Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
link provided makes no mention of this being free use, most likely copyrighted 47.223.78.205 02:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete - COPYRIGHT 2021 STATE OF MICHIGAN. --E4024 (talk) 02:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The Government of Argentina removed the CC-BY-4.0 license on 22 October 2020. The CC license appeared on 21 October 2020 for the last time. So images published on/after 22 October 2020 is not acceptable on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Redirected to File:Primeros vacunados en Argentina 01.jpg(non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 13:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- The licence of Argentina Gov currently is Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License (read on the website), so the photos are free for use. Marcia Beatriz Einsfeld (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Metadata says "© Andy Lloyd www.andylloyd.photography". Unless the uploader Sdsinglespeeder can verify that they are Andy Lloyd, this is likely to be a copyright violation. Kaldari (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - per above. --E4024 (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I have incorrectly setup this file as document instead of a page. I will use the page editor instead AvCommPL (talk) 03:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
License laundering by user. Uploaded himself to Flickr.
GoEThe (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 17:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Begründung'' }} MAmberg (talk) 21:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Possible derivative copyvio of https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/alfred-francis-russell-nee-to-usa-and-s-is-moved-to-liberia-news-photo/89868982 Zppix (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Zppix (talk) 04:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
The word 'Tastsinn' is a singulare tantum, see Wiktionary:Tastsinn or Duden:Tastsinn, 'Tastsinnen' doesn't exist 94.134.102.11 22:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't noticed, that I wasn't logged in, I requested deletion myself. --Jeuwre (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed and deleted. Even nom plural would be ...sinne, not ...sinnen. --Achim (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Prince418 (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is published on Wikiart as "Fair Use". Daraku K. (talk) 02:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is published on Wikiart as "Fair Use". Daraku K. (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is published on Wikiart as "Fair Use". Daraku K. (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is published on Wikiart as "Fair Use". Daraku K. (talk) 03:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image has been published as "fair use" in the English Wikipedia.(en:File:François_Villon_(film).jpg) Daraku K. (talk) 04:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Image posted on the stock photo site "Age fotostock". The image is licensed under a "Rights Managed" license. Daraku K. (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Image stolen from the official homepage of "TVR Moldova".
Reference: http://tvri.tvr.ro/fran-ois-villon-sambata-si-duminica-la-tvr-moldova_17749.html Daraku K. (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is a plagiarism from the Japanese automotive information site "Web CG" (https://www.webcg.net/articles/gallery/36228#image-1).
Web CG prohibits unauthorized use of content for purposes other than private use or citation (https://www.webcg.net/list/info/right_privacy). Daraku K. (talk) 04:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is a plagiarism from the Japanese automotive information site "Response" (https://response.jp/article/2018/08/27/313349.html).
In addition, there is a notation at the bottom of the relevant web page that "当サイトに掲載の記事・見出し・写真・画像の無断転載を禁じます。(Unauthorized reproduction of articles, headlines, photographs, and images posted on this site is prohibited.)" Daraku K. (talk) 05:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is a theft from the Bugatti official website (https://www.bugatti.com/fileadmin/_processed_/sei/p572/se-image-c8cc724e86e5ab2dfa92b334f5df1ae3.webp). Daraku K. (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is a plagiarism from the web site "CLASSIC DRIVER" (https://www.classicdriver.com/sites/default/files/styles/colorbox/public/article_images/04_bugatti_lavoiturenoireatlantic.jpg). Daraku K. (talk) 05:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is a theft from the Bugatti official website (https://www.bugatti.com/fileadmin/_processed_/sei/p426/se-image-6e3d9c499bb898cecc5723015ca97b69.webp). Daraku K. (talk) 05:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sobinov Monument In Yaroslavl.jpg. Russian FOP is for buildings only and doesn't include public sculptures and monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a picture of identifiable children/teenagers, taken surreptitiously and/or without consent at a coffee shop. Whether it should fall under COM:DIGNITY is unclear, but it seems like something that raises COM:PEOPLE problems regardless. It is also a rather low quality picture, despite being in use (at the moment). The original Flickr upload's description is also a little disturbing regarding the photographer's perspective. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a 'candid shot' (read - taken without consent) of identifiable minors. The photo quality is poor, and I have to wonder what encyclopedic value a picture of a bunch of teenagers adds to the enwiki article on youth culture anyway. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. And I can't say I'm an expert on how the Flickr Upload Bot does its business but if this is what we can expect I'd say this needs looking into. Merely existing and having the right license isn't a reason to upload creepshots. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
derivative of non-free content (Overwatch merchandise) FASTILY 00:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Seems to be a vanity upload. We have tons of image in Category:Flaccid and erect human penises in comparison (131 files), so the bar for educational value is high. There's no need to see the whole person, much less wearing cool sunglasses. See also COM:PENIS. Kaldari (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Agree; Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 01:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope promotional material
- File:Wael Tsar Logo .png
- File:Wael Tsar Official.jpg
- File:LOGO WTT.jpg
- File:Logo Wael Tsar.jpg
- File:Wael Tsar.jpg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Advertisement content, autopromotion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused poor quality photo of unidentified field. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused signature of unidentified person. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photoshopped image of non-notable group, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christianinthelaw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Half-Way-House-Residents.gif
- File:Graduation---Philemon-Kenya.gif
- File:Raphael,-resident-with-Ben,.jpg
- File:Kelvin-in-Athea-Prison.gif
- File:AG-in-Kenya.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oscar fotógrafo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works but scans of existing photos, missing essential info. And not notable.
- File:Raul joven.jpg
- File:Raul toledo.jpg
- File:Raul letonia.jpg
- File:Raul reunion.jpg
- File:Raúl Lozano Lima-Perú.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:10, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nestor Ivan Torres (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: inconsistent sizes, quality, and EXIF data.
- File:Rayperfil.jpg
- File:Ray entrevista discurso.png
- File:Ray discurso.jpg
- File:Ray cabildo.jpg
- File:Lenin volanteo.jpg
- File:WP 20131008 010 (1).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused fuzzy low-res photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused group photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of nondescript tiny worm, no educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res graph, no context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RRJMManpower (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused corporate logo and promotional image, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded incorrect pdf file Ecritures (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, unused. --Common Good (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
.. unfortuanetly uploaded twice, please delete - Thank you! Naturpuur (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, unused. Better version: File:Evangelisches Gemeindezentrum Feffernitz, Kärnten 05.jpg. --Common Good (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
fälschlich hochgeladen MAmberg (talk) 20:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, unused. --Common Good (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Schaltplan fehlerhaft MAmberg (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, unused. --Common Good (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, per Exif taken by at least two different photographers.
Didym (talk) 20:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyvio- “Getty Images” in the name of the file. Larry Hockett (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete very unlikely own work. Elli (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Metadata states this is work of Dick Darrell for Toronto Star, dated 1980-03-05. Mindmatrix 00:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've re-tagged it as copyvio, as it is a copy of this Getty Images photo. Mindmatrix 00:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 12:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal drawing. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 21:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Its mine-Pugsleyfan69420 (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from http://www.hmc.ox.ac.uk/people/professor-jane-shaw/ TSventon (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Njd-de as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: file=Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Award.jpg|reason=later upload
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, replaced by jpeg version. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Njd-de as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:MotherTerresa Award.jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, replaced by jpeg version. --Wdwd (talk) 12:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sreejithk2000 as no permission (No permission since) NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyright violation. The copyright is owned by DC Comics --Sreejith K (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cabayi as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mattbr as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: This image was used by the uploader (Bbasilico (talk · contribs)) on a now-deleted draft article on the English Wikipedia (en:Draft:Brian Basilico). This is a personal image of a user who has no constructive global contributions and the file is therefore out of Commons:Project scope. The image also appears to be from a professional photoshoot; if the image is kept please can the uploader, via Commons:OTRS, provide further details to confirm this is their own work or that the copyright holder has released the image under the stated license. mattbr 07:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
vandalism Aitorembe (talk) 23:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, image from facebook. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Takhirgeran Umar as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: File status is not known. Loader is not the author AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This image seems to be unrelated with the title and description; also not educationally useful Twotwofourtysix (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
vandalism Aitorembe (talk) 00:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism Aitorembe (talk) 00:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - smaller copy of File:Brother against brother.png. (Discuss there if you wish.) E4024 (talk) 19:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism Aitorembe (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Alternative history/fake election map - out of scope. Elli (talk) 01:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
The image was taken before Ossoff took office. The image has been used in articles dating back to September 2020 and even October 2020. No proof this is in public domain. Stalin990 (talk) 03:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- This photo can be seen on Ossoff's Congressional Biographical Directory page. I did a Google search for it this morning, and other places where it's available include: Jon Ossoff says federal government deserves 'F' for handling of COVID-19 pandemic"; and "Atlanta Press Club to host Georgia Senate runoff debates". I didn't do anything special when I saved it from the Congressional Bio site, so if there's a question or concern, I don't know how to respond. That said, it sure seems to me that if it's on the Congressional Bio site, it's in the public domain.
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Carl Ha (talk) 03:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Carl Ha (talk) 03:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Carl Ha (talk) 03:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of an online educational company. Little educational value, Richard Avery (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained diagram. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
alleged photographs of Morgellons disease symptoms
[edit]- File:Bacterie 10.jpg, File:Parasiet0186.jpg, File:Worm0074.jpg, File:Worm34.jpg and other files by User:Lifenext in Category:Morgellons
- File:Morgellans-Sample from author.jpg, File:Morgellans-Samples LargeClump 16-01-2015.jpg, File:Morgellons - Coccon like structure.jpg, File:Morgellons - epidermal tissue from author.jpg, and other files by User:Rodroger in Category:Morgellons
These images were uploaded by unknown users without indicating any sources claiming that they show symptoms of the so-called "Morgellons disease", which is scientifically regarded as a so-called delusional parasitosis, see en:Morgellons. This means that the photos are possibily doctored and/or show something entirely different, meaning that they are out of scope for Commons. --Gnom (talk) 14:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:10, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lotte Wubben-Moy
[edit]Appears to be a part of a photoshoot by the NCAA ahead of the 2019 NCAA tournament. See https://www.instagram.com/p/B5yaSSpJohG/ and https://www.instagram.com/p/B5tX7dJJ3CT/. While the photo is high-res, it's missing the camera EXIF data and a UNC logo is stamped on the uncropped version. Doubtful that this is a freely licensed work.
- File:Lotte-unc-womens-soccer-2019-12-10-t-16-25-18-832-z (cropped).jpg
- File:Lotte-unc-womens-soccer-2019-12-10-t-16-25-18-832-z.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Professor Adail (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Vanity pic by non contributor on rejected vanity draft on en WP. Out of scope. No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused random image of nondescript clouds, no context, no educational value, out of scope. Numerous better alternatives already on Comomns. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep OSE is not a Commons deletion rationale. The photograph is illustrative, has been hosted without issue for 7 years, is from an established good public domain source, and is of good resolution. --Fæ (talk) 06:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- also file:In Florence.jpg
Small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. Nonsense categories. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - indeed copyvio from here. --Lymantria (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
The image is published on Wikiart as "Fair Use". Daraku K. (talk) 04:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
The image is what has been plagiarized from personal blog (https://ameblo.jp/kai211168/entry-12145618910.html). Daraku K. (talk) 05:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
The image is what has been plagiarized from personal blog (https://ameblo.jp/kai211168/entry-12145618910.html). Daraku K. (talk) 05:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 07:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Useless redirect pager after renaming Massic80 Contattami 19:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Logo antiguo no es el actual ProbogotaRegion (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
no es el logo actual ProbogotaRegion (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
no es el logo actual ProbogotaRegion (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Es un logo que no es el actual de nuestra organización ProbogotaRegion (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no source (No source since). However, "You must provide a link (URL) to the original file and the authorship information if available". This file appears no longer to be available on the Agencia Brasil website, so a link to the source is not "available". A link to the agency should suffice. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- It seems a little strange to nominate a derived image for deletion when there appears to be no problem with its source, File:EsquadrilhaFumaca123145.jpeg. It would have been to easy to fix that, then put {{Derived from}} on the retouched. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment The original file is also no source. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Would you like me to drop all my other work to fix it? Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, go ahead. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, no can do, I'm way too busy as I have a backlog of 236 photos to process and another trip out today. You could do it. Rodhullandemu (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, go ahead. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- It seems a little strange to nominate a derived image for deletion when there appears to be no problem with its source, File:EsquadrilhaFumaca123145.jpeg. It would have been to easy to fix that, then put {{Derived from}} on the retouched. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep - The original image was uploaded in 2007 and there's nothing on webarchive so good luck finding a source for it!. Obviously since 2007 times have changed and things here have become a lot more stricter so this file shouldn't be deleted because of the lack of care in 2007. The file includes metadata etc so I see no reason to think this wouldn't be the uploaders work or work that was originally on the Brasil website. –Davey2010Talk 13:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no ource. --JuTa 20:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Copied from https://lsa.umich.edu/slavic/people/faculty/bogdana.html unlikely to be own work Matlin (talk) 09:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from https://lsa.umich.edu/content/michigan-lsa/slavic/en/people/faculty/bogdana/jcr:content/profileImage.transform/profile_portrait/image.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Uploader is not an author and has no permission. Matlin (talk) 09:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from https://phd.uniroma1.it/dottorati/cartellaProfili/cfaf22b2-7b2c-40f8-ab97-23e24b70bb38.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://twitter.com/stanleysbill Matlin (talk) 09:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://lostaszic.pl/prof-dr-hab-waclaw-osadnik/ . Please notice uploader about these multiple copyvios. Matlin (talk) 09:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from https://lostaszic.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/prof.Wac%C5%82aw-Osadnik.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
The very same image was detected by TinEye under the link https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8106/8451883477_18a84c35bd_b.jpg, with higher resolution and watermark bongbajo@yahoo.com. Bong Bajo Flickrstream still exists at Flickr (but with 3 separate accounts [1] / [2] and [3]) A few glance of his images on Flickr show his uploads as "All Rights Reserved" and bearing the same watermark email info. The image itself is absent from Flickr, perhaps he took this image down from his Flickr stream/s, but as TinEye detected it still exists at "farm9.static.flickr.com". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
A seemingly uncropped version (1200 x 800px), with the "uncropped top portion" is at http://www.investphilippinestaiwan.com/uploads/5/9/9/7/59974935/background-images/2133338222.jpg, used at http://www.investphilippinestaiwan.com/. Using regular deletion request as the webpage where this is purported to be used is undated. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The same image is found at https://m.facebook.com/Sta.LuciaSupermarket/photos/a.669273436561399/669273413228068/?type=3&source=44 (dated August 16, 2016: barely a month and a half from the claimed date of October 4, 2016 as claimed on the description page). As there is no FBMD transmission code, a deletion request is made instead of speedy deletion request instead. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Also, when downloaded (the FB image), the resolution is 1521x854px which is larger than this nominated image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Not own work: user has a history of questionable uploads at User talk:Mjdiamzon JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, the logo is too simple for copyright protection. I'll delete it as out of project scope. Per en:Draft:TRG International the organization was considered non-notable. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.38 20:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.38 20:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.38 20:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.38 20:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.38 20:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Pedro Bobadilla Vicepresidente.jpg and all files uploaded by PeterParaguay
[edit]For all the files: not own work. Images from Google Images. 190.231.219.38 20:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
and also
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. COM:SS Indeedous (talk) 07:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment please decide together with Commons:Deletion_requests/File:MSC_2021_SE_10_Macron_Merkel.jpg
- Keep no screenshot but publication of a photograph by the host of the event. They could also have published the original image of Michel, as they own the rights of their own recording. --Indeedous (talk) 07:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: agree with User:Indeedous. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused flowchart of unclear significance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
no source given: "on live" means "a book" witch one? 92.146.72.38 10:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
we have no OTRS authorization from Christian Lemeur (the author) send by mail does not mean CC-BY-SA 86.199.179.203 10:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
we have no OTRS authorization from Christian Lemeur (the author) send by mail does not mean CC-BY-SA 86.199.179.203 10:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
the background is under coryright see here 86.199.179.203 10:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
we have no OTRS authorization from Joël Thiry (book author) or Maggy Destrée (illustrator) 86.199.179.203 10:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
all these books cover are under copyright and the wooden bookcase is not the subject 86.199.179.203 10:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Lucyin is not the author, probably comes from one of these books, under copyright 86.199.179.203 10:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
we have no OTRS authorization from Jules Boulard (the author), scan from a book under copyright. Same request for File:Flayea Boulard.png, File:Colé=gorea Boulard34.jpg, File:Seye Boulard18.jpg, File:Rusteas Boulard22.jpg and File:Îpe_di_bwès_Boulard10b.jpg 86.199.179.203 10:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eraire Tchonveye 1960.jpg 86.199.179.203 11:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eraire Tchonveye 1960.jpg 86.199.179.203 11:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eraire Tchonveye 1960.jpg 86.199.179.203 11:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eraire Tchonveye 1960.jpg 86.199.179.203 11:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eraire Tchonveye 1960.jpg 86.199.179.203 11:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
we have no OTRS authorization from Calixte Culot, the author of the book 86.199.179.203 11:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- The photo is from 1912 and Calixte Culot was born in 1926 so I think we can safely assume that he is not the photographer. The real question is who the original photographer is and when he or she died. --MGA73 (talk)
- Indeed: Calixte Culot has just died (2020). We can ask permission to the editor, Musée de la Parole en Ardenne (contact@museedelaparole.be) whose secretary, Joël Thiry accepted some years ago, that the front covers of all books in Walloon published by their N.G.O. would be uploaded in Commons (we made a user name, but neither he or I ever used it).
- If the question is about the postcard, these where mostly taken in the 1920's or 1930's, sometimes earlier (later on, in the 1950's 1960's, they would be in colour). Can't we use an old files status ?
- --Lucyin (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Lucyin: We have {{PD-anon-70-EU}} if the photographer is not known. If you have the book perhaps the photographer is mentioned somewhere? --MGA73 (talk) 12:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- On the left bottom you can read "Edit. Lallemand, Marbehan", unknown photographer "H. Lallemand" according to this page. Not Louis Lallemand (1891-1959) the painter. We have other files for this photographer : 1, 2, 3. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 14:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 08:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
the same book as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Culot Calixte Raglenaedjes.jpg 86.199.179.203 11:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 09:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
the same book as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Culot Calixte Raglenaedjes.jpg 86.199.179.203 11:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Same as in the other DR: The photo is from 1912 and Calixte Culot was born in 1926 so I think we can safely assume that he is not the photographer. The real question is who the original photographer is and when he or she died. --MGA73 (talk) 12:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- On the right bottom you can read "Lenzen Phot. Bertrix". The photographer is Louis LENZEN born in 1869 in Bertrix. We don't know when he died but after 1920 according to this book or this page. Maybe @NearEMPTiness: has other informations as this user placed these photos: 1, 2, 3, 4 taken by the same photographer in the public domain. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- You know more than me, but I noted that four of Louis Lenzen's photos are available on Alamy without a disclaimer. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 08:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
This file has been superseded by File:Locator-map-Puerto-Rico-Canóvanas.svg. Reason to use the other file and delete this file: The other SVG is a better version because it is (.svg) valid and displays correctly. This SVG file, aside from being invalid with 49 errors, does not display correctly. This file only displays a red mark (on Google Chrome browser) and does not display map nor municipality borders. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
This file has been superseded by File:Locator-map-Puerto-Rico-Adjuntas.svg. Reason to use the other file and delete this file: The other SVG is a better version because it is (.svg) valid and displays correctly. This SVG file, aside from being invalid with 49 errors, does not display correctly. This file only displays a red mark (on Google Chrome browser) and does not display map nor municipality borders. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Is it free to upload from that site? E4024 (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm applying for a job, and I'm looking to scrub myself from most search results if possible, so I'd like to take down my photos from Wikimedia so I can clean my footprint. In addition, I'd like to remove the two I've posted as I don't feel they are necessary to keep up, nobody Is looking to use them. D.lopuck (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, numerous alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm applying for a job, and I'm looking to scrub myself from most search results if possible, so I'd like to take down my photos from Wikimedia so I can clean my footprint. In addition, I'd like to remove the two I've posted as I don't feel they are necessary to keep up, nobody Is looking to use them. Same reason as my other photo. D.lopuck (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, numerous alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://khouribga-2.skyrock.com/photo.html?id_article=3080238311&id_article_media=30688547
- Comment What is the precise reason for deletion? The link above says nothing. Ras67 (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep At the given source, a lower resolution version is only downloadable and its also the sole findable source (alleged "found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work"). For me, Energievision is the actual creator with the high resolution source file. --Ras67 (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Ras67. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 03:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Brynegenny as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 03:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: OBVIOUSLY not own work - image is very low res and distorted, person said the photo to be of in the description died in 1986, yet creation date indicates 2019. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Carl Ha (talk) 03:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Sana Sneha (talk) 11:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted (https://www.chec.bj.cn/pub/chec_pc/en/Projects/Projects_1/201903/t20190306_6512.html) Carl Ha (talk) 04:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: likely copyvio the other way around: the Commons image is older and higher resolution. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
maybe copyrighted, as the user uploaded a lot of surely copyrighted pictures Carl Ha (talk) 04:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and low-res, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
maybe copyrighted, as the user uploaded a lot of surely copyrighted pictures Carl Ha (talk) 04:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and low-res, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
maybe copyrighted, as the user uploaded a lot of surely copyrighted pictures Carl Ha (talk) 04:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and low-res, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
maybe copyrighted, as the user uploaded a lot of surely copyrighted pictures Carl Ha (talk) 04:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and low-res, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be an original derivative work form http://www.allanwexlerstudio.com/projects/chair-day without evidence of any permission. Possibly (talk) 04:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have a written permission to use this photo from the owner. How can I submit it to Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delightful void (talk • contribs) 21:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- see this. You are not the copyright holder, so it is likely that Wexler has to do the release.Possibly (talk) 05:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 01:25, 7 April 2021, by Fitindia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 05:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Potential copyvio. Low image resolution and missing exifdata. SCP-2000 06:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 06:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: A User page image that no longer in use. ชาวไทย (talk) 07:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Logo stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused, low quality image with poor description, does not respond to research. No edu value. Richard Avery (talk) 10:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This is not a seal. This is drawing of seal. OTRS-permission from artist is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Poor description, no context, no location, poor descriptive image. Little exemplar or educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Google arabic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: self promotional / not educationally useful.
Henxter (talk) 12:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Logo stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Something doesn't work. Wereszczyński (talk) 12:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, failed upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Discostu (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The user clearly did not make this map, as it is a very accurate road map and contains text in Portuguese. It was probably stolen from ICM Bio do Brasil, which has maps similar to this one, as in this publication here: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/plano-de-manejo/plano_de_manejo_vol_1_diagnostico_flona_de_humaita.pdf Uiaka (talk) 13:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is assuming bad faith, but I suppose I should take this nomination as compliment: "delete because no user would have done that good a map". I did in fact make this map, painstakingly, using Inkscape. At the time I was starting or expanding a series of Wikipedia articles on the protected areas in Brazil such as Lago do Cuniã Extractive Reserve, and also on the BR-319 highway that ran through the interfluvial, and wanted to illustrate the region. The map is based on other, more detailed maps. I have never mastered curves in Inkscape, so if you zoom in you will see that all the outlines take the form of linked straight line sections which are all my own, as is the choice of colors and font, placement of labels etc. Some of the text is in Portuguese because the names of the protected areas are Portuguese. There is no copyright violation. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: own work asserted by uploader, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused game team logo. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 14:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:DW and COM:FLICKRWASH, the Flickr user does not have the rights to republish/relicense a film still. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ffrancois87 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IglesiadelReinodeLosCielos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Documento para Toda la Iglesia Celestial a Nivel Mundial doc optimizado.pdf
- File:Convocatoria Mundial de Intercesión - Versión Final doc optimizado.pdf
- File:Somos Verdaderos Discípulos de Cristo (Yahshúa).pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Ensayo sobre atencion equitativa y social hacia las personas situacion consumo sustancias psicotropicas -convertido.pdf
[edit]and File:Estrategia final sobre personas privadas de libertad con accion afirmativa-1-convertido-2.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work showing underlying images of Blessed Carlo Acustis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The author no longer wants to have this on Wikimedia Commons Coljo17 (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 18:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Previously speedy deleted, unlikely to be own work — Racconish 💬 18:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by रोहित साव27 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. E4024 (talk) 19:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Which source? --E4024 (talk) 19:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader is seen in the photo, how can it be their own work?---रोहित(💌) 20:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
very small file without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical photo without essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope fetish content depicting a self-declared minor, which is of precisely zero encyclopedic use. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 21:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this is a rare video demonstrating crush fetish. --Hannolans (talk) 09:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 15:19, 3 April 2021, by Pi.1415926535. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Unfree DW: sculpture is a work of F. Hernandez per [4]. Undelete when freedom of panorama is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 17:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and not in use. --Ezarateesteban 17:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Unfree DW: sculptor Peter de Guzman appears to be alive (at least during ca. 2019[5][6]). Undelete when freedom of panorama is officially and formally introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 17:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashish Anchinhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 17:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of India.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Saint Patrick's Saltire.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Not own works, but COM:DW - no source/date/author. BTW, it would be much better if the original historical images were used at the articles instead of these personal artworks (see also COM:WEBHOST). P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
These images are artistic "conceptualizion" - no known images are presently available in public or historical records- original work information and rational behind their use are updated in each file descriptions and summary--Audioboss (talk) 01:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
I found historic images from my files- I will re-upload when images are verified These images are based on actual historical images- I will update tags and information before I re-upload images- --Audioboss (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:General Gregorio Tapalla.tif - tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
- File:General Emilip Verdeflor.tif - tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
- File:General Ariston Villanueva.tif - tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
- File:General Marcela Marcelo.tif - tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
- File:General Luis Malinis.tif- tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
- File:General Agueda Kahabagan.tif- tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
- File:General Ambrosio Mojica.tif - tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
- File:General Vicente Leyva.tif - tagged for deletion- will update wrong information tagged with this image- Will re-upload by author when source material verified
derived work information and rational updated in each file descriptions and summary--Audioboss (talk) 01:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:General Nicolas Gonzales.tif
- File:General Manuel Tinio.tif
- File:General Gregorio Del Pilar.tif
- File:General Pantaleon Villegas.tif
- File:General Mariano Llanera.tif
- File:General Vicente Lukban.tif
- File:General Teodoro Sandiko (Sandico) (1860-1939).tif
- File:General Mariano Noriel.tif
- File:General Troadio Galicano.tif
- File:General Juan Saraza Castañeda.tif
- File:General Cipriano Pacheco.tif
- File:General Alejo Nazareno Miñosa.tif
- File:General Eusebio Roque.tif
*I can confirm that ticket:2020033010007214 seems to be valid as well as the licenses granted on Flickr.
- While I share the doubts about using these images in Wikipedia, the artist seems to be notable. See:
- So Keep Ankry (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nevertheless out of scope. See my point below regarding making up likenesses. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- My argument about using "idealized" or "conceptual" images are as follows"--Audioboss (talk) 00:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
"Many scholars believe that Cesare Borgia was the basis for some depictions of Jesus that eventually became the standard look that is used until today."
"Pope Alexander lV then ordered the destruction of all art depicting a Semitic Jesus and commissioned a number of paintings depicting a Caucasian Jesus. His son, Cardinal Cesare Borgia, was the model for these paintings. Thus, the nastiest of all the Borgias, became the iconic Caucasian Jesus so loved by Christians today."
** Should we remove all Jesus Christ's related images in wikipedia because surely no one really knows what he looks like?
Moreover, most depiction of dinosaurs and extinct fauna are mostly "conceptualized" and "ideal" based on limited fossil specimen.
Should we remove all dinosaurs photos in wikipedia because most of them are "artist" conceptualization?
There is no "hoax" or "malicious" misleading that you implied in your presentation. Hoax means "to trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hoax). I have put all full disclosure in the description that images are either "based on historical images" or artistic "conceptualization" or "rendering".
Surely, we are all entitled to our own opinions and perspectives. I am the source of all the "derived" and "conceptualized" images of historical people.The images which I draw digitally from scratch from my sketchpad to the computer. Respectfully, the idea is not to mislead or hoax people. The depiction of the images does not claim that those are the exact likeness of the people rather "idealized" or "conceptual" only. --Audioboss (talk) 21:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC) If my research integrity is in question, I am a professional artist who has done artwork for international exhibitions and also a scientist who works for a Medical hospital and has done academic discourses in history and microbiology. --Audioboss (talk) 00:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
https://www.behance.net/michelangelomayo
--Audioboss (talk) 00:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
--Audioboss (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree with making up a likeness for a historical person if none exist! That is no different than making up details about a person just because it is not known. Misleading or wrong info is worse than no info. And this has nothing to do with culture. Your personal artwork is not important and significant in preserving Filipino cultural history. In fact, I do consider as misleading, a hoax.
- Furthermore, OTRS doesn't apply to historical images. You must provide proof of date/source/author for those. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
--Audioboss (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
I do appreciate this discourse and I am respectful of your point of view
Most of the source materials for the research are from a long set of report from 1898-1906 Report of the Lieutenant-General Commanding the Army - United States. War Department- extensively referenced in the page List of Filipino Revolutionary Generals.
--Audioboss (talk) 20:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
--Audioboss (talk) 20:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Delete The first batch, the conceptualizations, have no place on Commons. There is no educational purpose to be served by keeping imaginary images of famous people.
The second batch, which are all based on existing images have the same problem -- why would we want these in place of actual images? Further, none of them give the source -- in each case it must be proven that the source image is freely licensed or PD.
Also note that TIF is deprecated for image use on Commons, so in order to keep them, someone will have to convert them to JPG. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
I can convert all to jpeg---Audioboss (talk) 21:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: One image (File:General Gregorio Tapalla.tif) has a freely licensed source in the artist's Flickr page. I would suggest @Audioboss: to do the same for other images. However, if the arts are COM:DW of some photos, then the status of original photos also needs to be resolved. Ankry (talk) 07:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's actually better to convert them to PNG first, because it's more efficient in compression while being lossless like TIF. It's always important to have a "master" version to edit on in order to prevent quality loss, and PNG can do that. That's if these images will be kept though. pandakekok9 09:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
General Agueda Kahabagan.tif -
Own derivative and transformative visual artwork or illustration with portions taken from public domain material.
Composition also contains sufficient new, creative content to entitle it to its own copyright.
Source: scanned photographs and illustrations (unknown author) from archived photo titled "Heroines of the Revolution" with tagged remark- Agueda Kahabagan that was compiled in "History of Philippines (dated between 1800-1920)" folder from Lipa City Public Library and Museum (Philippines).
The source material for the derivative and transformative artwork is in the public domain for the following reasons:
|
This work was first published in the Philippines and is now in the public domain because its copyright protection has expired by virtue of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines. The work meets one of the following criteria:
 You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.
|
 |
|
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it meets three requirements:
 For background information, see the explanations on Non-U.S. copyrights.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings. |
--Audioboss (talk) 19:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete two first files as uploader's request on uploading week. The other files are deleted by other admins due to other reasons. Taivo (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
per COM:PCP and COM:LL. Many of the files uploaded by Audioboss are derivatives of works of unclear or doubtful sources, or of non-free content. Possible licence laundering. Furthermore, many of the derivative works are out of scope. While the original photos of the subjects may be in scope, the derivative work appears to be self promotion of their art -- Wikimedia Commons is not one's personal free web host.
- File:Thorleif Torstensson.jpg
- File:Zouheïra Salem.jpg
- File:Pelle Alsing.jpg
- File:Paolo Sassone-Corsi at UCI.jpg
- File:Senator Alfredo S. Lim- as a senator.jpg
- File:Maria Angela Salazar.jpg
- File:Mark Rocco.jpg
- File:Leslie Randall.jpg
- File:Masakazu Konishi.jpg
- File:Engel Reinhoudt.jpg
- File:Medicine band.jpg
- File:Dominic Sonic.jpg
- File:Seyfi Dursunoğlu.jpg
- File:Elize Cawood.jpg
- File:Janne Bondi Johannessen.jpg
- File:Maura Murphy.jpg
- File:Ludwig Finscher.jpg
- File:Đàm Liên.jpg
- File:Santiago Manuin Valera.jpg
- File:Antonio Cuenco.jpg
- File:Luciano Rondinella.jpg
- File:Ramon Revilla Sr.jpg
- File:Anita Linda younger.jpg
- File:Roberto Peccei.jpg
- File:Zoe Dell Nutter.jpg
- File:Otto De La Rocha.jpg
- File:Angelo Lo Forese.jpg
- File:Michelle Rossignol.jpg
- File:Susana Ortiz.jpg
- File:General Candido Tirona.jpg
- File:General Crispulo Aguinaldo.jpg
- File:General Daniel Tirona.jpg
- File:General Jose Alejandrino.jpg
- File:General Emiliano Riego de Dios.jpg
- File:General Licerio Geronimo.jpg
- File:General Mariano Trias.jpg
- File:General Alejo Nazareno Miñosa.jpg
- File:General Vicente Lukban.jpg
- File:General Nicolas Gonzales.jpg
- File:General Pantaleon Villegas.jpg
- File:General Leandro Fullon.jpg
- File:General Claro Guevarra.jpg
- File:Zarina Hashmi.jpg
- File:General Cipriano Pacheco.jpg
- File:General Ludovico Arejola.jpg
- File:General Ananias Diokno.jpg
- File:General Ciriaco Bonifacio.jpg
- File:General Francisco Carreon.jpg
- File:General Valentin Diaz.jpg
- File:General Troadio Galicano.jpg
- File:General Isidoro Torres.tif
- File:General Teodoro Sandiko.jpg
- File:General Berixio Consola.jpg
- File:General Mariano Noriel.jpg
- File:General Eusebio Roque.jpg
- File:General Cornelio Felizardo.jpg
- File:Akira Kume.jpg
- File:Nick Marsh and Gigantic.jpg
- File:Knud Sønderby.jpg
- File:General Flaviano Yengko.jpg
- File:Genral Venancio Concepcion.jpg
- File:General Wenceslao Viniegra.jpg
- File:General Martin Delgado.jpg
- File:General Anastacio Francisco.jpg
- File:General Simeon Ola.jpg
- File:General Servillano Aquino.jpg
- File:General Mateo Luga.jpg
- File:Cecil Bødker.jpg
- File:Senator Heherson Alvarez.jpg
- File:Amparo Dávila.jpg
- File:General Marcela Marcelo.jpg
- File:General Gregorio Tapalla.jpg
- File:General Vicente Leyva.jpg
- File:General Juan Saraza Castañeda.jpg
- File:General Ambrosio Mojica.jpg
- File:General Agueda Kahabagan.jpg
- File:Patricia Bosworth.jpg
- File:Dora Werzberg Amelan.jpg
- File:General Ariston Villanueva.jpg
- File:General Luciano San Miguel.jpg
- File:General Juan Cailles.jpg
- File:General Baldomero Aguinaldo.jpg
- File:General Francisco Makabulos.jpg
- File:General Eleuterio Marasigan.jpg
- File:Freddy Wittop.jpg
- File:Mark Hollis.jpg
- File:General Luis Malinis.jpg
- File:General Emilio Verdeflor.jpg
- File:General Nicolas Capistrano.jpg
- File:General Mariano Riego De Dios.jpg
- File:General Licerio Topacio.jpg
- File:General Edilberto Evangelista.jpg
- File:General Guillermo Masangkay.jpg
- File:General Bonifacio Aranas.jpg
- File:Iva Davies.jpg
- File:General Primitivo Artacho.jpg
- File:General Aniceto Oruga.jpg
- File:John Frederick Nims.jpg
- File:Eleo Pomare.jpg
- File:General Emilio Jacinto.jpg
- File:General Benito Natividad.jpg
- File:General Apolonio Samson.jpg
- File:General Gregoria Montoya.png
- File:General Paciano Rizal.png
- File:General Simeon Latorre.png
- File:General Pio Del Pilar.png
- File:General Artemio Ricarte.tif
- File:General Mamerto Natividad.tif
- File:General Antonio Montenegro.tif
- File:General Vito Belarmino.tif
- File:General Elias Angeles.tif
- File:General Jose Ignacio Paua.tif
- File:Gérard Calvi.jpg
- File:Milt Gross.jpg
- File:Pacifichelys urbinai.jpg
- File:Irina Korschunow.jpg
Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Greetings- for the most part of my involvement with Wikicommons, I have always complied with the administrators. The body of my work that you have marked for deletion are all derivative works that I have done. All of the ones in these list, I have noted their sources as either from historical documents and photos in public domain especially the derived works of the Generals from documents and image files (1890-1910). On my derived works, I have images of photos and sketches that I took while I was either a student or while I was attending the conferences with these people depicted. Almost all of of them published with my name in local papers, circular, and dailies. So, I thought that derivative works from own personal photos, drawings, and images are okay to use as long as description of ownership are disclosed. I do admit that there were few of my project was deleted because I thought that my rational for using other materials will be fine because of disclosures of copyright rational. I speedy deleted them myself. Derivative works are not acceptable with Wikicommons? I even ask OTRS and was granted in several of them so that I can clarify its usage. Many have them have been in Wikicommons for years with several revisions and copyright info updated by admins and other users.
- I do feel that a certain user was hounding and harassing me personally for several reasons:
- Instead of communicating with me directly about my contributions, the user nominated me for blocking or blacklisting me right away.
- Even after I send the user a scanned copy of one of my sources from Spartan Daily with my name as contributor for one of my derived work. He accused me of fakery without forensic study of my work. He probably used tineye or google image web app that does not really detect subtleties in photos. I provided a scanned copy of my newspaper clipping with my name as contributor and it was deemed a fake. this is just total conjecture.
- Because the majority of my contributions were derived, they were all evaluated as fake without carefully evaluating the summary and info that is provided in the files.
- Even my own photographs from my Iphone for the Philippine dances were conjured as fake, noting that I faked the EXIF files.
- I even explained to the user who questioned my metadata that since the work is derived, I have those as composite scanned images for better resolution and workflow.
- If derivative works and illustrations (e.g. File:Pacifichelys urbinai.jpg which I drew from my Paleontology class) can be branded as fake because a user does not like my contributions. What about my rights as a user and contributor?
- I have been a financial contributor and a long time user with many editing contributions to Wiki. I do not have conflicts of interest or financial gains as my contributions are my academic interests. Please be aware the randomness of my works- I usually try to contribute to pages with less information about the people being depicted. I try to provide images for people to see, if I have the person available in my collection of my own photographs. Notice that several of my contributions were people in the science, politics, or entertainers because I am a microbiologist and sociologist and I have seen these people from symposiums and I love going to concerts and interviews. This personal attack , hounding, and bullying is quite disturbing. You may want to check the language and the tone that the user used to communicate with me during the discussion. The communication was not cordial rather accusatory with flimsy evidence and no further inquiries or technical analysis at all. --Audioboss (talk) 04:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- The source for File:Irina Korschunow.jpg, which you uploaded in 2014 as your own work, is here. Are we done now? Mo Billings (talk) 06:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please be aware that Philippine Generals were from sources over 100 years old and were taken from microfiche and really in poor quality. Moreover, some of them were taken from sources available throughout the internet and are in public domain in US and Philippines since they are over 100 years old. Philippine Revolution was from 1896-1910 any original photos and documents from this era is already public domain.
- All these info are noted in each files info and source info:
- File:General Vicente Leyva.jpg
- File:General Juan Saraza Castañeda.jpg
- File:General Ambrosio Mojica.jpg
- File:General Agueda Kahabagan.jpg
- File:General Ariston Villanueva.jpg
- File:General Luciano San Miguel.jpg
- File:General Juan Cailles.jpg
- File:General Baldomero Aguinaldo.jpg
- File:General Francisco Makabulos.jpg
- File:General Eleuterio Marasigan.jpg
- File:General Luis Malinis.jpg
- File:General Emilio Verdeflor.jpg
- File:General Nicolas Capistrano.jpg
- File:General Mariano Riego De Dios.jpg
- File:General Licerio Topacio.jpg
- File:General Edilberto Evangelista.jpg
- File:General Guillermo Masangkay.jpg
- File:General Bonifacio Aranas.jpg
- File:General Primitivo Artacho.jpg
- File:General Aniceto Oruga.jpg
- File:General Emilio Jacinto.jpg
- File:General Benito Natividad.jpg
- File:General Apolonio Samson.jpg
- File:General Gregoria Montoya.png
- File:General Paciano Rizal.png
- File:General Simeon Latorre.png
- File:General Pio Del Pilar.png
- File:General Artemio Ricarte.tif
- File:General Mamerto Natividad.tif
- File:General Antonio Montenegro.tif
- File:General Vito Belarmino.tif
- File:General Elias Angeles.tif
- File:General Jose Ignacio Paua.tif
- --Audioboss (talk) 05:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:Pacifichelys urbinai.jpg is my own drawing from my Paleontology class. I own copyright for that.
- File:Senator Alfredo S. Lim- as a senator.jpg
- File:Senator Heherson Alvarez.jpg
- File:Ramon Revilla Sr.jpg
- Images used were from Government official site considered public domain and fair use in the Philippines therefore acceptable here in US too.
- Most of information are noted in permission and summary info. These are almost all my contribution. Can you be patient with me. I have to pull every file I have to search for the info that you need.
- With all respect, if I have to defend my contributions, can I also file grievance against harassment from the user that initiated this? I do not mind the bother but if I feel that I am doing all this trouble for something frivolous and chronic then there is no point for me to continue contributing to this voluntary endeavor. --Audioboss (talk) 06:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:Leslie Randall.jpg for this work I used a sketch that I made in late 1980s or mid 1980s when I attended a writer's symposium in LA. Most of the works that you flagged are done with composite and rendering software to appear photo like. The raw file is here https://www.flickr.com/photos/44518673@N00/51074298482/in/dateposted-public/
- Now, for the David Roback file - I used my photo that was used in my school paper Spartan Daily. I was one of the photo contributor. The file of the clipping is here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/44518673@N00/51068958211/in/dateposted-public/ . You can see my name under the photo for credit.
- It appears that even if I validate all the works , It is going to be deleted anyway because it may not be in The Scope of contribution needed. It seems that the only media that Wikicommons wanted are real photographs. I thought that derivative works are accepted; but it appears that derivative works are very hard to contribute because some users do not want them for personal reason or bias. I do not use this contribution to "advertise" my art. The commercial aspect of my art does not include portraits of famous people. My art is not commercialize anyway because I am a mail artist , I just exchange art with other artist primarily. If I have few art in the gallery- The style is abstract and surreal. I do not even advertise my contributions in Wikicommons. I do not mention my projects for Wikicommons in my CV or website. To me, this is just pure academic. Any admin can request to see my personal webpages for inspection via personal email only for my privacy protection. --Audioboss (talk) 19:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- The source for the face in File:Leslie Randall.jpg can be seen here. As per usual, it is a digital collage with filters applied. It should be obvious to anyone familiar with image editing that the "sketch" on Flickr is could not be the source for the image uploaded here and has been freshly created to disguise yet another instance of copyright violation by Audioboss. Are we done here yet? This is getting tiresome and could have been dealt with at ANU where I started the discussion. Mo Billings (talk) 21:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- The discussion should really be per file basis- each file has different source information and should be validated individually. --Audioboss (talk) 02:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Photo and info of General Luciano San Miguel is derived Philippine National Library. A similar photo is from this source- Note that the picture is from 1903. General San Miguel died in 1903.
- Photo is in public domain in Philippines as well as US
- https://collectanea2017.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/the-unsung-heroes-of-the-philippine-revolution/
- General Luciano San Miguel
- January 7, 1875 – March 28, 1903
- Photo and info of General Nicolas Gonzales is derived Philippine National Library. A similar photo is from this source- Note that the picture is from 1900 when he was in the Revolution. General Nicolas Gonzales died in 1925.
- Photo is in public domain in Philippines as well as US
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:General_Nicolas_Gonzales.jpg
- General and Governor NICOLAS GONZALEZ of Tanauan ,Batangas 1858-1925
- https://www.facebook.com/ust.valiantlegions/photos/thomasiangeneral-and-governor-nicolas-gonzalez-of-tanauan-batangas-1858-1925he-w/1008598842620418/
- all of this info can be inquired by contacting the Philippine National Library on there website:
- http://web.nlp.gov.ph/nlp/?q=node/684 --Audioboss (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anita_Linda_younger.jpg
- Composite derivative images are acceptable because:
- Source material: Photographs of Anita Linda by anonymous photographer circa 1940s
- According to the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition),
- Photographic works are protected for 50 years from the publication of the work and, if unpublished, for 50 years from the making.
- The composite images represent a portrait of the actress and a background of her still in performance which represents her as an actress.
- This does not advertise self-promotion because I did not put any signature that denotes self publishing. Furthermore, I use my generic username for credit. --Audioboss (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete as per nom and previous DR. Moreover, it would be much better if the original historical images were used at the articles instead of these personal artworks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. For the so-called historical photos, Audioboss continues to prevail a claim that every old photo of the Philippines found on web may be freely used. That is wrong: publication date may be later than public domain. Even if these are {{PD-Philippines}} here, these may have had their U.S. copyrights restored (COM:URAA). Commons requires images and its underlying artworks to be free both in the source country (for this case the Philippines) and the United States. Images, paintings, drawings, and other artistic works that are free here but not in the U.S. are actually unacceptable here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. While photos may be in the public domain, the previously untouched images would be much better to use. Seconding COM:ADVERT. Poppytarts (talk) 14:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
not own work: see metadata Bradipo Lento (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Add File:Graziana Grassini.jpg by the same user for the same reason, thanks Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to File:02986jfPaltao Pulilan Welcome Cutcot Bulacanfvf 13.JPG, which is better since it's not obviously tilted (unlike this possibly-crooked image). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:33, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Please forgive me for resorting to a deletion request, but could it be that this picture is a copyright violation? It depicts a work of art by a living artist. Did the Children's Museum of Indianapolis have the artist's permission to upload a picture of her artwork under a free license? Thanks, Gnom (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- I came here through the notice at the meta:Wikimedians in Residence Exchange Network. Although this media came from a Wikimedian in Residence project, we have consensus that staff Wikimedians at organizations want exactly the same treatment as anyone else, so please treat this accordingly.
- Optional but nice practice includes pinging the uploader and the host institution of the situation.
- Regardless of whether the host institution has permission, this file on Commons does not indicate permission, and consequently the file should be deleted unless we confirm copyright license. We have permission from the museum for the photograph; we require additionally permission for the work depicted in the photograph. Requiring this permission demonstrates respect for the artist.
- I looked for the artist's contact but could not find a direct one. I only found galleries selling this person's work, and I doubt based on experience that they would quickly understand a copyright release as well as the legal team from the museum donating the photo. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have informed the uploader on-wiki at User talk:LoriLee and at en:Wikipedia talk:GLAM/The Children's Museum of Indianapolis. --Gnom (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 06:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 06:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Various stained glass artworks of this church were added during the renovation of 2019 (the windows were plain before that). Fail {{PD-Philippines-artistic work}}. If COM:OTRS permission from the craftsmen is impossible, restore these only if Freedom of Panorama is introduced here officially and formally.
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 18.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 19.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 20.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 21.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 23.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 24.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 25.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 26.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 27.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 28.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 29.jpg
- File:0466Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador 30.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 02.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 03.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 06.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 07.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 08.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 09.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 11.jpg
- File:0499Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador Pulilan 12.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
"John (Johnny) Alexander McGhee (October 3, 1905, Philadelphia – July 3, 1978, Huntington New York) was an American Trumpeter and Big Band Leader." so says the Draft article on en WP. The extended details show this picture to have been taken on an iPhone 8. Obviously this is a photo of a photo. The files discussion page contains a comment fr the uploader asserting that there are no copyright issues. This all needs a copyright expert to check, please Timtrent (talk) 20:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: private album means not previously published and probably not anonymous. Thus life+70 applies and its probably too recent for that. --Geni (talk) 06:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Erreur téléchargement StanyH (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The files in question have apparently been deleted by now. --Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
speedy|motif de la suppression. StanyH (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Pas sûr que l'utilisateur veuille vraiment faire supprimer sa page de discussion. Ça ressemble à une erreur. Ça semble plutôt se rapporter à des demandes de suppression de fichiers. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
--StanyH (talk) 21:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC) Oui Asclepias, je demande la suppression de l'ensemble des fichiers téléchargés par erreur. Je suis nouvelle contributrice... Les photos mises par erreur sur Commons ne sont pas valables.
Est-ce plutôt ceci ?
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Erreur téléchargement StanyH (talk) 21:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
--StanyH (talk) 21:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC) Asclepias
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by OsamaK as no source (No source since). Can't type it here on the phone on the file page so will write it below. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, the file description currently reads "Bill Gates. Cropped and enhanced from this picture. - Photo: Ricardo Stuckert/ABr - Description of the original: Bill Gates and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in Davos. Photo:ABr. Date:Jan/26/2003. - Davos (Suíça), 26/01/2003 (Agência Brasil - ABr) - O presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva encontra-se com Bill Gates, presidente da empresa Microsoft, durante o Fórum Econômico Mundial, em Davos, Suíça. (Foto/Ricardo Stuckert/Palácio do Planalto/Divulgação ABr- hor-26)" and the license States "This license is not valid for content that was produced (i.e. date taken) by Agência Brasil after 23 February 2017. (see Village Pump discussion)" but the original file was uploaded in 2005, last time I checked 2005 occurred before 23 February 2017. Or am I missing something here? Likely several files will have to be undeleted. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, i'm not quite sure why the original file was deleted in 2008, but i'm pretty sure this was from that Brazilian agency indeed.
Husky (talk to me) 10:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC) - Delete per COM:PCP. The original file was deleted, unable to verify the copyright status. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
ポスター.jpg){kind=link}
![42 File:Shooting Set on the "Hunting the Phantom" film.JPG](#File:Shooting_Set_on_the_"Hunting_the_Phantom"_film.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![151 File:""NeVeR LosEs Tier1 Sub Texture , Texture from , NeVeR LosEs Twitch Oct 2016.jpg".jpg](#File:""NeVeR_LosEs_Tier1_Sub_Texture_,_Texture_from_,_NeVeR_LosEs_Twitch_Oct_2016.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
%E3%83%9D%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E3%83%9D%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ポスター.jpg){kind=link}
ポスター.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![22:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/26#c-P199-2021-03-26T22:18:00.000Z-File:Shooting_Set_on_the_"Hunting_the_Phantom"_film.JPG){kind=link}
![18:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/26#c-Jcornelius-2021-04-02T18:12:00.000Z-File:Shooting_Set_on_the_"Hunting_the_Phantom"_film.JPG){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_2021.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Battre_un_mine_deblayer_a_l%27aide_d%27une_grue_a_vapeur_et_d%27un_decauville_(Photo_Louis_Lenzen,_barbier_puis_photographe_a_Betrix,_collection_Tjenke_Dagnelle)_01.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Battre_un_mine_deblayer_a_l%27aide_d%27une_grue_a_vapeur_et_d%27un_decauville_(Photo_Louis_Lenzen,_barbier_puis_photographe_a_Betrix,_collection_Tjenke_Dagnelle)_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Le_travail_est_dur,_harassant_et_la_main_d%27oeuvre_abodante_(Photo_Louis_Lenzen,_barbier_puis_photographe_a_Betrix,_collection_Tjenke_Dagnelle).jpg){kind=link}
_-_La_tranchee_d%27Herbeumont_se_dessine_peu_a_peu_(Photo_Louis_Lenzen,_barbier_puis_photographe_a_Betrix,_collection_Tjenke_Dagnelle).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: The original file was deleted because there was no direct source given. I've found one from Agencia Brasil and restored that file. Which means this file now has a proper source too. --Rosenzweig τ 16:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. No indication this is a work of a United States Department of Homeland Security employee. 188.123.231.41 11:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Wrong, dead wrong. Is an ICE photograph. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's an ICE photo. Why hasn't this deletion request been closed? MrAureliusR (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, [7]. --Rosenzweig τ 17:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyvio, given the uploader's history. Taken from Google. Small. No camera metadata. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Google Exif and uploader's history suggest that this probably isn't the uploader's own work. -M.nelson (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 21:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
No exif, unlikely to be own work, PCP Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Versions of this image were published prior to upload date ([8] and [9]) with copyright notices and no indication of a free license. Unlikely to be own work and likely a copyright violation. mattbr 07:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Beschaffungsamt des Bundesministeriums des Innern Logo.svg. Leyo 10:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Beschaffungsamt des BMI Logo 2017.png and File:BeschA 2017 WebSVG de.svg. Leyo 10:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Федір Омельченко підпис Труди фізично-математичного відділу. Том II. Вип. 2-5. 1926 (page 340 crop).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
dublicate of File:Підпис Федора Омельченка - Труди фізично-математичного відділу. Том II. Вип. 2-5. 1926 (page 340 crop).jpg Brunei (talk) 15:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 17:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Illustrative, smoking, topless men, men with beards and it's useful quality. --Fæ (talk) 20:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Fæ. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM: TOO UK. Certainly free in the US, but likely not the UK. Pbrks (talk) 22:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: found here. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Bild wurde überarbeitet GTS Giess- Technische- Sonderkeramik (talk) 10:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- @GTS Giess- Technische- Sonderkeramik: And what should be a valid reason for deletion? Creating a new image or derived version is not a reason to delete the original image. --ŠJů (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Use {{Split}} instead and please withdraw the DR. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have moved the overwritten file to File:GTS Keramiktiegel - Made in Germany (2).jpg --Sreejith K (talk) 20:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by OsamaK as no source (No source since), please see: "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bill gates portrait.jpg", but this file lacks a URL for reference. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: on the referenced website, https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/fotos, it is stated "all rights reserved", so no trace of a free licence. --Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
No CC license indicates on https://www.cultura.gob.ar/ A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
No CC license indicates on https://www.cultura.gob.ar/ A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 00:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:FOP China currently only applies for outdoor works only and this is in a underground metro station which is indoor. Eti15TrSf (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:FOP China. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: law is public place no outdoor. --Geni (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Century Park Station
[edit]COM:FOP China currently only applies for outdoor works only and this is in an underground metro station which is indoor.
- File:201908 Decoration on the Platform Sidewall of Century Park Station.jpg
- File:Century Park Station Fresco.JPG
Eti15TrSf (talk) 16:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: COM:FOP China states that "Indoor works: Not OK, but this could change from June 2021 with the 2020 amendment of the copyright law."? --Tomchen1989 (talk) 11:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed, this rationale will be invalid after 4 days. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:FOP China accepts indoor works since June 2021. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: the law changed and the standard is now public place. --Geni (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Looks like it was previously published at https://www.deviantart.com/sakyeucliffe-oc/art/Saky-focus-my-histori-398372712, which does not appear to have a CC license. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination DA came first. --Geni (talk) 00:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Me gustaria borrar la imagen Javip fotografias (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE. Creative Commons licenses are non-revokable. -M.nelson (talk) 20:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Me gustaria borrar la imagen Javip fotografias (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE. Creative Commons licenses are non-revokable. -M.nelson (talk) 20:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Possibly copyrighted: artist Patrick Mathews commissioned by GD rock band 151.82.32.230 10:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence that artist Patrick Mathews or the Get Dead band released the logo under a CC license -M.nelson (talk) 20:50, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Photograph of an unidentified person, relevance doubtful, connection with claimed categories doubtful or tenuous Schlosser67 (talk) 10:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Poorly described, Does not respond to research.No intuitive educational or exemplar value. Richard Avery (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Potential copyvio. Low image resolution and missing exifdata. COM:OTRS permission is needed. SCP-2000 18:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Dick pick, though labelled with components, so not evident that this is non-educative, though also not evident that it is needed — billinghurst sDrewth 03:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- "though also not evident that it is needed" means one of too many (COM:DICK) and "joven" means young, could be underage and no need to take a risk at a place where dicks abound. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Brynegenny as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: нигде не используется — billinghurst sDrewth 03:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:COURTESY - unused, uploader requested deletion same day as uploading. -M.nelson (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark of M.nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Opéra Bastille
[edit]The blanket statement "because the architect had wished it to be copyleft" is not enough and doesn't comply with COM:L which requires an explicit commercial license from the architect and that such license is specific and irrevocable. If the architect doesn't allow its inclusion in commercial postcards and advertising materials, then this building is still unfree for Commons. There is no acceptable FOP in France, its architect is still living. See an admin's opposing input to my undeletion attempt at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-03#File:Opera bastille.JPG. See also [10], which includes Opéra Bastille as one of the copyright-protected monumental buildings.
- File:4030ParigiOperaBastille.JPG
- File:Bastille Opera Building.jpg
- File:Bastille Opera House - Paris 2013.jpg
- File:Bastille, Mai 2013.jpg
- File:Collage Garnier Bastille.jpg
- File:Colonne de Juillet.jpg
- File:Décoration murale dans une salle de l'Opéra Bastille.jpg
- File:France, Paris, place de la Bastille, la base de la Colonne de Juillet et l'Opéra Bastille.jpg
- File:Le désir en gris (16950507603).jpg
- File:Opera Bastille, Paris, 26 Sept. 2009.jpg
- File:Opèra Bastille, Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France - panoramio.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille - panoramio.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille 1.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille 2.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille 2011.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille 3, Paris June 2010.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille 3.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille 4.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille 6.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille 7.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille 8.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (24682419144).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (25219902131).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (25219914801).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (27156088054).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (27734009856).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (28647179993).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (29160005942).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (29189572081).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Paris (29233860666).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille @ Place de la Bastille @ Paris (25299465249).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille bis.JPG
- File:Opéra Bastille in Paris.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille, Paris 2012.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille.JPG
- File:Opéra de Paris Bastille, Paris June 2002.jpg
- File:Opéra National de Paris Bastille Paris France.JPG
- File:P1090068 France, Paris, place de la Bastille, l'opéra Bastille conçue par Carlos Ott et inaugurée en 1989 (5629199523).jpg
- File:Paris (7514412542).jpg
- File:Paris (7514413410).jpg
- File:Paris (7514423502).jpg
- File:Paris Gay Pride 2009 (3671522048).jpg
- File:Paris Opera House, Opéra Bastille.jpg
- File:Paris Opéra Bastille 20120630 crowd.jpg
- File:Paris Opéra Bastille 20120630 entrances.jpg
- File:Paris Opéra Bastille 20120630.jpg
- File:Pourquoi choisir ? (22824476617).jpg
- File:Streets (32770552085).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If the architect have made a valid statement, that this is copyleft then I think we can keep it. If someone write to us directly via OTRS we should of course try to make them select a specific license etc. But is the statement is not send directly to us I think we should not reject it just because it does not meet our current practice. I bet many old OTRS permissions would not be accepted today for example.
- If the architect is alive then pehaps someone that speak French could send a nice mail asking for clarification if needed. --MGA73 (talk) 06:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- MGA73 I'm not sure if this will work. Per elcobbola at my failed undeletion attempt, "COM:L requires an explicit license and that such license is specific and irrevocable. Statement that 'the architect had wished it to be copyleft' does not meet these criteria and is entirely inadequate." I realize that it is indeed inadequate because we don't know what type of license does w:Carlos Ott authorize in his blanket statement. CC-BY/CC-BY-SA/PD, or the Commons-unacceptable CC licenses with "NC" (no-commercial) or "ND" (no-derivatives) conditions? A French-speaking (since the architectural artwork is in France) or Spanish-speaking (since the architect hails from a Spanish-speaking country) is encouraged to conduct correspondence to the architect. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- JWilz12345 I have not seen the wording of the statement so I can't decide if it is good enough. I just wanted to point out that I do not think we should not be super strict regarding permissions that is not send to us directly. When someone send a permission to OTRS we can be strict because we can easily ask them to clarify and they can easily reply. We can't do that if the statement is not send to us directly. If it is unclear what is meant then I think we should use the least free license instead of just assuming he meant PD. But regarding copyleft then if you read en:Copyleft#Copyleft_principles then it says that it allows derivative works and it is even more clear in the table at en:Copyleft#Types_and_relation_to_other_licenses that "copyleft" does not include NC or ND.
- MGA73 I'm not sure if this will work. Per elcobbola at my failed undeletion attempt, "COM:L requires an explicit license and that such license is specific and irrevocable. Statement that 'the architect had wished it to be copyleft' does not meet these criteria and is entirely inadequate." I realize that it is indeed inadequate because we don't know what type of license does w:Carlos Ott authorize in his blanket statement. CC-BY/CC-BY-SA/PD, or the Commons-unacceptable CC licenses with "NC" (no-commercial) or "ND" (no-derivatives) conditions? A French-speaking (since the architectural artwork is in France) or Spanish-speaking (since the architect hails from a Spanish-speaking country) is encouraged to conduct correspondence to the architect. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- According to Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle we should delete if there is "significant doubt about the freedom". It does not mean we should delete all files where ther is the slightest risk.
- So in my opinion we can Keep if we can prove that he did make a statemt and if he did use the word copyleft. However if it is just the uploader that say "I once met him on the street and he told me that he would like his work to be free" then I would Delete. --MGA73 (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- @MGA73: the statement is at the category page itself, using an archived source as citation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! The links are broken but on the archieved version on web.archive.org we can see the text. I do not speak French but if the English translation is correct then I think that it is very likely that the architect did in fact whish the opera to be copy left - if SNAPIG (Syndicat national des agences photographiques d'illustration générale) is an organization that can be trusted. --MGA73 (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- @MGA73: that's one thing I can't answer sadly. I cannot understand French too. Hopefully French Wikipedians will help here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! The links are broken but on the archieved version on web.archive.org we can see the text. I do not speak French but if the English translation is correct then I think that it is very likely that the architect did in fact whish the opera to be copy left - if SNAPIG (Syndicat national des agences photographiques d'illustration générale) is an organization that can be trusted. --MGA73 (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- @MGA73: the statement is at the category page itself, using an archived source as citation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with MGA73. 73.158.114.70 14:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC).
If it helps any, here is the English translation (from this updated link):
- “We can understand the photographer's anger when we know that among recent monuments only the Bastille Opera House can be freely photographed. The architect (an original?) wanted it to be free of rights. Normally, the copyright of architects is required until seventy years after their death. But when a new 'artist' adds his or her contribution to an old building, it's back to the drawing board... This is typically the case with the Eiffel Tower. To reproduce a photo of this national icon at night, you must first pay a fee to the lighting company, the Société nouvelle d'exploitation de la tour Eiffel. The reason? The lighting, let it be said, is a "work of the soul". At least since a ruling by the Créteil High Court in March 1998. In the same way, fireworks and other sounds and lights are also protected... A bit of an exaggeration?”
Furthermore, from the 'What Can you Photograph in Paris?' official Paris City Hall webpage:
- "The panorama exception allows copyright to be neutralised for photographs of architectural works and sculptures permanently placed on public thoroughfares (thus ephemeral works are not included) provided that the photograph is not used for commercial purposes."
As for what really is (or isn't) 'copyleft' or not (for any country), 'istockphoto' (getty images) is (also) a good reference: in the link, notice that none of their Eiffel tower images include its lighting, because the SNTE (Société Nouvelle de la Tour Eiffel) does demand authors' rights for images taken of its lighting additions to the tower. And since Getty straight-out sells images, you can be sure that they know that they would be at the top of the target list for any architect seeking royalties/authors' rights. Cheers. THEPROMENADER 08:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- @ThePromenader: I don't think it is sufficient. To quote the opposing input of Elcobbola (one of Commons' veteran admins) over a deleted image of this same building I was trying to restore then: "COM:L requires an explicit license and that such license is specific and irrevocable. Statement that "the architect had wished (or wanted) it to be copyleft" does not meet these criteria and is entirely inadequate." I think the only question us what degree of freeness does the architect wished? Free photography is out of question. Perhaps free, unrestricted commercial exploitations of images of his work is the thing here. Perhaps the true question is: is architect w:Carlos Ott willing to release his architectural work under free license or public domain in the way that everyone can take photos and exploit the resulting images freely even for commercial purposes? And is his desire to release his work under copyleft perpetual/for eternity? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- As for the Eiffel Tower at night, all of the deleted images of it here were recently restored, on the grounds that the current lighting is too ordinary to pass COM:TOO France, and that the court ruling actually refers to a specific lighting during the 90s (if I can recall correctly). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Question Does anyone have the actual quote/statement from the architect that they have waived their (copy)rights? -M.nelson (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. There is no Freedom of Panorama in France, per COM:FOP France. We would need a clear statement from the architect. This would be good for the free content lobby. But "copyleft"is too vague to rely on. --Ellywa (talk) 21:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Opéra Bastille
[edit]No FoP in France, and the building was designed by Carlos Ott who is still alive. France knows a standard of life + 70 years.
- File:Foyer Bastille.jpg
- File:La salle de l'opéra Bastille vue depuis la scène.jpg
- File:Opera de Paris Bastille (27654531774).jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille 1, Paris June 2010.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille 2, Paris June 2010.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille in Paris, France.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille, Paris 6 August 2015.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille, Paris, upper foyer.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille, Paris.jpg
- File:Opéra Bastille.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep Are you serious ?
"The images of the Opera Bastille are free of rights, despite no COM:FOP France. The architect authorized free use of pictures of the Opera. See http://www.snapig.com/fr/Y-a-pas-photo.pdf (archieved version on web.archive.org). Page 23 of this PDF document we can read (in French) : "parmi les monuments récents seul l’Opéra de la Bastille peut être librement photographié. L’architecte [...] l’ayant souhaité libre de droits. (translation : "among recent monuments only the Opéra Bastille can be freely photographed because the architect had wished it to be copyleft"). This document is edited by the SNAPIG (Syndicat national des agences photographiques d'illustration générale), which is quite serious and, according to their website, has been created with the strong wish to respect authors rights.
See also http://www.sne.fr/img/pdf/SNE/Illustration/y-a-pas-photo2.pdf (archieved version on web.archive.org), page 23, or http://www.sne.fr/img/file/pdf/SNE/Commissions/Illustration/espacePublic.pdf (link no longer online), page 10 (document edited by the Syndicat national de l'édition)." --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, very interesting. But see above, same argument was made before. If the ones above get undeleted, I withdraw my DR as well. If not, sorry. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs the architect should send an email to the Wikimedia Foundation (see COM:VRTS) if he really desires to allow everyone to exploit his building for commercial purposes. But there is a likelihood that anti-FoP and anti-Wikipedia group ADAGP will restrain him from doing so. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The photo was previously deleted for not having a license (tagged by me), but I restored it to allow discussion. Per Special:PermaLink/546479250#Re_deletion_of_Ray_Martin_Orchestra_Leader_photo, it might be in the public domain. According to w:en:Ray Martin (orchestra leader), the subject, Ray Martin, "became an arranger and composer for the Royal Air Force Band" and he was active from 1940s to 1980s, so the photo might be in the PD (see COM:CROWN). That may be the case, but I still think we need stronger evidence to prove it really is free. Ahmadtalk 00:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I've found this photo online which was taken in the 1950s: shorturl.at/uHOPV As you can see, Ray is noticeably older in that photo, meaning that the one I provided must therefore be in the public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theenglishway88 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The current template on the file page is Template:PD-UKGov/Crown copyright. This is highly unlikely, because the UK government will not publish such a photo. If it is a private and promo photo, as is suggested in this discussion]. The copyright will thus expire after 70 years. The date of the photo is not known, somewhere in the 1940/1950’s. For reasons of COM:PRP I will assume 1955 at the latest. In that case the photo must be deleted for now but may be undeleted in 2026. .. --Ellywa (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a conference. The screen is not own by Moscow Kremlin A1Cafel (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of a conference. The screen is not own by Moscow Kremlin A1Cafel (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Also File:Sadyr Japarov 10.11.2020.jpg should be nominated. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab meets India's Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Subrahmanyam Jaishankar (50722523161).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright holder said Mushtak Photography, not works from FCDO. The nominator didn't give any proof of this thing that Mushtak don't work for FCDO. Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 06:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The exif data show copyright of mushtak.photography. Perhaps the foreign office flickr account made a mistake, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 19:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by OsamaK as no source (No source since). "This license is not valid for content that was produced (i.e. date taken) by Agência Brasil after 23 February 2017. (see Village Pump discussion)", but this file was uploaded in 2005. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: perhaps taken from a flickr account but I could not find the source. --Ellywa (talk) 19:52, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Fake own work tag, the image can be found: https://www.fotografet.lv/photos/4/76306 DJ EV (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, although the source links does not work, per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 19:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
No meaningful description, no intuitive educational or exemplar value. Richard Avery (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- The submitter should indeed add a meaningful description, in particular the place should be mentioned. Otherwise, the photo is useable as an illustration, hence we may keep it. --Schlosser67 (talk) 10:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Based on the user's other uploads, this image depicts a building at Indiana University South Bend. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, can have educational value. --Ellywa (talk) 19:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work as claimed: see also another questionable file from the uploader (File:StaLuciaLogo NoBackground1.png) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely not the uploader's own work. Is it PD per
COM:TOO Saint Lucia/COM:Saint LuciaCOM:TOO Philippines/COM:Philippines? -M.nelson (talk) 20:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)- @M.nelson it is a corporate logo from here (the Philippines). "St. Lucia" is the name of a real estate/housing company here, not the Caribbean country. We do not have clear TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks JWilz12345. Is there a trend to Philippines TOO DRs? -M.nelson (talk) 00:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @M.nelson: not much. Our main focus here is the proposed FOP provision now pending in the w:House of Representatives of the Philippines as part of several revisions/amendments to our copyright law (the wording is similar to Australian FOP). To date no significant opposition to FOP in HOR, and we are waiting for the Senate to draft their own version, we are a bicameral country. Regarding TOO, no concept of "TOO for corporate or institutional logos/insignia" here, as we don't have legal cases to support. Saw one DR with mention of TOO before: at COM:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 5. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:29, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks JWilz12345. Is there a trend to Philippines TOO DRs? -M.nelson (talk) 00:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @M.nelson it is a corporate logo from here (the Philippines). "St. Lucia" is the name of a real estate/housing company here, not the Caribbean country. We do not have clear TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work: user has a history of questionable uploads at User talk:Mjdiamzon JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and in addition no word about TOO on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vietnam. --Ellywa (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Me gustaria borrar la imagen Javip fotografias (talk) 11:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - not in use; uploader COM:COURTESY. -M.nelson (talk) 20:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Porque sí Sinsentido Enrique.garzo.cano (talk) 13:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no educational value and without of COM:SCOPE. Uploader did not explain function or purpose of this equipment. --Ellywa (talk) 19:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Porque sí Sinsentido Enrique.garzo.cano (talk) 14:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no educational value and without of COM:SCOPE. Uploader did not explain. --Ellywa (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
There is an image on Wikipedia with the same image as this, and saying it's non-free. Take a look here >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Plants_vs._Zombies_Heroes.png <<<. 2601:40:C003:9550:6CAD:57D4:5FEF:BB19 17:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, non free according en:WP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by زیارات مقدسہ (talk · contribs)
[edit]derivative works of unclear copyright status
_1992.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1992_-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)