Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(SM_7677-7908b112z).png){kind=link}
_(SM_7677-7908b117z).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![108 File:Композиция "Дочь-Украина".jpg](#File:Композиция_"Дочь-Украина".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(SM_7677-7908b112z).png){kind=link}
_(SM_7677-7908b112z).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Press photo Flyemong (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
_(SM_7677-7908b112z).png){kind=link}
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
_(SM_7677-7908b112z).png){kind=link}
Because it is A selfie Flyemong (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Flyemong (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Flyemong (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Flyemong (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
_(SM_7677-7908b117z).png){kind=link}
_(SM_7677-7908b117z).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Random photo from internet Flyemong (talk) 18:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
_(SM_7677-7908b117z).png){kind=link}
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
_(SM_7677-7908b117z).png){kind=link}
Pollock died in 1956. This image is not public domain Coldcreation (talk) 11:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as re-upload of deleted copyvio File:Jackson-Pollock-The-She-Wolf-S.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Another in the nominator's series of indiscriminate COM:TOYS DRs without considering the age of the dolls. No prejudice against renomination by someone who has done the research and nonetheless concludes that the doll is copyrighted. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Figelvigel (talk · contribs)
[edit]File:Портрет П.Мостового.jpg, claimed to be a "own work", is a reupload of File:Peter Mostovoy photo by Maxim Stolbov.jpg. Another previously deleted file by uploader was called File:Peter Mostovoy photo byYuri Belinsky.jpg. The two other files are also claimed to be "own work" despite being way older pictures than the first.
- File:Майор Михаил Мостовой 40-50-е годы.jpg
- File:Татьяна Ольшанская 30-е годы.jpg
- File:Портрет П.Мостового.jpg
QTHCCAN (talk) 15:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy, per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
speedy declined due to "in use" - but it is only "in use" on pages that have been or will soon be deleted. Subject has been deleted/declined on numerous occasions. It wasn't even "in use" when I put up the speedy tag. Quakewoody (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No indication of free license. --Gbawden (talk) 15:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
個人情報が公開されているため 本田明星斗 (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Rebeccachild (talk) 23:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- This is no photo and it is my own work. I made it with German lettering before. Because I put it in the public domain, other people can use it everywhere. If you found it in the internet, this is the reason. Here you can see how old my images with the German lettering are: [1]. The same applies for the other two images. I make many graphics, also other inheritance patterns for example here: [2]] Sciencia58 (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 12:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015
[edit]See: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Ecuador#Stamps "Under the Intellectual Property Law (Codification No. 2006-13) there is no exception for stamps, which would be protected for 70 years from publication."
- File:Amblyrhynchus cristatus 2015 stamp of Ecuador.jpg
- File:Ceratophrys stolzmanni 2015 stamp of Ecuador.jpg
- File:Corallus batesii 2015 stamp of Ecuador.jpg
- File:Dasyatis brevis 2015 stamp of Ecuador.jpg
- File:José de Cuero y Caicedo 2015 stamp of Ecuador.jpg
- File:Paleosuchus trigonatus 2015 stamp of Ecuador.jpg
- File:Raúl Clemente Huerta 2015 stamp of Ecuador (cropped).jpg
- File:Raúl Clemente Huerta 2015 stamp of Ecuador.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-01.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-02.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-03.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-04.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-05.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-06.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-07.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-08.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-09.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-10.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-11.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-13.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-14.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-15.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-16.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-17.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-18.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-19.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-20.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-21.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-22.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-23.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-24.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-25.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-26.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-27.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-28.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-29.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-30.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-31.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-32.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-33.jpg
- File:Stamps of Ecuador, 2015-34.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and copyright violation. --Ezarateesteban 19:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
G10 / F10. Uploaded by crosswiki spammer, globally locked for now Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 02:14, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
I do some errors Lae Lae Khine (talk) 15:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; pixelated & opaque background. Have File:Zitronensäure - Citric acid.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruan Carlos Terra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two pictures of pictures and one picture of a monitor/screen. Unacceptable derivative works. These are also the uploader's only global contributions, so out of scope as well.
- File:Hugo Cantarino Garcia.jpg
- File:Hugo Cantarino Em seu Video No Youtube.jpg
- File:Hugo e seu Acordeon.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 02:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrong license, not an own work. This is a copyrighted logo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrong license, not an own work. This is a copyrighted logo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
OK, let's concentrate on scope. "Profile Consultant with Avery India ltd., JCT Electronics Ltd., Digiflex India Ltd." is not in scope, IMHO. Is he? What about the other people whose passport photos have been uploaded by the same user? E4024 (talk) 03:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Other photos also deleted. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused poor quality photo of unidentified building. No educational use. Malcolma (talk) 07:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, no educational use. Drakosh (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. On a side note, w:ru:Роман Летов has been deleted twice. --Ahmadtalk 01:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 01:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. On a side note, w:ar:على صبري على has been deleted. --Ahmadtalk 01:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Small image of plain-text equation, replaced by TeX (with improved typography of "Mg2+") DMacks (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. The opaque (white) background is another quality issue. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 08:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz - 1468534876201.jpg
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz - 20160804-WA0003.jpg
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz - 20160804-WA0006.jpg
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz - 1469767082664.jpg
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz Bhakkar.jpg
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz Layyah.jpg
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz Sahiwal.jpg
- File:Sahibzada Sultan Bahadar Aziz Okara.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HorizonsFitness (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
- File:HorizonsFitnessLogo.png
- File:Horizons Fitness - Swimming Pool.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Swimming Pool view.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Swimming Pool Entrance.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Sauna.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Change Room.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Football Playground.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Fitness Room.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Exercise Room.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Bath.jpg
- File:Horizons Fitness - Exercise Tools.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Horizon Fitness in London is run by a charity trust and its profit is used to support the primary schools under the trust management. It is located near the Van Gogh Primary school and its football playground use pupils during the exercising lessons.
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
and :
- File:Using Unstructured Interviews in Educational and Social Science Research The Process Opportunity and Difficulty.pdf
- File:Adult Education Programme.pdf
- File:Introduction-Synopsis.pdf
- File:Research Methods.pdf
- File:Teaching methods in Science.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gouriamma1919 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Gowri-amma-house.jpg.jpg
- File:Kpaclalitha.jpg.jpg
- File:Gouriamma mathrubhumi.jpg
- File:Susheela gopalanjpg.jpg
- File:Mercikuttyamma in 2020.jpg
- File:Gouriamma in office of Minister for Agriculture.jpg
- File:Gouriamma 2018.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Supermanuk (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:北陵机场机场上空拍摄北陵和市区清晰版.jpg
- File:北陵机场远眺北陵公园和市区.jpg
- File:北站cbd和市府广场恒隆中心.png
- File:雪后的故宫武功仿.jpg
- File:沈阳圣心大教堂.jpg
- File:北陵公园城楼.jpg
- File:Shenyang montage2018.jpg
- File:沈阳故宫大政殿.jpg
- File:雪后故宫的日晷.jpg
- File:北陵机场机场上空拍摄北陵和市区.png
- File:金廊工程夜景3.png
- File:中街皇城里.png
- File:五里河2.jpg
- File:金廊夜景3.jpg
- File:金廊夜景2.jpg
- File:金廊夜景.jpg
- File:三环外浑南新区.jpg
- File:21世纪广场附近.jpg
- File:21世纪广场.jpg
- File:五里河商圈.jpg
- File:奥体中心 奥体公园.jpg
- File:青年大街浑南段.jpg
- File:金廊工程2.jpg
- File:青年大街金廊工程.jpg
- File:中山路.jpg
- File:五里河茂业.jpg
- File:青年大街.jpg
- File:北站cbd.jpg
- File:五里河茂业中心.jpg
- File:市府恒隆中心.jpg
- File:雪后沈阳北站商务区cbd远景.jpg
- File:北站新地中心和市府恒隆中心.jpg
Techyan（Talk） 20:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Many of this user's pictures are missing EXIF info or see clear signs of compressions, and identical ones can be found on other websites. For example: this image can also be found here (direct link to the image), with a watermark that was cropped out. I don't believe a user who only showed up on Wikipedia in 2018 and disappeared ever since was able to upload these many "own works."
Also, some images like this one and this one, when viewed in a black background, there are white bars visible on the edges of them, indicating that they are screenshots, instead of own works.
Considering many of this user's pictures are widely used among different languages of Wikipedia, I will probably take some on myself or find alternative ones.
--Techyan（Talk） 20:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:25, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sirkitofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Syedsadi387681 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
It is not collected from Google. I think something is wrong. It is not in Google Photos. I respect all the rules of Wikipedia Commons. I am sincerely sorry that I have inadvertently infringed copyright on some of the earlier photos, but these two images are not supposed to be copyrighted. You will consider my words. I'm not very good at Wikipedia Commons. I wanted to add a very small number of pictures. Syedsadi387681 (talk) 01:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
NO FOP for sculpturs in the US. MGA73 (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused OoS signature. E4024 (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Also delete File:Roghib-sign.png please. --E4024 (talk) 15:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused user logo. E4024 (talk) 15:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vikram R. Anand (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Not freely licensed. Jcornelius (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
The foto was part of the previous Portuguese government site, and is the one also used in Wikipedia.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 13:08, 24 Oktober 2020 UTC: No license since 20-10-16 --Krdbot 21:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, poor quality, redundant, educationally worthless and therefore out of scope file. AshFriday (talk) 01:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license a all. --JuTa 07:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 07:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
extremely low quality image. Better alternative with File:N-benzylaniline.svg Rhadamante (talk) 07:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 04:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johneffay as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Begründung --Johneffay (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded more than 1 year ago, thus not speediable by uploader. In addition no reason given. Achim (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Johneffay, tell us why you want it to be deleted, so that we can consider a deletion by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 21:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Achim55, Hello Achim55, I uploaded this picture by accident. I don't want it to be either on wikipedia or google search, my reputation is on the line. I don't know how it got here exactly in the first place, I don't know how to handle this the correct way. Can you just delete it or make it offline, or at least change the name of the .jpg to johneffay instead of my real name? THANKS A LOT! --Johneffay (talk) 16:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete by courtesy, uploader's request, not in use. --Achim (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Achim55, Hello Achim55, I uploaded this picture by accident. I don't want it to be either on wikipedia or google search, my reputation is on the line. I don't know how it got here exactly in the first place, I don't know how to handle this the correct way. Can you just delete it or make it offline, or at least change the name of the .jpg to johneffay instead of my real name? THANKS A LOT! --Johneffay (talk) 16:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johneffay as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: accidentally uploaded --Johneffay (Diskussion) 19:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Johneffay (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, not notable people. --Ezarateesteban 19:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
This image is an exact duplication of File:Lorikeet Centennial Park 002.jpg. Sardaka (talk) 08:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Probably a model release, related with Indonesian Wikipedia LTA Tenny Amelia Putri RaFaDa20631 (talk) 11:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, no educational use Drakosh (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Australian logo, likely above the ToO. Low quality and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Australian logo, likely above the ToO. Not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:DW. Njzjz (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Rebeccachild (talk) 17:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- not a selfie, but a portrait (I realise this is the Android app interface); and a copyvio unless Takeshi Kimura is user Nnu-h which I doubt. --Arlo James Barnes 00:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Cross-wiki upload from ja.wikipedia.org Upload a new version of this file File usage on Commons The following page uses this file: User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2020 October 16 16:30 (talk | contribs Metadata This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong. Camera manufacturer Canon Camera model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Author
Deleted: by Dyolf77. --Minoraxtalk 05:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. If you did not create it and it is not in the public domain, you must ask the copyright holder for permission to release it under one of the allowed licenses, and the written permission must be sent to our permission archive. 79.145.112.91 18:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. 79.145.112.91 18:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. --Minoraxtalk 05:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused persinal image, out of prject scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Advertising material. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I think this is an advertisement. --Tmv (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
No evidence The Star released this image under Creative Commons Attribution. GRuban (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete because it is obviously copyrighted.-Fandi89 (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
The depicted engine is definitely not a Mercedes-Benz M139 Yellowcard (talk) 06:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Falsche Bezeichnung ist kein Löschgrund.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 10:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Giftzwerg 88: Da das Foto irreführenderweise entsprechend in Artikel eingebunden wird, haben wir jedenfalls ein Problem. Man könnte im Zweifelsfall anstelle der Löschung sicherlich auch Beschreibung und Kategorien anpassen, es müsste bloß jemand tun. Yellowcard (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
For this engine please have a look at: Mercedes-Benz M139 engine --PtrQs (talk) 16:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Fehler und Irrtümer gibt es. Wenn du denkst der Motor ist falsch identifiziert, so ist die richtige Lösung dieses in der Dateibeschreibung darzulegen ggf. das Bild umzubenennen "Unidentified AMG engine". Entsprechend müsste man es aus dem Artikel entfernen und in eine allgemeinere Kategorie "AMG Motoren" oder sowas ähnliches einsortieren. Es besteht immer die Chance, dass es jemand gibt, der den Motor identifizieren kann. Schließlich ist das ein Wiki, das auf Zusammenarbeit basiert. Man könnte es auch auf auf der Seite zur Bestimmung von Automobilen präsentieren und dort fragen, ob jemand mehr weiß. Wenn das Bild gelöscht wird, kann den Motor niemand mehr identifizieren. Der Motor ist offensichtlich in irgendeiner Form ein Ausstellungsstück und perfekt beleuchtet. Man wird diesen Motor kaum irgendwo anders besser aufnehmen können, also ist das ein hochwertiges und behaltenswertes Bild, auch wenn der Bildinhalt nicht korrekt identifiziert wurde. Niemand von uns kennt die Zukunft und was, wenn das tatsächlich ein Prototyp ist oder sonst ein Teil, das nur fünf mal + 1 Ausstellungsstück produziert wurde?--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Giftzwerg 88, das ist mir alles schon klar, bloß muss das irgendjemand tun. Ich bin auf der Suche nach Informationen zu diesem Motor auf einen Wikipedia-Artikel (de:Mercedes-Benz M 139) gestoßen, der einen V8-Motor abbildet (das in Frage stehende Foto), aber einen 4-Zylinder-Ottomotor beschreibt. Das ist ein offensichtlicher, massiv irreführender Fehler. Zu diesem Zeitpunkt hatte ich keine Zeit für Artikelarbeit. Dennoch habe ich eben das Foto aus dem Artikel entfernt bzw. gegen ein korrektes Bild ausgetuscht sowie anschließend mir das Bild selbst angesehen. Dort sah ich die fehlerhaften Informationen im Titel, in der Beschreibung und in der Kategorisierung. Für eine solche Aufräumaktion hatte ich dann nunmal erst recht keine Zeit mehr. Also blieb mir nur der schnelle Löschantrag, denn natürlich ist das Bild behaltenswert, aber in der irreführenden Form war es schlechter als gar kein Foto. Wenn auch niemand anderes die Zeit/Muße für diesen Korrekturaufwand aufbringen kann, muss das Bild halt gehen. Du hättest dieses Problem nun genauso gut lösen können, anstatt hier mit mir zu diskutieren...
- Um aber auch noch einen konstruktiven Output zu erzeugen, habe ich die Datei inzwischen umbenannt, die Kategorisierung angepasst und die Beschreibung geändert. Das nächste Mal allerdings werde ich den Fehler wohl lieber ignorieren, wenn ich gerade nur auf der schnellen Suche nach Informationen bin. Lesson learned. Gruß Yellowcard (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Was man immer machen kann, ist einen Hinweis auf den Fehler auf der Diskussionsseite geben. Damit hat man erst mal das Problem benannt, auch für den Fall, dass man später selbst noch mal der Sache nachgehen will hat man wenigstens eine Gedankenstütze. Womöglich kann auch der Fotograf nochmals Infos liefern, wo das Foto gemacht wurde.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Die Diskussionsseite einer Datei? Ja, kann man machen. Bringt aber nichts, liest nämlich keiner... Yellowcard (talk) 20:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nein, natürlich beim Artikel, der mutmaßlich ein falsches Foto enthält. Ein inhaltliches Problem im Artikel, also auf die Artikeldiskussion.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 20:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Die Diskussionsseite einer Datei? Ja, kann man machen. Bringt aber nichts, liest nämlich keiner... Yellowcard (talk) 20:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Was man immer machen kann, ist einen Hinweis auf den Fehler auf der Diskussionsseite geben. Damit hat man erst mal das Problem benannt, auch für den Fall, dass man später selbst noch mal der Sache nachgehen will hat man wenigstens eine Gedankenstütze. Womöglich kann auch der Fotograf nochmals Infos liefern, wo das Foto gemacht wurde.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Fehler und Irrtümer gibt es. Wenn du denkst der Motor ist falsch identifiziert, so ist die richtige Lösung dieses in der Dateibeschreibung darzulegen ggf. das Bild umzubenennen "Unidentified AMG engine". Entsprechend müsste man es aus dem Artikel entfernen und in eine allgemeinere Kategorie "AMG Motoren" oder sowas ähnliches einsortieren. Es besteht immer die Chance, dass es jemand gibt, der den Motor identifizieren kann. Schließlich ist das ein Wiki, das auf Zusammenarbeit basiert. Man könnte es auch auf auf der Seite zur Bestimmung von Automobilen präsentieren und dort fragen, ob jemand mehr weiß. Wenn das Bild gelöscht wird, kann den Motor niemand mehr identifizieren. Der Motor ist offensichtlich in irgendeiner Form ein Ausstellungsstück und perfekt beleuchtet. Man wird diesen Motor kaum irgendwo anders besser aufnehmen können, also ist das ein hochwertiges und behaltenswertes Bild, auch wenn der Bildinhalt nicht korrekt identifiziert wurde. Niemand von uns kennt die Zukunft und was, wenn das tatsächlich ein Prototyp ist oder sonst ein Teil, das nur fünf mal + 1 Ausstellungsstück produziert wurde?--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Yellowcard: beim nächsten mal bitte {{Fact disputed}} auf die Dateibeschreibungsseite klatschen. Dann kümmert sich jemand. Eine falsche Dateibeschreibung ist ganz klar kein Löschgrund und ein Löschantrag könnte als BNS-Verstoß aufgefasst werden. --MB-one (talk) 21:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moh farookh Ansari 12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]F10 / G10. Uploaded by crosswiki spammer, globally locked
- File:MohfarookhAnsari.jpg
- File:Moh farookh Ansari 12.jpg
- File:Moh farookh Ansari.jpg
- File:Moh farookh Ansari .jpg
Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mdd as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photographer is Marius Meijboom (1911-1998), and not unknown as initially was assumed, see also User_talk:Mdd#Franz_Ziegler. Mdd (talk) 08:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
In het afgelopen overleg op User_talk:Mdd#Franz_Ziegler is deze foto door ons toegeschreven aan Marius Meijboom (1911-1998) op grond van een interpretatie van de signatuur en vergelijkbaar werk van Marius Meijboom. Aanvankelijk heb ik hieruit afgeleid dat er daarom automatisch sprake is van een auteursrechtschending. Meerdere argumenten lijken dit echter tegen te spreken:
- Deze foto komt uit het werk Persoonlijkheden in het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in woord en beeld uit 1938 waar dit werk weliswaar is gesigneerd, maar de fotograaf blijft in het hele werk onbenoemd.
- In het hele werk Persoonlijkheden uit 1938 zijn zo'n kwart van de werken gesigneerd met minimaal een vijftal signaturen, en geen van deze fotografen staan in de tekst vermeld.
- Nu is het geval dat deze foto van Marius Meijboom uit Persoonlijkheden (1938) wel zonder voorbehoud in het nl:Biografisch Portaal gebruikt wordt, zie hier, en zoals bijvoorbeeld ook een foto van Louis Marie George Arntzenius door Godfried de Groot (1894-1963) zie hier.
In dit specifieke geval van de foto's in Persoonlijkheden uit 1938 lijkt hier sprake van het zogenaamde opdrachtgeversauteursrecht, zie ook hier. Mijn interpretatie is dat de portretten in 1938 in opdracht zijn vervaardigd met het doel om bekendheid te geven, en wellicht betaald door de opdrachtgever en/of de directe betrokkenen. Dit kan gezien worden als een geval van opdrachtgeversauteursrecht, of als fictief makerschap die stelt dat "als de eerste publicatie van een werk door een rechtspersoon gebeurt "als van haar afkomstig" en uw naam als 'creator'/natuurlijk persoon daarbij niet vermeldt wordt, die rechtspersoon geldt als de maker." bron.
Zo zijn er allerlei overwegingen om deze foto, die waarschijnlijk is toe te schrijven aan de fotograaf, niet meteen als een auteursrechtschending te bestempelen. -- Mdd (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The names of the photographers are indeed mentioned in the colophon. There is no evidence that they have waived their rights, so the images are not guaranteed to be copyright-free. Gouwenaar (talk) 19:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Bedankt, hiermee wordt me een en ander duidelijk:
- In dat Colophon worden inderdaad de namen van de fotografen genoemd, in dit geval "Foto-Atelier M. C. Meyboom te Amsterdam". Dat had ik zelf niet gevonden, en hiermee vervallen m'n eerste argumenten. Zo kan er dus ook geen sprake zijn van fictief makerschap.
- Dat het Biografisch Portaal de afbeeldingen wel online aanbiedt is bij nader inzien ook niet van belang: Op grond van het citaatrecht mogen ze dat gewoon doen.
- Dat de geportretteerden in "Persoonlijkheden" (1938) betaalde voor opname wordt overigens wel in een NRC artikel uit 1991 bevestigd, zie hier. Deze mensen hadden meegewerkt, maar zijn geen van allen te zien als de opdrachtgever.
- De doorslaggevende factor is dat de fotografen toch wel met naam genoemd zijn in de bron, en dat de specifieke foto is gesigneerd. Zo kom ik ook tot Delete, en mag deze nominatie wat mij betreft ook gesloten worden. -- Mdd (talk) 22:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Bedankt, hiermee wordt me een en ander duidelijk:
- Verwijderd Multichill (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Sculptor en:Philip Jackson (sculptor) (still living) must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Iraq. E4024 (talk) 02:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Is the photo really taken in Iraq? It does not show the final position of the artwork. In the last years Kamal works in Germany and Sweden. The bust on its final pedestal is shown here: Presentation in Iraq. -- Temdor (talk) 17:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, obviously taken at the same day of installation. -- Temdor (talk) 18:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ethiopia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No FoP in Ethiopia. Looks more modern than the 1970s. Previous DR is for the same image. Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ethiopia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ethiopia A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No FoP in Ethiopia, previous DR was for the same image. Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Painting of Antonino Sartini
[edit]Antonino Sartini died in 1954. Therefore we can't have his paintings here until 2020. If the photos were released by the copyright holder, then we need OTRS permission. This request is about all photos of paintings from the category Category:Antonino Sartini. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
@Podzemnik, Hi Podzemnik there is no problem. If you wish I can give you the OTRS permision of the owners of the paintings by Antonino Sartini. But I need two weeks to be sure to get it. See you. --Ilcultoredarte (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ilcultoredarte Superb, thanks. If you manage to get the permission and send it via OTRS, I'm happy to help with categorizing the paintings and inserting a proper description etc. All the best, --Podzemnik (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
@Podzemnik, Hi Podzemnik. The owner of the paintings by Sartini who also owns the antoninosartini.altervista.org site has added an internet page (https://antoninosartini.altervista.org/copyright/), where he says that: "Tutti i contenuti di queste pagine del sito antoninosartini.altervista.org, sono distribuiti con licenza licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione – Condividi allo stesso modo 3.0 Unported." (All the contents of these pages of the antoninosartini.altervista.org site are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.) So now everyone can take photos from this site, as it is written on this site: https: //it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OTRS/Procedura_2. See you.--Ilcultoredarte (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Not really sure what happened with this. --Missvain (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
False claims, false license. (Might be old PD illustration, but factual information needed to determine that.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
False claims, false license. (Might or might not be PD or free licensed for some reason, but factual information needed to determine that.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
False claims, false license. (Might be old PD illustration, but factual information needed to determine that.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Very dubious license claim Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal file; out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Sorry, I wrote "unused" by mistake; the user who created it has made a gallery on userpage. Their personal activities are not of concern to me, but people may take this as a serious flag proposal and use innocently. We should not assist this kind of mistakes. IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 01:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message, but it's not my upload, I only did some corrections of the photo. I'm neutral in this. --Cart (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
In the Copyright Act of Canada, we can read this at 32.2 (1):
- It is not an infringement of copyright
[...](b) for any person to reproduce, in a painting, drawing, engraving, photograph or cinematographic work[...](ii) a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship or a cast or model of a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, that is permanently situated in a public place or building; - It is base on this claim that I thought I could publish these pictures, and it is base on that same claim that the work is published here : La médecine à Québec under CC-BY-SA 4.0. The work is actually permanently situated in the entrance hall of the building. In any case, if Commons rules are differents I will respect them as it should. --Cephas (talk) 11:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it is permanently situated in a public place, but it is not a sculpture. (Oof, the photo of this place brings many memories. I have been walking through this entrance hall almost every day for many years. ... A long time ago.) -- Asclepias (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
missing verifiable source info, unclear if the author is actually unknown, which would invalidate the PD-anon-70-EU claim. See also: w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 September 28#File:Francisque Gay.png FASTILY 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- As you can see [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], there are no indications about authors' names. In the absence of any further information, we cannot say that these photos are copyrighted. --Guise (talk) 08:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Is eBay really the most credible source? Are there any academic publications that can be used to verify the license information? -FASTILY 08:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- About File:Francisque Gay.png, detail of this photograph (1946), the site of the Archives départementales of Seine-Saint-Denis claims : "Auteur : non id." [9].
- In contrast, I couldn't find any information about the other pictures. --Guise (talk) 00:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Is eBay really the most credible source? Are there any academic publications that can be used to verify the license information? -FASTILY 08:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
advertising/spam, no educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Low res image of aircraft, better ones at Category:Boeing 787 of Ethiopian Airlines. Minoraxtalk 07:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Herkunft unbekannt, Copyright Snoopy1964 (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/domaci/1526936-v-terezine-se-umiralo-i-po-osvobozeni-nacisty-vystridal-tyfus Jan Myšák (talk) 09:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata. Uploader is himself depicted (on the right). I suspect not own work. OTRS-permission from real photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, author is unclear, file page includes "Source=Own work, Author=Anonymous" Verbcatcher (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Found online dated before upload here,[10] although a date on a self-hosted blog is not definitive. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Platina blonde hair.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Female breasts 75d.jpg, for files from the same uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons isn't a place to host random personal photos. --Missvain (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused near duplicate of File:Vav poison Showcase.png. ƏXPLICIT 12:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy DavidZ2020 (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Better late than never. Delete E4024 (talk) 02:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Source video is unavailable, so it cannot be determined whether or not the source video was released into the Creative Commons. Thus, copyright status is dubious. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Non più necessaria — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.151.251.105 (talk • contribs) 09:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. it:Nicola Fabiano was 4 times deleted, apparently he is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Jean Cardot died in 2020. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:182E:9E8:E115:77EC 13:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by a sockpuppet. See Category:Sockpuppets of Peluches extronidos and Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Peluches extronidos
QTHCCAN (talk) 13:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Low-res photo with huge frame. More likely to be a screenshot than an original photograph. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
As told in the picture's name and even at the linked source, this picture was not taken by Koppitz (+1936) (as claimed in the original 'author' and categorization), but by Willy Zielke (1902-1989). Therefore the permission "This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer." is not appropriate any more. Wether discussion nor categorizing in Copyright_deletion_requests did start any process, so I'll try this way. PtrQs (talk) 15:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2008. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
And also File:Скульптура "Дочь - Украина".jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський Микола Василечко (talk) 15:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
![15:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/10/16#c-Микола_Василечко-2020-10-16T15:23:00.000Z-File:Композиция_"Дочь-Украина".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
![19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/10/16#c-Missvain-2020-12-02T19:15:00.000Z-File:Композиция_"Дочь-Украина".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
The above argument is pure nonsense, and clearly an attempt to censure the public's access to viewing this statue, I assume for politicial reasons.
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2006. No Permission from the sculptors Микола Обезюк та Петро Дроздовський. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Виходячі з вашої логіки за кожним фото цього пам'ятника треба ходити питати в скульпторів? Нехай тоді на сторінці вісить пустий текст... мабуть буде вельми цікаво переглядати... User talk:Plokhish 22:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Promotional logo, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Promotional image, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Promotional logo, not used in any content pages. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Promotional logo, not used in any content pages. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I dont want to share it anymore Yoyoman324 (talk) 16:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't know if this is a selfie or not, all the same a personal image left by a one-time-only visitor, years ago. No use around. Certainly this is one of those many files we have always speedy deleted as "unused personal file" and AFAIK we do not make positive discrimination here to blond women with coloured eyes. Unused personal image, that's it. E4024 (talk) 16:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
In Google I found an Iranian academic called Atieh Hassani, co-writer of a scholarly article (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319133157_Improvement_of_methane_storage_in_nitrogen_boron_and_lithium_doped_pillared_graphene_A_hybrid_molecular_simulation) but no idea if this is her. I will ping User:4nn1l2 because we cannot leave her uncategorized. She is either in scope and we categorize her or delete the image instead of adding it to "category:Unidentified women". E4024 (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Even if the depicted person is indeed a researcher or lecturer, she must be very obscure, because I couldn't find her in the first 20 results of Google search. By the way, she is not the scientist who has co-written this scientific article about nitrogen, boron and lithium. Delete as out of scope. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep "Not in use" is not a valid rationale. Nor is "unidentified" (which is itself odd, given that the filename clearly identifies her. en:WP:BLPN applies at Wikipedia, but it does not apply at Commons. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)- Delete per 4nn1l2. (I am the nominator.) --E4024 (talk) 00:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Commons isn't a personal webhost. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Dalibor Krutiš http://znojemsky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/cermakovicky-unikat-statek-habanu-20141008.html Radek Linner (talk) 18:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 18:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
It‘s my picture (and a very old one) and I would like it deleted Marv1304 (talk) 18:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope, not used in any content pages. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sedgwickhq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images, not used anywhere.
Ixfd64 (talk) 19:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Promotional logo, not used in any content pages. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Promotional logo, not used in any content pages. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Image sous copyright Evynrhud (talk) 19:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Unsplash photo published after 2017, license is too restrictive for Commons: https://unsplash.com/photos/4h-fVxH9BOI Ytoyoda (talk) 13:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Image sous copyright Evynrhud (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete An Unsplash photo uploader after 2017, license is too restrictive for Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:wallpaperflare
[edit]Wallpaperflare typically takes images from other platforms like Pixabay and strip out source information. There's no clear guidance on licensing and since they are not the original posters of photos, license cannot be verified.
- File:United-states-boston-logan-airport-terminal-a.jpg
- File:The Sheldon Building at St. Paul's School (New Hampshire).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: thank you for identifying this issue. I've looked at the file I uploaded (File:The Sheldon Building at St. Paul's School (New Hampshire).jpg) and added other sourcing as it was originally uploaded to a website permitting free re-use. I'm not sure about the other file here, though. -Editchi (talk) 00:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Editchi: Thanks for finding the original. Unfortunately though, Unsplash’s current license puts restrictions on sale and storage of their files, which too restrictive for Commons. Now, images published before 2017 are fine (see Template:Unsplash) but it looks like this one was uploaded in 2018. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This image is not the uploader's own work. The same image is widely available all over the internet in higher resolutions. Mosbatho (talk) 20:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support and, on the Wikipedia side, replace with a properly-tagged low-resolution non-free image until free alternatives (= photograph of the completed ship) become available. Tupsumato (talk) 22:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
The artist (person in the photo) asked me to remove this image and plans to replace it with something current. I took this photo, uploaded it and now I would like it removed. Amcecil (talk) 20:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
File:This is the logo of ALPA that has been in use since June 2020. It is a yellow background followed by ALPA in black, with 'fresh groceries' under it.jpg
[edit]
Hoax, not a real organization, picture unlikely to ever be used. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a fake image of newspaper. The real one looks different. — putnik 21:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/12623784/villa-watkins-brentford-record-33m/ Remy34 (talk) 21:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Maurice Cardon died in 2002. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:8062:87A1:9C8F:3D26 21:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Maurice Cardon died in 2002. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:8062:87A1:9C8F:3D26 21:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Maurice Cardon died in 2002. No OTRS, no freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 2.jpg
- File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 3.jpg
- File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 4.jpg
- File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 6.jpg
- File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 7.jpg
- File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 8.jpg
- File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 9.jpg
- File:Héloïse ou… la fille des Trois-Rivières, Maurice Cardon (1992).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Chassipress (talk) 22:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I nominated the first one of these, Neelofa.jpg, for deletion separately, but now see the user uploaded two other images from newspapers and websites with no evidence they were Creative Commons licensed.
- File:Neelofa.jpg
- File:Rap-hawa2 HMfield image listing featured v2.webp
- File:Hannah-delisha-30-pesanan-suara-2019-drama.jpg
GRuban (talk) 23:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete because copryright restriction are applied to them.-Fandi89 (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Complex logo above the threshold of originality. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
он загружен дважды Georgi Makaveli (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
он загружен дважды Georgi Makaveli (talk) 11:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment I have requested OTRS permissions for this photo. We'll see what happens and proceed accordingly. Missvain (talk) 19:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
la licence proposéee ({{PD-USGov}} précise formellement : « Attention : Ceci ne concerne que le travail du Gouvernement Fédéral et pas celui des États, ou d’une autre subdivision géographique ou politique du pays. », or ce timbre est utilisé exclusivement à Fort Apache (Arizona). Se pose donc la question de savoir s'il s'agit du « travail du Gouvernement Fédéral » ou du travail d'un « État, ou d’une autre subdivision géographique ou politique du pays » indépendamment de ce qui se trouve sur WP (y compris en Anglais). Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ce timbre, emis en 1867, est utilisé exclusivement depuis Fort Apache. En 1873, les troupes américaines sur ce territoire étaient en pleine guerre contre les Indiens natifs. Ce timbre fut probablement imprimé sur place (Fort Apache) et circula sur ce territoire qui était trop éloigné de la capitale, où les timbres étaient émis. Le 14 février 1912, l'Arizona est devenu le 48e État de l'Union américaine. --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 14:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Um no, that is not any of this works. The stamp was issued by the US government for official uses, in this case for War Department business. The Army would have sent a package of stamps from DC out to Arizona Territory and used those on official mail coming from the fort, but location of usage does not affect a stamp's copyright status. The fragment of postmark has no artistic element to it and so there is no copyright attaching to it. Stan Shebs (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Obvious PD for various reasons due to copyright license {{PD-USGov}} and age. Ww2censor (talk) 00:55, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Miscategorized duplicate of this file with a same quality. Main problem here is that it's used by plenty of wikipedias with a wrong attribution and I see no other way than deletion. Красный wanna talk? 20:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicate and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Jean Bazaine is dead in 2001. No freedom of panorama in France. 83.204.162.151 23:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- As the originator, I (of course) raise no objection to the deletion of this file if it violates French copyright law. I was interested in the pillar, which is certainly out of copyright, but the windows are clearly included and I can see that could make the picture problematic.. Seglea (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Neither of the windows is shown in its entirety. I think we can treat this as de minimis. The church itself is 15th century, so the pillar is not a problem. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation of the stained glass windows, designed by Jean René Bazaine who died in 2001. No freedom of panorama in France, see COM:FOP France Verbcatcher (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I has not notice that this had been nominated before. However, I think the de minimis conclusion should be revisited. This file is in Category:Jean Bazaine and it is used as an illustration of the stained glass artists' work in several Wikipedia articles.
- Commons:De minimis says that a work is less likely to satisfy de minimis if "the file is in use to illustrate X" or if "the file is categorised in relation to X". Verbcatcher (talk) 14:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, I don't agree, the stained glasses are in the background, not shown entirely and even blurred: it does satisfy "De minimis". --Daehan (talk) 18:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Commons:De minimis says:
- It may be relevant how the image is described or classified: it will be difficult to argue de minimis if the photograph is described as illustrating "an advertising poster" and is placed within the category Advertising posters.
- The file description is "Stained glass by Jean Bazaine (1904-2001) and Pillar in the shape of a palm tree at the Church of Saint-Séverin (Paris)", and it is in Category:Jean Bazaine. Also, the inclusion if the windows "makes the image more attractive, more usable". The photo could be edited to totally blur the windows or replace them with an image of a stone wall, but this make the picture less attractive and less usable. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Verbcatcher,
- If we remove the description, the Jean Bazaine category and any mention of its author, it would alright, right? --Daehan (talk) 06:07, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- In my view this would be insufficient, and the use in Wikipedia articles to illustrate Jean Bazaine and Henri Déchanet's stained glass designs might be fatal to a de minimis case. I know that Commons is operated independently of the Wikipedias, but they are all operated by the the Wikimedia Foundation, and part of our role is to help protect the foundation from claims of copyright violation. In my view the windows should be blocked out or more blurred, possibly to simulate the narrow depth-of-focus of a large aperture camera lens. The modified file should be uploaded under a different name so that the image is deleted from the artists' Wikipedia pages. However, the closing admin may take a different view. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Commons:De minimis says:
- Hello, I don't agree, the stained glasses are in the background, not shown entirely and even blurred: it does satisfy "De minimis". --Daehan (talk) 18:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that the description and its frequent use as an illustration of Jean Bazaine's artwork means that the stained glass is a significant component of the image, exceeding de minimis. -M.nelson (talk) 21:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, I personally agree the stained glass windows as shown are not de minimis . Elly (talk) 21:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)