Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 30th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to me that all pics of this artist without an article are self promotion and not own work as declared. E4024 (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakely it has been taken Paraskaushik 525 (talk) 02:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make new sandbox Paraskaushik 525 (talk) 02:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 07:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not of educational use, contains multiple probably copyrighted works Tangerineduel (talk) 08:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP, apparent copyvio, COM:DW of several copyrighted works. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, not "own work". Name of photographer and copyright note in metadata. 217.239.14.88 06:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyvio so speedy and deleted - thanks. --Herby talk thyme 11:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio, source video no longer exists DHN (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 09:49, 30 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen bajo copyright - https://www.zeleb.es/sites/default/files/styles/news_main_image/public/rocio_durcal_en_una_vieja_postal.png saca de Internet y subida a commons si permiso. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 03:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 09:49, 30 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Copvio copyright violation 196.195.18.218 10:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:19, 30 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: copyright violation --Krdbot 13:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I only nominate the version from 12:16, 30 April 2020 for deletion NOT the whole other part of the file. The file update is a copyvio and needs to be deleted. Hangman'sDeath (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And the version from 13:46, 30 April 2020. THe user keeps updating the file with the copyvio. --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 13:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: and rev deleted 2 versions per COM:OVERWRITE. --Achim (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photo of a photo/sign, no educational value Tangerineduel (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted:  Speedily deleted as an unambiguous copyvio. --Storkk (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright vilolation 196.195.18.218 10:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 12:21, 30 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://allsportspages.com/psl/player/shadab-khan/ --Krdbot 19:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is the subject. Most definitely not an own work. acagastya 16:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Green Giant at 16:22, 30 April 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by AlirezaKohany. Part of a crosswiki spam campaign. --Krdbot 19:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is the subject. Most definitely not an own work. acagastya 16:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Green Giant at 16:22, 30 April 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by AlirezaKohany. Part of a crosswiki spam campaign. --Krdbot 19:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text elements in this file were not written correctly and do not render. I am the original uploader and want this deleted Erikdactyl (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:51, 30 April 2020 UTC: I am the original uploader, and the text was written incorrectly and does not render. --Krdbot 01:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор неизвестен, установить фото в общественном достоянии невозможно, необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Надпись на обороте фотоотпечатка "фото - К. А. Петров (1907-1942)". Автор фотографии умер 78 лет назад, следовательно, изображение доступно по лицензии { {PD-old-70} }, которая свидетельствует о нахождении данного произведения в общественном во всех странах.

Ни каких противоречий с правилами Википедии нет. Creator-AP (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2020042810007324 Dogad75 (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2020042810007324. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of bust Эlcobbola talk 15:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn: uploader has indicated this bust is in Bristol (U.K.) and thus should be acceptable per {{FoP-UK}}. --Эlcobbola talk 15:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Lb-aachtafofzegst.ogg Soued031 (talk) 17:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 16:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary; Distribution is only within Australia MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

purely Australian distribution. World map unnecessare MargaretRDonald (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Antisemitic design, presenting a Star of David next to a poison symbol along with references to the September 11 attack, apparently referencing an antisemitic meme about this font (link is to Wikipedia and SFW). Been deleted off the English Wikipedia with good reason. Blythwood (talk) 18:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Objectional content is not a reason for deletion. See COM:NOTCENSORED. Furthermore the character sequence with antisemetic connotations is one of the most recognisable charachter sequences of historical significance in the font Wingdings. --17jiangz1 (talk) 04:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
17jiangz1, I've looked through your contributions history and you've made a lot of valuable contributions. I can only express my hope that what happened is that you misunderstood the cultural context and that you didn't get that this is completely not OK. There's a big difference between including antisemitic content on here for historical documentation and designing new antisemitic images (one you wanted to be the lead image for a Wikipedia article about an otherwise inoffensive font, no less). I urge you to replace this image with one that doesn't have this text. Blythwood (talk) 08:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Blythwood: Okay, I get the point you're making, and have updated the file to remove the antisemitic string. Thanks for your input. --17jiangz1 (talk) 08:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept (non-admin-closure) - 17jiangz1, that's fine. I withdraw the deletion request. Blythwood (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very badly blurred, no use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 20:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JensiD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, no source, no valid author, no license. Please explain why images are public domain in Czech Republic.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. This list included several duplicates of existing free files, some reuploads of previously deleted images but most of these have to be considered copyright violations. --De728631 (talk) 19:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JensiD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No apparent own work, some images have ghostly overprinting from true sources. Maps are unsourced.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. E.g. in File:Mapa Ostrava final.jpg you could see that it was scanned from a book since the lines of printed text on the backside of the image were faintly visible. --De728631 (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: cropped, from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0803711/ Rennrigor (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Although the same clothing and event, not exactly the same image. Different smile, and IMDB picture is not this high resolution. Kissa21782 (talk) 07:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
you are right, I withdraw the nomination. --Rennrigor (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion and nomination withdrawal. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 03:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ashish S Sharma .jpg for previous. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sukhdeep Brar jm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heatiack (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion of another famous DJ, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dauercompu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host.

Achim (talk) 07:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional + not a webhost + photos of a non-contributor

QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 04:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 10:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of copyright document Mindmatrix 13:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 03:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private picture. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 14:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 03:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 03:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ManuelRodriguex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images. The subject's WP:ES article has been deleted for lack of notability. All of the images are small and have no EXIF, so I doubt that they are actually {{Own work}} as claimed. I have deleted several blatant copyvios uploaded by this editor.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Commons is not your personal free web host. See also Special:DeletedContributions/ManuelRodriguex. --Achim (talk) 18:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused very low-res football kits and photo, no description, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaime1968 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused fantasy map, flag, and banknote, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rabbitboy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Is JK notable? No entry found in wp and wikidata, but it could be under a different name. If not notable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by João Luís Oliva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope, and DW, copyvio. P 1 9 9   18:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emilylynneclare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very likely not own works: Low-res and low-quality photos all of the same person, mostly no EXIF data. I find it hard to believe that the photographer was present at every occasion.

P 1 9 9   19:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality, blurry. Unusable. P 1 9 9   19:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aboullaite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos of non-notable event, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joao Monteiro Neto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M. smoos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal artworks, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope; or mission permission, copyvio.

P 1 9 9   19:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tiennghianguyen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: Small low-res images that look like they were taken from a corporate website.

P 1 9 9   19:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejo7375 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional images, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bilogia22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low quality diagrams without clear purpose, little educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Popetititiana-FMI-13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text-only images, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image for fictional band and tour, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal fan art, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 21:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie no education use Perumalism (talk) 15:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal images no education use Perumalism (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie no education use Perumalism (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie no education use Perumalism (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie no educational use Perumalism (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image from April 1 upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images, no permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat talk ] 11:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat talk ] 11:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gallery of images stated to be own work, but with only 1 image containing camera metadata, and several others showing reasons to believe they are derivative works, copied from Facebook, and so on. Also some packaging, and what looks to be a drone shot or two and an architectural model.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality PDF, unusable. Image shouldn't be in PDF format anyway. P 1 9 9   19:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 10:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hosorin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional photographs from Phillippine Airlines: https://umi-aozora.com/philippine_airlines_02/

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, appears to be personal photos. Tangerineduel (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With source Google.com, it is highly unlikely that the license given is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Online source, no permission - appears to be just copied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement? Screenshot from a website? Mjrmtg (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2000 Martin Sg. (talk) 18:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 18:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tangerineduel as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not educationally useful, lacks context / info to usefully categorise
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. As nobody is identifiable, image might be useful. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license given by the uploader looks false, the source https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Local/Express-News/royal-leaders-embraced-20160628 claims "All rights reserved" Jan Kameníček (talk) 18:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tangerineduel as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not educationally useful, doesn't illustrate the subject
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

note free https://www.wonderlandmagazine.com/2019/03/28/hero-fiennes-tiffin-interview/ AwkwardChester (talk) 18:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a my own work and I do not give permission for its usage on this site. 99.145.200.211 18:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per EXIF. --Achim (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously misspelled, see German Wiktionary: Wodka (starts with a capital letter!), file with correct spelling already exists, see De-Wodka.ogg Jeuwre (talk) 19:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Outourly. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, comparison between username and text in file suggests that this is a promotion for the uploader Sam-2727 (talk) 20:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value, not on any Wikipedia page. Sam-2727 (talk) 22:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value in the picture. Sam-2727 (talk) 22:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST Gatemansgc (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably also a copyright policy violation: Lacks source and permission for using the cliparts. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING 毒島みるく (talk) 23:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING 毒島みるく (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING 毒島みるく (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-wikipedian - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 08:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, nothing identifying enough to categorise. Tangerineduel (talk) 07:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, nothing identifying enough to categorise. Tangerineduel (talk) 07:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, nothing identifying enough to categorise. Tangerineduel (talk) 07:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, too cropped to have anything useful. Tangerineduel (talk) 07:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image. Without explanation has no educational value. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I believe that this is a wonderful image to illustrate somethng akin to the first romance of a child. However, the very small size of the image and lack of any description makes me believe that this is a copy from some stock image website or similar. Due to that I must vote  Delete. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 18:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frostzwerg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused not rotaed versions of File:Naturschutzgebiet Wittmoor Karte.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Little educational use, lacks enough context or info to categorise Tangerineduel (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, very odd angle, no clear subject for categorisation Tangerineduel (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Р. Д. Кулиш (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотографии сделаны более 40 лет назад, оцифровано в неше время. Необходимо обращение в OTRS

Dogad75 (talk) 21:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • ?? В чем собственно проблема ??

?? Как их можно было оцифровать в 73 или 83 году??

Роман Дмитриевич Кулиш — Preceding unsigned comment added by Р. Д. Кулиш (talk • contribs) 13:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Родные профессора Парыгина попросили у меня права опубликовать сделанные мной когда-то давно фотографии, они их и оцифровали. Я согласился. И не очень понимаю, что именно еще вы хотите? Роман Дмитриевич Кулиш. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Р. Д. Кулиш (talk • contribs) 13:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by George.miltiyadoff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook size images without metadata, unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted work by Peyo Panteleev, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Israel is a common law country so this is above the threshold of originality. No evidence that the logo is licensed under a CC license. Sam-2727 (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawing nomination since OTRS permission has been received. Sam-2727 (talk) 14:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DejaVu as no permission (No permission since) also it use before at https://www.instagram.com/p/BP2w441BswL/ Déjà vu 01:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No indication of a free license at https://www.instagram.com/p/BP2w441BswL/. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, taken from here: https://www.deviantart.com/dibgd/art/Gnathabelodon-thorpei-285748260, incompatible license there. Землеройкин (talk) 09:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & watermarked. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concern of copyright violation. The up-loader copied this picture from search results of yahoo. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: found elsewhere on the web. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res photograph from a user whose contributions are all taken from elsewhere Ytoyoda (talk) 15:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: suspectedly copied from [1]. --Yasu (talk) 15:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

本标志因有新版本而弃用 Cryberghost (talk) 12:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS failed. --JuTa 01:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image - low resolution (indicating not own work too). Mirer (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete A small number of personal images is allowed if they are available under a free licence unless that licence is GFDL. In this case, however, the user hasn't even used that image on their user namespace and that file is the only contribution on this project. I would oppose the deletion if the user were an active member, but this is not the case. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 18:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:13, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should NOT be deleted. I, one of the owners of this bike I have full ownership of this photo. The photo was listed on other sites just because it was part of some competitions. Ion.morozan (talk) 01:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Owning an object does not confer copyright of photos of that object. The photographer will have to confirm a free license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:Storkk. --P 1 9 9   16:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.facebook.com/jornalturmadabarra/posts/1228206247344762/ O revolucionário aliado (talk) 01:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made this image as an improvement of the previous venn diagram on the article Boundary (topology), but after making the venn diagram I am not sure the relations are correct so I would like to verify the relations are correct before I reupload a revised version of the previous venn diagram. Thank you. Jputrycz (talk) 02:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All uploads by the user seem to be internet robbery. E4024 (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same deleted file? E4024 (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? E4024 (talk) 02:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   16:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two scenarios: either this is an original work and the uploader likely doesn't have the copyright to it, or this is below the threshold of originality and it has an incorrect license (in which case {{PD-textlogo}} should be used). Sam-2727 (talk) 02:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work, but low-res screengrab, and above TOO. --P 1 9 9   16:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. The colors are wrong. 2. The logo is has been superseded by a new one reflecting the organization's name change (to National Science Teaching Association). 3. The logo was proprietary and was not meant to be freely used. TMW (talk) 03:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Being superseded by a newer logo does not bring the old logo out of project scope. Commons has many logos no longer in use by their parent organizations. Deletion is also not a proper response to allegations of incorrect colors. Finally, the licensing information on the page is adequate. While this is indeed a trademark, I do not believe it is copyrighted due to it being a fairly simple text logo, so it should meet Commons' licensing requirements. Jadebenn (talk) 07:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Jadebenn. --P 1 9 9   16:54, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

此文件有问题,显示不出来,而且无用 Cryberghost (talk) 03:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selbst hochgeladen. Habe eine neue verbesserte Version mit anderem Bildnamen hochgeladen. Diese ist redundant geworden. Sciencia58 (talk) 06:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte löscht diese Grafik, sie enthält einen falschen Eintrag, es gibt eine neue mit anderem Namen mit überprüften belegten Einträgen. Sciencia58 (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   16:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Grafik ist der Vorlage zu ähnlich, nach der ich die Neuzeichnung gemacht habe. Bitte löschen! Sciencia58 (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own draft for a graphic, which I uploaded myself. The German colleagues in Wikipedia gave me many hints what needs to be changed and improved. This graphic contains errors. It is too similar to the template used and could be interpreted as copyright infringement. I have created a new graphic that looks different and uploaded it with a new name. This one is bad and redundant. I already asked for deletion two weeks ago. There is no reason to keep it. Please delete it now. Thanks. Sciencia58 (talk) 08:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   16:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phonyfilm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Movie stills: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Is it a frame still or PR photo? – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 08:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dunno. It doen't change very much. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard License from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the blogger created the individual images. FunkMonk (talk) 07:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The skeletal seems to be taken from Franoys ([2]), albeit with a different soft-tissue profile of the sail and belly. Slate Weasel (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the blogger created the individual images. FunkMonk (talk) 07:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2173611776039625&set=a.121142221286601&type=3&theater Cheep (talk) 07:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for publicity purposes by a company providing a commercial service. Edelseider (talk) 07:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that Socialist Workers Party releases its works into the public domain MB298 (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

拡張子を間違えて設定してしまったため 240B:11:960:1E00:50B6:2F17:7DA2:9499 09:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hamish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:Coptic Bible.JPG. That a file that we have hosted for over 12 years and is used on dozens of sister sites is found elsewhere on the web is not a criteria for speedy deletion. On the other hand, the book is not obviously old enough to be Public Domain. Storkk (talk) 09:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper Google search: all images that have been on Commons for some time are copied elsewhere online. And assuming this is indeed a Bible, then the text is obviously long out of copyright. --P 1 9 9   17:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bildbeschreibung enthält Werbung (Telefonnummern) 2.202.79.57 09:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed, all descriptions of uploads by this user do contain ads. Some images are not bad and in use, so I suggest keeping them and remove the descs. --Achim (talk) 12:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nice pic of rails. Advertising in description removed. --P 1 9 9   17:13, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie? https://www.startupmgzn.com/english/features/inside-story-samar-almeer/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Previously published, needs OTRS. --P 1 9 9   17:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file appears to be copyrighted and no sufficient information has been provided to show that the uploader is the actual copyright owner. Keivan.fTalk 05:34, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Mattbuck for violating copyright. GFJ (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Samar3.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned historical paper photos of different years and from different countries, definitely made by official photographers, authorized by Ministry of Foreign Affairs, so unlikely to be uploaders' own works as claimed.

VLu (talk) 11:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seviyo Sohbet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JapaneseFilmmaker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Movie stills: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niet langer in gebruik op Wikipedia. Wouter Sere [3] 11:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouter Sere (talk • contribs) 11:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KAN MIJN FOTO NA WEKEN GELEDEN HET VERZOEK TE HEBBEN INGEDIEND NU EENS WORDEN VERWIJDERD !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouter Sere (talk • contribs) 23:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   17:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be some poster. Unlikely to be own work. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the uploader has licensed the photo, we need a license from the person(s) who made the flyer, because it is under copyright, unless there is an exclusion. FredWalsh (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by File:Executive Committee Range.png Gemini1980 (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo consists of mostly product labels/packaging which may be copyrighted 67.184.0.138 14:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete While the text in the trademark is below the threshhold of originality, the images are definitely creative and are not simple shapes (they are photographs). ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 18:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniqui04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, bogus license. More info needed.

Yann (talk) 17:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniqui04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, and UK TOO is quite low, so this is probably eligible for copyright ~~ Alex Noble - talk 15:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9   17:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, sign is covered by people. Tangerineduel (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I could imagine this being useful for an article on Wikivoyage or national parks in general. On the other hand, it may fail COM:FOP Australia. Storkk (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adidshome (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. \

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aduclehomo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work, a view of a school, logo of school and academic. Small file sizes and no meta.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept logo: in use and PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9   17:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size and "quality", no metadata, not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely own work, no one has spaceships that have been here but perhaps NASA. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of File:The Earth and the Moon photographed from Mars orbit.jpg. --P 1 9 9   17:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Simple shapes and plain text. In use. --P 1 9 9   17:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website is copyright, Author is shown as Lucien Martel. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork without author permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Unknown photographer" doesn't result in a free license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photos are not automatically "own work" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. See https://habr.com/ru/post/158273/ and https://www.pvsm.ru/televidenie/19831 Bilgemagma (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photographers do not automatically result in free images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photographer is not the same thing as "free image." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photographer is not the same thing as "free image." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photographer is not the same thing as "free image." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post card is not own work, photographer is credited in description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With no source other than "own work" it is impossible to verify the statements in the description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definately not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photographer is not the same thing as "free image." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope art Mindmatrix 16:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:43, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of basemap or data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: very simple base map, no copyrightable elements. In use. --P 1 9 9   17:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este logo no es de uso libre. Seloponsio (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Este contenido no es relevante y no es de uso libre Seloponsio (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Este contenido no es relevante y no es de uso libre Seloponsio (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-text, but unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a screenshot from 'on the roofs' climbing the Shanghai Tower. Absolutely insane video, but here it's a copyvio. Cookies4ever (talk) 19:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasonable evidence is not presented that the author's name (e.g., the original photographer) was not published with a claim of copyright in conjunction with the image within 70 years of its original publication. This information is needed not the uploader´s opinion or their unability to find valid information 88.67.45.19 19:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be the Photographer. I don't thinks so. A second upload had a different photographer's name in the Exif data Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own image as per Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:ShaquilleSpinnin.png. Needs OTRS. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Cerro Armazones.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a photo of me from before I started taking hormones as a trans woman and would rather not have it up... 2001:16B8:46C3:9A00:D0F0:2AF2:CCFC:A6C8 21:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

and deletion with regards to ""Photographs of identifiable people" 2001:16B8:46C3:9A00:D0F0:2AF2:CCFC:A6C8 21:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I am the photographer of this picture and I support the deletion request! (And I might also add that we already have a newer photo of Alex Alvina Chamberland in use.) /Sofie Sigrinn (talk) 21:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I support this request too. Ainali (talk) 13:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Les logos de marque déposée ne doivent pas être importés sur Wikimedia Commons mais localement sur fr.wiki afin de respecter les droits d'auteur, comme fait ici : fr:Fichier:Logo Rugby Club Courbevoie.png.
English: Non free logo, it should have been uploaded locally on fr.wiki.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 22:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hangman'sDeath as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|Not own work, no indication that this file is CC licenced. Unlike the other nomination for this uploader, this image does not contain a statement of copyright in the metadata. However it does have a unique transmission ID which would indicate a Facebook or Instagram source. Please use deletion nomination for any cases which are not clear-cut or supported by meta / image search or other data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same batch as image from https://www.htr.ch/story/wir-muessen-authentisch-und-einzigartig-sein-24237.html
One image already got deleted as copyvio, The user has only one edit and the EXIF is missing. Even I can pin point the location - yet - where the image was taken from, the state of copyvio is pretty evident
--Hangman'sDeath (talk) 19:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hangman'sDeath (talk · contribs) The image you provide as source is cropped. The one here is a full image. Not that I actually disagree with you, but we cannot just delete "because you say so." Actual proof must be provided. On this image, I would point out that there is a unique transmission Identifier which is likely to be from Instagram or Facebook, that the image is of small quality relative to its size, and that images have been found on the internet which are cropped from this Large Image, but which predate (2019) the upload of the Large Image at Commons (2020). Then the closing administrator can check off the items presented as data, and remove the image. "No indication that..." would require the proving of a negative which is usually not possible. What is needed for speedy is actual data: Larger, older image - absolutely identical with the one being nominated - at a particular URL, and/or meta data showing copyright or source. If you cannot provide that, then go to deletion nomination and provide the arguments by which you feel it is a copyright violation, or out of scope. Please do not be curt or condescending to your colleagues on this platform. I have been here long enough not to delete on instinct "because someone said so." I have watched multiple cases where that has gotten the administrator in the hot water of public opinion. Help the mop-wielders out... provide everything you've got. This is not a race to the finish of who can do more of what than anyone else, but a situation of cooperation between colleagues on a project. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not only looking at where the image can be found but at the whole situation. This also includes where I found the image, but this further includes the image data itself and what the uploader has contributed so far. There is no EXIF data available. This is a strong hint that something is fishy and not an actual "own work". The uploader has only one edit, but uploads an image with rather high quality. Also very unusual on Commons. Could be possible though. When the image already is somewhere else on the internet it is even less likely that the image really is the uploader's own work. The simple question here is what is more likely: That the image was first on Commons or somewhere on the web. See also [4].
I don't expect anybody to delete an image because I said so. Every admin can do whatever they think fits the situation. If they think this should be handeled with a regular DR, so be it. Even this is slightly out of the beaten path, I think the speedy deletion is the right way to go because I'm very confident that this image is not the uploader's own work. It is nothing but a plain and simple violation of copyright and should be deleted as fast as possible.
I also don't consider adding a requests for speedy deletion is a particularly harsh or unfriendly thing to do since there are so many warning signs on Commons that say "DO NOT UPLOAD COPYRIGHTED CONTENT". That people upload files that must not be uploaded to Commons in the first place is the real insult. It is an insult to everybody who spends time on reviewing images and deleting them. I do not want to read this long and boring guideline that explains that I am not allowed to upload copyrighted content. I will also not read this guideline that says personal images are out of scope and must not be uploaded. Instead these people take the time from everybody on the system. People have to review the images, nominate them for deletion and discuss with other who say "you are not sure? Like 1ike 100% SURE, are you?". Just because some people are not willing to read simple guidelines they waste the time of other people^4!
I could be wrong though: So please @Msvj33: tell us more about the image! When was it taken. Where was it taken. How were you able to take this high quality image? It's nothing against you, I just want to verify your claim.
--Hangman'sDeath (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hangman'sDeath (talk · contribs) You may wish to read COM:SPEEDY for policy here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellin Beltz: Is there anything you reffer to in particular? --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 16:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res photo of non-notable musician, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very small without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Missing permission. --P 1 9 9   17:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko Please read "Summary" before requesting to delete the files with the excuse that data is missing, because this data already exists. Thank you!

עמנואל בן חיים (talk) 00:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: to be undeleted respectively in 2050 and 2036, in theory, but PDF seems to be a wrong format for a single page scanned text. Ruthven (msg) 16:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohnsrp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own-work claims. User has had contributions deleted as copyvios. Similar images to MewSuppasit1.jpg and MewSuppasit2.jpg appear over the web, with different credits (e.g. https://twitter.com/Mayakung00/status/1117617548046950405).

Paul_012 (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohnsrp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per above, contributor has uploaded nothing but copyright violations. The history of File:MewSuppasit1.jpg alone shows three different images, two of which are watermarked by two different people. User has demonstrated the need to rigidly apply COM:PCP to their uploads

ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ldnyellow as Copyvio (Copyvio)
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. The provided rationale ("This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license.") isn't really convincing. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The image is under the CC-BY-4.0 license. At the bottom of the page there is a gray icon showing the license. Suzy Oh  tell me 15:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your response Túrelio. I uploaded a different image using the the same source and license and was told that the image had to be deleted because of the same rationale "This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license." I assumed that therefore other images from this source were not allowed and should also be removed. Here is the link to the notice I received. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ldnyellow#File_tagging_File%3AJoy_Park_at_the_2017_Gayo_Daejeon.jpg
I have also looked at the bottom of the page and could not find any license.
Did you use this image? Because those that are dated before 2018 are copyrighted. Not all Tistory blogs have a free license. There is a great majority that publish the images with copyright and that is where the gray icon does not appear. However, MonkeyJunior has it in his most recent images. Suzy Oh  tell me 12:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License reviewed. --Minoraxtalk 05:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Derbake (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works copied from external websites, needs evidence that images are anonym works ("Unknown - probably dead the photo was first published in Lebanon and taken by a government photographer working for the local press") to comply with PD-Lebanon.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Derbake (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works copied from external websites, needs evidence that images have been published one day ("Unknown - probably dead the photo was first published in Syria/Egypt and taken by a government photographer working for the local press").

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick, All that work dates from 2010 is in the public domain and was never noticed. They are images taken from newspapers both in Lebanon, Syria and Egypt. Many of them are from people who died more than forty years ago. Please review this decision. Derbake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derbake (talk • contribs)

@Derbake: The fact that the person pictured are dead more than 40 years is irrelevant since laws of Syria and Egypt talks about publication (not creation) so you have to provide evidence that these images have been published one day in Syria and Egypt. The case is slighty different for Lebanon because they care about creation but only for anonym works so you have to explain how do you know that these works are anonym. You may explain too your genric statement "probably dead the photo was first published in (name of the country) and taken by a government photographer working for the local press" and explain as well how you know that. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: The images are from the beginning of the 20th century. in many cases it is impossible to know who took the photo. Many of them are from 1930s newspapers. Others are images used by government media to provide the culture of their countries. --Derbake (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It strikes me that all that work dates from 2010 is in the public domain and was never noticed. After ten years they notify the deletion when the images are part of hundreds of Wikipedia articles around the world. The images are taken from newspapers in both Lebanon, Syria and Egypt. Many of the artists are people who died more than forty years ago. .Many images are from the beginning of the 20th century. In some cases it is impossible to know who took the photo. Other photographs are from newspapers of the thirties and forties. Others are images used by government media to spread the culture of their countries around the world. Please review this decision. The images in question are under license {PD-Syria} / {PD-Egypt} / {PD-Lebanon}. For example *File: Fatrash.JPG and more.--Derbake (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You doesn't explain neither how do you know that these photos are anonym ("In some cases it is impossible to know who took the photo" doesn't mean they were anonym at publication date) nor how do you know that the authors "are probably dead; the photo was first published in (name of the country) and taken by a government photographer working for the local press" (you are right: it's almost 13 years that you are using this same explaination). May you explain too, because you claim having taken them from newspapers, your inability to provide a valid date of publishing (like a year or a DD/MM/YYYY since each newspaper is dated). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: These images you nominated to delete are in the public domain in Egypt under license {PD-Egypt}. They were all taken before the (1981) requirement for the United States and before the (1987) requirement for Egypt. I consider that they should not have the deletion form. To this we add that many images to which you inserted the deletion form were recently uploaded more than 10 years ago and their licenses were included by Wiki Commons at the time. The deletion of images with licenses {PD-Lebanon} and {PD-Syria} also does not correspond for having expired their rights and being images in the public domain of cultural figures. In the middle of the 20th century, in the countries mentioned, copyright was not taken into account, which is why in the publications of the time it does not establish who took the photograph. Look at the author and the license of this image taken from a newspaper. File:Ahmed Shawqi & Mohammed Abdel Wahab.JPG. Regards---Derbake (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your 2007 files have not been reviewed before and are today so it's now that you may explain how screenshots of copyrighted programs may be PD (in matter fact every single upload by you since 13 years is problematic: please re-read this discussion and comments made by users at the time). But I see you try another time to cloud the issue by not responding to the simple questions I've asked to you. So the questions above remain unanswered and the closing Administrator will appeciate your non-collaboration. Bonus is the question of the day: may you explain too, because you claim having taken them from newspapers, your inability to provide in the Source field the name of the media they have been published in and instead insert a false {{Own}}? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Licencias de dominio publico {PD-Egypt}, {PD-Lebanon}, {PD-Syria}

[edit]
@Patrick Rogel:

Estas imágenes que nominaste para borrar son de dominio publico en Egipto bajo licencia {PD-Egypt}. Las mismas fueron todas tomadas antes de (1981) requisito para los para los Estados Unidos y antes de (1987) requisito para Egipto. Considero que no deben tener la planilla de borrado. A eso le sumamos que muchas imágenes a las que le insertaste la planilla de borrado recientemente fueron subidas hace mas de 10 años y sus licencias fueron incluidas por Wiki Commons en su momento. También no corresponde el borrado de las imágenes con licencias {PD-Lebanon} y {PD-Syria} por haber caducado sus derechos y ser imágenes de dominio publico de figuras culturales. Dime como las enmendamos.

Con licencia {PD-Egypt}

[edit]

Imagenes con licencia {PD-Lebanon}

[edit]

Imagenes con {PD -Syria}

[edit]

--Derbake (talk) 02:14, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

About the File:Marwan Khoury

[edit]

This image File:Marwan khoury مروان خوري.jpg was uploaded on their public official Facebook page of the singer Lebanese Marwan Khoury. The source and author are specified along with the license.

--Derbake (talk) 23:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by JamesLWoodward. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Derbake (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re screenshots, not own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Derbake

[edit]

"Low-re screenshots, not own work"

It is the only free material I have available to illustrate Wikipedia biographies.

As my previous edition was reversed by user Patrick Rogel, I rewrote my release of the remaining files under discussion.--Derbake (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close again. Page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 15:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Trying yet again. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, not own work; work of the Canadian Heraldic Authority Di (they-them) (talk) 22:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom : not own. Granted 1998 too recent to be out of copyright: https://reg.gg.ca/heraldry/pub-reg/project-pic.asp?lang=e&ProjectID=743&ProjectElementID=2635 (website, which bears the mention "The contents of this Register are intended for research purposes only. The heraldic emblems found in the Register may not be reproduced in any form or in any media without the written consent of the Canadian Heraldic Authority and/or the recipient. "). Kathisma (talk) 22:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Procedural close: image already deleted by Túrelio. --Эlcobbola talk 21:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, not own work; work of the Canadian Heraldic Authority Di (they-them) (talk) 22:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom : not own. Granted 2003 too recent to be out of copyright: https://reg.gg.ca/heraldry/pub-reg/project-pic.asp?lang=e&ProjectID=90&ProjectElementID=344 (website which bears the mention "The contents of this Register are intended for research purposes only. The heraldic emblems found in the Register may not be reproduced in any form or in any media without the written consent of the Canadian Heraldic Authority and/or the recipient. "). Kathisma (talk) 22:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Procedural close: image already deleted by Túrelio. --Эlcobbola talk 21:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, not own work; work of the Canadian Heraldic Authority Di (they-them) (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom : not own. Granted 2003 too recent to be out of copyright: https://reg.gg.ca/heraldry/pub-reg/project.asp?lang=e&ProjectID=69 (website which bears the mention "The contents of this Register are intended for research purposes only. The heraldic emblems found in the Register may not be reproduced in any form or in any media without the written consent of the Canadian Heraldic Authority and/or the recipient. "). Kathisma (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Procedural close: image already deleted by Túrelio. --Эlcobbola talk 21:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No credible indication that the parent of this derivative work is an "own work." Contains copyrighted photos and text Sam-2727 (talk) 22:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay now? --Jan Polák (talk) 09:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jan Polák, better. In response to the sentence "if possible, the name of the author (unless the work is an anonymous work) or the name of the person under whose name the work is being introduced in public, the title of the work and its location shall be indicated," is there an author indicated somewhere on the work? If not, then all you need to do is change "own work" to "derivative work" since this contains a substantial reproduction of the copyrighted text. If an author is attributed on that board, then you should add the author's name. Also remove the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license and indicate the location of the work. Sam-2727 (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is it okay now? --Jan Polák (talk) 13:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Licensing was changed to {{FoP-Czech Republic}}, which appears to be appropriate and there has been no discussion for ca. 6 months. If this license is also contested, please open a new DR with a rationale specific thereto. --Эlcobbola talk 21:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the website www.courbevoie-rugby.com allowed to upload the picture here under a free license. - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 23:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly a scan of an old image to which www.courbevoie-rugby.com would be highly unlikely to have rights (COM:PRP). Actual evidence of a free license, or supporting a PD rationale, is needed. --Эlcobbola talk 21:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As was noted by User:PePeEfe on the discussion page last February, the person pictured here is NOT Josef von Sternberg. It is an unidentified person. In the uncropped original version of the picture, Sternberg is the man on the LEFT. The picture is wrongly used to illustrate more than twenty wikipedia articles on Sternberg, and should either be deleted, or replaced by a crop of the man on the LEFT in the uncropped version. Bleuade (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to at least fix the cats here and the picture on Wikidata (which would reduce the usage of the pic in wikipedias ...). But I'm not so sure anymore. This could be Sternberg, as could be the other guy in the source file.
Maybe anyone can get the japanese paper and look it up there (maybe the description was wrong?!). Or some more users are sure, who is who. --Mirer (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The translation from Japanese is "Joseph von Sternberg (left) visiting Japan in 1936" (1936年の訪日時のジョセフ・フォン・スタンバーグ(左端)). I have added another link to a photo from the time, where the filmmaker is seen wearing very similar high boots (or the same ones). I have no doubts that Von Sternberg is the one on the left and that this whole issue stems from a small translation error. --PePeEfe (talk) 08:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Under COM:NPOV and COM:INUSE, the identification issue should be resolved on the many Wikipedias where the file is used. Only once it's unused should it be deleted here. --bjh21 (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Alternatively, a bold contributor might just re-crop the source image correctly... --bjh21 (talk) 10:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are better photos for a crop than that one. If this is not Sternberg, the picture can be deleted. If someone identifies this man, he can be recropped an better named. --Mirer (talk) 15:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: bjh21 is correct. Concerns that a given image is incorrect/inaccurate are ones of COM:SCOPE, and files legitimately in use cannot be deleted for that reason ("A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose." (COM:INUSE)) This request is thus premature; the concern should be raised on the projects using the image and, once it has been universally removed, a new DR can be opened on that basis (i.e., its removal from all sister projects as inaccurate would support a claim that it lacks educational utility.). --Эlcobbola talk 21:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not wanted anymore Sammy2012 (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting was created in 1959, therefore unsure of copyright and likely not public domain. Also, there is a watermark on it. 67.184.0.138 14:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Has OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davii Lopes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ViktoriaS1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ViktoriaS1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Killarnee as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Fair useGone Postal ( ) 18:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Threshold of originality, example:
  • simple logo (PD-logo/PD-text)
    simple logo (PD-logo/PD-text)
  • poster with background and different colors, copyvio
  • See also w:Talk:The_Faith_of_Graffiti#Infobox --Killarnee (T12) 20:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I know I made a mistake by not labeling this picture correctly. I will have to work on that skill. I hope to upload many important images that are not on the internet, images which add to topics on Wikipedia. I see images which must be copyvio on Wiki and I wonder how the user got around the rule? Anybody have a good page to link me to which describes in good detail how to upload images that might be questionable with concerns to copyvio?EBirzin (talk) 15:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The subject of this photo is located on a private property and its owner phoned me asking for the deletion of this photo. Culex (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The subject of this photo is located on a private property and its owner phoned me asking for the deletion of this photo. Culex (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Its a photo of a rock wall, not something top secret. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The image is a downsized version of Medieval peasant meal.jpg; the textual part does not contain any valuable info that needs to be represented in a form of image. Also, this is not uploader's own work. Side note: almost all files uploaded by the same user are most probably copyright violations. DmitTrix (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The file is highly unlikely to be uploader's own work. I was unable to find the original source, but:

    • the image is watermarked (there is text saying "fito b" in the lower right corner)
    • the image has a relatively low resolution
    • almost all images uploaded by the same user are practically 100% probable have been deleted as copyright violations
    • the only edit done by the uploader to a page that is not created by himself is a vandalism DmitTrix (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Uses Wappenwiki assets. Wappenwiki and its assets are under a non-commercial license which is incompatible with Commons. Thespoondragon (talk) 21:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete per nom. Same case as : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:House_of_Terter_Bulgaria.jpg . Kathisma (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Georgia House of Representatives photos

    [edit]

    Both files have the wrong license and I would like to know the copyright status on these photos. I will withdraw this nomination if they are not copyrighted. Wow (talk) 07:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Procedural listing. This file was tagged for deletion with the same rationale, but never included in the nomination above. ƏXPLICIT 12:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Hollywood movie poster, not CC own work. Kissa21782 (talk) 07:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Also applies to File:Tigresss-of-siberia (cropped).jpg. Not sure if Template:Fair use delete would be applicable here. (The instructions say that it should only be used by sysops.) Kissa21782 (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not educationally useful, nothing identifying enough to categorise. Tangerineduel (talk) 07:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Keep, obviously: A guy with a lanyard that says MIT is in scope. As for «nothing identifying enough to categorise», obviously, trivially false — It’s a 2008 event in Australia, not a 2008 B.C. event in Lemuria — somebody has info. -- Tuválkin 15:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment How come editors who aren’t even self patrolled get to vote on (let alone initiate) DRs? -- Tuválkin 15:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Delete. A MIT lanyard doesn't make this guy all of a sudden notable. Who is he? If not notable, or he can't be identified, then this image serves no educational purpose, hence out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It is not good when an admin needs to be told that notability and even mere identification are not necessary conditions to save a file from deletion. However, we know this: The lanyard tag says he’s P(something) Long, from MIT, and the alternate title of the photo says Phil, and on this other photo of the same set is says Phillip D. Long. At MIT’s website it says that «Phillip D. Long is Senior Strategist for the Academic Computing Enterprise, and Director, Learning Out-reach, for MIT iCampus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.». Good enough? -- Tuválkin 00:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. Notability not established, file not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely own work. No way to find more info as no source was given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Clearly marked (C) Hebrew University of Jerusalem... Closing administrator please review this gallery, many other images appear to be problems. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Did not find this image at source given. It's an architectural rendering, unlikely to be free. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by DESMARAIS (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Historical photos, drawings, book covers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by DESMARAIS (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Wrong licenses. All listed as "self" - all obviously not. Book covers, previously printed images, stamps, photographs, etc.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted work by Heinrich Eberhard (d. 1973), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Der Löschungsantrag ist gegenstandslos; ich betone nochmals, dass ich Rechtsnachfolgerin und direkte Erbin von Dr.Otto Hetzler bin und das lückenlos belegen kann.--92.185.100.214 07:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    [https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Morali&diff=prev&oldid=169673324 The uploader is unclear about the copyright status and the possible authorization TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Hangman'sDeath as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1 without any supporting data. To go to speedy, please provide data as to why you believe it is a copyright violation, don't expect the closing administrator to trace or track the images. Speedy is for clear cut. For others, there is Deletion Nomination. For that I would point out the image is in use, but lacks metadata. It is a large file. The name of the uploader is the same as the subject, so it is possible it is promotional - but that is not a speedy reason. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    https://www.elespanol.com/corazon/famosos/20200430/india-martinez-bichito-ensenando-no/486451979_0.html
    https://www.google.at/search?hl=de-AT&tbs=simg:CAESvgIJiA9XI5EW6KcasgILELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKNca3xrkEuAa2BrmEoQQ0xqDEJAHjDGLMYg8jTGKMYkxjjHaJakxpjEaMFkDIEHf33g3khDGqS88yWSkyx26-ruqLTDryBnJqCgPwp_1ncDb1i596KxKRyzsjyCAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIE7U44PwwLEJ3twQkaqgEKHwoLcGhvdG8gc2hvb3TapYj2AwwKCi9tLzAycWJsMW0KIQoNZmFzaGlvbiBtb2RlbNqliPYDDAoKL20vMDJocXI4NwocCglleWUgbGluZXLapYj2AwsKCS9tLzBmZzAxOQoeCgpleWUgc2hhZG932qWI9gMMCgovbS8wMjV6cDJzCiYKEmV5ZWxhc2ggZXh0ZW5zaW9uc9qliPYDDAoKL20vMDJxOWRkegw&q=india+martinez&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj8hayZ8pXpAhUxtHEKHd5zDUwQsw56BAgNEAE&biw=1920&bih=905
    --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hangman'sDeath: : Your first link is smaller and newer than the one on Commons, your second link leads to a pile of images. Please lay out your issues with this image as in Find an Older & Larger version, or a version with photographer credited, or some clear-cut copyright violation. As it is right now, all those could have been copied from our image, which you have not proven to be a violation. (( Not that I do not think it is possible, but documentation is needed not just opinions. )) Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand your point. However, I reject the idea of we can't proof the opposite so it has to be the uploader's own work. I really assume good faith here, but it just doesn't fit a legit photographer at pro level who contributed his work to Commons.
    The post on [5] seems to be published on 2020-04-30. The same date as the file was uploaded. The author claims to have taken the image earlier. Yet, there is no proof with EXIF data that this is really the case. Twitter is not working for me at the moment, but [6] seems to be taken out of the same batch of images.
    @Indiamartinez: Maybe you can provide some information here. When, where and under what circumstances was this image taken.
    --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    El Español copy is lower-res but showing a larger area, so it cannot be copied from File:INDIA .jpg. We should receive an OTRS release for the image. Platonides (talk) 19:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Uploader did not create award depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: clearly not uploader's own work, as subject of photo died in 1942. Since no provenance is supplied, it is impossible to determine whether photo is actually PD. Absolutely correct! But as I like to look up the historical images, I found from the National Library of Israel https://www.nli.org.il/en/archives/NNL_ARCHIVE_AL002782278/NLI which shows that this image may be derived from that postcard which may date from 1918 to 1935. Thus I am converting to DN for discussion of the early 20th century copyright of Morocco. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Also there is visual material of the back of the card at https://rosetta.nli.org.il/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE12153104&_ga=2.245534476.922996550.1588263313-1174158881.1588263313 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, if you found provenance, that changes everything. DS (talk) 00:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: COM:MOROCCO sets forth a standard term of 70 years pma. As the sources Ellin found speak to publication date, they are, unfortunately, not helpful in assessing a pma term (Morocco uses publication for anonymous works, but anonymous is not the same as "we personally don't know" and thus requires its own evidence/investigation.) As we use 120 years as the threshold to assume author death, a range of 1918 to 1935 is too recent (e.g., in the "best" case: 1918 + 120 = 2038) to support a PD claim. --Эlcobbola talk 18:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://taddlr.com/fr/celebrity/alessandro-del-piero/ Since this is from 1996/97, it's likely PD ({{PD-Italy}}). The only question is crediting the source correctly. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    As long as we credit AllSport UK, we shouldbe fine. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ytoyoda: IMO it's very unlikely that a Getty image is free. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Patrick Rogel: To be clear, it was an Allsport photo whose rights were acquired by Getty Images, and it's likely the photograph was taken by someone else before it was acquired by Allsport. I think it's irrelevant though - if it was published first in Italy, which is likely since this was back in 1996, then it's in the public domain. The owner doesn't matter, the original publication does. Any photograph first published in 1999 or earlier is in the public domain. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ytoyoda: Sorry again but AllSports UK was a British company which licensed their works to various international media and I see no reason why Italian law has to apply since moreover there's no evidence it has been first published in Italy. Theorically Getty, as the purchaser of the catalog, remains the copyright holder. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: COM:L requires works to be free (here, public domain) in both the country of origin and the United States. Even if we assume first publication to be Italy (which, indeed per above, has not been appropriately demonstrated), {{PD-Italy}} itself says, "these are in the public domain in the United States only if: [...] created prior to 1976 and published prior to 1978." This cannot be the case for a 1996/97 work. --Эlcobbola talk 18:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Mastanabal78 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Vintage images, unlikely to be the same person's work. Please explain why public domain in Algeria.

    Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't see mention of any publication and why 1987? Algeria has a 50 years copyright. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I can only repeat what I've read here and on {{PD-Algeria-photo-except}}. M.Bitton (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Where's the evidence of publication? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 03:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    All the photos (except for "Mohand Ameziane Yazourene.jpg" and the other two that I mentioned above) are of people who died in the 1950s. M.Bitton (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It doesn't change nothing. There's no evidence of publication so no evidence of public domain in Algeria. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I only came here to comment on the issue, I have no stake in it. If you think that they should all be deleted, then by all means, delete every single one of them M.Bitton (talk) 00:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: COM:EVID sets forth "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: the file is in the public domain" (underline added) and, per COM:L, description pages should "contain information sufficient for others to verify the license status." "Own work," the sole "source," is entirely inadequate and the images are thus effectively unsourced. That {{PD-Algeria-photo-except}} could apply is possible, but reliant upon knowing date of publication. As we have no date of publication (which is, of course, not the same as mere creation), we have no ability to assess whether that template's date criteria are satisfied. --Эlcobbola talk 20:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    В РФ авторские права произведений, которые созданы авторами на протяжении всей жизни, включающую период ВОВ, охраняются 70+4 года, те 1949+4=с 1953 года произведение в общественном достоянии Dogad75 (talk) 11:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    1) Исключительное право на произведение действует в течение всей жизни автора и семидесяти лет, считая с 1 января года, следующего за годом смерти автора. Исключительное право на произведение, созданное в соавторстве, действует в течение всей жизни автора, пережившего других соавторов, и семидесяти лет, считая с 1 января года, следующего за годом его смерти.

    2) На произведение, обнародованное анонимно или под псевдонимом, срок действия исключительного права истекает через семьдесят лет, считая с 1 января года, следующего за годом его правомерного обнародования. Если в течение указанного срока автор произведения, обнародованного анонимно или под псевдонимом, раскроет свою личность или его личность не будет далее оставлять сомнений, исключительное право будет действовать в течение срока, установленного пунктом 1 настоящей статьи.

    3) Исключительное право на произведение, обнародованное после смерти автора, действует в течение семидесяти лет после обнародования произведения, считая с 1 января года, следующего за годом его обнародования, при условии, что произведение было обнародовано в течение семидесяти лет после смерти автора.

    4) Если автор произведения был репрессирован и посмертно реабилитирован, срок действия исключительного права считается продленным и семьдесят лет исчисляются с 1 января года, следующего за годом реабилитации автора произведения.

    5) Если автор работал во время Великой Отечественной войны или участвовал в ней, срок действия исключительного права, установленный настоящей статьей, увеличивается на четыре года. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 22:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Фотография 1947 года. Надпись на обороте фотоотпечатка "фотография Игорь Горячев (1905-1949)". Автор фотографии умер 71 год назад, следовательно, изображение доступно по лицензии { {PD-old-70} }, которая свидетельствует о нахождении данного произведения в общественном во всех странах.

    Ни каких противоречий с правилами Википедии нет.  Keep Creator-AP (talk) 21:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    It seems to be in the public domain, as per Gone Postal. Vermont (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Данное изображение не является произведением искусства на которое распространяется действие авторского права в России.

    Изображение, в данном случае — боксерская стойка, является техническим фото-документом, сделанным в процессе обучения. Фотографии такого типа делались и делаются тысячами. Ни каких признаков ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЯ ИСКУССТВА в ней нет. Так же как не является произведением искусства техническая инструкция - описание по использованию того или иного прибора, хотя она состоит из слов, а слова складываются в предложения и их кто-то написал. Поскольку авторские права распространяются ТОЛЬКО: "...на произведения науки, литературы и искусства." Creator-AP (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This work is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.
    Creator-AP (talk) 13:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • К сожалению, это фотография, сделанное фотографом, который внёс свой творческий вклад, поэтому защищён авторским правом фотографа. Ни как не тривиальное! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          •  Keep Повторю, еще раз, произведением искусства это изображение не является, следовательно употреблять термин "авторское право" в данном контексте бессмысленно. Creator-AP (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Добавлю, что говорю об этом как человек, имеющий профильную ученую степень, и 30 лет занимающийся вопросами искусства, в т.ч., неизбежно, и правовыми вопросами.Creator-AP (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Позволю вопрос — какой профессиональный опыт в вопросах искусства, в т.ч. экспертных, у вас, что вы столь категорично заявляете обратное?Creator-AP (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
            • Похоже, вы не понимаете авторского права. Это не только искусство или очень творческая работа. Я мог бы быстро нарисовать рыбу со шляпой и он защищена авторским правом. Эта фотография защищена авторским правом. Vermont (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Я по свой профессии непосредственно связан с использованием авторского права и экспертной оценкой.

    Пожалуйста, прочитайте внимательно текст, почему: Данное изображение НЕ ЯВЛЯЕТСЯ произведением искусства на которое распространяется действие авторского права в России. Фотоизображение, в данном случае — боксерская стойка, является техническим фото-документом, сделанным в процессе обучения. Фотографии такого типа делались и делаются тысячами. Ни каких признаков ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЯ ИСКУССТВА в ней нет. Так же как не является произведением искусства техническая инструкция — описание по использованию того или иного прибора, хотя она состоит из слов, а слова складываются в предложения и их кто-то написал.

    http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_64629/5d2874854e8d6f002a2ab6ca07ef78313363ee73 Поскольку авторские права в России распространяются ТОЛЬКО: "...на произведения науки, литературы и искусства."Creator-AP (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

          • Это не говоря о том, что фото-документация была сделана на заказ и за нее были заплачены деньги (7 руб 50 коп). То есть изображенное лицо выступало в качестве работодателя, а выполнявший заказ — в качестве наемного работника. В таком случае, сразу после оплаты, все права переходят к работодателю, в т.ч. авторское право на воспроизведение (если бы оно было).  Keep Creator-AP (talk) 18:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment I want to make sure that something is very clear. It is not the issue of somebody being paid for their work or not. In most cases the photographer retains their copyright even if they are paid. One has to prove the the copyright was transferred for the monetary reward, and not only the physical photograph. I do not see any such proof here. The question is, did the image enter public domain already or do we need to wait anothe 4 years, not who owns the copyright. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 12:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly. And, when unsure, we always assume it is copyrighted; this image should be deleted. Vermont (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Художник или фотограф-художник сохраняет свое авторское право, если продает свою работу, сделанную по собственной инициативе, НО не в результате выполнения этой работы по найму. Авторское право на воспроизведение или тиражирование данного изображения может быть продано отдельно. Вместе с оригиналом работы или впоследствии.

    Если же работа изначально выполнена в результате заказа, то авторское право автоматически передается заказчику при оплате работы. Как было и в данном случае (7 руб. 50 коп. в деньгах 1947 г., о чем есть запись на обороте). Заказная работа - оплата - автоматическая передача авторского права на воспроизведение заказчику - т.е. изображенному на фото-документе лицу.  Keep Creator-AP (talk) 19:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Per the following:

    1. COM:EVID sets forth "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: the file is in the public domain" (underline added) and, per COM:L, description pages should "contain information sufficient for others to verify the license status." This has not been done; the source of "scanned photo" is entirely inadequate and allows us no ability to verify that the date and author information are correct. Creator-AP (one notes the similarity to the uploader, Aleftina AP), tellingly, has added a nonsense template and !voted keep four times (!!!), but not bothered to provide any necessary support.
    2. Even if we assume that the author is indeed Igor Goryachev, who died in 1949, and that there is no 4-year term extension, this would have become PD in Russia on 01.01.2020 (1949 + 70 + 1). This is after the URAA date (01.01.1996), and therefore the United States term would be 95 years from publication. (Per COM:L, works must be free in both the United States and their country of origin.) While we do not have information on publication--again, the lack of required sourcing and evidence is damning and precludes hosting this image--even the assumption of immediate publication upon creation would result in an expiration date of 01.01.2043 (1947 + 95 + 1). --Эlcobbola talk 19:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No evidence of being the work for a federal employee or otherwise free from copyright at source. Merely being held in the Library of Congress does NOT make images or books magically enter public domain. --Animalparty (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No evidence of being the work for a federal employee or otherwise free from copyright at source. Merely being held in the Library of Congress does NOT make images or books magically enter public domain. --Animalparty (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. It's not impossible that this file is freely licensed, given that it was published on nih.gov... not obvious enough to speedily delete. Storkk (talk) 09:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    As it's nih.gov, they don't really bother about copyrights, they get authors copy of articles, which are preprints and put up on this portal. But copyrights of journal articles are different for each journals and authors. So some expert from the field would be able to decipher that. Not everything on nih.gov is free for sure, In fact most of it is not free. thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by ComputerHotline as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FoP in France
    Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion whether the depicted "UFO" has any copyrightable originality. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    One of the images in this collage, bottom center, is not credited. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    With all the due respect, I guess if we inspect the many similar tower pictures at Category:Salé we will suddenly find a view like in File:Salé mosquée.jpg from where this image could have been carved out and maybe polished a bit. Frankly I tried to do this tedious search but my patience is limited. If the search is futile, can some good samaritan change/save the collage before it disappears? --E4024 (talk) 00:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    E4024: I couldn't find it either. That's the point of the nomination. However, since all the others are credited, perhaps a different image could be pasted in that spot, uploaded and I could then amend my nomination to only the old version. Would that work for you? Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Dear Ellin, I do not even know how to crop a file. I asked a colleague to crop for me (separate the couple where there is a scissors sign :) something and most possibly they thought I was joking and did not even reply. I cannot do anything technical on the computer; I only write with two fingers. I hope someone younger takes the initiative. It's a pity to lose this beautiful collage. E4024 (talk) 00:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    E4024: You pick it, I'll stick it. Be sure to poke me with your choice. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Dear Ellin, this looks like a monument missing there, although it's a horizontal image. I will add another for you to decide more easily. E4024 (talk) 23:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Or File:Salé mosquée.jpg. Many thanks. E4024 (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I have fixed the image.  I withdraw my nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: Withdrawn. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Is it really simple logo? Does not look like textlogo, in my opinion not made of simple geometrical figures. OTRS-permission from company representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Michael Ritter 1946 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Unsourced, licensed as "own work" when clearly not. This gallery contains interesting works which are probably of good educational value, but with no sources, and completely incorrect licenses, we cannot host the images. COM:EVID says that source & license is the job of the uploader. This nomination includes historical images, maps, awards, medals, paintings and collages. Unfortunate that there is so little information provided in the file upload templates.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I can give an origin for the image of General John Le Marchant. It is the frontispiece of Memoirs of the Late Major-General Le Marchant written by his son Dennis Le Marchant. It was published in London in 1841. The artist was JD Harding and the etching was published by C Hullmandel. The information I have just given and the date of publication should provide enough grounds for its retention with a modified description. Urselius (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you Urselius, I fixed that file's template and struck it out above. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, the File:El Báltico superior bajo dominación sueca 1580-1721.png is a traslation of this File:Sw BalticProv en.png, the main file and source. Thanks. --Milenioscuro (talk) 03:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted/Kept: Deleted most of the nominated files, Kept those which were fixed by me or others. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    There are SVG versions on File:Suffix tree for cbcbba.svg and File:Suffix automaton for abbcbc.svg Adamant.pwn (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Ok, it also has joint SVG version now. Adamant.pwn (talk) 22:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Delfort as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio from http://www.unior.it/ This is not a CC file
    Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. As this university was founded in 1732, the logo might well be in the public domain already. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you @Túrelio: . This file is a registered trademark. On UIBM you can find it with registration number 0001539717, owner: UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI L'ORIENTALE. -Delfort (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure. But trademark-protection does not equal copyright. We have quite some logos or other images, which are trademarked. I've added the trademarked-template for the image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: no permission. --Krd 17:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]