Indonesia Tengah, Indonesia Timur Fix.jpg
- File:Bendera Indonesia New 2030, Pergantian Bendera Di Sebuah Wacana DPR Ri, Kalimantan,Aceh, Maluku Indonesia Barat, Indonesia Tengah, Indonesia Timur Fix.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Audio files of Qur'an
[edit]Potential copyright violation: recitations by Saad el Ghamdi, who is still alive. The file metadata indicates that emobilez.com (dead domain) is the copyright holder, which already sounds suspicious. In any case, the uploaders (User:Alim-we before 20 February 2022 and User:Andaathe since 6 March 2022; do I smell sockpuppetry?) have no right to claim it as their own work and publish it under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. They seem to have obtained these files from here, but not even the .xml files at the bottom of the list indicate any usable copyright license.
- File:Sura1.ogg
- File:Sura10.ogg
- File:Sura11.ogg
- File:Sura112.ogg
- File:Sura113.ogg
- File:Sura114.ogg
- File:Sura12.ogg
- File:Sura13.ogg
- File:Sura14.ogg
- File:Sura15.ogg
- File:Sura16.ogg
- File:Sura17.ogg
- File:Sura18.ogg
- File:Sura19.ogg
- File:Sura2.ogg
- File:Sura20.ogg
- File:Sura21.ogg
- File:Sura22.ogg
- File:Sura23.ogg
- File:Sura24.ogg
- File:Sura25.ogg
- File:Sura26.ogg
- File:Sura27.ogg
- File:Sura28.ogg
- File:Sura29.ogg
- File:Sura3.ogg
- File:Sura30.ogg
- File:Sura31.ogg
- File:Sura32.ogg
- File:Sura33.ogg
- File:Sura34.ogg
- File:Sura35.ogg
- File:Sura36.ogg
- File:Sura37.ogg
- File:Sura38.ogg
- File:Sura39.ogg
- File:Sura4.ogg
- File:Sura40.ogg
- File:Sura41.ogg
- File:Sura42.ogg
- File:Sura43.ogg
- File:Sura44.ogg
- File:Sura45.ogg
- File:Sura46.ogg
- File:Sura47.ogg
- File:Sura48.ogg
- File:Sura49.ogg
- File:Sura5.ogg
- File:Sura50.ogg
- File:Sura51.ogg
- File:Sura52.ogg
- File:Sura53.ogg
- File:Sura54.ogg
- File:Sura55.ogg
- File:Sura56.ogg
- File:Sura57.ogg
- File:Sura58.ogg
- File:Sura59.ogg
- File:Sura6.ogg
- File:Sura67.ogg
- File:Sura7.ogg
- File:Sura8.ogg
- File:Sura9.ogg
HyperGaruda (talk) 07:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
The last page of File:El-Ihtiyar (for print).pdf and page 772 of File:El-Ihtiyar.pdf indicate that these files represent a 1998 translation into Turkish by Mehmet Keskin, so PD-Old is out of the question. I could not find other PD provisions in the text, so per COM:PCP, this could be copyright violation.
HyperGaruda (talk) 07:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Improper licensing. 1950s album cover is obviously not own work. The helper5667 (talk) 07:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
User made "prototype logo" which was never used by Warner Bros. Discovery, also uses a copyrighted globe from: https://www.nicepng.com/maxp/u2q8a9u2a9a9o0o0/, which states "[...] use it for personal non-commercial use". vistadan 07:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, complex logo with copyrightes elements. --Wdwd (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
nothing to show the uploader owns this image, looks like a poor-quality screen grab, or at least taken from another website Lugnuts (talk) 09:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Copy of a drawing from unkown source; very likely not public domain; acc. to the comment of the author at https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anker_%28Elektrotechnik%29&type=revision&diff=221938083&oldid=219008831 it's from an "old book" of Kosmos Dermartinrockt (talk) 10:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe die Zeichnung aus dem Anleitungsbuch für einen Kosmos-Elektro,-technik- oder -mechanik-Experimentierkasten von meinem Vater herauskopieren lassen. Dann habe ich diese Zeichnung eingescannt und in die Wikipedia gestellt.
- Ich habe mir das deswegen erlaubt, weil die Zeichnung wahrscheinlich aus den 60er- bis 70er-Jahren stammt und daher die Urheberrechte schon verfallen sein müssten. Benjamin Kind (talk) 13:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)--Benjamin Kind (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich bin kein Experte für Urheberrecht. Hier habe ich mich kurz belesen. Dort findet man: "Vielmehr ist das Urheberrecht für den Text erloschen, denn die Dauer des Schutzes ist auf siebzig Jahre nach dem Tod des Urhebers beschränkt." Wer war der Author und wann ist er verstorben?--Dermartinrockt (talk) 07:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe das Heft heute nicht mehr. Die Kopie von der Zeichnung daraus wurde in den 90-er-Jahren gemacht. Und jetzt erst habe ich es eingescannt.
- Ich werde heute beim Kosmos-Verlag in Stuttgart anrufen und fragen ob ich das Bild veröffentlichen darf. Es ist ja auch ein Bild und kein Text. Es wäre sehr schade wenn dieses Aufschlussreiche Bild der Öffentlichkeit nicht zugänglich sein sollte. Benjamin Kind (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe nachgeschaut, auf der gleichen Internetseite, unter dem Suchbegriff "... Zeichnung ...". Dort steht sogar drin dass die Zeichnung vielleicht gar nicht mal unter das Urheberrecht fällt, weil in ihr eine weit verbreitete Sache dargestellt wird. Ich will allerdings nicht darauf bestehen, dass kein Urheberrecht gilt, wenn dies in Wirklichkeit der Fall ist. Dann müsste es Du eben löschen. Es wäre allerdings sehr schade wenn dieses Bild, wie gesagt, der Öffentlichkeit nicht zugänglich ist.Benjamin Kind (talk) Benjamin Kind (talk) 04:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Beim Kosmos-Verlag-Stuttgart hat man mir gesagt, das der Kosmos-Verlag mir es erlaubt diese Zeichnung zu veröffentlichen.
- Die Frau am Telefon hat mir aber auch gesagt, das der Urheber auf mich zukommen könnte.
- Dann müsste das Bild vielleicht doch gelöscht werden.Benjamin Kind (talk) Benjamin Kind (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Die Zeichnung ist schon so alt, wie gesagt aus den 60-er bis 70-er Jahren, das der Urheber vielleicht schon gestorben ist oder sehr alt ist und längst nicht mehr sagen wird das seine Zeichnung nicht veröffentlicht werden darf.Benjamin Kind (talk) Benjamin Kind (talk) 07:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Warum erstellst du nicht selbst eine Darstellung zum Dreifach-T-Anker, um der Diskussion aus dem Weg zu gehen? Beim Doppel-T-Anker hat sich ja auch jemand die Mühe gemacht (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppel-T-Anker#/media/Datei:Gleichstrommaschine.svg). Dazu könntest du das Freeware-Programm Inkscape (https://inkscape.org/de/) nutzen. Ist zwar am Anfang ein wenig Arbeit, um sich reinzufitzen, aber dann ist es sehr praktisch. Ich nutze es inzwischen auch auf Arbeit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dermartinrockt (talk • contribs) 07:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das müsste dann jemand anderes machen, der sich damit auskennt.Benjamin Kind (talk) Benjamin Kind (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Wie gesagt: Ich wünsche mir sehr das dieses Bild beim Text dabeisteht.
- Wenn dies allerdings nicht möglich ist, dann bin ich auch damit einverstanden wenn Du das Bild löschst und nur den Text den ich zum Dreifach-T-Anker reingeschrieben habe stehen lässt.
- Dann hätte man auch den Fortschritt, das im Text der Dreifach-T-Anker beschrieben wird.Benjamin Kind (talk) Benjamin Kind (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Die Zeichnung des Ringankers von Grammé ist doch auch eine alte Zeichnung die aus der alten Literatur stammt?. Benjamin Kind (talk) 13:47, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Einlenkung: Die Zeichnung von Gramme ist wirklich schon sehr alt. Deswegen sind die Urheberrechte hier verfallen - ich verstehe.
- zur Antwort von 09:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC): Es ist mir zu anstrengend mit dem freien Programm eine Zeichnung zu erstellen. Das ist mir zu kompliziert. Ich bin nicht so hochintelligent.Benjamin Kind (talk) Benjamin Kind (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich entscheide nicht, ob das Bild gelöscht wird. Mut Inkscape zu arbeiten, hat nichts mit Intelligenz zu tun. Du traust dir außerdem zu, bei Wikipedia Artikel zu editieren. Du müsstest dich halt reinarbeiten. Bei Youtube gibts vielleicht auch Videos dazu.--Dermartinrockt (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe gesehen, dass die Bearbeitung des Artikels "Anker(Elektrotechnik) angenommen wurde. Vielen Dank an Dich und die Wikipedia. Das Bild steht auch mit drin. Es ist jetzt für die gesamte Öffentlichkeit verfügbar.
- Da steckt auch die Geschichte drin, dass mein Klassenlehrer in den 90er-Jahren dieses Bild nämlich nicht für die Mitschüler kopieren wollte. Benjamin Kind (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Mein Klassenlehrer in den 90-er-Jahren wollte dieses Bild sicher deswegen nicht kopieren, weil zu dieser Zeit noch Urheberrechte bestanden. Das habe ich jetzt im Nachhinein auch kapiert.Benjamin Kind (talk) Benjamin Kind (talk) 14:37, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich glaube auch, dass es nicht mehr notwendig ist eine eigene Zeichnung zu erstellen. Der Urheber wird sich sicherlich freuen, dass das Bild veröffentlicht wird. Benjamin Kind (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe mir von dem Gespräch mit dem Kosmos-Verlag in Stuttgart eine Ton-Aufnahme gemacht. Diese habe ich mir jetzt nochmal angehört. Ich habe dabei herausgefunden, dass man mir zwar sagte, das ich das Bild veröffentlichen darf. Man sagte mir aber auch das ich dafür keine offizielle Genehmigung bekomme. Wenn die Urheber auf mich zukommen, muss ich das selbst mit ihnen regeln.
- Deshalb habe ich die Formulierung unter dem Bild: "Mit freundlicher Genehmigung...", jetzt gelöscht. Benjamin Kind (talk) 04:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich entscheide nicht, ob das Bild gelöscht wird. Mut Inkscape zu arbeiten, hat nichts mit Intelligenz zu tun. Du traust dir außerdem zu, bei Wikipedia Artikel zu editieren. Du müsstest dich halt reinarbeiten. Bei Youtube gibts vielleicht auch Videos dazu.--Dermartinrockt (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Warum erstellst du nicht selbst eine Darstellung zum Dreifach-T-Anker, um der Diskussion aus dem Weg zu gehen? Beim Doppel-T-Anker hat sich ja auch jemand die Mühe gemacht (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppel-T-Anker#/media/Datei:Gleichstrommaschine.svg). Dazu könntest du das Freeware-Programm Inkscape (https://inkscape.org/de/) nutzen. Ist zwar am Anfang ein wenig Arbeit, um sich reinzufitzen, aber dann ist es sehr praktisch. Ich nutze es inzwischen auch auf Arbeit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dermartinrockt (talk • contribs) 07:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ich bin kein Experte für Urheberrecht. Hier habe ich mich kurz belesen. Dort findet man: "Vielmehr ist das Urheberrecht für den Text erloschen, denn die Dauer des Schutzes ist auf siebzig Jahre nach dem Tod des Urhebers beschränkt." Wer war der Author und wann ist er verstorben?--Dermartinrockt (talk) 07:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. @Benjamin Kind: Bitte siehe COM:VRTS und COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 07:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:OOS, the image was created to represent a "country" whose article was created by a user on eswiki. It was immediately deleted due to it not being relevant enough under eswiki criteria. Nacaru (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:OOS, the image was created to represent a "country" whose article was created by a user on eswiki. It was immediately deleted due to it not being relevant enough under eswiki criteria. Nacaru (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:OOS, the image was created to represent a "country" whose article was created by a user on eswiki. It was immediately deleted due to it not being relevant enough under eswiki criteria. Nacaru (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:OOS, the image was created to represent a "country" whose article was created by a user on eswiki. It was immediately deleted due to it not being relevant enough under eswiki criteria. Nacaru (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Dj Parisa spam Trade (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: --Trade (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 08:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since). 1942 photo, check for PD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 08:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
fair use Wiki Farazi (talk) 03:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
fair use Wiki Farazi (talk) 03:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
fair use Wiki Farazi (talk) 03:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
fair use Wiki Farazi (talk) 03:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama of any sort in Indonesia for commercial exploitations of public art and architecture designed by living or recently-deceased architects, muralists, sculptors, et cetera. Grha BNI (left) was completed in 1989 and designed by Perentjana Djaja in cooperation with P&T Architects (source). For Wisma 46 (right), it was completed in 1996 and designed by Zeidler Partnership Architects with DP Architects Private Ltd., see also COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wisma 46. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This is another exmaple of Wikilawyering against Indonesian articles Davidelit (talk) 07:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Davidelit: Commons COM:CARES for the artworks and architectural works' copyrights, even if most of the people in the involved country do not. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Indonesia#Freedom_of_panorama. --Wdwd (talk) 08:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. Commercial license from the architects is required. The building dates to 2009. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep - this is more wikilawyering against Indonesian articles. It is important to resist such moves Davidelit (talk) 08:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Indonesia#Freedom_of_panorama. --Wdwd (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo of https://www.mrcmatapedia.qc.ca/mrc/logo.html. Would require a VRT communication from the municipality to provide evidence for the claim that the Commons uploader created their logo and had the right to make a public domain dedication. Asclepias (talk) 00:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Porque sí Borrosa Erick.chachi (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lord Belbury as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence this 1940s photo is in the public domain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I guess that should have been a {{No permission}}. Delete as the source is a Tumblr post that credits the photo to "Scan from The Beatles Book Monthly No. 128". As a family photo taken in the 1940s it won't meet {{PD-UK-unknown}} unless it was published before January 1952, which seems unlikely when the Beatles weren't formed until the 1960s. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: I don't think {{No permission}} is a good option for old photos in general. We are pretty much never going to get a free license from the copyright holder, which is what that tag is trying to address. I send anything older than 70 years with unknown authorship to DR, as well as anything from the US older than 1978 with a plausible chance of having no notice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence that the original photo is either PD or free licensed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
no source given Hoyanova (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Dont exactly see what is wrong here personally, seems good to me LamLo (talk) 20:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Very likely a copyright violation, see https://www.ezramagic.com/about/ : Copyright © 2022 EzraMagic. --Wutsje 01:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kadı as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Photo for PR purposes. Wikidata item has been deleted for that reason. +cross-wiki spam. But the photo is still used on userpage in az.wiki. I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo, the user is globally locked, he is advertising in various wikis. This photo is for pr purposes, the template in azwiki deleted for that reason which was using this photo. Speedy delete… Kadı Message 13:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs) is not globally locked. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo, User:Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) is globally locked. This photo shows him and his daughter. His wikidata item deleted also. Unfortunately, in Azerbaijani Wikipedia there are lots of PR activities. Best, Kadı Message 13:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs) is not globally locked. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Taivo, this is my picture. I am not globally blocked.--E.Imanoff (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Aren't you Elshad İman? Kadı Message 14:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Don't pretend you don't know, why do you ask? Don't you know that I am Elshad Iman? E.Imanoff (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- How quickly you forgot your desire to block me globally. E.Imanoff (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- They are assuming good faith. Kadı Message 14:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- How quickly you forgot your desire to block me globally. E.Imanoff (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Don't pretend you don't know, why do you ask? Don't you know that I am Elshad Iman? E.Imanoff (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- I want to complain about Kadı, because he deliberately deletes my pictures. E.Imanoff (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is not your Instagram account. Kadı Message 14:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- What has instagram got to do with this? you deliberately chase me by following me, deliberately deleting my pictures. Example - my foto with my family, my foto, my foto with Garashov, copyrite Elshad Iman, logo copyrite Elshad Iman E.Imanoff (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Why were you blocked? Why are your pictures being deleted? Could you ask yourself that please? And also look at: COM:SCOPE. Kadı Message 15:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is real vandalism, you are deliberately deleting my category. E.Imanoff (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio : Are we doing vandalism? I tagged, you deleted. Good argument Elşat. Kadı Message 15:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is real vandalism, you are deliberately deleting my category. E.Imanoff (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Why were you blocked? Why are your pictures being deleted? Could you ask yourself that please? And also look at: COM:SCOPE. Kadı Message 15:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- What has instagram got to do with this? you deliberately chase me by following me, deliberately deleting my pictures. Example - my foto with my family, my foto, my foto with Garashov, copyrite Elshad Iman, logo copyrite Elshad Iman E.Imanoff (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is not your Instagram account. Kadı Message 14:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Aren't you Elshad İman? Kadı Message 14:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Magog the Ogre, please block this user for arbitrarily and intentionally deleting my photos to eliminate the injustice done to me, and take a step to restore my deleted photos. Thanks--E.Imanoff (talk) 15:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @E.Imanoff: way to out yourself as a sock which I can confirm by looking at your deleted photos. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022041210013307 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 20:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 16:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Laongsakul as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F6. The photo has been 12 years in Commons and deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Zenwort (talk) 21:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. What evidence is there? Uploader is an established user and nothing jumps out as a red flag from looking at uploads. On the other hand, this was the one action of the user who tagged the file. Looking at edit summaries, they seem more concerned with personality rights. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheRealAnonTheAnon (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:FANART of My Little Pony.
Lord Belbury (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- The subject of the image is of a robot unicorn that isn't specifically from My Little Pony. According to the link, "There is no copyright in a commonplace pre-existing element" -- this is a re-creation of a robot mare inspired by the artstyle of MLP. TheRealAnonTheAnon (talk) 17:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- That isn't a generic commonplace horse, though, it's drawn in the style and colour scheme of an existing copyrighted character. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- With all due respect, while they may look similar, the art style in this image is very distinct from the existing copyrighted character, both in terms of linework and shape design. Furthermore the copyrighted character in question is neither a robot nor has the number "15" etched on their body. On the subject of color schemes, from what I have managed to gather, these are not subject to copyright law. TheRealAnonTheAnon (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- That isn't a generic commonplace horse, though, it's drawn in the style and colour scheme of an existing copyrighted character. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's your own drawing of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twilight_Sparkle with a few extra lines to suggest "robot", and the number 15. It's fan art. The Commons guideline on fan art has some examples of just how obtuse and generic fan art has to get before Commons can accept it and rerelease it to the world for commercial reuse, and I'd say that this close a depiction wouldn't clear that bar. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per same rationale that File:15.ai logo.png was deleted. Note that various IPs and SPAs have been defensive in the use of this artwork which violates Commons rules; to the point where one of them called me a slur in the process. Wizzito (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- I do think that's a drawing of "a pony" - purple, robot bits and number tattoo aside. If TheRealAnonTheAnon is right in saying this is "a drawing of a robot horse inspired by the artstyle of that show", and implying this was done from scratch, why does the colour scheme seem to belong to one of the talking horses from the copyrighted show? However, I disagree with Lord Belbury - I do think this hand(?) drawn drawing is much too bad to be considered in the vectorised(?) computer animated style common to modern cartoons that I think that cartoon uses. Walt Disney or whomever, does not possess a monopoly on purple horses, and yet the colour scheme does seem similar to one of his characters. Is a colour scheme on a character of the same species enough for a copyright claim? But these arguments don't strike me as particularly strong, erring towards "Why bother at all?" than "Delete it just to be safe.". or "Keep it".
- So, I don't know, but I'd like to hear more from other people, because I disagree with half of both arguments- if this was 10 days ago, we could have made make it 50% opaque.
- Contributer232312 (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Could this potentially be moved to English Wikipedia under WP:FAIRUSE? The most similar case I know of is the dril profile picture (both being representative images of a subject that violate someone else's copyright), which was in fact deleted; however, that was at least partially influenced by the picture being used multiple times in the article, whereas here it could be used just once in the infobox. Sobsz (talk) 18:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, it's a logo for a website? It wasn't in use anywhere when I nominated it, and the descriptions don't mention it. Probably, then, although that's a question to ask at Wikipedia. The Horse_ebooks article seems okay with fair use image of someone else's copyrighted horse, at least. It just can't be on Commons with a licence allowing unlimited, unpaid, commercial reuse. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- The image in question is indeed the logo and the favicon for https://15.ai/ which is why the picture was uploaded to be used in the wikipedia entry for the website https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15.ai TheRealAnonTheAnon (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, it's a logo for a website? It wasn't in use anywhere when I nominated it, and the descriptions don't mention it. Probably, then, although that's a question to ask at Wikipedia. The Horse_ebooks article seems okay with fair use image of someone else's copyrighted horse, at least. It just can't be on Commons with a licence allowing unlimited, unpaid, commercial reuse. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep I agree with the "Why bother at all?" take. This drawing is not fan art of a character designed by someone with the initials LF. It's a custom-made drawing of a robot unicorn that was specifically made for 15.ai's Twitter profile. As a gift of sorts, if I understand it correctly. It's better than no image on the article, and makes it look nicer. I see no compelling reason to delete it. Dogman15 (talk) 10:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Reluctant Delete . I agree with Belbury, I think there would be sufficient grounds for complaint from the copyright holder if this fan image was laundered with a new license, it bearing elements from one of their characters. I think it would well be fair use on Wikipedia, but it falls foul of the precautionary principle for wikimedia commons by being a horse in the same colours. Why not upload it to Wikipedia, instead? Contributer232312 (talk) 17:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete Per COM:FANART guideline and COM:PRP policy. Same color scheme and general shape and readily identifiable as en:File:PrincessTwilightSparkle.png (not just the character, but this specific version of the character, not the earlier toy or the later shows); this is not a generic robo-unicorn. Transformation/parody works for fair use, but Commons isn't the place for that. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep There is no reason to delete the logo. It isn't a copyrighted image, nor does it depict a copyrighted character, even if it is inspired by one. Nobody owns the right to Unicorns, or the colours of purple and blue, and there are significant differences between it and the copyrighted character it somewhat resembles. Disney's anthro fox Robin Hood is copyrighted, but Robin Hood of mythology is not. Likewise, "twilight sparkle" is copyrighted, but a purple robot unicorn is not.
Bluntly, this smacks of an attitude common to wikipedia editors where spurious reasoning is used to justify deleting images that do not break any rules, but are nonetheless considered to be inappropriate because they are "too fun". This achieves nothing but edit wars such as were seen over the Tandy 1000 cat etc. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:A442:581E:1:11FE:6C80:41FA:E569 (talk) 22:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete per VernoWhitney. Anyone familiar with Twilight Sparkle will immediately recognize the logo as Twilight Sparkle. Hasbro is very vigilant about enforcing its copyright as detailed at the en:Them's Fightin' Herds article, which opted to have Lauren Faust contribute significantly different character designs rather than simply adding some lines and a number to their existing assets to comply with the cease and desist order. 93 (talk) 00:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative of copyrighted work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Not a US government work but a British publication. While the book consists largely of directories, lists and trivial notes, there are several copyrighted articles. To be out of URAA copyright in the US, the authors would have to have died before 1926, but Rayment and Cattermould were still active in 1944 and 1949 respectively. Also the 70 years pma copyright term for the UK may not have been expired for the longest-living contributor. De728631 (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Artist died in 1957, so copyrighted until 2027 in the country of origin. DrKay (talk) 06:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
File:*+* Illuminated image system Sängerhof in Sebnitz - Bildimpression eines Straßenfotografen - März 2022 - Image II.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as Dw no source since
@Wdwd: Why should this not be covered by German FoP? This is quite certainly a public passage, so legally it should be outside. There are exceptions for temporary displays. But this is probably a permanent display. In that case I would assume no problem. For this photo (unlike the other) I would also argue, that the painting is not the main motive of the photo. --Watchduck (quack) 10:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- The legal question whether a photograph from a public passage still meets the "public" requirement of the German freedom of panorama provision is unsettled and somewhat controversial in the legal world, with most current treatises saying that it does (see my ~2018 survey of the literature in de:Panoramafreiheit#cite_note-77, footnote 77). Some of the opponents rely on a theory that requires the position of the photographer to be "under the open sky" (unter freiem Himmel). This argument, however, has recently taken a bit of the blow in my opinion when the Supreme Court noted that the freedom of panorama provision "jedenfalls" ("at any rate") applies to perspectives from public locations if they are under the open sky (BGH ZUM 2017, 766, para 24 - AIDA Kussmund) - which seems to suggest that it is capable of applying to perspectives from other public locations as well. I also think that the pro-FOP argument has some additional appeal in this particular case as the passage does not appear to connect a public street with some random interior courtyard, which in fact may not be public under the German FOP statute even if it is government-owned and potentially accessible to everyone; rather, it appears to connect a public street with another public street, square, and/or park (see Category:Bronze sculpture Sängerhof (Sebnitz)), which both clearly fall within the ambit of the statute. Therefore, this looks like a Keep case to me on FOP grounds. — Pajz (talk) 14:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC) PS. The question whether the painting is the "main motive" of the image strikes me as irrelevant as the German de minimis provision requires much more (see COM:DM Germany). This is not de minimis by any stretch of the imagination.
- Keep case to me on FOP grounds - --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 12:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
This is probably a case of Commons:License laundering. I very much doubt that the YouTube channel linked owns the copyright of that video, and so they are unable to release it under a creative commons licence. Steelkamp (talk) 10:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Text or complex? Kadı Message 07:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO Germany. --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Erick.chachi (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RZuo as no permission (No permission since). Unfortunately, the Youtube link went down before it could be reviewed. However, CNS is known for consistently applying CC to their videos. Can we COM:AGF and take the uploader's word for it? They seem trustworthy to me. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- they dont consistently apply cc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbfgeO5rq4M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKuQ8tzsLwQ . and they apply cc to things that dont belong to them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyBMNI0t-h0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJDTFGqQmp8 .
- they're not reliable at all in terms of copyright. i picked these 4 examples out of their 10 most recent videos. RZuo (talk) 08:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader, who was notified of this request, did not explain whether they checked the licence, therefore the images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 01:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by P199 as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:TOO Peru, Simple or ordinary logos and designs are OK.. Considering of some design is above threshold of originality is always a bit subjective. I consider this logo not simple, so it has to be deleted regretably. --Ellywa (talk) 01:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Possibly trademarked or copyrighted logo. Unlikely to be licensed correctly. 62.216.210.62 20:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Zenwort (talk) 20:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per {{PD-textlogo}}. `IronGargoyle (talk) 01:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, below COM:TOO Andean Community. --Rosenzweig τ 06:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Es duplicado de otra publicación de mi propia autoría AbrahamMendoza2021 (talk) 06:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- “Es duplicado de otra publicación de mi propia autoría” more specific evidence? Otherwise clearly FoP-Peru --21:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate of File:Municipalidad de Magdalena del Mar.jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The claim that this is a still from a movie is missing from the source and is nothing more than an assumption by the uploader. The quality of the shot suggests that this is a studio photo in a theatrical role. In the Sadalsky's article, this photo illustrates the theatrical period of Zharov's work. If there is no evidence that this is a frame from a film and what particular film (for some reason the uploader did not bother to indicate this), then proof must be provided that the photographer died 70 or more years ago. 188.123.231.33 06:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
@Materialscientist: can evidence be provided that this picture is in the public domain in the US and the source country? Hekerui (talk) 07:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No evidence that image was published anonymously more then 70 years ago. Can be safely undeleted in 1943+121=2064 . --Ellywa (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JVJohannes (talk · contribs)
[edit]I have just deleted several other uploads by this user (which were all isolated images with the background removed, like the one with the bike in this DR). After looking through this user's uploads both here and at de.wp, I have doubts all the images used are really own work as claimed. The isolated images were all created with Photoshop CS (so far so good), but the photographs have Exif data of 5 different cameras. There's no definitive proof that the images used are not own work, but significant doubt, therefore I've nominated them all for deletion.
- File:Fahrradständer Bügelparker (37).JPG
- File:Stadtgeländer.JPG
- File:750mm Verkehrsleitkegel.JPG
- File:Stilpoller Kugelkopf.jpg
- File:Berliner Kissen mit Hinweisschild.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- “in dubio pro reo” although I do have doubts about SCOPE --Zenwort (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a criminal trial. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- (1) why it would be relevant? (2) Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- For the same reason as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Berliner_Kissen.jpg that I nominated for deletion Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader, who was notified of this request, did not explain the copyright situation, therefore these images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 02:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo! Copyright belongs to Shift4. The U.S. Space Force and Tech. Sgt. James Hodgman have not the right to put this logo into Public Domain. Ras67 (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Are you sure that logo belongs to Shift4? Because it appears to be a Space Force launch campaign patch; "1ROPS" stands for "1st Range Operations Squadron". — Huntster (t @ c) 17:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Huntster, this patch is from the USSF.--BugWarp (talk) 20:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- but then isn't USSF US government? Zenwort (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Zenwort: Yes? That's what the current license template indicates, {{PD-USGov-Military-Space Force}}. What is your concern? — Huntster (t @ c) 22:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- It actually seems to be a Space Force logo, if so Keep. But i was not able to confirm that on an other website. --Ras67 (talk) 11:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Ras67: the image can be found on this spaceforce article. I only wonder if is possible to make a svg recreation from this logo... Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is certainly possible, but i'm not good enough with Inkscape to draw it. --Ras67 (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Ras67: the image can be found on this spaceforce article. I only wonder if is possible to make a svg recreation from this logo... Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- but then isn't USSF US government? Zenwort (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Huntster, this patch is from the USSF.--BugWarp (talk) 20:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 02:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Mistification. Really, a non-free logo from https://www.ccamobile.org/ Ignatus (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Ignatus: perhaps you could adapt the description of the logo on the file page. Imho below TOO so can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 03:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This is clearly not an 18th century work. Looks quite contemporary. Likely vopyvio. Danny lost (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not explain the copyright situation or give a more clear source of this map. --Ellywa (talk) 03:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Porque sí Sinsentido Erick.chachi (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused logo, out of COM:SCOPE, possibly copyrighted as well. --Ellywa (talk) 03:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission since). Uploaded in 2016, only upload by the uploader. No earlier copies found online. Please discuss. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless of license, low quality image, 5 k only. --20:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Zenwort (talk) 20:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Supposedly this is an own image made by uploader, no reason to delete. --Ellywa (talk) 03:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
من آن را به اشتباه آپلود کردم Shahram59i (talk) 17:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: too late for a courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 08:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)