Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
An IP address left a note saying something, see here, I suspect that that is the former username that this user wants to remain hidden (for whatever reason), while I am not a fan of the whole "vanished user" thing, I don't think that this is what the "vanished" user wants. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- If so, does this fall under "Commons:Outing"? (Apparently a redlink). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep, I was mistaken, such a username was never registered ® and is just Croatian for "really", I will remove this template and close this page as "Withdrawn". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn: Non-admin closure, đón't want to waste anyone's time with this. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. — Racconish 💬 09:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
uploaded request work is deleted Cliffem (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept. No valid reason for deletion. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jose Collazos
[edit]Jose Collazos (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:ASCUN.svg
- File:Huila un paraiso por descubrir logo.svg
- File:Logo de la Gobernación del Huila.svg
- File:Logo Isnos.svg
- File:Puerta del Sol 2 Club House.svg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Startupanambra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused images of non-notable startup group
- File:Chey.jpg
- File:Cross section of some developers.jpg
- File:Mr Pascal okeke during a Session at the Startupanambra Launch Party.jpg
- File:Greetings345.jpg
- File:Onyinyechi Nmecha.jpg
- File:Discussion during the StartupAnambra Event.jpg
- File:Participants of the event.jpg
- File:Group photograph.jpg
- File:Mr Chuka Chukwurah.jpg
- File:Pascal Okeke,.jpg
- File:Members of the StartupAnambra Community.jpg
- File:Startup Anambra Launch Party.jpg
- File:Pascal Okeke - StartupAnambra.jpg
- File:Startup Anambra.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krishna6775 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images of non-contributor, self-promotion only
- File:Businessmen Krishna.jpg
- File:Krishna Yadav uhhh.jpg
- File:Pics Art.jpg
- File:Amzhjkk.jpg
- File:Amar Construction Group.jpg
- File:Krishna Yadav.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rishav2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I'm just going to nominate nearly everything from this user. It's kindof a mess. Most seem to be uploaded as own work, many/most with no meta data. Besides what fairly obviously seems to be screenshots of pornography taken from online, these also include multiple pictures of the same (apparently notable) individual taken over an extended period of time in vastly different settings. That's not definitely damning, but is a pretty common red flag. Some seem to be crops of uploads from other users, with apparently proper licenses, and I've tried to exclude these. Others seem to be crops of an unknown source given their size and dimensions. Some of the older architectural images seem to have some consistency in meta data and may be legitimate, but other architectural images don't follow the same pattern. There's also some audio files that I'm just not really in a place to judge, given that I don't speak the language or read the script.
At the end of the day, it is apparent that some unknown number of these are almost certainly grabbed from online, which begs us to ask for clarification on which is which. Or if none are, and the pattern-following images just happen to be from the same sources that included the original meta data. Not trying to harshly target one user, but once the integrity of the files are seriously called into question, the onus is on the uploader to justify which are legitimate and why we shouldn't toss out the lot as a precautionary measure.
- File:Keiran Lee-Nina Elle creampie.jpg
- File:Keiran Lee creampied Brandi Love.jpg
- File:Baranagar Municipality.jpg
- File:Noapara metro station.jpg
- File:Baranagar Metro station.jpg
- File:Keiran Lee Jessa Rhodes creampie.jpg
- File:Ryan Ryder.jpg
- File:David Perry porn actor.jpg
- File:Jean Val Jean.jpg
- File:Narula Institute of Technology 2021 (2).jpg
- File:Narula Institute of Technology 2021 (1).jpg
- File:Narula Institute of Technology 2021.jpg
- File:Deepak Adhikari 2018.jpg
- File:Jeet Gannguli 2018.jpg
- File:Tanmoy Bhattacharya.jpg
- File:Tathagata Mukherjee.jpg
- File:Abhishek Chatterjee.jpg
- File:Ramon Nomar 2016.jpg
- File:Markus Dupree 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Math.jpg
- File:BRKM Reliefs.jpg
- File:Eric Edwards actor.jpg
- File:Eric Edwards pornstar.jpg
- File:Xander Corvus 2014 AVN.jpg
- File:Xander Corvus 2017.jpg
- File:Jamie Gillis 2003.jpg
- File:Charles Dera 2017.jpg
- File:Danny D 2020.jpg
- File:Small Hands.jpg
- File:Small Hands 2017.jpg
- File:Mick Blue 2020.jpg
- File:Keiran Lee 2017.jpg
- File:BRKM Panoramic.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2k20.webm
- File:Flower decoration at BRKM 3.jpg
- File:Flower decoration at BRKM 2.jpg
- File:Flower decoration at BRKM 1.jpg
- File:Flower decoration at BRKM.jpg
- File:BRKM campus 1.jpg
- File:BRKM annual festival 2020.jpg
- File:BRKMCPS lighting.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 11.jpg
- File:BRKM secondary section 2.jpg
- File:BRKM secondary section.jpg
- File:BRKM secondary section 1.jpg
- File:BRKM Sarada Bhawan 4.jpg
- File:BRKM Sarada Bhawan 1.jpg
- File:BRKM Sarada Bhawan 3.jpg
- File:BRKM Nivedita Bhawan 1.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 10.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 9.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 8.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 7.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 6.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 5.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 4.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 3.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 1.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020.jpg
- File:BRKM Saraswati Puja 2020 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission name sign.jpg
- File:Shiboprosad Mukherjee 2020 1.jpg
- File:BRKM Republic day 2020 1.jpg
- File:BRKM Republic day 2020.jpg
- File:BRKMAHS faculty 2.jpg
- File:BRKM sports.jpg
- File:BRKM students.jpg
- File:BRKM secondary section corridor 2.jpg
- File:BRKM Javeline Throw.webm
- File:Sourav Das.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi 2020 3.jpg
- File:Madan Mitra.jpg
- File:Shiboprosad Mukherjee 2020.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi 2020 1.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi 2020 2.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi 2020.jpg
- File:BRKM National Youth Day 2020 2.jpg
- File:BRKM National Youth Day 2020.jpg
- File:Sourav Ganguly at BRKM.jpg
- File:NiT campus.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi 2k19.jpg
- File:BRKM batches.jpg
- File:Babul Supriyo 2019.jpg
- File:Nandi sir.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi 2019 December.jpg
- File:Anupam Roy 2019.jpg
- File:Riddhi Sen 2020.jpg
- File:Anupam Roy 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Ganges.jpg
- File:BRKMAHS faculty.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi 2019.jpg
- File:CIT School.jpg
- File:Sourav Ganguly at Eden Gardens 2019 1.jpg
- File:Sourav Ganguly at Eden Gardens 2019.jpg
- File:Sourav Ganguly at Eden Gardens 2019 2.jpg
- File:Shiboprosad Mukherjee at BRKM.jpg
- File:Baranagar Kuthi Ghat at night.jpg
- File:Baranagar collage.png
- File:Rupam Islam 2019.jpg
- File:Prosenjit Chatterjee.jpg
- File:BRKM students huddling.jpg
- File:Baranagar Neogi Para Yuvak BrindaJagaddhatri Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Prafulla Chaki Tarun Dal Jagaddhatri Puja 2019 4.jpg
- File:Baranagar Ramakrishna Vivekananda SanghaJagaddhatri Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Prafulla Chaki Tarun Dal Jagaddhatri Puja 2019 3.jpg
- File:Baranagar Samata Apartment Jagaddhatri Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Samata Apartment Jagaddhatri Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Prafulla Chaki Tarun Dal Jagaddhatri Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Prafulla Chaki Tarun Dal Jagaddhatri Puja 2019 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Prafulla Chaki Tarun Dal Jagaddhatri Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Ramakrishna Mission Centenary Primary School, Baranagore.jpg
- File:BRKM campus.jpg
- File:BRKM Swami Vivekananda's statue view from backside.jpg
- File:BRKM Nivedita Krirangan.jpg
- File:Rupankar Bagchi.jpg
- File:Sister Nivedita's statue of BRKM.jpg
- File:Sister Nivedita's statue of BRKM 1.jpg
- File:Swami Vivekananda's statue of BRKM.jpg
- File:BRKMCPS.jpg
- File:BRKM Kali Puja 2019.jpg
- File:BRKM Kali Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:BRKM Kali Puja 2019 2.jpg
- File:BRKM Temple.jpg
- File:BRKM Sarada Bhawan.jpg
- File:Baranagar Kalitala Math Kali Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Yuvak Brinda Kali Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Yuvak Brinda Kali Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Haowa Shokal Kali Puja 2019 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Haowa Shokal Kali Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Haowa Shokal Kali Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Kaushik Ganguly.jpg
- File:Cine-Bahastalab-2012 Proffessor Puroshottam Aggarwal ( Hindi Literature), Swanand Kirkire (Lyricist).crop.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 12.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 10.crop.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2016 6.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2016 5.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2016 4.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2016 3.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2016 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2016.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2016 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2016 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2016.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2017.jpg
- File:Baranagar Karmi Sangha Durga Puja 2018.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2018.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2018 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2018 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2018 3.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2018 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2018.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2018 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2018.jpg
- File:IMG Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2018 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2019 6.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2019 5.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2019 3.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2019 4.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2019 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Mallick Colony Durga Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 11.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 8.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 10.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 9.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 7.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 6.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 3.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 5.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 4.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Netaji Colony Lowland Durga Puja 2019 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019 7.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019 6.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019 5.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019 4.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019 3.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019 2.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019 1.jpg
- File:Baranagar Bandhudal Sporting Club Durga Puja 2019.jpg
- File:Tapas Paul.jpg
- File:BRKM Sharodothsob 2019.webm
- File:Shiboprosad Mukherjee 2019.jpg
- File:Arjun Chakraborty.jpg
- File:Picture of trio from the motion poster launch event of Durgeshgorer Guptodhon.crop.jpg
- File:About Chatterjee 2019.jpg
- File:125th Anniversary of Swami Vivekananda's Chicago Addresses, at Baranagar Mission.jpg
- File:BRKM Nivedita Bhawan name plate.jpg
- File:Salman Khan pronunciation (Hindi).ogg
- File:Bn-অভিষেক চ্যাটার্জী.ogg
- File:Bn-জিৎ গাঙ্গুলী.ogg
- File:Bn-তথাগত মুখার্জি.ogg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Swanand_Kirkire_(Lyricist).crop.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
GMGtalk 10:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete all. Most of them falls within COM:PARTYPICS. A majority of them are COM:CV and rest are subject to COM:NOTUSED Run n Fly (talk) 11:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete 100%, including those uploaded by this uploader not listed here. COM:PCP applies. These uploads bring the project into disrepute. It cannot have been done by accident, and Commons has so many languages available that we have to assume iyt was an informed misdemeanour to upload and claim as own work. Timtrent (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above, there is too much doubt that the photographs are not the uploader's own work and therefore should be deleted under COM:PCP. Bidgee (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per nomination, Timtrent, Bidgee and Run n Fly. Second in motion to the users' inputs above. Assorted not own works, probable copyvios (taken either from the net or elsewhere, or maybe photos from the uploader's acquaintances, COM:PCP may apply). Several may also lean to out of COM:SCOPE and COM:NOTUSED (questionable usability). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above. —Locke Cole • t • c 17:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and consensus (other contributions need to be nominated for deletion). — Racconish 💬 09:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rishav2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rishav2014 applies. These pictures are unlikely to be copyright of the uploader
- File:Kenzie Taylor and date at Inked Awards 2016 (31837077541).crop.jpg
- File:Vouyer and Aguchi.crop.jpg
- File:Rocco Siffredi and Rocco Tanica - Lucca Comics & Games 2016 03.crop.jpg
- File:Rocco Siffredi and Rocco Tanica - Lucca Comics & Games 2016 02.crop.jpg
- File:Rocco Siffredi and Rocco Tanica - Lucca Comics & Games 2016 01.crop.jpg
- File:Rocco Siffredi and Misha Cross at the 2019 Xbiz Europa Awards.crop.jpg
- File:James Bonn 1999 AVN Awards.crop.jpg
- File:Tony Montana, Buck Adams at 2005 AEE Thursday.crop.jpg
- File:Monique DeMoan 1999.crop.jpg
- File:Gia Paloma, Tommy Pistol at party 2.crop.jpg
- File:Nina Hartley, Dale DaBone 01062028.crop.jpg
- File:Unk, unk, Joel Lawrence at PSK 20070925 1.crop.jpg
.crop.jpg){kind=link}
Timtrent (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: Unless I made a mistake, these were excluded originally because they were cropped versions of uploads by other users. GMGtalk 16:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo While I am sure you are correct, and I acknowledge the huge amount of work you did to check, I felt these were worthy of community discussion. I nominated them because I am genuinely unsure what their fate shoudl be, in the knowledge that the community knows far better than I do. Timtrent (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: Of course no one is obligated to do anything. It's a volunteer project. But if we do want to do something, then we kindof need to make a good faith effort to be sure it's right. Otherwise we're kindof just handing a bundle to someone else and asking them to do it for us. Sometimes that's appropriate. Like you and I are responsible for our own uploads, because others don't necessarily have access to the relevant information. Sometimes it's not, like if we just nominate a bunch of stuff with the expectation that someone else will sort through whether the nomination has any merit.
- @GreenMeansGo While I am sure you are correct, and I acknowledge the huge amount of work you did to check, I felt these were worthy of community discussion. I nominated them because I am genuinely unsure what their fate shoudl be, in the knowledge that the community knows far better than I do. Timtrent (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Sometimes "I'd like for someone to please figure this out" is appropriate for DR, especially when it concerns a language you don't speak or a script you don't read. Other times that may be more appropriate to COM:VPC or COM:HD. GMGtalk 22:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo Thank you for the extra information.. You have probably worked out that I am by no means a Commons veteran. I arrive here via en WP's Articles for Creation area where I review drafts. Many contain pictures which are copyright problems. Once here I take a look at the uploader's other work.
- Since I'm certain that you have far more skill and expertise here than I do, is it your opinion that I should withdraw this nomination? I will take your advice on board with pleasure. Timtrent (talk) 06:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Sometimes "I'd like for someone to please figure this out" is appropriate for DR, especially when it concerns a language you don't speak or a script you don't read. Other times that may be more appropriate to COM:VPC or COM:HD. GMGtalk 22:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: I'm hardly the sharpest crayon in the shed, and I appreciate your willingness to learn and help out. Commons can be daunting to many Wikipedia natives. But when you're trying to attack a crop, you kindof have to attack the original. A crop is a derivative work of the original, and dependent on that original copyright status. So either the original is bad and we need to delete both, or the original is good and we need to delete neither. GMGtalk 11:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo This is definitely extra information regardkng cropped files and leaves me thinking 51:49 that I ought to withdraw the nomination. Were you not an admin I would leave it at that. However, I recognise that to be an admin here requires substantially more experience than you suggest you have. This is not a time for your modesty! (and yes, I am aware of the janitorial role, but one requires a skillset to wield a mop and bucket). Being unsure of the protocols, may I state simply that I WITHDRAW THiS NOMINATION? I base that on your advice. Timtrent (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: Yes, a nominator can voluntarily withdraw a request so long as it's uncontroversial. The relevant guidance is a little poorly worded. It says that no one else has contributed, but in practice it generally requires that no one else has !voted to delete. GMGtalk 12:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- For the avoidance of doubt, as nominator, I withdraw this nomination. There have been comments, but no opinions expressed in any formal manner in either direction. Thank you @GreenMeansGo for your advice and patience Timtrent (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: I'm hardly the sharpest crayon in the shed, and I appreciate your willingness to learn and help out. Commons can be daunting to many Wikipedia natives. But when you're trying to attack a crop, you kindof have to attack the original. A crop is a derivative work of the original, and dependent on that original copyright status. So either the original is bad and we need to delete both, or the original is good and we need to delete neither. GMGtalk 11:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator withdraws the nomination after discussion. --GMGtalk 12:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope and purpose material. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use on user page. — Racconish 💬 09:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism, created by LTA and socks user HitomiAkane (talk) 02:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Only used on userpage of user with zero meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal image. IceWelder [✉] 21:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
This periodical not only had a copyright notice, but it renewed its contributions per this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: ah, thank you. I could not find the notice anywhere inside of the paper - is that website a comprehensive database? (feel free to delete, of course, keeping this up for seven days is unnecessary) Elli (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I am the author and I have changed my mind about it being on here . Autman666 (talk) 23:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I am the author and poster of this image and i no longer want it posted here I want it taken down. Autman666 (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Not own work owned by Grupo Imagen ItsJustdancefan (talk) 03:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep clearly doesn't meet the threshold of originality. If the ownership information is wrong, just change it. That said, it was uploaded by a single purpose account. So it's pretty likely it is someone from the company that uploaded it and therefore it would be their own work. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copy of file:Logo Grupo Imagen Multimedia.2016.png. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I had a mistake uploading what I did not make. Hateghltk (talk) 03:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
inaccurate 78Game (talk) 10:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dwi arinto (talk · contribs)
[edit]exif show author is doowee, seems not uploader's own work.
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep that's no reason. doowee may be another spelling of Dwi arinto, the uploader's name (anyway a nickname).--ProfessorX (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @ProfessorX: The reason for your keep is based on the premise that he/she is indeed the author, but what we need to discuss now is whether the image is his/her work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Yes I know. There is no evidence that he/she is not the author. Look at his other uploads from the same day and their exif information. People can write any names they want into these exif information. They can even use other people's cameras and are still the author and copyright holder.--ProfessorX (talk) 15:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @ProfessorX: There is no evidence that he/she is not the author. Did you know COM:PCP? (｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Now there is evidence. Dwi Arinto uploaded 3 more images, claiming in EXIF to be both Doowee and Dwi Arinto. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): per Taivo. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 08:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Los Desertores .jpg Losdesertores (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake La Nave Partirà (talk) 06:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake La Nave Partirà (talk) 06:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kennelijke auteursrechtenschending Eric de Muziekbibliothecaris (talk) 06:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kennelijke auteursrechtenschending Eric de Muziekbibliothecaris (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal link to Facebook George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused corrupted / heavy photoshoped image George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, very bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Collages need source and license for every used image, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Franchiceddhu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused and unusable dark
George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subhajit Bhattacharaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images of non-contributor
George Chernilevsky talk 08:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright Holder regarding meta info in file: info@bode-fotografie.com. „Author“ regarding summary: Grossmann Group. Also, a company cannot be the photographer. Obvious mislicensing. KlausHeide (talk) 08:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright holder regarding meta info in file: info@bode-fotografie.com. „Author“ regarding summary: Grossmann Group. Also, a company cannot be the photographer. Obvious mislicensing. KlausHeide (talk) 08:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright holder regarding meta info in file: info@bode-fotografie.com. „Author“ regarding summary: Grossmann Group. Also, a company cannot be the photographer. Obvious mislicensing. KlausHeide (talk) 08:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Appinei2004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal and promotional images
- File:Isha2.jpg
- File:Tap remix.jpg
- File:T.A.P..jpg
- File:Apinaya Isha.jpg
- File:Rishok.jpg
- File:Apinaya Suthaharan.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation is likely as well. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright uncertain KurdeEzidi (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, "© Pascal Maguesyan" in description. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright uncertain KurdeEzidi (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright uncertain KurdeEzidi (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 09:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabipazleivafran3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images
George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photos without metadata, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright uncertain KurdeEzidi (talk) 09:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright uncertain KurdeEzidi (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Sunbury Cemetery Gate.jpg JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 20:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Big text on photo spoils any educational use. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, if the text is useful, then it should be written directly into some project. This is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images
George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, in addition small photos without metadata, copyright violation is likely as well. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
So much margin makes the text illegible at standard sizes or makes a mess of layout if enlarged to be legible. Should be wikitext/TeX anyway. DMacks (talk) 10:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, we have file:Elementuen eskema.jpg. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
This logo is not official, Yahoo no longer has a seperate logo for their search operations. 78Game (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept, this is not a reason to delete the file, because it is used (and even in multiple projects). Commons hosts old and outdated logos to show history. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
This image is copyrighted and I did not have permission to post it at the time Lyanbox782 (talk) 04:51, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Seems {{PD-textlogo}} to me. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope promo image of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, album covers can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplikat. Unscharf. Besser ist jetzt Logo hammeskrause architekten neu.svg Einfach machen Hamburg (talk) 10:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, smaller duplicate. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 10:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright Infringement 78Game (talk) 10:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept, it's not. The logo does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
May have copyright issue TNSE Mahalingam VNR (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for deletion). Taivo (talk) 09:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Is a duplicate of File:20 Minutes logo.svg (uploaded later): the user uploaded it without knowing that a vector version existed. — Baidax 💬 10:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
May have copyright isssue. TNSE Mahalingam VNR (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the image for deletion). Taivo (talk) 09:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope, test diagram images
George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, educational value is not shown. Uploader confessed, that the files wore created for some schoolwork. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amar Salimas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images
George Chernilevsky talk 10:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photos without metadata, copyright violation is likely as well. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name DiAuras (talk) 11:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, this was bad reason for deletion, because we can always change filenames and categories, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
wrong name DiAuras (talk) 11:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this was bad reason for deletion, because we can always change filenames and descriptions, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Chemical structure diagram as a pdf file, unusable, has File:4-Chlor-2-nitrophenol.svg as a replacement. Wostr (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Incorrect file format, large margins; superseded with a newer version by same uploader. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:09, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Music by Giovanni Paisiello, CD burned by actor Jonathan Pryce in 2006 for poet Danya Polykov, name of the composer handwritten by Mr. Pryce.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope of the project, no educational use. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; see also w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Molana Ijaz.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Related (according to SPI) requests: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Molana sabir shah orakzai.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anwar Shah Orakzai.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by OrakzaiHaqqani. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; see also w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Molana Ijaz. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Related (according to SPI) requests: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by علمی مجلس, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anwar Shah Orakzai.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by OrakzaiHaqqani. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; see also w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Molana Ijaz. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Related (according to SPI) requests: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by علمی مجلس, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Molana sabir shah orakzai.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by OrakzaiHaqqani. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio (remark: used on different web pages like twitter and reporter-ohne-grenzen.de). --Wdwd (talk) 19:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OrakzaiHaqqani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE; see also w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Molana Ijaz.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Related (according to SPI) requests: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by علمی مجلس, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Molana sabir shah orakzai.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anwar Shah Orakzai.jpg. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal logo. IceWelder [✉] 10:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- There exists en:Rockstar Games. But logo of company consists letter R, here is P. Is the logo correct? Real source is needed. Do we have better version? Taivo (talk) 08:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: This is not a real logo and does not belong to any company. IceWelder [✉] 08:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
advertising selfie used only at a self-promotional wikidata entry - the latter should be deleted, too, or moved to Facebook Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, lack of educational use. Solomon203 (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jaslyn Goh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
wrong upload Erkanemin (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Some poem in hindi. Out of the scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Implausible conformation (no minimization of energy), low quality. Leyo 19:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Central carbon is geometric nonsense, let alone global conformational problems. Also this is a graphical composite of uncited originals--license fail. DMacks (talk) 22:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Courvoisier spouses
[edit]- File:Amy Bakaloff Courvoisier 1958.jpg
- File:Ernest Hemingway et Amy Bakaloff Courvoisier en 1954.jpg
- File:Le peintre Wifredo Lam et Amy Bakaloff Courvoisier en 1957.jpg
- File:Wifredo Lam et Amy B. Courvoisier à Canaïma avril 1957.jpg
- File:Portrait Ruth Bessoudo Courvoisier 1959.jpg
- File:Ruth Bessoudo Courvoisier et Jacques Prévert St Paul de Vence 1953.jpg
Photographs of the 1950-ies from the family archive, authors are unknown. Some of them might be uploaded to local wikis as Fair Use but current licenses are definitely wrong. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardooooo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused trivial logos
George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. I tried to search them from Wikipedias, but I did not found any of them. I did not know, that there was 20 parties and coalitions named Frente Nacional! Taivo (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asanka Buwaneka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope personal images of non-contributor
George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete both. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jehielwilliams7000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these are own work as claimed. Some have FB MD, most have no exif and can be found on the web. PCP
- File:The Victoria and Alfred Waterfront.jpg
- File:Cape Town City at Night.jpg
- File:Cape Town City, Table Mountain.jpg
- File:Cape Town City, The BMW Pavilion.jpg
- File:The V&A Waterfront, Cape Town.jpg
- File:Cape Town City, construction progress on 35 Lower Long.jpg
- File:Cape Town City, proposal.jpg
- File:A 3D rendering of 16 on Bree next to the Portside Tower.jpg
- File:Cape Town City, The Standard Bank Towers.jpg
- File:V&A Waterfront, Battery Park.png
- File:The Rubik, Cape Town City.jpg
- File:Green Economy, Cape Town City.png
- File:Cape Town City, Economic growth.jpg
- File:Sandton City, Johannesburg, South Africa.jpg
- File:Sandton, Johannesburg South Africa.jpg
- File:Table Mountain, Cape Town skyline.jpg
- File:The V&A Waterfront, Cape Town City.jpg
- File:Cape Town City, The Modern.jpg
- File:Cape Town Central business district.jpg
- File:Johannesburg skyscrapers.jpg
- File:V&A Waterfront, Cape Town City.jpg
- File:Skyscrapers in Cape Town City.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
At least some of these covers are published books (eg. https://knihobot.cz/kniha/454289-jidis-pro-radost-2013). Would be unusual for all of these publishers to commission distinctive cover art but not bother to get exclusive rights to it, allowing the artist to release it all online as high-res CC-Attribution for anyone to reuse, especially not in the format of the actual book covers as they were printed. (A TinEye search that shows the Sayers cover has already been reused on a cheap ebook cover - since deleted - of Ibsen's Doll's House.)
- File:Eugene ivanov 0055.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0063.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0064.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0086.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0095.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0097.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0100.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0103.jpg
- File:Eugene ivanov 0104.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 0036.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 0071.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 0088.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 0089.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 0090.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 01.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 03.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 04.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 06.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 07.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 08.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 09.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 10.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 11.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 12.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 13.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 15.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 16.jpg
- File:Ilustrace Eugene Ivanov 17.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 13:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish 💬 12:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zerolandteam385 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images are copyvios for the following reason:
- File:Delivery-side.jpg - Taken from internet [1]
- File:Faw sirius s80 panel van 5.jpg - Taken from internet [2]
- File:5bd304ced816552c0a7742bestepvanfordva.jpg - See Commons:Deletion requests/File:5bd304ced816552c0a7742bestepvanfordva.jpg
- File:Chevystepvanzerolandteam385va.jpg - Taken from internet [3]
- File:Chevrolet Step van 1961.jpg - Taken from internet [4]
- File:1941CHEVROLESTEPVAN.jpg - Taken from internet [5]
- File:Manvw3.jpg - Taken from internet [6]
–Davey2010Talk 17:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dineshs01102000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete and block user See the talk page full of copyright warnings and still the user does not understand. 2409:4072:16:931:F046:577C:1558:1CC0 18:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and blocked User:Dineshs01102000. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 14:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Not an videos only an image Preetykaur761 (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Dharmadhyaksha at 14:02, 28 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files of Notrchad
[edit]Notrchad (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Circle in Moundou.jpg
- File:Centre culturel ndjamena.jpg
- File:Grand mosque.JPG (1978 building)
- File:President residence.jpg
First group. There is no freedom of panorama in Chad and the photos violate sculptors' copyright.
- File:Abeche rout.jpg (504×460)
- File:Chado cam.jpg (450×302)
- File:Cultural dance.jpg (650×487)
- File:Mao chad.jpg (600×400)
- File:Tibesti , Nord Chad.jpg (604×407, watermark in another language)
Second group. Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope personal image of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unusable poor quality, blurred George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DesignImpactAwardsTeam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused non-notable logo or diagram images
George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal and promotional image George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Files of Wikipedian1997.
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Wikipedian1997. (talk · contribs)
- File:Arar Bangla.jpg (1024×683)
- File:Arar bangla.jpg (4032×3024, camera Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max)
- File:Arar "Dera".jpg (1125×602)
- File:Farooka.jpg (576×960)
- File:Gate of Sahiwal.jpg (1080×1085)
- File:Jamia Masjid Arar Shareef.jpg (4032×3024)
- File:Old Masjid of Sahiwal.jpg (720×960)
- File:Polo pony.jpg (1024×716)
- File:Rai Haji Khuda Baksh Dhudy, son of Nawab Rai Haji Muhammad Baig Dhudy.jpg (2077×2839, old photo)
- File:Rai Haq Nawaz Dhudy, after a Polo match with Nawaz Sharif, former Prime Minister of Pakistan.jpg (1024×768)
- File:Sahiwal Mandir.jpg (1125×605)
- File:SW sugar mills.jpg (1125×741)
Mostly small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Files of O4kareg
[edit]O4kareg (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Вид на братскую могилу и мемориал.jpg
- File:Вид на скульптуру ночью.jpg
- File:Ворота шлюза, вид с моста.jpg
- File:Вход в шлюз со стороны реки.jpg
- File:Декоративные элементы и лозунг.jpg
- File:Декоративные элементы на верхней части ворот.jpg
- File:Декоративные элементы над входом.jpg
- File:Декоративные элементы шлюзовых ворот со стороны канала.jpg
- File:Левая при входе стена, вид ночью.jpg
- File:Общий вид ворот со стороны набережной.jpg
- File:Общий вид ворот со стороны реки.jpg
- File:Общий вид шлюза с моста.jpg
- File:Памятник М. Паникахе, вид сбоку.jpg
- File:Памятник М. Паникахе, общий вид.jpg
- File:Памятник с мемориальной доской.jpg
- File:Правая стена. начало.jpg
- File:Правая стена, общий вид.jpg
- File:Элементы декора ворот со стороны реки.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and the photos violate sculptors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée le 21 JUIN 2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 08:24, 29 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 20 June 2021 --Krdbot 20:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 07:46, 29 June 2021 UTC: No license since 2021-06-20. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about COM:CB#Internet_images --Krdbot 20:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 07:46, 29 June 2021 UTC: No license since 2021-06-20. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about COM:CB#Internet_images --Krdbot 20:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 07:46, 29 June 2021 UTC: No license since 2021-06-20. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about COM:CB#Internet_images --Krdbot 20:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Files of R136a1 Star
[edit]R136a1 Star (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:CM Recto CdeO.jpg
- File:Limketkai Mall NC.jpg
- File:Limketkai Mall east.jpg
- File:Misamis Or. Statue.jpg
- File:Paseo del rio.jpg
- File:Pearlmont Hotel CdeO.jpg
- File:Provincial capitol of Misamis Or..jpg
- File:Riviera Hotel, Paseo del Rio.jpg
- File:Velez street CdO.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Philippines and the photos violate architects' copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Files of Heme1218
[edit]ˇ Here are last remaining contributions of Heme1218 (talk · contribs):
- File:Deborando a la serpiente.jpg (392×697)
- File:Destruccion patrimonial.jpg (523×697)
- File:Hay para todos.jpg (523×697)
- File:Hecho a mano.jpg (1006×566)
- File:Pinto lo que vivo.jpg (929×697)
- File:Regreso de la sombra.jpg (929×697)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Files of IAPSS
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of IAPSS - Conflict Security and Crime Research Committee (talk · contribs):
- File:Antoine Andary an ECS alumnus to Vice-Chair the IAPSS’s Research Committee.jpg
- File:IAPSS Antoine Andary Discourse - General Assembly, Rome, Italy.jpg
- File:IAPSS Antoine Andary Meeting.jpg
- File:IAPSS World Congress, Antoine Andary Presentation.jpg
Out of project scope. en:Antoine Andary was thrice deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal promo image George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images of non-contributor
George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gerade9405 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images
George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal drawing George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prabharirajasthan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images / documents
George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal drawing George Chernilevsky talk 08:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ginger ela (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal / promo images
George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alamspadron (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images
George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valentinecharb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal and promo images
George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images
George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images of non-notable singer (21 followers only in Instagram) George Chernilevsky talk 10:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
probably copyviolation, see statement at Category:Emil Kiess. I told the uploader at de:User Talk:HeinzDS. Bahnwerker (talk) 10:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- In addition, metadata credit Heinz Bunse as the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- At de:User Talk:HeinzDS, the uploader confirms that he is Heinz Bunse, but that the artist Emil Kiess is not willing to publish it under a license that allows commercial use, but only "for wikipedia". Therefore, this image must be deleted. --Bahnwerker (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Ich bin der fotograf dieses Repros. Dr Künstler Emil Kiess hat das Repro bei mir in Auftrag gegeben und zugestimmt, das das Buld i. dem WiKipedia Artikel veröffentlicht wird. Leider gibt der Wikipedia Artikel kein aussagekräftiges Bild vom Werk des Künstlers Emil Kiess ab. Das SW Foto von dem Kasseler Glasbild szeigt nur das gebäude, nicht aber dqs farbenprächtige Glasbild. Ich habe im auftrag des Kpnstlers Reproduktionen seiner Gemälde gefertigt und würde gern zwei oder drei typische Gemälde in den Artikel einfügen. Die Urheberrechte werden nicht verletzt, da der Künstler zustimmt. Wie ist der richtige Weg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeinzDS (talk • contribs) 13:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 10:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal drawing George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. I suspect this is a sock of the blocked Powerstar2020 as all of these images are for articles they created on EN. Ravensfire (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
This file is under Mojang's EULA. However, It's not compatible with CC BY-SA 2.0 because the EULA doesn't allow for freely-commerical use. Semi-Brace (talk) 17:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ragesoss at 22:58, 1 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree game screenshot --Krdbot 02:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Files of Varapuzha Former Cathedral
[edit]Here are all contributions of Varapuzha Former Cathedral (talk · contribs):
- File:Ancient Statue of BVM.png (1920×1080)
- File:Droanahalli- Oct 2019.jpg (825×960)
- File:Harihar-Oct 2019.jpg (2048×1365)
- File:Karumathampatti-- Oct 2019.jpg (2048×1365, Facebook file)
- File:Renovated Basilica.jpg (4032×1816, camera Samsung SM-A705FN)
Only one photo has camera data, one is taken from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Editor is blocked on enwiki for promotional username and promotional edits. Elizium23 (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:06, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 1925 photo without further indications. Should be PD-old-assumed. Ruthven (msg) 06:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: it is not a valid reason for deletion. however it's a scan of a 1929 book without permission. Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Probably not an own work (the portrayed person died in 1990). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map, TylerKutschbach (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map so there's no need to have this anymore TylerKutschbach (talk) 02:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept. But the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map with a clearer picture so there's no need to have the png file anymore. TylerKutschbach (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep As with the prior, identically-worded deletion requests, the file is still in use.--Ibagli (Talk) 13:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 15:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
A map for this election already exists which is an SVG. Let's try not to upload .png or .jpeg images of elections like this. This map is also factually incorrect Mr.Election (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 03:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Riverside County is not right on this map. TylerKutschbach (talk) 02:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. We have file:CA2012Pres.svg. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
License is not relevant Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - very likely a German photo, and while published in the US before 1916, we don't know the German copyright. It should be kept on en.wiki until someone can determine its status in Germany. Parsecboy (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept, as much as I know, source country of the photo is where it was first published. First publication seems to be in USA, so German copyright is not relevant. If you have evidence, that the photo was published in Germany (or anywhere outside USA) before 1916, then please present it and the photo can be deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright belongs with the stamp creator, not the uploader. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - India postage stamps are licensed under {{GODL-India}} --Sreejith K (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per COM:India, Indian stamps are free. But the file has no source at all. If you can give a source, then please create an undeletion request. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:FOP Israel: The signs were not situated permanently in a public place in Israel. Dgw (talk) 23:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The picture includes signs as part of the public space. The picture include the square that is central in the Givat Nesher neighborhood in the city Nesher, and also the synagogue of the neighborhood. The picture also shows a sign that I personally drafted, wrote and made and the copyright on this sign is mine. There is no justification for deleting this image. Hanay (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This photo is of interest to the history of Israel and has no copyright issues. There is no reason to delete it. - La Nave Partirà (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The election sign contain simple text: The name of the candidat and party name. Ineligible for copyright. The text and the font. If there are any copyrightable parts they are small and definitely de minimis. -- Geagea (talk) 09:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I Agree with Hanay, La Nave Partirà and Geagea's arguments. BAswim (talk) 07:24, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per above. -- Geagea (talk) 08:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
License is not relevant Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept, then I give a better license. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License is not relevant Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept, the license is relevant, but to make you happier, I'll add another one. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
License is not relevant Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - I've updated the license as I'm pretty sure {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} applies here. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept, given that this is 1893/4 photo, I do not want to delete the it. I see no evidence, that this is US photo. I give another, more relevant license. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
The author of Chinese calligraphy is en:Feng Tang, living shizhao (talk) 03:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
probably copyviolation, see statement at Category:Emil Kiess. I told the uploader at de:User Talk:HeinzDS. Bahnwerker (talk) 10:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Das Porträt foto sollte gezeigt werden, da der Aufenthalt in Rom ein wichtiger Lebensabschnitt des Künstlers Emil Kiess ist. Den Origi al Abzug hat mir Emil Kiess zur Verfügung gestellt. Das Repro habe ich gefertigt.
- Leider zeigt die Seite keine für Emil Kiess typischen Gemälde. Ich habe Reproduktionen| Fotografien von vielen Gemälden im Auftrag von Emil Kiess gefertigt und würde gern zwei oder drei typische Gemälde auf der Wiki Seite ergänzen, Falls das aber nicht gewünscht ist, geben sie mit bitte Bescheid . — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 5.83.191.228 (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Es geht nicht nur darum, was „gewünscht“ ist. Das Problem ist das geltende Urheberrecht. Wir bräuchen eine Feststellung, wer der Fotograf ist, und eine Genehmigung dieses Urhebers, dass das Bild für jegliche kommerziellen Zwecke genutzt werden kann, die dann per Mail geschickt werden muss, siehe Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber). --Bahnwerker (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- At de:User Talk:HeinzDS, the uploader confirms that he is not the author and has not been in contact with the actual photograph. Therefore, this image must be deleted. --Bahnwerker (talk) 20:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Es geht nicht nur darum, was „gewünscht“ ist. Das Problem ist das geltende Urheberrecht. Wir bräuchen eine Feststellung, wer der Fotograf ist, und eine Genehmigung dieses Urhebers, dass das Bild für jegliche kommerziellen Zwecke genutzt werden kann, die dann per Mail geschickt werden muss, siehe Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber). --Bahnwerker (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, by Storkk on 28th of June with reason "Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS." Taivo (talk) 11:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Also:
Derivative work of a potentially-copyrighted map. No FOP exception in the country of origin for commercial exploitations of such types of artistic or graphic works in publicly-accessible spaces, outdoors or indoors.JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Language template previously used at COM:FMR, no longer required. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:59, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Missvain as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photograph of a photograph that is NOT in the public domain as it was likely published in the 20th-century and the photographer could be alive for all we know. Without OTRS from Beringer we shouldn't keep this on Commmons. A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - Now that I look closer this photograph was taken in the 1950s - his clothing and hair make that evident He also retired in the 1950s. While it is highly unlikely the photographer is alive, we can't assume that this image is public domain. It is likely under the copyright of Treasury Wine Estates. I don't like making assumptions about possibly copyrighted images, so, when I'm questioning something, I'd rather delete it, then risk keeping it on Commons. Missvain (talk) 14:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Plus also:
Derivative work of a tarpaulin that may look from the government at first but likely created by third-party private graphics designers, like most municipal paraphernalia here. See also COM:COMM Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Language template previously used at Commons:Media help, no longer required. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
This clearly is the derivative work from the copyrghted w:Kukryniksy caricature published in w:Krokodil magazine (issue 3,1953). The last member of Kukryniksy group died in 2000. IgorMagic (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, will be restored in 2075 (74+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Provided permission doesn't imply re-using outside of wiki, making derivatoves and a possible commercial use, therefore is not valid, and certainly not PD. Masur (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- I don't remember where I found that file in 2006, so: change the licence type or delete the file ;) --katpatuka (talk) 08:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Wikipedia-only licenses are prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Selbst hochgeladen, ich habe es ersetzt, es ist überflüssig geworden. Geo-Science-International (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Geo-Science-International: Please provide link to the replacement file. Otherwise we can't delete this one. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Es gibt eine neue bessere Grafik. Bitte die alte löschen. Geo-Science-International (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The new one: file:Uniformitätsregel - dominant-rezessive Vererbung.png.
Kept: we can keep both. Ruthven (msg) 08:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I made a better graphic of this inheritance pattern. This one is redundant now. Sciencia58 (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no new arguments provided. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Bitte löscht doch endlich diese schlechte JPG-Grafik aus meinen Anfängerzeiten. Ich habe sie schon lange mit einem sauberen PNG ersetzt.
Ich hatte am Anfang einen anderen Account, habe aufhört ihn zu benutzen, einen neuen eingerichtet, den jetzigen. Ich habe nie beide benutzt. Der alte ist gesperrt worden. Der Admin, der das sinnvollerweise getan hat, glaubte zwar, es läge ein Missbrauch vor, das stimmte aber nicht, weil ich den alten nicht mehr benutzt hatte. Ich habe mal geschrieben, dass er den Eintrag mit dem Missbrauch entfernen soll, das ist aber nicht geschehen. Es spielt jetzt keine Rolle. Ich beantrage als ursprüngliche Hochladerin, dass die schlechten Grafiken mit den scheußlichen JPG-Streupixeln endlich gelöscht werden.
Please delete this bad JPG graphic from my beginner days. I replaced it with a clean PNG a long time ago.
I had another account at the beginning, stopped using it, set up a new one, the current one. I never used both of them. The old one has been banned. The admin who sensibly did it thought there was abuse, but that wasn't true because I had stopped using the old one. I once wrote that he should remove the entry with the abuse, but that didn't happen. It doesn't matter now. As the original uploader, I request that the bad graphics with the hideous JPG scatter pixels finally be deleted. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. There exists now file:Dominant-recessive inheritance - pea flowers F1 - F2.png.Taivo (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Selbst hochgeladen, ich habe es ersetzt, es ist überflüssig geworden. Geo-Science-International (talk) 04:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Geo-Science-International: Please provide link to the replacement file. Otherwise we can't delete this one. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Es gibt eine neue bessere Grafik. Bitte die alte löschen. Geo-Science-International (talk) 20:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The new one is file:Uniformitätsregel - intermediäre Vererbung.png.
Kept: we can keep both. Ruthven (msg) 08:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I made a better graphic of this pattern. This one is redundant now. Sciencia58 (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no new arguments provided. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Bitte löscht doch endlich diese schlechte JPG-Grafik mit ihren Streupixeln. Ich habe sie schon lange mit einem sauberen PNG ersetzt: file:Uniformitätsregel - intermediäre Vererbung.png.
Ich hatte am Anfang einen anderen Account, habe aufhört ihn zu benutzen, einen neuen eingerichtet, den jetzigen. Ich habe nie beide benutzt. Der alte ist gesperrt worden. Der Admin, der das sinnvollerweise getan hat, glaubte zwar, es läge ein Missbrauch vor, das stimmte aber nicht, weil ich den alten nicht mehr benutzt hatte. Ich habe mal geschrieben, dass er den Eintrag mit dem Missbrauch entfernen soll, das ist aber nicht geschehen. Es spielt jetzt keine Rolle. Ich beantrage als ursprüngliche Hochladerin, dass die schlechten Grafiken mit den scheußlichen JPG-Streupixeln endlich gelöscht werden.
Please delete this bad JPG graphic from my beginner days. I replaced it with a clean PNG a long time ago.
I had another account at the beginning, stopped using it, set up a new one, the current one. I never used both of them. The old one has been banned. The admin who sensibly did it thought there was abuse, but that wasn't true because I had stopped using the old one. I once wrote that he should remove the entry with the abuse, but that didn't happen. It doesn't matter now. As the original uploader, I request that the bad graphics with the hideous JPG scatter pixels finally be deleted. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 07:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 07:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 07:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 07:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 07:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nischal_Narayanam#Self_Declaration which has an unanswered question since March 2021, presumably regarding this picture. Timtrent (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)- Comment As you know the edited picture don't show camera details as the picture is cropped from the group picture that i clicked by myself from one of an education event. I have no personal connection or any other person who have connection with the said person so don't have fresh picture of them or permission to use other picture. --Plotterof (talk) 09:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused and unusable quality George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I did not found the Marshmallow Weekly journal from en.wiki, probably the cover is out of scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Video no longer available so unable to verify source/license Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo license not confirmed. Confirmation is required that the photo was published anonymously or that the author died before 1947 for the photo to be recognized in the public domain in the Russian Federation. Kursant504 (talk) 09:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo license not confirmed. Confirmation is required that the photo was published anonymously or that the author died before 1947 for the photo to be recognized in the public domain in the Russian Federation. Forum reibert is not a source. Kursant504 (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Invalid license. This is not a historical, but a modern photo. The item is antique, but someone unknown took this photo recently. He owns the copyright for it. Kursant504 (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo license not confirmed. Confirmation is required that the photo was published anonymously or that the author died before 1947 for the photo to be recognized in the public domain in the Russian Federation. Kursant504 (talk) 10:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo license not confirmed. Confirmation is required that the photo was published anonymously or that the author died before 1947 for the photo to be recognized in the public domain in the Russian Federation. Kursant504 (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo license not confirmed. Confirmation is required that the photo was published anonymously or that the author died before 1947 for the photo to be recognized in the public domain in the Russian Federation. Kursant504 (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo license not confirmed. Confirmation is required that the photo was published anonymously or that the author died before 1947 for the photo to be recognized in the public domain in the Russian Federation. Kursant504 (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo license not confirmed. Confirmation is required that the photo was published anonymously or that the author died before 1947 for the photo to be recognized in the public domain in the Russian Federation. Kursant504 (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Invalid license. The photo is not in the public domain of the Russian Federation, as it was clearly taken by a man from the German army. Kursant504 (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Invalid license. The photo is not in the public domain of the Russian Federation, most likely it is a personal photo of a person who identified himself as the author. Kursant504 (talk) 10:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused modern photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality version of logo already on Commons. IceWelder [✉] 10:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I did not find a replacement file, so "logo already in Commons" is dubious. Still I delete it, because the file has no acceptable source and we cannot be sure, that the logo is correct. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
May have copyright issue TNSE Mahalingam VNR (talk) 10:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted Artwork 78Game (talk) 10:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per COM:PACKAGING. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
May have copyright issue TNSE Mahalingam VNR (talk) 10:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, in addition, educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
May have copyright issue TNSE Mahalingam VNR (talk) 10:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio: https://www.bonnierbookery.se/forfattare/39232/moa-eriksson-sandberg/ Tournesol (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:22, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio:https://www.bonnierbookery.se/forfattare/39232/moa-eriksson-sandberg/ Tournesol (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
According to French Wikipedia, this building has been designed by Robert Camelot (1903-1992), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and, as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be freely shared before 1st January 2063. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons. Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also crop file:Reims Église Saint-Vincent de Paul (cropped).jpg due to same reason. The files will be restored after copyright expiration in 2063. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
not PD-PRC-exempt. Copyright by Propaganda Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. And see s:zh:国家知识产权局关于核准“中国共产党成立100周年庆祝活动标识”特殊标志登记的公告（第412号） shizhao (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Not documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature. SCP-2000 13:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Per above. --忒有钱 (talk) 12:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, is it copyrightable at all? After thinking couple of days and consulting COM:TOO China I decided, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
I assume good faith, but it has a promotional watermark on it: adding their own emailadres to the image. It is a nice picture and maybe you could add it without watermark. See watermarks guideline. Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all uploads of Mangeshbbgore4673 (talk · contribs) due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
File:St. Rita Project Schoolflight students under St. Rita Scoreboard- P.S. Planes 1 & 2-1957.jpg
[edit]
Reupload of File:Bob Blacker built 1st two planes of Project Schoolflight.jpg already tagged for deletion as not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 13:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, and also {{BadJPG}}. --Leyo 22:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
User account "Kjgujgj" is not registered. Please check if you want to create/edit this page Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
User talk:Kjgujgj moved back to User talk:ECCraftGames where it belongs. History of both tps merged. --Achim (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Not relevant DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Is it copyrightable? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyrightable. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files of Bitkom
[edit]BITKOM (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Bitkom Innovation Area auf Hannover Messe 2016.jpg (4928×3264, camera NIKON D7000, author PIXEL)
- File:Hub conference 2016.jpg (5760×3840, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III, author and copyright holder KIDKUTSMEDIA)
Copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 06:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files of Rxshilll
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Rxshilll (talk · contribs):
- File:Burger King Mauritius.jpg
- File:KFC Mauritius.jpg
- File:KFC Mauritius QB.jpg
- File:KFC outlet in Mauritius.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Mauritius and the photos violate KFC's and unknown architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files of Vivek Kumar Pandey
[edit]Vivek Kumar Pandey (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Kedareswar Banrejee.jpg (48×61)
- File:Professor K. Banerjee.jpg (118×156)
Tiny photos, depicted person died in 1975. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files of Светлана878
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of Светлана878 (talk · contribs):
- File:"Зал воинской славы".jpg
- File:"Скорбящая мать" скульптура.jpg
- File:Скульптура "Вечный огонь".jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia and the photos violate sculptors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was an early upload and none of the sources or links exist today, while the other photo is correct. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 11:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a reason to delete the image, because it has OTRS-permission and it is used in multiple projects. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Lifted from www.gbabynames.com. Also out of scope as it is "excluded educational content" Headlock0225 (talk) 12:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Used on agency website therefore a proof of authorization might be needed TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No exif, found widely on the internet, likely taken from Insta. PCP Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned logo only used to promote a TV station. Out of project scope. ✗plicit 12:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
The copyright of part of the content is not 中国新闻网 shizhao (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I support the deletion request. Seems like that I didn't fully check the video and find out this problem. -- Vikarna 13:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
This looks like a widely travelled stock photo of sorts. e.g https://www.discogs.com/artist/6578996-Ernesto-Alban. Only reason I am bringing it here is because it might be old enough to be PD in some form. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Based on some extensive Tineye and Webarchive use, it seems like this image may have been taken from https://web.archive.org/web/20170409083815/http://www.yhtye.com/channel-752.html which shows no free licence that I can see. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Photomontage with yt-like logo, unlikely to be made by uploader Matlin (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Can an administrator delete this file? Core2021 (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Yes. Core2021 (talk) 23:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.commercialtrucktrader.com/ - This isn't the exact same vehicle however If you click here, click the matching image to this one and click save as you will get the random numbers and letters (beginning with 5) - You'll also notice the image has been taken with vans in the far left corner which this image includes too.
The "bestepvanfordva" part here is presumably due to the filter blocking the original numbered/ltettered name, Listing here for review in case others have seen something I haven't. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 16:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Lucas Garcete's book
[edit]
These are two covers of the same book, one of them also had the earlier version, and Amazon gives the fourth one - all in all it looks like a fake (not to say anything about permissions). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marcosperezramiro. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I thought I was adding this to the company profile page (not Wiki Commons). User error. Sorry. 88bnq112 (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan --Elisfkc (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused random image of nondescript shrubbery, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Not used in any articles. Only used in a rejected autobio in draft space. No relevance to the project. Sam Sailor 20:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Redundant against File:ESC 1956 logo.svg; unused. IceWelder [✉] 21:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also to be deleted under the same rationale:
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
This is an outdated logo for Axiom Space. 72.20.137.10 21:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep So what? We keep the logo for archival purposes --Ras67 (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
This is an outdated logo for Axiom Space. 72.20.137.10 21:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep and upgrade the file with the current logo unless there is some reason to retain the logo for valid historical reasons. Timtrent (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep We have to keep the logo for archival purposes. An update is not announced, we already have the current one. --Ras67 (talk) 23:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
This is an outdated logo for Axiom Space. 72.20.137.10 21:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Not relevant DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Lo sentimos, esta imagen no es interesante para una enciclopedia DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files of Ihubertlee
[edit]Here are all contributions of Ihubertlee (talk · contribs):
- File:Hubert Ian Lee.jpg (342×452)
- File:Hubert Receiving Award.jpg (960×640)
- File:Hubert Speaking.jpg (640×938)
- File:The Book From The Future.jpg (cover)
I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:05, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Files of Pope Sindhi
[edit]Pope sindhi (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Church Larkana view.jpg (1032×581)
- File:Main Shahul mahammad.jpg (1032×774)
- File:Palace of Bhopal.png (720×366)
- File:Princess Abida.png (720×647)
- File:Princess Abida Sultan.png (720×375)
- File:Saint Joseph's Catholic Church Larkana.jpg (1032×581)
- File:Sepulchre of merry church Larkana.jpg (581×1032)
Small photos without metadata, different resolution. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - some images are obviously historical images wrongly licensed with CC license. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
source file deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AAxanderr shizhao (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Not like own work shizhao (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- The flickr user listed User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors--shizhao (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
no usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
no usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
no usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright stauts of the several things used in this representation. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [7] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [8] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [9] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikelyto be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [10] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [11] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [12] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [13] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [14] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [15] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [16] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [17] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [18] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [19] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [20] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [21] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [22] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [23] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [24] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [25] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [26] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. Commons:Coats of arms: "the representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable." There is no evidence from where it comes from. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [27] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [28] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [29] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [30] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Based on the information written along the right margin, it appears that the author of this image is asserting all rights to it and does not intend to license it under CC, much less PD. I have no reason to believe that the uploader is the author. Nelson Ricardo 2500 (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Data center sustainability reports
[edit]- File:Digital Reality Data Center References-Clean Energy.pdf
- File:Digital Reality Data Center References-Clean Energy.pdf
- File:Digital Reality Data Center References-2019 ESG Report.pdf
- File:Iron Mountain Wins RE100 Leadership Award for Outstanding Commitments to Clean Energy Alternatives.pdf
- File:Iron-Mountain Data Center References-amsterdam-data-center-ams1.pdf
- File:Iron-Mountain Data Center References-2020-tcfd-report.pdf
- File:Iron-Mountain Data Center References-global-environmental-policy.pdf
- File:Iron-Mountain Data Center References-2020-corporate-responsibility-report.pdf
- File:CyrusOne Data Center References-2020-Sustainablity-Report Final.pdf
- File:CyrusOne Data Center References-Carrollton-Spec-Sheet-Final.pdf
- File:CyrusOne Data Center References-Lewisville-Spec-Sheet-Final.pdf
- File:CyrusOne Data Center References-2018-Allen-30Nov18.pdf
- File:Equinix Data Center References-ds washington dc metro international business exchange en oct2020.pdf
- File:Equinix Data Center References-Sustainability-Report-Highlights-FY2020.pdf
- File:Equinix Data Center References-VA DC7.pdf
- File:Equinix Data Center References-CDP.pdf
- File:Interxion Data Center References-amsterdam-campus-factsheet.pdf
These reports (containing professional photographs and explanatory texts) have not been released under a free license, which means that hosting them on Commons under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license would constitute a copyright violation. Therefore, we have to delete these files. I am filing this deletion request after speaking with the uploader (User:DTankersley (WMF)), who has already switched to links to archived versions of the files on archive.org for the meta:Sustainability#Wikimedia_Foundation_Data_Center_Supplementary_information page, where they are needed. --Gnom (talk) 20:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of valid creative commons licence at cited source MPF (talk) 22:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- I couldn't find a category for "birds" that populated. All of the "bird" references were for paintings and I couldn't figure out how to scroll down. The picture of the birds was taken on the Church property so I listed it under "Church". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FS20000 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:University of Sussex, aerial view.png
- File:Aerial view of the Sussex campus.png
- File:Sussex uni sign.png
- File:Attenborough Arts Centre, University of Sussex.png
I suspect these images are reproductions of another source (possibly screenshots of video), rather than the own work of the uploader, for the following reasons
- The first image appears to be identical, aside from crop and tint, to [31] at 0:15 (note position of pedestrians on the horizontal path, and colours of cars on left side)
- The second image has a black border at top and bottom, suggesting a screenshot/crop
- Small photo sizes, odd for own work but common for screenshots of internet video
- No exif and saved as png, unlike the user's many legitimate-looking uploads which are high resolution jpgs from a Samsung phone
These wouldn't be the only uploads by this user fitting this pattern: File:The Jubilee Building at Sussex.png is a png without exif uploaded as own work, but I was able to find the copyrighted source so submitted it for deletion using {{Copyvio}}. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find exact matches for the above 4 files. -M.nelson (talk) 23:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:OTRS or deletion Albinfo (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 21:27, 3 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 July 2021 --Krdbot 01:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, information taken from another source AnkyLose (talk) 12:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement AnkyLose (talk) 11:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of Noeneto123
[edit]Here are last remaining photos, uploaded by Noeneto123 (talk · contribs):
- File:Gruta de Nossa Senhora de Lourdes - São Lourenço do Oeste SC.jpg (1402×1583)
- File:Lívia Frâncio Rocha Cobalchini.jpg (711×711)
- File:Ricardo Fleury Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Lacerda.png (1192×1428)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Transmission code in some EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of Netajilive
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Netajilive (talk · contribs):
- File:Anurag bhadouria samajwadi party leader.jpg (707×896)
- File:ANURAG SINGH MLA CHUNAR.jpg (4912×7360, camera NIKON D800)
- File:Anurag Singh MLA Chunar.jpg (734×867)
- File:Arjun Bhati cropped.jpg (2824×3403, camera Samsung SM-G955F)
If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of Henrique de Oliveira Carvalho
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Henrique de Oliveira Carvalho (talk · contribs):
- File:Canon EOS 5D Mark II.jpg (1764×1009, author Eraldo Peres)
- File:Henrique Carvalho.jpg (766×610, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II)
- File:Jaibavittorio.jpg (2462×883, camera Canon PowerShot SX100 IS)
- File:Sadaigarape.jpg (2591×1455, camera Canon PowerShot SX100 IS)
Different cameras, one photo is even attributed to somebody else. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of Highmanpiz
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Highmanpiz (talk · contribs):
- File:ArtDanceOfTheTreasureChest.jpg (1200×1800, source – Facebook)
- File:PhotoPoetryBio (4).jpg (750×752)
- File:Vasjan.jpg (1066×1600)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of Guykmb
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of Guykmb (talk · contribs):
- File:ערכת טיפול בכוויות.png (1800×1800)
- File:אמבולנס ברוך ומרפא שאובזר על ידי ממרם.png (1800×1350)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: the first file readily found online, therefore unreliable uploader. But 1800x1800 is not a small image (some of my uploads are smaller!) - please provide stronger DR rationales. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of Y6I9XF1
[edit]Y6I9XF1 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
Old photos. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: historical photos, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
not public domain, non free image 78Game (talk) 10:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. But in my opinion this is still very simple image and ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Taivo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Das ist kein Bild der Hochschule der Bundesagentur für Arbeit. Vermutlich ein Foto einer benachbarten Hochschule. 195.88.117.166 11:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment We can change filenames, descriptions and categories. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please use {{Rename}} or {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LeonSteyn70 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from South African Naval Museum - needs OTRS
- File:South African Navy P 1553 T-Craft entering Knysna.tif
- File:SAS Protea Yarrow sea trials 1972 .tif
Gbawden (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
I feel that this page of original sheet music by a composer who died in 2002 is still within copyright, despite it being not particularly complex since it's for the first five bars of an orchestral piece DS (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not a lawyer, but I'd like to make a couple of arguments for retaining it.
- First, Spike Milligan gave the music to the local orchestra and their committee was keen for me to make this entry. The orchestra's librarian gave me the score to photograph. There's no deed of gift but the librarian remembers it as a gift.
- As you say, it's only 5 bars of a long piece. Also roughly 5 seconds to perform. And it's the title page.
- Musicians and musicologists like seeing the autograph version to see the composer's (music and text) handwriting, so there's a considerable gain in retaining it on wiki. It's unlikely that the score will ever be published, but if that happens, then that version might include the autograph page for historical reason, and then we could take this version down. --Inala (talk) 01:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- I'm fairly sure that your first two points (it was a gift, and the committee wanted it done) aren't relevant in copyright terms. The third point (it's only five bars), though, might be. DS (talk) 06:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 17:26, 3 August 2021, by JuTa. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, PNG, no exif, found widely on the web, unlikely to be own work. PCP Gbawden (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"HOONY STORY"
[edit]Although the posts are labeled as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, the blog's homepage states " 상업적, 이벤트 목적의 가공을 포함한 로고가 크롭되는 모든 2차 가공 금지", which prohibits commercial use and derivative works. This contradicts the Creative Commons license, and photos from this blog can not be hosted on Commons.
✗plicit 12:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée le 21 juin 2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope and there are no obvious copyright problems.
- Keep unless some valid reason for deletion is given for individual files (the files in the category were mass nominated by individual requests). –LPfi (talk) 07:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- I assume the publication year is 1922, the text might not pass the threshold of originality, and might be anonymous. If it is deemed a work by a specific author or group of authors it will soon be PD-old-assumed. –LPfi (talk) 08:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: pure text doc, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée a cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope. Any copyright problems should be studied individually (I suppose the works are PD-old; the sculptor died 92 years ago).
- Keep unless some valid reason for deletion is given for individual files (the files in the category were mass nominated by individual requests).
- Is this a scan from the 1929 book mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition des oeuvres de Charles GARNIER 1888-1929 - cliché du 26 mai 1929.jpg? –LPfi (talk) 08:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: DW, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope and there are no obvious copyright problems.
- Keep unless some valid reason for deletion is given for individual files (the files in the category were mass nominated by individual requests). –LPfi (talk) 07:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Is this a scan from the 1929 book mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition des oeuvres de Charles GARNIER 1888-1929 - cliché du 26 mai 1929.jpg? –LPfi (talk) 08:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope and there are no obvious copyright problems.
- Keep unless some valid reason for deletion is given for individual files (the files in the category were mass nominated by individual requests).
- Is this a scan from the 1929 book mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition des oeuvres de Charles GARNIER 1888-1929 - cliché du 26 mai 1929.jpg? –LPfi (talk) 08:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope. Any copyright problems should be studied individually (I suppose the works are PD-old: the sculptor died 92 years ago).
- Keep unless some valid reason for deletion is given for individual files (the files in the category were mass nominated by individual requests).
- Is this a scan from the 1929 book mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition des oeuvres de Charles GARNIER 1888-1929 - cliché du 26 mai 1929.jpg? –LPfi (talk) 08:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope. Any copyright problems should be studied individually (I suppose the works themselves are PD-old: the sculptor died 92 years ago).
- If the file is a scan from the same exhibition catalogue (?) as the one discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition des oeuvres de Charles GARNIER 1888-1929 - cliché du 26 mai 1929.jpg it might have to be deleted for a few years.
Deleted: Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Je l'ai remplacé par une version améliorée : retouche sur certains noms de lieu. Crob (talk) 16:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded by File:Munkathvera.svg. BTW, please provide the source image for the map!. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted Preetykaur761 (talk) 17:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The Youtube source doesn't seem to be the original creator of the image (COM:LL). -M.nelson (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:LL. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope. The letter seems to be dated in 1920, perhaps 1926 (the scan isn't sharp enough), which is 95–100 years ago.
- Keep unless some valid reason for deletion is given (the files in the category were mass nominated by individual requests).
Deleted: per nomination. This is a letter from 1926 (the expo is from 1925 according to the title). So it is possibly still copyrighted. Can be undeleted safely 120 years after the letter was written, which will be 1926+121=2047.. --Ellywa (talk) 18:47, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Correspondance de Jean-Antoine Injalbert Sculpteur à son élève Charles Garnier en 1913.jpg
[edit]
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ça veut dire fr:Charles Garnier (statuaire). La notabilité n'était pas discuté.
- It seems the article was deleted without any discussion because of the article being weak. The sculptor is probably notable, based on the works in Charles Garnier. Thus it seems the sculptor is in scope. Any copyright problems should be studied individually (I suppose the works are PD-old: the sculptor died 92 years ago).
- Keep unless some valid reason for deletion is given for individual files (the files in the category were mass nominated by individual requests).
- 1929+70 pma=1999. PD in France. 1999 > 1996 and publication year unclear, which may be an issue. The filename hints the letter was written in 1913, so publication might have been any time from then to now. If it is from the 1929 book, copyright in the USA will soon expire –LPfi (talk) 08:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: This letter was written by an artist with articles on the projects, so it seems in scope. Writer of this letter died in 1933, see fr: Jean-Antoine Injalbert. Therefore the letter is in PD and can be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation: as can be seen from https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85:FerasKamal, the picture is made in 1960-ies, so it does not look like it is uploaded by its creator. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 18:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Contains a logo protected by copyright shizhao (talk) 11:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: 您好，这种是不是属于著作权冲突？它本身是PD-CN的，但是包含非公有领域标志，这种应该直接删除吗，还是放在zh-wikisource中的非自由使用？——Zzhtju (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- zh-wikisource似乎不允许非自由使用。我认为可以把pdf中的logo删除--shizhao (talk) 13:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: 可以把logo替换为File:Slogan for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China 20210611.jpg，这是与原logo最相近的自由图片，并加以说明。--Q28 (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- zh-wikisource似乎不允许非自由使用。我认为可以把pdf中的logo删除--shizhao (talk) 13:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Referring to Article 5 and Article 24 item (7) in Copyright Law of PRC and Commons:De minimis, It could be kept. --DreamerBlue (talk) 04:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep and add {{De minimis}}. See also zh:s:黄建中与中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部再审审查与审判监督民事裁定书. It's allowed to use a copyrighted work in a government work.--Njzjz (talk) 18:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. The logo is not laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature; and their official translations. Also the logo is the subject of this document, thus cannot fulfill COM:DM. --SCP-2000 00:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- The PDF is of laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature; and their official translations. --DreamerBlue (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Kept at this moment. This would need a broad discussion, as File:Slogan for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China 20210611 (cropped).png and the uncropped version appear acceptable. On those files the logo is even more prominently visible then on this document. --Ellywa (talk) 11:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: this and other similar photos -- why were over a dozen photos separately nominated with the same rationale and the same considerations? -- are within Commons scope. I see no reason to delete them. The fact that a particular Wikipedia decided that the man does not merit an article of his own is not a reason to delete an image from Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 17:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep The image is in scope (French historical diploma). However, the license is far from accurate, and should be fixed (ideally by someone knowing well France related templates) before keeping the file. --Ruthven (msg) 06:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The illustrator is en:Gustave Louis Jaulmes - d. 1959 (it is signed in the bottom right corner; see also this similar work). Not yet 70 years pma per COM:FRANCE. -M.nelson (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per remark of @M.nelson: , thank again! Can be undeleted in 70 years after 1959 so in 2030 .. --Ellywa (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
la page associée à cette photo a été supprimée par Wikipédia le 21.6.2021 Heliambre (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep The image is in scope (French historical document). However, the license is far from accurate, and should be fixed (ideally by someone knowing well France related templates) before keeping the file. --Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. It seems there are no copyright problems and the file is in use as reference for birth date on Q107361076, see Commons:Village pump#Photos relatives à la page Charles GARNIER statuaire qui a été supprimée le 21 juin 2021. The copyright information needs to be corrected, of course. –LPfi (talk) 07:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader courtesy; uploader requested deletion the day after uploading. Though the file is connected to a Wikidata entry, since the Wikipedia page was deleted, I'm assuming the individual is not notable. -M.nelson (talk) 23:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Image appears in PD when reading one of the comments. The sculptor might be relevant, per this disambiguation page fr: Charles_Garnier and because there exists a wikidata item. In addition this image has been used as source, per this discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Category:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape
[edit]- File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (1).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (2).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (3).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (4).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (5).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (6).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
and probably:
_en_f%C3%A9vrier_2020.jpg){kind=link}
This church is located in France, where there’s no Freedom of panorama ; it dates from 1968 (fr:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape; « Rénovation complète de l’église Saint-Pierre-Chanel », leprogres.fr : “Construite en 1968, l’église Saint-Pierre Chanel est…” (“Constructed in 1968, the Church of St. Pierre Chanel is…”), so the author of the building cannot be dead for 70 years. --37.164.164.201 14:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- This church was built by "Œuvre des Chantiers du Cardinal", which is a non-profit organization. Maybe we should check with them: They could possibly give away their rights to increase their visibility (not sure, this is only an idea). Rc1959 (talk) 19:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Intérieur du Totem (MJC) en février 2020.jpg has no link with this church.
- You cannot recognize any originality through this kind of picture => File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (6).jpg, File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (5).jpg, File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (4).jpg, File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (3).jpg.
- My opinion is these 5 last pictures shoud be kept.
- ---
- The question is opened for File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (1).jpg & File:Église Saint-Pierre-Chanel de Rillieux-la-Pape (2).jpg. These 2 pictures should perhaps be deleted. Who is the architect? Sometimes when the building is not so original, there is no official architect. Perhaps the case here. I'm going to look for the name of this architect (an architect "des Chantiers du Cardinal"?). ----Benoît (d) 22:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Has this “Hey, if we only show half of the facade, it’s not original enough to have a protection” reasonning be done elsewhere? because I don’t see how it could legally be valid at all, as long as you’re not zooming on a technical detail.
- It’s also quite obvious from a look to the building that it has an architect. That’s not a crude warehouse.
- I’ll open (at the end of this one) a different discussion for Intérieur du Totem (MJC) en février 2020.jpg as, yes, it’s a different story. Even if it’s protected in the same ways I think, so it should also be deleted in my opinion.
- @Rc1959: I’m always for getting permissions to publish an image, but the French droit d’auteur is really horrible here, as the only people who keeps the rights is the architect of the building. But contacting the Œuvre des Chantiers du Cardinal may help, if you have the time to do it.
- (And a disclaimer for curious readers, Benoît is the author of the images.)
- 37.170.87.4 14:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC) [the deletion requester]
- Naive suggestion ? Instead of deleting the image, would not it be possible to display a wide red banner onto it, telling something like "WE ARE NOT SURE OF THE COPYRIGHT OF THE IMAGE. IF YOU OWN IT, PLEASE CONTACT US". This would avoid a lot of work (maybe deletion not needed), would be legal (a blurred and hidden image is not usable), show our good faith, and would inform the copyright owners the best possible way. Basically, it would transform "deletion requests" into "blurring/hiding/watermarking requests". What do you think, please ? Rc1959 (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- I’m not a big user of Commons, but IIRC, that’s not the politic of this website. There’s a possibility to transfer images on the French Wikipedia with such an horrible wide red banner (we have voted years ago something like that, I don’t remember the details, probably a limited number of images and only if used in the article), if someone wants to take the time to do that (but that’s not my cup of tea). 37.170.182.100 19:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC) [the deletion requester]
- Naive suggestion ? Instead of deleting the image, would not it be possible to display a wide red banner onto it, telling something like "WE ARE NOT SURE OF THE COPYRIGHT OF THE IMAGE. IF YOU OWN IT, PLEASE CONTACT US". This would avoid a lot of work (maybe deletion not needed), would be legal (a blurred and hidden image is not usable), show our good faith, and would inform the copyright owners the best possible way. Basically, it would transform "deletion requests" into "blurring/hiding/watermarking requests". What do you think, please ? Rc1959 (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, deleted most, including the images which show a metalwork fence, which might be copyrighted as well (and there is no FOP in France). The interior could be kept, as well as the image nr. 5 which shows an outside wall of the church without any personal details of the designer. --Ellywa (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Although the Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, I think this design is so simple it will be in PD. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 11:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Although the Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, I think this design is so simple it will be in PD. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 11:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
The almost identical enwiki file was apparently taken from https://web.archive.org/web/20071027055415/http://www.bka.de/fahndung/personen/meistgesuchte/strangio/bild.html which is not freely licenced. But since Wayback does not properly store ancient images I am not sure Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:NETCOPYVIO - Tineye finds many hits around the internet since 2008. -M.nelson (talk) 20:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 11:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [32] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Although the Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, I think this design is so simple it will be in PD. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 11:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [33] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [34] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [35] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [36] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 11:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [37] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 11:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [38] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 11:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [39] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 11:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [40] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. Source website does not show a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [41] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [42] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page shows a copyright sign and does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [43] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [44] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Consegui encontrar várias outras proposições de eliminação pelos mesmos motivos e envolvendo a mesma conta, ECCraftGames (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) .
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:ITAPICURU Brasão.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Santo Estevão Bandeira.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inhambupe bandeira.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandeira Esplanada.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manoel Vitorino.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandeira Itamaraju.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vera Cruz bandeira.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Municipio-camamu-bandeira-simb-brneba0703005800.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Município Rio Real bandeira.jpg
Pela semelhança, não seria o caso de reunir as proposições em uma única página? Há outras imagens subidas pela mesma conta com os mesmos problemas. Por sinal, a conta vem subindo imagens duplicadas, vide File:Bandeira de Vera Cruz BA.jpg, File:Vera Cruz bandeira.jpg e a recém-eliminada File:Brasão de Vera Cruz BA.jpg. --Luan (talk) 18:11, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Eu subi 3 vezes a mesma imagem, pois anteriormente eu havia esquecido de fornecer os devidos direitos autorais da imagem, hoje quando publiquei já adicionei os devidos direitos.
Deleted per nomination. . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. Ellywa (talk) 12:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [45] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [46] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [47] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [48] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [49] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [50] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [51] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. In addition, the source website shown on the file page does not show the material is available with a free licence. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [52] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [53] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [54] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [55] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [56] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Although the Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, I think this design is so simple it will be in PD. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 13:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [57] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [58] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [59] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [60] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [61] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 12:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shenzhou-12
[edit]Video and screenshot from Tianhe core module, not 中国新闻网. The copyright is not owned by 中国新闻网
- File:Interior of Tianhe during the Shenzhou 12 mission.jpg
- File:Shenzhou 12 crew inside Tianhe.jpg
- File:Shenzhou 12 crew salute.jpg
- File:神舟十二号3名航天员顺利进驻天和核心舱.webm
shizhao (talk) 01:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Not all videos on the 中国新闻网 YouTube channel are published with a CC-BY license, I very much doubt that they would release a video with CC-BY without the proper rights to do so.--BugWarp (talk) 01:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Any decision about the copyright from the images from the Tianhe module? Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP as there is significant doubt about the copyright of the images. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Could an admin with good knowledge of Chinese take a decision, @King of Hearts, Minorax, Jusjih, Mys 721tx, and Shizhao: . It is difficult for me to interprete the logos/text of the film. Ellywa (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You can't slap on a free license for something that isn't an own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [62] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [63] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [64] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [65] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [66] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [67] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [68] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [69] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [70] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [71] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [72] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. The date 1985 is on the arms. While PD Brazil gov is only for images older then 1983. --Ellywa (talk) 13:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [73] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 13:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [74] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [75] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [76] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 13:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [77] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [78] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [79] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [80] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [81] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 13:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [82] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter You should assume that a coat of arms drawn by someone else is copyright-protected unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. No usage license documentation, release of rights. Only one copy of the image. The copier itself is saying Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. City hall website does not show this. [83] In the link it says that it changed. If modified, it's not official. Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 17:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Threshold of originality is pretty low in Brazil, per COM:TOO Brazil, so I think this design copyrighted. The age of the design is not proven by the uploader per COM:EVID, so it is unclear whether the terms of Template:PD-BrazilGov are fulfilled. --Ellywa (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Not "laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature; and their official translations"
- File:Column 12 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 11 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 10 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 9 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 8 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 6 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 7 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 5 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 4 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 3 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 2 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 1 of 2021 Plan.jpg
- File:Column 20 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 19 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 18 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 17 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 12 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 16 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 14 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 15 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 13 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 11 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 10 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 9 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 8 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 6 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 7 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 5 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 3 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 4 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 2 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 1 of the 14th Five-Year Plan.jpg
- File:Column 1 Development Goals for 2035.jpg
- File:The main indicators of the national comprehensive three-dimensional transportation network in 2035.jpg
- File:Column 3 Layout of the main skeleton of the national comprehensive three-dimensional transportation network.jpg
- File:Column 2 The layout of the national comprehensive three-dimensional transportation network.jpg
- File:Column 4 International comprehensive transportation hub.jpg
- File:Column 5 Requirements for the integrated planning and construction of a comprehensive transportation hub.jpg
- File:A Brief Chronology of Chinese History 02.jpg
- File:A Brief Chronology of Chinese History 01.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Chart2-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Chart1-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table10-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table7-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table9-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table8-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table5-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table6-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table4-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table3-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table2-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Table1-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Chart6-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Chart5-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Chart4-zh.jpg
- File:China's National Defense in the New Era Chart3-zh.jpg
shizhao (talk) 12:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: 《中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要》和《关于2020年国民经济和社会发展计划执行情况与2021年国民经济和社会发展计划草案的报告》收录于《中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报》2021年第三号中。根据《党政机关公文处理工作条例》，公报国家行政机关公文的一种具有行政性质。——Zzhtju (talk) 12:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- 不确定公报算不算是具有行政性质的公文--shizhao (talk) 12:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the unused ones, purely text docs that are out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: most of these files are used on zh.wikisource.org, so these cannot be deleted on basis of COM:SCOPE. As the non-used images are part of a series, I do not consider it justified to delete these, as a part of these series. So decided to keep all, as there is no copyright problem according to the arguments in the discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 11:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
not PD-PRC-exempt
- File:中国“十四五”规划 长三角地区轨道交通规划图.jpg
- File:中国“十四五”规划 京津冀地区轨道交通规划图.jpg
- File:中国“十四五”规划 重要生态系统保护和修复重大工程布局示意图.jpg
- File:Attachment Schematic diagram of the main skeleton layout of the national comprehensive three-dimensional transportation network.jpg
- File:中国“十四五”规划 大型清洁能源基地布局示意图.jpg
- File:中国“十四五”规划 城镇化空间格局示意图.jpg
- File:中国“十四五”规划 粮食生产功能区和重要农产品生产保护区布局示意图.jpg
- File:中国“十四五”规划 粤港澳大湾区轨道交通规划图.jpg
shizhao (talk) 12:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: 请问你作为管理员，做提删之前都不做查证的吗？中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报不是PD-PRC-exempt吗？这些图片收录在公报2021年第三号中。——Zzhtju (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- 这些图片版权不明，可能是PD，也可能是国家机关合理使用了相关机构（规划院、设计院、设计公司等）的版权图片。国家机关处于行政需要可以任意使用，但是国家机关以外的人/机构没有这个权利--shizhao (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- 既然没标是版权图片，是不受著作权保护的文档的一部分，就应该默认为不是版权图片。如果是个人、机构绘制，那么他们就相当于一定程度上参与了相关政策、法规、规划的制订。--維基小霸王 (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- 这些图片版权不明，可能是PD，也可能是国家机关合理使用了相关机构（规划院、设计院、设计公司等）的版权图片。国家机关处于行政需要可以任意使用，但是国家机关以外的人/机构没有这个权利--shizhao (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Asked for help on the Administrators noticeboard. Ellywa (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete With my limited knowledge on China's copyright policies. I suggest deleting these files as 1. Maps are not covered by {{PD-PRC-exempt}} 2. There is no source for base map. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment, thanks @Minorax: . --Ellywa (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
not PD-PRC-exempt shizhao (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: 《关于2020年国民经济和社会发展计划执行情况与2021年国民经济和社会发展计划草案的报告》收录于《中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报》2021年第三号中。根据《党政机关公文处理工作条例》，公报国家行政机关公文的一种具有行政性质。——Zzhtju (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Asked for help on the Administrators noticeboard. Ellywa (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: Isn't this considered to be a numerical table? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep For me it looks that it is covered by PD-PRC-exempt as at least "simple factual information" or "numeric table". I am sure that the graph shows simple facts but their presentation is typically unfree but here it could be simple enough. And maybe it is exempt as an official document from the Fourth Session of the Thirteenth National People's Congress rubin16 (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The figure can meet {{PD-chart}}. Even the figure cannot meet {{PD-PRC-exempt}}, it is much simple as it only shows factual information and doesn't contain any original and creative elements. SCP-2000 14:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, thank you all!. --Ellywa (talk) 14:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
