Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/03/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 21st, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

カテゴリでなく、単なるページを作成してしまったからです。 先従隗始 (talk) 01:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio per COM:CSD G7. pandakekok9 10:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I just dont wont it. 184.20.38.87 06:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Affanso Lloyd Anglin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Gvucelich (talk) 15:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request via Android app. --Achim (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Did not mean to leave redirect behind after move The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:34, 21 März 2020 UTC: CSD G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content): Did not mean to leave redirect behind after move --Krdbot 20:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted by 1989 as Speedy F1. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

False claim of CC-BY (as with all of this user's uploads). Unlike the other uploads, most of which led back to non-free images on English Wikipedia, for this image I found a similar free version on Commons, File:Yuri_Andropov_-_Soviet_Life,_August_1983.jpg, so it's possible that this can be kept, though it would need a correct license and better source. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vuongtrang2601199513 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coppivo https://3akkorda.net/artist/konstantin-kuza-uo-rabinov/ 82.208.115.250 19:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by De728631 at 22:29, 23 März 2020 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tsyganyata'03.jpg: coppivo https://3akkorda.net/artist/konstantin-kuza-uo-rabinov/ --Krdbot 02:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of an organization, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 02:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 03:44, 24 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 08:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuncungestareiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#G10

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexeypages (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, personal images.

Дима Г (talk) 03:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NikaMilovanova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, personal images.

Дима Г (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neelgpatil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo of unknown man. Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 00:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

removed speedy delete in exchange for regular delete. Quakewoody (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: falls within the project scope; in use in Wikidata. --Ahmadtalk 18:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request. No longer needed - FlightTime (open channel) 03:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to {{U1}} Sorry :P - FlightTime (open channel) 03:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio; but the right criterion was probably G7, not U1. That being said, because the file was older than one week, I think DR was needed. --Ahmadtalk 18:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation  A l p h a m a  Talk 08:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Sealle. --Ahmadtalk 18:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and flags. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal photo. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 02:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This photo might have some potential use (woman in shirt with the word "Love" on the back looking towards a window with closed blinds), but the copyright is unclear. Google translates the Russian description as "Photo Source: vk.com", the author is "Олеся Семёнова", and I don't see evidence of release under a free license. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request — Personal Privacy Concerns
-Vastmine1029 (talk) 03:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged {{SD|1=G7}} for uploader. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7 wasn't applicable, the upload is too old for that, but unused personal picture. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (extremely blurry), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (very blurry), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (very blurry), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (just some blurry shapes, strange angle), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (just some blurry shapes, strange angle), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (just some blurry shapes, strange angle), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (just some blurry shapes, strange angle), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (just some blurry shapes, strange angle), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (just some blurry shapes, strange angle), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete read the contents, spammy. — regards, Revi 15:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Promotional text. Out of scope. – Kwj2772 (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry,The file is missing evidence of permission. 人人生來平等 (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (just some blurry shapes, strange angle), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (strangely angled random-seeming shot without clear subject), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Ferdinando Chevrier (d. 2005), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (strangely angled random-seeming shot without clear subject), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (strangely angled random-seeming shot without clear subject), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gualtiero Nativi (d. 1999), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough, but quality is too low (strangely angled random-seeming shot without clear subject), so not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: https://www.young-classic.eu/cache/images/4463.jpg Rennrigor (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ryzhykov Andrey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Nikolay Volynets, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per ticket:2020032210000791. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Billboards are the main focus of the picture, COM:DW of non-free works. Ahmadtalk 23:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 14:29, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a poster. The poster is the main focus of the photo (the reason for taking it). It's a poster, encouraging people to stay home because of the coronavirus pandemic in Iran. Ahmadtalk 23:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 14:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images, no permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat talk ] 11:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat talk ] 11:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sai Krishna Kanakala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gallery of images stated to be own work, but with only 1 image containing camera metadata, and several others showing reasons to believe they are derivative works, copied from Facebook, and so on. Also some packaging, and what looks to be a drone shot or two and an architectural model.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Taipei. Solomon203 (talk) 03:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out-of-scope image. Turaids (talk) 12:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミングなしで投稿しましたので 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 01:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested deletion of unused own fire. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no clear indication that the uploader has the right to licence the image, and the stylized geographical outlines might be copyrighted. PS and note to self: If this is kept en:File:AtlanticCollegelogo.jpg should probably be nominated for deletion instead. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted by someone else. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Needs a discussion of de minimis or blurring the offending images. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There's no indoor FoP in China, and the statue and the drawings are all copyrighted. -- 13:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There is FOP in China for artistic, architectural, or applied artwork, which means the sculpture and paintings are not copyrightable. Regarding indoors, article 22 says that "a work in its collections by a library, archive, memorial hall, museum, art gallery or similar institution" may be reproduced and "exploited without the permission from, and without payment of remuneration to, the copyright owner". --pandakekok9 13:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Pandakekok9. I would not have uploaded this image if I hadn't thought it was acceptable for Commons. Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per FOPChina. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:04, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:04, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:04, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Imanushkasingh (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I disagree, but user requested deletion of own file. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coppivo coppivo 82.208.115.250 19:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be copyrighted by dutch news agency ANP. Already published in higher resolution here in 2014. --Mirer (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.30.237.243 19:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted map in Tainan. Solomon203 (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted map in Tainan. Solomon203 (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a bad svg (traced). The file is no more intergrated on any article. The correct files are File:DEU Zeven COA.svg and File:DEU SG Zeven COA.svg (look at the sources there) --Jürgen Krause (talk) 16:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteMaxxL - talk 16:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Fränsmer (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's the reason for such a long time, to get a decision? --Jürgen Krause (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be cropped from postage stamp. As stated in another nomination " Cropping out artistic parts of postal covers and stamps is strictly prohibited by PD-RU-exempt (read the footnotes about cropping). These artistic renderings by themselves are protected by copyright until expiration, and none are old enough to have expired copyright yet. Until such time, the artists of these works, like Pyotr Bendel and Anatoly Kalashnikov, retain the rights to these works." Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's unlikely that the uploader created the medal depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 03:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as {{Fair use}}, but this image may be ineligible for copyright. 05:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There may be FOP in Nigeria, but that only applies to "any artistic work permanently situated in a place where it can be viewed by the public". The Christmas light show here is not permanent. This is a derivative of a non-free work. pandakekok9 06:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad adel007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Provide evidence of publication before 1987.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All files listed above is proven to be photographed before 1987 which means that it is copyrights expired in Egypt and is proven to be photographed before 1981 which means that it is copyrights has expired in USA. Otherwise kindly read carefully every photo description and permission statement as most of this photos belongs to characters died before 1981, So the photo is proven to be been taken before that date. Please undo the deletion requests and wait for separate discussion for every photo regarding dates if you want.--Muhammad adel007 (talk) 08:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Muhammad adel007: That's not what I ask to you: we need evidence of publication before 1987 (like in almost every country it's the publication date which starts the copyright countdown, not the shooting date and Egypt is no exception). Please make your remarks after each file listed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually do what ever you want. I have already reviewed all of the photos once when i uploaded it and a second time when you nominated it for deletion.

I don't have the time for a third revision. You are making this an impossible mission even after i added explanation for every photo even for my own work and extracted photos from already published photos on commons. I think a third opinion needed here. But if you decided to delete all of my work, I don't think this will encourage me to contribute any more on commons.Muhammad adel007 (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's an Administrator who will review these pictures, not me. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probably under copyright in Egypt -- no evidence that they were published more than 50 years ago -- creation date is irrelevant. Certainly copyrighted in the USA due to URAA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad adel007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who are the painters? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - probably PD in Egypt, but not in the USA due to URAA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad adel007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader removes the deletion template.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad adel007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader has created a new template {{PD-Egypt-Public Personalities}} though I think it's about personality rights and not copyright. These images appeared on third-party copyrighted websites but the uploader claims "the newspaper website got the photo from a governmental source" and then thinks they are public domain. It's very unlikely since {{PD-Egypt-official}} is not about photographies. IMO a direct link to a government website is needed for verification.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above mentioned files was published under Article 178 of Intellectual Property Law 82 of 2002: which cleared that public personalities pictures may be published without the authorization of the person whose picture was taken OR the authorization of the author of the picture only of it does not cause prejudice to the honour, reputation or dignity of that person.

This is the statement from Article 178 of Egyptian Intellectual Property Law 82 of 2002:

The person who makes a picture may not publish, exhibit or distribute the original or copies of that picture without the authorization of the person or persons whose picture was taken, unless otherwise agreed. However, such a picture may be published if it concerned public events, official or public personalities, or persons of local or worldwide renown; or if the publication was authorized by public authorities in the public interest, provided that such exhibition or circulation of that picture shall not cause prejudice to the honour, reputation or dignity of that person. The person whose picture was taken may authorize the publication of the picture in newspapers and other similar publications, even without the authorization of the author of the picture, unless otherwise agreed. The preceding provisions shall apply whatever the process used for making the picture, such as by drawing, engraving or any other process..--Muhammad adel007 (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's personality rights. Besides you are neither "the person whose picture was taken" nor "the author of the picture" so it doesn't concern you. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- The above mentioned photos represents personal photos for public personalities it's very clear it is not a free shot for a newspaper. - The newspaper or website is not the author, they published the photos according to Article 178 The person whose picture was taken may authorize the publication of the picture in newspapers and other similar publications even without the authorization of the author of the picture. So the approval of the person whose picture was taken is granted for newspapers and other similar publications by the first publishing, the person does not have to grant permission for each newspaper separately according to Articlr 178.Muhammad adel007 (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - The laws quoted have nothing to do with copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

I do not agree with the speedy removal. This other material of a judicial nature, because made after his arrest by the secret police. Kolchak1923 (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Old and repeatedly discussed mistake. This image is official in commons sense, but it's not official in the terms of copyright law. This is not offical sign - it's specification is clear enough. This is not official doc (in the terms of copyright law) - it is not part of law, other legal text, judicial decision, and has not got legislative, administrative and judicial character. And also - this is material has not got judicial nature - only docs from court itself have got judicial nature, other docs which can was/be discussed at court have not got judicial character. Alex Spade (talk) 12:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • This photograph was taken on behalf of the state, on behalf of the state in criminal proceedings (administrative or judicial nature is present). It appears in the questionnaire had been arrested in the investigation file, koltoroe considered by the court. Archive (Центральный архив ФСБ РФ. Следственное дело Н-18765 в отношении Семенова Г.М., Родзаевского К.В. и др.), which is free to work her issues and it was published several times. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 11:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • No. The state creates many, many works, but not all of them are uncopyrighted. Criminal proceeding has not got judicial nature. As I said, only docs from court itself had got judicial nature (plz, read for example Комментарий к ГК РФ. М.: Кодекс, 2007, первый абзац на стр. 128). In this case judicial nature is судебных характер in Russian, not юридический характер in Russian. In addition, criminal proceeding has not got judicial nature as whole, it is not edict, order, direction, etc. These docs are example of administrative docs. Some parts of criminal proceeding can be uncopyrighted (for example, arrest warrant, search warrant), but not all of them.
      In addition, freedom must be proved, not vice versa. So, plz give us jurisprudent commentaries or court decisions in Russia, where mug shots descibed as part of {{PD-RU-exempt}}. I never saw them: I only know some commentaries (not court decisions), where mug shots (and shots for passports and similar docs) descibed as possible part of {{PD-trivial}}, but they are not suitable for us - in US-law such work are enough untrivial. Alex Spade (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • All right. Let this image will be no judicial, and materials administrative character. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 05:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC) Who owns the copyright? --Kolchak1923 (talk) 05:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • Bingo. "Who owns the copyright?" is a no-no question here. No one has to answer it; it's the keep party that must prove their point. NVO (talk) 06:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
          • I believe that a State which does not protect a copyrighted image. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 07:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
            • Your belief is nothing for this case. {{PD-RU-exempt}} is extremely different from {{PD-USGov}}. As I said, the ru-State creates many, many works. According to ru-law copyright-holder (including State or more exactly its specific agency) isn't obliged to indicate which its work is copyrighted. The specific agency (or control agencies) could close their eyes in relation to the wide spreading of some material from them without its/their permission, but such silence action is not reason to declare, that respecive material is un-copyrighted. Is this photowork used in history-scientific works and in press? It is nothing for us. They don't need permission from agency, they just use Russian analog of fairuse (article 1274 - free use for scientific, educational and informational purposes). Alex Spade (talk) 15:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I believe that the image passed into public domain Jan. 1, 1997 (before introduction of the new law January 1, 2008, increased term of copyright from 50 to 70 years over 11 years). --Kolchak1923 (talk) 02:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • And again, your belief is nothing. Civil Code of RF from January 1, 2008 has got retroaction for time of protection, except for images which were {{PD-old-50}} before January 1, 1993 (this fact is clearly pointed in case 2 of {{PD-Russia-2008}} and paragraph 1 of article 6 of Law No. 231-FZ of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2006; the Implementation Act for Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). Alex Spade (talk) 14:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 12:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be re-uploaded after deletion. VLu (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD in Russia but not in the USA due to URAA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, bad quality pandakekok9 11:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Carrotflower as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request. I am the original uploader of voy:File:Oaklandbanner1.jpg which was transferred from Wikivoyage to Commons in violation of Wikivoyage policy stating that banners are to be hosted locally, see voy:Wikivoyage:Destination of the month candidates/Banners. The file has been 6½ years in Commons, so the file deserves regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: poor quality. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Calips (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in France, artists' permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough. I have processed several of this uploader's recent deletion requests and deleted images because the quality was too low - extremely blurry and/or random angle of pictures that looked as if the shutter button was pressed inadvertently without distinguishable subject, so unusable. But this particular one is a bit better; blurry too, but not that extreme. So I'm asking for a second opinion. Gestumblindi (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: poor quality. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Upload was in May 2019, so "author requests deletion" alone isn't enough. I have processed several of this uploader's recent deletion requests and deleted images because the quality was too low - extremely blurry and/or random angle of pictures that looked as if the shutter button was pressed inadvertently without distinguishable subject, so unusable. But this particular one is a bit better; blurry too, but not that extreme. So I'm asking for a second opinion. Gestumblindi (talk) 15:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Anyway no COM:FOP in Italy, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Lido Bettarini (d. 2019), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Dino Caponi (d. 2000), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Dario de Blanck y Menocal (d. 2013), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not been used. Pitambar Bhattarai (talk) 12:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arenavittorio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work. Artist's or his heir's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted text (Mao Zedong 《七绝·为李进同志题所摄庐山仙人洞照》). 12:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is a photo of a calligraphic artwork in an outdoor public place so yes. --Wcam (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Chinese FoP does not include text, so while it is, of course, calligraphic, it is also copyrighted words. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still from un unfree video. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 21:28, 27 April 2020 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Muhammad adel007 --Krdbot 00:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - scans of publications, primarily newspapers and book covers

Эlcobbola talk 15:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST - unused, poor quality (e.g., blurry - File:Сергій Мартинюк і Григорій Осовий, Будинок ФПУ, Майдан Незалежності 2, Київ, березень 2020.jpg) images of non-notable persons (see, especially, File:Сергій Мартинюк і Марина Мартинюк, м.Ірпінь 19.03.20р. Просто Щасливі і Вам Щастя.jpg and File:Мартинюки, м.Ірпінь 19.03.20р. Просто Щасливі і Вам Щастя.jpg and related descriptions)-no apparent educational value.

Эlcobbola talk 15:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:idw|File:Сергій Мартинюк і Григорій Осовий, Будинок ФПУ, Майдан Незалежності 2, Київ, березень 2020.jpg]] [[Category:---- Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Мартинюк Сергій

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused, poor quality (e.g., blurry - File:Сергій Мартинюк і Григорій Осовий, Будинок ФПУ, Майдан Незалежності 2, Київ, березень 2020.jpg) images of non-notable persons (see, especially, File:Сергій Мартинюк і Марина Мартинюк, м.Ірпінь 19.03.20р. Просто Щасливі і Вам Щастя.jpg and File:Мартинюки, м.Ірпінь 19.03.20р. Просто Щасливі і Вам Щастя.jpg and related descriptions)-no apparent educational value. Мартинюк Сергій [[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=Files uploaded by Мартинюк Сергій]]

(talk) 21:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)]][reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this logo really too simple to be copyrighted? It's from the United Kingdom, where the threshold of originality is quite low. PS and note to self: If this is actually kept en:File:Cardiff and Vale University Health Board logo.svg needs to be nominated for deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is marked as copyrighted. Karitxa (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Most of our files are copyrighted, but are freely licensed. In this case, the watermark names the uploader. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 23:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of deleted image and unclear copyright status. Uploader had stated in 2015 "I talked with the Caldera Family, and they granted to share it as main photo for the article about Rafael Caldera. Is not an official portrait.", reposted it 2016 by staying it's a work by "Oficina Central de Información de Venezuela", so official and says today both "Retrato de Rafael Caldera en la residencia presidencial La Casona el día de su juramentación vomo Presidente de Venezuela en su primer periodo" so likely official and from Archivo Rafael Caldera (under CC-BY-SA). So 2 possibilities :

Hi @Patrick Rogel, this file and its copyright belongs to the Caldera Pietri family. The original was digitalized just to be uploaded to the Internet and is part of the process of digitalizing Rafael Caldera's archive. I don't know if, for better understanding, talk to the Caldera Pietri family, to one of their representatives and send an email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venlur (talk • contribs)
@Venlur: Why have you recreated it? Indeed it will be usefull to ask them if they really own some pictures you have already uploaded... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Patrick Rogel, This is a project that I have been working on for more than four years to create the first digital presidential library in Venezuela. This photo was one of the first items I digitized with the Caldera Pietri family. It is a private photo, which was not circulated in the media, at the gala dinner after he was sworn in as president for the first time.

Unfortunately I uploaded it before I had a better understanding of the Wikimedia.

For this project a whole photographic archive has been digitized and we are uploading images of which Rafael Caldera, and now his family, holds the rights.

Hi @Patrick Rogel, an email was sent with the permission for this image by the Fundación Tomás Liscano / Biblioteca Presidencial Rafael Caldera (Caldera-Pietri family).


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- OTRS accepted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use). The uploader is 88-year-old w:Al Garvey who created the flyer himself decades ago, and then scanned it recently for Commons. I walked him through the uploading process today, and I can assure you everything is in order. Binksternet (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Al Garvey (posting as Alybarbara on Commons) certainly has the right to offer his own work freely to the public domain, which he did earlier today by uploading it under the correct license. Binksternet (talk) 01:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, fair use is not allowed on Commons. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 02:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What makes you think this image is copyrighted? Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sadat-Octoper-War Staff.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is licensed CC-BY-NC-SA. https://github.com/vuejs/art/ Amir (talk) 23:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ladsgroup: Hey! :) The license has changed in 2019-12, [1]. I'll update the links to reflect the original licensed version… –Simon04 (talk) 06:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheBellaTwins1445 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See COM:PACKAGING

Elisfkc (talk) 00:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheBellaTwins1445 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be fan art, but it looks as to be a drawing of art already published online (examples: [2], [3], [4]). I am the OTRS agent handling this case under Ticket:2020031610000122, but cannot make a determination as to its copyright status.

Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 18:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude but this is my drawing my fan-art drawing a drawing I made myself taking inspiration from the subject, obviously I needed an image to take note on how I needed to draw him. We need to keep my images as well because the Kemonito page has none images and actually there are any free files of Kemonito on the internet, please we need to kept them. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 15:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please once again, I beg you to leave my drawing, it is the only CC file for him thus I didnt mean to use copyright or something it is a drawing I made myself based on an image of him, pleaseee. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 04:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@TheBellaTwins1445: Sorry, but this Commons doesn't care if an English Wikipedia article needs a photo, this is a separate project with different rules. This work might be Fan Art, but I feel like this is more a derivative work. You might own the copyright on the drawing, but using the drawing to illustrate Kemonito is not allowed. To put it another way, if I make a drawing of Mickey Mouse, I may own the copyright to said drawing, but if the drawing I make is based on en:File:Mickey Mouse.png, Disney would have a slam dunk case if I tried to use it as Mickey without their permission. I'd say  Delete these files. Elisfkc (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete All these files are out of scope, the biography of the person deserves a better illustration. Taichi (talk) 06:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, There is no other file we can use for Kemonito in commons at the moment, and actually why cant this be kept? the image here, which is also in disussion - commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:George Floyd mural Mauerpark Berlin its under the same cirmstances and it looks it will be kept even thought is the same stuff as my draw here, its a derivated work, it isnt fair we cant keep it. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although these photos are published under a CC license on Flickr by Gibson Lounge, the copyright belongs to Getty Images.

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:53, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ytoyoda, Nevermind, if they have to go they have to, please delete them as fast as you can, I uploaded them because they were CC on flickr, go ahead. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 04:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted. First set violates our fan art policy. George Floyd images were kept due to freedom of panorama in Germany – freedom of panorama isn't applicable here. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request. This picture was not supposed to be uploaded. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 07:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 15:38, 22 Juni 2020 UTC: Uploader request. This picture was not supposed to be uploaded. --Krdbot 00:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 08:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is already a SVG version of this file before this one was uploaded + this file is outdated 🆂🅐🅳🅘🆀🅤🅸 11:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE and regularly updated. --ƏXPLICIT 03:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is already a SVG version of this file before this one was uploaded + this file is outdated 🆂🅐🅳🅘🆀🅤🅸 11:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE and regularly updated. --ƏXPLICIT 03:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSS error and not been used Pitambar Bhattarai (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, presumably due to the incredible blurriness. --ƏXPLICIT 03:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: EXIF data credits "Nassos Triantafyllou", no permission. --ƏXPLICIT 03:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

really poor quality, unidentified (and unidentifiable) location, for general purpose there is a plenty of photos in Category:Fog — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same logo in different language was recently deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fremskrittspartiet.svg 4ing (talk) 19:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coppivo copivo 82.208.115.250 19:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At least published under a higher resolution here. --Mirer (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 03:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coppivo coppivo 82.208.115.250 19:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: watermarked, no permission. --ƏXPLICIT 03:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coppivo coppivo 82.208.115.250 19:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't have much experience with logos, but maybe "trademark" or "pd-textlogo" apply here. --Mirer (talk) 20:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --ƏXPLICIT 03:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.liveinternet.ru/users/kakula/post443854684 OTRS 82.208.115.250 19:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That one has a lower resolution than the one uploaded here. But the uploader uses another name as creator than in his other files and all are marked as own work.
Maybe a screenshot of this old Youtube video?[5] --Mirer (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer may release his work under a CC licence, but he cannot dispose of the copyright of the painter. Bujo (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I doubt that the painting was released under a CC licence. --Bujo (talk) 13:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative work, artist's permission required. --ƏXPLICIT 03:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer may release *his* work under a CC licence, but he cannot dispose of the copyright of the painter. The painting is in the focus of the image and clearly not de minimis. Bujo (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative work, artist's permission required. --ƏXPLICIT 03:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private photo q Hjart (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Speedy1661 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://www.hockeyfans.ch/spieler/detail/marc_leuenberger

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: professional portraits, COM:OTRS permission required. --ƏXPLICIT 03:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング無で投稿しましたので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 06:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, replaced by File:Harajuku Station 200321a2.jpg. --ƏXPLICIT 05:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont need Tareqctg (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 05:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that Shane Bevel Photography www.shanebevel.com has released the image as claimed 81.174.135.227 14:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the work of the uploader and no evidence that the image has been released as claimed 81.174.135.227 15:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the work of uploader and noi evidence that image has been released as claimed 81.174.135.227 15:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this has been released as claimed 81.174.135.227 15:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this has been released as claimed 81.174.135.227 15:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2020 Tulsa Airport . All Rights Reserved. No evidence of release as claimed 81.174.135.227 15:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2020 Tulsa Airport . All Rights Reserved. no evidence it has been released as claimed 81.174.135.227 15:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of release as claimed 81.174.135.227 15:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in USA; label text & illustration is © Wyoming State, not US Federal, so not copyright-free. MPF (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris Light: - any joy yet? - MPF (talk) 12:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Response delayed due to the pandemic:

Dan Bach Thu, Apr 2, 2:02 PM Hi Chris, Just wanted to drop you a line and let you know I'm still waiting to hear back from my boss and that I haven't forgotten about you. Dan Dan Bach, MA,

Christopher Light <churchlight@gmail.com> Thu, Apr 2, 3:44 PM to Dan

No worries, thanks for the update! I expect delays, we're (Indiana) are all in self quarantine. Chris --Chris Light (talk) 18:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please contact COM:OTRS when the autorization arrives. Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alybarbara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mostly vintage images: not the same person work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alybarbara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Albert Garvey , artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all. My old friends Al and Barbara Garvey just uploaded all of these photographs today. It took me a while to talk them through it because they are in their 80s. I've known them since about 1997 or '98. All of the photos belong to them, all of the images are their work. Binksternet (talk) 01:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Binksternet: Then you are not allowed to claim "own work" if it is not. Second there is only one photographer and not two, obviously and contrary to what you are stating now ("all of the images are their work") neither Al or Barbara are the authors of the pictures where they are pictured in so please attribute each photo with the actual name of the photographer(s). Third please have separately Albert Garvey sending a permission for his two paintings via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alybarbara (Al and Barbara Garvey) are claiming that these photos and prints and paintings are their own work, yes, including the ones that they paid for, such that the Garveys now own the resulting photos. If they own the images then they are allowed to freely upload them to Commons, giving them to the public domain. If you think the name of a work-for-hire photographer should be listed, for instance in the various studio portraits, that's not a deletion issue. Binksternet (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And Al Garvey doesn't have to send anything to OTRS to give his permission because he just uploaded them himself today giving permission in the process. He already gave permission as a part of uploading. Binksternet (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
However it's like that we work here: we can't verify indentity on-wiki so OTRS is the only way. For the pictures which are works for hire (another change on the previous claim that "all of the images are their work") and as requested please attribute images with the name of the actual photographer(s) in the file descriptions and ask your friends to go through OTRS with the transferts of ownership from the photographer(s) to them enclosed. By the way please don't forget to notify me by using @Patrick Rogel: when you are talking about me: it's just more polite. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC) PS: and please forget this Wikipedia word "deletionnist": it's not Wikipedia here but Commons and since its main goal is to host free media only so don't be surprised if Commonists' main job is to track copyright violations, a job for which they're praised. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 02:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For God's sake, Rogel, you have no idea how difficult it was to arrange with my 88-year-old friend to scan a bunch of his images and upload them to Commons. It took 27 days for us to coordinate a simple uploading session. w:Al Garvey already identified himself when he created his username with his yahoo.com email address and password. It's all done already – nothing further is required. Binksternet (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's always hard for everybody when we are dealing with vintage images because uploaders have to search for the often forgotten photographers' names. Nevertheless I can ensure you some users do it perfectly well and their files are not deleted. But if you don't wish to convince them to go thru OTRS for sure their files will be deleted. Please note too in case they change their mind that Google Yahoo or Gmail accounts are generally not accepted by OTRS members. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The paintings are not copyrighted. You have based your nomination of them on a false claim. Binksternet (talk) 03:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't use bold characters; it's considered like shouting here. On the contrary I've said the paintings were copyrighted, as each creation made by an human. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Each creation made by an human"? That's idiotic. The paintings are not now and have never been copyrighted. I was using bold for emphasis because my argument undermines yours in a foundational manner. Binksternet (talk) 14:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about: OTRS not accepting Google and gmail for email adresses? I already said that Alybarbara has a yahoo email address. You are muddying the waters here.
Yahoo or Gmail emails are not accepted, ask OTRS, they will confirm it to you. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the photographs, you have nominated them for deletion outside of the scope of our Commons:Deletion policy. Nothing at that policy page says that work-for-hire photographers must be named, for instance the employee of a photography studio hired to shoot a session of photos, all the resulting photos being owned by the person who hired the studio. Nothing in the policy talks about that. Binksternet (talk) 03:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Everything must be accurately named in the file description page and it's time to modify it. Since it seems you are not familiar with Commons rules so I suggest you to re-read the help links on the top of your user page. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Addentum: "Everything must be accurately named": "Editors should do their best to document the files they upload, and material may be deleted if the documentation is incorrect or inadequate." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you tell me what you think is "incorrect or inadequate" about each one of the files that Al Garvey uploaded? Each one individually. Instead of nominating the whole pile for deletion, with a vague hand-waving about how they are vintage photos, or how uncopyrighted paintings need to have OTRS intervention. Binksternet (talk) 04:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Everything" is too wide a scope. You have an unique take on the requirements, and it's an unnecessary barrier to inclusion. You have repeatedly interposed your views between good faith uploaders and Commons; this is just another in a long series. Your behavior should be examined by the community. Binksternet (talk) 14:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo everyone. Binksternet and Patrick Rogel. Pardon my lateness, I have been and still am not feeling well. In truth, Binks, Patrick is right here - by the rules of Commons.

  • There is no fair use COM:FAIRUSE, and the works above appear to be from many photographers, each one needs to have it's particular license figured out to keep it.
  • That's up to the uploader, please see COM:EVID.
  • Personally I would start on the list at COM:HIRTLE which seems to me in my current foggy state to be perhaps the best explanation of how to find the right license for each image. Since they were created by different people at different times - some of them may be able to be kept easily.
  • If not there's always asking the photographer to release it via the very simple form at COM:OTRS. Since everyone - including me - seems to be stuck at home, this would be a great time to reach out and get the actual stories and photographers' names on these images in the hopes of being able to keep some or maybe if everything falls into place all of them. As for work-for-hire, or this one that one above... this is only a tiny bit of historical research that's being asked. I think the term "deletion" somehow brings up a giant monster of evil doom. It's not. In truth, even when I hit "delete," the image is not removed - merely hidden. So if each of these were to vanish, and later you found out we could keep one, or more - they can be restored. It's cool. Be at peace, this is a historical research project and a fun time, not any kind of judgment on you or anyone else as an individual. If they bought all the photos, a simple email to COM:OTRS (as linked above) will get them in touch with one of the specialized copyright folks. I believe there are ways that you can work with your elderly friends, and also with the OTRS folks... but I am not an OTRS editor - which is a specialized and beloved skill - so please, be at peace with the process. We'd like to keep every picture possible here. Help us out!! Best wishes, I hope to be back more soon. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you get well soon!
I have contacted Al Garvey (Alybarbara) with a request to send the proper image information to OTRS. Binksternet (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An explanatory email has been sent to OTRS by Alybarbara. Let's see what they decide. Binksternet (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Binksternet, any update? -mattbuck (Talk) 20:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have not seen any update. Binksternet (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 23:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in USA; label text & illustration is © Wyoming State, not US Federal, so not copyright-free. MPF (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 06:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this redirect. (not the file) I requested deletion before, but these requests somehow went unanswered. See also Commons:Village pump/Archive/2020/03#Unofficial logos.

According to [6] the redirect is used on a user page on enwiki (this is incorrect, it's not used there, bug maybe), one user page on ruwiki (they don't allow other users or CommonsDelinker to replace it, I left a message on their talk page). It was also re-added to zhwiki through the use of undo [7] but I have updated the filename there so it no longer uses this redirect.

The reason why this redirect should be deleted is the same as the reason for moving the file: to avoid misleading (re-)users. This is an unofficial logo variant.

Pinging @Themightyquill, Srittau - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Confused:
  1. It is a useful redirection. This file is not only used in several user pages, but also in templates, and as a link (example), in numerous pages. Deleting this file will just create mess, like unnecessary red links. Now the path is explicit, please keep it as it is.
  2. The fact that this is an "unofficial variant" is not a reason to delete it. We may need this derivative work specifically. Proof with the target, currently used by thousands of users. The description clearly says "This version is made for use in English Wikipedia's WikiProjects and userboxes to represent Windows in general".
  3. We host Unofficial Olympic logos, Unofficial Apple logos, Unofficial Facebook logos, Parodies of logos, etc. If this file is an "unofficial Windows logo", then it is just sorted in the ✓[OK] right category. And can be used as such.
  4. For who has a doubt that Microsoft used this logo in the past, here is a reminder. Then yes, it is actually an official logo. To be exact, the true colors are here: microsoft.com, but these are extremely similar. And the basic appearance is faithful in my opinion. See Category:Mona Lisa for an overview of the many variations of colors we can host here for a single painting. One thing is sure, the purpose of the original upload (target of this redirection) was to represent Windows. These userboxes are useful. Thus I disagree deleting this link will "avoid misleading (re-)users". On the contrary, those who put these userboxes on their userpages certainly do it on purpose.
  5. Template {{Trademarked}} is here, since the beginning. "If you want to use it, you have to ensure that you have the legal right". Doesn't mean "never use this file, alert it's a fake!" -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ⚠️ the target is labeled {{PD-textlogo}}. This is a very common practice for professional designers to create monochrome and plain color alternative versions, when elaborating a logo, to adapt to the very numerous techniques of color printing (like serigraphy for example, where gradients are rarely allowed), in anticipation of need of the main company. Thus it is absolutely obvious that Microsoft has an official "plain color version" of this kind in their technical archives -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • First of all, Commons:Canvassing is just an essay on Commons. Secondly, what I did was correct. I did not "grant" any "demand"s. As a tech-savvy user, I have enough "expertise" to be called into such discussions, just as many users ping me about discussions related to the Persian language (my another area of expertise)[9]. I just participated in some DRs as an independent user when they were brought to my attention. I could have voted {{Keep}} if your rationale was strong enough (which was not). The status of Alexis Jazz is irrelevant here. You cannot deny me of my right to participate in this DR. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No support for the nominator's argument that the redirect should be deleted. The actual file can be nominated if desired. --King of ♥ 06:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this file is out of copyright or the copyright is owned by the uploader. Karitxa (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 06:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robjensen1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re mostly cropped image. Please reupload images at full resolution directly from your camera.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robjensen1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing EXIF informations on newly created Flickr account, probably COM:LL

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: you had some dealing with this at File:Ugonau.jpg. Any comment? -mattbuck (Talk) 20:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable bad Flickr account. Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Robjensen1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. This is more suitable in the Spanish Wikipedia. pandakekok9 05:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anncathrins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The backgrounds of those photos are very unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures are my own work. I am a photagrafer and social media manager for "Svartnissen". The page is made on their behalf, with the text and photos that they have chosen for me to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anncathrins (talk • contribs) 11:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not in scope either. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 14:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raster version (fake SVG) of File:Missouri Democratic presidential primary election results by county, 2020.svg. Redundant and superseded. pandakekok9 14:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right now they're basically duplicates so  Delete.Jonteemil (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Workplace Millennial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Dw no source since (dw no source since). @Baomi, can we get a date on when the author died or if this is a government work (as it's in a government museum)? Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This sculpture was created by sculptor Ye Yushan in 1962, and Ye died in 2017. I neglected to check the copyright before--Baomi (talk) 03:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per DonaldTrung. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bjoernnielsen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam uploads - source field is link spam. Also possible copyvios.

MER-C 17:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless - KindUser (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

삭제요청 바랍니다 나다사전 (talk) 05:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Millennium Falcon Cjp24 (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter (Rik Verheyden) died in 1954; so it's still copyrighted and the permission is missing Velocitas (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Azerbaijan, sculptor's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.ilmessaggero.it/abruzzo/andrea_muzii_roma_campione_memoria_cina-4904754.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is very unlikely that user:Nerazzurra18 has taken this photograph before 1978 Goesseln (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily below COM:TOO, and no COM:TOO Iran. Ahmadtalk 20:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can find no evidence that this was released into the public domain, and I'm not sure the top sphere element qualifies for PD-Textlogo. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of an organization, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 02:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May i know the reason? As i acknowledge it is my team's work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salmanyusop (talk • contribs) 04:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:OTRS permission required. --ƏXPLICIT 00:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo may have been taken by the uploader but there is no evidence that the content of this image (the map and explanatory text) was created by the uploader. The map seems to be publically displayed on an information board - see webpage https://www.oberharz.de/sommer/wandern-im-harz/gesteinskundlicher-lehrpfad-sankt-andreasberg# . There is no evidence that the copyright status of the actual map and text is compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, I suggest that this image should be removed from Wikimedia Commons as a precaution - see COM:PCP. GeoWriter (talk) 13:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a photograph of 1940 with unknown photographer is neither cc nor pd Goesseln (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Well the source is filled and showing that it was published more than 70 years ago so I believe that {{PD-anon-70}} is aplicable. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 14:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


Kept: Sorry but I don't see a reason for deletion. If it bugs you that the file is not exactly the same as a traffic sign, you can suggest to rename the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ajout de la mise à jours et replacer sur l'article Aegidium Anthony Rauchen (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Machine translation: "addition of the update and replace on the Aegidium article"
No valid reason for deletion? This file was replaced with File:Diamant Palace Left.jpg in the article. Different perspective, not sure which would be more accurate. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raster version (fake SVG) of File:Idaho Democratic presidential primary election results by county, 2020.svg. Redundant and superseded. pandakekok9 14:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raster version (fake SVG) of File:Mississippi Democratic presidential primary election results by county, 2020.svg. Redundant and superseded. pandakekok9 14:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right now they're basically duplicates so  Delete.Jonteemil (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

newspapers with copyrightable works (ie, photos) are NOT covered by PD-RU-exempt PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PlanespotterA320: I downloaded another version. Without photo. --Knopik-som (talk) 18:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The old version hidden. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Please provide evidence it has been published before 1987. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken before 1974 as Lt-Gen Saad El Shazly retired from military service around 1974-1975. Check [[10]]. Also Field Marshal Ahmed Ismail Ali died in Decenber 1974. --Ashashyou (talk) 10:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ashashyou: You don't understand: we need evidence it has been published. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was previously published here. Either an OTRS ticket or proof that the image is on the public domain is required, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination> It is not totally good assumption that painting would be contemporary, particularly religious paintings which can be done hundreds or thousands of years after the demise of the subject. This one was uploaded as "own work" which it obviously was not. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Logo is a fake, The original version of this logo is available here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USM_Bel_Abb%C3%A8s_logo.png DZwarrior1 (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on en:USM Bel Abbès and fr:Coupe d'Algérie de football 2017-2018. Under COM:NPOV that means it should not be deleted just for being inaccurate. --bjh21 (talk) 12:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Regardless of other concerns, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a photograph of 1940 with unknown photographer is neither cc nor pd Goesseln (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright problem at all. The photograph was taken in the 1930'. It was published in a periodical - in 1940 - Film Szinház Irodalom - October, 1940 - Nr 42. So, whats the problem ? After beeing published - in 1940 - 70 years in the case of unknown photographer = that is 2010. In 2020 it was only republished: https://www.flickr.com/photos/59061037@N02/49587490512/in/dateposted-public/
--Elekes Andor (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
please read and try to understand what is written in Template:PD-old
This template should be used for files whose authors died more than 70 years ago
when there is no known author, then there is no death, in that case we agreed to take c:Template:PD-old-assumed, when (when!) the picture is older than 120 years, that is 1900 from now.
--Goesseln (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to the hungarian law: In the case of unknown photographer, copyright period is: date when the photo was published (1940) + 70 years = 2010.

1999 évi LXXVI. tv:       https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=99900076.tv

A védelmi idő 31. § (1) A szerzői jogok a szerző életében és halálától számított hetven éven át részesülnek védelemben. (2) *  A hetvenéves védelmi időt a szerző halálát követő év első napjától, közös művek esetében az utoljára elhunyt szerzőtárs halálát követő év első napjától kell számítani. (3) Ha a szerző személye nem állapítható meg, a védelmi idő a mű első nyilvánosságra hozatalát követő év első napjától számított hetven év. Ha azonban ez alatt az idő alatt a szerző jelentkezik, a védelmi időt a (2) bekezdés szerint kell számítani. --Elekes Andor (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fine, so go ahead and read Template:PD-HU-unknown if that could be applicable here, and everything will be ok. --Goesseln (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I do it. --Elekes Andor (talk) 09:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is a problematic user, he marked the author as unknown several times, even though the name of the author was in the source (for example Mindszenthy Tibor.png, Adorján Éva.jpg, Berenczei Kováts kúria.png, Róna Viktor.png, Gyöngyösi Betyárcsárda.jpg). --Regasterios (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Szóval mi a probléma ? Több mint 70 éve, de egyébként 1943 előtt közzétették a fényképet, a szerző ismeretlen. Gondolom, ha ismert lenne a szerző, akkor megadtátok és a fejemre olvastátok volna. Ennyire régi, közzétett fényképeknél értelmetlen a nagy nyomozás. Ha egyszer senki, sehol nem adja meg a szerzőt, akkor annak kell legyen valami oka. A szerző személye attól nem lesz ismert, hogy én problémás vagyok vagy sem. Amúgy különös, hogy minél inkább fontos a magyar történeti emlékezet szempontjából egy fénykép, annál dühödtebben támadtok.A Fortepán esetében persze egyáltalán nem kell megjelölni a szerzőt, elég az adományozó esetleg maga a Fortepán. A szervezetek is azt töltenek fel amit akarnak. Ugyan miért ? A szerzőt akkor is meg kell nevezni a szerzői jogi törvény szerint, ha a vagyoni jogokkal más rendelkezik. Ezt úgy hívják, hogy kettős mérce. --Elekes Andor (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Closing as stale. Can be renominated without prejudice. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Datei hochgeladen, soll ersetzt werden Georg Karl Ell (talk) 16:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Docs of Soviet Com.Party are not official docs in the terms of Russian copyright law. Alex Spade (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Soviet law excluded from copyright official documents issued by both state organizations and non-governmental organizations (see article 134 of 1991 law [11]). Party card is an official document issued by such organization. Related discussion: ru:Википедия:Форум/Авторское право#Партбилет КПСС. --M5 (talk) 09:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Berne Convention do not allow such exemption. Alex Spade (talk) 11:38, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Closing as stale. Can be renominated without prejudice. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Party card is not an official documents of state government agencies and local government agencies of municipal formations. Yellow Horror (talk) 01:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Spurious DRs with invalid rationale. See M5's argument in the previous nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Copied from https://www.hakendover.be/1-7-Gebouwen%20en%20bezienswaardigheden%20in%20Hakendover%20en%20Wulmersum.44 Henxter (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hier staat Afbeelding:bosschellen.jpg Vrijgegeven voor publicatie door de auteur: http://www.hakendover.be
Is er nagelaten in 2005 een OTRS vraag te sturen? Misschien kan het alsnog? Mvg, Lidewij (talk) 07:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped image copyviol from https://www.massimo.delmese.net/140275/larcivescovo-di-salerno-mons-bellandi-riceve-il-pallio-in-vaticano/ Antonio1952 (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

La persona a destra di Mons. Bellandi nella fotografia è il sottoscritto, la suddetta foto è stata scattata con il mio cellulare da uno degli addetti alla sicurezza della Basilica di San Pietro, luogo ove è stata scattata la foto. Prima di segnalare vi prego di informarvi, grazie e buon proseguimento di serata.

Dott. Alessio Scarpa, FRNS — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.65.216.15 (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]