Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/02/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![162 File:Image01.png".jpg](#File:Image01.png".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![199 File:KHexEdit 0.8.6.png".jpg](#File:KHexEdit_0.8.6.png".jpg){kind=link}
_egyedi_lenyomat.jpg){kind=link}
_Cortile_interno.jpg){kind=link}
_piano_superiore_ingresso_Mostre_Gramsci_-_Ultimo_spenga_la_luce_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_convegno_anniversario_30_anni_da_Cernobyl_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_Brassai_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Flashback_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Visioni_per_Genova_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_Cortile_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Ultimo_spenga_la_luce_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_mostra_tessuti_d'artista_2016.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Mostra_Lisetta_Carmi_2016.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE MBH 05:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 07:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a copyright violation, image is used elsewhere online, and another photo from the same shoot appears on her Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/qfmRHgJGo6/ Lord Belbury (talk) 08:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the user for a month as copyvio-only user and will delete all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
child's drawing, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 10:40, 6 February 2022 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY --Krdbot 14:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation 99.226.79.29 01:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted Blatant copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Prakash0508 (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user. --Achim55 (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense, Blurry Prakash0508 (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Achim55 (talk) 21:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
No use, a simple <math> tag is more easy and accesible --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 08:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete Copyrighted cover of a DVD case. Blatant copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 00:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused, unknown female. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Fatihi Mahmoud Ismail Profile Picture 191.125.32.2 01:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Quién es? 191.125.32.2 01:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photo by user not active since 2017. No in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Quién es? 191.125.32.2 01:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Mahmoud mahjoub? 191.125.32.2 01:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Imagen de no-usuario 191.125.32.2 01:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Quién es? 191.125.32.2 01:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Quién es? 191.125.32.2 01:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
low resolution photo of a non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 01:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, non notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of a non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Se acepta? 191.125.32.2 02:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Se acepta? 191.125.32.2 02:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Se acepta? 191.125.32.2 02:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Se acepta? 191.125.32.2 02:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Syced (talk) 03:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
This image was removed from Wikipedia as a possible copyright violation, and given that the user's other uploads include a lot of unattributed iPhone memes they found online, this photoshopped montage of phone backs may not be their own work - or it may be put together from other people's photos, without credit or permission. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 14:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect chemical structure. The triazole ring should be fully unsaturated. See Category:Tazobactam for correct alternatives. Innerstream (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 23:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brenandpaul (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional gallery, not all own work apparently to publicize a politician or someone running for office. If the name Bren-and-Paul was taken to represent Mr. & Mrs. Chabot, there's no way she took the photos of him in Mosul. There's no way he took all these photos of himself.
- File:Paul Chabot media interview.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot onboard aircraft in Iraq.jpg
- File:Paul and Brenda Chabot.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot at the White House.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot speaks at US Naval Academy.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot speaks to Veterans.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot outside of Mosul Iraq 2008.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot and Sigma Phi Epsilon supporters.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot with Flag and Podium.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot LAPD helicopter.jpg
- File:Navy Officer Paul Chabot Left.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot in New Orleans to help with Hurricane Katrina Crime Spike Representing San Bernardino County Sheriff, California.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot Law Enforcement Speech.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot along US Mexico Border.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot SMASH Officer San Bernardino County Sheriff.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot Campaign Event Fundraiser.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot educating SigEps.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot Arrives Home from Iraq.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot campaign event.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot Event.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot CNN Interview.jpg
- File:Paul Chabot on patrol San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department.jpg
- File:Commander Paul Chabot US Navy.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
self promo on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
This is a photo someone took of a printed photo using an iPad. The copyright holder would be the person who took the original photo, not the person who took the iPad photo. We need clarification on who took the original photo and that they agree to release this under a free license, or else we may have to assume this is a copyright violation. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep Why isn't the assumption that they took the image with an analogue camera in 1978, and then digitized it with their iPad? When we find a copy of a digital image somewhere else online we should be suspicious, but, when contextual clues show the image to be unique we should assume good faith. The Precautionary principle requires that there be significant doubt to delete a file, which would require some evidence that the license is incorrect. We shouldn't delete based on a hunch, we need evidence. If you believe the uploader is too young, and an older family member took the original image, we have Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs. --RAN (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. If this is really the uploader's own photo "digitized" by photographing it with an iPad as suggested, please send an e-mail to COM:VRT. --Rosenzweig τ 14:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
The structure of thiourea is incorrect. Innerstream (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 04:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 02:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. I have replaced it with File:Peroxyoxalic-acid-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 04:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
The hexafluoroantimonate group is missing a negative charge. Innerstream (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as it has chemical inaccuracies, it does not meet EDUSE despite being used in an eo.wiki (the author of this file is an editor there and is responsible for introducing a lot of incorrect files and data to more than one project). Also, this file does not meet IUPAC's recommendations on chemical diagrams. Wostr (talk) 04:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 10:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Composite image, not clear that the backdrop (https://www.attractiontickets.com/en/new-york-attraction-tickets/new-york-attractions/empire-state-building) is out of copyright. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:56, 14 February 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Poster --Krdbot 20:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio| 1=https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-newspaper-printing-press-1898-99-135097900.html}} Mackle.td (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: Hi sorry. New webpage added, sorry, thank Mackle.td (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Db-g7}} Mackle.td (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-expired, the fact that Alamy is selling it does not change its status. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Hi Can I delete this current B&W image to replace it with this image from: https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/ it has the original signature and more color.Mackle.td (talk) 16 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Db-g7}} would like to pls replace with this image:https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/ it includes a signature and more color Mackle.td (talk) 01:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC) {{Db-g7}} Mackle.td (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ Hi Can I delete this current B&W image to replace it with this image from: https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/ it has the original signature and more color. Mackle.td (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠Please I am begging. Can I delete this image. I'm scared I messed up. I can reupload with a more appropriate version: https://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732&VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732#/SearchResult&VBID=24UP1GRA8LPCD&PN=1&WS=SearchResults Mackle.td (talk) 00:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Keeping. Esta parece más grande. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.116.20.130 (talk) 22:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠I'm really not sure if this is in the public domain. I just listed the date it was made (I don't know when it was published). Is there anyway to get this taken down. Please, I made a mistake I should have checked first. I'm so sorry. Mackle.td (talk) 22:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also could this be applied? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope/Precautionary_principle Since the image was taken by the Byron Company (which is still around) and the collection is here: https://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732&VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732 which requires licensing to use the images. Mackle.td (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Close as Kept. No reason for deletion; disruptive multiple templates. (Clearly public domain in US, country of origin- 1898 is old enough even if not published at time.) A different version of a public domain work may be uploaded without deleting an existing version. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio |1=Although the original photo is in the public domain, this is a derivative work from here: https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-newspaper-printing-press-1898-99-135097900.html and as such copyrighted by the stock image contributor. The pd image can be used, but as you can see there are significant changes between the pd and the derivative work. https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/}} Mackle.td (talk) 08:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
@Storkk: Your deletion is contrary to the previous admin decision. Would you please review this page and work it through with the admin as this looks like a brute force deletion request. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing this to my attention. This was an obvious error on my part. I've checked the surrounding deletions in Category:Copyright violations I made, and think those were correct, so I must have selected this one by accident. Storkk (talk) 11:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- I've added a nowiki tag to the template to avoid transclusion and categorization. A full deletion request, upon which people can comment, supercedes a speedy deletion request except in the most obvious cases. Storkk (talk) 11:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Offering an image for sale does not transfer the copyright or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio | 1= This image is originally taken from the (and is most likely published by) the Byron Collection at the Museum of the City of New York (google ID number: MNY17174). Looking at the page it requires licensing. If the image was previously unpublished, the museum may be the publisher/copyright owner. It would be important to present or get permission from the museum before other users can use this image (also read museum's policy on rights and reproductions of image). Please reconsider this issue as situation as copyright violations not only harm Wikipedia's redistributability, but also create legal issues for others. url= https://collections.mcny.org/CS.aspx?VP3=SearchResult&VBID=24UP1GRA8LPCD&PN=1&WS=SearchResults}} Jujutacul65 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment As there was already an open deletion discussion, no need to redundantly relist. Just give your comments in the ongoing discussion. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)- Keep per previous discussion; any Copyfraud (slapping a notice on something that was already copyright expired) does nothing to change the underlying PD status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No creative alterations has been made which warrants a copyright protection in the US according to our rules on PD-art and PD-scan. This is a slavish and faithful recreation of the original work. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as the previous two decisions. --Rosenzweig τ 23:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
File:© tinyBE Foto- Josefine Rauch tiny Info-Box schneider+schumacher Metzlerpark Frankfurt 12.jpg
[edit]
Copyvio: According to file name, this photo is copyright by Josefine Rauch and not by the uploaders. As all the other uploads by this/these user(s) are copyvios, it seems improbable that this one should be their own work. 217.239.4.223 19:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Unique ID of original document: xmp.did:8BF843C22274EC119B23808095C71D43 Trabajo propio? 191.125.32.2 01:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by علاء at 04:07, 22 February 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 08:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steinberg-Vieville (talk · contribs)
[edit]Art without artist permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:« Ainsi qu’une sylphide au fond de la coulisse » 35 x 28 cm.jpg
- File:Eska Kayser, plein soleil 2019.jpg
- File:Denise gatard, pichets en céramique, extérieur bleu et noir, intérieur noir, (1960), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, vide-poches en céramique, extérieur blanc, vert et bleu, intérieur blanc, (1963), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, bol en céramique, extérieur noir, intérieur blanc, 13 x 9 cm, (1970), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, plat à décor de poisson, extérieur noir, 31 cm de diamètre, (1976), col. privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, pied de lampe en céramique, 50 x 20 cm, (1980), Col. privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, pied de lampe toupie, en céramique, (1980), 34 x 25 cm, col privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, cendrier en céramique, extérieur blanc, intérieur mordoré, 18 x 14 x 8 cm, (1987), col Professeurivée (Pris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, grande coupe en céramique (or), 30 x 8 cm, (1975), col privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, bol fin, mordoré mat et or brillant, 13 x 9 cm, (1970), col privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, pichets en céramique, extérieur vert, blanc et noir, intérieur blanc, 24 x 5,5 x 14,5 cm, (1976), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, pot en céramique, (1980), 50 x 25 cm, col privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, boîte ronde, 8,5 cm, (circa 1980), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, miroir en céramique mordorée, 14 cm, (1965), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, broche de revers, céramique mordorée craquelée (1960), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, collier en céramique mordorée, (1956), coll privée (Paris).jpg
- File:Denise gatard, pot en céramique torsadée, noir, 22 cm, (1949), coll privée (Paris).jpg
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_col._priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_Col._priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_34_x_25_cm,_col_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_col_Professeuriv%C3%A9e_(Pris).jpg){kind=link}
,_30_x_8_cm,_(1975),_col_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_col_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_50_x_25_cm,_col_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
,_coll_priv%C3%A9e_(Paris).jpg){kind=link}
* File:Denise gatard, chandelier en céramique dorée.jpg
- File:Denise gatard, miroir en céramique, noir mat, 27 x 27 cm, 1985, coll..jpg
- File:Denise gatard, paire de pichets en céramique émaillée, blanc et rouge.jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, Pieds de lampe, (1960).jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, coupe émaillée mordorée.jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, Lampe.jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, collier.jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, portrait (1969).jpg
- File:Denise gatard monogramme.jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, bijou.jpg
File:Denise GATARD, Bijoux - collection particulière Paris.jpg- File:Normandie-la chasse, les renards et les marabouts.jpg – duplicate of the following one, to be deleted. --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
* File:Normandie, le Fumoir, la Chasse - les renards et les marabots.jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, Baguier.jpg
- File:Denise Gatard, Coupe (1982).jpg
- File:Denise Gatard-Pied de lampe (1965).jpg
File:Denise Gatard-Signature.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Wait. For most of the pieces by Denise Gatard, we have permission per Ticket:2022012710007721, and for 17 of them, that permission was already noted in the file descriptions before you wrote your delete request. @Ellin Beltz: please have a little more diligence with such deletion requests! For the remaining files, I am confident that we will get it sorted out in correspondence with the client. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- For the last 17 of the above mentioned files, the delete request is not valid since they already had a valid permission before the request was issued. I struck them. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, VRT permission received. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steinberg-Vieville (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images en double : il faut en garder une des deux.
- File:Normandie-la chasse, les renards et les marabouts.jpg
- File:Normandie, le Fumoir, la Chasse - les renards et les marabots.jpg
Habertix (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:« Ainsi qu’une sylphide au fond de la coulisse » 35 x 28 cm.jpg” under ticket:2022020410010614. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Eska Kayser, plein soleil 2019.jpg” under ticket:2022020410010614. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for the remaining files on the list under ticket:2022012710007721. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)--Mussklprozz (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Mussklprozz: for my last request about
- the two images are identical. One is enough. Thanks.
- Habertix (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Habertix: Agreed. I suggest to delete the first one. As it happens, the client has written just this morning that she erroneously uploaded a few duplicates. I have to find out what the other ones are. --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Mussklprozz: If you keep the second one, can you rename it to correct the spelling mistake : the birds are fr:Marabout (oiseau) not marabots. Thanks. Habertix (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC).
- @Habertix: Agreed. I suggest to delete the first one. As it happens, the client has written just this morning that she erroneously uploaded a few duplicates. I have to find out what the other ones are. --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Status
[edit]The client and I re-checked the heirs' list and found that seven of the files were either not included or were duplicates. The following files shall be deleted:
- File:Denise Gatard, coupe émaillée mordorée.jpg duplicate, delete
- File:Denise Gatard, Lampe.jpg no permission, delete
- File:Denise GATARD, Bijoux - collection particulière Paris.jpg no permission, delete
- File:Normandie-la chasse, les renards et les marabouts.jpg no permission, delete
- File:Normandie, le Fumoir, la Chasse - les renards et les marabots.jpg no permission, delete
- File:Denise Gatard-Signature.jpg no permission, delete
- File:Denise gatard, paire de pichets en céramique émaillée, blanc et rouge.jpg no permission, delete
All others shall be kept.
Please pardon the mistake, the list came as a lenghty PDF which was difficult to process. All other files than those sic are OK.
--Mussklprozz (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Procedural close. This has been actioned already. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
No requiere OTRS? 191.125.32.2 02:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Facebook 191.125.32.2 02:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Author studio3df 191.125.32.2 02:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedysta:Igaoner/Micha%C5%82_Linow 191.125.32.2 02:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Requiere OTRS 191.125.32.2 02:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dos amigos? 191.125.32.2 02:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No vaild deletion reason: this user, propably in bad faith, even don't google file name. Matlin (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
En vez de acusar la gente con sospechas negativas, por qué mejor no se pone a categorizar sus archivos? Así sabríamos de quienes se tratan sus personajes... Gracias a esa persona mala Vd se ha acordado de hacer lo necesario, aunque tarde, no? Hasta nunca.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Watermarked as "Created by Ahmed Rojali", which does not match the uploader username. (Other uploads have been watermarked "© FVNunikPurbasari".) These are low resolution images at a 16:9 screen size, suggesting they may have been taken as screenshots.
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Most deleted by Hekerui. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
File File:InternerShuttle.jpg
[edit]
Das Foto nennt Hubert Szczepaniak als Urheber. In den Exif Daten des Fotos steht: Urheberrechte: Copyright:Detlev Wecke. --AxelHH (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Pi. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication at source that this is freely licensed. A loose necktie (talk) 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of the photograph. We need permissions of the original photographer. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
upload by mistake Shenzhiming88 (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Centered on copyrighted work. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Centered on copyrighted work. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no FOP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
It seems that this stamp is marked © Disney , see also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Stamp_of_Azerbaijan_530.jpg SV1XV (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Probably safest to delete for now, and undelete at some unknown date. The stamp itself is public domain, but the underlying work is probably not free at this point. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with you Gone Postal Yahoot7 (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Professional photo. Uploaded by user with a history of copyright violations across multiple accounts. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Info Please keep this photo of Kamila Valieva, she is such a beautiful skater and artist, hope we can keep it. Julieprus (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- This doesn't have anything to do with whether the picture should be kept or not, it is a copyrighted work and it has no place on WikiCommons per its rules. Fans of the athlete are free to submit their own work under Creative Commons to enrich the article, but not to steal someone else's. Gwennire (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Why hasn't this been removed yet? 2 weeks. Sayrelis (talk) 10:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Backlog. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable. See d:Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/02/06#Q109806420. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Youssefalawal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violations. Found elsewhere online.
- File:حلف اليمين.jpg
- File:اجتماع مع الرئيس السيسي.jpg
- File:ثييييي.jpg
- File:الدكتور صالح عبدالرحمن الشيخ.jpg
- File:الدكتور صالح الشيخ ووزير القوى العاملة محمد سعفان.jpg
- File:101504-وزير-الرياضة-مع-رئيس-الجهاز-المركزى.jpg
- File:صالح الشيخ.jpg
- File:صالح-آل-الشيخ-رئيس-الجهاز-المركزى-للتنظيم-والإدارة.jpg
- File:IMG-20211110-WA0024-1.jpg
- File:AFKovTdw5KRC Yq1.jpg
- File:رئيس مجلس الوزراء.jpg
- File:أحد اجتماعات.jpg
- File:صالح-الشيخ-رئيس-جهاز-التنظيم-والإدارة.jpg
- File:الدكتور صالح الشيخ في أحد الاجتماعات.jpg
- File:الدكتور صالح الشيخ.jpg
- File:صالح-الشيخ-1.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Flickr washing after the image was located online under this user's original account. All these images are found elsewhere.
- File:Tesla Model Y.png
- File:Tesla Model 3 - 50968889018.png
- File:Tesla Model X.png
- File:Tesla Model S.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
No legitimate rationale is given; source for this image is unknown and the selection of the creative commons licensing seems completely arbitrary Indy beetle (talk) 15:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Indy beetle The original source was the printed copy of the official portrait of President Stevens when he became the third prime minister of of Sierra Leone in April 1968. This photograph was displayed in homes and offices across the country. The photographer was never mentioned nor identified. So far Sierra Leone copyright laws are concerned, this is very much public property now. This photograph is totally free o copyright. You can't find it anywhere it is copyrighted or the author's name shown. --Hassanjalloh1 (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- I see then it appears to be presently PD in Sierra Leone, but "source" should be updated to reflect the photo's true origins. An example of the photo in official use in 1968 would be nice. Not sure if URAA applies to Sierra Leone, but if it did it would almost certainly still be copyrightable in the US. -Indy beetle (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Indy beetle The original source was the printed copy of the official portrait of President Stevens when he became the third prime minister of of Sierra Leone in April 1968. This photograph was displayed in homes and offices across the country. The photographer was never mentioned nor identified. So far Sierra Leone copyright laws are concerned, this is very much public property now. This photograph is totally free o copyright. You can't find it anywhere it is copyrighted or the author's name shown. --Hassanjalloh1 (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Less quality copy of File:TDS09708.jpg Drakosh (talk) 15:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:HILOKI２.png
- File:HILOKI.png
- File:MATECH２.png
- File:HIROKI.png
- File:MATSUMOTO.png
- File:MATECH.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Tomorrow´s national singer logo.png
- File:Logo TV Chosun 3.png
- File:Logo TV Chosun 2.jpg
- File:Logo TV CHOSUN.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete Copyrighted cover of a DVD case. Blatant copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
G1 Pacha Tchernof (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
File EXIFs show "Copyright holder Halid Izzet#rhubarbphoto#❤️📸 k Izzet photography, Rhubarb&Custard photography" and "Usage terms Email Halid@rhubarbandcustard.com for useage rights. 07968429478". VRT permission from Halid Izzet needed.
MKFI (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
"Photography by Chris Cook, Shaun Swain and Alistair Keith". VRT permission from photographer needed. MKFI (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
"Photograph by Bruce Mackay". VRT permission from Bruce Mackay needed. MKFI (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Album cover, "Design by Alistair Keith and Maxwell Hutton". VRT permission from Alistair Keith and Maxwell Hutton needed. MKFI (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Debanutosh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artwork by and images related to Asu Dev, died 1983. Artwork is still copyrighted and needs permission from the artist's heirs. Images are certainly not own work and from a variety of sources. Some might be old enough to be in public domain but would need more information to know.
- File:Asudev exhibition catalogue 1965.pdf
- File:A letter from Dr Suniti Kumar Chatterjee written to Asu Dev Page 2.jpg
- File:A letter from Dr Suniti Kumar Chatterjee written to Asu Dev Page 1.jpg
- File:Asu Dev with his drama troupe sometime in 1950s.jpg
- File:Assam-tribune-epaper page 1.jpg
- File:Amit Nag on Umesh Chandra Deb.jpg
- File:Umesh chandra deb publication on Sankardeva (2).jpg
- File:Umesh chandra deb publication on Sankardeva (1).jpg
- File:Asudev's signature.jpg
- File:Asudev signature.jpg
- File:First Asudev Art Scholarship awardee 2017.jpg
- File:Memento of Asu Dev Art Scholarship 2018.jpg
- File:Invitation for Second Asu Dev Art Scholarship 2018.jpg
- File:2018 Second Asu Dev Art Scholarship awarded to Debangona Paul.jpg
- File:Assam-tribune-14-december-2017.jpg
- File:Inauguration of the Asu Dev Centenary Retrospective 2017 by Harekrishna Deka.jpg
- File:Inauguration of the Asu Dev Centenary Retrospective 2017.jpg
- File:Inauguration of the Asu Dev Centenary Retrospective 2017 by Dhiren Saikia.jpg
- File:Dr. Hiren Gohain expressions.jpg
- File:Inauguration of the Asudev Centenary Retrospective 2017 Guwahati.jpg
- File:Harekrishna Deka expressions.jpg
- File:Banner for the Asudev Centenary Retrospective 2017 Guwahati.jpg
- File:Dr Hiren Gohain at the Asudev Centenary Retrospective 2017.jpg
- File:Asudev Centenary Retrospective 2017.jpg
- File:At the Asudev Centenary Retrospective 2017.jpg
- File:Asu Dev ancestral house in Guwahati.jpg
- File:Asu Dev's marriage on 5th June 1951.jpg
- File:Asu Dev.jpg
- File:Asudev Art Scholarship.jpg
- File:FELICITATIONS AT 25 TH BIHU AT LATASIL GUWAHATI ASSAM 1982.jpg
- File:AT THE HOUSE OF SOVIET CULTURE.jpg
- File:DEVAKANTA BAROOAH INAUGURATES 1969 EXHIBITION.jpg
- File:1977 EXHIBITION.jpg
- File:1977 EXHIBITION WITH ARTIST FRIEND PROSENJIT DUARA.jpg
- File:KOLKATA EXHIBITION 1982.jpg
- File:Denmark school visit 3.jpg
- File:Denmark school visit.jpg
- File:Letter from the Vice president of India.jpg
- File:Letter from Suniti Kumar Chatterjee.jpg
- File:Letter from the Soviet Consulate.jpg
- File:Letters for ASUDEV.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTING A LAZY EVENING ON THE BRAHMAPUTRA c.1966.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S SCULPTURE WRESTLERS c.1957.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S SCULPTURE WOMAN.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING WINDOWS.jpg
- File:ASUDEV's PAINTING VIRGINITY c.1964.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING TREES AT NEHRU PARK c.1941.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING THE WAKE c. 1948.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING THE SILENT FLUTTER c. 1965.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING THE GOSSIP c.1936-1940.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING THE CAGE c.1958.jpg
- File:ASUDEV's PAINTING SYMPHONY c.1973.jpg
- File:ASUDEV's PAINTING STREAM c.1936.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING STONE BREAKERS.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING SPRING TIME c.1978.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S SCULPTURE SHIVA.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING SHILLONG BY NIGHT.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING SHADOW OF LIFE c. 1981.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING SELF PORTRAIT.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING SANTHAL VIRGINS c.1936-1940.jpg
- File:ASUDEV's PAINTING RED ON THE LOOM c.1975.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING PORTRAIT OF A TREE c.1960.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING PINE AVENUE.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING PICNIC c.1950.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING ON THE WAY TO WORK c.1964.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING NIGHT AWAKE c.1978.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING MY COMRADE c.1966.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTING MOUNTAINS.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTING LOTUS POND.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING LOOKING FOR FISH 2.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING LOOKING FOR FISH c.1965.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING LIGHT MORE LIGHTS.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING LIFE MOVES ON c.1973.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING IN THE CORNFIELD c.1957.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING HUMANITY UPROOTED c.1968.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING HIDE AND SEEK c.1964.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING HARVESTING.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING THE HARIJAN c.1966.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING THE GRAVEYARD c.1940.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING FULFILLMENT.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING THE HUNT c.1978.jpg
- File:ASUDEV'S PAINTING ECLIPSE.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTNG THE CRUCIAL MONTH.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTING THE CONTENDERS.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTING COMPOSITION 2.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTING COMPOSITION 3.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S PAINTING CITY LIFE.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' S SCULPTURE COMPANION.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' s PAINTING BIRTH OF A NEW RHYTHM c. 1981.jpg
- File:ASU DEV' S PAINTING BIRTH OF A NEW LIFE c.1962.jpg
- File:ASUDEV' s PAINTING - A PORTRAIT OF BELA DEB.jpg
- File:ASUDEV.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MKFI (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- You are right Sir. The images of paintings are obtained from the Artist's family members. They are also available in the official website Debanutosh (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Debanutosh: Asu Dev website specifically forbids uploading images under free license to places like Wikipedia: "Materials (Text & Images) may be borrowed from the website, intended exclusively for Academic purpose only after obtaining prior permission/authorization from the author." MKFI (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sir,
- On request Asu Dev's family members (heirs) have allowed the use of the images and textual facts for non commercial uses. The images are also available on the official website.
- The images of Art works have been photographed by myself at the AAF (Asu Dev Art Foundation) where the paintings are displayed for public viewing.
- The photographic documentation of all documents and records had been done during the period of two years taking time due to the Covid-19 restrictions. Thank you Debanutosh (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Debanutosh: Asu Dev website specifically forbids uploading images under free license to places like Wikipedia: "Materials (Text & Images) may be borrowed from the website, intended exclusively for Academic purpose only after obtaining prior permission/authorization from the author." MKFI (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Debanutosh: uploading images "for non commercial uses" is not allowed; all images must allow commercial use as well. See Commons:Licensing. MKFI (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not used anywhere and distorded crop Zblace (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Low-resolution duplicate of File:Selmoncenter usf.jpg IagoQnsi (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
As it turns out, the metadata reveals "BOGDAN CRACIUNESCU" as the copyright holder, yet the subject of the photo (i.e. the uploader) uploaded a photo of himself done by someone else. Emailing the subject about this.... George Ho (talk) 21:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
{{Fair use}} Mackle.td (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Why do you think it's still copyrighted, when the author died in 1914? --Túrelio (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- copyvio| not pd: https://www.thestoryoftexas.com/discover/artifacts/runaway-scrape-account Mackle.td (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Db-g7}} Mackle.td (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Public domain per US law; any claims by the website are not valid copyright when the original is already PD. That said, the resolution is too low to read the text, and image is unused. There is no copyright problem, but I would not object to deletion on grounds of not being useful to Commons scope. Also, @Mackle.td: do not renominate something when there is still an open deletion discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Infrogmation of New Orleans sorry about the renominations. Would it still be possible to delete since it is illegible? thank you so much, sorry Mackle.td (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation Mackle.td (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as unused and unusable due to poor resolution. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zuhaitz-art (talk · contribs)
[edit]To retain art on Commons requires COM:OTRS permission of the artist. These images are from at least three cameras, please provide names of actual photographers.
- File:Via crusis - 2020 - brou de noix sur papier - 32 x 24 cm b.jpg
- File:L1000196.jpg
- File:Antolatu - 2015 - platane - 150 x 75 x 50 cm.jpg
- File:ALEA III, la graine - 2015 - érable, platane, et galet de Guethary - 91 x 68 x 40 cm.jpg
- File:L'atelier de Zigor, Biarritz, 2021.jpg
- File:Olerki II - platane - 80 X 69 X 80 cm - 2002.jpg
- File:GURUTZE - LAHONCE - 2014 - 3.jpg
- File:DANTZA IV- LAHONCE - 2018.jpg
- File:GURUTZE XI croix - 2020 - chêne - 90 x 180 x 40 cm.jpg
- File:Irati - 2020.jpg
- File:LABAR II falaise - 2020 - acrylique sur toile - 116 x 218 cm.jpg
- File:OLERKI VII - BIARRITZ.jpg
- File:OLERKI II poéme - platane - 80 X 69 X 80 cm - 2002.jpg
- File:HEGA XII vol - 2017 - bronze - 95 x 104 x 64 cm socle 65 x 65 x 20 cm.jpg
- File:GURUTZE VIII - la croix - 2011 - bronze - 17 x 18 x 12,5 cm.jpg
- File:Zigor atelier - 2020.jpg
- File:Zigor.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be a website screenshot, possible that the portrait images are copyrighted.
- File:المؤتمر العالمي4.jpg
- File:المؤتمر العالمي3 1.jpg
- File:المؤتمر العالمي2 1.jpg
- File:المؤتمر العالمي 1.jpg
- File:المؤتمر الافتراضي.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images with no useful metadata, do not appear to be user's own work. The men seem to be a mix of selfies, professional photos and Zoom pictures.
- File:المستشارة هنادي المباركي.jpg
- File:نواف بن جمال.jpg
- File:صورة نواف.jpg
- File:الجامع.jpg
- File:Blilia.jpg
- File:الدكتور خالد.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in US for sculpture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this picture as a test for a sandbox project I was working on for a college class years ago. I'd now like it to be deleted. 71.167.185.100 01:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Facebook Mahmoud 191.125.32.2 01:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Quién es? 191.125.32.2 01:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashraf.alsaab 191.125.32.2 01:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Mahmoud Nofal, GBM Qatar 191.125.32.2 01:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; F10. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Instagram 191.125.32.2 01:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo of a photo. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Author Christine Kuncke Copyright holder christine kuncke 191.125.32.2 01:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? Es libre subir fotos de fotos? 191.125.32.2 01:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; photo of a photo. --Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? Es libre subir fotos de fotos? 191.125.32.2 01:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
copie de https://swiss-space-tourism.ch/votre-ticket-pour-lespace/ Habertix (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This photo is used during the opening credits for Saturday Night Live, so I highly doubt that this photo is compatible with Wikimedia Commons. The person who uploaded the photo is "ShermanSarah" but based on the cross wiki abuse I doubt it's actually her. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 01:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
"a work by yarden harel from private collection" Como puede estar sin OTRS? 191.125.32.2 02:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Foto con problemas. Scope? 191.125.32.2 02:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Tenemos File:Michal Rutkowski.jpg
Deleted: F7. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Quienes son? 191.125.32.2 02:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No vaild deletion reason: this user, propably in bad faith, even don't google file name. Matlin (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
En vez de acusar la gente con sospechas negativas, por qué mejor no se pone a categorizar sus archivos? Así sabríamos de quienes se tratan sus personajes... Gracias a esa persona mala Vd se ha acordado de hacer lo necesario, aunque tarde, no? Hasta nunca.
Keep No valid reason for deletion. Let's be civil in our language, please (and sign your comments). --Headlock0225 (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The watermark on the image restrics commercial usage Taterian (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- My bad. Taterian
Deleted: per nomination; CC-BY-NC per watermark; we don't accept the NC (non-commercial) restriction. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Levdr1lp as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=Image is not an advertisement, but one of many photos in a photo album which constitutes the publication. Copyright noted on page 3 of publication: "Compiled and Published by NATIONAL RADIO PERSONALITIES, Peoria, Illinois, Litho in U.S., Copyright 1939".
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- This is the original registration in 1939, so renewal would take place anywhere from 1965 to 1967. It is not listed in any of the renewals under both "WGAR personalities" or "national radio personalities inc.", so thus this is public domain by lack of renewal and should be Keep with the template {{PD-US-not renewed}} added. Sennecaster (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for verifying, Sennecaster. I can apply the tags and the information on the files accordingly. (Also of note, the pictures were extracted from a publication that was at the same time a promotional advertisement for the radio station, but since it is in the public domain, that explanation is a moot point.) Nathan Obral (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as per Sennecaster's rationale. Epicgenius (talk) 03:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Sennecaster. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Only used for vandalism; attempt to replace Colin Kaepernick's photo with this one. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 23:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Not an original work by {{Tasnim}}. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, uploaded by a user with a long history of copyvio 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history (many prior copyvios); seems to be a scrrenshot considering the Aparat word on the background 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Definitely not a {{Tasnim}} work! non-sense license tag. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Not a Tasnim News picture. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not an original work by {{Tasnim}}. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
NO FOP in France - Category:French FOP cases/pending JopkeB (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I am sorry, I now see that the artist himself was the uploader, so I withdraw this deletion request. JopkeB (talk) 15:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello JopkeB,
indeed, I own the copyright because I am the creator artist.
Thanks for correcting. --Alain Girelli (talk) 09:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Œuvre de fr:Alain Girelli et absence de liberté de panorama en France: une autorisation de l'artiste par OTRS/VRT est nécessaire. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 12:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Alain Girelli is born in 1948. No freedom of panorama in France. No OTRS. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 18:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no COM:FOP France, needs COM:VRT from the sculptor. -M.nelson (talk) 21:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Alain Girelli, Please send an email to VRT Team that you are indeed Alain girelli, the sculptor of this work. Otherwise your photos of your arwork will be nominated for deletion again and again. --JopkeB (talk) 02:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a copyrighted journal cover image owned by Science (the journal) or its parent company [[Wikipedia:American Association for the Advancement of Science| AAAS]]. This is not a public domain journal cover image by NASA. Is the editing by Science above COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I agree it is a copyvio and should be deleted as such. This image is a journal cover image owned by Science magazine or its parent organization. This publication is a scientific journal.
- Regarding the Threshold of originality question - if someone wants to write the United States Copyright Office for clarification, please feel free to do so. Otherwise, we editors should not say copyright is inapplicable unless it is very clear that is the case. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history (many copyvios) 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
These are photographs of three-dimensional public domain artworks from the National Museum in Warsaw. In general, photographs of 3D PD works are not automatically considered PD (see COM:ART). While the source site lists these works as being in the public domain, there's no clear indication that that applies to the photographs, and there's no evidence of the CC-BY-SA license claimed for most of these files. They still contain copyright notices in the metadata, and the footer links to what appears to be a restrictive license. Per Commons:National Museum in Warsaw the museum has collaborated on uploading files in the past, and based on the uploader's username they may be connected to the museum.
- File:Figurka boga Ozyrysa.jpg
- File:Figurka boga Thota o głowie ibisa.jpg
- File:Rzeźba bogini Nut.jpg
- File:Posąg bogini Sachmet (1).jpg
- File:Uszebti Psamtyk-sa-Neita.jpg
- File:Amulet Lew.jpg
- File:Baran.jpg
- File:Ibis amulet.jpg
- File:Maska mumiowa.jpg
- File:Pojemnik na kohol.jpg
- File:Talerz, Abu Roasz, Okres Wczesnodynastyczny.png
- File:Naczynie kuliste z tytulaturą Unisa.jpg
- File:Naczynie malowane.jpg
- File:Fragment posągu Amona.jpg
- File:Atlas okładka 2.png
- File:Atlas okładka 1.png
- File:Lis skradający się.jpg
- File:Figurka przepiórki.jpg
- File:Szafa kątowa.jpg
- File:Szafa XIX w.jpg
- File:Zrozpaczona przycisk na biurko.jpg
- File:Broszka Faberge.jpg
- File:Wazon - ikebana.jpg
- File:Krzesło gięte.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation. Low image resolution and missing EXIF data. Also Out of scope as private image collections. SCP-2000 03:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
https://www.vox.com/authors/dylan (copyright) 191.125.32.2 03:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
self promo on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uday.kampuzz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 07:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted album art Mbrickn (talk) 07:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Image is copyrighted artwork of the character "2B" Mbrickn (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KanbanizeInc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. Screenshots / graphics claimed as 'own work' but are derivative works. No usage on Wikimedia projects.
- File:Kanbanize Ltd..png
- File:Runtime Policies.png
- File:Kanbanize web.png
- File:Kanbanize logo.png
- File:Kanban Board.jpg
mattbr 07:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Swapan kumar dev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos
Afifa Afrin (talk) 08:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
It is with sadness that I must remak that this gif may be a copyright infringement, as it displays an excerpt from Hayao Miyazaki's motion picture "My Neighbour Totoro". Eunostos (talk) 22:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:41, 16 March 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: It is with sadness that I must remak that this gif may be a copyright infringement, as it displays an excerpt from Hayao Miyazaki's motion picture "My Neighbour Totoro" (Studio Ghibli Inc.), COM:GCSD (F1) --Krdbot 19:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Quién es? 191.125.32.2 01:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Inferior version of File:Interior of the Mausoleum Mausoleum of Mohammed V with a Koran reader (5508503031).jpg; COM:REDUNDANT EpicPupper (talk) 03:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![03:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/02/06#c-EpicPupper-2022-02-06T03:02:00.000Z-File:Image01.png".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, and not own work, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
![01:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/02/06#c-P199-2022-03-28T01:27:00.000Z-File:Image01.png".jpg){kind=link}
Recently uploaded .png that is redundant to File:Flag of the United States.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This redirect details an upload under a mistaken name, the file being redirected to is of Air Force general Edgar Chavarrie, not Michael J. Dugan, who looks like this. Appearing in image searches due to the redirect despite the image rename will cause identity confusion. SuperWIKI (talk) 04:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_Lieutenant_General_(LGEN)_Michael_J._Dugan_(uncovered).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
G7. Author or uploader request deletion Tze Chiang Hao (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Keine Lizenz eingegeben Frank John-Lorenz (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Lo subí por error PGAKP (talk) 07:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion,. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Own work, replaced with File:CoVid-19-hospitalizations-South-Africa-weekly.svg -- Jeandré, 2022-02-06t08:34z 08:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 08:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of existing image
ZKang123 (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
File contains nothing educational other than raw text, is therefore out of scope. 46.132.191.211 09:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nabil nagy99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
- File:صورة لاخصائي التغذية ابانوب البرت.jpg
- File:صورة لاخصائي التغذية ابانوب البرت و 2 اخريين من شركة روتابيوجين.jpg
--Alaa :)..! 09:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikeyhayes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work' and personal/promotional image. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. Appears to be a modified or malformed version for Kappa (Q735873)? No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
No free license in sourse site https://studizba.com/, no permission Venzz (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/File:Karacaköy
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 10:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Low quality //LevandeMänniska (talk), 10:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bechuu Honex Pablo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotional images that are outise the scope of this project. Commons is not a social media site.
Herby talk thyme 10:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Adding:
Another selfie with a full Wikipedia-style article text in its description. --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
there's a better version: File:B-Samedan-Baselgia-S-Peider.jpg Martin Sg. (talk) 11:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Karaikalportlogo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 11:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Kind of spam Krzysztof Popławski (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Komiwodzirey~ (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)żaden to spam i spamem nie-będzie
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic likely 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Violation du droit d'auteur : photo déjà publié sur https://duchamp.me/fr/ma-biographie Habertix (talk) 11:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Useless Picture... a blatant self promotion .. serves absolutely no purpose.. MUST BE DELETED ASAP 2405:201:6806:5065:D497:C0DD:75CB:310 12:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
![12:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/02/06#c-2405:201:6806:5065:D497:C0DD:75CB:310-2022-02-06T12:19:00.000Z-File:KHexEdit_0.8.6.png".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
![01:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/02/06#c-P199-2022-03-28T01:52:00.000Z-File:KHexEdit_0.8.6.png".jpg){kind=link}
Not a free image because the design has a significant degree of creativity that goes far beyond "simple geometric shapes or text". Premeditated (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
only used in a (now deleted) enwiki attack page. no encyclopedic value, private photo without conceivable use Kusma (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution and low quality version of Soyuz-MS-21-Mission-Patch.png, no need for this one in a wrong file format. Ras67 (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
I will rather ask for speedy deletion that was temporary for Wikipedia commons, Ras67.Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos from Soyuz MS missions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
No educational value. Out of project scope. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hiwilms as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2|2=This is a title screen of a TV program. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_egyedi_lenyomat.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_egyedi_lenyomat.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have better picture about this stamping. Heyjoe.hu (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Országos Kéktúra pecsételőhely Zalaszántó (Sztúpa és Kéktúra) összesített lenyomat.jpg (but what about copyrights? are these designs not copyrighted???). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_%C3%B6sszes%C3%ADtett_lenyomat.jpg){kind=link}
Wunsch des Einstellers. Mediatus (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Wunsch des Einstellers Mediatus (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Image pre-dates its upload to Commons, eg https://www.teepublic.com/sticker/26093366-cat-lover-cat. May be public domain but this isn't stated. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, The Image is Originally owned by Canva, not teepublic, and since canva is a public domain with a copyright free policy, it's can be used.... Juliusijidola0 (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, can you link to a source that confirms that? --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, here https://www.canva.com/design/DAE3lp4THkM/k0yCacS-5KQzPQBSq4EGFg/view?utm_content=DAE3lp4THkM&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=homepage_design_menu Juliusijidola0 (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Afraid I can only see a picture of a cat with some share and navigation hover links at the bottom. Where does it say that the image is public domain? --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, here https://www.canva.com/design/DAE3lp4THkM/k0yCacS-5KQzPQBSq4EGFg/view?utm_content=DAE3lp4THkM&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=homepage_design_menu Juliusijidola0 (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, can you link to a source that confirms that? --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd say that licence was incompatible with Commons:Licensing for a couple of reasons:
- "If a photo, music or video file contains an identifiable person, place, logo or trademark, please ensure you check the image source or contact us if you’re unsure. We can’t guarantee that any free images, music and video files have the appropriate releases for commercial use." (their bold) means they can't be sure that the content they're hosting is copyright-free to begin with.
- "Don’t sell unaltered copies of a photo, music or video file e.g. don’t sell it as a stock photo, music or video file, poster, print or on a physical product without adding any value." and "Don’t redistribute or sell the photos, music or video on other stock media platforms." both limit the reuse of this image: we would have to add those same caveats to the Commons image, which is against policy. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd say that licence was incompatible with Commons:Licensing for a couple of reasons:
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Это мой файл, фото меня, я его загрузил и передумал. Я хочу удалить. Артём Марандич (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOY, the figurine in this photograph is most likely copyrighted. 46.132.191.211 16:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Ideally on Minecraft (franchise) we would have an image of all toys/plushies/whatnot together. Whether or not that would be okay to upload to commons... I don't know. SWinxy (talk) 18:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing this out! I was unaware and whilst I'm away at the moment I'd appreciate if somebody could transfer it to the English Wikipedia under CC BY SA 4.0 and fair use - if this isn't done I'll do it when I return home. Ed6767 (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom Di (they-them) (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
No es el estadio de Matute, sino que es el estadio Nacional del Perú. Además es una imagen duplicada de esta otra imagen. Por otra parte no es un trabajo propio como está indicado, sino que es un diseño del IPD. Carlos Pozo (talk) 19:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Looks like a professional photo. Unlikely to be created by uploader who claimed "own work". George Ho (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not found using TinEye and Google Images. Moreover, image fits pattern and style of other uploads by this user. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
The redirect is irrelevant because it is not the matute stadium, so it must be removed. Carlos Pozo (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of releasing the file under CC license, COM:OTRS is needed. A09090091 (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
"Source: Random Savannah in Africa" Unreliable uploader. (Note: image in use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
The underlying video is CC-BY 3.0, however we cannot be sure that this picture is itself covered by that license. The picture is probably used in the video under Fair Use or the Moroccan equivalent. firefly ( t · c ) 21:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, I highly doubt this is the uploader's original work, even if passed through a filter, it's still derivative work, the YouTube channel seems to have nothing to do with Aourram's family, which I believe is responsible for the creation of the image. -MakhzenHuman (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). Description and the caption on it:Mesoraca say this photo is from the 1950s, possibly own work. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
user:Contentboer
[edit]- File:GARANT Gruppe logo.svg
- File:Hauptsitz der GARANT Gruppe in Rheda-Wiedenbrück.jpg
- File:Logo Lauten Stiftung.jpg
- File:Logo Möbel Akademie.jpg
Very unlikely to be own work. Yet also File:Josef Lauten.jpg is named own work, but it's in DR. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope logos. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Unknown author and source. — Redboston 22:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of Beale 1.SVG Frunsorl (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of Beale 2.SVG Frunsorl (talk) 22:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of Beale 3.SVG Frunsorl (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_Cortile_interno.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cortile_interno.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1 = Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_Cortile_interno.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_Cortile_interno.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1 = Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Palazzo Ducale (Genova) piano superiore ingresso Mostre Gramsci - Ultimo spenga la luce 2016.jpg
[edit]_piano_superiore_ingresso_Mostre_Gramsci_-_Ultimo_spenga_la_luce_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_piano_superiore_ingresso_Mostre_Gramsci_-_Ultimo_spenga_la_luce_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1 = Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1 = Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1 = Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (Copyrighted). Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (Copyrighted). Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyrighted). Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_convegno_anniversario_30_anni_da_Cernobyl_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_convegno_anniversario_30_anni_da_Cernobyl_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1 = Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_convegno_anniversario_30_anni_da_Cernobyl_2016.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_convegno_anniversario_30_anni_da_Cernobyl_2016.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyrighted). Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_Brassai_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brassai_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyrighted). Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_Brassai_2016.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_Brassai_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Flashback_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Flashback_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted poster. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Flashback_2016.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Flashback_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Visioni_per_Genova_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Visioni_per_Genova_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted poster. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Visioni_per_Genova_2016.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Visioni_per_Genova_2016.jpg){kind=link}
_Cortile_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Ultimo_spenga_la_luce_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cortile_esterno_ingresso_Mostra_Ultimo_spenga_la_luce_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted poster. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_mostra_tessuti_d%27artista_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_mostra_tessuti_d%27artista_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted poster. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_mostra_tessuti_d'artista_2016.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
_mostra_tessuti_d'artista_2016.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Mvcg66b3r as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "own work". COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Мною сделана более совершенная карта Пётр Тарасьев (talk) 18:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Мною сделана более совершенная карта Пётр Тарасьев (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Карта Древней Греции (северная часть)3.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
3.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
problematic file Cephas (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Cephas: what is the problem? Can it be fixed by just uploading a new version? The file is in extensive use already, so I prefer not deleting it... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think this deletion request is an error. The map correspond to what is on IUCN website. The author of this request should justify himself. --Cephas (talk) 23:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: "deletion request is an error". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Humulus~frwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]œuvres d'Alain Juno (voir son site https://alainjuno.fr/galerie.php#), une autorisation de l'artiste par OTRS/VRT est nécessaire.
- File:Le Miroir des Passions, Axelle et le Jaguar (Alainjuno).jpg
- File:"Récréation de votre Imaginaire" d'Alainjuno.jpg
- File:Alainjuno-abstrait-2019.jpg
- File:Alainjuno-Performance-Villeneuve-Loubet2018.jpg
- File:"Paysage"d'Alainjuno.jpg
- File:"Trois orphelins de Baan Nam Kehm" d'Alainjuno - Action Art Tsunami.jpg
- File:"Habit de Croisette, Rêverie cannoise" d'Alainjuno.jpg
- File:"Qu'Anna (bis)" d'Alainjuno.jpg
- File:"La Porte des Couleurs" d'Alainjuno.jpg
- File:"Portées de Barques" d'Alainjuno.jpg
- File:Alainjuno2012.jpg
- File:Alainjuno - Exposition à Atlanta (1982).jpg
- File:Alainjuno-FacesDeClowns-2015.png
- File:Alainjuno-2013.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22_d%27Alainjuno.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Habertix (talk) 12:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Humulus~frwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images without EXIF data or with transmission code as metadata (unlike other uploads by this user).
- File:Alain Girelli, en compagnie de Jordi Casals et Alainjuno (Villeneuve-Loubet, 2015).jpg
- File:ThierryLopez2018.jpg
- File:ThierryLopez2017-NB.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Actually, This is a Fictitious Indonesian Television Logo. Not a Real Logo 223.255.225.71 02:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE, currently in use in three Wikipedia language versions. Per Commons policy, you first have to argue there that the logo is not real, and then, if it is no longer in use anywhere, you could file a new deletion request. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright All right reserved | Theme: ePortfolio by ThemeInWP. 191.125.32.2 02:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Poland, the boilerplate copyright notice is for the website, the website contains images gathered from multiple sources and have to be examined on their own merits. We encounter this all the time, certain website creation software programs stamp each page with a boilerplate copyright notice. --RAN (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyrighted). Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
But the criterium you posted says "This does not apply to photographs taken in a public place". So? --Superchilum(talk to me!) 16:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Ok, now I understand (for that reason now this is a deletion request instead of speedy). Can Commons:De minimis be applied? --Superchilum(talk to me!) 16:57, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Screen would need to be blanked. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. — Redboston 22:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia. — Redboston 22:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lord Belbury as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo features official character artwork. Should be discussed regarding COM:TOO US. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Wasn't a file like this deleted some time ago? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 17:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This file was determined to be above TOO in the past and deleted. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I've checked and there has not been any previous DR with significant discussion on this logo (also note that a lot of deleted images are of more complex character art). Anyways, it is well-established that letters in a custom font are not copyrightable, so the only potentially copyrightable portion is the crewmate "A". Everything other than the backpack is just stylization of a block "A", while the backpack is just a single curved line. I do not see this as a more complex stylization than the "A" in File:Los Angeles Football Club.svg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per King of Hearts. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
This is a press photo, used in a government publication which provides credit to "World Wide Photos." It shows up on newspaper.com April 2, 1979 credited as an AP photo.[1] Perhaps there is some other license that can be used, but it is not PD-USGov. Dual Freq (talk) 23:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Diese Wappendatei kann gelöscht werden, es existiert eine exzellente SVG-Datei von diesem dargestellten Wappen (DE-ST_15-0-83-040_Meitzendorf_COA.svg). Alle Verlinkungen zu den unterschiedlichen Wikipedien sind mit der SVG-Version verknüpft und die PNG-Datei wird daher nicht mehr genutzt und kann entfernt werden. Beide Dateien zeigen einunddasselbe Wappen von Meitzendorf. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 14:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No, the coat of arms isn't duplicate, it are different file types due to history. Its usage may still be possible, so this deletion request doesn't agree to COM:Scope, the coat of arms is within project scope. No valid reason for deletion. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Doc Taxon. --Rosenzweig τ 22:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Diese Wappendatei kann gelöscht werden, es existiert eine exzellente SVG-Datei von diesem dargestellten Wappen (DE-ST_15-0-83-323_Morsleben_COA.svg). Alle Verlinkungen zu den unterschiedlichen Wikipedien sind mit der SVG-Version verknüpft und die PNG-Datei wird daher nicht mehr genutzt und kann entfernt werden. Beide Dateien zeigen einunddasselbe Wappen von Morsleben. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 16:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No, the coat of arms isn't duplicate, it are different file types due to history. Its usage may still be possible, so this deletion request doesn't agree to COM:Scope, the coat of arms is within project scope. No valid reason for deletion. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Doc Taxon. --Rosenzweig τ 22:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Diese Wappendatei kann gelöscht werden, es existiert eine exzellente PNG-Datei von diesem dargestellten Wappen (DE-ST_15-0-83-390_Niedere_Boerde_COA.png). Alle Verlinkungen zu den unterschiedlichen Wikipedien sind mit der PNG-Version verknüpft und die JPG-Datei wird daher nicht mehr genutzt und kann entfernt werden. Beide Dateien zeigen einunddasselbe Wappen von Niedere Börde. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No, the coat of arms isn't duplicate, it are different file types due to history. Its usage may still be possible, so this deletion request doesn't agree to COM:Scope, the coat of arms is within project scope. No valid reason for deletion. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Doc Taxon. --Rosenzweig τ 22:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Diese Wappendatei kann gelöscht werden, es existiert eine exzellente SVG-Datei von diesem dargestellten Wappen (DE-ST_15-0-83-040_Barleben_1993_COA.svg). Alle Verlinkungen zu den unterschiedlichen Wikipedien sind mit der SVG-Version verknüpft und die PNG-Datei wird daher nicht mehr genutzt und kann entfernt werden. Beide Dateien zeigen einunddasselbe Wappen von Barleben. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 13:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No, the coat of arms isn't duplicate, it are different file types due to history. Its usage may still be possible, so this deletion request doesn't agree to COM:Scope, the coat of arms is within project scope. No valid reason for deletion. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Doc Taxon. --Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Diese Wappendatei kann gelöscht werden, es existiert eine exzellente SVG-Datei von diesem dargestellten Wappen (DE-ST_15-0-83-040_Ebendorf_COA.svg). Alle Verlinkungen zu den unterschiedlichen Wikipedien sind mit der SVG-Version verknüpft und die PNG-Datei wird daher nicht mehr genutzt und kann entfernt werden. Beide Dateien zeigen einunddasselbe Wappen von Ebendorf. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 13:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No, the coat of arms isn't duplicate, it are different file types due to history. Its usage may still be possible, so this deletion request doesn't agree to COM:Scope, the coat of arms is within project scope. No valid reason for deletion. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Doc Taxon. --Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Diese Wappendatei kann gelöscht werden, es existiert eine exzellente SVG-Datei von diesem dargestellten Wappen (DE-ST_15-0-83-205_Erxleben_COA.svg). Alle Verlinkungen zu den unterschiedlichen Wikipedien sind mit der SVG-Version verknüpft und die PNG-Datei wird daher nicht mehr genutzt und kann entfernt werden. Beide Dateien zeigen einunddasselbe Wappen von Erxleben. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 13:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep No, the coat of arms isn't duplicate, it are different file types due to history. Its usage may still be possible, so this deletion request doesn't agree to COM:Scope, the coat of arms is within project scope. No valid reason for deletion. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Doc Taxon. --Rosenzweig τ 18:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
AI upscale of existing photo. Retouched. Image not available at source CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Retouched of free licensed media; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
watermarked to https://www.renegomezphotography.com, unlikely to be own work AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 05:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The user name (renelibrary) matches the image credit in the watermark (renegomezphotography.com). Probably the same person. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Das ist keine Klitoris und es handelt sich um eine URV. This is not a clitoris and the upload is a copyright-violation.
Image source Sciencia58 (talk) 12:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Das Foto wurde in der Science photo library offensichtlich falsch beschriftet, außerdem ist die Nutzung kostenpflichtig. Es hätte nicht in die Public domain gegeben werden dürfen. Dann wäre es nicht passiert, dass so viele Wikipedia-Artikel diese unsauberen und missgebildeten Körperteile mit hässlichen Hauttumoren als angebliche Klitoris verwenden. Wir haben genügend gute Fotos von echten Klitoris. Dieses Bild erfüllt keinen wissenschaftlichen Zweck, da wir zu dem krankhaften Befund bei diesem aufgedunsenen Mikropenis keine Quellenangabe und somit keine mitgelieferte Diagnose haben. Es könnte sich eventuell auch um einen Fall von Clitoromegaly handeln. Auch dann hat das Bild keine Berechtigung als Beispiel für eine normale Klitoris. Außerdem sieht man hier eine Phimose und an der Eichel eine Entzündung. Das Bild stammt aus der Pathologie. Ohne Diagnose mit wissenschaftlicher Quellenangabe erfüllt es für uns keinen Zweck, ganz abgesehen davon, dass wir es nicht verwenden dürfen.
The photo was obviously mislabelled in the Science photo library, and there is a charge for its use. It should not have been put into the public domain. Then it would not have happened that so many Wikipedia articles use these unclean and malformed body parts with ugly skin tumours as alleged clitoris. We have enough good photos of real clitorises. This picture does not serve any educational purpose, because we have no source reference and thus no accompanying diagnosis for this obviously pathological finding on a bloated micropenis. It could possibly also be a case of clitoromegaly. Even then, the picture has no justification as an example of a normal clitoris. In addition, you can see a phimosis and an inflammation on the glans. The picture comes from pathology. Without a diagnosis with a scientific source, it serves no purpose for us, not to mention that we are not allowed to use it. Sciencia58 (talk) 13:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete apparent blatant copyright violation by unreliable uploader. Science library photo is not free licensed. Archive org does not have a copy allowing history of that webpage to confirm it was never free licensed, but a quick look at Commons uploader @Psychonaught: 's deleted uploads gives me serious doubts that they are a truthful uploader; some rather absurd claims of authorship of photos taken from 3rd party sources. (User:Psychonaught seems not to have been active here since 2014. I suggest their uploads be looked at for more dubious claims. Rather distressing that this image has been in fairly wide use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)- Delete COM:PORN Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
cancellare per motivi di DIRITTI IMMAGINE RAI Italia6 (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Not a free image because the design has a significant degree of creativity that goes far beyond "simple geometric shapes or text". Premeditated (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: questionable, uncategorized, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
_Mostra_Lisetta_Carmi_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Mostra_Lisetta_Carmi_2016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1 = Copyrighted advertisement. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
_Mostra_Lisetta_Carmi_2016.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. F3 states "This does not apply to photographs taken in a public place". --Msbbb (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment it's unclear to me, what is the problem here? The photo (by Lisetta Carmi?) may be copyrighted but also could fall under De minimis, the title "Lisetta Carmi" is clearly under the TOO. We are in a grey area and I'm not convinced it's too dark grey to need deletion (it seems a bit of abuse of the precautionary principle). PS: there is no FOP in Italy but it's not really relevant here. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: as noted, no FOP in Italy. Photo of a photo DW is signifcant portion of image; image shows little of significance other than the DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
_Mostra_Lisetta_Carmi_2016.jpg){kind=link}
This file was discussed in COM:VPCOPY. One or two editors said the shapes are simple and wouldn't be eligible for copyright. However, Commons has no info about Thailand's originality threshold on Commons. Fortunately, I found one source about logos saying, "The required level of originality or creativity is minimal." It also uses court cases as examples. In the case of this file, "simple" shapes forming a fist may be original or creative enough for Thai courts. George Ho (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 13:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Siegfried Fuhrmann
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:2000 K3 Kampnagelfabrik Hamburg.jpg
- File:2004 HOMUNKULUS Kuenstlerhaus HH Bergedorf.jpg
- File:2004 Server Installation Kunsthaus Hamburg.jpg
- File:2007 Install zus m A Bromma Sootboern Hamburg.jpg
- File:2012 Installation im Eiskeller Altona Hamburg.jpg
- File:2013 Beispiel Folien-Knoepfgrafik ueber Zeichnung.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Was muss ich tun? Was habe ich falsch gemacht? Hilfe.
- Jahrelang haben die Bilder gut in WP funktioniert. Die Arbeit am Artikel hatte ich längst abgeschrieben. Jetzt wird wieder alles aufgerollt. Das ist der Grund, warum in WP gar keine Lust mehr habe nur irgend etwas zu tun. Warum konnten Fragen, die Du an mich stellst nicht gleich u Beginn gestellt werden.
- Ich habe manchmal das Gefühl, WP wird durch das Engagement wie dieses von Dir absichtlich gestört um Menschen wie mich von der Mitarbeit fernzuhalten.
- Und dabei habe ich es - auch - mit diesem Artikel nur gut gemeint + und in diesem speziellem Fall einen Künstler gefeatured, der das niemals selbst getan hätte. Scoid (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Sg. Bitte erkläre: copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Scoid (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Es liegt eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vor. Die Dateien hier müssen gemeinfrei sein – Abbildungen künstlerischer Werke erlangen den Status 70 Jahre nach dem Ableben ihres Schöpfers, oder durch explizite Freigabe durch diesen selbst oder die Rechteinhaber (siehe Commons:VRT/de), oder aber, sie genießen Panoramafreiheit – des aber gilt in Deutschland explizit nicht für Innenräume von Museen, Kirchen u. a. --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Sg. Welche Lizenz zur Gemeinfreiheit passt denn am besten, wenn {{Cc-by-3.0}} nicht reicht? Scoid (talk) 12:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Es liegt eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vor. Die Dateien hier müssen gemeinfrei sein – Abbildungen künstlerischer Werke erlangen den Status 70 Jahre nach dem Ableben ihres Schöpfers, oder durch explizite Freigabe durch diesen selbst oder die Rechteinhaber (siehe Commons:VRT/de), oder aber, sie genießen Panoramafreiheit – des aber gilt in Deutschland explizit nicht für Innenräume von Museen, Kirchen u. a. --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We would need COM:VRT permissions for all of the artworks shown. @Scoid: Es geht hier nicht um den Lizenzbaustein für die Bilder, sondern darum, dass die gezeigten Kunstwerke ihrerseits geschützt sind, und zwar während der Lebenszeit ihrer Urheber (die Künstler) sowie weitere 70 Jahre nach deren Tod. Solange darfst du die zwar normalerweise schon fotografieren, aber die Fotos dann eben nicht für alle Zwecke inkl. kommerzielle freigeben, wie wir das hier fordern. Daher können wir solche Fotos hier nur mit dokumentierter Freigabe der Künstler akzeptieren, und die fehlt hier. Mehr unter COM:VRT. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). Redundant raster thumbnail of File:Eigersund komm.svg AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Файл Герб Комунны Эгерзунд взят соследующего источника:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigersund
- Лицензия:This official Norwegian coat of arms is ineligible for copyright, but its usage is restricted according to Norwegian penal law, independent of the copyright status of the depiction shown here.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eigersund_komm.svg
- То есть изображение этого герба не является объектом авторского права. К тому же он уже опубликован в Википедии. Одд Стрела (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Werner von Basil as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo design lt. Webseite: Logo design: Katrin Lewinsky and Felix von Boehm https://tinybe.org/impressum/ = ungleich Hochladende May be PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I had assumed that this one did not reach the threshold of originality. But if it's explicitly copyrighted, that's a different matter of course. --217.239.4.223 20:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be below COM:TOO Germany (which considers this logo to be PD). -M.nelson (talk) 21:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:08, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
This isn't a real vector image; it's just a PNG embedded inside an SVG. I have now uploaded that PNG as a separate file (File:South Florida Bulls wordmark.png), so there is no need to keep this misleading file anymore (we can just redirect this filename to that PNG). IagoQnsi (talk) 20:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and redirected to PNG. --Rosenzweig τ 12:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ultimo90novanta (talk · contribs)
[edit]This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). Files are tagged own work/CC-BY-SA-4.0, most date to the 1950s.
- File:Via roma mesoraca.jpg
- File:Vergari iumara.jpg
- File:Castello 2 anni 50 .jpg
- File:Centro storico mesoraca anziani.jpg
- File:Villetta mesoraca.jpg
- File:Ponte mesoraca vergari 1.jpg
- File:Ponte mesoraca.jpg
- File:Mesoraca lito.jpg
- File:Mesoraca panorama 2.jpg
- File:Mesoraca anni 50.jpg
- File:Mesoraca cipresso.jpg
- File:Mesoraca panorama 50.jpg
- File:Mesorsca belvedere.jpg
- File:Edificio scolastico mesoraca.jpg
- File:Sant'antonio mesoraca.jpg
- File:Stemma mesoraca 3d.jpg
- File:Sigillo dell’università di Mesoraca..jpg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy. Italy only awards 20 years of protection, and these postcards all are from prior to 2002. They also have a license for the scan which is a derivative copy. I am assuming that the nominator is expecting to see the status for the original object, which is PD-Italy. --RAN (talk) 01:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no information about orginal works. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect pronunciation, so not reasonably useful for any project. Replaceable by File:LL-Q1860 (eng)-Back ache-whilst.wav. — SGconlaw (talk) 11:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use at pl.wiktionary (probably the correct pronunciation for Polish). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @P199: I had removed it from pl.wiktionary but it was wrongly added back by a bot. The pl.wiktionary entry is of the English and not a Polish word, so it is an incorrect pronunciation. As long as the file remains undeleted, bots will keep adding them to entries. — SGconlaw (talk) 04:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Reopening this deletion request. The file contains an incorrect pronunciation and is thus not reasonably useful for any project. I have removed it from places where it is used, but so long as the file remains undeleted it seems that bots keep re-adding it to entries. — SGconlaw (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- After this edition the bot will no longer add it. Olaf (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Olaf: ah, thanks! — SGconlaw (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @SGconlaw now that the bot issue is resolved, do you still think this file should be deleted? Does it have any potential educational purpose? -M.nelson (talk) 21:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- @M.nelson: yes, the file should still be deleted. It is a completely incorrect pronunciation that no one uses. — SGconlaw (talk) 21:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I agree with Deletion as out of COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I agree with
- @M.nelson: yes, the file should still be deleted. It is a completely incorrect pronunciation that no one uses. — SGconlaw (talk) 21:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope, not used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). Not sure what this is exactly, but based on Google Translate's lackluster attempt, I think it might be some sort of official document. Might be PD, depending on country of origin. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 13:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I appreciate Jamelle Dolphin illustrating a record store displaying her relative John Dolphin, one of the Penguins band members a late record producer. However, I'm uncertain whether the photographer/author and the uploader are the same person. Must've been taken from one of newspaper or magazine clippings. George Ho (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC); corrected, 22:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This photo is from grandfather who regularly had professional photographers to take pictures as the store was in operation. This particular one has been edit to add annotations to help viewers better know and understand what's going on in the photo. This photo came from my grandmothers collection in which there are have many more well professional pics from the store, I have them on there original photo sheets from the 1950s. I would love to put more of those photos up to be seen but wikipedia just isn't the place for a photo gallery, so I just choose a few that seemed relevant for this page.
- Thanks
- Jamelle 2603:8000:B101:391E:88B1:DF1:9D4E:A71D 18:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Jamelle, or Ms. Diamond. I wonder whether you know or have found the names of photo agencies (or professional photographers) whom your
fathergrandfather hired. That would be nice. If not, has the photo been public before, or does the photo have timestamps on back? If previously published, have you found newspapers or magazines or any other previously using this un-annotated photo? Thanks. BTW, Wikimedia Commons doesn't have to use photos for just Wikipedia. Anybody can use a photo stored in Commons for use outside Wikipedia or the internet. --George Ho (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC); corrected, 22:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC) - A radio station's article credits "Dolphin Family" as the photo's courtesy. George Ho (talk) 00:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Jamelle, or Ms. Diamond. I wonder whether you know or have found the names of photo agencies (or professional photographers) whom your
Deleted: per nomination. Regrettable, the uploader did not give evidence to show the copyright is owned by her or her grandfather/family. Therefore, the image, made by a hired photographer, must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 20:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=679661254#File:Record_Shop(Inside).jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Gael.rabbe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copies de correspondance privée, reproduites sans l'autorisation des auteurs
- File:Madame Anne GRUNER SCHLUMBERGER-02.jpg
- File:Expert Sculptures 19°-20° siècles Membre de l'union Française des Experts PARIS Mr Jacques Ginépro.png
- File:Alexandrian-02.jpg
Habertix (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Pouvez-vous m'aider à faire accepter les différentes images que j'ai introduit sur Wikipédia pour la page d'Alain Girelli ?
- Je ne comprends pas les différentes licence qu'il y a sur Wikipédia et Wikipédia n'ont pas accepter l'autorisation d'Alain Girelli à mettre ses images (et ses montages).
- Est-ce que c'est les "montages" qui bloque ?
- Pour la majorité des photos c'est la femme d'Alain Girelli qui les a prise.
- Pour les lettres, les auteurs sont morts pour la plupart, Que faire ?
- Merci 102.118.68.53 14:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Missing permission from the authors of the letters, which are likely still copyrighted per COM:FRANCE (70 years pma). @102.118.68.53/@Gael.rabbe: Nous avons besoin de permission de la personne qui a créé l'œuvre (l'auteur du lettre ou le photographe). -M.nelson (talk) 21:38, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Gael.rabbe: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holders/writers to publish these images on Commons with a free license. If successful, the images can be undeleted.
Translated with Google translate: @Gael.rabbe: veuillez suivre attentivement la procédure sur VRT pour montrer que vous avez l'autorisation des détenteurs de droits d'auteur/auteurs de publier ces images sur Commons avec une licence gratuite. En cas de succès, les images peuvent être restaurées. --Ellywa (talk) 13:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Extracted from a copyrighted work 𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 17:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- This work is extracted from a street banner photograph, which grants permission under "Freedom of Panorama". Magurale (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Freedom of Panorama doesn't include copyrighted works. --𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 10:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Under article 40 of the copyright law of Turkey:
- Works of fine arts permanently placed on public streets, avenues or squares may be reproduced by drawings, graphics, photographs and the like, distributed, shown by projection in public premises or broadcast by radio or similar means. For architectural works, this freedom is only valid for the exterior form. Magurale (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Freedom of Panorama doesn't include copyrighted works. --𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 10:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be taken from a billboard, which typically are not "permanently placed", so doesn't meet COM:FOP Turkey. -M.nelson (talk) 17:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Moj}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Fars}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Parsa 2au (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Probably exceeds the threshold of originality. Putting bull horns on a letter U is an original design that I don't think would be considered common property; it bears similar complexity to en:File:Prince logo.svg, which is above the threshold. IagoQnsi (talk) 20:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was discussed in COM:VPCOPY. One or two editors said the shapes are simple and wouldn't be eligible for copyright. However, Commons has no info about Thailand's originality threshold on Commons. Fortunately, I found one source about logos saying, "The required level of originality or creativity is minimal." It also uses court cases as examples.
In the case of this file, the heart-shaped logo must have been one of oval-looking shapes bending itself to look like a heart. Also, the red border surrounds white and blue borders; in order from outer to inner, red-white-blue. Furthermore, the shape looks computer-generated with shadows. I'd say the logo looks "minimal" enough for Thai courts. George Ho (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:TOO Thailand, the level of originality required for copyright protection is (very) low in this country. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creative effort of the designer. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyrighted). Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:FOP Italy, there is no FoP in Italy. This sculpture is a modern design, so it cannot be maintained as the author might still be living or has not died sufficiently long ago. --Ellywa (talk) 14:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not the work of Tasmin News - previously published on https://www.babnet.net/festivaldetail-193206.asp King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
