Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Lisanslandırılması bitecek. Gerekli değil. Caskination (talk) 01:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Fil: Artprojektas.lt (11) .jpg Trondheim.no.kamel (talk) 04:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Why? Deletion-rationale is missing. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted Alexander Grøtte isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, da.wiki, no.wiki nor in nn.wiki. Unused photo about non-notabile person, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lazada.mits (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission
- File:Khô Rắn 5.jpg
- File:Khô Rắn 4.jpg
- File:Khô Rắn 3.jpg
- File:Khô Rắn 2.jpg
- File:Khô Rắn 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Úc 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 8.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Úc 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 7.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 6.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 5.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Tra 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Sặc 7.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Sặc 6.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Sặc 5.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Sặc 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Sặc 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Sặc 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Rô Phi 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Sặc 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Rô Phi 5.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Rô Phi 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Rô Phi 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Rô Phi 2.jpg
Minoraxtalk 11:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) + COM:SPAM (uploader marketing sock). --Эlcobbola talk 14:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alantran284 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission
- File:Khô Cá Kèo 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Kèo 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Dứa 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Dứa 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Dứa 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Dứa 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 11.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 10.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 9.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 8.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 7.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 6.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 5.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chạch (1) 01.jpg
Minoraxtalk 11:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Aren't these pictures the own work by the uploader as claimed? --AFBorchert (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: EXIF leads to this website and 3 other users claims similar files as own work, see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Trungtintrandt. --Minoraxtalk 12:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing this out! Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: EXIF leads to this website and 3 other users claims similar files as own work, see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Trungtintrandt. --Minoraxtalk 12:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) + COM:SPAM (uploader marketing sock). --Эlcobbola talk 14:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trungtintrandt (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission
- File:Khô Cá Mối 11.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 10.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 9.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 8.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 7.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 6.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 5.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Mối 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lưỡi Trâu 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 11.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 10.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 9.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 8.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 7.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 6.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 5.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Lù Đù 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Khoai 5.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Khoai 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Khoai 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Khoai 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Khoai 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Đuối 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Đuối 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Đuối 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Đối 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Đối 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Đối 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Điêu Hồng 4.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Điêu Hồng 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Điêu Hồng 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Điêu Hồng 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chốt 3.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chốt 2.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chốt 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chỉ Vàng 1.jpg
- File:Khô Cá Chỉ Vàng 2.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) + COM:SPAM (uploader marketing sock). --Эlcobbola talk 14:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Vanity picture, mirror selfie. Out of scope for Commons Timtrent (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 07:41, 24 September 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 14:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this is really the uploaders own work. File:550A9784-2.jpg is a redirect to this file --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
https://www.andreasemmert.com/referenzen-fotografie/ --Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, (C) Andreas Emmert. --Túrelio (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Bad- meta data - Delete unless someone wants to rebuild the infobox with the correct information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: infobox fixed. --clpo13(talk) 23:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Favorite books of well known people when they were boys and girls. (IA favoritebooksofw00dave).pdf
[edit]Bad- meta data - Delete unless someone wants to rebuild the infobox with the correct information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: infobox fixed. --clpo13(talk) 23:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Bad- meta data - Delete unless someone wants to rebuild the infobox with the correct information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: infobox fixed. --clpo13(talk) 23:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Bad- meta data - Delete unless someone wants to rebuild the infobox with the correct information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: infobox fixed. --clpo13(talk) 23:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Bad- meta data - Delete unless someone wants to rebuild the infobox with the correct information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep I fixed this one. The IA metadata seems to belong to a Disney board book called Best Friends (OCLC 1157188270). clpo13(talk) 21:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. - You might want to check my other recent DR's as well. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn; infobox fixed. --clpo13(talk) 23:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
nol-skol Y28H eOli (talk) 06:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". Delete. --E4024 (talk) 18:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
non-skol Y28H eOli (talk) 06:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". Delete. --E4024 (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-skol Мотешето Авакаито (talk) 09:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
[[COM:DW}DW]] of the poster; unlikely to be covered by Australian FoP. Ankry (talk) 06:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Josve05a at 18:51, 24 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): ticket:2020092410003942 --Krdbot 08:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Private photo SENE to CIA to ? (talk) 16:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:55, 24 September 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 08:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
No source, without permission, incorrect license (uploader isn't author)... Kizule (talk) 03:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial sport club logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
the source https://www.choicegreece.com/en/news/a-tribute-to-afroessa-the-boat-of-the-former-king-constantine is not mentioned on wikipedia Jeanatos (talk) 19:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:18, 25 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 08:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
the source https://www.choicegreece.com/en/news/a-tribute-to-afroessa-the-boat-of-the-former-king-constantine is not mentioned on wikipedia Jeanatos (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:18, 25 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 08:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
the source https://www.choicegreece.com/en/news/a-tribute-to-afroessa-the-boat-of-the-former-king-constantine is not mentioned on wikipedia Jeanatos (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:18, 25 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 08:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-selfie photo with false "own work" claimed by its object according to description. Tatewaki (talk) 22:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Фотография находится в свободном доступе в интернете и не нарушает авторских прав, удалять её нет необходимости JugglerLeshik (talk) 13:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Translating the reasoning of uploader for users without active Russian language (default language of discussions in Commons is English): "The photo is freely available in internet and does not infringe author rights, there is no need to delete it". Explanation for the uploader: Commons allows only images available as "free content" - please see the thorough explanation what this means by rules on a page by this link. "Freely available in internet" by default do not correspond to these requirements. Also, the description very likely gives false information on authorship since it claims Alexei Kolykhalov both as an object and author of this photo which definitely wasn't made as a selfie (even if he gave his own camera to a passerby on a road, the author is this passerby).Tatewaki (talk) 08:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Source (campaign website) clearly says "all rights reserved" at bottom of webpage Woko Sapien (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 02:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE and concerns in regard to COM:PEOPLE. AFBorchert (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 10:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 12:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Italian newspaper page of 1991. No problem? Ruthven? E4024 (talk) 23:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation: book cover is copyrighted Blue Sonic (talk) 00:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 03:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 03:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
While this page shows actually nothing, this photo is not suitable for pages, kids can see. This is higly sexualised and suggestive clearly porn-star photo, that is no means neutral, and I don*t want to see this kind of photos in my searched either. Don't fit wikimedia / wikipedia and should not belong here. 91.225.69.21 06:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep: No valid deletion rationale provided. Nominator should read COM:CENSORSHIP. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)- Speedy keep: Non valid deletion rationale
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 04:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Don't belong to wikipedia / wikimeida, where kids can see this kind of photos. This is adults only kind of situation and photo and should not pop-up in general searches. While little less provocative than other still clearly a porn star, is not used in Wikipedia and no way important. 91.225.69.21 06:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: No valid deletion rationale provided. Nominator should read COM:CENSORSHIP. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 04:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Do this kind of porn-star photos really belong to wikipedia / wikimedia, which is open to kids to read and serach? This popped up when I was searching historical carters. The nuditu factor is not the important - the way she poses is. Clearly ment for adults only. Also highly unlikely this is for free use. 91.225.69.21 06:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: No valid deletion rationale provided. Nominator should read COM:CENSORSHIP. Also, this photo has received COM:OTRS verification, so the claim that it is "unlikely this is for free use" is false. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 04:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
This is kids also platform. This is not for kids photo. While there is not reael nudity, this is highly sexualised and from adult only situation - and clearly ment for adults only. Also it is not used anywhere in wikimedias 91.225.69.21 06:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: No valid deletion rationale provided. Nominator should read COM:CENSORSHIP. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Image is well within project scope. See also Commons:What Commons is not - Nicoli Maege (talk) 03:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 04:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 06:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Galushka123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 07:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
File:2020-05-06 04 59 42 Outer packaging of an Maruchan Instant Lunch Chicken Flavor Ramen Noodle Soup in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.
- File:2020-05-06 04 59 42 Outer packaging of an Maruchan Instant Lunch Chicken Flavor Ramen Noodle Soup in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2020-05-06 05 02 03 Outer packaging of an Maruchan Instant Lunch Beef Flavor Ramen Noodle Soup in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 07:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 07:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ching's Secret
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.
- File:Ching's Instant Noodles - Chowmein, Manchurian, Schezwan & Hot Garlic.jpg
- File:Ching's Secret Sauces - Soy, Red Chilli & Green Chilli.jpg
- File:Ching's Secret Schezwan Chutney.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 10:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alaeldin Abdalla Mohamed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newspapers. No evidence of permission.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Dispute that the uploader has permission to release this under stated licence. Upload was made after the photo was available elsewhere online (https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/28/2617/5875680) so suspected copyvio. MIDI (talk) 10:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Professional portrait at link provided by nominator and no OTRS verification. No evidence photo has been released under the stated license. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope images. Screenshots of text from web.
- File:تاريخ ميلاد الرسول محمد صلى الله عليه والنسبة الذهبية للكون والحياة والمخلوقات.jpg
- File:تاريخ ميلاد الرسول محمد صلى الله عليه.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Convenience food
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.
ƏXPLICIT 10:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope text document. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
File:2019-10-29 21 29 04 The box for a Screamin' Sicilian Bessie's Revenge Cheese Pizza in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 10:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 10:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Serdar - Muc Habitat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Given their usage on fr.wp it seems likely that the source of these images is https://www.muc-habitat.fr/. The website clearly holds copyright of the images there. As such these would need licensing via COM:OTRS for us to continue hosting them.
- File:Maison à toit plat 1.jpg
- File:Maison à toit plat 3.jpg
- File:Maison à toit plat 2.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00008.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00007.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00006.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00005.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00001.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00004.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00003.jpg
- File:Crayonne et 3D chantier maison neuve alsace00002.jpg
- File:Croquis maison alsace encadré.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00008.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00009.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00007.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00006.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00005.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00004.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00003.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00002.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace00001.jpg
- File:Croquis Maison a toit plat alsace ver.jpg
- File:Crayonn‚ maison alsace.jpg
- File:Photo de côté.jpg
- File:Photo arrière de côté.jpg
- File:Photo-arrière.jpg
- File:Photo avant.jpg
Herby talk thyme 10:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Useless too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]They looking all fairly out of scope to me.
- File:Belandūr Tank 14.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 13.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 12.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 11.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 7.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 10.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 6.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 5.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 9.jpg
- File:CV Raman Nagar.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 4.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 3.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 7.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 6.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 5.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 4.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 3.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 2.jpg
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as recreation of already-deleted material. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these images are either out of scope or displaying copyrighted product packaging.
- File:Test 8.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 2.jpg
- File:QSt.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Sondekoppa 2.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 2.jpg
- File:Sondekoppa.jpg
- File:Sri Chamrājendra Reservoir 2.jpg
- File:Sri Chamrājendra Reservoir.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank.jpg
JuTa 13:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality nonsense / test uploads. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:National Public School, Indiranagar.jpg
- File:Indian Airlines Flight 605.jpg
- File:Wikidata edit test upload.jpg
- File:Test blurred image.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 2.jpg
- File:Hello world 2.jpg
- File:Hello world.jpg
- File:Test 11.jpg
- File:Multiple uploads 2.jpg
- File:Multiple uploads.jpg
- File:Iterm terminal.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Test uploads, out of scope. The uploader has a long list of such uploads (misleading titles and descriptions, testing, out of scope), some of which they nominated for deletion themselves, others were later recreated. What is it that they keep testing I don't know.
- File:Harrison Middleton University 5.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University 4.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University 3.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University.png
- File:Test 8.jpg
- File:Test image .jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Test 11.jpg
- File:Test 10.jpg
- File:The New School for the Arts and Academics 2.jpg
- File:The New School for the Arts and Academics.jpg
- File:Vivi.jpeg
- File:University Theatre.png
Minoraxtalk 12:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
The file will be deleted. 2605:A000:F68D:8600:88BB:7090:8ED9:5088 17:12, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 13:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry for my file behavior. RevereLocal (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete Per nomination RevereLocal (talk) 12:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion by a new sockpuppet with the old rationale. Tm (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 04:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amitkitanika (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 12:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
duplicate of File:NAJDA-172-0021 訂正出雲風土記1.pdf 維基小霸王 (talk) 15:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 04:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Contemarcopilla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Conte Marco Pilla villa Cremonesi.jpg
- File:Conte Marco Pilla libreria Cremonesi.jpg
- File:Conte Marco Pilla intervista archivio storico araldico.jpg
- File:Conte Marco Pilla Rotary club.jpg
- File:Conte Marco Pilla intervista eccellenze italiane in tv.jpg
- File:Conte Marco Pilla EXPO Milano.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Huzaifaans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Huzaifa ansari roof.jpg
- File:Huzaifa ansari rooftop.jpg
- File:Garden clicks.jpg
- File:Nature loves.jpg
- File:Park photography.jpg
- File:At the home.jpg
- File:Parks photography.jpg
- File:Lightroom.jpg
- File:Enhancing.jpg
- File:Featuring.jpg
- File:Huzaifa ansari.jpg
Minoraxtalk 15:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
unused COM:PENIS
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Low quality, easily replaced. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
"Own work" claim is dubious —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - looks like a derivative to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 18:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy, uploader request. --E4024 (talk) 00:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy, re-upload. (Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own "work".) Please check previous user edits about this and other files they themselves DR'ed or proposed speedy deletion (and certain contributions in TPs). There is an overall trollish attitude. --E4024 (talk) 13:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Book cover, no permission via OTRS. Harold (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". No scope either. E4024 (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope. personal quotation of no particular usage or notability BriefEdits (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope. personal quotation of no particular usage or notability BriefEdits (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". On his userpage but not a real user, either. E4024 (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope. personal quotation of no particular usage or notability BriefEdits (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope. Thomas Edison quotation attached to a photo of a random person. BriefEdits (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
seems racist to be honest. Out of scope quotation using the generic Facebook text to image generator. Per COM:NOTUSED and COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 21:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused logo AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Post 1925/6 works, Not US government... Delete unless can be shown copyright was not renewed on each work..
- File:American cinematographer. (Vol. 32, 1951) (IA americancinemato32unse).pdf
- File:American cinematographer. (Vol. 34, 1953) (IA americancinemato34unse).pdf
- File:American cinematographer. (Vol. 35, 1954) (IA americancinemato35unse).pdf
- File:A born nurse (IA bornnurse00lock).pdf
- File:A critique of logical positivism. (IA critiqueoflogica00joad).pdf
- File:History of Jones County, Georgia, for one hundred years, specifically 1807-1907 (IA historyofjonesco00will).pdf
- File:How to "ceramize" for pleasure and profit; (IA howtoceramizefor00warn).pdf
- File:Kinematograph Year Book 1950 (IA kinematographyea37unse).pdf
- File:Motion Picture Daily (Apr-Jun 1958) (IA motionpicturedai83unse 0).pdf
- File:Movieland. (Vol. 7, Feb. 1949-Jan. 1950) (IA movielandtvtimev07unse).pdf
- File:Poems. (IA poems00mcmi 0).pdf
- File:The Radio Annual and Television Yearkbook, 1959 (IA radioa00radi).pdf
- File:The Radio Annual and Television Yearbook, 1957 (IA radioann00radi).pdf
- File:The Radio Annual and Television Yearbook, 1953 (IA radioannualt00radi).pdf
- File:The Record Changer (IA recordchanger09unse).pdf
- File:The Record Changer (IA recordchanger11unse).pdf
- File:Rhythmical treasure. (IA rhythmicaltreasu00hard).pdf
- File:Screenland Plus TV-Land (Jul 1959-May 1960) (IA screenlandplustv61unse).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Useless too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Useless too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo, currently unused, appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. AFBorchert (talk) 12:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asminsk771 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:-File-Phonepe customer care 7605824405--7605824405..jpg
- File:Phonepe customer care 7605824405--7605824405.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felipe Yate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Instructivo licencias de uso en la plataforma FLICKR.pdf
- File:Instructivo de búsqueda y selección de imágenes con licencias de uso.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
http://www.hanban.com/chinese-culture/chinese-zodiac/chinese-zodiac-sign-rooster.html E4024 (talk) 18:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, complex logo. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues outside Staples Center
[edit]These works found outside w:Staples Center are not covered by COM:FOP US and therefore protected by copyright, as they depict statues that were built no earlier than 1998.
- File:Gretzky statue staples.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 003.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 004.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 005.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 006.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 007.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 008.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 009.jpg
- File:Los Angeles - Staples Center 010.jpg
- File:Shaquille Oneal Staples Center.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 04:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hyundai Department Store
[edit]Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.
- File:170219 Daegu.jpg
- File:Department store in korea - Hyundai department store in Apgujung (현대백화점 압구정본점).jpg
- File:Department store in korea - Hyundai department store night view in Apgujung (현대백화점 압구정본점 야경).jpg
- File:Hyundai Department Store Bucheon.jpg
- File:Hyundai department store Busan branch 20090222.jpg
- File:Hyundai Department Store Cheonho branch 20081102.jpg
- File:Hyundai department store Cheonho branch 20180914 132602.jpg
- File:Hyundai department store Daegu branch 20161011 165324.jpg
- File:HyundaiDept01.jpg
- File:HyundaiDept02.jpg
- File:HyundaiDept03.jpg
- File:HyundaiDept06.jpg
- File:HyundaiDept07.jpg
- File:현대아울렛 가산점.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 06:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Explicit: any idea who the architect is so we can add the relevant undelete in .... category to this page? Multichill (talk) 09:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Why? They are not Panmunjom buildings (to which 1. too simple and 2. North Korea has), so there's no doubt for their NoFOP properties. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata & possible flickr washing Minoraxtalk 07:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 07:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Pratham Sudhir Hegde. 3 files can be kept if source/permission is verified. Other 2 images of subject is out of scope.
- File:Pratham S Hegde.jpg
- File:Sri Devam Nirvanam Dethaha.jpg
- File:Sri Chamundeshwari Palayaman.jpg
- File:Pratham Sudhir Hegde.jpg
- File:Prelude no. 5 from 6 preludes and Fugues.ogg
Minoraxtalk 08:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files were deleted before, see the previous DR. Uploader removed the speedy tag so I think that they should be brought here for discussion. 1 is an obvious screenshot and other is a selfie of the subject (who isn’t the uploader). Permission needed.
Minoraxtalk 10:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Devie Neithiyar 002.jpg
- File:Siddhi Group.jpg
- File:Devie Neithiyar 003.jpg
- File:Devie Neithiyar 001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Athoynilima (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Contrada Trivio, Anagni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Sciarra Colonna.jpg
- File:Caridinale Colonna.jpg
- File:Rievocazione Storica, "Il sogno di Innocenzo III".jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused COM:PENIS
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.
ƏXPLICIT 02:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyviol (facebook page of Partito Democratico is not a free source) Holapaco77 (talk) 05:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyviol (facebook page of Partito Democratico is not a free source) Holapaco77 (talk) 05:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons is not wikipedia. Out of scope. Minoraxtalk 08:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- This page must be kept. It is a gallery like other galleries which you can visit like Isaac Newton is J.S. Bach. So if there are any changes that can be made please let me know. talk
- See COM:Galleries#When to create a gallery. It is unknown whether the subject is notable. --Minoraxtalk 11:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not have any notability requirements according to my knowledge. Please correct me if I am wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucas256 (talk • contribs)
- see Commons:Project scope/Pages, galleries and categories. --Minoraxtalk 11:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I saw it. I am sorry for the misconception. I don't know if this is appropriate to ask but the media inside it meets the conditions to be on wikimedia commons. I want to know if I can improve anything there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucas256 (talk • contribs)
- There is nothing supporting the notability of the person. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- And notability is usually determined by wikipedias and not commons. We just host media for wikimedia projects. --Minoraxtalk 13:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Okay. There are a lot of photographs of non notable people on wikimedia commons. Is it okay for these photographs also do be there and only the gallery is marked for deletion or is everything suitable for deletion Lucas256talk 14:00 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- That will be up to the deleting admin to decide. --Minoraxtalk 14:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Can you please put me in touch with the deleting admin Lucas256talk 14:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 02:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Also to delete:
- File:587738afdhv.jpg
- File:Yvtfthijihgygy.jpg
- File:38586535548672728ucygugufugugu.jpg
- File:0017256371470554ubygyfyv617050063.jpg
I highly doubt that this is the uploaders own work. See https://www.google.at/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitWI7ADOl_1xPCvx3TL2UKgKt6TyU_1LGSU9g4FBYfxa6Jhx1K40Jd1l1X6kLv-AjHPoZfxqmafDZ92O8N3TVXP0rKmonUqvXJowjZVwl_1UjJXiFMf6hoMKWrwPRKoBkVYtpgK_1ARINX6TWQq53nEgnWaZUc57PJqUBn1gjcNl3osq6Ua9IwD0CYL-uRt53as6mSdoQB4MHSpKfOE1M4BLCkVlxYaGM-VXKrImFRDsbWGpKW0JOcr0PWxEgYh3aln8eORg5vBymsE1i4Pm5hJxScBVDoCCHL3V87ahGLhLperlYyaaspkGsPCF24BSi35GG7qw1WkV9Ns7PjHPiwCdMQGzqPypA&btnG=Bildersuche --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Low-res crop with no camera metadata, has been previously published at https://twitter.com/RaginCajunsMBB/status/1229442510688149504. images that have appeared elsewhere before being uploaded on Commons require COM:OTRS tickets. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, FB code in metadata. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". I think there is some liberty for Indonesian gov files but "own work" is not the correct license. E4024 (talk) 18:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a month as copyviolator. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". I think there is some liberty for Indonesian gov files but "own work" is not the correct license. E4024 (talk) 18:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a month as copyviolator. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". I think there is some liberty for Indonesian gov files but "own work" is not the correct license. E4024 (talk) 18:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a month as copyviolator. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". I think there is some liberty for Indonesian gov files but "own work" is not the correct license. (It looks more like a photo of a photo BTW.) E4024 (talk) 18:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a month as copyviolator. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". I think there is some liberty for Indonesian gov files but "own work" is not the correct license. E4024 (talk) 18:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a month as copyviolator. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". I think there is some liberty for Indonesian gov files but "own work" is not the correct license. E4024 (talk) 18:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a month as copyviolator. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Minnie Mouse
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted character, and COM:COSTUME. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mickey Mouse.
- File:Disney minnie mouse.jpg
- File:Ezequiel Matthews.jpg
- File:Raven Simone fist bumps with Minnie.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Minnie Mouse
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted character, and COM:COSTUME. See also above DRs.
- File:Cinderella Castle 45th Celebration (30047356045).jpg
- File:Minnie's Fly Girls Charter Airlines (6963829391).jpg
- File:New Ambassadors (15757846300).jpg
- File:Phil Guest - 10885441883.jpg
- File:Pinning New Ambassadors (15943182391).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DHN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://m.weibo.cn/status/4533608162793817 Larryasou (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
本檔案的著作權持有者https://m.weibo.cn/status/4533608162793817，在註明所有人姓名的前提下，允許任何人使用本檔案於任何用途。 包含再散佈、衍生作品、商業用途及其他用途。Sana1205 (talk) 03:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 08:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Is a logo that doesn't meet the criterion of non-copyright common property. This exact same logo was deleted in the past. -Kes47 [REPORT AN ERROR] 19:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:55, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
OTRS has been pending for over a month. No evidence photo has been released under a free license. — Tartan357 (Talk) 10:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation JannaFayeColeman (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Anything is possible but Google and Tineye gave me no hits. --MGA73 (talk) 18:06, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per MGA73. --Strakhov (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
That image is copyrighted and it will be deleted. RevereLocal (talk) 12:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination RevereLocal (talk) 12:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion by a new sockpuppet with the old rationale. Tm (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep nominator could at least provide a reason why it is a copyvio. --MGA73 (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete possible copyright violation 204.11.188.94 18:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment 204.11.188.94 was blocked globally in 30 of September for a month. Tm (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nom by sock of LTA. No new information since prior nom (also sock of same LTA). --Эlcobbola talk 15:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF but with transmission code; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + out of scope. --Hanooz 17:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + out of scope. --Hanooz 17:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP United States, there is no COM:FOP for 3D artworks in the US. Sculptor en:Charles McGee (painter) is still alive. Howhontanozaz (talk) 01:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. This file has no description of the shooting location. Therefore, COM:FOP cannot be applied. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete on the Flickr URL, two of the tags are Los Angeles and California. no freedom of panorama for non-architectural works in the United States; American FoP is limited to "buildings" only. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for sculptures in the US. Sculptor Scott Stearman is still alive and statue was unveiled in 1997. (source) Howhontanozaz (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of CC license at https://www.instagram.com/hicharliepowell/ C.Fred (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
maybe it violates copy rights Serine Ben Brahim (talk) 12:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: This is your user talk page, you probably wanted to nominate a different page. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Considering x, is this an own work as declared or not? There is camera EXIF? E4024 (talk) 02:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Image uploaded for the sole purpose of self promotion. It is only used on the users user page on Wikipedia Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Francisco C. Baltazar (Balagtas) Monument-Marker in Pagasa-Wawa (Poblacion), Orion, Bataan
[edit]https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1030605 (The statue made by world-renowned sculptor Julie Lluch was installed in Wawa in 2014.)
No freedom of pano in phils. The village pump ignored my concern of potential copyright violation against the morals of the creators of phil landamrks
- File:09917jfDaang Fields Boats Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 07.JPG
- File:09917jfDaang Fields Boats Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 08.JPG
- File:09917jfDaang Fields Boats Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 09.JPG
- File:09917jfDaang Fields Boats Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 10.JPG
- File:09917jfDaang Fields Boats Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 11.JPG
- File:09917jfDaang Fields Boats Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 12.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 01.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 02.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 03.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 04.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 05.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 06.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 07.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 08.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 09.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 10.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 11.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 12.JPG
- File:09929jfDaang Fields Halls Balagtas Poblacion Orion Bataanfvf 13.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime[edit]* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.[edit]
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:New Washington, Aklan
[edit]https://www.tripadvisor.com.ph/Attraction_Review-g10604034-d14774024-Reviews-Jaime_Cardinal_Sin_Monument-New_Washington_Aklan_Province_Panay_Island_Visayas.html#REVIEWS ------ "The monument was build in honor of the Jaime Cardinal Sin, a Catholic leader and national hero of the 1986 EDSA Revolution. The monument is standing in front of the New Washington Catholic Cathedral, Plaza ground of Poblacion New Washington..........The Statue has been rebuilt after being blown over by the big storm a few years back...."
No freedom of pano in the phils. Photos of this statue violate its creator's moral rights.
- File:Monument of the late Manila Archbishop Jaime L. Cardinal Sin.jpg
- File:Statue of Jaime Cardinal Sin in New Washington, Aklan.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dapitan
[edit]https://www.lakadpilipinas.com/2012/11/dapitan-city-rizal-landing-site-at.html?m=1
"The sculpture was conceptualized by Antonio Tuviera and was executed by Manuel Tolentino. The monument consists of five figures, including the three artillery escorts seemingly loading off from a small boat and the Spanish Captain on Rizal’s right side. It was opened to the public, 117 years after the actual event."
Actual event is 1892. 117 addition so 2009. No freedom of pano in phil.
- File:Dr. Jose P. Rizal Monument.jpg
- File:Punto del Dessembarco de Rizal.jpg
- File:Rizal in Dapitan.jpg
- File:Rizal Landing Site, Dapitan City.jpg
- File:The Rizal Landing Site in Dapitan City.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
https://m.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10151101246132075&type=3 - 2007 unveiled and unknown creator
No freedom of panorama in the phils
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 20.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 21.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 22.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 23.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 24.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 25.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 26.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 27.jpg
- File:1601Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 28.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime[edit]* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.[edit]
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Gross violation of no freedom of panorama in the phils. A recent work of art according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipina_Comfort_Women and its creator, Jonas Roces is still alive
- File:Manila Filipina Comfort Women Statue 01.jpg
- File:Manila Filipina Comfort Women Statue backside.jpg
- File:Memorare Comfort Women Statue and Historical Marker, Roxas Boulevard.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the phils. Artist is Jose Mendoza according to https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2001/12/17/143965/jose-mendoza-sculptor-all-seasons/amp/ - who seems to be alive during 70s and 80s
- File:Manila Philippines Water-buffalo-sculpture-at-Burnham-Green-01.jpg
- File:MetroManilajf8498 03.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf8498 07.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf8498 08.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
w:Arts in the Philippines#Non-folk Sculpture indicates this is from 2010. Unfortunate philippines has no freedom of panorama. Sculptor TOYM IMAO - https://img-cache.oppcdn.com/fixed/40167/assets/GFFbkqM85z9AmvW2.pdf
- File:CorazonAquinojf4067 02.JPG
- File:CorazonAquinojf4067 03.JPG
- File:CorazonAquinojf4067 04.JPG
- File:CorazonAquinojf4067 08.JPG
- File:CorazonAquinojf4067 09.JPG
- File:CorazonAquinojf4067 10.JPG
- File:FvfTSU0081 03.JPG
- File:FvfTSU0081 04.JPG
- File:FvfTSU0081 05.JPG
- File:FvfTSU0081 09.JPG
- File:FvfTSU0081 10.JPG
- File:FvfTSU0081 11.JPG
- File:FvfTSU0081 22.JPG
- File:TarlacCityjf4085 01.JPG
- File:TarlacCityjf4085 02.JPG
- File:TarlacCityjf4085 08.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- The shrine statue plaza are owned by the Local and National Government, hence outside the bounds of Copyright FOPs
- Speedy keep Keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 08:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
- Keep Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
- Delete all. None of the images show the sculpture incidentally. As I cannot find info who created this, perhaps this will fall PD in 2071 (50+1 years after creation). But since this is a non-architectural artistic work outside U.S. that is compliant with COM:URAA, undelete in 2106 (95+1 years after publication year), unless FOP is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: see also COM:Philippines#Commissioned works and COM:Philippines#Government works. The fact that the shrine is owned and managed by Tarlac City LGU doesn't deny the copyright of its sculptor (which I consider as anonymous for the while, pending information). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Do we accept previously published images without OTRS? No use, is she in scope? E4024 (talk) 01:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 14:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by a one-time-only visitor. File is old and used but COM:PCP prevails. E4024 (talk) 16:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Counterarguments: File size not particularly small for non-professional digital snapshots in 2008. No larger sizes nor earlier uploads found elsewhere in reverse image search. Image has been in use fairly prominently in multiple Wikimedia projects for close to 12 years without any previous complaint or suggestion of questionable sourcing. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep COM:PCP can be used against pretty much any self-uploaded image. At this point, the value of stability exceeds the value of deleting it on mere suspicion--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC).
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 14:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I want to use myself Bulbulahmed4 (talk) 19:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Use it; Commons files are free. --E4024 (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo. --ƏXPLICIT 14:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2001/12/17/143965/jose-mendoza-sculptor-all-seasons/amp/ - a creative artwork by Jose Mendoza who was alive in 70s and 80s. Unfortunately this country has no freedom of panorama and this landmark is a work of art. One photo shows a plaque with a golden carving thats certainly not from the government
- File:Relief map of the Philippines.jpg
- File:WTMP A-trio a1 1.JPG
- File:WTMP A-trio a1 4.JPG
- File:WTMP caladcarens A-1.JPG
- File:WTMP Flashbang a1.JPG
- File:WTMP Manila Bloggers Network A-1.JPG
- File:WTMP MARK ANGELO ROXAS DSC 0741.JPG
- File:WTMP Pangkat A-1-1.JPG
- File:WTMP Pangkat A-1-2.JPG
- File:WTMP Shutters 71.JPG
- File:WTMP Team Kampai DSC 0078.JPG
- File:WTMP Team Waka Waka A-1.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Unveiled in 2011 https://www.philstar.com/nation/2012/01/02/763746/maguindanaons-build-statue-sultan-kudarat/amp/ and it says "The city government built the newly inaugurated monument of Sultan Kudarat (1581–1671) with the help of a number of benefactors, including a local association of architects and engineers" but no statement of copyright transfer. No freedom of pano in the phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils. The artist is Toym Imao - http://www.pagnapagna.com/2017/02/walk-in-park-rizal-park-igorot-garden.html?m=1 Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Reviewing the object. Unfortunately, Delete: Toym Imao is indeed its creator: see [1]. As there is no freedom of panorama for architectural and artistic works in the Philippines that were created by still-living or recently-deceased artists and/or architects, this freely-licensed file (without sculptor's authorization) cannot be kept at Commons. While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps about possible introduction of freedom of panorama in the Philippines, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building, in a kingdom that has no total FOP), "deletion first is the right approach", even during active forums, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the artistic work's country of origin does not. File/s can be undeleted once FOP is introduced here, just like the cases of images of Armenian and Belgian architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in Armenia in 2013 and Belgium in 2016. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Regency_Hotel_and_Towers - 2005 completion of the bldg therefore photos of it are unfree Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. English Wikipedia article states it is a 2005 architecture, by T.I. Vasquez Architects and Planners, Inc.. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undeletion is possible, once FOP is introduced in the Philippines just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. Despite this, per COM:PCP (see this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building) deletion first is the right way, in respect of the architects' and/or sculptors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP United States, there is no COM:FOP for sculptures in the US. Subject sculpture was created by en:Rigo 23, who is still alive, and was unveiled in 2005 (source). Howhontanozaz (talk) 04:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in phils. https://nolisoli.ph/63279/7-important-mosques-in-the-philippines/ - Designed by architect Angel Nakpil, the Blue Mosque’s clean lines and courtyard take cues from the architecture of Cordoba in Spain. The structure’s touches of blue include the tip of its minaret, the arches of the main prayer hall, as well as the interior and exterior of its dome. Googling shows me that angel nakpil died in 1980. https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_Nakpil Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sad to say, Delete until freedom of panorama is finally introduced in our country. Still no FOP for majority of architectural and artistic (sculptures etc.) works in the Philippines, even after this two-month long discussion of Sept.–Nov.. While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building, in a kingdom that has no total FOP), "deletion first is the right approach", even during active forums, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the work's country of origin (the Philippines for this case) does not. File/s can be undeleted once FOP exists or is introduced here—perhaps via COM:UNDEL or a COM:Village pump/COM:Administrators' noticeboard motion or announcement just like the cases of images of Armenian and Belgian architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in Armenia in 2013 and Belgium in 2016. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 1957. No Permission from the sculptors and architects І. Михайленко, В. Новиков, Д. Чорновол. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 14:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils
https://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WMAY68_Confucius__Manila_Philippines - (This statue, sponsored by the Anvil Business Club of Manila, specifically honors Confucius in his role as a teacher, and thereby is erected in honor of all teachers. It was placed in 2009 in the Chinese Garden section of the large Rizal Park in downtown Manila.)
- File:9787Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 50.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 01.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 03.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 04.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 05.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 06.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 07.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 08.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 09.jpg
- File:9837Chinese Garden Wisdom Walk 10.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tandang Sora Shrine
[edit]No freedom of pano in the phils. The artist of the whole shrine is the still alive Toym Imao - https://www.theurbanroamer.com/a-shrine-for-the-revolutions-grand-old-lady/
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 03.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 04.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 05.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 06.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 07.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 08.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 10.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 11.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 12.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 13.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 14.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 15.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 16.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 17.jpg
- File:Tandang Sora Shrine 18.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues in Davao City
[edit]No freedom of pano in the phils:
- the Commemorative Monumeny of davao city --- http://davaocitybybattad.blogspot.com/2012/07/commemorative-monument-of-peace-and.html?m=1 -- 1998, by Davaoenyo artist Ray Mudjahid "Kublai" Millan
- the bonifacio monument --- http://davaocitybybattad.blogspot.com/2012/08/andres-bonifacio-rotunda.html?m=1 -- the rotonda is mentioned as from 1961 and it can be assume that the sculptor might be alive during 70s and at least 80s.
- nothing found on google for the rizal monument of davao. But it looks recent
- File:Phils Davao City The Commemorative Monument of Peace & Liberty.JPG
- File:Rizal Monument at Rizal Park, Davao City.jpg
- File:Statue of Andrés Bonifacio, Davao.jpg
- File:The Commemorative Monument of Peace and Unity Monument.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
https://www.adamson.edu.ph/v1/?page=view-news&newsid=306 - 2007 by Jun Vicaldo sculptor. No freedom of panorama in the phils.
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 37.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 38.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 39.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 40.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 41.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 42.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 43.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 44.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 45.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 46.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 47.jpg
- File:693Adamson University Museum Manila 48.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 01.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 02.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 03.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 04.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 05.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 06.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 07.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 08.jpg
- File:742Adamson University Museum Manila 09.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely
- I am former Vincentian Seminarian and I asked permission from Fr. Constancio Gan whom I healed and my classmate Adamson President Gregorio Lapus Banaga, Jr. and even now the New President Marcelo Manimtim who is my senior school seminarian mate;Judgefloro (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Malacañang Palace
[edit]No freedom of pano in the phils. Even in your wiki entry it says it underwent extensive renovations, and under the Marcos admin "The old Palace was gutted almost entirely, not only to meet the needs of the Presidential Family, but also because the buildings had been weakened by patch up renovations over a century that had resulted in unstable floors and leaking roofs. The building is now made of poured concrete, concrete slabs, steel girders and trusses, all concealed under elegant hardwood floors, panels and ceilings. It is fully bullet-proofed, cooled by central air-conditioning with filters, and has an independent power supply. Architect Jorge Ramos oversaw the reconstruction, which was closely supervised by Mrs. Marcos. The refurbished Palace was inaugurated on May 1, 1979–the Marcos' silver wedding anniversary."
It indicates it is not the same bldg as the spanish or american era which was mainly made of wood. Meaning the current bldg is from 1979. I couldnt found a source for the death date of Jorge Ramos.
To filipino wikipedians who were critical of my statements, no ad hominem and poisoning the well statements pls to defend your claims
- File:Malacañang Palace (Cropped).jpg
- File:Malacañang Palace as seen from Saint Jude Catholic School.jpg
- File:Malacañang Palace.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ok Mrcl lxmna I will not launch my tirades against you. I'm relatively exhausted.
For this symbol of the our government, I'd sayI lately passed by one Commons forum involving this palace though: Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2014/02#Category:Malacañang Palace, in which there was no conclusion. Paging those involved there for the inputs: @Stefan4, Gestumblindi, JohnnyWiki, and Prosfilaes: . I'd add photos of various incarnations of this palace for comparison purposes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Keep as I can argue that this is a reconstruction done with faithfulness to the architecture of the 40s, despite with new materials and structure.
- for comparison purposes
-
1910 -
1940 -
today
-
the logo
- Keep I mean, really? Are renovations even copyrightable? Besides, I'm sure the government is not stupid enough to not sign a contract transferring whatever copyright Jorge Ramos had to them. P.S. for future reference, Jorge Ramos died in November 2015. (source) -Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended content by Mrcl lxmna
|
|---|
|
To counter potential use of twisted government work rationale, even the government is not obliged to force the creators to waive their moral rights to them. And assume the government owns this bldg even the moral rights, in spite of saying "no copyright shall subsist......", a provision on the RA8293 limits everyone's ability to use government works: "CHAPTER VIII. LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT SEC. 184. Limitations on Copyright. - 184.1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter V, the following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: .... (h) The use made of a work by or under the direction or control of the Government, by the National Library or by educational, scientific or professional institutions where such use is in the public interest and is compatible with fair use; ...." Wikimedia commons passes public interest but it doesnt accept fair use as jeff g one of your moderators said at village pump before. Maybe the logo presented by jwilz also violates this provision. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 01:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
- Delete sadly. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. It appears the current palace architecture is substantially different from the 1940s-era building, as seen in the comparison photos I put here. Without tangible evidence of a formal copyright-transfer contract between Jorge Ramos and the government, it is safe (per COM:PCP) to assume that the architect's heirs still hold the copyright, per provisions under R.A.8293. Jorge Ramos died in 2015. Undeletion is possible, once FOP is introduced in the Philippines just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. A plea to the admins: please move the most heavily used file here to enwiki and add warning tag w:Template:FoP-USonly with indication that this very important building in our country fails COM:FOP Philippines as a recent architecture by Architect Jorge Ramos who died in 2015. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, It's a government owned building that is sanctioned, owned, and maintained by the current Philippine Republic how is this "renovation" even copyrightable? PyroFloe (talk) 16:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- @PyroFloe: if renovations were substantial, which included new architectural elements, then the renovated building was copyrightable. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Zeitz Museum: Clindberg mentioned that the older structure (the silos) may be in public domain, but the newer additions are copyrighted by their designer, the architect w:Thomas Heathereock. For the case of Malacañan, I see few similarities of the 1979 architecture by architect Jorge Ramos and the building as seen in the 1940s, in one of the photos of this building. As much as I would want to poll "keep", but this is a tricky situation considering an FOP-reliant subject which isn't "a work by a government employee". Per COM:CRT/Philippines#Government works: "the government may acquire copyright in a work, which will continue to last for the normal duration." Under Section 176.3, "Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest or otherwise; nor shall publication or republication by the government in a public document of any work in which copyright is subsisting be taken to cause any abridgment or annulment of the copyright or to authorize any use or appropriation of such work without the consent of the copyright owner." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Final input: Delete all and restore if FOP becomes part of the copyright law here. I've already chosen the best image (File:Malacañang Palace (Cropped).jpg) and uploaded locally on enwiki as w:File:Malacañang Palace (local img).jpg (cannot use the same name as I seem to have no right to upload files with same name on other Wiki projects). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: , who will nominate the undeletion of all these No FOP Philippine images once FOP does come here in the Philippines? There are a lot of images nominated by Mrcl lxmna that you commented on, are you sure that we can keep track of all these photos especially the sheer size of these nominations? PyroFloe (talk) 03:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- @PyroFloe: it's simple. The admins will be the one who will restore, perhaps not needing an undeletion request at COM:UNDEL, provided that the news of the introduction of FOP is posted at COM:Village pump. It's essentially the same situation as that of Belgian cases (which totalled more than 700, images totalled more than 1000), and similar to the Armenian public art and Russian buildings. That's why a category like Category:Philippine FOP cases/undeleted exists. Once FOP has arrived here. But, take note that it will become final once the implementing rules and regulations refining the FOP provision have been made, as the FOP provision in the copyright law amendment bill is too general (modelled after section 65(2) of the Australian FOP). But right now, as per IPOPHL-BCRR's statement applies, "freedom of panorama is not provided in the copyright law" and regular rules apply. This means the need to obtain license from the heirs of architects and sculptors. Otherwise, let's wait until FOP is fully introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- All case pages resulting to deletion have been sorted at Category:Philippine FOP cases/deleted. I also thoroughly searched for uncategorized ones (Philippine FOP) last September/October 2020 and categorized them accordingly. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Isulan, Sultan Kudarat
[edit]https://www.mindanews.com/c3-news/2006/11/sultan-kudarats-new-capitol-inaugurated/ (completed 2006)
No freedom of panorama in phil.
- File:Capitol-single.jpg
- File:Provincial Capitol, Sultan Kudarat Province, Philippines.JPG
- File:Sultan Kudarat Capitol Panoramic.jpg
- File:Sultan Kudarat Capitol.jpg
- File:WV banner Sultan Kudarat provincial capitol.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
extended input
|
|---|
|
Counterinh howhantanozas's government work rationale, even the government is not obliged to force the creators to waive their moral rights to them. And assume the government owns this bldg even the moral rights, in spite of saying "no copyright shall subsist......", a provision on the RA8293 limits everyone's ability to use government works: "CHAPTER VIII. LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT SEC. 184. Limitations on Copyright. - 184.1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter V, the following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: .... (h) The use made of a work by or under the direction or control of the Government, by the National Library or by educational, scientific or professional institutions where such use is in the public interest and is compatible with fair use; ...." Wikimedia commons passes public interest but it doesnt accept fair use as jeff g one of your moderators said at village pump before. So howhantanazos' government works rationale is invalid. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 01:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
- Delete buildings and other FOP-reliant objects are mostly commissioned works, and per Sec. 178.4 of the copyright law (COM:Philippines#Commissioned works), "the person who so commissioned the work shall have ownership of the work, but the copyright thereto shall remain with the creator, unless there is a written stipulation to the contrary." This means, the Provincial Government of Sultan Kudarat owns the building physically, but copyright still remains with the architect. A good basis is that there are no other building by different architectural entity anywhere in the country with an architectural design 100% identical to the provincial capitol. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused file. Formulae with no explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for monuments. -- 109.238.80.87 10:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio from newspaper website Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The original image is located here: [2]. Delete --Kuebi (talk) 12:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure that this new logo fits PD-textlogo. The letters СБЕР БАНК satisfies, but the symbol doesn't (due to color transitions). Brateevsky {talk} 14:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please see: File:Sberbank Logo 2020.svg. --sasha (krassotkin) 22:23, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
doubious "own" work, exif Oesterreicher12 (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete + dubious scope. --E4024 (talk) 20:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 22:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Evelio Javier
[edit]Various sculptures, murals and artistic monuments. No freedom of panorama in the phils.
- File:Beloy in Barangay EBJ.jpg
- File:Evelio Javier and Ninoy Aquino Monument - January 2019.jpg
- File:Name sign Evelio Javier Freedom Park San Jose Antique Plaza.jpg
- File:Part of memorial to Evelio Javier in San Jose Antique.jpg
- File:Plaque t of memorial to Evelio Javier in San Jose Antique.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Evelio Javier and Ninoy Aquino Monument - January 2019.jpg There is no basis for deleting this since this is a PUBLIC STATUE made by the Philippine Government. Why is Mrcl lxmna nominating this for deletion when it has no basis for the said deletion? RoyKabanlit (talk) 15:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agree with User:RoyKabanlit, Keep File:Evelio Javier and Ninoy Aquino Monument - January 2019.jpg as per former Manila Mayor en:Lito Atienza in this article, "These are government property built with taxpayers’ money." Template:PD-PhilippinesGov applies here. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as all of these are owned and managed by the government as per both RoyKabanlit and Howhontanozaz. I might want to inquire How about the copyright status of the other subjects aside from Evelio Javier and Ninoy Aquino Monument - January 2019.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Howhontanozaz Thanks for the support. RoyKabanlit (talk) 00:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- JWilz12345 Thanks also. As for the other Pictures, I think File:Name sign Evelio Javier Freedom Park San Jose Antique Plaza.jpg is also okay since it is on a Public Park, the en:San Jose de Buenavista#Tourism in Antique is located in front of the Provincial Capitol Building. I can't say for sure about the other Statues though if they are on Public Property (i.e. Parks, Roundabouts, etc.). RoyKabanlit (talk) 00:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Howhontanozaz Thanks for the support. RoyKabanlit (talk) 00:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agree with User:RoyKabanlit,
Take note @RoyKabanlit: , the copyright of a sculpture or any other artwork is usually the sculptor or his/her heirs, unless there's an official contract between the sculptor / their heirs and the government (e.g. Provincial Government of Antique) transferring their moral rights (to the government). No freedom of panorama is an issue several Filipino Wikipedians are now dealing with, in light of recent DR's targetted at various Philippine buildings and sculptures thought to not fall under the exemptions of Commons:FOP Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have already emailed the Municipality of San Jose de Buenavista, Antique. It's the waiting game now. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 02:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Slashing my keep input. @Howhontanozaz and RoyKabanlit: there's a rule in commissioned works (seen at COM:Philippines#Commissioned works). Accordingly, the copyright remains with the copyright holder (usually the artist who created or designed it), and the person or entity who commissioned the work (in this case the municipality) only holds physical possession of the work, unless there's a "written stipulation on the contrary". Such stipulation should be sent to Commons via COM:OTRS. Without this stipulation between the local government and the artist, copyright is assumed to be held by the sculptor (or if he is already deceased, their heirs). So unfortunately, much of the images may need to go per COM:PCP, until FOP is now finally introduced here soon (see the "Recent developments" subsection at COM:FOP Philippines). While File:Name sign Evelio Javier Freedom Park San Jose Antique Plaza.jpg is aimed towards the name sign, the presence of what I assume to be a 2D art (a mural?) to the left undermines de minimis claim. Cropping to remove it may do, but may render the image useless. File:Plaque t of memorial to Evelio Javier in San Jose Antique.jpg shows a form of literary work ("The Impossible Dream"), which seems to be a musical work. Search on Google for the lyrics shows the exact wording (with the Google claiming the artist to be Andy Williams), and further searches confirm this is w:The Impossible Dream (The Quest), which is still copyrighted as its lyricist, w:Joe Darion, died in 2001. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Eastwood City
[edit]Work of art unveiled in 2005. No freedom of pano in the phils.
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- You could probably argue this for File:Eastwood City Walk of Fame.jpg (as it has a clearly distinguishable logo), but for File:Eastwood City Walk of Fame 2.jpg, it's a sidewalk. The logo is undistinguishable, and I think a star counts as a simple shape that can be said not to be protected by copyright law. I'm for having these cleaned up but some discretion has to be done in mass nominating these. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
The wiki entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastwood_City_Walk_of_Fame indicates it as "The Walk of Fame is a project of the German Moreno Walk of Fame Foundation (formerly the Walk of Fame Gallery and Museum), a non-profit organization founded by the late German Moreno, which the expense is from his own pocket.[1] Entrepreneur Alice Eduardo joined him as co-owner in 2013." Also "In February 2016, it was announced that Moreno's son, Federico will become Walk of Fame's president and general manager." Nothing says about who the designers ofbthese stars are. Simple shape? No, it is grouped under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Public_art_in_Metro_Manila so still a form of artwork.
Also pls see this part of RA 8293
- "CHAPTER II.
ORIGINAL WORKS
SEC. 172. Literary and Artistic Works. - 172.1 Literary and artistic works, hereinafter referred to as "works", are original intellectual creations in the literary and artistic domain protected from the moment of their creation and shall include in particular:
(g) Works of drawing, painting, architecture, sculpture, ENGRAVING, lithography or other works of art; models or designs for works of art;
172.2. Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, IRRESPECTIVE OF THEIR MODE OR FORM OF EXPRESSION, as well as of THEIR CONTENT, quality and PURPOSE. (Sec. 2, P.D. No. 49a) Mrcl lxmna (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
과거 사진입니다. 211.253.60.34 00:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a reason to delete files, because Commons hosts old and outdated photos to show history. Deleted as copyright violation. There's no freedom of panorama in South Korea and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I believe previously deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sultan Saidamen Pangarungan.jpg. Likely, {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} but without source information cannot be confirmed. Appears in modified form at https://ncmf.gov.ph/secretarys-corner/ --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 00:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
My own work. Not necessary. Caskination (talk) 01:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
My own work. Not necessary. Caskination (talk) 01:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
My own work. Not necessary. Caskination (talk) 01:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
My own work. Not necessary. Caskination (talk) 01:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, © Jeppesen 2017. All rights reserved. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Goofy
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character, and COM:COSTUME. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mickey Mouse.
- File:Christmas Goofy.jpg
- File:Dingo - 20150804 16h52 (10978).jpg
- File:Goofy and Minnie Shoulder Sling.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic wprks" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic wprks" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic wprks" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic wprks" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
copyright Bar (talk to me) 02:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, archive.org confirms was at url at house.gov, so PD-US-Gov license would seem correct. What do you see as a "copyright" problem? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, seems like work of US government, but – I did not find the photo at source site. License was never reviewed and that way I cannot confirm, that the photo is work of US government. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
copyright Bar (talk to me) 02:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep archive org confirms house.gov source; what do you think is a "copyright" problem? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, seems like work of US government, but – I did not find the photo at source site. License was never reviewed and that way I cannot confirm, that the photo is work of US government. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I created this file and its not in use Bar (talk to me) 14:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. Obvious educational use. Brianjd (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Emha (talk) 16:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
copyright Bar (talk to me) 02:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The image is not in the indicated source. --E4024 (talk) 14:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: seems like work of US government, but – I did not find the photo at source site. License was never reviewed and that way I cannot confirm, that the photo is work of US government. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploader Zgalehouse does not match photographer Renée Lopez, so the license as "own work" is likely invalid. Conifer (talk) 03:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 03:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 03:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment User uploaded a number of files to Commons over a period of 11 months; description of the uploader as "a one-time visitor" seems inaccurate. Image currently in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- That must be a copy-paste mistake; has not much to do with the contents. Being in use has less to do with the DR. I am speaking about COM:PCP. Thanks for the note. --E4024 (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:Xanthi Muslim elders - Eastern Macedonia & Thrace.JPG (600×411) due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep if there is a correct license, not as "own work". E4024 (talk) 03:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:Caucasus Greek community leaders, circa 1900.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Not an "own work". Please provide a source for licensing and also checking the content information. (The watermark does not help much.) E4024 (talk) 03:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:Caucasus Greek family from Magaracik, circa 1900.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation in https://www.sbt.com.br/jornalismo/poder-em-foco João Justiceiro (talk) 04:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
DeletionFooter|DELETED|this is textlogo and ineligible for copyright. I'll delete it as out of project scope. Poder em Foco is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: See pt:Poder_em_Foco (Why did you search in the Spanish Wikipedia and not in the Portuguese Wikipedia is a true mystery.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept, @Tuvalkin: That's simple: I do not make difference between these languages. I restored the image and will categorize it. Taivo (talk) 07:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The text in this photo (related to Falun Gong) is unlikely "own work". 沈澄心✉ 05:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
生命重于泰山
疫情就是命令
防空就是责任
--习近平
Note that this image was not posted by Xi Jinping's Wikimedia Commons account
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_مبین.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![154 File:Latrice Butts "Actress".jpg](#File:Latrice_Butts_"Actress".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![206 File:The Public Viewing David’s "Coronation" at the Louvre MET 2012.156 profile.jpg](#File:The_Public_Viewing_David’s_"Coronation"_at_the_Louvre_MET_2012.156_profile.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![260 File:"მოსკოვსკიე ნოვოსტი", 2006, საქართველოში არასდროს არ იქნება პუტინის ხელისუფლება.jpg](#File:"მოსკოვსკიე_ნოვოსტი",_2006,_საქართველოში_არასდროს_არ_იქნება_პუტინის_ხელისუფლება.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D9%85%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%86.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D9%85%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%86.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_مبین.jpg){kind=link}
_مبین.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![01:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/24#c-E4024-2020-09-24T01:30:00.000Z-File:Latrice_Butts_"Actress".jpg){kind=link}
![14:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/24#c-Explicit-2021-02-09T14:07:00.000Z-File:Latrice_Butts_"Actress".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
济、科学防治、精准施
策，我们就一定能打赢
疫情防控阻击战。
--习近平
about 17 words, 36 characters, not posted by Xi Jinping
_IMG_1852.JPG)
- My one was an home made photo, I added it in the description --Moxmarco (talk) 08:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The phrase in the image "Falun Gong Stamp on the Reverse of a One Yuan Banknote.jpg" is a rhyming slogan made up of about 16 words and 28 Chinese characters that reads
"中共邪党彻底完
谁想挽救都枉然
退党大潮不可挡
抛弃恶党得平安"
approximately translated as
"the CCP evil party is totally finished (rhyme)
whoever seeks to save it does so in vain (rhyme)
the movement to leave the party is unstoppable
abandon the evil party and get peace (rhyme)" Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The phrase in the image "Falun Gong Stamp on the Reverse of a One Yuan Banknote.jpg" is a rhyming slogan made up of about 16 words and 28 Chinese characters that reads
@沈澄心: Let me know if there are any further developments here. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Geographyinitiative: Short text is not definitely uncopyrightable. For example, a 五绝, which is made up of only 20 Han characters, is obviously a literary work. On the other hand, long text is not definitely copyrighted. According to the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China, news on current affairs (时事新闻) is uncopyrightable (see s:zh:Wikisource:版權討論#8月). But I'm not sure whether the phrase in the image "Falun Gong Stamp on the Reverse of a One Yuan Banknote.jpg" is a literature work or not. Further discussion is needed. --沈澄心✉ 13:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @沈澄心: Let me know about further developments. I can't wait to see how this turns out. Thanks! --Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Wcam: What's your opinion? --沈澄心✉ 13:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The image is a derivative work of a non-free image zh:File:Bh2.JPG, and the text I believe is copyrightable. In addition, according to this article, for a long time in China illegal works were not subject to copyright protection but is no longer the case now. --Wcam (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Some responses:
Response to claim 1: This image is not a derived work from the image zh:File:Bh2.JPG.
Response to claim 2: The text is not copyrightable- compare to the text on the other stamps and in the other images provided as examples here.
Response to claim 3: Are all illegal works are subject to copyright protection? As I'm reading, the protection is only extended to illegal works depending on their character (性质). Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC) - Similar concept [3] --Geographyinitiative (talk) 17:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Geographyinitiative: Fyi, Please note that COM:FOP US is for buildings only, hence I separately nominated your this example for deletion. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Some responses:
- The image is a derivative work of a non-free image zh:File:Bh2.JPG, and the text I believe is copyrightable. In addition, according to this article, for a long time in China illegal works were not subject to copyright protection but is no longer the case now. --Wcam (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Geographyinitiative: Short text is not definitely uncopyrightable. For example, a 五绝, which is made up of only 20 Han characters, is obviously a literary work. On the other hand, long text is not definitely copyrighted. According to the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China, news on current affairs (时事新闻) is uncopyrightable (see s:zh:Wikisource:版權討論#8月). But I'm not sure whether the phrase in the image "Falun Gong Stamp on the Reverse of a One Yuan Banknote.jpg" is a literature work or not. Further discussion is needed. --沈澄心✉ 13:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uyghur_boycott_20Sept2020.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, so somebody must be specialist of Chinese poetry and I volunteer to be bold. All the images, which show text, are prose. The nominated image is poetry (it has rhyme, the others have not). Threshold of originality for poetry is lower then for prose. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
According to me it is really hard to call it "simple shapes and text only". We have a pretty complicated typeface, gradient colors, unique font. Masur (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, "of the" with borders around it is not simple. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo displays one of menus from a Dragon Quest game. Furthermore, the capture has a background: looks creative, maybe either some landscape, an aerial view of a world, or something like that. George Ho (talk) 06:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I think the background pattern is one of De minimis--Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept, I tend to agree with Benzoyl. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This photo shows a bar using decorations of Luida's Bar from Dragon Quest franchise. The other photo showing the same bar was deleted but showed a different angle. I wasn't sure whether de minimis applies to this photo. It has "Luida's Bar" signs, and it has DQ icons all over glass walls. Well, there are no kegs in the photo. I'm still not sure whether it is below or above the line of COM:FOP Japan. George Ho (talk) 06:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The logos are all very small, and if you zoom on them they become very low-resolution. If the consensus is still that it is above the line, please let me know and I will blur the logos. Thanks :-) Syced (talk) 07:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is difficult decision, but I delete it, partly because Nat deleted the other photo. If you zoom on the logos, then they are enough sharp and big, also Luida's bar logo is enough big. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo contains a photo within the photo, so I created a cropped version of the photo. Meanwhile, I think the (original) photo should be deleted. There are other photos of the real-life couple, Nick Offerman and Megan Mullally, used in the project. George Ho (talk) 07:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- You're right; that's clearly a DW. Delete per nom and thanks for the crop. --E4024 (talk) 02:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by LexICon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photographer & Copyright = Johannes Zinner; so for clearly not: "own work of: SPÖ Presse und Kommunikation".
Converted to regular DR to allow for the required discussion, as image is still under the claimed license on flickr. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Same with crop: File:Bernhard Heher.jpg.
- Yes, but the SPÖ give there photographs under a CC License since few years -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 10:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Zinner works in order of SPÖ ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 10:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Zinner works for the Social Democratic Party of Austria and they publish everything under a free license. No reason for deletion. --Ailura (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- If so, at least the Author file should be adjusted. --LexICon (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Zinner works for the Social Democratic Party of Austria and they publish everything under a free license. No reason for deletion. --Ailura (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Zinner works in order of SPÖ ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 10:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP Japan, freedom of panorama only extends to buildings and does not cover the graphics in this banner. ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, difficult choice. I consulted COM:TOO Japan and decided, that the banner is copyrightable. Although it is made only from simple geometrical figures (circles), there are a lot of circles here and they create artistic illusion. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not a painting. What is it exactly ? Sammyday (talk) 07:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It's part of the image set The Public Viewing David’s "Coronation" at the Louvre here; this particular image is a profile drawing of the frame of the painting, so should have been uploaded under a different name if at all - for I suppose that it's not freely licensed (unlike the painting itself, which is in the public domain), as the description there explicitly says "Due to rights restrictions, this image cannot be enlarged, viewed at full screen, or downloaded". I'm not deleting it right now because I'd like to give Pharos a heads-up hereby; Pharos, maybe your tools for uploading GLAM image sets need some improvement for cases such as this one. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
_and_Her_Son,_Eug%C3%A8ne_(1800%E2%80%931859)_MET_53.61.4_profile.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, will be undeleted in 2043. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Request to delete as creator to be able to use Croptool to create a better version 131.176.243.9 08:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Request withdrawn. I found a better version on Internet Archive and uploaded it instead of using again Croptool. Sorry for the useless request. Hektor (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept, new version is uploaded. Taivo (talk) 12:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no evidence of permission Krd 08:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No CCE entry found for the McCracken illustrations, but I did find an earlier renewal for a 1929 edition ( R194678.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Added not renewed, however this is not an area I've seen discussed before. If a renewal of one edition implies that all editions are renewed, then that ought to be clarified in the 'not renewed' template and the relevant parts of US copyright law spelt out in the guidelines somewhere. It's not obvious to me that this would be true in copyright law, further it could potentially make checking for renewals much harder in order to double check the history of all editions without their associated identities (e.g. foreign language editions might be separate cases, and still ought to be checked). --Fæ (talk) 10:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think that has any bearing on this particular edition. The renewal entry says the copyright (registered 1929, renewed 1957) applies only to the introduction by Elizabeth Lodor Merchant and illustrations by Edwin J. Prittie, not the text by Dinah Craik. If there's no renewal for the illustrations of this edition (and I don't see any in 1957 or 1958 under either Craik, Dinah, or McCracken, James), then it should be okay. I think it's safe to assume the text is unambiguously public domain since Craik died in 1887. In fact, it was probably already public domain by the time either the 1929 or 1930 editions were published. clpo13(talk) 00:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- That was my analysis, you checked the 'Artwork' renewals as well? Given that it would be the illustrations that are the concern not the actual text.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't see anything there either. I looked for both the illustrator and publisher names. clpo13(talk) 16:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The renewal seems to be of a different edition, of which there can be many, especially of a PD work.--Prosfilaes (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Ho caricato per sbaglio questa foto senza eliminare il nome in alto a sinistra. Expepper (talk) 09:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for monuments. -- 109.238.80.87 10:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for monuments. -- 109.238.80.87 10:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for monuments. -- 109.238.80.87 10:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for monuments. -- 109.238.80.87 10:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for monuments. -- 109.238.80.87 10:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Spam. not in use. 93.92.201.150 11:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: No evidence for the "spam" claim, and no other valid deletion rationale provided. Images do not have to be in use to remain on Commons. — Tartan357 (Talk) 11:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, not spam and in project scope. Deleted as copyright violation: author and copyright holder Svetlana Yermakova. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, COM:DW of copyrighted artwork, not 3D. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - this is a sign which is permanently installed on public display, as per Commons:Freedom of panorama Cnbrb (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Not only that its taken from a free image. See https://www.freeimages.com/photo/old-bell-1226072 and https://www.freeimages.com/license. Yet another piece otf time wasting deletionsism run riot. If your going to be a deletionist at least do your homework. ... Broichmore (talk) 12:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Cnbrb: Does not benefit from Freedom of Panorama as the painting is a 2D rather than a 3D work. @Broichmore: The photograph may be free but the painting is still copyright and the so-called "free image" is a breach of copyright of the artist who painted the sign. I was an admin here for over five years, so perhaps you could refrain from assuming that I don't know what I'm talking about. The vast majority of photos of pub signs we host here are such violations, and the only reason we still have them is that nobody has yet nominated them for deletion. Perhaps I'll do that in the light of such a display of ignorance of copyright and licensing policy here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Noted (grudgingly) re. the 2D/3D distinction. I'm going to assume that the rest of that was directed at Broichmore and not me. Cnbrb (talk) 14:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I have also had a look at the licensing conditions on the source page, since it's been added. However, their licence is incompatible with any of the licences we allow here, because it limits use and is therefore (in Creative Commons terms) an "NC" licence, which we do not accept, and never have. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this image is the uploaders own work Hangman'sDeath (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work, copyrighted map Stolbovsky (talk) 12:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Russia for maps. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Sensitive information: an ID is shown. 93.92.201.150 12:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept, that's false. No sensitive information here. Not even given name or surname. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
All excapt one uploads by this users are class F1 or F10. I highly doubt that this image is really the uploaders own work Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, no-no, this is not own work. I'll delete also file:Invinoveritas123.jpg as copyvio and now all the user's contributions are deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 12:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:شیخ سیدنا عماالدین شاہ حماد اسدی الہاشمی.jpg due to same reason. These are the user's last remaining uploads. Taivo (talk) 13:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 12:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Staatsarchiv Freiburg Eingang.jpg Juergenlang63 (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept, it seems to me, that you do not want to delete your userpage, but the file. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to be uploader's own work; obvious artifacts present that suggests the image was captured from another screen. Chenzw Talk 14:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Staatsarchiv Freiburg Eingang.jpg Juergenlang63 (talk) 14:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
A creative artwork by Jose Mendoza but unfortunately this country has no freedom of panorama. My basis for the person behind this artistic sculpture:: https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2001/12/17/143965/jose-mendoza-sculptor-all-seasons/amp/ Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, file is a derivative work cropped from a photo deleted due to dubious non-FoP reasons. See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Nonoyborbun Hariboneagle927 (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Removing FoP category as per Hariboneagle927's input. Delete as per the deletion nomination link given. The mother file deleted before is a probable copyvio. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Removing FoP category as per Hariboneagle927's input.
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Häuserpartie im Stühlinger, Freiburg i. Br..jpg Juergenlang63 (talk) 14:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Bild kann nicht sinnvoll verwendet werden Juergenlang63 (talk) 08:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; I don't quite get the reasoning "image cannot be used in a meaningful way" - why?. --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Das Bild nicht mehr benötigt. Juergenlang63 (talk) 14:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Bild wurde durch ein anderes (besseres) ausgetauscht Juergenlang63 (talk) 08:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I could not find the better version. --Amada44 talk to me 19:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Inzwischen wurde ein anderes Foto verwendet! Juergenlang63 (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If there's another photo of a similar view of this building, it is not in any of the categories listed on the page, and this photo is still usable, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Incorrectly uploaded Sib1991 (talk) 14:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: According to the user page, the picture come from the serial Zorro. Thus, not a personnal work and not in public domain. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I personally know the subject of the photo Keith McCleary & personally took the photo. You can contact him directly to confirm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bludiamonds (talk • contribs) 15:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:OTRS Timtrent (talk) 08:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
doubious "own" work Oesterreicher12 (talk) 15:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
doubious "own" work, no/bad exif, lokks like a screenshot Oesterreicher12 (talk) 15:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
obviously not truely own work considering that it is from 1947 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploader requests deletion >7 days from upload. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete foto ini disalah gunakan oleh pihak yang tidak bertanggung jawab — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karaeng Matoa (talk • contribs) 11:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader, Achrefgh23 (talk · contribs). I am interpreting that as a request for deletion, and have started this DR as the file is >7 days old. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: poor image without location, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in phil. - https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2002/12/02/186314/general-gregorio-del-pilar-philippine-painting-sculpture/ (The same image and narrative are also committed to sculpture. The likeness of Gregorio Del Pilar was executed in 2000 into an equestrian statue by history sculptor Apolinario Paraiso Bulaong. ........ Aside from this equestrian statue and numerous bust portraits of Del Pilar, Bulaong also executed in 2001 a relief sculpture depicting the battle at Tirad Pass. The sculptural mural is installed at the plaza of Bulacan, Bulacan, where Del Pilar came from.) Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The white plaque just underneath the sculpture indicates that it was the municipal government of w:Bulakan, Bulacan that commissioned the creation of the the statue (see this photo). This means that the whole monument including the statue is considered as a work of the government and not of Bulaong for the purposes of copyright (Bulaong did not create the statue out of his own volition and it is a work-for-hire). Thus, the monument enjoys freedom of copyright per the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines. The media file is thus tagged {{WorkDepicted-PD-PhilippinesGov}} accordingly. Unless there is evidence presented that Bulaong retained copyright of his creation, the presumption is that this whole monument is government work. —seav (talk) 23:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I beg to disagree to seav. Government works are indeed "free" the so called no copyright shall subsists as written on the intellectual propertt code of the philippines. But theres a red notice at the law saying: "However, prior approval of the government agency or office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties. No prior approval or conditions shall be required for the use of any purpose of statutes, rules and regulations, and speeches, lectures, sermons, addresses, and dissertations, pronounced, read or rendered in courts of justice, before administrative agencies, in deliberative assemblies and in meetings of public character. (Sec. 9, first par., P.D. No. 49)." Firstly did the person who took this photo asked permission from the management? Secondly, do seav has proof that bulaong indeed made this work for hire? Pls read this part: "176.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest or otherwise....." ---- MRCEL LXMNA
- Delete per R.A. 8293, Sec.178.4. "In the case of a work commissioned by a person other than an employer of the author and who pays for it and the work is made in pursuance of the commission, the person who so commissioned the work shall have ownership of the work, but the copyright thereto shall remain with the creator, unless there is a written stipulation to the contrary." This means, unless evidence of a formal document exists between the sculptor and the provincial government of Bulacan, the precautionary principle treats the sculptor as still the copyright holder. Restore this image only if FOP is introduced here officially and formally. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vera Voloshina
[edit]No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain as required by Russian law
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete insufficient author information for {{PD-Russia}}. --Mosbatho (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:BELARUS does not provide sufficient information to determine if this logo is protected by copyright. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park-Statue-Chapel-Stations of the Cross, Bayambang 2020
[edit]Since my request is ignored ill do it myself. No freedom of pano in the phils. Statue is copyrighted. 2019 completion https://www.philstar.com/entertainment/2019/04/16/1910297/bayambang-makes-it-guinness-records/ AND https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1066754 - JQS Builders, ARCHITECT Jerry Suratos, Engr. Aaron Villafuerte and Jericho Roble. Also to note the artistic figurines, stained glass windows, altars, etc
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 10.jpg - Delete as a modern building and fixture that is part of the complex. Following reviews are conducted by me - JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 14.jpg - Delete as the same modern building
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 15.jpg - Delete same as above
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 17.jpg - Weak keep as a small part of the building is shown
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 18.jpg - Weak keep perhaps COM:DM to the altar?
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 21.jpg - Delete altar artistic work
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 22.jpg - Delete altar artistic work
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 23.jpg - Delete altar artistic work
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 24.jpg - Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 25.jpg - Delete stained glass
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 26.jpg - Delete stained glass
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 27.jpg -
Unsure - File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 29.jpg - Weak keep perhaps COM:DM? (to the altar work)
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 30.jpg - Delete up to "... Prayer Park 33" as altar artistic work
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 31.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 32.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 33.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 34.jpg Delete stained glass
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 35.jpg Delete tained glass
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 36.jpg Delete up to "...Prayer Park 43" as the 2019 statue itself is depicted.
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 37.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 38.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 39.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 40.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 41.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 42.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 43.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 44.jpg Weak delete architecture?
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 45.jpg Weak delete architecture?
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 46.jpg Weak delete architecture?
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 47.jpg - Delete the statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 48.jpg Weak delete architecture?
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 49.jpg Weak delete architecture?
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 50.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 51.jpg Unsure base of the statue
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 52.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 53.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 54.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 55.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 56.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 57.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 58.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 59.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 60.jpg Delete up to "...Prayer Park 63" as they show the 2019 statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 61.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 62.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 63.jpg
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 64.jpg - Unsure base of the statue
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 65.jpg - Weak keep the stained glass may be accessory (COM:DM), and other objects are not sufficient to pass COM:Threshold of originality.
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 66.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 67.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 68.jpg - Weak keep same case as that of "...Prayer Park 65"
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 69.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6695Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 70.jpg Delete up to "...Prayer Park 05" statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 01.jpg
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 02.jpg
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 03.jpg
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 04.jpg
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 05.jpg
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 06.jpg - Keep COM:DM or COM:TOO
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 07.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 08.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 09.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 10.jpg Keep COM:DM or COM:TOO
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 11.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 12.jpg Delete stained glass work
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 13.jpg Keep COM:TOO or no copyrightable elements
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 14.jpg Keep general view, no copyrighted object
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 15.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 16.jpg - Keep general view
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 17.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 18.jpg - Keep COM:TOO
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 19.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 21.jpg - Keep COM:DM
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 22.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 23.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 24.jpg - COM:TOO so Keep
- File:6767Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 25.jpg - Delete stained glass artistic work
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 01.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 02.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 03.jpg - Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 04.jpg - Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 05.jpg - Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 06.jpg Delete stained glass artwork is central here
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 07.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 08.jpg Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 09.jpg Delete statue itself
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 11.jpg - Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 12.jpg Delete stained glass artistic work
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 13.jpg Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 14.jpg Weak keep DM?
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 15.jpg Delete stained glass artistic work
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 16.jpg - Weak keep statue is silhouette
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 17.jpg Weak keep statue is silhouette
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 18.jpg Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 19.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 20.jpg Keep TOO
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 21.jpg Keep DM
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 23.jpg Delete stained glass artowrk
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 24.jpg Keep DM
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 25.jpg Weak keep probable DM
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 26.jpg Delete stained glass artwork
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 27.jpg Weak delete architecture
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 28.jpg Weak delete architecture
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 29.jpg Delete details of statue still visible
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 40.jpg Delete 3-D structure of the logo
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 41.jpg Delete 3-D structure of the logo
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 42.jpg - Unsure base of the said 3-D structure
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 57.jpg - statue is obscured by the sun. Keep
- File:6792Saint Vincent Ferrer Prayer Park 58.jpg - Keep also obscured by the sun JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely ::::: In addition, I requested permission and I was granted by both a) the Office of the Mayor whom I even photographed and the b) the Archbishop of Lingayen-Dagupan Socrated Villegas c) the Office of the Parish Priest of the St. Vincent Ferrer Church of Bayambang whom I even Photographed: these subjects are owned by the Church and Donors like us how even how small, for I reiterate that no sculptor or architect has moral right when the Catholic Church Archbishop is now the Owner and the Municipal Government of Bayambang initiated this project and is also a titular of the subject; this is the property of the Government donated to the churchJudgefloro (talk) 07:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Per my review of the above files (made easier through browsing of "d"-marked files on my Visual File Change): Delete most unfortunately. Unsure about the others, but perhaps Keep a couple of files. The statue is recent according to w:List of tallest statues. It is the uploader's COM:Project scope/Evidence burden to prove the copyright transfer between Architect Jerry Suratos and the Church. See also Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Freedom of panorama for religious works and properties. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I was more conservative and deleted some borderline cases, too. But enormous thanks to JWilz12345 for help. I have also deleted some pictures that are ineligible due to copyright (like statue not seen due to the Sun or glass door): while they are OK in terms of copyright, I am not sure they have educational value. --rubin16 (talk) 10:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
although owned by the government, the LGU is not obliged to force the creators to withdraw their moral rights to them whether architecture or sculptures, and this is reinforced in the new copyright rules for government works. no freedom of pano in phil
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 02.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 03.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 04.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 05.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 06.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 07.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 08.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 09.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 10.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 11.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 12.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 13.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 14.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 15.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 16.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 17.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 18.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 19.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 20.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 21.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 22.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 23.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 24.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 25.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 26.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 27.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 28.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 29.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 30.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 31.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 32.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 33.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 34.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 35.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 36.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 37.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 38.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 39.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 40.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandLandmarkfvf 41.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 01.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 02.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 03.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 05.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 06.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 07.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 08.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 09.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 10.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 11.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 12.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 13.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 14.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 15.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 16.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 17.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 18.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 19.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapandWelcomeLandmarkfvf 22.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 01.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 02.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 03.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 05.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 06.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 07.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 08.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 09.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 11.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 12.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 14.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 15.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 16.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 17.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 18.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 19.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 20.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 21.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 22.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 23.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 24.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 25.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 26.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 27.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 28.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 29.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 30.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 31.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 32.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 33.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 34.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 35.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 36.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 37.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 38.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 39.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 40.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 41.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 42.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 43.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 44.JPG
- File:JfSan LeonardoNueva EcijaMapLandmarkfvf 45.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Simple utilitarian structure. Exception: the close-up images of the map (that is DW). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, and I hereby copy paste herein my Consolidated Reply: Request for time to comment on Deletion Request Entry pages as I hereby reiterate my concise past published legal discussions I hereby reserve a right to supplement this short reply by a more specific discussion a day or two, thanks and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
P199 youre misguided. The fact that simplicity claim was not honored at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Bank_of_the_Philippine_Islands means even plain structures are copyrighted. This disxussion i recently visited and digested where your moderator jim once said: - """""Exactly half of the 122 countries that we have information on (including the Philippines) do not have any FOP. It is important to remember that FOP is an exception to ordinary copyright which prohibits the reproduction in any form of copyrighted works, so the absense of any provision for FOP cannot be unclear -- it simply isn't there. As for the"plainness" argument, The Philippine law says:
"172.1 Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose."
That is similar to the law in other countries.""""" Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Simplicity or "plainness" is certainly an argument against deletion, because such shapes/structures are simply not copyrightable. I recognize that this is subjective, but in this case, we're well on the right side of caution. IMO, it is closing admin for the DR you quoted that is misguided: for copyright to apply, a work needs to have copyrightable elements. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Since Jameslwoodward is mentioned here, I may ping him for some input over the derivative works on this FOP case. @Jameslwoodward: . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't have time tonight to look closely at this, but I think User:P199 has it right. The road signs and the column have nothing copyrightable. In the ten images I looked at, there was nothing of note in the surroundings. Therefore the only images I would delete would be those that show the black shape at the bottom close enough to see the map, text, and icons displayed there. all of which do have copyrights. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: most are either trivial or DM is applicable. I have seen a couple of images that could be non-free due to derivative works but it is not fair to nominate a big category to make sysops review each of files. Please, nominate separately the files that are actually breaking the licensing rules here. --rubin16 (talk) 10:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Picasso's work is not in PD Goesseln (talk) 16:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete PD in US, not PD in source of origin. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
unused COM:PENIS
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - These penis pictures aren't great, but they do represent racial demographics the majority of penis photos don't. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. E4024 (talk) 20:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
All Unused COM:PORN
- File:Penis in used Condom.jpg
- File:Penis in empty Condom.jpg
- File:Glans Penis Close-Up.JPG
- File:Scrotum raphe.jpg
- File:Glans Penis.JPG
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - They're good quality photos, and have been here for 10 years. No reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The upload date of an image is not a reason to keep or delete an image. Monochrome photos I would not think would be realistically used for an educational purpose.—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There's no reason for deletion. COM:PORN says "Low-quality pornographic images that do not contribute anything educationally useful to our existing collection of images are not needed on Wikimedia Commons", so doesn't really apply to decade-old images. Old image are more likely to be used on older versions of pages, and to have discouraged people from uploading images they thought would be duplicate. It'd be nice if "low-quality images that do not contribute anything educationally useful" applied to more than just nudes.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tpenarroja (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two of these images claim to be COM:TOO, which doesn't make sense since they are both portraits. The other image has a dubious own work claim, since there is no information on when the photo was taken, which appears not to be 2 June 2016.
- File:Primera estampa de Recaredo Centelles.jpg
- File:Recaredo Centelles Abad.png
- File:LeopoldoPeñarrojaCentelles.jpg
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:SM Seaside City Cebu
[edit]No freedom of panorama in phils. 2015 bldg according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_Seaside_City_Cebu
- File:Cebu Seaside Arena.jpg
- File:SM Seaside City Cebu Entrance.jpg
- File:SM Seaside City Cebu Mountain Wing Entrance.jpg
- File:SM Seaside City Cebu.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
To counter "plainness" argument used for phil malls. is one deletion req i recently digested and researched. At https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Bank_of_the_Philippine_Islands, your moderator jim once said: - """""Exactly half of the 122 countries that we have information on (including the Philippines) do not have any FOP. It is important to remember that FOP is an exception to ordinary copyright which prohibits the reproduction in any form of copyrighted works, so the absense of any provision for FOP cannot be unclear -- it simply isn't there. As for the"plainness" argument, The Philippine law says:
"172.1 Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose."
That is similar to the law in other countries.""""" Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020102010002297 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020102010003705 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:SM_Seaside_City_Cebu_Mountain_Wing_Entrance.jpg” under ticket:2020102010002135. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:SM_Seaside_City_Cebu_Entrance.jpg” under ticket:2020102010002135. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:SM_Seaside_City_Cebu.jpg” under ticket:2020102010002135. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment the building was designed by WV Coscolluela & Associates, with Arquitectonica as the consultant. Interior designs were done by Wow Architects (from w:SM Seaside City Cebu). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission received from the photographer, not an architect, so, not applicable. --rubin16 (talk) 10:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Die angegebene "gemeinfreiheit" ist zweifelhaft; Quelle:https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.de&sl=auto&sp=nmt4&tl=de&u=https://www.pop.culture.gouv.fr/notice/memoire/AP03W01054&usg=ALkJrhiTxoej0Djh6p_zkVUf_gunGkB0_A Gomera-b (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of CC license at https://www.instagram.com/hicharliepowell/ C.Fred (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Books for developing countries;a guide for enlisting private-industry assistance. (IA booksfordevelopi00fran).pdf
[edit]Post 1964 work, so assumed copyright in the US ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Prepared by Franklin Book Programs for USAID. While the latter is a government agency, it's not their work. There's no copyright notice, so possibly {{PD-US-no notice}}, but there's the question of publication; if this was something meant to be handed out only to an advisory committee, then I don't know if that counts. clpo13(talk) 23:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The note on the title page leads me to believe that this was published, and without a notice, thus
PD-US-no notice. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC).
Kept: PD-US-no notice. --rubin16 (talk) 10:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
1964 work, Not a work of US Government ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see a copyright notice, but I didn't check all 1000+ pages. clpo13(talk) 20:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-no notice. --rubin16 (talk) 10:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:The Julia Davis collection- Negro and African literature and culture; a bibliography (IA juliadaviscollec00stlo).pdf
[edit]Post 1964 work, Not ncessarily US Gov work as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe {{PD-US-no notice}}. However, it's not clear if or when it was actually published since the 1971 date comes from a stamp, not the work itself. That said, the bibliography portion (everything from page 5 on) is almost certainly uncopyrightable as it's just a collection of facts. clpo13(talk) 23:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- I presume it must have been published in or before 1971, so
PD-US-no noticeshould apply. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC).
- I presume it must have been published in or before 1971, so
Kept: PD-US-no notice. --rubin16 (talk) 10:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
doubtful to be own work given that its from 1938 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 21:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 21:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". Look at the author name at MD also. E4024 (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files by Mikhail Alexandrovich Salye
[edit]- File:1001 Nights-Russian censored version-page I.tif
- File:1001 Nights-Russian censored version-page III.tif
- File:1001 Nights-Russian censored version-page II.tif
Pages are from a 1933 Russian translation translated by w:en:Mikhail Salye, 1899-1963. (Given that the text was omitted in 1933, I don't know when this publication comes from, but it should be irrelevant.) Thus these pages are not PD in the Soviet Union or in the US. --Prosfilaes (talk) 21:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Errore nel caricamento Lorenzo Andreozzi (talk) 22:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} removed by Goesseln (talk · contribs) without rationale. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Isa Vermehren 1945-05-05.png AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
While the original photograph may be PD-old, according to https://www.gjtaiwan.com/new/?p=29059 the colorization is modern. Per https://cdn.loc.gov/copyright/history/mls/ML-366.pdf, the colorization of a public-domain image may be copyrightable if that colorization is above the threshold of originality. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Flag of North Macedonia.svg SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: processed as duplicate. --rubin16 (talk) 10:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}