Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Wedding.jpg){kind=link}
,_photographie_depuis_le_col_du_Galibier.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![159 File:"Party Flag of the People's Democratic Socialist Movement Party".png](#File:"Party_Flag_of_the_People's_Democratic_Socialist_Movement_Party".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![189 File:Deepfyed meme "W".jpg](#File:Deepfyed_meme_"W".jpg){kind=link}
-face.jpg){kind=link}
![196 File:"Azərbaycan Narı" döş nişanı.png](#File:"Azərbaycan_Narı"_döş_nişanı.png){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/Joaquin pereyra Flickr
[edit]From a likely COM:FLICKRWASH account. The zero follower account was created in the last 24 hours with images easily found with reverse image search.
- File:Meddelin Night Skyline.jpg copyvio from here (2016)
- File:Purple Miami Skyline, Florida.jpg obvious copyvio[1]
- File:Sanhattan, Santiago de Chile.jpg copyrighted work by "Ant Clausen Photography Ltd", per metadata
- File:Bogota Skyline with Andes.jpg from https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/photo/bogota-city-view-from-above-royalty-free-image/596929406, eligible for speedy delete
- File:Clifton, Karachi Sky Line.jpg from https://www.flickr.com/photos/uroojqureshi/7204561530, all rights reserved
- File:Panhattan, Panama CIty, Panama.png copyvio from [2]
- File:Mexico City, Paseo de la Reforma Skyline.jpg copyvio from [3] (2017)
- File:Valparaiso, Chile sunset skyline.jpg copyvio from Getty Images
- File:Avenida de la Cultura.jpg from https://www.flickr.com/photos/15469934@N07/8752850252, all rights reserved
- File:Skyline of Beirut Bay.jpg from https://www.flickr.com/photos/laurent-tironi/29982713104, all rights reserved
- File:Durban Skyline.jpg
- File:Costa Verde, Lima Skyline.jpg, duplicate of File:City of Lima, Peru.jpg already on Commons
![[2]](https://www.tourismportfolio.com.au/cmsb/uploads/panama8.jpg){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 03:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Source-account added to COM:QFI. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - https://kskwroclaw.pl/kontakt/ Rthnbnnwertg (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 19:13, 11 Mai 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation © Ryszard Boduszek [4][5] Rthnbnnwertg (talk) 16:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
![[4]](http://wolf.ict.pwr.wroc.pl/ksk/tabor_ksk/Cysterna_MSLR215hl_554918_Roh_12-04-2013.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 19:13, 11 Mai 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate Nimatam (talk) 12:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & source not indicating free license. --Lymantria (talk) 06:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Saša Milivojev
[edit]- File:Milivojev Saša - AMMAN, JORDAN 2.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - AMMAN, JORDAN.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - BEIRUT, LEBANON.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - Casablanca, Morocco.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - COLOMBO, SRI LANKA.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - DELHI, INDIA.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - DUBAI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 2013.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - DUBAI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - GIZA, CAIRO, EGYPT.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - KATHMANDU, NEPAL.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - MALE, MALDIVES.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - MOMBASA, KENYA.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - NAIROBI, KENYA.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - PALM JUMEIRAH, DUBAI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - QURUM BEACH, MUSCAT, OMAN.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - TAJ MAHAL, AGRA, INDIA 2.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - TAJ MAHAL, AGRA, INDIA.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša - Zanzibar, Tanzania.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša in Doha, Qatar.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša in KUWAIT.jpg
- File:Milivojev Saša in RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA.jpg
- File:Sasa Milivojev 2021.jpg
- File:Sasa Milivojev.jpg
- File:Saša Milivojev 2021-4.jpg
- File:Saša Milivojev January 2021.jpg
Please remove, cross-wiki vanity spam by a large sockfarm (e.g. Sandra.serbia, Milivojevsasa, Diana-agnel, Vanesa.Barby, Maha-uae, Ana-africana). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bencemac (talk • contribs) 11:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom, oos. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete of course Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete though some could probably be good examples of massive photoediting. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (speedy). Ruthven (msg) 09:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: sd, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation © Arkadiusz Subczak - [6].Rthnbnnwertg (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Une personne présente sur la photo souhaite que celle-ci soit retirée (elle a manifesté son retrait directement sur le commentaire d'édition de la page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Experimentboy&oldid=182801366 ) Osylest (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Cette personne ne souhaite pas apparaître sur Wikipédia et sur cette photo. Elle doit donc évidemment être supprimée. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MiQuenDroid (talk • contribs) 19:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees with deletion. Unused personal photo, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jksolutions (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:NZD New Zealand.png
- File:HKD Hong Kong.png
- File:PHP Philippines.png
- File:Krone Multiple Nations.png
- File:MEX Mexico.png
- File:THB Thailand.png
- File:BRL Brazil.png
- File:TWD Taiwan.png
- File:MYR Malaysia.png
- File:AUD Australia.png
- File:PAB Panama.png
- File:SGD Singapore.png
- File:AED UAE.png
- File:CZK Czech.png
- File:IDR Indonesia.png
- File:ARS Argentina.png
- File:HRK Croatia.png
- File:CAD Canada.png
- File:UAH Ukraine.png
- File:VND Vietnam.png
- File:ZAR South Africa.png
- File:CLP Chilean Peso.png
- File:RON Romanian Lew.png
- File:PLN Polish Zloty.png
- File:BAM.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect structures in Category:DINCH
[edit]The uploader asks to have these incorrect structural formulas deleted. He replaced them by correct ones (see Category:DINCH ).
- File:DINCH-1 Formula V.1.svg
- File:DINCH-2 Formula V.1.svg → replaced by File:DINCH-2 Formula V.2.svg
- File:DINCH-3 Formula V.1.svg
- File:DINCH-4 Formula V.1.svg
- File:DINCH-5 Formula V.1.svg → replaced by File:DINCH-5 Formula V.2.svg
- File:DINCH-6 Formula V.1.svg → replaced by File:DINCH-6 Formula V.2.svg
- File:DINCH-7 Formula V.1.svg → replaced by File:DINCH-7 Formula V.2.svg
- Delete per nom & uploader's request. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GAndy as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright. Should be tagged with PD-textlogo.--Chianti (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per ru:Союз марксистов the organization is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The 3D shape of this chemical compound (Category:Chloramphenicol) is not planar like this. See File:Chloramphenicol-3D-vdW.png. Marbletan (talk) 18:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 23:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Files uploaded by S23115RPyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PENIS - this uploaders contributions are limited to penis photos
- File:Brazilian Waxed Male.jpg
- File:Erect penis 6 inches circumcisedII.jpg
- File:Erect penis 6 inches circumcised.jpg
- File:Waxed Penis.jpg
- File:Waxed Penis II.jpg
- File:Erection, 6" 29 Year Old 7.jpg
- File:Erection, 6" 29 Year Old 5.jpg
- File:Erection, 6" 29 Year Old 6.jpg
- File:Erection, 6" 29 Year Old 4.jpg
- File:Erection, 6" 29 Year Old 2.jpg
- File:Erection, 6" 29 Year Old 3.jpg
- File:Flaccid human penis (28 yrs old).jpg
- File:Erect human penis (28 yrs old, 6') II.jpg
- File:Erect human penis (28 yrs old, 6').jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_II.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; did not see this when nominating File:PicChanukaNP.jpg. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 07:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hưng Gọi Yến (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Private images.
- File:Nhà yến đà pyramid cho chim yến làm tổ.jpg
- File:Nhayendgh.jpg
- File:Hưng Gọi Yến Pimira.jpg
- File:Danhayen.jpg
- File:Hunggoiyen.jpg
SCP-2000 08:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
personal photo for non-wikipedian Faisal talk 10:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
No usefull NitishRawSinghania (talk) 10:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Not useful NitishRawSinghania (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Talk pages shouldn't be deleted. --Minoraxtalk 13:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Not useful NitishRawSinghania (talk) 10:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Not useful NitishRawSinghania (talk) 10:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr - YASER J. K. ALSAIDI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files, out of project scope. Not in use.
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 8.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 7.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 6.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 5.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 4.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 0.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 1.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI 2.jpg
- File:YASER J. K. ALSAIDI.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - [7][8][9]. I am not sure if the author has given his permission to use his photo. Rthnbnnwertg (talk) 13:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ellin Beltz. --Minoraxtalk 13:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - [10] Rthnbnnwertg (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ellin Beltz. --Minoraxtalk 13:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Inocencio Maguiuane Ugembe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:10. CHANGE YOUR MIND.pdf
- File:9. WHAT A MIRACLE!.pdf
- File:7. I LOVE YOU.pdf
- File:8. GET RID OF THE DARKNESS.pdf
- File:6. DON’T CRY.pdf
- File:3. GOD MEANS LOVE.pdf
- File:5. BLESSED.pdf
- File:4. ILLUSION.pdf
- File:1. PREACH THE GOSPEL.pdf
- File:2. SET ME FREE.pdf
- File:0. DON’T JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Poet priyanka author.jpg.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal and text-only image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 16:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D.SIKKANDAR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image gallery, out of scope. All unused.
- File:"IMG20201011123100.jpg".jpg
- File:"IMG20201011123102.jpg".jpg
- File:Img20201011123422.jpg.jpg
- File:SIKKANDAR.D.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 17:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles; missing, inconsistent, or transmission code in EXIF data. Also all unused photos of non-notable persons at non-notable event, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Ykdyjdnarcjasodo.jpg
- File:Carrixxxxxxxx.jpg
- File:Carrixxxx 10.jpg
- File:Carrixxxx 09.jpg
- File:Carrixxxx 08.jpg
- File:Carrixxxx 06.jpg
- File:Carrixxxx 05.jpg
- File:Carrixxxx 04.jpg
- File:Nsadafdgsefadvf.jpg
- File:Jhjhjhsjadheioasfnqwiao22.jpg
- File:Kjkjkdjskxjsikjhduiskjhfue.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Manipulated image used for vandalism at en:Medjed Sandstein (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Manipulated image used for vandalism at en:Medjed Sandstein (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Acyl-halide.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Source shows a CC-BY-NC license: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1453335482 Ytoyoda (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom; false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR NK, North Korean Banknotes cannot be uploaded. Ox1997cow (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom. Per Commons guidelines, DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Moon Bin.jpg Potatosweet (talk) 01:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Because it is uncertain the copyrights claimers. Potatosweet (talk) 01:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted prompt request by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
no free license (artist died 1987) + no OTRS ticket, license washing (at least partially) Mateus2019 (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted; derivative work; painting still under copyright by heirs of the artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
This flag was created by a user of the subreddit and discord server of "r/vexillology" by the name of Vulpes as a personal symbol. It was not designed with the intent of being a fascist symbol, and the continued use of it as such on Commons contributes to the misappropriation of this user's personal flag. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
-2021-05-11T02:38:00.000Z-File:Proposed_Flag_of_Ecofascism.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment The user who published this copyvio likely did not know of its actual status, as users on the Fandom website this Wikipedia file names as a source are required to confirm that uploaded work is copy-right free. This is a failure on that external site's part. It should probably be removed from Wikipedia, but it would be good to have the actual copyright holder confirm. Horizons_1 (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted. Dubious license claim, fantasy flag with no clear reason to be in Commons scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
pornografi asu Verdant1699 (talk) 03:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Kept. Human sexuality is within project scope; image in use in ja.w. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
copyvio- Obviously no own work created in 2020, Tineye gives over 300 matches since 2012}} Fl.schmitt (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete Not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be either CC-licensed or "own work". Sumanuil (talk) 05:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm not really sure about this file. Despite it not being fully copyrightable and having NASA as a source, both AFP and El Comercio protect their works under copyright. Can someone help out? ·×ald·es 05:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted No evidence of free license at sources. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Old picture Chasingstar (talk) 06:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplicated Chasingstar (talk) 06:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted fairly prompt uploader request; not used nor categorized. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1), see here dated 4/3/2021 C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I found an exact copy on Facebook as well. Robertsky (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Cyprès chCyprès chauve du lac inférieur du bois de Boulogne D210323 pneumatophore a.jpgCyprès chauve du lac inférieur du boCyprès chauve du lac inférieur du bois de Boulogne D210323 pneumatophore b.jpg
[edit]
I am the uploader, wrong name, unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 07:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom; typo redir unneeded. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Image has the license "cc-by-nd-2.0". I have confused that with another license now I know why it did not go to uploading. So it would have to be deleted. Riquix (talk) 14:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted upload error; not under compatible license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry tbo47 (talk) 14:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, not bad, certainly not so bad as to require deletion; one of series of photos illustrating the historic pulpit, at present the only one we have showing it at that angle. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Oeuvre exposée mais pas publique Dalloss (talk) 15:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted DW, copyright belongs to artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
No source on where the logo was obtained (impossible that the uploader was the creator of this logo). May also fail acceptable COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, dubious claims, out-of-scope -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Painter Charles Kiffer died in 1992. So CC license is wrong. GeorgHH • talk 18:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Painter Charles Kiffer died in 1992 but the owner of this drawing is the Alexandre Vassiliev Foundation (which I represent, I am the vice president) and we leave the rights of use of the image reproduction free. You will find on the link (https://ns3103723.ip-145-239-9.eu/pawtucket/index.php/Detail/objects/7254) the pen sketch by Kiffer in our collections. --CHRISTOPHE DUBOIS RUBIO (talk) 07:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted false license; copyright still held by heirs of the artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Firstly, there is no COM:FOP for sculptures in the US, so on this basis it is a copyvio. Additionally, the monument is not a work of the US government but of a private foundation, which had to be pay licencing fees for the use of MLK's image and copyrighted quotes on the memorial. Unfortunately, all of the photos in this nomination are not free for hosting on Commons.
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0004 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0005 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0009 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0010 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0013 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0015 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0016 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0022 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0086 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0093 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0096 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0101 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0131 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Plaque.jpg- File:MLK Jr Memorial 2.jpg
- File:MLK Jr Memorial.jpg
- File:MLK Memorial inscription wall.png
- File:MLK Stone of Hope cropped.png
- File:Obama family at MLK Memorial.jpg
- File:Stone of Hope 1.jpg
- File:Stone of Hope 2.jpg
- File:Stone of Hope 3.jpg
- File:Stone of Hope with sculptor Lei Yixin.jpg
russavia (talk) 12:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- I was a contributor for many of the original images, including photos I had taken myself. All of my photos were deleted, which helped me learn about the rule against publicly displayed works of art. At that point, I added only photos that were included in official U.S. Government websites (primarily, the U.S. Park Service site). I am quick to say I am not an expert, but try to learn, but I did have a conversation with one of the image experts at wikimedia commons who thought that using images from the government sites would be all right. Since then, I do see that some "original" photos by others have been added (including the one in the info box), with the U.S. Government photo I had put there moved to the gallery. I appreciate this editor's efforts to ensure that the photos that remain are allowed. If it turns out that even photos taken from official U.S. government sites are not allowed, then I will learn more.... NearTheZoo (talk) 12:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that the issue is that you need permission from both the sculptor (or whoever the copyright holder of the sculpture may be) and the photographer. The {{PD-USGov}} template only confirms that you have permission from the photographer, but you still lack permission from the sculptor. I hate it when images are deleted because of lack of FOP, but as I see it, there is nothing that can be done here. At least the US situation is much better than the French situation where you can't even take photos of recent houses... --Stefan4 (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Lack of FOP sucks..... It isn't pre-1978 so we can't use that trick either. I'm afraid nothing can be done here. Multichill (talk) 12:56, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's my understanding that the memorial is managed by the National Park Service, however, it's not the result of a federal government work. It's a bit of bummer that the memorial is like this. If there are images that are needed for use on articles on WP under non-free criteria, I would suggest grabbing them and uploading them to local projects under the NFCC if they can be use and comply with relevant criterias. russavia (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, I am sick of Wikipedia editors crippling the mission and functionality of Wikipedia by going around and nominating images, such as those listed above, for deletion out of bogus copyright infringement claims. First of all, the entire site and all of it's contents are owned by the Federal Government of the United States, in the context of this memorial, it is not that NPS allowed a private foundation to place their memorial in this location and now acts as its custodian. The memorial was authorized by congress, was paid for with private funding, and upon completion, was turned back over to be managed by the NPS. I have never seen any claims of copyright by the sculpture of the main statue, nor have I seen such claims from the stone masons who carved all the text. The rampant deleting of such images is pathetic, and seem to cripple the encyclopedic functionality of this entire site. Above all else, these images would be considered fair use no matter their resolution as they are not being used for any monetary gain and are used for educational purposes. I would like to know why it is that someone decided to start caring so much about the MLK memorial that they are always deleting images, but conveniently ignore the plethora of other DC Memorial (installed post 1978) pictures throughout Wikipedia. Better get on the case, I see some pictures over on the Korean War Memorial page that Frank Gaylord might want Wikipedia to pay for! </rant> Something Original (talk)
- It's my understanding that the memorial is managed by the National Park Service, however, it's not the result of a federal government work. It's a bit of bummer that the memorial is like this. If there are images that are needed for use on articles on WP under non-free criteria, I would suggest grabbing them and uploading them to local projects under the NFCC if they can be use and comply with relevant criterias. russavia (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
It's juste a plaque. Note a sculpture or art work. TCY (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Correct, but as it is also likely the work of a private foundation, the words on it are copyrighted. If the plaque, and the words on it, are the work of the US federal government, and this can be demonstrated, then we can remove it from this discussion. russavia (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- keep obama family one, on the border of "incidental use" in the landscape. Slowking4 (talk) 20:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, the Obama family seems incidental to that photo. The sculpture is central and more than de minimis. Kelly (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- centrality is irrelevant. we disagree on 'de minimis': wherever the president goes, he is the subject and the rest is backdrop, including statues. see examples at Commons:De minimis. Slowking4 (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vladimir Putin 22 February 2000-4.jpg would disagree with you on this count. russavia (talk) 16:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- centrality is irrelevant. we disagree on 'de minimis': wherever the president goes, he is the subject and the rest is backdrop, including statues. see examples at Commons:De minimis. Slowking4 (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, the Obama family seems incidental to that photo. The sculpture is central and more than de minimis. Kelly (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately delete, although I hope some of them will be moved to en.wiki to be used under fair use. Kaldari (talk) 09:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Nuetral -- Having been unable to satisfy myself that commercial use would be legally appropriate, I withdraw my prior recommendation (Fair use on projects that allow it would seem to be a good way to go, in this circumstance. See freely downlodable images by the US NPS at [11] ).
Keep- As the owner and operator of the memorial under Commemorative Works Act (40 USC 89) the United States government has widely published noncopyrightable images of portions of the memorial. Such acts being completely contrary to any claim of copyright, especially the assumed, unsubstantiated and inchoate claims that no one with any authority or reference has shown exist, the files are completely in the public domain. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)- Copyright or not depends on the creator of the memorial, not the owner/operator of it. It has been stated above that the memorial is a creation of a private foundation and not of the US government. See also the similar discussion at COM:VPC#I found it!!!. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- No. The memorial is established pursuant to public law and is public property. Wikimedia has no authority to tell the Federal government it is violating its own copyright laws, and has every right to republish the government's files which are in the public domain. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a quality picture. I honestly don't care if its a public or private project, it is still an important picture. Dudewiththebling (talk)
- Keep. I can't imagine that the owner of the statue's copyright (who is this, by the way?) would want to suppress photos of this statue which have already been published by the National Park Service. The purpose of the statue is to enhance the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., by erecting a highly visible outdoor monument in a place frequented by tourists. Nobody is going to suffer any revenue loss if this picture appears in a Wikipedia article, and such an article without any picture makes no sense at all. To understand the monument, the Wikipedia reader needs to know what it looks like. HowardMorland (talk) 13:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a quality picture. I honestly don't care if its a public or private project, it is still an important picture. Dudewiththebling (talk)
- No. The memorial is established pursuant to public law and is public property. Wikimedia has no authority to tell the Federal government it is violating its own copyright laws, and has every right to republish the government's files which are in the public domain. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Copyright or not depends on the creator of the memorial, not the owner/operator of it. It has been stated above that the memorial is a creation of a private foundation and not of the US government. See also the similar discussion at COM:VPC#I found it!!!. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- See also File:"hewed of the mountain".jpg. Kelly (talk) 15:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- I've added a note discussing Copyright of Images of Memorials in the US. Hopefully this note will help clarify some of the copyright issues surrounding this issue. You also might want to look at Copyright Status Of Images Hosted On US Government Websites. Pholm (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all None qualify for de minimis and are clearly copyrighted due to FOP in the US. Ryan Vesey Review me! 15:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a public monument or a private company grounds monument? Carlos Molina
Deleted: We have this situation with many Federal monuments and other works -- even official White House portraits of presidents and some US stamps and coins. The copyright is held by the creator of the work and both the law and our rules require us to honor it. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
See discussion above. The sculptures are under copyright by the designer. The words are under copyright by MLK, Jr., whose heirs are aggressive in defending the copyrights.
- File:20111008-OC-LSC-0144 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
- File:Closed Martin Luther King Jr Memorial, north (back) side, far view; Washington, DC; 2013-10-06.JPG
- File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial 2014.JPG
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial 01 - July 2012.JPG
- File:MLK Memorial Through the mountain of despair to the stone of hope.jpg
- File:PM Modi and President Obama at the Martin Luther King Memorial.jpg
- File:Stone of Hope seen through the Mountain of Despair.jpg
- File:View through the opening of the Mountain of Despair.jpg
_side,_far_view;_Washington,_DC;_2013-10-06.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep This takes FOP-enforcement much too far. This is a national monument for an assassinated hero, for heaven's sake, and no court anywhere in the United States is going to sustain a lawsuit based on publication of these images. We must have some common sense about this. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- That line of reasoning is explicitly prohibited by Precautionary Principle #1. Also, it's wrong. The King heirs have been aggressive about the copyright for his writings and speeches -- the builders of this monument had to get licenses. Finally, note that we treat the other national monuments on the Mall that have the same copyright problem exactly the same way. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, entirely the wrong way. Although nothing will probably come of it, I've asked at WMF Legal for someone to come here and explain that the generally overzealous enforcement of FOA for national monuments is unnecessary. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- That line of reasoning is explicitly prohibited by Precautionary Principle #1. Also, it's wrong. The King heirs have been aggressive about the copyright for his writings and speeches -- the builders of this monument had to get licenses. Finally, note that we treat the other national monuments on the Mall that have the same copyright problem exactly the same way. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps you did not see the cite above to the WMF legal team's commentary on the subject at Wikilegal/Copyright_of_Images_of_Memorials_in_the_US. Note, by the way, that the leading decision which upheld the creator's copyright is Gaylord, which covers the copyright on the Korean Veterans War Memorial, and which is, as it happens, adjacent to the MLK memorial. Gaylord specifically refutes your assertion that "no court anywhere in the United States is going to sustain a lawsuit based on publication of these images". Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Wikilegal/Copyright_of_Images_of_Memorials_in_the_US: Note: This page shares the Wikimedia Foundation’s preliminary perspective on a legal issue. This page is not final ... This page may not be accurate, and may fall out of date over time. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Also, Gaylord turned on a specific contractual issue, and is not generally applicable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Gaylord's contractual position was the same as most of the monuments and memorials that we have researched -- the creator almost always retains copyright. And note, by the way, that even if the contract transferred copyright to the government, it is still not PD, because Gaylord was not a government employee. The government owns and enforces copyrights on works created for it by others -- the Sacagawea dollar is a prime example. Unless you can prove that the MLK National Memorial contract explicitly transferred copyright to the Federal government and that the Federal government has chosen to put it into the public domain, we can't keep these images. And, as I noted above, the King heirs required that his quotes be licensed specifically for this purpose -- it would be extremely surprising to find that they had allowed those copyrights to become PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, you're contradicting what was said on the Meta page about the Gaylord decision, that an unusual situation prevailed. Gaylord is not generally applicable, especially since it was the decision of a single circuit and have never been reviewed by the Supreme Court.Template:ParabrThe notion that I cannot walk under Federally-owned land -- which means owned in some portion by me -- and take a picture of a Federally-funded monumnet of a national hero without getting the permission of an artist paid by the government *my government} to do the work, is perverse in the extreme, but what's more perverse, is that Commons bends over backwards to interpret the law in the most restrictive way possible, meaning that, potentially, this supposedly useful repository of images won't have a picture of the King Memorial in it for perhaps 100 years, depending on how long the sculptor lives.Template:ParabrSuch idiocies are what make this place so damn frustrating, as there doesn't seem to be a lick of common sense around the place. You, as an admin, are not required to use your powers to do anything at anytime, and yet you choose to use them to make the repository a distinctly less useful place, denying to our users images they can (and will) get from other places that aren't so frigging literal about everything.Template:ParabrThere's the law, and then there's what's right, and what you're doing is just not right - you don't have to do it, and yet you do. That just sucks.Template:ParabrI'm unwatching this page, as I'm sure the images will be deleted by another admin lacking in imagination and concern for how we service our readers, and I can't bear to see yet another memorial deliberately disappeared from the Commons because of overzealous enforcement of FOP. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Gaylord's contractual position was the same as most of the monuments and memorials that we have researched -- the creator almost always retains copyright. And note, by the way, that even if the contract transferred copyright to the government, it is still not PD, because Gaylord was not a government employee. The government owns and enforces copyrights on works created for it by others -- the Sacagawea dollar is a prime example. Unless you can prove that the MLK National Memorial contract explicitly transferred copyright to the Federal government and that the Federal government has chosen to put it into the public domain, we can't keep these images. And, as I noted above, the King heirs required that his quotes be licensed specifically for this purpose -- it would be extremely surprising to find that they had allowed those copyrights to become PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Also, Gaylord turned on a specific contractual issue, and is not generally applicable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Wikilegal/Copyright_of_Images_of_Memorials_in_the_US: Note: This page shares the Wikimedia Foundation’s preliminary perspective on a legal issue. This page is not final ... This page may not be accurate, and may fall out of date over time. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps you did not see the cite above to the WMF legal team's commentary on the subject at Wikilegal/Copyright_of_Images_of_Memorials_in_the_US. Note, by the way, that the leading decision which upheld the creator's copyright is Gaylord, which covers the copyright on the Korean Veterans War Memorial, and which is, as it happens, adjacent to the MLK memorial. Gaylord specifically refutes your assertion that "no court anywhere in the United States is going to sustain a lawsuit based on publication of these images". Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
You're ranting in the wrong direction. Complain, instead, to MLK's heirs, who aggressively defend the copyrights on his works, to the people overseeing this project who didn't bother to acquire the copyright to the sculpture from the creator, to the government, which rarely releases the copyrights it owns (witness the copyright for the Sacagwea dollar), and Congress, for not enacting broad FOP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry but Jim is correct. We can't hoste this files as he explained. Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial for previous cases/deletions.
- File:2015-06-20 17 37 20 Rock carving of Martin Luther King, Jr. at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington, DC.jpg
- File:Flickr - Shinrya - Martin Luther King Memorial (1).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in DC.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Jr.-Memorial.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial at night black and white.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial at night.jpg
- File:Looking Down.png
- File:MLK Memorial closeup1.jpg
- File:MLK Memorial, night.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~Kevin Payravi (talk) 23:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete Kevin is entirely correct. The sculptor holds the copyright and these images infringe on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial for previous cases/deletions.
- File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in early morning.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial Washington D.C. Spring.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial.jpg
- File:MLK Memorial Closeup.jpg
- File:MLK Memorial.jpg
- File:MLKjr Memorial.jpg
~Kevin Payravi (talk) 07:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial for previous cases/deletions.
~Kevin Payravi (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
These are photos of Stone of Hope (2011) by still-living artist Lei Yixin (1954–). Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in US for sculpture so these are derivative works of a work protected by copyright until at least 2089. See note at top of Category:Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial.
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2013650717.tif
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2013650720.tif
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Monument.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, Washington DC.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Monument on a Sunny Day.jpg
- File:MLK Memorial By Night.jpg
- File:MLK Memorial.jpg
—RP88 (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to previous cases/deletions
- File:Martin Luther King Jr. DC Memorial.JPG
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2013650718.tif
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2013650719.tif
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2013650721.tif
- File:MLK memorial.jpg
- File:SrA Jette Carr, USAF (10) (14325374979).jpg
- File:The Martin Luther King Memorial.jpg
- File:The Martin Luther King Monument ( dutch Angle).jpg
- File:Urban61 (39044503072).jpg
_(14325374979).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk 22:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
The sculptures here are under copyright. King's heirs aggressively defend the copyright to his words.
- File:Cherry Blossoms with MLK and Washington Monuments.jpg
- File:GNorton - MLK Jr Memorial & Cherry Blossoms.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Jr monument Washington DC.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in D.C..JPG
- File:Martin Luther King's Human Legacy.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (0a36d1c2-03dd-41b7-9979-5d8ccd8d7caf).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (13ba60c8-7008-4339-ba7d-285b0c29d88a).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (1f815e69-26c8-4561-8a3e-6a53962b8f22).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (36680f06-4b14-4432-8fdd-730fa8ef75e5).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (38bc6259-7cf5-4018-b23f-c2e204807f45).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (5849f8e6-a190-4b2e-9799-481a1e697137).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (6de160be-4d87-47cd-acf6-f6eccd9c07ee).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (9f131a0a-4085-4b0a-895a-0b6dc12cf189).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (b0488081-61a1-446e-b300-80362bc38f5d).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (f982cbdd-8bdf-4fc4-88e1-fd2fb2dcf19d).jpg
- File:MLK Memorial and Washington Monument 01 - 2013-04-09 (8635659048).jpg
- File:MLK Memorial and Washington Monument 02 - 2013-04-09 (8635659090).jpg
- File:MLK Memorial.jpg
- File:MLK Stands for Justice and Equality.jpg
- File:MLK-Nobel Speech.jpg
- File:MLKingmemorial.jpg
- File:MLKMemorialWashingtonDCObamaRousseff29JUN15.jpg
- File:Part of Martin Luther King memorial, Washington DC- Andy Mabbett - 2012-07-08.jpg
- File:SrA Jette Carr, USAF (1) (14508595851).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14508595851).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Agree with the need for deletion. I didn't see any that I would consider DM. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the images which don't show King's words, if that's the perceived problem. Have the King family lawyers contacted Wikipedia about any of these? If not, why the need to delete, and just move them to Wikipedia if that's a concern (I don't know why Wikipedia trusts Commons with images which, instead of being deleted, can be moved to the Wikipedia collection). Randy Kryn (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the ones that do not contain words. Reywas92 (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Previous DRs have held that both the words and the sculpture are copyright problems, because there is no FOP for art in the United States. – BMacZero (🗩) 18:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- This also involves the following files, which were uncategorized at the time of creation:
- – BMacZero (🗩) 18:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File:GNorton - MLK Jr Memorial & Cherry Blossoms.jpg and File:MLKMemorialWashingtonDCObamaRousseff29JUN15.jpg as de minimis
- Keep File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in D.C..JPG, File:MLK-Nobel Speech.jpg, File:Part of Martin Luther King memorial, Washington DC- Andy Mabbett - 2012-07-08.jpg and File:SrA Jette Carr, USAF (1) (14508595851).jpg as they do not show the sculpture.
- Delete the rest per nom. --A1Cafel (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in the US. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work copyright violations. There is no acceptable FOP for sculptures in the United States, and these freely-licensed images violate the copyright of the artwork's artist w:Lei Yixin.
- File:Detail on the MLK Memorial's stone of hope. - panoramio.jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial 2 (Washington) (30302710257).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial 3 (Washington) (44519505254).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial 4 (Washington) (44331180605) (cropped).jpg
- File:Martin Luther King Memorial 4 (Washington) (44331180605).jpg
- File:MLK statue 4 lo-res DSC00036 edited-2.jpg
- File:MLK statue 4 lo-res DSC00036 edited-3.jpg
- File:MLK statue 4 lo-res DSC00036 edited-4.jpg
- File:Southwest Washington, Washington, DC, USA - panoramio (38).jpg
- File:Southwest Washington, Washington, DC, USA - panoramio (84).jpg
- File:Statues of the MLK Memorial.png
- File:Visit to MLK Memorial (6266825842).jpg
- File:Washington02.jpg
_(30302710257).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(44519505254).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(44331180605)_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(44331180605).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom and previous. Derivative of work under copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Even if flickr reviewed, I don't think this can be retained here as it is a screenshot from Zillow. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Deleted derivative work by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Police are seeking information after two packets of bacon were stolen from a supermarket in Leyland © World Exclusive The Lancashire Evening Post - Our Lawyers are watching - Good as got him eh ? ! (32148826151).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Should not be retained since copied from Internet onto a flicker site and thence to here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Lancashire Evening Post - Burglary - Drugged Woman stole 2 ft electric dog (28761949623).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The Flicker uploader doesn't have rights to this screencapture from the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr uploader doesn't have rights to image depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Lancashire Evening Post Fire Disaster in Preston The legendary LEP typos - What is a grill plan ? © World Exclusive The Lancashire Evening Post - Our Lawyers are watching !! (8525299684).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr uploader doesn't have rights to this image which is from a newspaper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Lancashire Evening Post Wig Theft from a Ann Summers shop mannequin -Preston crime wave (8502835475).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr uploader doesn't have rights to this image which is from a newspaper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:By Chorley News Billboards - Pork Chop almost kills Chorley Man © World Exclusive The Lancashire Evening Post - Our Lawyers are watching !! (9411764090).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr uploader doesn't have rights to this image which is from a newspaper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no fair use on commons. Flickr uploader doesn't have rights to this image which is from a publication. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Newspaper cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
No indication of own work. Uploads seem promotional in nature. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted Claimed free license not seen at source website. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I did not find this license at source given Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I have posted this file incorrectly Maturmalaiabai (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Allisonpasechnick (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I agree that a table is better but it is in use atm. In use means in scope. If uploader abandon the article in progress or if the tables are replaced then we can delete. --MGA73 (talk) 10:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality microimage, the flag is available in better quality. Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 03:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality of stock pic, not an own work. Fl.schmitt (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
_Wedding.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Wedding.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
lack source and detailed information Famousruler 95 (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
_Wedding.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by JuTa at 05:29, 24 Mai 2021 UTC: Source of derivative work not specified since 10 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
_Wedding.jpg){kind=link}
Not a personnal work, the picture come from here : https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/71353975319160576/ (2012) Malvoört (talk) 07:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoldenKron (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
- File:אהרון פרנקל עם ראש הממשלה של ישראל בינימין נתניהו.jpg
- File:אהרון פרנקל עם ראש הממשלה בינימין נתניהו 01.jpg
- File:אהרון פרנקל עם בינימין נתניהו.jpg
- File:אהרון פרנקל, מאיה רות פרנקל ושמעון פרס.jpg
- File:Aaron Frenkel with Esther Hayut.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoldenKron (talk · contribs)
[edit]No metadata, unlikely to be own work as the uploader has a history of copyvio
- File:Prince Albert II of Monaco and Aaron Frenkel.jpg
- File:Aaron G. Frenkel with Prime Minister of Israel Naftali Bennett.jpg
- File:Aaron Frenkel and Yitzhak Herzog.jpg
- File:Aaron Frenkel and Reuven Ruvi Rivlin.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 11:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohanad Kh (talk · contribs)
[edit]This user has had numerous individual DR's of low-res images that all look like screengrabs. It is better to make one DR of all these uploads so that they can be considered together. Because taken together, we see a pattern of images with disparate sizes, quality, and styles, inconsistent or missing EXIF data. These can't be own works. To settle these ongoing DR's once and for all, the uploader is asked to provide proof (e.g. upload some of these images in high-resolution c/w EXIF data).
- File:Tayseer Al-Nuaimi.png
- File:Musa Al-Taamari.png
- File:د. معن القطامين 01 (cropped).jpg
- File:Bisher Al-Khasawneh 01 (cropped).jpg
- File:NaderalDahabi (cropped).jpg
- File:Hani Al-Mulki 2016.jpg
- File:بدر بن نادر المشاري.png
- File:Abdul Karim Khasawneh.png
- File:Othman Al-Kamees.png
- File:Saad Jaber.png
- File:Othman Quraini.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- yep, I Admit it, it was a big mistake to upload here, I should keep it for my self, just to know, I have the original for all these files (except cropped) and I modified resolution and removed EXIF intentionally, I could embarrass you by uploading all original files, but sorry, I'm not interested any more --Mohanad Kh (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Don't feel bad about this DR, it is simply the Commons procedure to address copyright issues. This is in fact your chance to prove me wrong. That won't embarrass me, I would welcome it... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WikiXscape (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not old enough to be PD: Credited to Leni Riefenstahl who died in 2003 and no evidence of free license at YT (and even if there was, it is unlikely that this YT channel holds the rights).
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhimmafilm1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]We need OTRS confirmation to know the uploader is allowed to provide the files under Cc license.
GeorgHH • talk 18:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Facebook or smaller images which seem to be here to promote a school, not as own work of uploader.
- File:Hajvery-university-pharmacylb1.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-computer.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-alumnist.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-quwwali.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-musicnig.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-hall.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-convocat.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-mou.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-library.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-pharmalb.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-classroo.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-classrmm.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-classrom.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-campusvw.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-campusvi.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-campusve.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-campusvv.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-view3.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-view1.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-view2.jpg
- File:Hajvery-university-entrance.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Triciclos De La Montaña (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook or smaller images with no metadata suggest not own work but copied from elsewhere.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Esta imagen proviene de la página "dominicanavuela" (https://dominicanavuela.com/la-desaparecida-y-casi-olvidada-fuerza-aerea-haitiana/), donde se manifiesta que el autor es Robert St. Vincent, vía LAAHS. Teobaldo Cairós Herrera (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Esta imagen aparece en la página "Curtiss P-36 Hawk (Mohawk)" (http://asasdeferro.blogspot.com/2015/05/curtiss-p-36-hawk-mohawk.html). Teobaldo Cairós Herrera (talk) 19:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Previous improperly filed request was: "il n a plus à faire ici" Johnj1995 (talk) 21:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
First original DR was:
- looks like a screenshot or a private image, out of commons:scope Migebert (talk) 13:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
,_photographie_depuis_le_col_du_Galibier.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_photographie_depuis_le_col_du_Galibier.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Source has a CC-BY-NC-ND license: https://www.photo-paysage.com/displayimage.php?album=217&pid=5442#top_display_media Ytoyoda (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
,_photographie_depuis_le_col_du_Galibier.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
,_photographie_depuis_le_col_du_Galibier.jpg){kind=link}
Logo startdecor.png Homesand (talk) 00:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Spurious deletion request, Homesand should be indeffed. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 00:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 00:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
According to the uploader's username, they are the person depicted in the photo. However, the copyright holder of a photo is its photographer, not the person depicted in it, and this photo is not likely to be a selfie. OTRS permission required. Ahmadtalk 02:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ибрагимов1005 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation. The person in the photo died in 2014.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep The user simply uploaded the photo without specifying the exact date, which is why it turned out that the photo was supposedly taken on May 3, 2021, although this is the first publication. No such photo was found on the Internet. I think that this is from a personal family archive (given that the uploader has a birth certificate of the politician), and most likely this person inherited the rights to this photo (although the true photographer is unknown). Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 15:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eldergriffin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation. Scan of a book page.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 02:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Russia does not have Freedom of Panorama for sculptures or monuments...such as this modern war monument. It only has FOP for modern buildings, bridges and dams. Leoboudv (talk) 02:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete Valid FOP objection, the photo title on Flickr indicates this is a '100th anniversary' monument, so obviously of very recent construction even without knowing the exact location. Also, the name of the photographer in the EXIF is not the same as that of the Flickr uploader, which makes it seem likely that person is only the author of the collage, not the original images, and thus the licencing is dubious. Revent (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator and Revent's points. Green Giant (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Is this the same object (not necessarily photo) as that of a deleted file? If so, then sorry. Russian FOP for non-architecture is noncommercial which is 
Not OK. Permission from sculptor or his heirs is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Directly uploaded the same deleted file without COM:UNDEL process, if the uploader do so again and again, feel free to report the behaviors to COM:AN/U or COM:AN/V to ask for a block. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: the uploader of the file in question (Dimetrius2015) is not the uploader of the first deleted file (Бархударян). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- But this may also caused by pre-downloading (before the last deletion), and intentionally uploaded it to make deletion semi-failure. In all ways, this file is not suitable for Commons. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Pre-publication of this (and more images of the same setting) on this 2012 site put the "own work" claim by the uploader into question. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploader has same name as subject, needs evidence of permission from the photographer pandakekok9 09:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Painting of en:Gabrijel Jurkić (died 1974). No permission. Template:FoP-Croatia can't be applied here since FoP is allowed only for "outer appearance of the architectural structure". Smooth O (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
1 image in this montage (bottom left) is likely unfree, as credited "Peruvian presidential press photo by Andres Valle via AP" and from site labeled as "© 2021, World Politics Review LLC. All rights reserved." -- Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- I had left a note saying I had gotten permission to explicitly use that file.Mausebru (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also, those other files are from flickr, and are free. What the heel were they deleted? They were free Mausebru (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Any honestly, WHAT IS COPYRIGHT? I don't know. Mausebru (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- I had left a note .. — Who gave you that permission? What permission exactly (wording?)? Where is the evidence?--Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Your other uploads from Flickr were deleted as they were sourced to a license-laundering account on Flickr; i.e. the Flick-account suggested the images are they own, when in fact they were stolen from other photographers; see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Joaquin pereyra Flickr for details. That is not your fault, but of the Flickr-account owner. --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- WHAT IS COPYRIGHT? — es:Derecho de autor. --Túrelio (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- The source of Vizcarra's photo states. "Peruvian presidential press photo by Andres Valle via AP". That means it wasn't the work of AP, but distributed by them. If the Peruvian presidency releases those files under a free license there is no problem for them to be hosted here. This other source says it is the work of JUAN PABLO AZABACHE/AFP/GETTY IMAGES. Then this one credits it to "Andres Valle/oficina de prensa de la presidencia de Perú, via AP". Such statement is repeated by AP itself [12].
Under Legislative Decree N˚822, Sexta Disposición Complementaria, Transitoria y Final de la (Law No 28131) put in place in 2003 and still in effect, "images of government officials or texts (legislative, administrative, executive or judicial) published by the Government of Peru are not subject to copyright protection and are in the public domain (Please refer to this link for the decree: https://www.indecopi.gob.pe/documents/20787/0/DL+822.pdf/f1ed8416-7438-1ff9-eab6-81fa4dcb7505).My bad, such law / decree does not mention works by the Government of Peru are in the public domain. This photo isn't, then. Delete --Kuatrero (talk) 03:15, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
derivative of content of depicted tableau, as there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in public space. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Historique de l'église de Niederhergheim.jpg
- File:Historique de la chapelle de la Vierge Beaumont.jpg
- File:Vitrail de l'église de Marcilly-sur-Tille.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
modern building from 2007,no FoP in Abu Dhabi / UAE 2.207.63.107 13:29, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in UAE Ralf Roleček 
13:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE Ralf Roletschek 18:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
No fop in abu dhabi Ralf Roletschek 10:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Porque já não detenho a licença do mesmo Clara Paredes (talk) 11:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 13:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Not in-use picture, probably for promoting this brand. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 13:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Not in-use picture, probably for promoting this brand (see the other two only files this user has uploaded). The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work, for sure! Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coat of arms of Hong Kong (1959–1997).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not really own work (the underlying photo). When was this first published, and who was its photographer? Is this {{PD-Russia}} compliant? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Looking at the source Flickr account, it's unclear how much of it is their own work and how much is work they grabbed off the web. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Image has the license "cc-by-nd-2.0". I have confused that with another license now I know why it did not go to uploading. So it would have to be deleted. Riquix (talk) 14:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
These two images of the same letter are out of COM:SCOPE. An uploader's plea to Wikimedia Commons users and administrators cannot change freedom of panorama status or outlook. Furthermore, with the proposed freedom of panorama provision now pending in Congress as of today, the utility of the content of these letters is diminished.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also bundle here the ff. files - all files at Category:Letter of Judge Florentino V. Floro to the Rector-Parish Priest of Marilao Divine Mercy Church and JRS Express receipts as out of COM:SCOPE
- File:5134Letters of the Philippines 03.jpg
- File:5134Letters of the Philippines 05.jpg
- File:5134Letters of the Philippines 06.jpg
- File:5134Letters of the Philippines 07.jpg
One file that I didn't include, File:5134Letters of the Philippines 04.jpg, has been transferred to Category:Letters of the Philippines by me, as a representative handwritten letter. But the rest are redundant files with no utility, and if the rest have been deleted, the entire category "Category:Letter of Judge Florentino V. Floro to the Rector-Parish Priest of Marilao Divine Mercy Church and JRS Express receipts" may become empty. See also a related DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Letter-Permit to-from Arnel F. Mendoza (Philippines). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Artist Clarice Cliff died in 1972, not in public domain before 2043. Culex (talk) 14:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I am not sure if the author has permission to use his photo. Other photos of uploader are violating copyright. This photo is probably done in this same time - [13] Rthnbnnwertg(talk) 14:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - [14][15].Rthnbnnwertg (talk) 14:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, and these letters didn't change FOP matter back then. One file, File:3981Letter Receipt Appropriate Action Feedback Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines 04.jpg, has been transferred to Category:Letters of the Philippines.
- File:3981Letter Receipt Appropriate Action Feedback Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines 01.jpg
- File:3981Letter Receipt Appropriate Action Feedback Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines 02.jpg
- File:3981Letter Receipt Appropriate Action Feedback Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines 03.jpg
- File:3981Letter Receipt Appropriate Action Feedback Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines 05.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
File does not provide an actual source for the image. The overall composotion is subject to copyrigt, even if the simple parts that make it up are not. A loose necktie (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploader has a history of uploading non-free content to Wikimedia Commons of this musical artist, EXIF data is suspicious for a photo that is supposedly someone's own work. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 15:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploader has a history of uploading non-free content to Wikimedia Commons of this musical artist, EXIF data is suspicious for a photo that is supposedly someone's own work. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MaximouSoft (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
clearly flickrwashed, uploaded by a single purpose flickr account with the same name of the subject and no real exif data Praxidicae (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
I disapprove of this file being marked for deletion because User:Praxidicae has made an unsubstantiated assertion regarding the photo and has not provided proof that the image is not accurately attributed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muchasz (talk • contribs) 03:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright https://www.tsg-hoffenheim.de/assets/Medien/Saison201920/Medien-Profis-19-20/e003061b70/georginio-rutter.png Remy34 (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright https://www.ogcnice.com/fr/equipes/pros/effectif/joueur/2856/nsoki Remy34 (talk) 16:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
logo under copyright Caulfield (talk) 16:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Logo of a state university. State universities don't fall under {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} public domain privileges, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:CCC-Official-Logo (JAMalahito).png. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michelle Grob (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate/inconsistent EXIF data (3 photos, 3 different cameras). Proven uploader of other people's work, see File:1907 neubad keller©Christian Felber DSC08988.jpg.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: cover of the album Refugee released in 1974. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Virtually identical to File:Osborne-Executive--Museum-Enter-6094719.jpg, except that this version is badly out of focus. No reason to keep the much weaker version. Ubcule (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Instagram photo uploaded by a puppet linked to marketing companies, aimed at spam on pt.wiki. The publisher usually forges sources and uses his own advertising pieces on Wikipedia, I do not doubt that he has falsified the license as well. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexandre Billy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own works. Little to no useful metadata. Two have "software google" the other two seem to be copied from elsewhere. Gallery is related to single topic.
- File:LG Complément d'enquête.jpg
- File:Upec-fac-droit.jpg
- File:Borey vu du ciel.jpg
- File:Vue aérienne de Borey.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, very small, JPG artefacts. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Outdated Flag Design Douuwwurunwuuzhe 19:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
![19:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/11#c-Douuwwurunwuuzhe-2021-05-11T19:12:00.000Z-File:"Party_Flag_of_the_People's_Democratic_Socialist_Movement_Party".png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
![19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/11#c-Missvain-2021-06-02T19:30:00.000Z-File:"Party_Flag_of_the_People's_Democratic_Socialist_Movement_Party".png){kind=link}
Outdated Flag Design Douuwwurunwuuzhe 19:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Metadata says "Author Sebastien Rande Copyright holder Sebastien Rande" Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
This looks more like a corporate brochure photo than something general public would take. No metadata. Could not find older or larger in use, perhaps the uploader could help with more information about it than "water quality". Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Recent artwork. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of code, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crazyharlem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, various sizes, different styles and also no metadata.
- File:2019 pubgm star challenge.png
- File:Honor of kings world champion cup 2020.png
- File:Shanghai lingshi road center.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyvio, reverse image search finds hits on 2 of the 3 images. Very unlikely user is copyright holder. Pbrks (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021051410004261 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 03:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Honor of kings world champion cup 2020.png” but not processed yet, ticket:2021052010001797. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:2019 pubgm star challenge.png” but not processed yet, ticket:2021052010001797. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Shanghai lingshi road center.png” but not processed yet, ticket:2021052010001797. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr uploader doesn't have rights to the painting shown. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of newsphoto. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of newsphoto. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr uploader doesn't have rights to this image which is a poster or pamphlet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be free of copyright, this band logo is not simple. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Tiny file, looks more like a promo shot than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Image of a size and quality indicative of facebook and contains a logo. Description seems to be promotional. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Despite surviving a prior nomination, this image has meta data which suggests it's copyright. Author Vivek Das Copyright holder Vivek Das Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Despite surviving a former mass nomination, it would appear this image is copied from elsewhere as it is very small of low quality and contains JPG artefacts. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Facebook size and quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Very small, low quality out of SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work very small and of low resolution Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be text. No source, no need to keep it. Could be replicated by typing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures 213.87.129.213 20:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Instagram photo uploaded by a puppet linked to marketing companies, aimed at spam on pt.wiki. The publisher usually forges sources and uses his own advertising pieces on Wikipedia, I do not doubt that he has falsified the license as well. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 20:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be a sticker, not own work. Derivatives of online stuff are still COM:DW Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This is not a real vector image; it's just a PNG embedded inside an SVG. I've uploaded that PNG as a separate file at File:2019 MI STARS LOGO.png, so there's no longer any reason to keep this misleading file. IagoQnsi (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Too complex, exceeds threshold of originality IagoQnsi (talk) 21:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Used in a draft om en WP that is going nowhere. User is blocked asa spammer. IN addition, Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I have posted this file incorrectly Maturmalaiabai (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
cr violation -Zai- (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo. Looks like the counry of origin will be Luxembourg, but not sure how this fits into COM:TOO Luxembourg. It's borderline in the US but I'm ever so slightly leaning non-free. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo. Free in the US, unknown country of origin, could not find this used anywhere. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Used for vandalism only; zero value on any project. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 23:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
![23:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/11#c-Ohnoitsjamie-2021-05-11T23:59:00.000Z-File:Deepfyed_meme_"W".jpg){kind=link}
- Isn't it used for the page on memes? I fail to see how it's used for vandalism. AgeOfPlastic ( talk) 12:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep.
Speedy keep: its used on English and Bulgarian Wikipedia to represent a modern absurd deep-fried meme. Even if it wasn't, it wouldn't be vandalism and its not. -- YavBav09 (
talk)
12:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)- Keep As stated above, this file has value on the English and Bulgarian Wikis as an example of a deep-fried meme and there's no evidence that it's being used for vandalism. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep What vandalism exactly? There's no current vandal file usage visible in the list. Instead, the list shows constructive usage on two wikis. @Ohnoitsjamie: has apparently not even read the usage log as both arguments are contradicted, this feels frivolous and only based on "funny image bad". Gaioa (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
![19:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/11#c-Missvain-2021-06-02T19:45:00.000Z-File:Deepfyed_meme_"W".jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by User:Zul Alfarisi
[edit]- File:20140622-lindaweni-fanetri.jpg
- File:Mia audina.jpg
- File:Mia audina .jpg
- File:Ardianto.jpg
- File:Alfian.jpg
- File:Maria Febe.jpg
I do believe that those images doesnt belong to Zul Alfarisi. For example: File:20140622-lindaweni-fanetri.jpg belong to KOMPAS IMAGES/KRISTIANTO PURNOMO see: Fanetri in kompas.com. Stvbastian (talk) 00:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
-face.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-face.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by דגש as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It's a bear from a movie. How exactly is this a free image ???
Keep The photo appears to be from an exhibition, not a screenshot from a film or any copyrighted material. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
-2021-05-11T02:31:00.000Z-File:Dobby_(Harry_Potter)-face.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - Even if it's from an exhibition, it very likely is copyrighted material and we do not have permission to have it in Commons. Better to be safe than sorry. Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
-face.jpg){kind=link}
Photo de Brigitte Lacombe déposée par l'utilisateur Cgarçon. Le statut de la photo ne me semble pas clair Bertrand Labévue (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no free license at named source. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo avec un beau copyright en haut à gauche Bertrand Labévue (talk) 15:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Image non libre Bertrand Labévue (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Metadata reads Author Ron Bijlsma Copyright holder RBP Ron Bijlsma Photography... needs COM:OTRS to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
It's NOT a state medal or decoration, therefore, it's not a PD. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
![22:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/11#c-Nanahuatl-2021-05-11T22:16:00.000Z-File:"Azərbaycan_Narı"_döş_nişanı.png){kind=link}
Strong keep: ref. 1, ref. 2, ref. 3, ref. 4, ref. 5, ref. 6, ref. 7 In December 2018, "Azerbaijan Pomegranate" badge was established by the Association with the consent of the Office of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The main purpose of the establishment of this badge is to reward the persons who have contributed and served in the development of pomegranate growing, Association activity in the Azerbaijan Republic.
History "Azerbaijan Pomegranate" badge was established by the order of the chairman of the Association of pomegranate producers and exporters of Azerbaijan No. 01/2018, dated 3 September 2018 to reward the persons who contributed to the development of pomegranate growing. Patent and Trademark Expert Center of Intellectual Property Agency of the Azerbaijan Republic accepted the badge for examination on 31 January 2019.
Aims and objectives The main purpose of the creation of this badge is to maintain the economic, cultural and social importance of the pomegranate by awarding the people who contribute and pay attention to the Azerbaijani pomegranate and services and work in the activities of the Association of Pomegranate Producers and Exporters (PPEAA).
Establishment of the "Pomegranate Narcissus" is fully compliant with the Charter of ANIA and serves the following tasks:
- to support and promote measures undertaken by state and non-state bodies in the area of economic and social development;
- to help increase productivity in poultry farms;
- rewarding individuals engaged in awareness-raising and promotion activities on pomegranates;
- According to the "Azerbaijan Pomegranate" badge civil servants, businessmen, social activists, journalists, scientists, and cultural figures who are involved in pomegranate development can be awarded this badge.
Production In connection with the production of badges, PPEAA applied to the Office of the President of Azerbaijan Republic by letter dated 2 September 09-2, 018, dated 5 September 2018. With the approval of the department, Azersuvenir LLC manufactured the «Azerbaijan Pomegranate» badge in November 2018.
Description The industrial pattern of the "Azerbaijan Pomegranate" badge is characterized by a plate for fastening clothes, a connecting element, a hanging element with artistic and decorative components on its surface. The perforated plate of the badge is fastened with a hanging element and a connecting ring. On the opposite side of the sink, there is a fixing element.
In the center of the badge, there is a multi-pointed star in the form of detachable Rays, in which the framed circular element is located. The signboard of the badge is made of oblong rectangles with an elongated horizon. The lower part of the board is decorated with a plant ornament. The two branches are performed in such a way that they are combined with a transverse plaque, decorated with symmetrical eyebrows. The middle of the lavatory is covered with enamel of red color. Stylized varnishes, consistently placed on both sides of the lavatory, are covered with a mine of green color.
The multi-beam star is made of metal of yellow color. The edges of the star are worked out in the form of sharp angled Tilly elements. The central element, which is circular, is framed in the form of a stylized pomegranate with gold-colored metal in the form of a bell. In the center of the badge with a red background there is a picture element of red, blue and green in the form of three leaves and a stylized inscription "PPEAA". On the opposite side of the hanging element is written the words Association of Azerbaijani pomegranate producers and exporters. Each badge is individually numbered by "Azersuvenir" LLC starting with the number ”001".
The diameter of the tab is 40 mm, 8-pointed star, colors of the Azerbaijani flag on pomegranate mines, 3 ruby stones, pomegranate figures, the green leaves of the pomegranate tree, the spike and the logo of the Azerbaijani Pomegranate Producers and Exporters Association are engraved on the sign with gold. --Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
-2021-05-26T19:09:00.000Z-File:"Azərbaycan_Narı"_döş_nişanı.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - All of the above is interesting, but not relevant. It is a medal awarded by a private association and is therefore copyrighted. The copyright may be held by the creator of the design or by the association, but in either case we need a free license from the one who owns the copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
![21:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/11#c-Jameslwoodward-2021-06-09T21:01:00.000Z-File:"Azərbaycan_Narı"_döş_nişanı.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Guarapiranga as Copyvio (copyvio). It is not. See the license tag I put on it: Template:PD-chart. It applies. This is a basic statistical chart. See: Commons:Threshold of originality#Charts. Timeshifter (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Commons:Threshold of originality#Charts lists four charts that have been deemed ineligible for copyright protection, none of which is this one. It doesn't state any policy that would apply to it. Guarapiranga (talk) 00:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Commons:Threshold of originality#Charts. Look at the first chart. It is a bar chart. Also, look at Category:PD chart. Also, look at my evolution on the issue. I used to think all charts were copyrighted. I was wrong. Not the first time I have been wrong. :)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:UNODC definition of homicide.png
- Commons talk:Threshold of originality/Archive 1#Does this chart pass the threshold of originality?
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Federal Funds Rate and interest rates.png
- Commons talk:Threshold of originality#Bobby Glushko communications
- --Timeshifter (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also, look at my evolution
- I'm sorry, your evolution is not policy. -- Guarapiranga (talk) 09:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Who said it was? Policy is policy. It is separate from my evolution or yours. --Timeshifter (talk) 12:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- There is no copyright here -- this was almost certainly created by Excel or other automatic software. No one hand draws bar charts any more and even if it were hand drwan, it is not clear it's past the ToO. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Theres a higher resolution image available (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TUS_Schild.jpg) 194.8.192.162 08:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --Achim (talk) 12:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Redirect could be deleted. Original is not used, neither is the redirect. Nordat (talk) 12:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: use of the Nike Logo and slogan CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per above and dubious in-scope usefulness (vanity mashup of logos, unused, uncategorized since 2015). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close (admin deleting the file hadn't closed the request). --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Makino hidekazu 2019.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021060210011844. --miya (talk) 00:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 00:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 09:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:KiyonobuItakura2013.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021060210011862. --miya (talk) 23:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 00:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Zblace as no license (No license since) Zblace (talk) 18:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Mistake made on upload... Zblace (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
It seems the uploader is the subject of this photo. COM:OTRS permission from the photographer (not the uploader or the subject or the owner) of this image is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Non.je suis le propriétaire de cette photo — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.113.1.240 (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobautista 1
[edit]Collection of advertisement and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:02 Gerry.jpg
- File:Banner 03.png
- File:Gerry @ Online Crib Office.png
- File:Online Crib Operations.png
- File:Vicentpix.jpg
- File:Online crib.png
- File:Ger04.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobautista 2
[edit]Promotion. See also w:User:Gobautista.
Juggler2005 (talk) 08:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion Blatant copyvios as well as spam. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobautista 3
[edit]Likely not own works, images readily found on Internet. Uploader has a history of copyright violations.
- File:Maqueda Channel Bicol.jpg
- File:PAGASA Doppler radar Station.jpg
- File:Virac Airport.jpg
- File:CSU Main Building.jpg
- File:CSU Wall of Topnotchers.jpg
- File:CSU.jpg
- File:Catanduanes State University CSU.jpg
- File:Barangay Banlic.jpg
- File:WalterMart Cabuyao City.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobautista 4
[edit]Not own works: screengrabs, already published on the internet prior to upload date. Persistent copyright violator.
- File:Municipal Hall of Viga.jpg
- File:Catanduanes capitol.jpg
- File:Abaca Festival Dance Competition.jpg
- File:Catanduanes Abaka Festival.png
- File:Abaka Festival.jpg
- File:Catanduanes - Binurong POint.jpg
- File:Catanduanes - PAGASA Doppler Radar Station.jpg
- File:Caramoran, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:San Miguel, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:Pandan, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:San Andres, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:Panganiban (Payo), Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:Gigmoto, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:Bagamanoc, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:Baras, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:Bato, Catanduanes Official Seal.png
- File:New Virac Airport Airside.jpg
- File:New Virac Airport Landside.jpg
- File:Ph seal Virac Catanduanes.png
- File:Rizal Viga Seal.png
- File:Catandungan festival Logo.jpg
- File:Lolong Point Lighthouse - Panay Island.jpg
- File:Palumbanes.jpg
- File:Palumbanes Islands.jpg
- File:Palumbanes Catanduanes.jpg
,_Catanduanes_Official_Seal.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobautista 5
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:CSU - University Seal.png
- File:Brgy Rizal, Viga Official Seal.png
- File:LGU-VIGA Catanduanes PHL Official Seal.png
- File:San Jose Oco, Viga Official Seal.png
- File:Burgos, Viga Seal-official-final.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 06:37, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobautista 6
[edit]Metadata indicates these as sourced from "www.gobautista.net". While the website may be operated by the uploader himself, it is no longer accessible today, and it is unsure if his website is licensed under CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, or PD licensing (some rights reserved or no rights reserved). If his website was licensed under "all rights reserved", then it is unfree (meaning these cannot be reused commercially, thus incompatible with COM:Licensing).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gobautista 7
[edit]Likely another set of problematic uploads. Uploader has been warned multiple times about uploading either not own work images (copyvios) or, images previously published somewhere even if those are his own photos (user seems to avoid uploading original photos).
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Konstantin Chernenko
[edit]unlikely to be own work
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Photo of Chernenko from the party ticket
[edit]Page of the Soviet party ticket is PD-RU-exempt. The photo cut from this page is not PD-RU-exempt.
- File:Konstantin Chernenko (retouched).jpg
- File:Черненко Константин Устинович партийный билет (touch-up).jpg
- File:Черненко Константин Устинович, партийный билет (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. If the whole document is in the public domain in the US, the creator of any derivative work made from that document, such as these images, may also disclaim any rights they have (which in this case is pretty much none, as it is simple retouching and image processing), and dedicate that derivative work to the public domain. -- The Anome (talk) 15:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- I understand, but in this case, something else is being discussed here. The photo may be protected by copyright by default (for example, the copyright could belong to the photographer or the CPSU). Only the entire stamps/documents are in the public domain, and not any cut-out objects located on them. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 08:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)