Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![46 File:2014 - Little Mix "Salute" (Sheffield Motorpoint Arena) Little Mix (14330062292) Leigh-Anne.jpg](#File:2014_-_Little_Mix_"Salute"_(Sheffield_Motorpoint_Arena)_Little_Mix_(14330062292)_Leigh-Anne.jpg){kind=link}
._Universal_Pictures_publicity_photo._Joyce_Holden_as_Georgia_Codray.jpg){kind=link}
_Island,_Japan_-_July_6th,_2020.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.pdf_-_WPS_Office_2021_10_23_15_22_02.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_deutscher_Pelzanbieter_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by 台灣公車代理商股份有限公司 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sock of User:鄭啟民, history of uploading non-{{Own}} works, five different cameras in short time span.
- File:首都客運 738-FW 292.jpg
- File:首都客運 690-U5 民生幹線.jpg
- File:首都客運 805-FW 284.jpg
- File:Airbus Xinyi AH935.jpg
- File:Airbus Xinyi 056AD.jpg
- File:Shin Bus Route 1.jpg
- File:Shin Bus Route 252.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-FAA161.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-846FX.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-845FX.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-475FW.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-318FR.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-567FZ.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-705U3.jpg
- File:806-U3 欣欣客運 123路 貓熊專車 20140119(簽).jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-802U3.jpg
- File:Capital Bus 685-FG and Shinshin 267-FP 20140119.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-806U3.jpg
- File:595-FZ 欣欣客運 236路(區間) 東南科大→公館 20140112(簽).jpg
- File:HINO - HS8JRVL - KKA-0582.jpg
- File:HINO - HS8JRVL - KKA-0585.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-280FR.jpg
- File:Danan Bus KKA-0833 at MRT Yuanshan Station bus shelter 20201214c.jpg
- File:YOUTONG-ZK6128HG-081FR.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E6%9D%B1%E5%8D%97%E7%A7%91%E5%A4%A7%E2%86%92%E5%85%AC%E9%A4%A8_20140112(%E7%B0%BD).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mys_721tx (talk) 05:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Out of scope files, created by a sockpuppet (Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 94#Emperor1991z is uploading, disruptive editing, account creation forming massive sockpuppeting for Yuiyui2001). If these are based on copyrighted logos, then possible derivative work copyvios too.
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (HK PlayStation).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (TW PlayStation).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (CN PlayStation).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (KR Xbox).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (FR Xbox).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (UK Xbox).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (JP Nintendo).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (US Nintendo).png
- File:Gentlemen (VN PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (SG PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (TH PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (PH Steam).png
- File:Gentlemen (MY PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (ID PlayStation).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]More contributions by a now-blocked sockpuppet. The maps themselves seem to be original research works with no references to back up the information presented by the maps.
- File:Ph fil IBC.png
- File:Ph fil PTV.png
- File:Ph fil RPN.png
- File:Ph fil GMA.png
- File:Ph fil GMA Regional TV.png
- File:Ph fil TV5.png
- File:Ph fil Regional5.png
- File:Ph fil ABS-CBN Regional.png
- File:Ph fil ABS-CBN.png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Out of scope, COM:NOTUSED. Unused "super maps" created by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:PH Super Map.png
- File:Visayas Red (Super Version).png
- File:Mindanao Red (Super Version).png
- File:Luzon Island Red (Super Version).png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-Detail Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-2010-17-10-2 Super Version.png
- File:Blank-map PHMunicipalities Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-noborders Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-regions Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-ProvinceBorders Super Version.png
- File:Filipinas Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines Super Version.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 4
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (unused maps), created by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:IBC 10-DXSI Cagayan de Oro coverage area.png
- File:IBC 13-DXML Davao coverage area.png
- File:IBC 13-DYLA Cebu coverage area.png
- File:IBC 12-DYBQ Iloilo coverage area.png
- File:IBC DYRG Kalibo coverage area.png
- File:IBC DYSJ Antique coverage area.png
- File:IBC 2-DYJJ Roxas coverage area.png
- File:IBC 13 Laoag.png
- File:IBC 13 Manila coverage area.png
- File:IBC 6 Baguio coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXKS Surigao coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXDX GenSan coverage area.png
- File:RPN9-DXKT Davao coverage area.png
- File:RPN5-DXKO CDO coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXKP Pagadian coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXKD Dipolog coverage area.png
- File:RPN5-DXXX Zamboanga coverage area.png
- File:RPN9-DYKC Cebu coverage area.png
- File:RPN8-DYKB Bacolod coverage area.png
- File:RPN10-DZKI Iriga coverage area.png
- File:RPN DZTG Tuguegarao coverage area.png
- File:RPN12-DZBS Baguio coverage area.png
- File:RPN DZRL Batac coverage area.png
- File:RPN9 Manila coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Manila coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Caraga coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Bangsamoro coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Soccsksargen coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Northern Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Davao coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Zamboanga Peninsula coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Eastern Visayas coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Central Visayas coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Western Visayas coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Bicol coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Mimaropa coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Calabarzon coverage area.png
- File:PTV Central Luzon coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Cordillera coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Ilocos coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Cagayan Valley coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Caraga coverage area.png
- File:TV5 South Central Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 North Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 South Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 West Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Central Visayas Coverage area.png
- File:TV5 East Visayas coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Negros coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Panay coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Bicol coverage area.png
- File:TV5 North Luzon coverage area.png
- File:TV5 South Luzon coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Central Luzon coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Ilocos coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Manila coverage area.png
- File:GMA Eastern Visayas coverage area.png
- File:GMA Palawan coverage area.png
- File:GMA Batangas coverage area.png
- File:GMA Tuguegarao coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Manila coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Cotabato coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Butuan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Gensan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Davao coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Pagadian coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Zamboanga coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN CDO coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Tacloban coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Bacolod coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Iloilo coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Cebu coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Palawan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Naga coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Batangas coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Isabela coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Pampanga coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Dagupan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Baguio coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Laoag coverage area.png
- File:BBC (Radio Network).png
- File:IBC (Radio Network).png
- File:RPN (Radio Network).png
- File:PBS (Radio Network).png
- File:PH Public (Radio Network) Blank.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Blank.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 5
[edit]Unused graphics of "test cards" (categorized under Category:Formula One). What is the purpose and how are they educationally-useful? On top of that these were contributed by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:F1 Test Card (Qatar).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Chinese Taipei).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Philippines).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Indonesia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Germany).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Thailand).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Morocco).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Australia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (India).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Vietnam).png
- File:F1 Test Card (South Africa).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Singapore).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Korea).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Malaysia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Saudi Arabia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (UAE).png
- File:F1 Test Card (China).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Switzerland).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Sweden).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Turkey).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Portugal).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Spain).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Russia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Monaco, San Marino and Luxembourg).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Hungary).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Italy).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Netherlands).png
- File:F1 Test Card (UK).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Azerbaijan).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Austria).png
- File:F1 Test Card (France).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Belgium).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Argentina).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Brazil).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Canada).png
- File:F1 Test Card (USA).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Mexico).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 6
[edit]Copyrighted logos. Not simple enough to not pass COM:TOO. Also, the IBC logo has a similar equivalent (in different hue) at enwiki under fair use: en:File:IBC-13 2011 logo.png.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 7
[edit]Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Emperor1991z#Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 4: unused "station coverage" maps by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:MBC Map (Radio Network).png
- File:Radyo5 Map (Radio Network).png
- File:ABS-CBN Map (Radio Network).png
- File:GMA Map (Radio Network).png
- File:PH Commercial (Radio Network).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 8
[edit]Unused maps that show historical borders or future borders of Philippine administrative divisions (but all of these maps are contributions by a now-blocked sockpuppet who had a history of vandalizing existing maps). Maps showing future borders may also violate en:WP:CRYSTAL.
- File:Ph Bangsamoro Autonomous Region 2022.png
- File:Ph Bangsasug.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-2021-12-06.svg
- File:PH cordillera autonomus region.png
- File:Ph cordillera historical.png
- File:PH samar.png
- File:Ph eastern visayas historical.png
- File:Ph central visayas historical.png
- File:Ph western visayas historical.png
- File:Ph negros island region.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1935-1945.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1945-1950.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1952.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1956.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1960.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1965.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 2007.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1998.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 2015.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1987.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1981.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1992.png
- File:PH Map (Mayo 9, 2022).png
- File:PH Map (May 9, 2022).png
- File:Old Analog (Philippine Map).png
- File:Region VI (Historical).png
- File:Region IV (Southern Tagalog).png
- File:Region IV-B (Mimaro).png
- File:Region III (Historical).png
- File:Region I (Historical).png
- File:Region II (Historical).png
- File:Region IX (Western Mindanao).png
- File:Region IX (Historical).png
- File:Region XII (Historical 1).png
- File:Region XII (Central Mindanao).png
- File:Region XII (Historical 2).png
- File:Region XI (Historical 2).png
- File:Region XI (Historical 1).png
- File:Region XI (Southern Mindanao).png
- File:ARMM (Historical).png
- File:Region X (Historical 1).png
- File:Region X (Historical 2).png
- File:Region XII (Soccsksargen Historical).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- "Police maps" by Emperoro1991z
These two files are unused "police maps" which I doubt are usable either on -wiki or off-wiki.
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 9
[edit]Unused regional maps contributed by a notorious sockpuppet who regularly vandalizes existing Philippine maps and contributing out of scope and sometimes copyvio files. There are newer versions in each of these files, but almost all are contributed by Emperor1991z himself. For others, their socks.
- File:NCR (National Capital Region).png
- File:CAR (Cordillera Administrative Region).png
- File:Region II (Cagayan Valley).png
- File:Region I (Ilocos).png
- File:Region III (Central Luzon).png
- File:Region IV-A (Calabarzon).png
- File:Mimaropa (Southwestern Tagalog).png
- File:Region V (Bicol).png
- File:Region VII (Central Visayas).png
- File:Region VIII (Eastern Visayas).png
- File:Region VI (Western Visayas).png
- File:Region XI (Davao).png
- File:Region IX (Zamboanga Peninsula).png
- File:Region XII (Soccsksargen).png
- File:Region X (Northern Mindanao).png
- File:BARMM (Bangsamoro).png
- File:Region XIII (Caraga).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 10
[edit]Here are some of the last-remaining maps uploaded of Emperor1991z, a now-blocked sockpuppet. All are unused maps with little to no evidence of educational and real-life utility (perhaps other than the contributor's own enjoyment). Some of the files have newer versions contributed by one of their sockpuppets.
- File:Region VI (Panay).png
- File:NIR (Negros Island Region).png
- File:Region VII (Cebu).png
- File:ARMM (Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao).png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-noborders Digital Version.png
- File:New Digital (Philippine Map).png
- File:PH Administrative Map Blank 3.png
- File:Largest Regions (23) in the Philippines (official).png
- File:JP Administrative map blank.png
- File:23 Regional Flag maps of the Philippines.png
- File:CAR-1 (Cordillera Administrative Region).png
- File:CAR-2 (Cordillera Autonomus Region).png
- File:Region VIII (Leyte).png
- File:SAR (Samar Administrative Region).png
- File:BARMM-1 (Bangsamoro Autonomous Region).png
- File:BARMM-2 (Bangsasug Autonomous Region).png
- File:Map of the Philippines (17 Regions).svg
- File:Philippines (Regions and Provinces).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_the_Philippines_(official).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Info an anonymous IP (likely from the sockpuppet) removed the deletion notice tags on these files in question. I only reverted some, but cannot revert the others (as I suspect the sockpuppet may return and remove the boilerplate notice tags again, which can be time-consuming). Their removals (like this) won't affect this deletion request, however. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&diff=prev&oldid=610078775&diffmode=source){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Goshlion
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Considering the other files that this user has uploaded of public figures were deleted per COM:CV, I couldn't in good faith trust that any of these files are the uploader's own work. —Oscitare (talk | contribs) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Paul Jouve
[edit]Paul Jouve died in 1973, copyright violation.
- File:Collection des Cent N° 34 (Jouve).jpg
- File:Fauverie - Jardin des Plantes de Paris.jpg
- File:Lion de l'Atlas terrassant un mouflon. 1937.jpg
- File:Panthère noire combattant un python, 1932.jpg
- File:Paravent poissons Poissons des Bermudes. 1957.jpg
- File:Paul Jouve Le jugement de Pâris.png
- File:Paul JOUVE Panthère marchant. 1921.jpg
- File:Paul JOUVE Touareg assis.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Chassipress (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Putting unknown name so delete Jkjeevan16 (talk) 18:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Accidental creation of gallery talk page. --Achim (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unidentified painting, likely not in public domain Mbrickn (talk) 08:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 22:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal photograph. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional flags, no hits on Google Image Search -> no education value and therefore out of scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Silver Fern Sunburn.png.
- File:Feel the Fern.png
- File:Sweet Sixteen.png
- File:Federation Jack.png
- File:Fairer Dinkum.png
- File:Alpha Uniform.png
- File:Red White and Roos.png
- File:Golden Roo Haroo.png
- File:Starstruck.png
- File:The Crux of the Matter.png
- File:Triple Cross.png
- File:Fernlandia.png
- File:Flat White.png
- File:ExtravagaNZa.png
- File:Dolphin's Delight.png
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Purely fictional flags, no encyclopedic use.--A09090091 (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:After Brian Cham variant 2.png
- File:After Brian Cham variant 1.png
- File:After Brian Cham.png
- File:Ozynimbius variant 1C.jpg
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 17.png
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 16.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 19A.png
- File:First to the Light variant 11A.png
- File:First to the Light variant 11B.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 3.png
- File:2k First to the Light variant 11.png
- File:After Kyle Lockwood.jpg
- File:Aesthetic Boundaries variant 2E.png
- File:Aesthetic Boundaries variant 15C.png
- File:Aesthetic Boundaries variant 1A.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 23.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 21.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 15.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 10.png
- File:Easy Peasy variant 6.png
- File:Easy Peasy variant 3.png
- File:Aussie Heritage variant 3.png
- File:Abiding Freedom variant 18.png
- File:Abiding Freedom variant 17.png
- File:Abiding Freedom variant 3.png
- File:Wattle It Be variant 14A.png
- File:Vision Statement variant 9.png
- File:Vision Statement variant 7.png
- File:Vision Statement variant 4.png
- File:The UnCommonwealth variant 10A.png
- File:The Rising One variant 7.png
- File:Starstruck variant 6.png
- File:Lest We Forget variant 3.png
- File:Easy Peasy variant 9.png
- File:Flanked by Roos variant 5.png
- File:Flanked by Roos variant 4A.png
- File:The Rising One variant 14.jpg
- File:Sunset Beachcomber variant 11.jpg
- File:Sunset Beachcomber variant 10.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 81.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 79.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 78.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 71.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 70.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 67.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 64.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 26.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 9.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 8.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 5.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 4.jpg
- File:Ozynimbius variant 1D.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 3.jpg
- File:Opal Empire variant 5.jpg
- File:Opal Empire variant 1.jpg
- File:Good As variant 2C.jpg
- File:Good As variant 2.jpg
- File:First to the Light variant 10.jpg
- File:First to the Light variant 9.jpg
- File:Coast to Coast variant 2.jpg
- File:Coast to Coast variant 1.jpg
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 13.jpg
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 11.jpg
- File:Allegory and Glory variant 5.jpg
- File:Advancing Always.jpg
- File:Advancing Always variant 1.jpg
- File:Abracadabra variant 20.jpg
- File:Wattle It Be variant 15A.jpg
- File:Vision Statement variant 1.jpg
- File:Abracadabra variant 14.jpg
Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: a ton of self-authored flag proposals for various countries (mostly Australia and New Zealand). All unused and unlikely to be used.
- File:After Whitney Smith.png
- File:The Antipodes variant 14.png
- File:The Antipodes variant 13.png
- File:The Antipodes variant 11.png
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 25.png
- File:Opal Empire variant 12.png
- File:Red White and Roos variant 10.png
- File:Opal Empire variant 11A.png
- File:Opal Empire variant 11.png
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 23.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 26.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 28.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 27.png
- File:After Brian Cham variant 2.png
- File:After Brian Cham variant 1.png
- File:After Brian Cham.png
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 17.png
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 16.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 19A.png
- File:First to the Light variant 11A.png
- File:First to the Light variant 11B.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 3.png
- File:2k First to the Light variant 11.png
- File:After Kyle Lockwood.jpg
- File:Aesthetic Boundaries variant 15C.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 20A.png
- File:Advancing Always variant 2A.png
- File:Advancing Always variant 1A.png
- File:Aesthetic Boundaries variant 2E.png
- File:Aesthetic Boundaries variant 1A.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 23.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 21.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 15.png
- File:Abracadabra variant 10.png
- File:Easy Peasy variant 6.png
- File:Easy Peasy variant 3.png
- File:Aussie Heritage variant 3.png
- File:Abiding Freedom variant 18.png
- File:Abiding Freedom variant 17.png
- File:Abiding Freedom variant 3.png
- File:Wattle It Be variant 14A.png
- File:Vision Statement variant 9.png
- File:Vision Statement variant 7.png
- File:Vision Statement variant 4.png
- File:The UnCommonwealth variant 10A.png
- File:The Rising One variant 7.png
- File:Starstruck variant 6.png
- File:Lest We Forget variant 3.png
- File:Easy Peasy variant 9.png
- File:Flanked by Roos variant 4A.png
- File:Flanked by Roos variant 5.png
- File:The Rising One variant 14.jpg
- File:Sunset Beachcomber variant 11.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 81.jpg
- File:Sunset Beachcomber variant 10.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 78.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 79.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 64.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 71.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 70.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 67.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 26.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 9.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 8.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 5.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 4.jpg
- File:Ozynimbius variant 1D.jpg
- File:RSA flag design 3.jpg
- File:Ozynimbius variant 1C.jpg
- File:Opal Empire variant 5.jpg
- File:Opal Empire variant 1.jpg
- File:Good As variant 2C.jpg
- File:Good As variant 2.jpg
- File:First to the Light variant 10.jpg
- File:Coast to Coast variant 2.jpg
- File:First to the Light variant 9.jpg
- File:Coast to Coast variant 1.jpg
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 13.jpg
- File:Alsophila Empire variant 11.jpg
- File:Allegory and Glory variant 5.jpg
- File:Advancing Always.jpg
- File:Advancing Always variant 1.jpg
- File:Abracadabra variant 20.jpg
- File:Abracadabra variant 14.jpg
- File:Vision Statement variant 1.jpg
- File:Wattle It Be variant 15A.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: as previously, these appear to be original proposals by the uploader, not designs which are under consideration by either nation.
- File:'The Rising One variant 16', a speculative Australian national flag design.pdf
- File:'Advancing Always variant 5', a speculative New Zealand national flag design.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 22:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo of a computer screen (mouse in the top right), unsourced deriviative work. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot: not own original work, speedied. --Ankry (talk) 22:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
https://pixabay.com/photos/roman-ruin-algeria-timgad-colosseum-5972321/ Reda Kerbouche (talk) 14:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 17:33, 23 October 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://pixabay.com/photos/roman-ruin-algeria-timgad-colosseum-5972321/ by abdelatif025 --Krdbot 01:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not useful redirection Jean Ernest Pierre (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:13, 23 October 2021 UTC: not useful redirection --Krdbot 01:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Would like to upload a copy without watermark. Angelina Suzuki (talk) 08:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Would like to upload a copy without watermark. Angelina Suzuki (talk) 06:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 07:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by CodySturgis (talk · contribs)
[edit]All uploads by this user seem to be out of scope COM:NUDEs.
- File:Cody Sturgis (the Transformation).jpg
- File:Cody sturgisv2.jpg
- File:Cody sturg.jpg
- File:Cody st.jpg
- File:Cody sturgisss.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis ss.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis sss.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis zz.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis ssss.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 1.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 2.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 3.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 5.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 4.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 6.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 7.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 8.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 9.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 10.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 11.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 12.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis13.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 14.jpg
- File:Cody sturgisb15.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 16.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 17.jpg
- File:Cody sturgisb18.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 19.jpg
- File:Cody sturgis 21.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—Oscitare (talk | contribs) 14:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:ALBUM A09090091 (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete, non-free album cover.[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 20:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:ALBUM A09090091 (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete non-free album cover.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 20:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:ALBUM A09090091 (talk) 20:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, non-free album cover.[3] Verbcatcher (talk) 20:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this file, but after researching the licensing, it’s more appropriate to upload it directly to the English Wikipedia, which I have since done. StevenBjerke97 talk 23:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, and the G7 tag applies (uploaded only yesterday). No big deal, @StevenBjerke97—I don’t think—but FYI once a DR is started here it generally takes precedence over other processes. I guess you actually meant to request SD in the first place; otherwise I would have reverted your retagging.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Yes, my mistake, I forgot to remove my earlier request, being the uploader, I reckon the speedy deletion was the best option. ---StevenBjerke97 talk 01:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
I’ve uploaded the same file on the English Wikipedia, so the one here is obsolete now. -StevenBjerke97 talk 01:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Stefan2 (talk) 19:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- This file has been overwritten and both of the files in the history have problems.
- The first revision, uploaded by User:Mrlukeplease, has the statement I made this file from a public-doamin backgrouynd image and a foreground photo used with permission of its subject. Since it doesn't say where the "backgrouynd" image comes from, there is no way to verify that the image is in the "public-doamin". The foreground photo needs permission from the copyright holder which is normally the photographer, not the subject. "With permission" is also ambiguous as it the permission terms are unspecified. The copyright tag was copied from English Wikipedia without changing to the local Commons tag. On Wikipedia, the copyright tag used states that the work was released to the public domain by the copyright holder, but without revealing who the copyright holder is.
- The second revision, uploaded by User:Thekingofbankside, has the upload summary Jonathan Atter. It is unclear what the uploader meant, but it could be the name of the photographer. It is unclear if Jonathan Atter is the uploader or if it is someone else. The uploader didn't provide a copyright tag, so this file is unlicensed. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete The background image of the first version is used in a blog to illustrate the Watts riots of 1965,[4] if we had more information then {{PD-US-no notice}} might be valid. The second version is unrelated to the first, and no licence has been assigned by its uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Many of the structures in these two images are shown as cations - they have a positive charge, but are missing a negative charge to balance it. All the structures should be have a neutral charge overall. I have created File:Furan resonance.svg and File:Furan resonance with arrows.svg to replace them. Innerstream (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Thanks for uploading corrected images! DMacks (talk) 17:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete both files per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 11:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Unnecessary and redundant near-duplicate of both File:0751jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 01.jpg and File:0751jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 11.jpg. Additional contributions by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also the following
- File:0751jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 05.jpg
- File:0751jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 08.jpg
- File:0751jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 16.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to File:0751jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 17.jpg. Very very very same spot! Another contribution by Judgefloro (talk · contribs), now-blocked for out of scope and derivative works issues. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also the following
- File:0751jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 09.jpg
- File:0777jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 01.jpg
- File:0777jfManggahan Floodway Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 04.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 05.jpg
[edit]
Redundant to File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 06.jpg. COM:WEBHOSTing by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 04.jpg
[edit]
- Also
Too dark and the object is just a silhouette, redundant to File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 03.jpg. One more COM:WEBHOSTing by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 09.jpg
[edit]
- Also
Redundant to File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 08.jpg. Another Judgefloro (talk · contribs) COM:WEBHOSTing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sunsets in Pasig
[edit]Unusable sunsets. Blocked by trees. More ing files by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). All are currently not in use.
- File:01021jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 25.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 01.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 02.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 06.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 07.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 08.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 09.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 10.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 11.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 16.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 17.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 18.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 19.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 20.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 21.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 22.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 23.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 24.jpg
- File:01046jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 25.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.athletic-club.eus/en/players/yuri-berchiche-izeta (gallery) Crowsus (talk) 15:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Atomicdragon136 (talk) 19:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 14:16, 15 November 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 20:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Website copyright Rameshe999 (talk) 10:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Image is a derivative work of a logo that is too complicated that inmediately passes COM:TOO (not simple logo). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Not a contributor to wikimedia project(s). Only edits are uploading files of themselves and creating a userpage describing who they are.
- File:Pronabju 5.jpg
- File:Pronabju 4.jpg
- File:Pronabju 3.jpg
- File:Pronabju 2.jpg
- File:Pronabju.jpg
- File:Pronab.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: the portrait is in use in vi.wiki, four vietnamese girls might be illustrative. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
File:2014 - Little Mix "Salute" (Sheffield Motorpoint Arena) Little Mix (14330062292) Leigh-Anne.jpg
[edit]_Little_Mix_(14330062292)_Leigh-Anne.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Little_Mix_(14330062292)_Leigh-Anne.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unusable FMSky (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As uploader of the source image of this crop. This crop was made from a live feed that in the original is De Minimis, but not here as it is the main and sole theme. Also image is heavily distorted Tm (talk) 17:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_Little_Mix_(14330062292).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; unused; unidentified since 2017. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; unused; unidentified since 2014. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; unused; unidentified since 2013. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Complex logo. Fails COM:TOO. C messier (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This video is not licensed under CC BY 3.0; the license noted at the bottom of the video description is for the music "Who Likes to Party" by Kevin MacLeod as it says on the line above it. Ved havet (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete My bad, I did not notice the music part of the description. Looks like User:Ved havet is correct, thanks. - Premeditated (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, uploader concurs. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Girls of the Night (1953 film). Universal Pictures publicity photo. Joyce Holden as Georgia Codray.jpg
[edit]._Universal_Pictures_publicity_photo._Joyce_Holden_as_Georgia_Codray.jpg){kind=link}
._Universal_Pictures_publicity_photo._Joyce_Holden_as_Georgia_Codray.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright 1952 Universal Pictures Company. The copyright notice was cropped off. See https://www.photo-memory.eu/galerie/joyce-holden-icone-beatnik-girls-in-the-night/. Nosferattus (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: This DR might be due to a discussion of {{PD-US-no notice}} at COM:VPC#PD-US-no notice usage about similar files uploaded by the same uploader under the same license. The source provided for the photo does show it without a copyright notice, but it does seem as if it was cropped out by whomever uploaded the photo to that website. The coloring of the two photos also seems a bit different with the one uploaded to Commons looking more black-and-white than the other; that, however, could just be me. Anyway, the "PD-US-no notice" license appears to be a mistake, but it still might be possible to keep the file if it can be shown to be {{PD-US-not renewed}}. If there's a way to tell whether the copyright on the photo wasn't renewed, then it would seem to be PD. It would be PD for a different reason perhaps, but it would still be PD. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Going to say
Keep as {{PD-US-not renewed}}. I did a further search, and the only 1952 Universal Pictures renewals were ones of films. I could not find anything under "Girls in the Night" (note that the film is "in", not "of") or "Joyce Holden", either, other than the film itself. There are some 1980s teaching books with a Joyce Holden as co-author, unsure if that is the same person or not. But also not relevant here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC) - Keep as not renewed; compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gloria DeHaven Pin-up for Universal, 1954.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gloria Universal Pictures photo, 1954.jpg. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 23:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per above discussion. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why? It's not your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|vorrei eliminare la foto che ho caricato con il mio vecchio account}} Santopennestri4 (talk) 07:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021102110009992 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
I would like to remove the B/W version of the image. I just uploaded the color version of the same image and hit upload new version of photo to replace the B/W image. I thought by doing so the color photo would replace the B/W photo, but it just added it. So now there are duplicate versions of the same photo.[ Hollywood25 (talk) 03:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[User:Hollywood25|Hollywood25]] (talk) 00:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Keep both colour & black & white version, and upload the colour version separately. Good to have both. Vysotsky (talk) 00:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of redundant b/w version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Issue resolved. Deletion nomination can be removed from page.
Maybe copyvio, very small any without EXIF data. Out of scope Reda Kerbouche (talk) 00:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, I used reverse image search to find similar photos with no mention of CC license. User has previously made many copyright violations before, such as uploading a copyrighted image of Peter Jakab that I have reported before. Cattojazz (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Unclear source and licence. 100+ matches via TinEye GeorgHH • talk 16:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs a proper source. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 16:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Low quality and doesn't seem to have a use 141.156.19.90 17:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; we have enough similar vids. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of c:File:Danela Arsovska 11.jpg Pta345MK (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
_Island,_Japan_-_July_6th,_2020.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Island,_Japan_-_July_6th,_2020.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not own work 61.120.241.72 18:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copernicus appears to be © ESA 2014-2021. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Private image collection, out of scope.
- File:Kemtelly.jpg
- File:Kemtelly means to be inexorable.jpg
- File:Kemtelly represents for Isla clan.jpg
- File:The word Kemtelly means to be inexorable.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 18:26, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Yesterday, I contacted Lauren Lean of the George Eastman Museum regarding the copyright status of this particular photograph as I hoped to use it in the F. Scott Fitzgerald Featured Article for Wikipedia. Lean, in turn, contacted the copyright holder, The Universal Order. Their representative, Julie Parker, replied to my inquiry and stated that this particular photograph is under copyright and requires a fee to use. As such, I am nominating this image for deletion. -- Flask (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- UPDATE: Gertrude Stein's memoir, The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas (1933), indicates that Alvin Langdon Coburn's 1912 photographs of herself had not been published as of 1933. See pages 171-172 of the first edition:
As such, if this photograph was published prior to 1933, Stein herself was not aware of its publication. -- Flask (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)"It was about nineteen twelve that Alvin Langdon Coburn turned up in Paris. He was a queer American who brought with him a queer English woman, his adopted mother. Alvin Langdon Coburn had just finished a series of photographs that he had done for Henry James. He had published a book of photographs of prominent men and he wished now to do a companion volume of prominent women. I imagine it was Roger Fry who had told him about Gertrude Stein. At any rate he was the first photographer to come and photograph her as a celebrity and she was nicely gratified. He did make some very good photographs of her and gave them to her and then he disappeared and though Gertrude Stein has often asked about him nobody seems ever to have heard of him since."
- This quote from the memoir only indicates that they never heard from Coburn again. It does not necessarily mean they weren't published. —howcheng {chat} 08:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Why should be {{PD-US}} invalid? Was the image not first published in the United States before 1926? The behavior of Julie Parker from The Universal Order seems to be copyfraud. --Ras67 (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: It is possible it is copyfraud. However, after three days of searching, I cannot find a source with this image published before 1926. I have leafed through three biographies of Gertrude Stein, a dozen volumes of Camera Work, Camera Notes, Metropolitan Magazine, etc. In contrast, Coburn's other photographs are easy to locate in terms of publication. I wish I could find a pre-1926 publication source because it is a nice photo of Stein. -- Flask (talk) 01:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Stein was living in France at the time, so presumably French rather than US copyright relevant. If any US publication before 1926 were found, that might change the status, but Flask notes that none such has not been yet been found despite diligent search. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. Usually when a discernable copy has been distributed the copyright clock starts ticking, but this image may have remained with the photographer, and remained unpublished for copyright purposes. --RAN (talk) 03:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment Note that on the Flickr source page, it still says "No known copyright restrictions". —howcheng {chat} 07:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)- Delete I would generally defer to Eastman House label of "No known copyright restrictions", but unfortunately User:Flask's research seems to indicate they are wrong in this case. It is tagged as having been published in the US before 1926, but as detailed above that seems false. Photo was created in France. The en:W Alvin Langdon Coburn article gives the photographer a death date of 1966. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and Flask's research. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Scans/photos of printed works; incorrect date information considering the death date at w:Draft:Maria Helena Duarte, making authorship information dubious.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A drawing by someone. IMHO, out of scope, as it isn't realistically useful for an educational purpose. C messier (talk) 19:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Asymmetric Catalytic Ketimine Mannich Reactions and Related Transformations (catalysts-11-00712).pdf - WPS Office 2021 10 23 15 22 02.png
[edit].pdf_-_WPS_Office_2021_10_23_15_22_02.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.pdf_-_WPS_Office_2021_10_23_15_22_02.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is a screenshot of a PDF viewer software. The images directly from the source should be uploaded instead. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 19:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, see file description Atomicdragon136 (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted according to the text in image itself. Also zero encyclopedic value, uploaded by amateur rapper trying to market himself at Wikipedia. Tournesol (talk) 19:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
per COM:PS and COM:WEBHOST A09090091 (talk) 20:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
per COM:PS and COM:WEBHOST A09090091 (talk) 20:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by QuantumXPro (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, images can be found online via Google Images; see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by QuantumXPro.
--PhiH (talk) 20:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dannypraise9519 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal free web host. Out of scope.
- File:Musiq rell pizz.jpg
- File:Musiq rell and detrick haddon.jpg
- File:Melody Corvaley Nichelle Carr.jpg
- File:Terrell Raheem Carr Jr.jpg
- File:Musiq rell siblins .jpg
GeorgHH • talk 21:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
This was an accidental reupload, and contains information that seems to be incorrect. Aenet (talk) 21:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion and INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
The picture appears here [5] and says: "Performing at the Hammersmith Apollo, London, in 2008. Photograph: Simone Joyner/Getty Images". Tbhotch™ 21:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Here it is at Getty [6]
- I wouldn't trust Getty with claims about copyright, but this is clearly part of a set by Simone Joyner [7] Unless the uploader here can show some sort of paper trail to explain that, it has to go. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation : capture d'écran Youtube Lagribouille (talk) 22:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks (see https://st-augustin-coburg.de/kirchen/st-augustin-coburg/kirchenfue/kircheninnenraum/fenster etc.); no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
no evidence that uploader is copyright holder (Lisa Quintero Photography, per metadata) SecretName101 (talk) 23:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Resized duplicate of "File:Yugas.png". File usage already moved. Jroberson108 (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- File description confirms duplication: "from Yugas.png by Nataraja" (French: "de Yugas.png par Nataraja"). Jroberson108 (talk) 11:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jon Ander Landa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
The content of this file has been transferred to File:Flag of Georgia.svg as part of a completed "protected edit request". This file is no longer required and may be deleted. MapGrid (talk) 03:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
All other uploads by this user are copyvios. Wcam (talk) 03:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Ukraine. Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the claimed license is correct - given the age and lack of source link, it's unlikely.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Ukraine. Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Source: https://www.taringa.net/+info/si-vas-a-salir-de-argentina-mira-por-donde_12paxh Frodar (talk) 04:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation João Justiceiro (talk) 04:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image was published in 1931, perhaps entered pd in the source country, but not is US due to COM:URAA 182.239.88.56 05:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low-quality pictures of stained-glass windows
[edit]- File:Parnas (metro) vitrage-2.JPG
- File:Parnas (metro) vitrage.JPG
- File:Novocherkasskaya metrostation - Stained-glass window (left).JPG
- File:Novocherkasskaya metrostation - Stained-glass window.JPG
_vitrage-2.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_vitrage.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Very low quality pictures of modern stained-glass windows at Saint Petersburg metrostations. No educational value and also no FoP in Russia for such artworks. --Красный wanna talk? 05:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright suspect, Inadvertently imported Arjunaraoc (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted from here https://www.greatblackspeakers.com/author/sampsondavis/ Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:26, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted packaging Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, Francis Bernard died in 1979. https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5491237 Tekstman (talk) 07:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Family archive photo, not own work of 2020. Out of scope. Drakosh (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snedronningen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata.
- File:Гидролизный цех летом 2010 года.jpg
- File:Панорама гидролизного цеха летом 2008 года.jpg
- File:Цех № 2. Силосное хозяйство летом 2008.jpg
- File:Цех грануляции БВК, лето 2008 года.jpg
- File:Цеха КБХЗ летом 2008 года.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Contains watermark. Angelina Suzuki (talk) 08:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Slight doubt about auhorship by uploader, as the same image in identical resolution is shown a publication from 2009[8], though the deep link[9] of the image does not contain a date. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
![[9]](https://activerain.com/image_store/uploads/6/1/2/0/0/ar125870414900216.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, non-free on its home country. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wilhelm_Burgdorf.jpg#Licensing for information DerpGunKV2 (talk) 09:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Also
Doubt if this file is usable or most likely out of COM:SCOPE. The church announcement tarpaulin is already fading, thus there is little possibility of this being COM:EDUSE. Contribution by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE, not used in any other project NoonIcarus (talk) 11:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- agreed, educational use seems far fetched --Isderion (talk) 22:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Photo attributed to Robert McNaught but published in flickr by someone else with a cc-by-sa license - possibly license laundering. C messier (talk) 11:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownership claim: [10] Gyrostat (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownership claim: [11] Gyrostat (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
As mentioned in the caution, the photo is work of Miloslav Druckmüller that was reposted in flickr from another person. Possibly license laundering. C messier (talk) 11:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
image from ~1943 so obviously not own qork Denniss (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in the united states for frescos or outside works of art in general. Sorry. Jebulon (talk) 12:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Jebulon: This does not strike me as above the threshold of originality. Letters arranged in a straightforward way within three larger letters. The writing itself likewise is not copyrightable as just a list of people's names. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- maybe you are right, no problem for me. As for me, it is obviously a painted work of art, on a wall, in a public place. Please let the discussion go. Again, I could survive if this very good photograph is kept in Commons. I think a debate is necessary, and will make this image stronger, if kept.--Jebulon (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Definitely copyright ineligible, since it consists of just letters and names. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per Daniel Case above. Yann (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping per the keeps - thank you everyone!. --Missvain (talk) 19:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small size, lacks EXIF, the photo is available all over the internet before 2019. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a television screenshot Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
The photo was published in newspaper and is one of the few images of the secretive weapon, however it can be deleted due to the copyright reasons. Blueginger2 (talk) 13:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
It doesn't need to be deleted for copyright reasons -- it is about as crystal-clear an example of legitimate fair use as you are ever likely to see. However, there are quite a few problems on the file page that need to be cleared up. The original uploader described it as "own work", and gave a license type of CCA-by-SA 4. That doesn't seem likely to be true. It's not impossible that AVBurilichev may have been an independent videographer who owns this footage and provided it to Vesti under a non-exclusive contract; but then he/she should then have provided a screencap from the original video instead of a screen cap from the broadcast version. So, unless AVBurilichev provides evidence of copyright ownership, the attribution and license tags need to be changed, and other changes as required to conform to Wikipedia:WP:Non-free_content. There are other concerns, though. Both the Commons file description, and the caption in WP, suggest that the grey tube near the stern is the Poseidon weapon on, or being deployed from, RV Akademik Aleksandrov. How do we know that? Turns out that was internet speculation about the nature of this video, not official or informed information. There is apparently good reason to believe that RV Akademik Aleksandrov has been involved in testing Poseidon; however, those tests includes launch of inert, surrogate test articles. And the object in this picture -- well, although it is a long grey tube, in other detail it doesn't completely resemble the pictures publicly released by the Russian government. And if it is a top secret weapon test, what is it doing out in the open in a place with access to the public, or at least, the press? The decription page should probably be changed from just saying "Poseidon drone" to giving fuller information about the provenance, and the speculation that the grey tube might be a Poseidon. -- 122.200.24.22 05:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: This is not Wikipedia, no fair use on Commons. --Achim55 (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Obviously out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, uploaded the wrong file via the upload wizard (no confirmation now - single click). This photo had been published by press (do not remember which one). Pls remove. Zezen (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
_deutscher_Pelzanbieter_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_deutscher_Pelzanbieter_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests 188.255.49.195 13:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_deutscher_Pelzanbieter_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
_deutscher_Pelzanbieter_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Priyadarshithakur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Covers of books apparently authored by the uploader, and an image where uploader is the subject. OTRS verification needed. Second book cover has a photograph which may have a separate copyright. Photographer of the portrait photo unknown.
- File:Sigiriya Puraan Cover.jpg
- File:Rani Ruupmati ki Aatmakatha Cover.jpg
- File:Priyadarshi Sharma.jpg
MKFI (talk) 13:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Photograph by the Studio Harcourt, copyright violation. Chassipress (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. There is a clear jurisprudence on photos by Studio Harcourt: they are considered as collective works. Therefore the photo would be PD in 2021 if and only if it would have been taken before 1950. — Racconish 💬 15:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021102510005827 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 02:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: VTRS provided. --Missvain (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This is maybe a Copyright violation. Because this new user uploaded 4 photos and 3 of them are copyvio. The name is not correct, out of scope Reda Kerbouche (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Diplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not "own work" but taken from a constructors page. 2001:A61:1021:3701:5D4D:12DB:8BF1:DE54 15:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Seems this is a promo photo for a song, also here:https://soundcloud.com/blawplaya/rack-x-saske-nasa-slowed-reverb C messier (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot from Googlemap satellite image Bogomolov.PL (talk) 16:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
no educational value Veliensis (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
educational value? Veliensis (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Risk of copyright violation. Derivative work of a photograph taken in the UK in 1922, which is too recent to assume public domain.Black-and-white original at Museum Wales, on whose website it appears without a free licence.[12] Verbcatcher (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Per Commons:FOP UK Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Update, I have now noticed the Non-free graffiti tag which I hadn’t noticed before. I nominated this a while ago, though now I don’t think it should be deleted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
author request, this flag wasn't used as the attempted political party coalition was dismantled just 4 days after creation Roqz (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
per COM:BOOK A09090091 (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: These requests have been split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro. However, all numeric disambiguations have been retained. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 1
- File:FvfBulacan9999 16.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 14.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 13.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 15.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 11.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 12.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 10.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 07.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 09.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 08.JPG
LGA talkedits 04:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- I was in the midst of the Bustos town fiesta festival when I chanced to discover this almost hidden or by the side Monument; Thanks for the message; in Commons:Derivative works, I ponder that the logo and seal is part of the Cultural heritage, monuments and memorials in Bulacan or in the Philippines emanating from the Tourism aspect for the site is 100 years marker and landmark of the town. No objection to the deletion, though.--Judgefloro (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 2
no FoP in Philippines. Though maybe some can be considered DM
- File:0407jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 03.jpg
- File:0407jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 02.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 13.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 11.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 10.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 08.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 07.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 09.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and good morning; I looked at the photos of the Wikipedia Takes Manila for example this 2012 Image of the Public Market 6 photos taken by this Project in the Category; this market which is now reconstructed, hence, I presume that the photos of the facade and interior are well within the Philippine projects; I just passed by this place to hear mass at the Church near this market; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, Category:Santa Ana Public Market, Manila includes 6 photos of the same facade by the the Wikipedia Takes Manila
sincerely --Judgefloro 19:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC) (talk)
Deleted: most, kept two as DM. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 4
No COM:FOP in the Philippines, artists' permission needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)\
- Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
- With all due respect, I am submitting here the legal ramifications on the matter, to wit:
- Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Rizal Park was granted to herein photographer editor by the Head of the Visitor Centre of Rizal Park, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the said Visitor Office of the Park including the Tourist Map Category:Tourist map of Rizal Park;
- Category:Rizal Park Visitor's Center the head explained to me each and every numbers corresponding to the places of the tourist spots of the park, including the subject Sentinel of Freedom or Lapu-Lapu monument which is now the property of the Government; b) she assisted me in the photography of the Park's Tourism information center and even pointed to the bust of Jose Rizal for me to take photo of;
- All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx Category:Colossal brass statue-monument of Lapu-Lapu (Sentinel of Freedom), Rizal Park Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
- In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark sport; Most respectfully submitted, and very sincerely Judgefloro 02:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: First they are works of the respective sculptors even if commissionned (which remains to be proved). Concerning the Sentinel of Freedom monument it has been founded by the Korea Freedom League so it can hardly be a Pinoy Government work. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment If all of the above files are deleted, deleting admin should consider nuking all of the uploads under COM:FOP Philippines as they are taken by the same person within the same area. 大诺史 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Good morning and thanks for your notes as I respectfully submit my Rejoinder Buildings and sculptures as works of art; However,
- I would like to differ in the application, interpretation of the cited Article Sec. 172 of the IP Code of the Philippines, and other related provisions, for the following reasons: in Statutory construction, the spirit and intent of the Copyright law in its related provisions should be looked into so as not to make absurd the Section; in this case the Rizal Park administration, that is Rizal Parks Develoment Committed through the Head of the Visitors Office, paid all the labors and works of the architect or sculptors, and all the foreman and manual laborers to build in in Agrifinal Circle; the same can be said of all thousands works now owned or transferred to the Government of the Philippines; as in our Government, the Rizal Park Board owns as Corporate entity all the properties of the Park irrespective of who crafted or built the church; in fact a Park cannot be created and the Attractions or Tourist spots thereat cannot be exposed to Public domain if the architect, laborers and lot owner will not transfer title to the Park and Government; this is the difference between the moral rights of the Copyright holder and one who lost all his rights when he is paid his job or works by Board or Committed of the Park; hence, the Visitors Center and Committee has control and jurisdiction over the Park and sculptures; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, for this is a National Cultural Treasure as declared by Law and even evidence by the Historical Markers, and by the Declaration List of National Cultural Treasures in the Philippines Rizal Monument declared a National Cultural Treasure Under Philippine Law, to wit, REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10066 should be read with the Philippine Copyright Law; and all the Tourist spots in the Tourist Map of Rizal Park including the Category:Soul Waves - Filipino-Korean Soldier Monumentincluded in the given Map by the Visitor's Center fall within the Express Exception to FOP, hence the Lost Rights of Sculptors, inter alia, that is all now of the Public Domain, because of being Government Property; here with Express Permission of the Head of the Visitors Center; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, References
- Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) and Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro very sincerely Judgefloro 04:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Sculptor is Filipino Juan Sajid Imao who was paid, and lost all his rights since this work is upon Bilateral Relations of Korea and Philippines; The hard evidence to Donations or Full transfer to Rizal Park, National Government are the 2 Historical Markers Monuments that state so and the name of the Sculptor Juan Sajid Imao is engraved therein; for this matters, I respectfully submit that the same 3 Sculptures including Lapu-lapu monument are of the Public Domain of the Government of the Philippines expressly falling with the Exceptions of the Copyrright Law as I respectfully underscore the Express Assistance and Permission to photo by the Management of Rizal Park Tourist Visitor Center, very sincerely Judgefloro 04:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- References of the Filipino Sculptor and Donation are the marker and marker 2 very sincerely Judgefloro 04:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Agree with the deletion of the rest of the images given rule on FOP and that most, if not all, of these artwork's authors (esp. Jose M. Mendoza, author of Bisig) are still living which means not suitable for PD-Philippines. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep the following images since the artwork is not the main focus of the image but the surrounding Agrifina Circle Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Freedom of panorama unfortunately. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 5
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 17.jpg
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 15.jpg
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 14.jpg
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 12.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and Good Afternoon from hereat Cloudy Bulacan Philippines due to LPA; please allow me to let the researchers consider that Laborers or Paid Workers and not artist, work per piece or per day with minimum daily wages paid by Employers, here, the University Board; Love arts are scattered all over the Philippines; and here in my country, no artist will execute a work in the streets or outside the Schools; I ♥ love Landmark are manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist, hence outside the scope of Copyrights law; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons in this matter; Very very sincerelyJudgefloro 09:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- It isn't up to you to say "manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist", it is the copyright law of the country (Philippines) which follows the law of the U.S.. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Unsure With regards to current standing of the Philippines on FOP, I agree yet the subject of the image is a mass-produced generic work and does not violate the Commons:Threshold_of_originality rule, thus the subject having no copyright. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
{{Pd-ineligible}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markoolio97 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear TOO in the Philippines. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 6
No FOP in Philippines for sculptures
- File:624The White House Events Place 21.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 20.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 19.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 17.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 18.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 16.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 14.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 13.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 12.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 11.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 09.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 08.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This might apply for PD-Philippines tag given that the subject of the images are examples of old-style of architecture (around early 1900 to late 1960) Markoolio97 (talk) 02:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC) {{PD-Philippines}}
- Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Looks to be rather generic mass-produced garden fountain and decoration figures. Many of the photos don't even show the "sculptures". How old is the building? If old enough to not be a FOP concern, I don't think a fresh coat of paint changes the status. (I'd lean keep but I'm not familiar with the history of the building nor details of Philippines copyright.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Here are a few examples of similar architecture reference 1, reference 2. I have been looking on the subject and references.
and there are some hints that point to the subject being a recently-built structure that was designed to look similar to the old style of houses.This image shows a set of glass doors in the upper level of the house which continues through the windowed portion of the house, an uncanny and not period-correct design. The stone design on the left also looks artificial and attached only and not period-correct. Apart from these, there are not enough information available to correctly date the structure. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)- I have done a quick look in Google Earth and the structure is visible as of the earliest satellite image, April 25, 2004. It also shows that the place had been renovated sometime between March and October 2015 which might explain the uncanny and out-of-period design of the place. I'm going for keep (see above). Markoolio97 (talk) 06:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: kept most, deleted a few where the sculpture or fountain were a clear focus. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 15
COM:Derivative work of a model of the city. There is no freedom of panorama for 3D model works in the Philippines, and also as per User:Elcobbola/Models.
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 42.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 41.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 40.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 39.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 38.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 37.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 17
COM:Derivative works: of a map and various photographs. There is no freedom of panorama for such works. The map is undated but I suspect the map dates to 90s or 2000s considering the print and age of map degradation. For others, the photos look as if they are recent and the photographers must be still alive. COM:VRT correspondence of permissions from the heirs of the map's author and photographers of the photos are required.
- Map
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 43.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 44.jpg
- Photographs
- File:5977Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 01.jpg
- File:5977Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 02.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 47.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 48.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 25.jpg - this and the rest below might be dismissed as COM:DM, but by cropping out the photos leaves behind mere useless images of plain walls that are inferior to other files here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 24.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 23.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 22.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 15.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 19
Derivative work violation. Billboards, no COM:FOP Philippines, and missing COM:VRT correspondence of authorization for Judgefloro's use of commercial license from the graphic artists.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 22
[edit]Modern-looking statue. But there is no freedom of panorama here. Google Street View imagery shows this statue is no longer existing in public space. Hence it can be questioned its eligibility for future FOP as proposed (House Bill 799 and House Bill 2672).
- File:05529jfIvatan Halls House Capilla San Martin Bustos Bulacanfvf 19.JPG
- File:05529jfIvatan Halls House Capilla San Martin Bustos Bulacanfvf 20.JPG
- File:05529jfIvatan Halls House Capilla San Martin Bustos Bulacanfvf 23.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Barangay Manggahan Hall, Super Health Center, Pasig City Multi-Purpose Building and Gender and Development Center Complex
[edit]Some sort of artistic work (a 2D design of buildings). No applicable exception (COM:FOP Philippines). Needs permission for commercial license from the designer who made this.
- File:0908jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 05.jpg
- File:0908jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 06.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Фотография является моей собственностью в рамках проекта Википедия, как и остальные загруженные мной. Автор проекта hiddenside.ru отдал мне полное право на использование фотоматериала с целью написания статьи, чему есть письменное подтверждение в переписке (не волнуйтесь). Размер 800х600 является исходным. Какие метаданные требуются?--Никита Дронов (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - I have added a COMMONS:VRTS tag on the photo, assuming good faith on what Никита Дронов has shared. They have one week to provide appropriate permissions from the copyright holder they mentioned or the photo will be deleted due to copyright concerns. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
"Own work" is claimed, but the photo doesn't have metadata yet. Furthermore, it appears too professional to belong to the uploader. George Ho (talk) 10:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - Since the image is in use and the subject of the photo is believed to be the uploader, I have tagged the image with a request for COMMONS:VRTS. If permissions are not provided we will delete. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
All are redundant to better images found at Category:Askal. These are FB snapshot-like images (COM:WEBHOSTing) by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs).
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 01.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 02.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 03.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 04.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 05.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 06.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 07.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 08.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 09.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 10.jpg
- File:0927Close up photographs of Askal puppies of the Philippines 11.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep similar quality to others in the category and valid license. --RAN (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): there is no qiestion on quality and licensing. The only issue here is redundancy (COM:REDUNDANT). These images are also unused as of this writing. The uploader was blocked not because of licensing issues but because of his dumping of thousands of largely personal or FB-like travel files (and a couple of no-FOP or DW problems). His block log proves that. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- We have over 10,000 photos of dogs and puppies, 99.9% are unused. I don't see any difference for these in quality. We don't actually delete them, we just hide them. --RAN (talk) 06:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 12:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
File:The Forbes skull, viewed from the side. George Busk papers, Royal College of Surgeons London hr.jpg
[edit]
This was taken from my paper (linked here) without permission from the Royal College of Surgeons or myself. They do not allow reproduction. 107.13.112.95 15:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Question Who took this photograph, and when? If George Busk or a contemporary took it, it is way old enough to be out of copyright and no amount of "in my paper" or "not permitting reproduction" can change that. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Entendí que la foto no estaba realizada por el autor del artículo, sino por parte de Mr George Busk, quien falleció hace más de 100 años. En todo caso, si me he equivocado, pido perdón y retiraré la foto inmediatamente.
- I'd suposed that the picture was taked by Mr George Busk, who died far than 100 years. If I have had a mistake, I will delete the picture as soon as possible. --Nachosan (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- This link shows the pages, 35-43, of The Papers of George Busk about Gibraltar 1, but I am not sure that the photograf was published. --Nachosan (talk) 20:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Cited article: The Forgotten Fossil: The Wild Homo calpicus of Gibraltar, Paige Madison.
Kept: Created by George Busk (1807-1886), not the authors of the paper. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio? The signature make it not anonymous. Atelier Peffer might be a lead to the individual illustrator. Tekstman (talk) 08:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- On second thought, this is probably Franz Peffer. I will look for more info and will retract if I reach a (high degree of) certainty. Tekstman (talk) 08:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Back again, Franz Peffer worked for Excelsior Reifen before: [13]. I would still like to see an example of his signature resembling the one on the poster concerned. It definitely looks like a P. Tekstman (talk) 08:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. Also, pre-mid 1995 drawings, paintings etc. could not be anonymous works by German law. --Rosenzweig τ 23:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Book is still under copyright, PD will not be at least until 2035 ({{PD-France}}). A09090091 (talk) 20:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Unsure, the text is not literary and it may be too simple to be copyrightable. The logo may be below the threshold of originality in France, see COM:TOO France. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-ineligible}}. --Rosenzweig τ 11:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no evidence that the uploader of file this is extracted from is the copyright holder (Lisa Quintero Photography, per metadata) SecretName101 (talk) 23:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Still copyrighted works of art shown indoors at a temporary exhibition and thereby not covered by Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/Europe#Netherlands<FoP exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Same problem with:
- File:2018 Bonnefantenmuseum, tentoonstelling collectie Defauwes (3).jpg
- File:2018 Bonnefantenmuseum, tentoonstelling collectie Defauwes (1).jpg <- de minimis?
- File:2018 Bonnefantenmuseum, tentoonstelling collectie Defauwes (2).jpg
- File:2020 Bonnefanten, expositie 100e geboortejaar Ger Lataster (2).jpg
- File:2020 Bonnefanten, expositie 100e geboortejaar Ger Lataster (1).jpg
- File:2020 Bonnefanten, expositie 100e geboortejaar Ger Lataster (3).jpg
- File:2020 Bonnefanten, expositie 100e geboortejaar Ger Lataster (4).jpg
- File:2020 Bonnefanten, expositie 100e geboortejaar Ger Lataster (5).jpg
- File:2020 Bonnefanten, expositie 100e geboortejaar Ger Lataster (6).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ger Lataster died in 2012, so the 2020 files with Lataster in their names can be restored in 2083. --Rosenzweig τ 21:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
vermutlich URV, siehe https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:565b1cfb-520e-44d1-91f3-65e3d16c5e39/manual-tecnico-dr-2016-en.pdf Seite 20 Ulfbastel (talk) 11:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
die deutsche version ist hier https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/attachments/109482301/Fibel_FI_de_2018-02_201804091455430471.pdf?download=true, ebenfalls S.20 Beide Dokumente datieren von 2016, also gleiches Jahr wie die Skizze hier. --Ulfbastel (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Dear uploader, if you made this image by yourself please upload the unedited version again with the complete exif data, or ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. --Ellywa (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://navsource.narod.ru/photos/02/207/index.html Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- I deleted the photo from all pages on Wikipedia already due to the copyright violation, it should be deleted. Blueginger2 (talk) 21:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Blueginger2: images remain usable until you explicitly request they be deleted. In the future if you find a copyright violation you can request. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
No proof of license Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- The same photo is used on English Wiki website, however I cannot use it on other language Wikipedias asa it's not part of Wikipedia commons collection, so I had to reupload it. Blueginger2 (talk) 21:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Blueginger2: actually that's by design. Commons has a stricter fair use policy. In the future, if you want to upload a copyrighted work, you can check the policy for your wiki here: m:Fair use.
- However, in this case, we are lucky and the image may qualify as {{Indian navy}}. Ping Indian admins for a second opinion: @CptViraj, @Dharmadhyaksha, @Fitindia, @Sreejithk2000, @Wikitanvir, @Yann. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: @Dharmadhyaksha: @Fitindia: Please tell me your opinion if this image can be used due to copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueginger2 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- The official website is down, so I am not sure about the license. The alternate website https://www.joinindiannavy.gov.in/ does not list the website contents under a free license. However the template {{Indian navy}} says we have OTRS permission, so if a VRT admin can confirm that the license is valid, we can keep the image. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- +1. The official website is working for me and it says All Rights Reserved but we have the special permission so no worries. But I would still like a VRTS volunteer to confirm the permission. -- CptViraj (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- The official website is down, so I am not sure about the license. The alternate website https://www.joinindiannavy.gov.in/ does not list the website contents under a free license. However the template {{Indian navy}} says we have OTRS permission, so if a VRT admin can confirm that the license is valid, we can keep the image. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per CptViraj. --Ellywa (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
As the depicted paintings and sculptures are likely by contemporary artist or at least still in copyright, I wonder how these shots in a New York-gallery could be considered legitimate, i.e. not violating the copyright pf the artists. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Same or similar problem with:
- File:ViewingExhibit-2.tif <- the depicted ensemble of human spectators and two sculptures is probably staged; contrary to the paintings on the wall, the sculptures are hardly de minimis. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:TG-9-12-07.jpg
- File:Terrain-Gallery-show.jpg
- File:Art Education at the Terrain Gallery - M. Rackow.jpg <- this might be o.k., as paintings are hardly recognizable (blurry)
- File:Terrain Gallery Exhibition 2005.jpg
- File:Terrain-Gallery-1959-by-L-Dienes.jpg
- Please don't delete anything yet. I would like to take each image and discuss possibilities. I can get copyright permission for many of these paintings. Is it possible we can blur images of works to make them unrecognizable? LoreMariano (talk)
- Two questions:
- 1) Can you direct me to the copyright regulations regarding works viewed in a gallery?
- 2) Is it permitted to blur the works so that they are not recognizable? Thanks.Trouver (talk) 15:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've replied on my talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 17:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Since october no permission received, which would be higly complicated because the works are of several artists. --Ellywa (talk) 15:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
