Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Copyright violation - page of a newspaper from 1978, not in public domain yet JopkeB (talk) 16:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Newspaper page from 1978 is copyrighted in The Netherlands Elly (talk) 13:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Hoax https://domjp2.pl/eksponat-tygodnia/pamietnik-danuty-puklowny/ Le5zek (talk) 15:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, per linlk. --Masur (talk) 17:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Netcopyvio[1]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 16:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Because it shows the wrong plant, a ubiquitous one, that does not add anything to Hechtgraben, otherwise as Apium nodiflorum would do. Pete (talk) 17:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:29, 18 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Advertisement --Krdbot 20:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not a web album site for individual users Moonian (talk) 06:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sun8908 (talk) 12:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Khmergfn15 (talk) 03:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - page of a newspaper from 1982, not in public domain yet JopkeB (talk) 16:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Minoraxtalk 11:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Newspaper page from 1982 is copyrighted in The Netherlands Elly (talk) 13:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: see above. --Minoraxtalk 11:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Description said "courtesy of Carrie Vicek-Jodelka". There is no proof that Carrie Vicek-Jodelka is an employee from NWS, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep according to NWS photo submission information "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others." Hence the photos are in the public domain and can be used on Commons ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 17:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It seems that bad faith is being assumed here. Any proof that Carrie Vicek-Jodelka isn’t an employee from NWS? That’s not being mentioned here. SelfieCity (talk) 00:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep assume good faith. If you go based on that reasoning, you can't prove that we're real people if we're talking on the "you can't prove that" scale. SHB2000 (talk) 09:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept per Gwennie-nyan above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope; was used solely for a spam post at en.wikinews apparently: see [2] —chaetodipus (talk) 02:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:13, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:"von valentina"
[edit]COM:SCOPE private images
Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Das Bild Novovesky.jpg und Karl Novovesky.jpg kann gelöscht werden,- es wird nicht verwendet. Danke Wellano18143 (talk) 10:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope. Also, used on Cross-wiki self promotion --Alaa :)..! 21:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tepe Jen
[edit]بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 10.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 11.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 12.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 13.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 14.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 15.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 16.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 17.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 18.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 19.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 2.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 20.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 21.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 22.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 23.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 24.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 25.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 26.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 27.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 28.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 29.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 3.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 30.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 31.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 32.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 33.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 34.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 35.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 36.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 37.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 38.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 39.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 4.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 40.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 41.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 42.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 43.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 44.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 45.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 46.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 47.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 48.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 49.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 5.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 50.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 51.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 52.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 53.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 54.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 55.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 56.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 57.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 58.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 59.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 6.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 60.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 61.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 62.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 63.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 64.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 65.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 66.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 67.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 68.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 69.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 7.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 70.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 71.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 72.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 73.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 74.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 75.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 76.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 77.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 78.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 79.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 8.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 80.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 81.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 82.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 83.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 84.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 85.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 86.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 87.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 88.jpg
- File:Tepe Jen2021-06-08 9.jpg
POS78 (talk) 19:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kohneh Castle (Zendeh Jan)
[edit]بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 10.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 11.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 12.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 13 (cropped).jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 13.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 14 (cropped).jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 14.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 15.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 16.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 17.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 18.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 19.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 2 (cropped).jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 2.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 20.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 21.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 3.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 4.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 5.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 6.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 7.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 8.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021 9.jpg
- File:Zendeh Jan Castle2021.jpg
POS78 (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Imamzadeh Morteza (Kashmar)
[edit]بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
- File:Imamzadeh Morteza2021-06-27 2.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Morteza2021-06-27 3.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Morteza2021-06-27.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 10.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 11.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 12.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 13.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 14.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 15.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 16.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 17.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 2.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 3.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 4.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 5.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 6.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 7.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 8.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 9.jpg
POS78 (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Imamzadeh Morteza (Kashmar)
[edit]بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza 2.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021 2.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021 3.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021 4.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021 5.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021 8.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27.jpg
- File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021.jpg
POS78 (talk) 18:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Danesh House (Kashmar)
[edit]بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
- File:Danesh House2021 10.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 11.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 12.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 13.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 14.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 15.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 16.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 17.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 18.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 19.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 2.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 20.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 21.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 22.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 23.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 24.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 25.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 26.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 27.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 28.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 29.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 3.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 30.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 31.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 32.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 33.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 34.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 35.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 36.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 37.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 38.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 39.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 4.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 40.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 41.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 42.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 43.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 5.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 8.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021 9.jpg
- File:Danesh House2021.jpg
POS78 (talk) 23:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Danesh House (Kashmar)
[edit]بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
POS78 (talk) 08:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Who uploaded these pictures can not be also the author of this very old picture (about Castello Ruggero) presumably dating back to the 1930s; so the author should be "unknown" (not chiccacocò) as well as the date while the license should be in the Public Domain if only we all could know the original creation date of this picture instead of the one of its reproduction. But no one knows the real date so far! Morbius (talk) 11:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted False claims, false license, no info on actual source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Not needed.. ItsSkV08 (talk) 18:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality/resolution, replaced by File:Pencolide Structure.svg. Leyo 19:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete Small/low-res with poor contrast against opaque background. DMacks (talk) 21:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)- Delete per nom. Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (grey) background. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: unidentified logo, nonsensical descritpion, no encyclopedic use CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
"Own work"? From "18 July 2021"? "deutscher Generalmajor der Wehrmacht im Zweiten Weltkrieg ". That is not correct. Jbergner (talk) 06:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- delete: Could be a copy e.g. from [3].--Kuebi (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Description said "Courtesy of Lisa Schmitz". There is no proof that Lisa Schmitz is an employee from NWS, thus the PD license in invalid A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep according to NWS photo submission information "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others." Hence the photos are in the public domain and can be used on Commons ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 16:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated above. It is even stated in the {{PD-NWS}} template that third-party photographs submitted to the NWS "have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 21:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per NWS provisions. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
As much as it pains me to do this because the Wikipedia/Commons collage for 2020 uses this picture; there is simply no way of knowing for sure whether or not this third party file is copyrighted or not. So I am reluctantly renominating this file for deletion. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- I understand that this file was nominated prior and kept; but that was on the pretext that everything on NWS servers are public domain. We have two emails from the weather service that prove that it simply isn’t the case. The NWS does host non-free content and without an email from the weather service (preferably to VRT) confirming the copyright status of this work; the status is very ambiguous. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 14:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Therefore, my vote is conditional delete as the nominator of this file. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Keep - While I honor the ambiguous expression that WestVirginiaWX has expressed, I feel that at the time of uploading and posting on the NWS website, the photo submission guidelines indicating ownership release and entry into the PD was clear. However, that previous page is deprecated. The current legal disclaimer begins clearly with "The information on National Weather Service (NWS) Web pages are in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise" with three exception conditions which have not been met. The photo above, which is still hosted on the NWS-DMX 2020 derecho report, does not note any specific copyright retention. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 22:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Go look at village pump right now and let me know what they say. They want to deprecate the template that this image is using. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- The link they cited in the previous discussion also leads to an error 404 message. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to though; you’re more than welcome to email the weather service and ask them if it’s copyrighted. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Mentioned it on the main post regarding these, but I am emailed DMX and am currently in discussion with them. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 20:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to though; you’re more than welcome to email the weather service and ask them if it’s copyrighted. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- The link they cited in the previous discussion also leads to an error 404 message. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Go look at village pump right now and let me know what they say. They want to deprecate the template that this image is using. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. There's no such thing as the NWS's image submission guidline; just many different image submission guidelines used by different NWS regional offices at different times for different purposes (summary of about 12 known, different, and contradictory ones in another DR here). A couple of them mention the PD, most of them do not. Since we have no way of knowing which (if any) of these the submitter actually used, we have no evidence of permission that the creator released this file into the public domain. --Rlandmann (talk) 04:32, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The image comes from this NWS webpage. At the bottom of the webpage is a disclaimer button. Per that disclaimer, “The information on National Weather Service Web servers and Web sites is in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public.” The caption of the image is: "Corn damaged near Adel. Courtesy of Lisa Schmitz". The bottom of the webpage also directly says, "Media use of NWS Web News Stories is encouraged! Please acknowledge the NWS as the source of any news information accessed from this site."
- For the clause of “specifically annotated otherwise”, NWS either allows the user to add a copyright “©” watermark to the image {as seen in this image, hosted on this NWS webpage} or by directly adding a copyright statement using “©” {as seen on this NWS webpage: difference between the “Tornado Photos” and “Damage” tabs}. That disclaimer is linked at the bottom of all three of the NWS webpages linked above (this image’s webpage + 2 I used as examples). To me, “specifically annotated otherwise” indicates a direct copyright (©) statement or watermark.
- Based on this evidence: (1) There is no clear "specifically annotated otherwise" copyright statements with this image. (2) NWS says to acknowledge them when using info from the webpage. (3) The image is clearly hosted on a web site as well as on the web servers of the National Weather service, indicating the disclaimer can be used. For all of those reasonings, I support keeping this image as it is a public domain image. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Per WeatherWriter. ChessEric (talk) 05:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, submission appears to be through the Des Moines office, which does not have a clear enough terms to be a dedication to the public domain. We'd need VRT permission from Lisa Schmitz. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Photo by David Amelotti per description. There is no proof that he is an employee of NWS, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep according to NWS photo submission information "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others." Hence the photos are in the public domain and can be used on Commons ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 16:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated above. It is even stated in the {{PD-NWS}} template that third-party photographs submitted to the NWS "have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 21:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per NWS provisions. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Cannot find the image on the source, but found many on other sitesCourtesy Mike Zevenbergen @MikeZevenbergen, unlikely to be a work by NWS A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep according to NWS photo submission information "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others." Hence the photos are in the public domain and can be used on Commons ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 16:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated above. It is even stated in the {{PD-NWS}} template that third-party photographs submitted to the NWS "have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above. SHB2000 (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per NWS provisions. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F6|2=courtesy of Jason Ward, not works from NWS A1Cafel (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep according to NWS photo submission information "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others." Hence the photos are in the public domain and can be used on Commons ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 16:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated above. It is even stated in the {{PD-NWS}} template that third-party photographs submitted to the NWS "have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above. SHB2000 (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per NWS provisions. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
This photo was taken in the United States in 2020 by Jason Ward, a firefighter in Ottowa, Illinois.
There is no claim that he was a US Federal government employee performing his duties, or that this image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.
As an image made in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as the image was made.
Prior to the NWS's publication of this photo, a version of it (without the embedded caption that appears on weather.gov) was published by Shaw Media explaining how and where the photo was taken, and its significance.[4]
Not that it's been required since 1989, but Shaw Media's footer includes an explicit copyright notice: "Copyright © 2024 Shaw Local News Network"
The site's copyright policy says "This website (the “Service”) contains material that is protected by international copyright, trademark and other intellectual property laws. Unless otherwise specified, the Service is intended for your personal, noncommercial use only. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute in any way any material, including code and software, from the Service."[5]
This image was uploaded to Commons under rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that
- when the weather.gov general disclaimer says that material not in the public domain will be specifically noted, it means that it must be published with a formal copyright notice. Whereas in reality, not only has the NWS never promised any specific form of notation, there is ample evidence to demonstrate this is not their general practice. This belief also chooses to ignore the words elsewhere in the disclaimer that state that third party images are used by the NWS under license, and to contact the third-party creators for re-use.
- the words of a NWS Sioux City regional office policy that placed some public submissions in the public domain somehow applied to this image, although there is nothing to connect it with that office.
Without clearer evidence that the creator intended to place this image in the public domain, we need to delete this under COM:PRP. Rlandmann (talk) 07:20, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy pings to all editors involved in the previous discussion: @A1Cafel @Gwennie-nyan @TornadoLGS @King of Hearts @SHB2000 Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I believe this is the author's Facebook profile. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Opening to contest speedy deletion ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 17:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep according to NWS photo submission information "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others." Hence the photos are in the public domain and can be used on Commons ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 17:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated above. It is even stated in the {{PD-NWS}} template that third-party photographs submitted to the NWS "have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per NWS provisions. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
This photo was taken in the United States in 2020.
The uploader sourced it to https://www.weather.gov/dmx/2020derecho and authorship and Mike Zevenbergen as the creator.
However, this image is not at that URL, and not in the Internet Archive snapshot two days after it was uploaded to Commons.
TinEye and Google Image searches do not find this image on any NWS site or channel. Other (unfree) sources credit the image to "Tim Rogers".[6][7], and others attribute a number of different people, including "Greg Galbraith For Agri-View"[8]
Bottom line, it appears that the uploader made a good-faith mistake while uploading other similar images, and we have nothing verifiable that connects this image with weather.gov.
Per COM:PRP we should delete this unless verifiable source info becomes available. Rlandmann (talk) 01:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Will as a courtesy ping everyone involved in the previous deletion request: @Gwennie-nyan @TornadoLGS @King of Hearts Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Contesting speedy deletion ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 17:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep according to NWS photo submission information "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others." Hence the photos are in the public domain and can be used on Commons ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 17:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated above. It is even stated in the {{PD-NWS}} template that third-party photographs submitted to the NWS "have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per NWS provisions. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Canadian National Vimy Memorial
[edit]There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in France. This is a monument designed by an artist who died in 1955, hence restore these images only in 2026 (70+1 years) (alas, the COM:URAA problem means 95+1 years after its unveiling, in 2032). Extraterritoriality does not override civil copyright laws, just like the cases of embassy buildings in Paris, Reykjavík, Seoul, and Manila (cities of countries with no commercial FOP's): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Australian Embassy in Paris.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese embassy in Iceland.JPG. See also cases resulting to deletions here.
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 01.jpg
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 02.jpg
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 05.jpg
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 06.jpg
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 07.jpg
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 08.jpg
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 09.jpg
- File:2017-05 Canadian National Vimy Memorial 10.jpg
- File:41SVCBNVIMY.jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090252353).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090253911).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090257583).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090259299).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090269675).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090271437).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090273009).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090279673).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090282703).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090284191).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090285399).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090286665).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090288407).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090290801).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090291951).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090865210).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090878152).jpg
- File:Arras Battlefield, France. Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial. (5090886926).jpg
- File:Canada Bereft (3660805024).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660006281).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660006755).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660007157).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660007641).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660804206).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660804546).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660805386).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660805716).jpg
- File:Canadian National Vimy Memorial (3660806248).jpg
- File:Canadian Vimy Ridge Memorial, France (16947181944).jpg
- File:Canadian Vimy Ridge Memorial, France (17382129690).jpg
- File:Canadian Vimy Ridge Memorial, France (17569602621).jpg
- File:Canadian Vimy Ridge Memorial, France (17569689841).jpg
- File:Canadian-National-Memorial-in-Vimy.JPG
- File:Great War Canadian Memorial at Vimy Ridge, France - panoramio.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 02.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 04.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 05.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 06.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 07.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 08.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 09.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 10.jpg
- File:MemoCanadaVimy 12.jpg
- File:Monument to the Battle of Vimy Ridge.jpg
- File:More of Vimy monument.jpg
- File:Mother Canada Looking over the Douai Plain.JPG
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-26 (24906111203).jpg
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-26 (24920782743).jpg
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-26 (25165273939).jpg
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-26 (25237198420).jpg
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-26 (25414283042).jpg
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-26 (25414284052).jpg
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-26 (25428950002).jpg
- File:Nord-Pas-de-Calais- 2015-12-28 (25592504315).jpg
- File:The Vimy Ridge Memorial.jpg
- File:View of Vimy.jpg
- File:Vimy (58944566).jpeg
- File:Vimy from a distance.jpg
- File:Vimy Memorial angle shot.JPG
- File:Vimy Memorial view SE to Arras.jpg
- File:Vimy Memorial.JPG
- File:Vimy Monument.jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge (219072461).jpeg
- File:Vimy Ridge a Canadian monument.jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge Canadian Memorial - Weeping. . - panoramio.jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial (Detail).jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial - panoramio.jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI male mourner face.JPG
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI Mother Canada overlooks the Somme, closer.JPG
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI Mother Canada overlooks the Somme.JPG
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI Mother Canada shoulders grief.JPG
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI Mother Cananda stands alone.JPG
- File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI woman mourning.JPG
- File:Vimy ridge memorial.jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge Monument at Twilight.JPG
- File:Vimy Ridge War Memorial close up - August 2017.jpg
- File:Vimy Ridge. Canadian WW1 memorial. Northern France.jpg
- File:Vimy sculpture.JPG
- File:Vimy with view of sculptures.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-01-SouthWest side.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-02-SW.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-03-SW.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-04-SW.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-05-SW.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-06-NorthEeast side.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-07-NE.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-08-NE.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-09-NE.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-10-NE.jpg
- File:VimyMemorial-11-NE.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per note on category page and per COM:FOP Canada and per COM:DM Canada... as this is Canadian territory - Been through all this before pls see Commons:Deletion requests/Canadian National Vimy Memorial and Category talk:Canadian National Vimy Memorial - history of topic should be reviewed before nomination [9]Moxy (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - The Vimy Memorial is Canadian territory, and has been since 1922.[10] FOP applies in Canada, therefore these are all free from copyright. - Floydian (talk) 14:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Moxy and Floydian: see w:Talk:Canadian National Vimy Memorial#Status of land. In a nutshell, the area remains under French territory. Canada was only granted free use to erect this monument and establish the park, but not ultimate sovereignty. The fact that a French couple found to be engaging sex at this area was tried at a French court demostrates that French laws still apply to this piece of land. French laws include copyright laws and the laws that were relevant to the case against the couple. As Skeezix1000 once pointed out, "the theory about the memorial being Canadian territory is a bit of an urban legend, similar to the widespread and mistaken (belief) that embassies are extraterritorial their host countries." The old, 2008-era DR is no longer relevant today. Plus a large boilerplate {{NoUploads}} tag is attached on top of the category. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Land granted by France to the Canadian people.....France deemed the area surrounding the monument, about 1 km², to be Canadian territory in 1922.[11] With sercurty provided by the french government at no charge [12]--Moxy (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- See Wikidata item Canadian National Vimy Memorial (Q2561040), that has statement country (P17): France (Q142). Also this area don't have border lines shown on several online map services, especially the OpenStreetMap, no doubt that the sovereignty belongs to France. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Land granted by France to the Canadian people.....France deemed the area surrounding the monument, about 1 km², to be Canadian territory in 1922.[11] With sercurty provided by the french government at no charge [12]--Moxy (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, the land is not Canadian sovereign territory, and the copyright should follow its designer Walter Seymour Allward who died in 1955 (so PD in
2025per COM:FRANCE edit: 2032 per COM:URAA). Expanding on these points:- The land under Vimy Memorial obeys French laws not Canadian. There is no border. Canada essentially 'owns' the land.
- Commons:Deletion requests/Canadian National Vimy Memorial was kept not because the land follows Canadian law (it was agreed that it doesn't), but because it was a "collective work" rather than a work primarily by en:Walter Seymour Allward. I disagree with this assertion. The design of this work is widely credited to Allward and not a team or a firm - en:Canadian National Vimy Memorial credits him personally in the intro and infobox, correctly reflecting secondary sources - so the copyright should follow him.
- Furthermore, as OP linked (but I missed during my initial post), the precedent on Commons is to delete Vimy Memorial images due to COM:FOP France: see Category:Vimy_Memorial-related_deletion_requests which is a subcategory of Category:French FOP cases/deleted. -M.nelson (talk) 16:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @M.nelson: COM:URAA issue exists however. Likely this may be OK for restoration in 2032 (95+1 years after its unveiling). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I wasn't familiar with URAA. -M.nelson (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Land granted by France to the Canadian people.....France deemed the area surrounding the monument, about 1 km², to be Canadian territory in 1922.[13] With sercurty provided by the french government at no charge....think a call to the RCMP is viable for sercurty. [14]. See no sources contradicting sources presented here.....just guess work based on a sex act.--Moxy (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Moxy: I don't read anything in that treaty document that suggests that Canada has sovereignty over the land, in fact it suggests that the land is still held by the French government: "The land is to be acquired by the French Government at the cost of the French nation, and held in perpetuity by it for use by the Canadian Government for a specific purpose, namely the erection of a monument and the creation of a park." -M.nelson (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- ➕ Adding to my deletion rationale, per Veterans Affairs Canada: "It is sometimes suggested that this land is part of Canada. This is not strictly correct. In 1922, the French Government granted "freely, and for all time, to the Government of Canada the free use of the land exempt from all taxes". Unlike an embassy, it is subject to the laws of France and the French police are responsible for law and order." -M.nelson (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I know this is a strange concept to the copyright police, but has anybody actually tried contacting the Vimy Foundation, Veterans Affair Canada, or whatever non-existent French organisation handles the memorial? Instead of pointlessly debating your personal opinion of sovereign territorial copyright claims, try contacting the actual people who know what they're talking about. - Floydian (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- I emailed the operator of this monument, any responds will be transfered to our VRT. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Cool. Let's run off that. Specifically ask if the memorial is or isn't exempt from France's panorama laws. The rest of this is just random barking without purpose. - Floydian (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- This isn't an unusual situation, at least not in relation to Commons deletion requets. There have been a couple dozen deletion requests that concern french FoP of WWI monuments. This includes those raised by foreign governments (ex:American) whose monuments have the same (general) legal status as this case here.--Labattblueboy (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- I emailed the operator of this monument, any responds will be transfered to our VRT. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The reasons are already well covered. The land treaty for the Vimy site is easily accessible and offers no exception to french law. The question is not whether there is an exception under french copying (there isn't except for de minimis) but whether 1. Allward assigned copyright to the crown in his contract or 2. The Allward estate waived the copyright under french law. This pair of questions would likely be quickly answered if someone had the opportunity to examine the Allward fonds at Queen's University or a thorough examination of Canadian Battlefields Memorials Commission minutes. Short or someone holding up a piece of paper that shows Allward waived copyright we must defer to the assumption that Allward (and now his estate) still hold copyright in France. It's all an academic exercise as there is almost zero prospect of a copyvio claim ever being raised in France, but here we are. I'm not happy with the idea of deletion and am personally against it but there is no fault in the logic.--Labattblueboy (talk) 19:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except for the pictures where the building is "de minimis". --Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, unidentified location and subject. Fl.schmitt (talk) 13:38, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No, see FOP Senegal. --Ras67 (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination : architect Pierre Goudiaby Atepa is still alive. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
As per this discussion in the Administrators noticeboard, this sign don't exist in Uganda, and the source is falsy stated as to be from "Uganda Traffic Signs Manual" see [15]. It is an invention of the uploader, therefore it is out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The image can be restored if a more complete version of the Uganda Traffic Signs Manual becomes available and this sign appears in it. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
No evidence the sign is now or has ever been used in Mauritius. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Then why are there checkpoint regulatory signs? Kingwarnen (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- The UK has checkpoint regulatory signs, but not checkpoint warning signs. Your point is invalid. Fry1989 eh? 19:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The image appears to have simply been borrowed from the manuals of Bangladesh and Nepal. Fry1989 eh? 19:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Why are you always snitching? You always care about the actual sources! Kingwarnen (talk) 19:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Kingwarnen: Why are you stating that signs are already in use in particular places without evidence? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
This is out of scope. The first one is amateur poem in which author thanks a medicine professor for curing his wife in very ornated style. Probably to be used in biography of entitled professor. The second one is another, very personal poem written by the same author. The author of these poems sent to VTRS a proper copyright agreement, but it hardly make sense to proceed, as the file is out of scope. Polimerek (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021071810002993 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 18:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Dziękuję Profesorze.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021071810002993. --Polimerek (talk) 18:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 06:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
copy Kiditaliancrush (talk) 04:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: unintelligible rationale. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Seems to be a copyright violation as it is a screenshot of a tv show and is not “ for identification of and critical commentary on the television program and its contents”. Mason 39 (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 07:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Appeared previously online: https://metalmagazine.eu/en/post/interview/jason-ebeyer-neon-gods. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
The better version on Commons: File:Stairs to Exit 6, Ximen Station 20190812.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurry image. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Basra Sport City
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Iraq. The stadium was completed in 2012 and designed by w:360 Architecture. COM:VRT permission for CC/PD licensing from 360 Architecture is required as the country does not grant freedom of panorama for free commercial uses of images of works of architecture and public art still under copyright protection.
- File:Basra International Stadium.JPG
- File:Basra International Stadium2.jpg
- File:BasraCity.jpg
- File:Basrah sport city 2010 summer 6 - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Basra Sport City
[edit]Per COM:FOP Iraq, buildings are considered copyrighted art.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
+3 more images of the building
- File:Basrah City'deki Jethe Alnakhla Stadyumu.jpg
- File:Stadium jethe alnakhla in basrah city.jpg
- File:ملعب جذع النخلة في مدينة البصرة.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Patrick Michael Copyright holder Patrick Michael". OTRS permission from Patrick Michael needed. MKFI (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Watermark and file EXIF shows "Author MARC A FONG JR Copyright holder Marc A Fong Jr 2016". OTRS from Marc Fong needed. MKFI (talk) 12:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masheehan11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All other images by this uploader have been nominated for deletion separately. I was not immeadiately able to find these two in the web but given the other uploads I strongly suspect these are not own work as claimed.
MKFI (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kendry Paulina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 22:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
No Creative Commons license on current or archived YouTube pages. Sorry. GRuban (talk) 19:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
©EMRNetherlands, no Creative Commons license on current or archived YouTube pages. GRuban (talk) 19:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Moyai
[edit]The statue of Moyai (ja:モヤイ像) at en:Shibuya Station (ja:渋谷駅) was created by Yuichi Daigo (ja:大後友市) in 1980. The year of his death is 2010. [16] No FoP in Japan for 3D works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moyai Statue.jpg.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Moyai
[edit]The statue of Moyai (ja:モヤイ像) at en:Kamata Station (Tokyo) (ja:蒲田駅) was erected in 1984. [17] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Moyai
[edit]The statue of Moyai (ja:モヤイ像) at Odaiba Marine Park (ja:お台場海浜公園) was erected in 平成24年 (=2012). [18] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Gualtiero Galmanini & Piero Portaluppi project of Banco Ambrosiano of Milan, 1960-1966.jpg
[edit]No permission from the architects Gualtiero Galmanini and Piero Portaluppi (died 1976 and 1967 respectively); apparently copied from the internet, see http://www.portaluppi.org/en/opere/ampliamento-della-sede-del-banco-ambrosiano/. Block evasion, WP:LTA/Alec Smithson. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
COPYVIO - this is a widely shared promo image posted across the Internet, e.g. here - https://wallpapercave.com/abir-chatterjee-wallpapers AAhelifan (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
I am the digital manager of the artist and I have official permission to use this picture in the Wikipedia infobox. Please reverse the deletion. -Swasti2 (talk)
- Prove it. See Commons:OTRS. --AAhelifan (talk) 15:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 12:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Very clearly a publicity photo - part of the same 2019 photoshoot that produced this image - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=331209065036462&set=pb.100044421129825.-2207520000..&type=3 AAhelifan (talk) 09:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 12:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Çünkü o Logo Kerem Sezen 23:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: any logos are clearly DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Diagrama filogenético de macacos e Homo compreendendo os últimos 20 Ma, com diferentes fósseis.png
[edit]There was a mistake in the uploaded image BIO0309 (talk) 00:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
this is my own image and you dont have copyright for its. It is hurting my reputation is a founder of SGG World — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.18.137 (talk • contribs) 2021-07-17T22:58:08 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Substantial portion of Tour Perret, a copyrighted work of architecture by Auguste Perret, is seen here. There is no Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama in France. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tour Perret in Grenoble and Commons:Deletion requests/Buildings by Auguste Perret in France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2025. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Not Epud's own work, its from an old newspaper, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 04:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
This image ought not be deleted. It was taken by his son Rolf Strøm who has given me permission to use it. I am not familiar with the procedures to get it reinstated, but I will look it up. I am still learning about who to edit articles in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epud (talk • contribs) 14:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:HumanxAnthro
[edit]- File:SeanAJW2021.png
- File:AudraMcDonaldMIT2018 (8).png
- File:AudraMcdonaldMIT2018 (7).png
- File:AudraMcdonaldMIT2018 (6).png
- File:AudraMcdonald2018 (5).png
- File:AudraMcdonald2018 (4).png
- File:AudraMcdonaldmIT2018 (3).png
- File:AudraMcdonaldMIT2018 (2).png
- File:AudraMcdonaldMIT2018.png
- File:LetitaWright2018.png
- File:CarolinaAlves2020.png
- File:MikePollock2014.png
- File:KennethCopeland2018.png
- File:DonLeGreca2018.png
- File:DanikaMcGuiganADIFF.png
- File:DanPena2019.png
- File:SteveRowe2014.png
- File:FreddieJackson2019.png
(See also COM:Deletion requests/File:Davidpakanrebelwisom2019.png and the first version of File:NomikiKonstHumanistReport.png)
User:HumanxAnthro systematically uploads the deliberately chosen video screen grabs with unnatural grimaces of public persons. It's COM:PEOPLE#Defamation. --INS Pirat (talk) 04:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination is a personal attack and an aspersion. Seriously? "Deliberately chosen" to be defamatory? I never upload Creative Commons screenshots with the thought that they'd look bad, and stating that a user "deliberately" uploaded unflattering images to defame them is well into aspersion and personal-attack territory. I'm not seeing anything "unnatural" about these photos, and a many of these images (Don Le Greca, Kenneth Copeland, Mike Pollock, Carolina Alves, Freddie Jackson for instance) have been on the English Wikipedia pages for awhile, which indicates no user besides yourself finds them defamatory or unflattering enough to remove them. If you have a problem with any of them, please talk about it on my talk page so I can update the screenshots with new ones instead of pulling off this disruptive bundle nomination. HumanxAnthro (talk) 13:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- On a side note, bundle nominations (as with many of those on Wikipedia's AFD) is a bad idea even if done in good faith, since a variety of facial expressions are made between the subjects of the photos and it's not very likely every person will find all of these photos being unflattering. HumanxAnthro (talk) 17:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nomination. I agree that these images are poor screengrabs. It would be so simple to select a better, more neutral image from the videos than these. Kept some that are in use, but they can be overwritten by a better image from the source videos. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Unclear license status. No evidence of CC-BY-SA 4.0. {{PDMark-owner}} does not apply since the image is clearly a scan from a newspaper or the like and is therefore not the Flickr uploader's own work. According to https://brucehunt.co.uk/bere%20ferrers%20and%20the%20bere%20peninsula/camping%20coaches.html, this image is of UK origin, and depicts a Southern Railway camping coach at Bere Ferrers railway station, which means this image was taken sometime between 1935 (introduction of camping coaches on Southern Railway) and 1948 (Southern Railway's nationalisation). Therefore, it was still in 70pma UK copyright on the 1996 UK URAA date, and might still be in copyright in the US today. Alex Cohn (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
These two are old photos that are unlikely to be self-photographed images of the uploader. Probably scanned images of old images. There are no information that can verify if these two may pass {{PD-Iraq}}. But also, these might have been published elsewhere. When and where was these two first published.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:52, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. TinEye searches reveal numerous instances of [19], dating back to 2008. The one provided by TinEye though is in lower resolution and has lighter brightness, but the scenery and the position of objects and people are very much the same. This means this file might have been taken elsewhere, or maybe a scan from a book. But nevertheless not own work as claimed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Strange transmission code. Appears to have been first published on Twitter at https://mobile.twitter.com/hussein_74/status/1351552270152957953. Unsure if the uploader and the Twitter user are the same person, but if ever, then it is still unacceptable: images first published on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media platforms require verification of identity and confirmation of use of free license via COM:VRT correspondence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Published on Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/photos/QUfY0hpULc0) under Unsplash license, which I do not believe meets Commons:Licensing. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Previously published: https://www.southwales.ac.uk/news/news-2021/usw-launches-music-internship-grammy-nominated-producer/. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Previously published: https://kianorshah.com/about/. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Image has been published previously: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-today/news/peter-adams-dont-confuse-mental-health-with-addiction/PXFEOB4NAGRN36Z7QLLVISYG2M/, OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
personal information Valisport24 (talk) 10:12, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is a Keep because this shows what are Soyabeans, how these plants are harvested, and at some point, shows the daily life of a farmer. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no personal info here. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
permission from person in photo has been revoked SwissTech8002 (talk) 10:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: license is irrevocable, no alternatives available. Moreover, what proof is there that nominator represents the person in the photo?. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
would self delete but do not have user permission, photo outdated SwissTech8002 (talk) 10:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused low-res image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Unusable because of small size and bad quality. Fl.schmitt (talk) 10:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
This user uploads files that comes from the Internet (copyvio, see File:Laaounate.jpg for example). Here I can't find the source, but it seems the file is photoshoped (Moon, etc.). Jules* (talk) 11:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 10:53, 18 July 2021, by Minorax. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Scope Mel22 (talk) 14:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Request from the maker: on ar.wiki باسم (talk) 14:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
This sign does not exist in the Jamaican Traffic Control Devices Manual. Without a source, it should not be on Commons.. Fry1989 eh? 20:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom and Commons:PRP. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Re-uploaded unsourced content. Fry1989 eh? 15:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
This image is not contained within the Jamaican traffic signs manual and was uploaded by a user that has uploaded similarly unsourced and counter-sourced content. Fry1989 eh? 15:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Description said "Courtesy Gail S.", and there is no proof that Gail S. is an employee from NWS, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep @A1Cafel: It doesn't matter whether "Gail S" is an NWS employee. As the {{PD-NWS}} template on the image page states "...the NWS sites also host non-NWS images which have been submitted by individuals: these are generally shown as "Courtesy of ...". Such images have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 16:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is also stated on the NWS website. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is a ridiculous amount of trouble to go to just to try and delete something on such an easily disproven basis. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per reasons given by User:TornadoLGS. Looks like somebody is trying to set a record for deletion nominations. Ugh! --Nelson Ricardo 2500 (talk) 21:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- There's already a thread open on much that basis: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#A1Cafel and yet more abusive deletions Andy Dingley (talk) 23:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Description said "Courtesy Gail S.", and there is no proof that Gail S. is an employee from NWS, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't matter whether "Gail S" is an NWS employee. As the {{PD-NWS}} template on the image page states "...the NWS sites also host non-NWS images which have been submitted by individuals: these are generally shown as "Courtesy of ...". Such images have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." TornadoLGS (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is also stated on the NWS website. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:TornadoLGS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aladdin Fabio Meier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly scanned, unknown source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Logo Swiss Post.svg with wrong yellow colour. (Sorry for having created a duplicate – i didn't see this file.) Dafadllyn (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
No indication that this is a notable person, from the categories. Not used anywhere. Out of COM:SCOPE Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Schweizerische Post Logo.svg Dafadllyn (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
low resolution copy of an already existing fileː File:Babri Masjid.jpg Oo91 (talk) 18:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- and derivative crop: File:Trifonov (cropped).jpg
Dubious own work, published on many other websites before it was uploaded to Commons:
- https://www.flagman.bg/article/188614
- https://www.marica.bg/lajfstajl/parite-svrshiha-slavi-trifonov-sprq-krancheto-na-aktorite
Yeeno (talk) 18:52, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation -- media without proper permission Rino ap Codkelden (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
redundant to File:Dsc 302-panorama (49257712878).jpg (uploader's request) Tokfo (talk) 19:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
redundant to File:DSC 0751 (49257975646).jpg (uploader's request) Tokfo (talk) 19:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
temporary art - was there, only for one exhibition in 2011 Munf (talk) 21:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Elliot & Fry was in activity until 1962, death year of the photographer is unknown, and copyright is possibly owned by NPG. — Racconish 💬 15:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:EVID: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable license." This has been uploaded with a nonsense {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license (the NPG source has a cc-by-NC-ND license (!!!)) and no plausible PD rationale. The UK, for example, is generally a pma + 70 country; 1957 + 70 + 1 = 01.01.2028. --Эlcobbola talk 21:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Low quality (in terms of representation of subject) video - we have (lots of...!) better videos of such things. firefly ( t · c ) 09:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: very short footage with pracitcally nothing happening, no educational value. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Afghanistan. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
File:84 degrees, 92 percent humidity, and the Shrine isn't even visible. It's being rebuilt. (29268970246).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 05:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately I can't see a Creative Commons license either on the current or any archived pages. GRuban (talk) 19:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @GRuban: (An extremely belated reply) That's because there is no CC license. File is properly tagged, and noted, as a work created by an agent or entity of The State of Florida – thus, in the Public Domain. Commons is not limited to works solely licensed under CC – see: COM:L. --dsprc (talk) 14:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Right, and a municipal or county library qualifies. Sorry about that, withdrawing the request. --GRuban (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: nomination withdrawn. --dsprc (talk) 11:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation, one picture is not from city, perhaps confusion with this Waran18 (talk) 10:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 22:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
The claim of this being "own work" suggests Cage himself uploaded it. I find that hard to take at face value. It doesn't help that there's no source URL; having one would at least help show it's authentic. Let's not risk including potential fabrications. I say just delete the file altogether. SNUGGUMS (talk) 02:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:SIG United States signatures are not copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Das ist keine Kopie eines Kunstwerkes sondern eine seit Jahrhunderten benutzte Darstellung eines Teddybären. Löschtroll nicht füttern. Ralf Roletschek 09:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It might be that teddybears are in use, but it is not shown that this particular design has been licenced with a free licence or is in public domain. --Ellywa (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope fetish videos of no encyclopedic use or educational value.
- File:A Nudist Man Masturbates with Moaning and Squirming While Wearing Only Strappy Sandals.ogv
- File:A Nudist Man Masturbates with Moaning and Squirming While Wearing Only Strappy Sandals - Full Version.ogv
- File:A Man Publicly Submits to a Life of Naked Service and Obedience.ogv
firefly ( t · c ) 09:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oddman47
[edit]- Oddman47 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Same reason as before. It looks like this user uses Commons as his private nudism collection. This deletion request applies to ALL of his images. --D-Kuru (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Recently deleted by the same user: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Man Wearing Only White Ankle Socks and Sandals Assumes A Sexually-Inviting Submissive Pose.jpg --D-Kuru (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at the user’s talk page shows that files by this user are routinely deleted as out of scope, with the keeps being largely arbitrary. Dronebogus (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Basically a whole lot of thinly veiled exhibitionism that’s been allowed to stay for too long. The non-exhibitionist images are just personal photos with nothing notable about them
- File:A Naked Man at a Party Shows Off His Erection for the Camera.jpg
- File:Decorated shaved male genitals.jpg
- File:A Contemplative Moment During an Extended Nude Photo Session.jpg
- File:Displayed Naked Outdoors in a Lawn Chair - 2.jpg
- File:Displayed Naked Outdoors in a Lawn Chair - 1.jpg
- File:Bare Feet with Slave Chain and Tags.jpg
- File:A Nudist Man Poses on a Log After Skinnydipping.jpg
- File:At the Coast Wearing a Skirt, Tank Top, and Strappy Sandals.jpg
- File:Cool Hiking In The Woods Naked Wearing Only White Ankle Socks And Sandals.jpg
- File:Nudist Man Practicing Yoga by a Lake.jpg
- File:Chained naked and humiliated in the woods.jpg
- File:Nudist Man with Vibrator Butt Plug Inserted.jpg
- File:Naked in thePapasan and Aroused Looking at Feet.jpg
- File:Embarrased Nudist Earlier.jpg
- File:Feels Good to be Naked on the Back Porch.jpg
- File:Nudist Man Reading a Book with his Legs Spread Wide.jpg
- File:Man Wearing Only White Ankle Socks and Sandals with Legs Spread and a Partial Erection.jpg
- File:Nudist Man Drinking Coffee from a Mug with his Legs Spread Apart.jpg
- File:Daydreaming Nudist 3.jpg
- File:Daydreaming Nudist 2.jpg
- File:Daydreaming Nudist 1.jpg
- File:Lust for Sandwich.jpg
- File:Dressed for a Party in a Costume Hat with Socks and Sandals.jpg
- File:Cleaning House Wearing a Short White Skirt with Socks and Sandals.jpg
- File:Heading Out On The Bike.jpg
- File:Bare Feet and Leg of a Man Lounging on a Couch.jpg
- File:Experimental ED Treatment with Additional Magnets.jpg
- File:A Nudist Man Brushing His Hair.jpg
- File:Sleeping Nudist Man.jpg
- File:Embarrassed Nudist.jpg
- File:Cool Weather Calls For Socks And Sandals.jpg
- File:Experimental ED Treatment with Magnets.jpg
- File:Autoerotic Saturday Night.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 05:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator and NOTHOST or whatever the guideline is. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:NUDITY and out of scope
- File:Nudist Man Reading A Book And Lying On His Back.jpg
- File:Man in bed with morning wood and wearing only white ankle socks.jpg
- File:Nudist Man Reading A Book - Alternate.jpg
- File:Nudist Man Reading A Book.jpg
- File:Ankle Socks in Bed.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 21:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + three more not listed for the same reason. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Very poor quality video - we have lots of(!) better videos of this act. firefly ( t · c ) 09:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Very low quality video, we have lots of better videos of this act. firefly ( t · c ) 09:38, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope fetish video - Commons does not need a video of someone masturbating into a water wing. firefly ( t · c ) 09:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
The logo seems to be a property of India Post. The website https://www.indiapost.gov.in/VAS/Pages/Content/disclaimer.aspx does not allow us to upload without permission. What is the rationale if this is to be kept? -- DaxServer (talk) 10:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is probably simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}} per COM:TOO India. ✗plicit 01:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment (from nom): The EN wiki equivalent (or mostly similar) was converted to non-free rationale (link) -- DaxServer (talk) 08:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creative effort of the designer. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Indiscriminate and largely useless uploads from YouTube, the titles of many of which are BLP violations.
- File:House Democrat Rep. Emanuel Cleaver closes prayer with "AMEN AND AWOMAN".webm
- File:Speaker Nancy Pelosi FORGETS George Floyd's Name; Calls him George Kirby - Epic Fail.webm
- File:Ali Dawah defending Muhammad's paedophilia and said a 9 year old child like Aisha are woman - Muslim apologists.webm
- File:Vice President Kamala Harris threatening immigrants of Guatemala not to enter the USA.webm
- File:Where are your Jews - Hillel Neuer silences the UN after Islamic countries accuses Israel of apartheid - Where are the Jews of Islamic countries, what happened to Jews of Arab and Muslim countries.webm
- File:Afghan woman beaten to death by an angry crowd.webm
- File:Disturbing Footage Emerges Of Taliban Stoning 19-year-old Afghan woman.webm
- File:Taliban Punishment of Young Girl - Public beating of women by terrorists.webm
- File:Taliban Beat 17 Year Old Girl In Swat Valley.webm
- File:Palestinians celebrated September 11 attacks.webm
- File:Palestinians Celebrating September 11 attacks ; fall of the twin towers on 9-11, old but shocking footage.webm
- File:Islam, Culture and Sexism- What Needs to Change-.webm
- File:Dr. Nader Hashemi - The Menace of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) - 20 Nov 2014.webm
- File:Islamic State in 5 minutes.webm
- File:Palestinian Antisemitism in York University Canada.webm
- File:Palestinian Antisemitism at UC Irvine.webm
- File:Hate speech from Shaykh Anwar Sahib - anti-Semitism, anti-women.webm
- File:Palestinian Anti-Semitism in New York’s Times Square.webm
- File:Results of Arab Pogrom in Lod - a Children's Classroom.webm
- File:Why is the UN Biased Against Israel.webm
- File:The Real Apartheid in Hebron.webm
- File:The 1929 Hebron Massacre - Nothing Has Changed!.webm
- File:Does Israel have the right to kick out the 'Human Rights Activists' of anti-Israel BDS.webm
- File:What Happens When a Muslim Women Enters a Jewish Town.webm
- File:A Palestinian Sheikh Finds Shelter in Jewish Settlement.webm
- File:How to help the Palestinians of Gaza, and what Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas wants.webm
- File:Boomerang - Teenage Palestinian terror is becoming commonplace.webm
- File:Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas attacks civilians cruise ship in Israel with rockets.webm
- File:10 Hours of -f20091 (Deeppink).webm
- File:10 Hours of -e5a800 (Orange).webm
- File:10 Hours of -f20054 (Crimson).webm
firefly ( t · c ) 12:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- The first video listed ("Amen and awomen") is CSPAN footage of a Congressional proceeding, so it falls under PD CSPAN. The Ali Dawah seems to be uploaded by its creator under a CC BY license, but it's of a random non-notable YouTuber so it's probably out of scope. The final three videos are too simple to hold copyright over, but they're also out of scope. Mcrsftdog (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
I believe the second one also falls under the “PD-CSPAN” license, though it seriously needs a better title— Wikimedia Commons is not a place for hosting biased personal attacks unless it’s for neutral documentation purposes. I’m troubled by the fact that this user seems to be obsessed to dumping huge amounts of rightwing/anti-Islam/pro-Israel/pro-Jewish content on WM Commons without regard to licensing or educational usefulness with what is potentially a deliberate NPOV violation (of course considering they are so indiscriminate as to upload videos consisting entirely of a blank field of one color…).Dronebogus (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)The fourth one may also apply to the CSPAN thing, but also needs a better title. Additionally most of these are probably out of scope even if they are properly licensed— Wikipedia isn’t a distribution platform for non-historically-important propaganda or random people’s unreliable opinions.Dronebogus (talk) 20:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all islamophobic propaganda or blatantly terrible uploads. none of these files are useful or uploaded in good faith. Even the PD ones are just LOL LOOK AT DA STUPID LIBS propaganda/trolling. Just dump the lot. Dronebogus (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Many copyvios (CNN, ABC, etc) with potentially offensive titles. All unused. Not worth the effort of identifying and renaming the useful/free ones - we can probably depend on other good faith editors to upload useful CSPAN/etc videos. -M.nelson (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Памятник "Сергею Перхуну от болельщиков" возле входа в Приднепровскую государственную академию физической культуры и спорта.jpg
[edit]There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no COM:FOP Ukraine. The statue was probably built in or after 2001 when its subject died, so not yet PD in Ukraine. -M.nelson (talk) 23:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France Teofilo (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Mais encore ? Could you be more specific? Is it related to the station building, probably designed by a french architect ? Croquant (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. I am not very fond of this law, but this is the law. Dura lex, sed lex as they say in latin. Teofilo (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. howcheng {chat} 00:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France. A probable different image of the same name was deleted more than 10 years ago. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:12, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Pourquoi cette photo et pas les autres représentant le même bâtiment ? D'autant qu'il s'agit d'un bâtiment centenaire, sans architecte attitré. Un bâtiment banal des années 30. Conserver. Cramos (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Although FOP doesn't exist in France, this building shows no originality of design, it is just utilitarian, so not copyrightable. Stifle (talk) 15:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This station is a new design. It seems to me not purely utilitarian, the large windows are carefully placed. Indeed, there are more in the same category which might be nominated for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
As usual, user Лобачев Владимир continues to create fake, historically inaccurate flags and coat of arms. He himself modified historically accurate flag and uploaded this file. It should be deleted to avoid confusion as it is historically inaccurate. The symbol on the horse rider's shield is the Double Cross of the Jagiellonian dynasty (the most important national symbol of Lithuania after the horse rider itself). Violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX rules.
-
The initial file which was modified without any valid reasons
-- Pofka (talk) 12:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep On all stamps of Central Lithuania and in the Official Gazette of the Provisional Administrator of the Commission of Central Lithuania (polish Litwa Środkowa. Dziennik Urzędowy Tymczasowej Komisji Rządzącej) No. 1, November 17, 1920, the coat of arms is one-color.
- The website heraldicum.ru states that the Polish eagle and the Lithuanian Pursuit were silver: “the coat of arms was a red dissected shield, in the right scarlet field there was a Polish silver one-headed crowned eagle, in the left scarlet field there was a silver Lithuanian Pahonia”. Where does blue come from? Just because it is so on the modern coat of arms of the Republic of Lithuania after 1991? There is not a single document that speaks of a blue saddle and a rider's shield. This is an original user research. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The eagle/rider are depicted as white/silver in all sources and the decree which defined the flag when the state was established[20] seems to agree with this depiction --Havsjö (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
As usual, user Лобачев Владимир continues to create fake, historically inaccurate flags and coat of arms. He himself modified historically accurate coat of arms and uploaded this file. It should be deleted to avoid confusion as it is historically inaccurate. The symbol on the horse rider's shield is the Double Cross of the Jagiellonian dynasty (the most important national symbol of Lithuania after the horse rider itself). Violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX rules.
-
The initial file which was modified without any valid reasons
-- Pofka (talk) 12:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep On all stamps of Central Lithuania and in the Official Gazette of the Provisional Administrator of the Commission of Central Lithuania (polish Litwa Środkowa. Dziennik Urzędowy Tymczasowej Komisji Rządzącej) No. 1, November 17, 1920, the coat of arms is one-color.
- The website heraldicum.ru states that the Polish eagle and the Lithuanian Pursuit were silver: “the coat of arms was a red dissected shield, in the right scarlet field there was a Polish silver one-headed crowned eagle, in the left scarlet field there was a silver Lithuanian Pahonia”. Where does blue come from? Just because it is so on the modern coat of arms of the Republic of Lithuania after 1991? There is not a single document that speaks of a blue saddle and a rider's shield. This is an original user research. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Russian sources are not reliable when we speak about other countries and mostly are full of propaganda in the Russian Federation. -- Pofka (talk) 08:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Here is a color image of the coat of arms (source). This is a Dutch source. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- But the use of blue in the coat of arms is not even in Lithuanian sources. The blue coat of arms is a fake. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
As usual, user Лобачев Владимир continues to create fake, historically inaccurate flags and coat of arms. He himself modified historical image and uploaded this file. It should be deleted to avoid confusion as it is historically inaccurate. Violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX rules.
-
The original image, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius -
The original image, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius
,_coat_of_arms_of_Lithuania,_designed_by_Antanas_%C5%BDmuidzinavi%C4%8Dius.jpg)
.png)
-- Pofka (talk) 12:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Here are the real originals:
-
Base geometry: The Vytis of Antanas Žmuidzinavičius, 1917 -
Base colors: The Vytis of Antanas Žmuidzinavičius, 1918
-
Vytis of Antanas Žmuidzinavičius, 1917.svg
- --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Second image is from a random website and is a modified version of the original image created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius (it was not modified by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius and it is just some kind of modern interpretation done by somebody). While third image was created by Лобачев Владимир himself. Thus the second image is also historically inaccurate and I nominated for deletion it as well. Second and third images should be deleted. -- Pofka (talk) 19:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Similar colors of the coat of arms on the flag of the Lithuanian public organization. From the funds of the M. K. Čiurlionis National Art Museum. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 03:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Used generated coat of arms, which violate Wikipedia:HOAX and COM:NOTHOST rules. This file is a mixture of two authentic illustrations: 1, 2, but varies from both, thus it is just a WP:OR. This should be deleted in order not to create confusion. Violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX rules.
-
Coat of arms depicted on the passport
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo_2019.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![122 File:Памятник "Сергею Перхуну от болельщиков" возле входа в Приднепровскую государственную академию физической культуры и спорта.jpg](#File:Памятник_"Сергею_Перхуну_от_болельщиков"_возле_входа_в_Приднепровскую_государственную_академию_физической_культуры_и_спорта.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[19]](http://www.iraqwho.com/photo/images/QURNA.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo_2019.svg){kind=link}
_Logo_2019.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Logo_2019.svg){kind=link}
_Logo_2019.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Similar nomination as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms on the Foreign Passport of the Republic of Lithuania 1940.png. -- Pofka (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep How can you call a drawing from a real document a hoax? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
According to {{PD-RU-exempt}} this license tag is not applicable to drafts of official documents, proposed official symbols and signs, which can be copyrighted. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyrighted material. --Ellywa (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as no permission (No permission since) MGA73 (talk) 14:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I agree that watermarks is not a good sign. A similar watermark can be seen on File:Yuseong Bus Route 03.jpg. But the photos are taken with a SONY DSC-W7 and so are a few other photos: File:A city bus that has just arrived at Jecheon Station.jpg and File:The Jecheon city bus 3947.jpg. Those photos also have watermarks but the watermark on those photos is an URL and the name of the uploader. I can't read the Korean text so I have no idea what it says. Uploader is no longer active so we won't get a permission or answers. We have to decide if the watermark makes the claim of own work doubtful or not. --MGA73 (talk) 14:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader is a train enthousiast regarding their uploads, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/%EC%B6%A9%EB%B6%81%EC%84%A0_%EB%AC%B4%EA%B6%81%ED%99%94%ED%98%B8&ilshowall=1. I have no reason to think this photo is not their own. It is not a professional image taken from a company website. Therefore decided to keep this image;. --Ellywa (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image was previously marked as copyvio by me, this was reverted by @Andre Carrotflower: with the reason "Source image is public domain due to age". I do not see any indication, neither here nor on the source page, why this is the case. The two marked licenses are contradictory, for PD-old-70 a known author and his date of death is needed, for PD-Czechoslovakia-anon an anonymous publication and the date thereof is needed. None of this information is provided. Andel (talk) 15:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The use of an incorrect template was an oversight on my part, but the image falls in the public domain nonetheless. The source page makes it clear that the photo portrait of this football player was published during his playing career, which ended in 1931. Therefore, the requirements in PD-Czechoslovakia-anon are fulfilled and the file has been updated to reflect that. -- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with the age, but I still think there is more information needed to keep this image on Commons. Beside the age, the first publication of an image needs to be anonymous, in Czechoslovakia, and between the years 1925 and 1946 for it to falls under PD-Czechoslovakia-anon. Without further information when and where it was first published, there is no way to say if this applies and if the image is in the public domain or not. --Andel (talk) 07:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. What we would need is a newspaper from before 1946 to show that the image has been published anonymous. If you can find that, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
the variations in colour probably make the logo copyrightable. RZuo (talk) 16:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator failed to quote the copyright laws of Nepal re. TOO. "Probably" doesn't really cut it. — kashmīrī 19:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete We don't have a policy COM:TOO Tajikistan, but this would exceed the TOO in many countries. It doesn't meet the criteria for PD in {{PD-TJ-exempt}}. -M.nelson (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark of M.nelson. Indeed probably might be confusing. We must be SURE the image is not copyrighted by somebody to keep it. Per COM:EVID the uploader should show the image can be freely used. --Ellywa (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Originally marked as PD-NASA, which is obviously not the case as it is a work by Boeing and is credited as such; uploader then changed licensed to CC-by-sa-4.0 for unknown reasons. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Reluctantly, but we just don't have a licence for this. Maybe, if a better source was given for it, we might find that Boeing had released it under a usable licence - but so far, we can't show that. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- AFAICS, this was taken at Kennedy, a NASA site, but by John Proferes, who is Boeing staff. We need a better source to keep it. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This source says Credits: NASA/John Proferes. How trustworthily is this? As said above, John Proferes is a Boeing employee, not NASA. --Ras67 (talk) 21:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- AFAICS, this was taken at Kennedy, a NASA site, but by John Proferes, who is Boeing staff. We need a better source to keep it. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
