Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 5th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author wants to delete. Detective Akai (talk) 05:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non free file on Flickr. --rubin16 (talk) 09:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image is clearly not own work but ripped off from Pinterest. Here is reverse images search. Pinterest policy isn't license under CC 4.0 nor any CC either. Paper9oll (talk) 08:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of naked children. Out of Commons:Project scope. Request from national library of Israel.

-- Geagea (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 08:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake upload Asm Dip (talk) 09:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request, dupe of File:Mushroom grow on a dead tree..jpg. --Achim (talk) 13:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploded by error HOD-ACHARYA (talk) 09:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was merely a test to learn how to upload images. I apologize for any inconvenience caused Alriga (talk) 11:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 13:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G3: Vandalism. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 85.249.193.229 21:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My request Pastelli (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. As per source though reverse image search stated that 'Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited" Paper9oll (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image not should be uploaded to commons. My mistake. Mario Busch (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:07, 6 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Album cover --Krdbot 21:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters en:Domo (NHK) [1]. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ymblanter at 23:00, 6 März 2021 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Ivanlebebev clear copyright violations --Krdbot 03:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Housekeeping/author request. Redirect left behind from a rename that needs to be deleted in order to make way for a different file to occupy this name Nick Boppel (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sorry, but this isn't really the place for uploading random photos of yourself. --Molandfreak (talk) 06:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per CSD F10. Out of project scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Trade (talk) 08:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy: copyvio. --Lymantria (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WiZDumB87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent copvyios - low res, no EXIF, visual characteristics suggest screenshots, uploader significant copyvio history etc. Duck/PRP issue

Эlcobbola talk 16:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barefoot Boy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Foot selfies are out of COM:SCOPE as personal, non-educational images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barefoot Boy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Girl's Bare Feet at a Park.png: low quality, out of scope

Who raised you anyway.png: Woo-ooh

Girl's Bare Feet.png: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/2635015

Kiely Williams barefoot - Shake Your Tailfeather.png: screenshot

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barefoot Boy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

different cameras in EXIFs, history of copyvios, some files state other authors without permission

rubin16 (talk) 11:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guimas4PT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various files uploaded by Guimas4PT, in which all of them are of low resolution and have no EXIF documentation. Given by the fact that the user already has 13 files nominated for deletion (including 5 from Facebook), the files' source and permission are suspicious, and are most likely to be copyrighted by others.

廣九直通車 (talk) 13:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ausbasketvic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

same as my other nom, these all appear to be flickrwashed and don't appear to be taken by the uploader on flickr and lack any exif data anywhere.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunitha Sunil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • [IT] Io penso che per il contenuto specifico di questi files, Commons sia l'unico posto adatto ad ospitarli. Se cosi' non fosse, vorrei che EugeneZelenko ne esplicitasse il motivo.
  • [ES] Creo que Commons es el único lugar adecuado para alojar estos ficheros y son contenido específico. Si non es asi, por favor EugeneZelenko expliqueme por qué no estás de acuerdo
  • [EN] I think that Commons is the only suitable place to house this files because their specificity. Please EugeneZelenko explain me why you do not agree

Joram (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, keeping this (in dubio pro reo...) Steinsplitter (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 21:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hasanmasod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from video. Should blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arahman1997 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Respectyourselfhere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ratna Kumar Mishra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blovua (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quent18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works: small low-res images, 2 of which are taken from FB as per EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   18:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kreuzkimcamille (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miguelba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Perhaps these are all screenshots from Google Street View.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Storryer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glawbr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Perhaps these are screenshots of something. The original source must be correctly presented.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Հոմոսափիենս (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a another copy of this file ryanzyofficial (talk) 06:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 08:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 08:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 09:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BobMattLover (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 09:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk 09:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 09:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. Not in use. --Ahmadtalk 21:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website itself lists its contents as being copyrighted. Nick Moreau (talk) 00:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Regasterios at 18:25, 12 März 2021 UTC: No permission since 4 March 2021 --Krdbot 03:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly copyrighted, by Disney. Nick Moreau (talk) 00:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Regasterios at 18:26, 12 März 2021 UTC: No permission since 4 March 2021 --Krdbot 03:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image of unknown person. E4024 (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of an unidentified person; not an "own work" as declared, either. E4024 (talk) 01:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:NOTUSED. Random corner of a room. Out of scope. BriefEdits (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Romanian law (section 33 (1)(h) of the law of Copyright of 1996) requires us to have the permission of the person who created the monument as well as that of the photographer (see COM:FOP). 79.112.18.133 06:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep What monument? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, no FOP in Romania. Kameraad Pjotr 19:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was completed in 1971 and designed by Dinu Hariton, Gheorghe Nădrag, Ion Moscu and Romeo Belea per enwiki article. Romania has no commercial freedom of panorama, and COM:OTRS permission from them (or their heirs) for this freely-licensed image is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was completed in 1971 and designed by architects Dinu Hariton, Gheorghe Nădrag, Ion Moscu and Romeo Belea per enwiki article. Romania has no commercial freedom of panorama, and COM:OTRS permission from them (or their heirs) for these freely-licensed images is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept 2 per Razvan Socol. --Minoraxtalk 11:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Romania.

A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Kept 1. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image previously published at https://atthesauce.com/2019/12/22/what-does-a-peach-sound-like-with-bee-wilson/ - no indication this is free licence Dl2000 (talk) 14:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One year ago I published that but I didn’t want more to have that on the web Roberto Gomes Vidal (talk) 23:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, identifiable minor. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Copyvio) Logo de l'université d'Évry-Val d'Essonne (les logos ne sont pas acceptés dans Commons) Poudou99 (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 10:41, 17 März 2021 UTC: No permission since 9 March 2021 --Krdbot 15:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 3D artistic work was incepted in 1998, and designed by Walt Disney Imagineering. There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, and a request for a free license from Walt Disney Imagineering for these images under free/commercial licensing is required. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Tree of Life (Disney) (which dates back to October 2009).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not good J. Y. Baker (talk) 14:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: author request. ƏXPLICIT 12:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as a joke Kotofey2016 (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --ƏXPLICIT 13:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a copyrighted logo It's trademarked not copyrighted as the tags have been filled in. Nomination withdrawn.  Speedy keepWx7758521 (talk) 07:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Clearly not simple shape and thus a TOO problem. OTRS required. --Achim (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: complex logo. ƏXPLICIT 00:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per source, a Getty Images photo Ytoyoda (talk) 14:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by حمدي قنديل (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No License, Uploaded from Google

إسلام (talk) 22:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain the reason for the deletion

حمدي(ناقشني) — Preceding unsigned comment added by حمدي قنديل (talk • contribs) 06:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for non-architectural works. Subject is a 2003 work by Clinton Snider per the Detroit Institute of Arts. Publication needs his permission via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent sculpture in USA, there is no FOP, therefore the image is a derivative work and a copyright violation.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. US sculpture from 2003. Trycatch (talk) 04:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is the same subject as that of the deleted file: this is a 2002 sculpture created by w:Niki de Saint Phalle, one of her last works. There is no freedom of panorama in the U.S., and permission and free license from her heirs is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

when recorded thought to be plural of Kanzlerbonus, but 'Kanzlerbonus' is a singulariatantum Jeuwre (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 19:33, 28 März 2021 UTC: Uploader wish --Krdbot 20:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

when recorded thought to be plural of Kanzlerbonus, but 'Kanzlerbonus' is a singulariatantum Jeuwre (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 19:33, 28 März 2021 UTC: Uploader wish --Krdbot 20:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

when recorded thought to be plural of Kanzlerbonus, but 'Kanzlerbonus' is a singulariatantum Jeuwre (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 19:33, 28 März 2021 UTC: Uploader wish --Krdbot 20:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

when recorded thought to be plural of Kanzlerbonus, but 'Kanzlerbonus' is a singulariatantum Jeuwre (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 19:35, 28 März 2021 UTC: Uploader wish --Krdbot 20:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled, pronunciation means knitternd, pronunciation file already exists, no need for renaming Jeuwre (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 19:37, 28 März 2021 UTC: Uploader wish --Krdbot 20:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nintendo Game ACNH stuffs

[edit]

COM:CV These files contains the stuffs of Nintendo game en:Animal Crossing: New Horizons(ACNH), which are non-free. --Netora (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 13:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as a joke / personal attack; the person depicted is definitely not a dwarf (карлик) as the description suggests Le Loy (talk) 00:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled, the mountains in south east Europe are spelled Karpaten, pronunciation example with correct spelling already exists, see Jeuwre (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled, see kiffen, all its inflections are spelled with double-'f', already exists, no need for renaming Jeuwre (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled, see kiffen, all its inflections are spelled with double-'f', already exists, no need for renaming Jeuwre (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled, correct spelling is sechzehn (without 's'), pronunciation file with correct spelling already exists, see and Jeuwre (talk) 09:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo d'un plan d'Evry sans autorisation des auteurs Poudou99 (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Nous, Université d'Évry sommes les auteurs des plans et photos que nous essayons de mettre sur la page de l'Université afin que cette page wikipédia au sujet de notre établissement soit enfin à jour. Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Université d'Évry (talk • contribs) 08:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Université d'Évry: réponse dans votre page de discussion pour voir les explications afin de vous permettre de justifier que vous êtes bien l'auteur de ce plan.--Poudou99 (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan eines urheberrechtlich geschützten Werks Alpöhi (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Die Datei ist m. E. urheberrechtlich unproblematisch. Sie wird vom Verlag (Orell Füssli) auf der Website https://www.ofv.ch/kinderbuch/detail/elisabeth-wird-gesund/100399/ den Medien zur Verfügung gestellt.Mfbruellmann


Deleted: per nomination. Für Wikimedia Commons reicht es nicht aus, wenn eine Datei "den Medien zur Verfügung gestellt" wird, sie muss ausdrücklich unter einer freien Lizenz stehen oder gemeinfrei sein, beides ist hier nicht erkennbar. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan eines urheberrechtlich geschützten Werks Alpöhi (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich um ein Bildzitat aus einem Lehrbuch für die Primarschule, das nicht mehr verwendet wird. Nach schweizerischem und deutschem Urheberrecht scheint mir die Verwendung im Sinn eines Bildzitats unproblematisch. Siehe dazu auch https://steigerlegal.ch/2013/01/09/urheberrecht-irrtum-zitat-creative-commons/ Mfbruellmann


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons akzeptiert leider keine Werke, bei denen man sich auf das Recht zum Bildzitat beruft (ebensowenig wie "fair use" nach amerikanischem Recht), da alles, was hier hochgeladen wird, frei weiterverwendbar sein muss, auch ausserhalb des Rahmens von Bildzitaten. Denkbar wäre höchstens der lokale Upload z.B. in der deutschen Wikipedia, *wenn* dort Bildzitate akzeptiert wären, was die dortige Community allerdings bislang auch nicht wollte. In der englischen Wikipedia hingegen ist "fair use" akzeptiert, dort ist so etwas möglich. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan eines urheberrechtlich geschützten Werks Alpöhi (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich um ein Bildzitat aus einem Lehrbuch für die Primarschule, das nicht mehr verwendet wird. Nach schweizerischem und deutschem Urheberrecht scheint mir die Verwendung im Sinn eines Bildzitats unproblematisch. Siehe dazu auch https://steigerlegal.ch/2013/01/09/urheberrecht-irrtum-zitat-creative-commons/ Mfbruellmann


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons akzeptiert leider keine Werke, bei denen man sich auf das Recht zum Bildzitat beruft (ebensowenig wie "fair use" nach amerikanischem Recht), da alles, was hier hochgeladen wird, frei weiterverwendbar sein muss, auch ausserhalb des Rahmens von Bildzitaten. Denkbar wäre höchstens der lokale Upload z.B. in der deutschen Wikipedia, *wenn* dort Bildzitate akzeptiert wären, was die dortige Community allerdings bislang auch nicht wollte. In der englischen Wikipedia hingegen ist "fair use" akzeptiert, dort ist so etwas möglich. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken of image on the PC or TV screen. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most likely copyrighted film poster. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like per COM:TOYS OTRS-permission from toymaker is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per uploader's request QuintusHaterius (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested delete within 7 days of upload. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sorry, the vehicle registration no. is visible. I will upload a new file. JuTe CLZ (talk) 12:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested delete within 7 days of upload. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely professional portrait. Photographer should confirm license by contacting OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hej! I can confirm that I took the photograph myself at a Spotify offsite. Do you need more details? --Alexis macleod (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Alexis macleod: ... We'd love to keep this great photo! Please follow the instructions on →OTRS←... the photo's metadata suggests this is (probably a crop of) a photo from "S&D Wedding"... you should include in your email to OTRS details on whether you were the wedding photographer for Sofia and Daniel Ek... you may also need to confirm that if this is one of their wedding photos, whether you retained copyright, and whether complies with our policies on identifiable people. Storkk (talk) 13:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. This is the subject's Twitter profile pic, https://twitter.com/eldsjal --Rrburke (talk) 13:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like he's going to have to get his own Wikipedia account. Apologies. Will delete.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexis macleod (talk • contribs) 15:28, 22 November 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis macleod: please consider just clarifying the situation using the procedure outlined at OTRS. If Mr. Ek does upload the photograph, he will have to follow the same procedure to confirm that he owns the copyright. Storkk (talk) 14:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll tell him. Can't work out how to delete it. Hummmm... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexis macleod (talk • contribs)
Only administrators can delete files. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a valid license; clearly taken from subject's Twitter bio: https://twitter.com/eldsjal/photo Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 13:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Found eleswehre online - needs COM:OTRS permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't need a Wikimedia Commons page anymore as I will not edit the wiki in future. Sanket Panja (talk) 13:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect name tag. This is not the Pierre d'Etat in Montigny Pitzman (talk) 23:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. Could be renamed to File:Mégalithe de Roumare.jpg or the like. Pitzman, try Shift-Alt-m on your keyboard and enter a better name. --Achim (talk) 09:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. See Commons:File renaming. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low definition image. Unreadable. No exemplar or edu value. Richard Avery (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped copy of file unused — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmandaLeeRoberts (talk • contribs) 01:46, 2 March 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete File:The_Honourable_Dr._Nicholas_Blain.jpg AmandaLeeRoberts (talk) 01:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason presented.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not licensed; unused photo where deletion requested by author. howcheng {chat} 18:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: It's a descriptive sign, not any sort of literary work. Also according to this website, the sign existed in 1968 so without any sort of copyright notice on the sign that would make the text public domain by default. Kingofthedead (talk) 07:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 18:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is from https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/photos/picture/ships/4152611/9204063/shipid:208301 . There is no indication of a free license at the source. We would need the photographer to send permission to COM:OTRS. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicated file with lower resolution of another file JG03 (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 19:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 09:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Papper (talk · contribs) nominated the photo for speedy deletion, because (s)he does not believe own work. But the photo has been 12½ years in Commons and deserves a regular deletion request. Another problem is scope: maybe we have much better photos about the same model? Taivo (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I normally reflexively lean towards keeping images such as this one, but this isn't particularly useful (small, modified wheels, plenty of better photos). My hunch is that it is just grabbed from the net and later uploaded from the user's harddrive. On the other hand, it could absolutely be legit (there is no solid evidence that the user is misstating matters) and I do not want to promote needless purges. I suggest keeping it unless something comes up which proves it to be a copyvio. 12+ years and no issues until now allows me to sleep well at night. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 19:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Photo is included in a gallery page of photos the uploader claims to be own work, and there is no reason not to trust them,. howcheng {chat} 19:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Papper (talk · contribs) nominated the photo for speedy deletion, because (s)he does not believe own work. But the photo has been 13½ years in Commons and deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Photo is included in a gallery page of photos the uploader claims to be own work, and there is no reason not to trust them. howcheng {chat} 19:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising of a dubious hangover remedy. Unused, undescribed. No edu value Richard Avery (talk) 10:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM per the username of uploader. SCP-2000 11:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this website, the painting on the left is a work by Ivan Kulik (who was born in 1959 and was still active from 2010-2011). Thus publication needs permission from him via COM:OTRS. In terms of COM:Freedom of Panorama in Poland, it is limited only to exterior, permanent works. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hanooz as no permission (No permission since) but I can't find it published anywhere else or history of prior copyright violations rubin16 (talk) 12:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Assuming good faith the part of the uploader. Feel free to delete if we find later that this is a copyvio. howcheng {chat} 19:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Copyrighted photo, no proof that uploader is photographer. Photographers name in Exif-data. Htm (talk) 13:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is unsued, superseded by File:Product Sans typeface sample.svg, and is generally of lower quality than the former. Chlod (talk) 13:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hanooz as no permission (No permission since): I don't see this image published anywhere else, any signs in EXIF... no idea why it couldn't be considered as own work rubin16 (talk) 13:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Assuming good faith the part of the uploader. Feel free to delete if we find later that this is a copyvio. howcheng {chat} 19:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hanooz as no permission (No permission since): I don't see this image published anywhere else, any signs in EXIF... no idea why it couldn't be considered as own work rubin16 (talk) 13:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Assuming good faith the part of the uploader. Feel free to delete if we find later that this is a copyvio. howcheng {chat} 19:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen duplicate of File:Husinec (PV), hovnocuc.jpg. ŠJů (talk) 13:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen duplicate of File:Husinec (PV), hovnocuc.jpg. ŠJů (talk) 13:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the author,as seen in https://web.al.ce.gov.br/index.php/component/search/?searchword=jos%C3%A9%20sarto&ordering=newest&searchphrase=all&areas[0]=phocagallery&start=400 Paladinum2 (talk) 13:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find any evidence that this logo was ever used by Valve Software or for the GoldSrc engine. Their own site does not list it, showing a different watermark. If this IS an official logo, it's far too complex for public domain in my opinion with the shaping and gradients. But I don't think it's official, which means it's basically false. The file is being used on 10 projects which means those projects are making a false claim that this is a trademark/company logo when it isn't. Misrepresentation of a company/product's logo would seem to be out of project scope. -- ferret (talk) 14:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tineye yield result as early in 2009. Also there is no EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-res version of photo found at https://www.annalaporta.com/de/foto/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, poorly cropped, and redundant Iketsi (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image missing EXIF from relatively new uploader who has uploaded other copyvios. Would likely needed to have press credentials to get the angle of this shot from pro basketball player. —Bagumba (talk) 14:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:PayPal.svg and seems difficult to use because its background is not transparent. Larryasou (talk) 14:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A more specific source is needed A1Cafel (talk) 14:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The image is in the slideshow at the bottom of the article, but there is no indication that CC-BY-SA is applicable. howcheng {chat} 19:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Freely licensed per https://en.president.az/site_info/about. howcheng {chat} 19:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Challenged by uploader Pratyush.shrivastava. I don't see any justification for G10, either.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep While this user has certainly had some issues both here and at EN.WP, I don't see how this particular image qualifies for deletion. All rights have been released. It may have been used in an article that was deleted at WP, but that doesn't taint the image itself. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 19:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a video taken in 2016 (see https://enslavedexhibitions.com/thomson-reuters-trust-women-conference-london/); no evidence of permission. discospinster (talk) 14:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only the cover page under CC licenses is posted on the site http://jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/1451, not the entire book. Please delete this book. Gorana Gomirac (VMRS) (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source indicates the book is CC-BY-NC-ND. howcheng {chat} 19:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not educational Veverve (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. howcheng {chat} 19:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is not own work of BYLJEDNOUJEDENJEZ – copyvio, it also meet the threshold of originality (instead of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_M%C3%A1me_r%C3%A1di_%C4%8Cesko.png) Patrik L. (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is obvious. Delete it. --Packa (talk) 09:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope/no use? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree entirely with EugeneZelenko--Headlock0225 (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Probable copyright violation. This is an article published in "Current Science", a journal of the Indian Academy of Sciences. https://www.currentscience.ac.in/GeoWriter (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image may be in the public domain for age but certainly it is not an "own work". Please show source (where and when it was published if ever) and tell us who the author of it is (other than the uploader). E4024 (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User who created this image didn't bother to omit the watermark. I've cropped the image tighter at Rashami Desai in 2020 (cropped 2).jpg Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly a copyvio. The uploader states it's a fair use upload from Cricket Australia. Their terms (https://www.cricket.com.au/terms-conditions) state that "You may view the Website and its contents but you are prohibited from copying, reproducing, modifying, distributing, displaying, performing or transmitting any of the contents of the site for any purposes.". That would seem to me to be a clear copyvio Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Copyvio) Logo de l'université d'Évry-Val d'Essonne (les logos ne sont pas acceptés dans Commons) Poudou99 (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skyhigh2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per image description, these photos were taken from social media and are not original works.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is the social network (VK) at the driver's page. Probably Alena (the user who uploaded the image) is not the right holder. The-ultimate-square (talk) 18:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SosyalDemokrat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused alternate history / fictional election maps.

HyperGaruda (talk) 18:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SosyalDemokrat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictitious/alt-hist election results (why are most southeastern states missing?), some of which are even impossible give a purpose on a Wikimedia project due to random character strings for descriptions.

HyperGaruda (talk) 06:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ho sostituito questa immagine con un altra. A.Petrolo (talk) 18:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused photo, deletion requested by author. howcheng {chat} 19:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GiovanniYosh12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work but official logos, above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9   20:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The logos I uploaded are my own work, derivative of the official logos. The World Youth Day logo is an issue for me because this is an event happened 25 years ago, and a official high quality version isn't available online, only very low quality scans of the logo. I believe in my judgement that I should do an SVG recreation of the logo because of this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GiovanniYosh12 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't own the rights to the logo, then you cannot even make a derivative of it, see COM:DW. Logos are above COM:TOO and can't be on Commons at all. --P 1 9 9   15:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work but taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9   20:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Renardo la vulpo (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file was created (photographed) by me but I do not know who was the artist of the sculpture. Still that should not matter, as Germany has “Freedom of Panorama”. I did not contribute to the {{Artwork}}, so I cannot claim any copyright for myself; I would release the picture as cc-zero but that would look like I am pretending to be the artist.
Is there no license such as {{Photographed based on FoP}}? -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 23:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Since there are no arguments about this issue I am issuing a  Keep vote myself: I see no reason why my image should be deleted. –– Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Renardo la vulpo, by construction of the law (at least in Germany), and essentially also by construction of the CC licenses, the copyright in the sculpture is strictly separate from the copyright in the photograph. Therefore, you can -- and under Wikimedia Commons' licensing policy must -- license the photograph under a free license of your choice (such as CC0), however it must be made clear that the license refers only to the photograph (I wrote about this a few years ago in more detail here, in German). Right now, as you acknowledge, there is no such license in the file description, so something is indeed missing. — Pajz (talk) 22:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pajz, thank you for your explanation. I added a {{Cc-zero}} licence and unterstand that it only concerns my photograph. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Renardo la vulpo, looks good! — Pajz (talk) 18:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 19:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This file comes from the website of the President of Azerbaijan. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. --TarPas (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete F8: File:İlham Əliyev jurnalistlər üçün tikilmiş binada mənzillərin paylanması mərasimində (2017) 29.jpg --TarPas (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Billinghurst (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is credited to the subject's Flickr account. Unlikely that the basketball player took a photograph of himself playing basketball Ytoyoda (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytoyoda: That photo is improperly attributed. Revised Ausbasketvic (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 19:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence the uploader on flickr actually is the copyright holder - there's no exif data and this looks to be taken by a pro and then filtered on instagram or similar, while the uploader's flickr doesn't appear to be an actual photographer but a bunch of flickrwashing. Praxidicae (talk) 14:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Howcheng. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Selamat Datang Monument. The owner of this logo, Grand Indonesia, was sued 1 billion rupiahs by Henk Ngantung family due to its copyright status, see this news. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 02:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Base maps lacks a source. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, in use, no apparent CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this is a Derivative work. See COM:SEAL. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: It's apparently a derivative of File:Emblem of the Vatican City.png. Ahmadtalk 14:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is a photograph of an actual flag bearing the papal insignia. Rmhermen (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, that one is a derivative of this one. Do we know this insignia is free? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Kept; since other uses of the seal which this is derivative of date back to the 16th century, PD -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Substantial text 2003, copyright protected under US law. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Derivative of work by living artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Not sure that it is not self-made, I have checked other photos of the uploader: not googled anywhere, too, but are of the same topic/time/place rubin16 (talk) 09:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Derivative works from music. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted video of various images and music without source info. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced as from the website aarhus.dk and with an author, yet no indication it's free. TherasTaneel (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The link is from the website, where the picture right now is sourced from. I have asked the author and the person on the photo for permission to add the picture to Wikimedia Commons. The picture is uploaded at the request of both in order to add it to the wikipedia-page of the person on the photo. If there is anything I need to add or change in order to comply with Wikimedia Commons then please let me know. Sincerely BJE_111

Goodie, please make a OTRS permission to confirm it, see how here. TherasTaneel (talk) 12:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted More than half a year later, no evidence of progress in getting permission. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A more specific source is needed A1Cafel (talk) 14:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, license claim unsupported by source site. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures of this user are obvious copyright violations. The organisation in question is a small right wing youth group Uudenmaan akseli and the user, who claims these are his own work, uses in some files that same name but here the name Varisverkosto, that is a antifascist movement whose policy is to publish the same pictures and reveal identitities of members of right wing extremist groups on their own page and now here also. The pictures are obviously originally taken from this groups social media accounts and logos from their page. Matthäus Gehägeberg (talk) 15:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll need to find the original source of this photo to prove this is a copyright violation. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 19:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Multiple similar photos by uploader since deleted as copyright violations/false claims, establishing pattern. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely to be eligible for copyright in China. See DR.

Larryasou (talk) 16:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Beyond COM:TOO China. SCP-2000 17:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 85.249.193.229 21:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW, work of artist who died in 1979, still copyright by heirs. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial. E4024 (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this nice work of art is obviously recent and still in copyright. Regrettably, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception for works in the public. So, either a permission from the original painter is obtained or the image needs to be deleted, as it violates his/her copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

hello, I'm the author. I'm Alessio Sarra, the person the articles talk about — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibralex (talk • contribs) 10:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC) sono miei disegni — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibralex (talk • contribs) 10:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A video of music performances from 1950s. The songs that were performed may be copyrighted. George Ho (talk) 11:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Films from the Prelinger archive have explicitely been released in the public domain. I have added a warning in the permission section that some of the performed works may still be under copyright. — Racconish💬 12:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either  Delete or remove sound-track. My understanding is that both the audio and visuals must be PD for a sound video to be PD. Music has two (relevant here) copyrights: composition copyright, and performance copyright. Presuming the performance copyright has expired, that leaves the composition copyrights. Some of the individual tunes are well in the public domain (eg Swannee River) but at least Strayhorn's "Take the A Train" is still under copyright with BMI (some others may be under composition copyrights as well; research for individual compositions would be needed). Alas, no "fair use" on Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain. Contains a performance of the national anthem of South Vietnam, written by Lưu_Hữu_Phước, who died in 1989. DHN (talk) 21:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahidulislamratulx (talk • contribs) 16:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moves qualit qualité d'image Sigmundg (talk) 19:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as a joke 85.249.193.229 21:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 85.249.193.229 21:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, artist died in 1957. --P 1 9 9   20:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ملف بلا هدف واضح، لا يتم استخدامه في مقالة، بدون ترخيص مؤكد وقد يكون مأخوذاً من الانترنت موسى (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. probably no own work, but copyright violation 2. useless without context information GerritR (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Texture on this is probably too complex for PD-textlogo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Text per COM:TOO US. --Ciell (talk) 15:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 85.249.193.229 21:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear over the copyright vs PD-status: deleting per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. --Ciell (talk) 15:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0 nagualdesign 16:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. This is a NASA-credited image ("NASA/Tony Gray and Tim Powers"). While NASA's Flickr account tags their images as NC-ND, the images legally remain public domain as they are a work by the U.S. Federal Government. Huntster (t @ c) 17:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure about that? See NASA's Media Usage Guidelines. Seems odd that they would label images as NC-ND if all their images are PD. nagualdesign 22:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is long established. It's federal law. Their use of licenses on Flickr is not actually permissible, and they should be using the specific U.S. Government Work tag. The only restrictions are that the use of NASA material cannot imply endorsement, sponsorship, or support in any way. Huntster (t @ c) 22:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Media Usage Guidelines states, "If copyright is indicated on any NASA materials, permission should be obtained from the indicated copyright owner prior to use." In this case, that would appear to include Tony Gray and Tim Powers. nagualdesign 01:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is intended to account for NASA published materials that originate from outside the agency. These are NASA produced. Federal law states there can be no copyright protection on works produced by federal employees. Huntster (t @ c) 01:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: The Flickr account says CC-BY-NC-ND indeed, but a link is provided to the Media Usage Guidelines, https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/guidelines/index.html , which is the basis for all NASA content. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 19:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NC-ND license on Flickr, no proof that OGL overrides NC-ND license (Unless this image was posted on UK.GOV) A1Cafel (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep All works by the government are, under the terms of the PSI grant, automatically released under the OGL if they meet the requirements set out in the OGL license conditions and are created by the UK government regardless of what the Flickr license states. We've had this discussion about UK Government sourced images repeatedly—see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Olympic mascots.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canoe Slalom - Kynan Maley.jpg. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Recent DRs like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump and May in Blenheim Palace, July 2018.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Red in No. 10 Downing Street.jpg, and VP archive like Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/06#Number 10 Flickr indicates that OGL doesn't override the Flickr license. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"I don't remember the specifics" is an excellent précis of Commons users misunderstanding the terms of the OGL. The Controller's Offer and the PSI framework clearly overrides the stated license on Flickr. That's the whole reason I emailed UK government lawyers back in 2012 who confirmed as such in relation to the Olympic Mascots DR. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tom Morris: Commented at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Boris Johnson hosts virtual G7 meeting (1).jpg, probably NCGL rather than normal OGL. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And I've responded that the NCOGL point is as much a red herring as it was when it was last raised in 2012 at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canoe Slalom - Kynan Maley.jpg. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]