Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 26th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader does't seem to have the copyrights of this work. In the description it says '©Arnaud Olszak' Ecritures (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


'Deleted by Túrelio at 20:18, 26 Mai 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: The uploader does't seem to have the copyrights of this work. In the description it says '©Arnaud Olszak --Krdbot 03:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, has Amazon logo, looks like cut out of something else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by DMacks at 08:00, 27 Mai 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tusmuertospisaos.png: Unlikely own work, has Amazon logo, looks like cut out of something else. --Krdbot 08:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More files of the same type as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic, also including several versions of some files and some svg spin-offs. The main bulk is made by the same now-blocked editor. Needless to say, no sources...

TU-nor (talk) 06:38, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infrogmation: I am quite confident that they are all pure fantasy. They are all uploaded by the currently blocked user Santiago RD (except a small number of svg spin-offs). The same user has been very active putting those flags into templates in eswiki (especially es:Plantilla:DOM) and enwiki (like en:Template:Country data Azua, en:Template:Country data Azua Province etc. etc.) as well as in any number of articles in enwiki and eswiki about "Miss Dominican Republic 20XX" and similar. They have also added flags to the entries of municipalities and provinces at wikidata (like here), making them show up automatically in articles in some wikis. This cross-wiki activity has helped spreading the fake flags all around wiki. They have been challenged in enwiki and eswiki and here at commons to explain what their sources are for the flags, but they have as far as I can see never made one single edit to any talk page or user talk page, nor have they ever used an edit summary. This is (I think) the last batch of the more than 200 fake Dominican Republic flags they have created, but they have also created similar fake flegs for Bahamas, Greece, South Africa. I will in due time nominate also those for removal. Regards! --TU-nor (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More recreated fictitious flags earlier removed in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic, now reuploaded by same editor as the last round of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic

TU-nor (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here we go again. New user name this time, but same files that have been added and removed several times before, with same or slightly different file names, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic (above!) for just a few of the latest, or Commons:Deletion requests/DR Provincial flags, Commons:Deletion requests/DR Hoax flags and Commons:Deletion requests/DR Hoax flags 2 for older examples. The only reason the files are used in different wikis is that the uploader has put them into Wikidata immediately after uploading they here. Needless to say, they are completely unsourced. The one flag sticking out, is the Peravia one, which is uploaded some years ago by another user. That is just a svg version of a png file that was deleted in an earlier batch, but somehow the svg version escaped. It is just as unsourced as the others.

TU-nor (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: Two more files were for some reason not placed in the same category, but should be treated together with them:
--TU-nor (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vacation photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this logo meets the Commons:Threshold of originality and is not "simple geometric shapes or text". Uploader removed previous speedy deletion notice. MKFI (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:47, 30 Mai 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in naming one of the enantiomers Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 11:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Request by uploader. --Leyo 09:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person photo. Out of scope. --ToprakM 00:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

people missuses Rahatahmedrafi (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pepole miss use Rahatahmedrafi (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

people miss use my signature Rahatahmedrafi (talk) 08:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

people missuses Rahatahmedrafi (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

people miss use my signature Rahatahmedrafi (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution, unidentifiable, unused — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logos, not used in any articles or Wikimedia umbrella pages (other than OgreBot automated monitoring pages). Out of COM:SCOPE and COM:NOTUSED.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

usless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

usless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Healthinformatics 1398 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. No details about the subject of the photo, so could be {{Out of scope}}. Also, the file name suggests this came from Facebook. Sreejith K (talk) 15:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused blurred photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a resume. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FRAN2022 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal file collection, unused, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   19:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   19:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed COM:LR, dead link source. Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused failed upload of simple outline map, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: Agree. This is my file. Bug fixed years ago. No more needed. Thank Yug (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ravens Rockabilly club (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional images of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope. And logos are above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9   19:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res image with large watermarks but without context or meaningful description, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Essam.abdellatif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope. Also this is not a website for sharing selfies. Eaaaaugh (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Ecritures (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope, personal photo. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely this person has given permission for this picture; no educational value Ecritures (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Ecritures (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, out of scope Ezarateesteban 21:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, no educational purpose, out of scope Ezarateesteban 21:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable people, out of scope Ezarateesteban 21:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear purpose / educational use. Elli (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soph.St (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person is unknown. educational value is unknown as well. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dorothyclt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various images from the source "Noah's Ark Hong Kong". As there is no permission from the said source and author, and the uploader is not the author, the files therefore lacks proper permission.

廣九直通車 (talk) 04:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 05:37, 2 June 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:My Parliament(2.4).svg --Krdbot 14:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 05:37, 2 June 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:My Parliament(1.1).svg --Krdbot 14:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images have been uploaded with a claim of a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license for which no proof has been provided. Two of the photos come with an elaborate notice within their EXIF data. Quote:

©SWR, honorarfrei - Verwendung im Rahmen einer engen, unternehmensbezogenen Berichterstattung im SWR-Zusammenhang bei Nennung "Bild: SWR". SWR Baden-Baden, Unternehmensarchiv/Bildarchiv, Tel. 07221/9292-3364, Fax -6389, E-Mail: Bettina.Reiss@swr.de

This is a press release which allows a very limited re-use, provided it is republished within a context of a report about SWR (Southwest Broadcasting, a public broadcasting corporation in Germany). This is not a release which conforms to COM:L.

AFBorchert (talk) 07:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle der Dateien

Antwort des SWR am 5. Februar 2021 nach Anfrage meinerseits:

Sehr geehrte Frau ...,

meine Kollegin hat jetzt auch noch honorarfreie Fotos vom Sender Reutlingen und Sigmaringen gefunden und einen Text.

Herzliche Grüße

J. B.

HA Information, Dokumentation und Archive des SWR und des SR Unternehmensarchiv

SWR

Südwestrundfunk

Hans-Bredow-Straße 18

76530 Baden-Baden

Tel: +49 (0)7221 9292

Fax: +49 (0)7221 9292

j.b.@swr.de

SWR.de

--Hohenzollernsche Lande (talk) 10:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} release as claimed. You need a release in conformance to COM:L. --AFBorchert (talk) 04:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are still under copyright Ecritures (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:16, 3 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are still under copyright Ecritures (talk) 20:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:16, 3 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are still under copyright Ecritures (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:16, 3 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are still under copyright Ecritures (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:16, 3 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are still under copyright Ecritures (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:16, 3 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are still under copyright Ecritures (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:16, 3 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victor i Iker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Illustrations from a clearly marked (C) book online https://www.alicante.es/sites/default/files/documentos/libro-publicacion/personajes-escena-alicantina/pea-libro-completo.pdf.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 08:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are two images at this filename: one low quality (small, gray background, uneven bonds) and one chemically incorrect (missing an oxygen atom, as noted by User:LegionMammal978). File:Citromycetin.svg is high quality and correct. DMacks (talk) 01:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not obvious what mistake User:Marbletan saw, but I see incorrect diazo geometry and File:1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol structure.svg as a correct replacement DMacks (talk) 01:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. When I wrote "The C-N=N-C bond sequence should not be depicted as linear", I was pointing out the same incorrect diazo geometry that you note. I replaced the final use of the nominated file with your suggested replacement, so this incorrect image should be deleted now. Marbletan (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I had not looked at the wiki-source of your tag, just the display, which was not displaying due to equals-sign in the text itself. Wiki templates are fun! DMacks (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copied off the internet, many hits such as https://shipmanagementinternational.com/wartsila-launches-efficient-new-aframax-tanker-design/ Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photoshopped photo taken off the web, such as at https://www.cambiasorisso.com/2016-will-be-remembered-among-tanker-owners-as-the-year-of-opecs-decision-to-curb-oil-output-says-shipbroker/ Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harvey214 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly mixed authorship (some maybe from uploader but others may be from his fellow people, neighbors, etc.. in the area), considering the inconsistent resolutions (from 274px to staggering 2,048px) and missing or inconsistent metadata. Per COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle, we must treat these inconsistent reso-images with caution. If some come from persons other than the uploader, COM:OTRS verification must be needed.

Not to mention the varied quality of the images. Some blurry, others fine, probably from devices of different persons.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toik1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of some website, not own work and beyond COM:TOO. A TinEye search finds similar screenshots by other YouTube users.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the metadata it is from the Flickr of a professional photographer. I can't find it there in a quick search but here is another photo of the same person, marked copyrighted. Will assume this file is licensed the same unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karine.vanina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All or at least most of images are taken from elsewhere without a permission to release them under WP-allowed free license (in one case, photo of a person is attributed to Monika Skolimowska who is not the same person as uploader) and falsely marked as "own work". 2-3 images can probably be retained under PD as text or trivial logos if described appropriately (not at CC-BY-SA self), others not.

Tatewaki (talk) 01:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial FOP in Morocco, and the image focuses on the recent building in a main subject basis, without authorization from the architect. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prominent element in these images is the artistic work by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen. No FOP for non-architectural artworks in the United States.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for non-architecture in the United States. The artwork (Shuttlecocks) fails US DM as it is noticeable in the images (not trivial). The artwork is a work of Claes Oldenburg who once sent take down notices to Wikimedia Foundation over unauthorized hosting of users' images of his artwork here (mostly those in the United States).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Central ring has incorrect oxygen placement (should not be a bis-acetal). See Category:Streptomycin for several high-quality and apparently-correct alts. DMacks (talk) 01:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 02:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a cropped version of the book cover from the defunct website (archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20121203134205/http://www.vishwagna.com:80/# ) which mentions "2011 - 2012, vishwagna.com, All rights reserved". Hence this is not copyright free. Arjunaraoc (talk) 03:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The book cover image at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sri-potuluri-veera-brahmendra-swami-kalagnanam-mmbm.jpg, which also needs to be deleted, for which another deletion notice is being submitted. --Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the book cover from the defunct website (archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20121203134205/http://www.vishwagna.com:80/# ) which mentions "2011 - 2012, vishwagna.com, All rights reserved". Hence this is not copyright free. Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even though the uploader claims that he is the designer, the design includes links to defunct website (archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20121203134205/http://www.vishwagna.com:80/# ) which mentions "2011 - 2012, vishwagna.com, All rights reserved". Hence this is not copyright free. Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo seems to be created by uploader, but the copyrights belong to the organisation, which commissioned the work. uvguo.com is not live . As the permission fom uvguo is not available, this should be deleted. Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work was created for defunct website (archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20121203134205/http://www.vishwagna.com:80/# ) which mentions "2011 - 2012, vishwagna.com, All rights reserved". Hence this is not copyright free. Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appers to be the logo of an organisation claimed as "own work" PamD (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag), change to normal deletion tag as we need to investigate the threshold of originality (TOO) situation in Turkey, there's still lack of related informations. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for investigating - I used to have some info about rules for Turkish logos but got rid of it some time ago and don't remember where it came from. No need to do lots of work on this unless it will benefit other people in future - I just found out that they have different logos for their 3 languages so they can just as well go on Wikipedia - if in doubt please delete Chidgk1 (talk) 07:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under URAA don't think this image is free to use under US copyright laws. Please review. 2406:3400:315:9840:7C87:C5F6:8FD5:44AA 19:21, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Storng keep. The sock who nominated this is blocked indef.Umair Aj (talk) 23:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Biased nomination. Please keep the file.00:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that this photo was captured in 1954. 116.58.200.198 15:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. There is zero evidence that this photo was captured in 1954.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof on behalf of photo capturing date. 37.111.199.218 06:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, no source of it's capturing date. Most probably this photo was captured at least 50 years ago but there is no proof that this photo is from the year of 1954. 37.111.197.235 14:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per the previous discussions. No new evidence has been presented. The date may be unreliable but it is clear that the photograph is old enough to be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete; In Wikimedia commons real photo publication year/date is required, {{PD-Pakistan}} template may be applied but real photo publication year with source/reference is needed. 37.111.218.163 05:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per the previous decision. These are most probably sock IPs of blocked master sock Gori Nadu[1].Paytime (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, no source. 119.30.39.252 16:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep no valid reason for deletion. Singer died 38 years back and the photo is more than 50 years old._Satrar (talk) 17:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reference of its publication year. 119.30.32.160 15:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per Pakistan PD law. A09090091 (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per {{PD-Pakistan}} and as per same reason given by Verbcatcher for previous nominations. Most probably these are sock Ips of blocked sock master Gori Nadu[2].-Paytime (talk) 14:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, this appears to be a publicity shot and it is credited to 'Evernew recording studio', which is presumably related to the Evernew film studios in Lahore.[3] Publicity photographs are usually published shortly after their creation. The apparent age of Ahmed Rushdi supports the 1954 date. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alamy has this photo and declares it to be public domain.[4] Verbcatcher (talk) 15:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Current status of 1951–72 buildings is not OK, and this 1954 (current) church building (designed by w:Jose L. De Ocampo who died in 1995). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Philippines. Current rules still remain according to IPOPHL-BCRR: the need of permission from the architect's heirs. Otherwise, restore when freedom of panorama is introduced here officially and formally. 124.106.129.212 07:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof has been provided for {{Copyrighted free use}}. As this is beyond the threshold of originality, it is eligible for copyright. Hence, {{PD-textlogo}} does not apply as claimed. AFBorchert (talk) 07:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is beyond the threshold of originality, {{PD-textlogo}} does not apply. AFBorchert (talk) 07:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is beyond the threshold of originality, hence {{PD-ineligible}} does not apply. A proof for {{Copyrighted free use}} has not been provided. AFBorchert (talk) 07:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It probably comes from some porn page.. 78.102.127.47 07:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment You, an random IP, open an dr without any proofs, just hearsaying. It shows that copyright is probably not your problem with this image. But anyway, this image was available in 5th November 2014, three years before of the upload to commons, in planetsuzy.org, so  Delete. Tm (talk) 07:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source site is published under license "© 2008-2021 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved." Maybe the file violates authors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC) It is published in Cambridge University Press. It does not violate the copyright. See:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/evolutionary-human-sciences/article/populations-dynamics-in-northern-eurasian-forests-a-longterm-perspective-from-northeast-asia/1FF8B5513D3D2598BD8D7C13FA7B0FA6. I will include the actual reference link.HunanZH (talk) 08:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sourcing provided by User:HunanZH passes muster. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: watermarked image, source link is directly to image and gives no context on copyright status. MKFI (talk) 08:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has "All rights reserved.", OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (low resolution, available but as image and video on several social media). 4ing (talk) 08:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that this photo was captured in 1959 or it is may be a movie still - here there is also no proof that this movie still is from a 1959 movie. 103.67.158.129 15:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. No proof that this photo (most probably a screenshot from a film) is from the year 1959.
  •  Keep for licensing purposes it does not matter whether the 1954 date is accurate. {{PD-Pakistan}} requires that the photograph was taken more then 50 years ago, i.e. before 1970. Waheed Murad was born in 1938 so would have been 32 in 1970. He looks in his early 20s in this photo.
  •  Keep. This photo is more than 60 years old since Waheed Murad looks in his early 20s.Paytime (talk) 19:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo capturing year has been wrongly mentioned. 37.111.199.218 06:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, Waheed Murad started his film acting career in 1960s not in the 1950s. (The photo-year is wrong, it can't be 1959). 37.111.199.165 13:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, no source/reference of it's publication year. 37.111.199.188 14:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep no valid reason for deletion since no new evidence is provided. Actor died 38 years back and the photo is more than 50 years old._Satrar (talk) 17:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reference of its publication year.119.30.32.160 15:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per pAkistan PD law. A09090091 (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per {{PD-Pakistan}}. Most probably these are sock Ips of blocked sock master Gori Nadu[6].-Paytime (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep are you serious or just nominating every time for fun only? It seems you are only targeting Waheed Murad and Ahmed Rushdi again and again. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 119.160.65.131 (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep no valid reason for deletion since no new evidence is provided. Moreover, repeated deletion requests normally considered as disruption. Satrar (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The sock IP who nominated this file for deletion is blocked for vandalism._Paytime (talk) 22:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Few useless category redirects

[edit]

Empty category redirects, some useless, some illiterate:

--Orijentolog (talk) 08:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed, poor quality (screenshot), the text duplicates File:Koshur.png (minor font variation not justifying storage here) — kashmīrī 09:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Copyright holder Stevel Marc Author Stevel Marc". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 10:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free, taken from https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1081751/naples-round-up-day-five Lugnuts (talk) 10:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution, unclear source — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press photo, authorship uncertain. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author Frank Metzemacher Copyright holder Copyright© Frank Metzemacher / Lichtreim". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 11:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative from external works eg. that car photo according to search. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even more fictitious flags by the same editor as in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic, but for some reason moved to new category by another (?probably the same) editor (now indeffed) behind the files in Commons:Deletion requests/Again Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic. In this case, the files are in use in several wikis, but only because the same editors have placed them in Wikidata and in templates in es-Wiki.

TU-nor (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request, the person depicted doesn't grant permission to upload it to Commons Ezarateesteban 13:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

also nominated File:Lucía Abellán as Ophelia.jpg
I agree. The person photographed wants no photos of hers on Commons because she did not give her express consent for CC-BY-SA license or any other. She has contacted me to have them deleted from Commons. Dorieo (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was my poor first attempt at creating the team's cap logo. It has been superseded by a more accurate version. It is unused and too old for G7. NatureBoyMD (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No ways was this taken before 1926, when he would have only been ~25 Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "KIh53sfHOTAOB1jDaxTa", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "RZ0-QW_5BNMhlik2k4H4", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "f7eFlKds8odmwluPEwqI", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "6SZrxoo8_BiHZ9Lexbzb", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "JoNdhcmMEnq3nOheiqZv", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "pVkJru40WmYEqlHINb3S", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "v-twYl8aIOD7Pulg0wHN", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "bTGfEdLnBx_tzGh9wGu1", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "VA950G_BS_HOowNExaDm", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "3hea90Fg0oBydYys93bw", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "Jwo55VZJLOTsyZ6LqSK-", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "SwJhoRbkUzeWFwOVwYE7", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "mOUl2j0SjI-l9ewARwf5", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a true self-photographed image. The bad quality plus suspicious black margins suggests it might be another image, or a TV screen. In any case, it is a derivative work of an underlying work (image or video feed). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "-6NbxeH-HZNXYJKVnnBK", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "RoDC5OELjFIo6RFDwerr", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "QWWOUnY2xeZJyJ7cdY7Q", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "NuCmsFh5o9BZkdcZWYTW", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope file that shows mostly textual content. Possible derivative work issue too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "oIKE0CW5Hpmx8PHQKgy2", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "iPXvDcBzQO1q4CsfOOOD", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "t18cPvj56_gcmZ46pk8m", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "34WWJEpRX4U-yeFB8KgB", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "b799tOBXigZK-ZkZRb_7", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onward piagapo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Portraitures of disputed origin. The uploader claims it is their own work. But it is impossible that he lived years ago just to capture images of Piagapo figures from 1960s. Though some may be claimed as {{PD-Philippines}} and {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}, such claims need to be proved (more problematic is that if the municipal government just commissioned photographers, in which per COM:COMM Philippines copyright still rests with the photographers, unless "there is a written stipulation on the contrary."

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a derivative work of a computerized rendition of a proposed building. The rendition's copyright remains with the person / artist who made this rendition. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of it's publication year. 37.111.197.235 14:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. Singer died 38 years back and the photo is more than 50 years old._Satrar (talk) 17:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reference of its publication year. 119.30.32.160 15:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per Pakistan PD law. A09090091 (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per {{PD-Pakistan}} and as per same reason given by Verbcatcher for previous nominations. Most probably these are sock Ips of blocked sock master Gori Nadu[8].-Paytime (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: making repeated deletion requests without giving new reasons or evidence is disruptive. This appears to be a still from a YouTube video [link, at 1:24]. The YouTube page indicates that this is a clip from the 1967 Pakistani film Doraha which public domain, see COM:Pakistan. The YouTube page name includes 'Haan isi mor par', and Ahmed Rushdi sang this song in the film. Even if the information on the YouTube page is incorrect, the YouTube video is clearly from a film or a TV broadcast which would have been published soon after it was created, and Ahmed Rushdi's apparent age indicates that is sufficiently old to be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021 (UTC)

 Comment The sock IP who nominated this file for deletion is blocked for vandalism and disruption._Paytime (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work, yet just a scan of a map from Mines and Geosciences Bureau (mgb.gov.ph). While it may fall under {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}, the map is not immediately available in the government agency's website, thereby making verification difficult. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner of the vehicle does not want the photo in public domain. Shot was originally taken by me. Shadman al Samee (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner of the vehicle does not want the photo in public domain. Photographer requested for deletion previously, As a uploader, I am requesting again. Afifa Afrin (talk) 22:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Japan. eien20 (talk) 14:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of numerous portraits and photo ops. Might be {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} but see COM:COMM Philippines. COM:OTRS permissions from the photographers of the individual photographs may be required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from video game 2A02:1812:41D:B800:E11F:C110:A892:8CC2 14:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work of the depicted copyrighted figure. The artist (de:Hans Tomamichel) died 1984, so the figure is still copyrighted. Sandstein (talk) 14:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--EinDao (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Ii just changed the background --EinDao (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. Needs license confirmation from actual photographer/copyright holder via OTRS. If not, delete per COM:PCP.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. Needs license confirmation from actual photographer/copyright holder via OTRS. If not, delete per COM:PCP.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. Needs license confirmation from actual photographer/copyright holder via OTRS. If not, delete per COM:PCP.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. Needs license confirmation from actual photographer/copyright holder via OTRS. If not, delete per COM:PCP.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. Needs license confirmation from actual photographer/copyright holder via OTRS. If not, delete per COM:PCP.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cl.lefevre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LoveInsulator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All those files lack exif data, no evidence of permission, so probably not own work, therefore to be deleted per COM:PCP. If the uploader is the photographer, he needs to confirm that he is via OTRS.

Kai3952 (talk) 15:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To give the photo this public domain tag which has the copyright term as "the author's life plus 70 years or fewer" we would need to know the author and when they died. It would also help to link the blog it came from, or preferably the source the blogger got it from. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is listed as Julien Mandel who died in 1961, so the 70-year public domain tag given does not apply quite yet. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licensing: probably not own work or licensed under CC BY-SA — especially because it's a selfie —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vsemoguchi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader doesn't appear to be the same as person credited with these photos (Vsemoguchi = Dari Ingal?). Needs COM:OTRS.

P 1 9 9   16:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by Dari: Just because I go by nickname doesn't mean its not the same person. Yo just like to nominate images to be deleted. Here is the link where those images can be found with both names underneath them: Dari Ingal = Vsemoguchi. http://artlantic.design/mangyans/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vsemoguchi (talk • contribs) 19:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dari for your high quality images. Please use the OTRS process (that is the best and proper way to prove ownership of the images). I am not sure if a closing admin would find the above statement sufficient. --P 1 9 9   20:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keeping for now to allow User:Dari Ingal or User:Vsemoguchi to send COMMONS:OTRS for these photographs. they will be deleted in one week of OTRS is not provided. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of Germany (1935–1945).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These YouTube channels quite clearly take media from celebrities' social media so it is very unlikely that the Creative Commons license is valid.

Dylsss (talk) 16:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work. Small file sizes, poor quality, and no one has own work on record albums.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ellin Beltz You have to be kidding me. The Billie Eilish photo belongs to my OWN SISTER! She took the photo and gave me permission to use it! Meaning I can upload wherever the hell I want! The impractical joker photos were uploaded by James Murray (comedian). One of the main four of the show. The Chris Issac one is perfect quality and was uploaded by someone else. And the music ones provide coverage to "primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question". This is so ridiculous. I am taking this to an admin ASAP. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom - Clearly copyrighted images. Also the images are so tiny they're effectively useless, Images should be deleted and uploader above should be blocked for this theatrical performance. –Davey2010Talk 21:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1 image was linked to Ebay, Another was to Flickr with a CC licence (not sure if this is legit but to be safe it should be deleted) and the rest being from the uploader themselves. Bar Flickr the rest are copyrighted it's obvious. –Davey2010Talk 21:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Even by admission File:Iloveyoulive.jpg isn't the uploader's own work, doesn't matter if it was a still from a video that a family member filmed, it doesn't make it your own work. However I have serious doubts that is the case. I also find it interesting that the uploader uses png for photographs, File:Chris Isaak 2017.png for example should've been cropped from the original jpg as a jpg (Commons has a tool for that type of thing). Bidgee (talk) 22:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The description for File:Chris Isaak 2017.png states it's extracted from File:Hall And Oates with Chris Isaak - The O2 - Saturday 28th October 2017 HallOatesO2281017-26 (24446890518).jpg; so, unless this isn't the case or the source image is also a copyvio, a crop can't be a copyvio, can it? If the only problem is the format, then it seems that a new crop could be created in the same format as the original. It doesn't, however, make sense to delete the crop as a copyvio unless the original is also deleted for the same reason. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Um, actually no, we're not kidding you. According to COM:L, the images we host for free have to have certain kinds of licenses. "My sister" and "my friend" is not "own work." If you can get the actual photographer's permission, please have them fill in the really simple email form at COM:OTRS. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC) PS: I am an admin . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Shoot for the Stars' version of "File:Themanwhosoldtheworldbowie.png" was unsourced and missing a status tag, although the image itself would probably have been fine if it had been sourced and tagged. Anyway, it was overwritten by another user with a different image (about the same topic) with a source and status tags. Not sure what to do with that. The usurpation of a filename (instead of uploading under a different filemane) is not a good move. But maybe it can be acceptable if the previous unsourced version is deleted. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Originally tagged as "no permission", as the uploader assigned {{PD-USGov}} as the license and the photos were sourced to the Fairfield (CT) Police Department, which is not a part of the federal government. The uploader has since changed the license to File:Stephen Buchanan Mugshot.webp to {{PD-author}} citing https://www.nj.gov/nj/legal.html, which doesn't work, because it's for the state government of New Jersey, not Connecticut.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It states that in the US state of Connecticut, "mugshots are considered public record, there are no exemptions in the Act that prohibits public access and anyone can retrieve them." Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shoot for the Stars I think you had the correct link that dealt with mugshots in Connecticut (https://connecticut.staterecords.org/criminal.php) but changed to an incorrect link that deals with accident reports. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - A public record is not usually PD -- Everything on the web is public, but very little of it is free of copyright restrictions. Connecticut is not one of the limited number of states that does not claim copyright in its works. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source doesn't state that this is a 13th century painting. Also, several other websites say that this is painting of Babur (e.g. [9][10][11][12]), not Aibak Utcursch (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong filename HansJAB (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please request a file rename via COMMONS:RENAME. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong filename HansJAB (talk) 18:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please request a file rename via COMMONS:RENAME. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source doesn't state that this is from 1948, no evidence that this is in public domain. Also, the source website is an unreliable blog that has mis-labeled several images (e.g. an image of Babur being presented as that of Qutb-al-Din Aibak). Can't find any reliable source for this being an image of Muhammad of Ghor. Utcursch (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also see en:Talk:Muhammad of Ghor#Authenticity_of_File:Muhammad_Ghori.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Thisisvienna

[edit]

Magazine covers, copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shovonian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User appears to be taking images from the web and claiming them as their own.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by Eduardo Castrillo died in 2016. No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Used to describe the statue at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Juan,_Metro_Manila Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likey Flickr washed - only one uploaded (on flickr) no meta data, and immediately uploaded on Wikipedia FOX 52 (talk) 18:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work but stock photo, found all over the internet. P 1 9 9   19:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this picture. I didn't end up using it, and only listed it as 'own work' so Wikimedia Commons would actually let me use it. It was a licence free image and I listed the name of the creator of the picture when thinking of using the image as part of an assessment, but I didn't end up using it.


Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtd1986 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Original source is https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1552421-dancing-cockroach . And it does not have a free license Eaaaaugh (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg Eaaaaugh (talk) 19:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this logo meets Commons:Threshold of originality and is not "simple geometric shapes or text". MKFI (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncorrect logo. Real logo of Napoli Soccer was different. See: File:Napoli Soccer 2004.svg and related source. The White Lion (talk) 20:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncorrect logo. Real logo of Napoli Soccer was different. See: File:Napoli Soccer 2004.svg and related source. The White Lion (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to Jim Haylebroek: https://www.usaid.gov/results-data/success-stories/democracy-making-somaliland The source is usaid.gov, so there's a chance the image is in public domain, but I don't see anything confirming that. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a copyrighted song, actual author is DaBaby. It does not have a free license accosiated with the file. Eaaaaugh (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation because read Commons:Toy Eaaaaugh (talk) 20:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't depict what the file name says: no educational value Ecritures (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, because Roblox gameplays and avatars are non-free. Eaaaaugh (talk) 20:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from ROBLOX game. Out of scope, so please read https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Scope Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are copyrighted Ecritures (talk) 20:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this work is still alive: his works are copyrighted Ecritures (talk) 20:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO - professionally posed/shot of notable persons, Facebook EXIF, uploaded among blatant copyvios of same subject matter, etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist alive, no freedom of panorama. No permission of author. Carolus (talk) 20:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Just for the record: Belgium adopted Freedom of Panorama by law as of 1 January 2015. FOP Belgium extends to church interiors, as is clear from several of your own uploads. FOP doesn't care if the artist is alive or died 16 years ago. Vysotsky (talk) 22:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Vysotsky, {{FoP-Belgium}} applies. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is my own work. The SAME photograph exists in bigger size and under the better title Fortaleza de Sagres, Algarve, Portugal.jpg TWICE. Thanks in advance. Monika Hoerath (talk) 20:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to me a pretty clear place of Commons:License laundering, the image is a still from the "Kiss Me More" music video which is not under any CC license, but the source here is from a random YouTube video which is under a CC license. LivelyRatification (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professionally staged/posed/shot image of purportedly notable person uploaded with blatant COM:NETCOPYVIO (File:MaggieSzabo2021A.jpg) of same subject with bogus self claim (implicitly acknowledged by uploader) - Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 21:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Boots and background suggest this is from the same photoshoot as this Rolling Stone image, which credits photographer "Ian Maxion" (compare to file name here of "IanmaxionIMG 0040 1". Эlcobbola talk 21:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is no brooch; it is a piece of paper with writing in crayon Ecritures (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a different one Jq408 (talk) 22:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made one to combine 2 Jq408 (talk) 22:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original transmission metadata suggestive of Facebook, also size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to be a book, which is not "own work" Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image used as page header at https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/College---University/La-nature-dAlg%C3%A9rie-100839145295907/ bears copyright info. Our version does not. Seems as if it's been trimmed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in meta Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalimoun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images claimed as own work, but unlikely to be such. Foot ball logo, women at prayer, a group shot, and a lot of head shots of prominent men, all of small sizes, some with original transmission data suggestive of Facebook or Instagram. All of small sizes and so many styles, sharpness issues and so on, not really likely to be own work. User's remaining images are all landscapes and streetscapes. Closing administrator please review gallery due to recent uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rebeca Teixeira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images unlikely to be own work, more likely Derivative Works COM:DW. Old images "historico 1, 2, 3, 4" and newer with three different cameras are unlikely own works.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaucho1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seem like derivative works... series of flags with perhaps no reality? Seem like they came out of photoshop especially the one with the racist name.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An old photo with no source, claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albertvilarmasso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This group of files are images of people without actual sources. Some are claimed as own work, but clearly cannot be. The really ancient one is dated 2013! The headshots seem to have been uploaded to fill in pages, but do not have sources or correct license.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albertvilarmasso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This group of images is unlikely own work for small size and low quality, all of one topic - some kind of beverages and beverage packaging, so also COM:PACKAGE and COM:DW.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was unable to find the 4.0 license on the source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Too small, to poor quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be calligraphy not "simple geometry" Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As image only consist of simple calligraphic font text which may fall under ineligibility easily therefore its license may be changed to PD-ineligible as stated the image only consist of simple green and white coloured rectangles and text font of calligraphic Shahada which may also be adapted from flags like Flag of Saudi Arabia which already are in Public domain. Wallu2 (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Yes this flag is adapted signs from Flag of Saudi Arabia because the Saudi flag is the Sign of Wahhabism and Jamiat Ahle Hadith party is a Wahhabi-influenced party that's why they adapted a flag similar to Flag of Saudi Arabia. Syed Aashir (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liocamargo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, Illustrations, logos, identity photo, photo of outside somewhere. Seems more like a Point of View set of edits taken from elsewhere and claimed as own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work on this scout logo with picture of Moose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vansinor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unliklely own works. See many are named Copyright Dominique Sewane. We would need COM:OTRS permission to retain those. Others are from books, book covers, maybe a display, and some other much older photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dangthanhcong.pro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work on these sports logos and images. One has FBMD, others have transmission data. Only one has camera data, for that one COM:PRP.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is so small and so low quality that it's unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader did not create the depicted object. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tommxs nominated the file twice for speedy deletion. I create a regular deletion request, because I do not find a better version with black background. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The reasoning behind the speedy nomination appears invalid. Fry1989 eh? 16:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

site under copyright Caulfield (talk) 07:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has "All rights reserved.", OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by A.S.O.; copyright rules ignored; no own work Superbia23 (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:21, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "7ok9uLEALPi2FoWZgjO8", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "td2Fs0ucYmJIY8cL2ClD", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "hK778BztJtYWfOQLAFPH", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "A-3ojCeHdcJMIbAQP6_S", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "kH8Lm8EkvpHruz_9ty6c", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "t-FQLhxD2qQMeTT-z96S", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "FjajTGKCmAP6En2gwbZ3", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "UR7PFeNAvGoDqmhrcJZr", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "f4OQij0EmqaoDKtTNSHy", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:21, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no indication of Creative Commons license. MKFI (talk) 11:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A checkable source is needed to verify the date and the licence status. GeorgHHtalk   12:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size & Original transmission location code: "R9q1tYIw8AXPS4gpucq3", indicate this image was in and out of Facebook before here. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:21, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It isn't "Own work". Patrik L. (talk) 12:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:21, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 1982 sculpture by Anselmo Day-ag. Proof - https://m.facebook.com/656729927676590/photos/a.796399453709636/1744741422208763/?type=3 No freedom of panorama in the philippines

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No COM:FOP in the Philippines, unfortunately. Since Day-ag died in 1980 (source), it would become PD in the Philippines only in 2031 (1980+51) and in the US until at least 2051 (1980+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Howhontanozaz: it is 2078. Per COM:URAA. 1982+95+1, assuming the current FOP amendment that is still pending in Congress fails to become part of the law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: I thought the 95+1 calculation is only for "Anonymous works, pseudonymous works, works made for hire, and works where the date of author's death is unknown" per COM:Hirtle Chart when published from 1978-1989 or when it was solely published abroad from 1926-1977? Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Howhontanozaz: is that it? Nevertheless I'm pinging @Clindberg: whom I asked about URAA. In the meantime I'm restoring the undelete date category. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same case as the earlier nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Eagle of the North. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines, copyrighted works in public spaces like this cannot be used or shared in commercially-licensed images.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It’s not verifiable that flicker’s source is under CC Semi-Brace (talk) 02:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof has been provided that these images of SDR (public broadcasting service in Germany) have been released under a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license as claimed.

AFBorchert (talk) 07:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle der Dateien

Antwort des SWR am 5. Februar 2021 nach Anfrage meinerseits:

Sehr geehrte Frau ...,

haben Sie vielen Dank für Ihre Anfrage.

Im Anhang finden Sie eine Übersicht der uns vorliegenden Fotos. Ob es noch Schriftgut gibt, muss noch geprüft werden. Ich werde mich wieder bei Ihnen melden.

Viele Grüße

T. F.

HA Information, Dokumentation und Archive des Südwestrundfunks und des Saarländischen Rundfunks

SWR Südwestrundfunk Neckarstrasse 230 D-70190 Stuttgart

Tel.: 0711 929 - 120

T..F.@SWR.de

SWR.de

--Hohenzollernsche Lande (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a release under a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license as claimed. You need a release that conforms to COM:L. --AFBorchert (talk) 04:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia, closed by. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source site is published under license "© 2021 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved." Maybe the file violates authors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32409524/ "Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works."HunanZH (talk) 08:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia, closed by. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MKFI as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Press photo, taken from https://www.juhalaitila.fi/kuvat/ (https://www.juhalaitila.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/juha-laitila-4.jpg). MKFI (talk) 11:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing from speedy to regular deletion after uploader User:Nippala added source as the subject, and claimed to have received permission. Nippala, please have Juha Laitila send the permission via OTRS so it is official. Also the photographer information should be added. MKFI (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia, closed by. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist's heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in contact with the heir / uploader of the image and will explain the necessary steps to him. --Tkarcher (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per ticket permission. --Krd 08:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image de mauvaise qualité Ville de Monnaie (talk) 12:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author and the subject of the photo. And the photograph is not relevant anymore. From religious reasons mainly. New photo from 2020 was submitted by me yesterady. Kojot333 (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ya no lo quiero y no se como eliminarlo Sebas2133 (talk) 01:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de taille Ville de Monnaie (talk) 09:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Bild wurde vom Urheber (Fotograf) nicht freigegeben, es liegt eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vor. XVarrox (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image has not been approved by the author (photographer), there is a copyright infringement
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remark of M.nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich gebe niemals Genehmigungen, meine Fotos unter CC4 zu veröffentlichen, siehe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20-03-22-Berlin_Potsdamer_Pl-DSCF6441.jpg Ralf Roletschek 12:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist zwar bedauerlich, aber es war kein Problem Dein Photo im Banner auszutauschen. Es kann problemlos gelöscht werden.--Partynia (talk) 18:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Image is not in use (any more?) and of no educational value outside Wikimedia, because it is a "collage". --Ellywa (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:REDUNDANT to and low-res version of File:All in one with the Irish Canadian Rangers 199th Overseas Battalion LCCN2005696920.jpg and File:I0016178.jpg. P 1 9 9   13:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @User:P199 This file is not an exact copy (duplicate). This file is a different color variation and does not have a crease like one of your examples. Also, the file name is in the French language, which may make it found more easily by French speakers/ editors from Francophone nations and territories. In addition, this image is not the exact same document/ file because it comes from a different archival source. For future researchers, the knowledge that files of interest to their research are located within different GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) can facilitate their real-world, off-wiki research efforts. Low resolution or "Low-res" files sources/ GLAMs may in the future have higher resolution versions available. Having the low-res file here on Commons allows an editor to look for a newer/ higher resolution version. Editors should have more to choose from, not less (again this file is not exactly the same (redundant). Retention of various sourced files of similar, but not exact files helps researchers locate future files as yet to be digitized by these sources/ GLAMs. Regarding low-res... I noticed different image file in this same category and almost equally small sized file- should this other file in the same category also be nominated for deletion?
There must be 1,000s of similar categories filled with low, medium, high-res files. What are the various criteria for used to determine what file(s) must be deleted. I have read your referenced COM:redundant. It states, "Redundant or low-quality files only get deleted on a case-by-case basis after they are listed at Commons:Deletion requests. At deletion requests you will need to provide reasons why a particular file is inferior to the alternative version (for more information, see Commons talk:Superseded images policy)." This file is not a duplicate (exact copy), which process and tag is found here-[[13]] If there is a more specific Policy or rule about this, please let me know. If there is not a policy or guidance, I would like to start a discussion to help clarify this issue for myself as well as other editors. I have read a long discussion about deletion of superseded images [14] from the link found on the deletion policy page [[15]]. It appears there is a diversity of opinion. As volunteer editors with limited time to give to this wonderful project, I respectfully suggest that there are more compelling files to delete, such as copyright violations or not in scope, etc. Thanks --Ooligan (talk) 23:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, it is not an exact duplicate, and is of educational use because it show printing information. --Ellywa (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of ownership or permission to release under a free license. Copyright is held by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. CentreLeftRight 19:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Insufficient and presumptive. Fry1989 eh? 16:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 23:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC)  Keep The alleged copyright infringement and the deletion request is complete nonsense[reply]

  • First of all, this simple logo is not a copyrightable work anyway, because it does not have the required threshold of originality. There are tens of thousands of them at Commons (e.g. over 77,000 here or over 45,000 here) that only require the license building block [[Template:PD-logo|{{PD-logo}}].
    • So it doesn't really matter who created this work, because there is no copyright infringement here and so there is no reason to delete the file.
    • There were only errors in the description, but even these are no reason to delete the file.
  • Second, it was not the user @Luis1944MX: , but the bot @BotMultichillT: that entered the wrong claims in the description. This bot error can also not be a reason for deleting the file.
  • The false claims in the description and about the license have already been corrected in the meantime. Thus, the alleged copyright infringement or the deletion request is just warm air and nonsensical.--Bestoernesto (talk) 02:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak keep Close to the first example at COM:TOO Mexico (if not slightly more complex). -M.nelson (talk) 22:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as discussed, below threshold of Mexico, per COM:TOO MX. --Ellywa (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]