Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/02/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Accidental upload 1940343sayak (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 02:13, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 08:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
request for speedy deletion: accidental creation, no content WikiVagant (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SHIVESHshukla9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope. Didn't tag 5 other files as they already have ongoing DRs.
- File:Shivesh Shukla With hostel friends.jpg
- File:SHIVESH SHUKLA with Durgesh Lilhare In Nawgong.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla At Clg.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla with mother.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla Selfie picture.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla and Ankur Mishra Clg.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla Selfie.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla Going to home.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla At work now.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla At village.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla At hospital.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla At train.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla On the Home.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla At the class.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla at government engineering college Nawgong.jpg
- File:Shivesh Shukla and pankaj Patel.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 07:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 12:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Television logos in China
[edit]Complex logos per COM:TOO China. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of television channels and networks of China.
- File:CCTV-世界地理.png
- File:CCTV-发现之旅.png
- File:CCTV-国防军事.png
- File:CCTV-央视台球.png
- File:CCTV-央视文化精品.png
- File:CCTV-女性时尚.png
- File:CCTV-怀旧剧场.png
- File:CCTV-电视指南.png
- File:CCTV-第一剧场.png
- File:CCTV-老故事.png
- File:CCTV-风云剧场.png
- File:CCTV-风云足球.png
- File:CCTV-风云音乐.png
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --1989 (talk) 12:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Likely from http://www.seguonews.it/gela-calcio-il-comune-si-rivolge-alle-aziende-del-territorio-per-salvare-la-squadra-avviata-una-raccolta-fondi Ytoyoda (talk) 12:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato Ismael Olea (talk) 06:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 12:34, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato Ismael Olea (talk) 06:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 12:34, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato, Sinsentido, Borrosa Ismael Olea (talk) 06:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 12:34, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Sinsentido, Borrosa, Un autorretrato Ismael Olea (talk) 06:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 12:34, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato, Sinsentido Ismael Olea (talk) 06:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 12:34, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Sinsentido Ismael Olea (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:54, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: Not own work - Adobe stock image --Krdbot 20:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Shekh Mahmudul Hasan (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: file page without file. --JuTa 07:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I botched this and will upload a replacement; the wrong checkboxes are checked Superacidic (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Photographer is unknown and photo was taken 1949, very unlikely photographer is dead > 70 years Magnus (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Raymond 17:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Eu mudei de ideia, eu não quero mais que seja publicamente visível RicardoArantes1 (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File page without file. File has already been deleted. --Achim (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
copyrighted Dojawab (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:45, 16 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. --Krdbot 20:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Logo Ismael Olea (talk) 06:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial organization logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Logo Ismael Olea (talk) 06:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:43, 17 Februar 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
This image is fraudulent. It is not a "Qing painting" but a modern photoshop vandalism of the portrait of Ogedei Khan at the National Palace Museum in Taipei, Taiwan. It has been cropped, the color of bis clothing changed from yellow to red, the color of his hair changed from red to black, his eyes from blue to black, and his facial features altered. See the original portrait this was based on here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9e/YuanEmperorAlbumOgedeiPortrait.jpg/800px-YuanEmperorAlbumOgedeiPortrait.jpg Hunan201p (talk) 07:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Assuming that what is stated above is the truth, I agree with the deletion of this image. ---TrynaMakeADollar (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/BYoCOxyFUPX/?igshid=1cxhjrkqmygxj, which isn’t a problem, but requires permission from the photographer via COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted newspaper A1Cafel (talk) 06:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 17:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 17:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 23:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 17:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Tower of the Sun
[edit]Per COM:FOP Japan, the tower cannot be uploaded to Commons. Sorry for my mistakes.
- File:The Tower of the Sun, EXPO'70, Osaka; January 2020 (01).jpg
- File:The Tower of the Sun, EXPO'70, Osaka; January 2020 (02).jpg
- File:The Tower of the Sun, EXPO'70, Osaka; January 2020 (03).jpg
- File:The Tower of the Sun, EXPO'70, Osaka; January 2020 (04).jpg
- File:The Tower of the Sun, EXPO'70, Osaka; January 2020 (05).jpg
- File:The Tower of the Sun, EXPO'70, Osaka; January 2020 (06).jpg
- File:The Tower of the Sun, EXPO'70, Osaka; January 2020 (07).jpg
··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @PlanespotterA320: I'm not sure I understand your concern. The term of copyright in Russia is pma. 70 irrespective of publication (Article 1281 §1). Unless there is evidence that the work was first published after the author's death, by a legal successor or inheritor, but before the expiration of the original copyright term (Article 1281 §3), then this copyright has expired.Even if the Russian copyright had not expired on the URAA date (1996), the US copyright would have been the earlier of 95 years after first publication or 120 years after creation, both of which have now elapsed. --Xover (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Author in Леонид Валентинович Средин (1860-1909) [1]. First publication not later than 1939 [2] --Butko (talk) 12:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Butko: The 70 year PMA is not irrespective of publication - it is only if the item was published during the lifetime of the author. There was no indication this was published during the lifetime of the author when I filed this nomination. When there is nothing but a dead URL, the only publication information at hand is that is was published posthumously. We cannot assume that something "had" to have been published earlier than the publication indicated in the source section. Anyway, good thing you found that postcard, which shows it is public domain after all. I'll edit the descriptions and withdraw this.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- By default, we need evidence that a work was published during an author's lifetime - the other way around.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Butko: The 70 year PMA is not irrespective of publication - it is only if the item was published during the lifetime of the author. There was no indication this was published during the lifetime of the author when I filed this nomination. When there is nothing but a dead URL, the only publication information at hand is that is was published posthumously. We cannot assume that something "had" to have been published earlier than the publication indicated in the source section. Anyway, good thing you found that postcard, which shows it is public domain after all. I'll edit the descriptions and withdraw this.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Author in Леонид Валентинович Средин (1860-1909) [3]. First publication not later than 1939 [4] --Butko (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Since publication was found. Would have been nice for that publication to have been in the file description though.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дилшодбек Аскаров (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Uzbek national handmade muppets.jpg
- File:Uzbek national handmde muppets.jpg
- File:Grapes made from grapes.jpg
- File:Uzbek national head caps.jpg
- File:Uzbek national head cap for women.jpg
- File:Uzbek wooden door.jpg
- File:Uzbek ceramics.jpg
- File:Uzbek national ceramics.jpg
- File:Uzbek national bread.jpg
- File:Uzbek national plov.jpg
- File:Uzbek national knives.jpg
- File:Uzbek folk dance.jpg
- File:A car made from fruits.jpg
- File:Aplle made from the apples.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
All files uploaded by me I took myself on my phone MDC Prime Lite during Open Andijan Investment forum which held in Andijan city, Uzbekistan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Дилшодбек Аскаров (talk • contribs) 14:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Дилшодбек Аскаров (talk) 14:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Дилшодбек Аскаров
- @Дилшодбек Аскаров: Please re-upload the files from your phone. These were taken from Facebook per the metadata so there is doubt as to authorship Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дилшодбек Аскаров
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Дилшодбек Аскаров (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- The user uploaded them him/herself and took it with their phone as I was informed. They are part of the Wiki Loves Folk campaign and show a part of Uzbek folk culture (dance, typical souvenirs, ceramics, food). I see no reason why they should be deleted.--Sparrow (麻雀) (talk) 14:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- User could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep. Small resolution and lack of metadata is not a reason to delete. The consistent nature of the subjects and scene and the fact that the photos are not found elsewhere on the Web is enough to suggest the uploader is the photographer. While the law regarding freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan is not compatible with Commons (see COM:FOP Uzbekistan), COM:UZBEKISTAN says that "national creative works" or "folk products" are exempt from copyright, so most, if not all, of these photos should be okay, even if they depict sculptures, puppets, or other artworks, since this appears to be an event associated with Uzbek culture (see also {{PD-UZ-exempt}}). clpo13(talk) 16:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from FB per MD. Uploader needs to upload originals with exif. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed48800 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:البوراك العنابي--المطبخ الجزائري.jpg
- File:التالشت العنابي -المطبخ الجزائري-.jpg
- File:قريتلية طبق تقليدي خاص بمدينة عنابة الجزائرية.jpg
- File:اللفة العنابية لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:قندورة البيرلاج العنابية لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:انواع القاط العنابي.jpg
- File:قندورة التل العنابية لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:القاط العنابي لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:قندورة الخساب العنابية لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:اللباس التقليدي لمدينة عنابة الجزائرية.jpg
- File:الشاشية السلطاني العنابية.jpg
- File:قندورة الفتلة العنابية لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:قندورة الكوكتال العنابية لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:قفطان الفتلة العنابي لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
- File:الدلالة العنابية لباس تقليدي جزائري.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valérie Banyuls (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, missing permission.
- File:Jeu à XIII.jpg
- File:Photo 1977 -championat à XIII.pdf
- File:Photo equipe de france 1975.jpg
- File:TROPHEE XIII.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE? Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Possibly inscope but likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vijay bawankule (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
The link indicates that the image is copyrighted. Suzy Oh tell me 18:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The original passed flickrreview see File:Katy Perry and Greg (47870635411).jpg Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Original passed flickrreview - license is irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Please delete this file. --Kirchenfan (talk) 11:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Please delete this file. --Kirchenfan (talk) 11:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magnolia677 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.alamy.com/ruined-mill-buildings-and-stream-rocky-valley-between-boscastle-and-tintagel-cornwall-uk-image218406035.html Magnolia677 (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw this nomination. On closer inspection it is not the same image as the copyrighted image. My apology to the uploader. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I did take this picture myself on holiday in Cornwall. Apology accepted. Kmtextor (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Total Defence logos
[edit]Reasons for deletion request - Copyright infringement. 1. No proof of the uploader being the copyright owner of the logos. 2. Website from which the logos can come from has TnCs that is non-commercial license at the best, which is not allowed on commons. Robertsky (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo for non-wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 19:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Website says ©2020, so ne evidence of cc-license Avron (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Minichamps less the three images with OTRS permission
[edit]As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS.
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12119698545).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12119772645).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12119782245).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12119996993).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12120017393).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12120039123).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12120159754).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12120346996).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12120380556).jpg
- File:1970 Citroen SM by Minichamps in 1-43 scale (12120401086).jpg
- File:1999 Volvo S80.jpg
- File:Minichampsmicrochampsfordescortrscosworth.jpg
- File:Wiki F1.jpg
Arosio Stefano (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Arosio Stefano: The manufacturer's approval is available for the photos of Minichamps models I have uploaded. I therefore ask you to withdraw your request for deletion immediately. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- You are right, I haven't noticed the OTRS. I have edited and deleted the OTRS files from this list.--Arosio Stefano (talk) 20:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Arosio Stefano: The manufacturer's approval is available for the photos of Minichamps models I have uploaded. I therefore ask you to withdraw your request for deletion immediately. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; sadly. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software, likely copyright violation. 2001:4BB8:258:2BEF:F0C3:30C:83AF:D521 22:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software, likely copyright violation. 2001:4BB8:258:2BEF:F0C3:30C:83AF:D521 22:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software, likely copyright violation. 89.144.219.59 22:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Speedy DR replaced by @Mdaniels5757: by Canadian air force image, covered by Crown Copyright. Image: [5], copyright info [6].
- Not sure Crown Copyright allows commercial use. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I replaced your speedy DR with another speedy DR because the reason why you stated the file was a copyvio was wrong. The site you linked to did not own the copyright (nor did it credit the source and owner). Therefore, I replaced your speedy tag with a new nomination that correctly states that the reason that the image is a copyvio is because it is a Canadian Government work covered by Crown Copyright (and the terms under which it may be used are non-free, see [7]), not because it is owned by owensboroliving.com. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: No, the rationale was sufficient to have the file deleted, and for numerous reasons: 1) there was no source, 2) Both "Historic photo is property of US Air Force" and {{PD-USGov}} were wrong since image was from RCAF, 3) Commons policy requires that, for files previously published under an unfree license (like https://www.owensboroliving.com/the-buzz/canadian-snowbirds-headline-air-show/) copyright holder has to send a written permission. Perhaps http://rcaf-arc-images.forces.gc.ca/gallery/caf/detail/?filename=FA03-2015-0001-15&assetId=2703 is the original source but it doesn't matter here: file would have been nevertheless deleted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I replaced your speedy DR with another speedy DR because the reason why you stated the file was a copyvio was wrong. The site you linked to did not own the copyright (nor did it credit the source and owner). Therefore, I replaced your speedy tag with a new nomination that correctly states that the reason that the image is a copyvio is because it is a Canadian Government work covered by Crown Copyright (and the terms under which it may be used are non-free, see [7]), not because it is owned by owensboroliving.com. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Not own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Iketsi (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Also: File:Pardo60-ext-C-0000-mins.jpg
This image has appeared on the web -- such as at https://www.springbrookmarina.com/pardo-yachts-revolutionizes-the-concept-of-long-range-navigation/ and https://www.pressmare.it/en/shipyards/pardo-yachts/2020-01-20/new-pardo-endurance-60-25004 . The first of those is the same size as the upload here. I think we the copyright owner to go through the COM:OTRS process to verify the license on the upload, as otherwise there is no way to tell if this is an authorized license or just an image copied off the internet. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/08/surprise-turns-out-the-left-is-still-alive Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC) Since in use already, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per File:Andrew Gillum Official Photo.png. --Wow (talk) 19:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
https://www.naidunia.com/maharashtra-vasudeo-s-gaitonde-auction-sets-new-world-record-for-indian-art-603972, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake Ambra75 (talk) 01:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake Ambra75 (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 03:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose The right way to flag duplicates for deletion is Template:Duplicate, also, this is the older upload, so this isn't the right one to delete.--QTHCCAN (talk) 23:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- SecretName101 the duplicate is now removed.--QTHCCAN (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Duplicate already deletedeQTHCCAN (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Dieses Bild habe ich falsch hochgeladen, sorry. Beat Ruest (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(8706575877).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2406543870).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted image, altered photo, user is a reincident spammer, posts altered photos with moles in it. 201.20.169.84 03:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Support User is a frequent spammer Bastewasket (talk) 03:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader warned. --Achim (talk) 13:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pussy drive.jpg 99of9 (talk) 01:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. While the usual policy is that CC licenses are not revokable, the text makes it likely that CC license was never intended; image is of a very common object, of which Commons has a wealth of superior free licensed images. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry. It looks like you have posted inappropriate material.
It should be reviewed to see if it is useful for educational purposes. Victor ericson (talk) 13:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
The version is oversighted. Taivo (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 00:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. GFJ (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, unused personal photo. GFJ (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
요즘 본명으로 활동하고 있어서 예명인 윤이주 지식백과 페이지를 삭제하려고 합니다. 윤이주 (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: We do not delete user talk pages, but you can request a renaming on meta. --Achim (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Madame Tussauds Hollywood
[edit]No COM:FOP US in USA for such sculptures.
- File:Ryan Reynolds figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45033936434).jpg
- File:Jason Derulo figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45033937104).jpg
- File:Jackie Chan figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (46063887731).jpg
- File:Katharine Hepburn figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45967249392).jpg
- File:Jackie Chan figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45151972055).jpg
- File:Quentin Tarantino figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45294514004).jpg
- File:Steven Spielberg figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45107043395).jpg
- File:Alfred Hitchcock figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45292633854).jpg
- File:Betty White figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (30932563437).jpg
- File:Arnold Schwarzenegger (as Terminator) figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (46014006632).jpg
- File:Elizabeth Taylor (as Cleopatra) figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (46016750281).jpg
- File:Robert Redford & Paul Newman figures at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45105260885).jpg
- File:Bob Hope & George Burns figures at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (44071000750).jpg
- File:John Travolta (as Danny Zuko of "Grease") figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45969009202).jpg
- File:Whitney Houston (as Rachel Marron of "The Bodyguard") figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45982608782).jpg
- File:Cameron Diaz (as Mary Jensen of "There's Something About Mary") figure at Madame Tussauds Hollywood (45968987622).jpg
- File:The Homewrecker at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
- File:Likeness of the animated movie character "Shrek" at Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum in the Hollywood section of Los Angeles, California LCCN2013631570.tif
- File:Jimmy Stewart figure revisits Bedford Falls, the setting of his role in the beloved Christmas movie "It's a Wonderful Life," at Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum in the Hollywood section of Los Angeles, LCCN2013631580.tif
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Hollywood_(46014006632).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Hollywood_(46016750281).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Hollywood_(45969009202).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Hollywood_(45982608782).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Hollywood_(45968987622).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 14:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused picture of unexplained object. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation SYSS Mouse (talk) 20:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 20:16, 16 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Porque sí Sinsentido Ismael Olea (talk) 06:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I accidently created a new article for the cropped version. I’ve listed this file at COM:MERGE.Jonteemil (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Merged this file to the original file. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by FlickreviewR 2 as no license (No license since) ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 06:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: which was correct. --JuTa 02:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be an unfinished piece of work. Not appropriate for the Commons Richard Avery (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry Bad Focus Gillfoto 01:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:29, 26 März 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 01:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant automated scale up and crop of File:The Orion Nebula Spied by Hawk-I.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Blurry, not helpful. Better images exist at Category:Peugeot 306. GFJ (talk) 00:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, not helpful - future use is not conceivable. GFJ (talk) 00:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Greendoor RW (talk · contribs)
[edit]Impossible to be rightholder and own work for the given person
- File:Preisverleihung der Deutschen Meisterschaft (Jugend) im Mannschaftszeitfahren1994.jpg
- File:Paul Stahala bei der deutschen Rennrad-Junioren-Nationalmannschaft.jpg
_im_Mannschaftszeitfahren1994.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Brotfried (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Both submitted to me by the displayed person from his private archive with permission to use them: --Greendoor RW (talk) 10:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, need OTRS, and out of scope too. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, not helpful. No future use conceivable. GFJ (talk) 00:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, not helpful. No future use conceivable. GFJ (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, not helpful. Probably out of scope as well. No future use conceivable. GFJ (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, not helpful. No future use conceivable. GFJ (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, not helpful. No future use conceivable. GFJ (talk) 00:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, not helpful. No future use conceivable. GFJ (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Superceded by File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Australia.svg and no longer used or updated. Redundant file A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. –hueman1 (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Superceded by File:2019-nCoV Outbreak World Map.svg and no longer used or updated. Redundant file. A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I agree --Robins7 (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality. Entirely replaced by File:2019-nCoV Outbreak World Map.svg. Uses borders that are obsolete for the time of the outbreak (2019-2020). Redundant file A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
file name is already in use. will upload again with new name JonP125 (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Logo Ismael Olea (talk) 06:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
_(8706575877).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8706575877).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
_(8706575877).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
_(8706575877).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Flamenco en el Palacio Andaluz, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 19.JPG Poco a poco (talk) 07:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Very small, low quality and unused image, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 08:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Logo Ismael Olea (talk) 08:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very dark and not very ilustrative. Ismael Olea (talk) 08:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
too dark and not illustrative. Ismael Olea (talk) 08:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
selfie. Ismael Olea (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
No information about original image that has been taken in 1980s. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing author/date/permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Found on other websites under copyright [8] Roumpf (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
No authorization. Extract from YouTube. Tyseria (d) 11:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
OTRS tickets required
- File:Simmaniduo esimene kassett.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo ja Kukerpillid kassett 1992.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo ja Kukerpillid kassett esikülg1992.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander Karu kannel.jpg
- File:Kandlemees kannel kandlemuusika rahvamuusika.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander kannel.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo Tule simmanile CD.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo Tule simmanile sisekülg.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo CD Tule simmanile sisu.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo tule simmanile tagakaas.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo Tule simmanile esikaas.jpg
- File:1 kannel ja rahvalikud laulud Kandlemees Sander CD tagakülg.jpg
- File:1 kannel ja rahvalikud laulud Kandlemees Sander CD sisekülg.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander Kandlemuusika kogu perele sisekülg.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander Kandlemuusika kogu perele tagakaas.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander Kandlemuusika kogu perele esikaas.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo kassett 1990.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:593A:3875:FFCD:D94F 09:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Sanderk
[edit]- File:Sander-Karu-LP-taga.jpg
- File:Sander-Karu-LP-esi.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander Karu kandlelood CD tagakaas.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander Karu kandlelood CD ja esikaas.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander 1 kannel ja rahvalikud laulud taga.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander 1 kannel ja rahvalikud laulud esi.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo Tule simmanile sisu.jpg
- File:Kandlemees Sander Kandlemuusika kogu perele sise.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo kassett üld.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo Kukerpillid kassett üld.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo Kukerpillid kassett sisu.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo kassett sisu.jpg
- File:5JH170214-Kannel003.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo Kukerpillid kassett esikülg.jpg
- File:Simmaniduo kassett esikülg.jpg
- File:Simmaniduologo sargile170713.jpg
The above files require an OTRS ticket. GFJ (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @GFJ: If you wish to perform a batch DR automatically, you can use VFC to assist you. 1989 (talk) 13:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
This is not a photograph of Gok Wan, as it purports to be. Craitman17 (talk) 13:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
This is not a photograph of Mark Viduka, as it purports to be. Craitman17 (talk) 13:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manisinghq1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No source/permission. +seems to be adverts.
- File:Laser Hair Removal Cost In India.jpg
- File:Top 10 Gynecologist in Vadodara.jpg
- File:IVF Success Rate in India.jpg
- File:IVF Cost In India.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 13:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Music group, not notable. 176.59.52.209 13:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Music group, not notable. 176.59.52.209 13:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Star cluster NGC 6752.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Bubbles Within Bubbles.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused file. Blurred image of number 101 with very unclear description. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:The Crown Prince Couple of Denmark admire the night skies of ESO's Paranal Observatory (wallpaper).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:The Crown Prince Couple of Denmark admire the night skies of ESO's Paranal Observatory.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:HubbleDeepField.800px.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Four VLT Unit Telescopes Working as One.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:The Trapezium Cluster.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Trailing stars above Paranal.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Thunderbolts and lightning.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of a video game that is certainly in copyright Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
not own work, photo from https://krakow.naszemiasto.pl/street-view-w-krakowie-od-16-czerwca-samochody-googlea-na/ar/c4-951817 Thraen (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Derivative of a copyrighted work: Crazy Frog. HyperGaruda (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, please send permission from the original author(s).
- File:فلسطين عربي.jpg
- File:The slogan of the United States and the Palestinian.gif
- File:United States Palestinian.gif
HyperGaruda (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Unhelpful Anmol1311 (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Counselindia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope. -6 files that were tagged as F10.
- File:Spiritual India - 7.jpg
- File:Native India - 1.jpg
- File:Spiritual India - 6.jpg
- File:Spiritual India - 5.jpg
- File:Spiritual India - 3.jpg
- File:Spiritual India - 2.jpg
- File:Village of India - 4.jpg
- File:Village of India - 5.jpg
- File:Village of India - 1.jpg
- File:Village of India - 3.jpg
- File:Village of India - 2.jpg
- File:I am an Advocate and Author settled in Delhi, India- I deal with criminal and civil cases in Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and various District Courts of Delhi- I have authored several books on diff 2014-04-20 02-49.JPG
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 16:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Comment File:Native India - 1.jpg & File:Spiritual India - 3.jpg can be kept. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:52, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I didn't keep -1 because unlike all other uploads, it was missing the EXIF data, and I didn't keep -3 because it's out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: eligible (PD-textlogo) but out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Lacks a license for its home country Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
70 year period since author’s death (1956-08-12, cf. de:Ernst Kreidolf) not expired. My bad. -- j. 'mach' wust | ✍ 10:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2027 (or ping me or another admin to move to sister project that allows PD-US only). --Storkk (talk) 11:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samuelfournier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Since the metadata credits Remy Boily as the photographer, requires evidence of permission through COM:OTRS.
- File:Samuel Fournier entraîneur des Géants 2016.jpg
- File:Samuel Fournier entraîneur des Géants de Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu.jpg
- File:Samuel Fournier est maintenant entraîneur des Géants du Cégep de Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 12:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. PantherStrix (talk) 12:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Question Bist Du der Fotograf? — Speravir – 16:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: User requested deletion of own recently uploaded file. --Storkk (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
per COM:CUR Canada and COM:CUR Australia Ankry (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Before this gets deleted, I would like to propose a way to replace this image - I can re-shoot the image and replace it with a version which has the material in question absent, as to satisfy the above policies. Please consider this.--BrayLockBoy (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Before I go about uploading the replacement file (which will not be uploaded over this file in particular), I would like to specify that the only coins present in the image will be from the USA; per COM:CUR United States, "Many but not all coins or bills produced by the United States Mint are in the public domain as works of the Federal Government." The coins featured in this image will be examples that satisfy public domain.
- The replacement file can be found at File:Various types of American silver coinage, 15 February 2020.jpg.--BrayLockBoy (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Thank you, BrayLockBoy for taking the alternative!. --Storkk (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Envision Scientific National Award for indigenous research in 2018 from Hon. President Mr. Ramnath Kovind.jpg
[edit]
Its different image and should not be deleted Sunil Acharya (talk) 13:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't understand the original rationale, however this is small size and has no metadata. Photographer should confirm the license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Any evidence it has been published 1986 and that it falls under 1992 law. Probably not public domain in the U.S.A. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I have found the copyright holder. They will give permission in a few days, stay tuned.Pensées de Pascal (talk) 09:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:CauxRoundTable1986.png” under ticket:2020031910004926. --Thibaut (talk) 12:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS validated. --Storkk (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy DR: Found around the web, those images have no or incompatible licence and no permission. COM:PRP when not obvious copyvio.
- File:Tonidacheva.jpg
- File:Cveti radoicheva.jpg
- File:Hristo-Kidikov.jpg
- File:Svetlaivanova.jpg
- File:Plamen-stavrev.jpg
- File:Svetla ivanova.jpg
- File:Drago Draganov.jpg
- File:Lili Ivanova zala Olympia.jpg
- File:Margret Nikolova s pesen v jivota.gif (old enough to be in public domain? Wrong licence anyway)
- File:Margret Nikolova na mladini.gif (old enough to be in public domain? Wrong licence anyway)
- File:Margret nikolova 2008.gif
- File:Veselinmarinov.jpg
- File:Irina-Florin.jpg
- File:Elvirageorgieva.jpg
- File:Margihranova.jpg
- File:Asengargov.jpg
- File:Stefanmitrov.jpg
- File:Alexandravasileva.jpg
- File:Kostadindurev.jpg
- File:AnastasNaumov.jpg
- File:Boris Gudjunov-15.jpg
- File:Ludmila-slaneva.jpg
- File:Mustafa-chaushev-zlaten-vek2013.jpg
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- I do not select absolutely all user's images because some seem old enough to may be in public domain. Two above could be in the public domain. Anyhow, I do not understand his licence choices. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Maybe I'm wrong licenses. Please images can not be erased.Nivelir (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Пенка Павлова.jpg
- File:Georgi-Chilingirov 1-560x416.jpg
- File:Margret Nikolova 2019.jpg
- File:Josiph Kobzon Vostryakovsko kladbishte.jpg
- File:Nedyalka Keranova.jpg
- File:Ivan Panovski.jpg
- File:Dimitar Simeonov Moncho.jpg
- File:Mustafa Chaushev 2018.jpg
- File:Stoyan Velichkov.jpg
- File:St. Gyokova.jpg
- File:Nelly Rangelova.jpg
- File:Daniela Stoichkova.jpg
- File:Dr.Draganov.jpg
- File:Ludmilasl.jpg
- File:Alexandravas.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Excessive retouch Wilfredor (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep: The file is in use. --2806:10B7:2:EF3B:9D3F:9F1D:5A5D:66F1 23:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- No its not in use and anonymus users can vote? --Wilfredor (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: @Wilfredor: Yes, is in use. You can see it in "File usage on other wikis" --Gindomarlo (talk) 01:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- No its not in use and anonymus users can vote? --Wilfredor (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. That a file was used once on a talk page does not mean we are required to keep it in perpetuity, see COM:INUSE: "that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope.". --Storkk (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake, the SVG version is regularly updated (
) Julio974◆ (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - png is unused and has no educational use beyond SVG file, especially given that png is not kept up-to-date with SVG. Uploader request. --Storkk (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15561102806).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(40492717963).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)
[edit]impossible to review. impossible to determine if this video was shot for voa or in his personal capacity.
- File:Field being set-up for Super Bowl LII halftime show (00) (cropped).png
- File:Field being set-up for Super Bowl LII halftime show (00).png
- File:Arash Arabasadi - .@VOANews HalftimeShow is about to start at SuperBowlLII.webm
_(cropped).png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
RZuo (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep Easy review. He was attending as a press personal credentialed with/by VOA to cover the Super Bowl, therefore media of of the game they captured was as part of that assignment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretName101 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC) (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 16:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Faulgas-Blasen, Emder Hafen 1.jpg, both files are not in use. 89.144.219.59 22:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No, it isn't. One is a photoshopped version of the other. --Achim (talk) 22:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Regarding "Note: Some third party images have been used throughout the website and these are credited accordingly. Images credited to others are not covered by the Oireachtas (Open Data) PSI Licence outlined below." please link to the page containing the image, not to the image itself. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. This image is not one of the images "credited accordingly" and is therefore free to be adapted and used as it's covered by the PSI licence. Bastun (talk) 14:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brendan Howlin (official portrait) (cropped).jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by CaneFluteMan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Regarding "Note: Some third party images have been used throughout the website and these are credited accordingly. Images credited to others are not covered by the Oireachtas (Open Data) PSI Licence outlined below." please link to the page containing the image, not to the image itself.
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. This image is not one of the images "credited accordingly" and is therefore free to be adapted and used as it's covered by the PSI licence. Bastun (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Image of Irish TDs hosted on oireachtas.ie are explicitedly placed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License as shown at https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/copyright-and-reuse/. CeltBrowne (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused text-only doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVFxVPTaWsU — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyBardo (talk • contribs) 15:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 20:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. No evidence of publication 70 years ago as required for PD Germany (if this is a genuinely anonymous work). Also lacking PD-US rationale. Source link does not state copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
The page where the image appears on the source link website (https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/kristallnacht-in-pictures-photos) credits to the US Holocaust Memorial and Museum (at bottom of page).
In the US Holocaust Memorial Museum archive they claim copyright on it: https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa29511 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:569:F907:500:4F2:6AA2:7F18:2D8A (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Georg Schmidt (born in 1913) was a nazi propaganda photographer. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum cannot hold the copyright of an image shot by him in 1938 in Germany. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- If Schmidt is the photographer he holds the copyright until 70 years after his death. Buidhe (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Not enough information to keep this file. The USHMM says "The youth who took the series of photographs of the burning synagogue in Ober-Ramstadt, Georg Schmidt, came from a family that opposed the Nazis." So that's most likely NOT the Georg Schmidt born in 1913, who according to web finds was born in Berlin, lived in Bremen as a newspaper photographer and only later became a Nazi propaganda photographer. Anyway, it's quite probable that "our" Georg Schmidt is not yet dead for at least 70 years. --Rosenzweig τ 21:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Any evidence it has been published 1990 and that it falls under 1992 law. Probably not public domain in the U.S.A. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Patrick Rogel: I have found the copyright holder. They will give permission in a few days, stay tuned.Pensées de Pascal (talk) 09:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:CRT_Meeting_(1990's).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020032210002252. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 13:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 14:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
ventusky images are bot allowed FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Obviously not own work unless you own the website. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 07:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
ventusky images are not allowed FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Permission is required. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 07:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Touchedamour (talk · contribs)
[edit]All seem to be derivative work.
- File:Model of iconography.jpg
- File:Model lingerie imagery.jpg
- File:Model shooting a lingerie session.jpg
- File:Couple photography sepia nudity.jpg
- File:Couple nudity mirror vintage.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The last two could be found with TinEye, the other images have already been deleted (re-uploading deleted content) for example, see File:Modeling pin up lea.jpg. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Touchedamour (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 13:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Usage shows automatically in scope, the nomination rationale is incorrect. No comment on copyright status.
| # | File | Usage | Non-core |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Photographie érotique miroir, couple.jpg | 2 |
--Fæ (talk) 12:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: Thanks, struck that out. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note that the second image is the same actual photograph, different tint so a reasonable derivative. It is not logical that one print is out of scope and the other in-scope. --Fæ (talk) 12:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note that the second image is the same actual photograph, different tint so a reasonable derivative. It is not logical that one print is out of scope and the other in-scope. --Fæ (talk) 12:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Who is the illustrator? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is a simple logo (of a now defunct organisation), not an illustration.Pensées de Pascal (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Pensées de Pascal: COM:TOO depends on the country it has been created. Defunct is irrelevant since copyright survives his/her creator. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I have requested permission to use the picture to the distant descendant of MRA. It shoud be granted within days. I wonder what I would have done if there had been no such possibility. In that sense defunct would have had a meaning.Pensées de Pascal (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Pensées de Pascal: COM:TOO depends on the country it has been created. Defunct is irrelevant since copyright survives his/her creator. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Estacion Arcos Jalon 1960.jpg
- File:Guardagujas 1954 Anzánigo.jpg
- File:Estación de Anzánigo.jpg
- File:Estación en 1955.jpg
- File:Morata de Jalón 1906.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google
- File:Apeadero Castiello-Pueblo.jpg
- File:Estación de Caldearenas-Aquilué.jpg
- File:Estación de Riglos-Concilio.jpg
- File:Estación Santa María y la Peña.jpg
- File:Estacion de Castiello.jpg
- File:Anzanigo Station.jpg
- File:Estación de Morata de Jalón.jpg
- File:Estacion Sabiñan.jpg
- File:Estacion de Encinacorba.jpg
- File:Estacion de Santa Cruz de Mudela.jpg
- File:Estacion de Plasencia de Jalón.jpg
- File:Estacion de Medinaceli.jpg
- File:Estacion de Torralba vista desde la playa de vías sentido Zaragoza.jpg
- File:Estacion de almuradiel muelle.jpg
- File:Estación de Almuradiel-Viso del Marqués.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Gallego Bridge, 1867.jpg
- File:Don Segundo Ruiz MZA 1910.jpg
- File:Estación de cariñena old.png
- File:Morata de Jalón 1906.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. 1930 photograph as own work? How old are you are actually? 1910 photo taken from photographer's Facebook page? All 1910 photographers were dead before invention of Facebook. One photo was kept, because the photographer was given and he is long dead. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)}}
1938 photograph claimed as own work. Buidhe (talk) 23:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Sinsentido Ismael Olea (talk) 06:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato Ismael Olea (talk) 06:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
オリジナルの撮影者が投稿した物では無いです。 221.190.217.161 06:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no metadata, moderate resolution; no permission. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: car toy models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Really? Then I will find the worker who made this factory mold and add him/her to category:Sculptors or even make an article for the artist. :) I think (and I mean I think) we are exaggerating this toys issue. IMHO. Keep. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Wikimedia Commons does not write copyright law: if you don't like it, write to your legislator. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2406543870).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2406543870).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Metadata says photoshop. There is no camera information. Also other photograph of this persion is already present in commons. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Also good chances to get good photograph of this living person. Suggest to delete this photograph to avoid the copyvio. Ranjithsiji (talk) 06:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Previously published at http://m.reporternarua.com.br/ourinhos/noticia.php?id=16698, no evidence of permission Ytoyoda (talk) 10:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio of http://www.reporternarua.com.br/ourinhos/noticia.php?id=16698. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Previously published at https://makeachamp.com/de/samuelfournier_/28092 Uploader seems to be the subject, but the copyright belongs to the photographer, not the person in the photo. Whatever the case, an COM:OTRS ticket is needed. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no source (No source since). It has a source, but it is out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Out of scope. Seemingly, it is uploader's own compilation about astrology in Islam. --Lanhiaze (talk) 15:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: no information provided as to why this file is inferior per COM:REDUNDANT. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Not likely to be own work. All pictures uploaded by this user are about the same person, and many of them have been used on Wikipedia entries about the person herself. I don't think the lady in these photos has her own dedicated photographer thus could claim all uploads by this user are own works. Many of these pictures could be found in a previous DR here: Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_梅楣.
- File:City of San Francisco, New Year eve 2013.jpg
- File:2018梅楣美國個唱現場.jpg
- File:梅楣美國個唱現場, Sep 2018.jpg
- File:2016 演唱會照片.jpg
- File:梁萍與梅楣－2015年感恩節攝於家中.jpg
- File:梁萍與梅楣－攝於2013.jpg
Techyan（Talk） 16:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- likely copyvio based on diversity of metadata -- please have the copyright holder contact COM:OTRS. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted characters from the show Pokemon. 1989 19:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 02:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
There is absolutely no way this is de minimis. The Pokemon characters are the main purpose of this entire photo. They are large, identifiable, and the reason this photo was taken. The previous keep closure fails to even provide a rationale as to why this is de minimis. It isn't per our own rules on the matter. Majora (talk) 16:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- multiple DRs for the same reason were kept because main object is the aircraft. Focussing on the Pokemon characters would not be permitted though.--Denniss (talk) 20:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- That explanation does not hold water for this image. At all. The entire reason for this photo was due to the Pokemon livery. The title and its use clearly show that. This is one of the clearest abuses of the de minimis rules I've ever seen here. COM:DM#Guidelines #6 certainly applies and #7 most likely does. This does not fall within even the most expansive definition of de minimis and your previous close without even a semblance of a rationale was entirely inappropriate. --Majora (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- If you start to piss on me I'd say your reasoning is BS. There are lots of images of aircraft without a special livery so why are those taken at all? They are taken because the aircraft is object of interest.--Denniss (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- This photo wasn't taken for the aircraft. It was taken for the images on the side of the aircraft. Anyone that argues otherwise is not really making a good argument. It is like arguing that a photo of the Mona Lisa is really focusing on the crowds in front of it. Totally illogical. As for your question a lot of people take photos of aircraft because they like planes. A lot of people take photos of trains for the same reason. You are trying to compare a regular image of a plane to one that is a clear derivative work and unacceptable to be hosted here. --Majora (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- If you start to piss on me I'd say your reasoning is BS. There are lots of images of aircraft without a special livery so why are those taken at all? They are taken because the aircraft is object of interest.--Denniss (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- That explanation does not hold water for this image. At all. The entire reason for this photo was due to the Pokemon livery. The title and its use clearly show that. This is one of the clearest abuses of the de minimis rules I've ever seen here. COM:DM#Guidelines #6 certainly applies and #7 most likely does. This does not fall within even the most expansive definition of de minimis and your previous close without even a semblance of a rationale was entirely inappropriate. --Majora (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Under Star Athletica, the aesthetic elements of utilitarian objects can be protected by copyright if they are physically or conceptually seperable from the utilitarian object. The advertising on this plane can be perceived as a two- or three-dimensional work of art separate from the useful article and would qualify as a protectable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work either on its own or in some other medium if imagined separately from the useful article, and is therefore protected by copyright under US law. One can also use a freedom of panorama lens in this case, which also indicates that the art is protected by copyright. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ventusky images are not allowed FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: not own work, no evidence of permission. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
File:Familienkonferenz Hannover Nordstadt 184b3c POLITIK ZUM ANFASSEN e.V., v.l. Monika Dehmel, Nadine Dörffer, Gregor Dehmel.jpg
[edit]
I am the person in the middle of the picture (Nadine Dörffer) and I did not give my permission to publish this picture of me in combination with my full name on Wikimedia Commons. Please delete this picture. 130.75.236.218 21:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Kit body Viethome.png, which offers a transparent background. GFJ (talk) 22:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Incubite music concert at Second Skin nightclub in Athens, Greece in February 2012 Batch 16.JPG
[edit]
Duplicate of File:Incubite music concert at Second Skin nightclub in Athens, Greece in February 2012 Batch 17.JPG with modified colors, both files are not in use. Not useful for educational purposes. GFJ (talk) 22:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough publication to be public domain. Indicated to be from family archive of photographer, meaning it was POSTHOUMOUSLY published and still copyrighted. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also I recommend to look at her another nomination: my clean version of photo that already presents in commons. That's pure vandalism and nothing more KrakauKrakau (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- This photo was published in august 1944 in “За честь Родины” newspaper, which can be found in Archive of Ministry of Defense in Podolsk. And this nomination is the plain vandalism: PlanespotterA320 removed already this proper PD image twice in favor her own mirrored low-res version taken from the internet KrakauKrakau (talk) 04:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is not vandalism. You did not provide evidence the photo was public domain, and did not mention such publication until this deletion nomination. You are a new user, and statistically, new users have high rates of copyright violations. You have uploaded photos that are copyright violations before. You have claimed old photos as your own work. I already flipped the current fair-use version in the Russian Wikipedia article, but you insist on using this version on Commons instead. As for now, the photo in Bykov's biography should remain fair-use (what version it is, I don't care, as long as it isn't poorly colorized). I am going to check the newspaper you referenced and see if it contains attribution to the photographer - if so, then the photo would technically not be allowed on Commons for not being public domain on the URAA date even though it is currently PD in Russia (if such publication can be found). You cannot cry vandalism simply when things do not go your way. I have a long history of diligent research on the copyright status of photos, and many admins such as @Túrelio: can confirm that.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 04:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also, please send scan of the newspaper in question. Certain details in the newspaper are key to determining copyright status. (ie, was there attribution?)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 04:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is not vandalism. You did not provide evidence the photo was public domain, and did not mention such publication until this deletion nomination. You are a new user, and statistically, new users have high rates of copyright violations. You have uploaded photos that are copyright violations before. You have claimed old photos as your own work. I already flipped the current fair-use version in the Russian Wikipedia article, but you insist on using this version on Commons instead. As for now, the photo in Bykov's biography should remain fair-use (what version it is, I don't care, as long as it isn't poorly colorized). I am going to check the newspaper you referenced and see if it contains attribution to the photographer - if so, then the photo would technically not be allowed on Commons for not being public domain on the URAA date even though it is currently PD in Russia (if such publication can be found). You cannot cry vandalism simply when things do not go your way. I have a long history of diligent research on the copyright status of photos, and many admins such as @Túrelio: can confirm that.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 04:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Стоит отметить, что автор не утруждает себя тщательным проставлением лицензий на загружаемые им файлы. Например, указывает собственное авторство для фотографии 1914 года; загружает фотографию по CC-BY-SA 4.0 без указания авторства; указывает CC-0 для файла, который на самом деле {{PD-RU-exempt}}.— Redboston 22:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. {{PD-textlogo}} Jianhui67 T★C 14:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOO Hong Kong. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --SCP-2000 05:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. {{PD-textlogo}} Jianhui67 T★C 14:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOO Hong Kong. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --SCP-2000 05:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain, obviously not own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
The photo was taken by the government of a country that no longer exists (USSR), during the Great Patriotic War. Over 70 years ago. I wanted to use the original from Russian wikipedia, but it wouldn't work in the English version. [ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Дроздов,_Н.Ф.jpg] File:Drozdov, N.F.jpg If you know how to change its publication justification to non-free fair use, show me so it can continue to be used to illustrate the article about Drozdov.
- Wikimedia Commons does not allow fair-use. Upload the file locally to the Wikipedia you need to in accordance with their fair-use policy.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain, clearly not own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- You as a nominator must prove the opposite. Learn the rules and be careful. JukoFF (talk) 22:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- No. The burden of proof is on the uploader to prove the item is public domain. See Commons:Burden of proof. ("In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. Typically that requires at least that the source of the file be specified, along with the original source where the file is a derivative work") Don't tell me to learn the rules when you are the one who isn't in compliance.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the publication info was provided: Photo printed in anthology "Suduva" (1924) Renata3 (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be pd PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Is the Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia under public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. The entire Soviet Armenian Encyclopedia is published on Wikisource under Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported. The cooperation contract according to which it was given such status is on Wikimedia. --Yerevantsi (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also m:Wikimedia Armenia/Reports/2013-07. --Yerevantsi (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that http://lraber.asj-oa.am/6823/1/362.pdf is public domain. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Yes there is. It's literally in the permission section. See the website (http://lraber.asj-oa.am/) for yourself. It states that "Լրաբեր հասարակական գիտությունների =Herald of the Social Sciences applies the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode to all works we publish. Under the CCAL, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles, so long as the original authors and source are cited. In most cases, appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article. This broad license was developed to facilitate open access to, and free use of, original works of all types. Applying this standard license to your own work will ensure your right to make your work freely and openly available." --Yerevantsi (talk) 17:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- File:Jews forced to march with star Kristallnacht (cropped).jpg
This file has no publication 70 years or earlier given, which is required by the license tag, and the source link is dead. Unlikely to be PD-US, because that would require publication by 70 years before the URAA date. Buidhe (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Stated author unknown but license tag says the author died 70 years ago. If anonymous, need valid publication (70 years ago) that would place it in the public domain in Germany. Also lacking PD-US rationale. Buidhe (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Stated author unknown but license tag states author died over 70 years ago. If anonymous, need publication over 70 years ago for PD-Germany. Also lacking PD-US rationale. One source link is dead and the other one does not state copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 18:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Stated author unknown but license tag states author died over 70 years ago. If anonymous, need publication over 70 years ago for PD-Germany. Also lacking PD-US rationale. One source link is dead and the other one does not state copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
The first 3 minutes are the same. The version on Commons are longer than the video on Flickr. MGA73 (talk) 20:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Question: Where is the alternate version video, as I see that there is only one video (which is this) in the category. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Don't ask me :-D --MGA73 (talk) 09:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Since the nominator cannot provide any duplicate evidence, there is no valid reason of deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
The first 3 minutes are the same. The version on Commons are longer than the video on Flickr. MGA73 (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Question: Where is the alternate version video, as I see that there is only one video (which is this) in the category. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Don't ask me :-D --MGA73 (talk) 09:33, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Since the nominator cannot provide any duplicate evidence, there is no valid reason of deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Is it not the other way around? Since we can’t Review the file then we can’t keep it? --MGA73 (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Наталя Макуховська (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtful to be own work given how old the photos are; PD claims unjustified since there is no indication of early enough publication to be PD
- File:Іван Шарий.jpg
- File:І.Лоський.jpg
- File:Іван Сорокевич.jpg
- File:В. Шульгин.jpg
- File:М.Ганкевич.jpg
- File:Микола Корпан.jpg
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Need publication at least 70 years ago for PD-Germany if this is an anonymous work. No PD-US rationale either. Source link dead. Buidhe (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Source link does not state copyright status. Need publication at least 70 years ago for PD-Germany, if this is an anonymous work. Also lacking PD-US rationale. Buidhe (talk) 23:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I checked the source pages which are (1) http://www.alemannia-judaica.de/eisenach_synagoge.htm and (2) https://www.jüdische-gemeinden.de/index.php/gemeinden/e-g/548-eisenach-thueringen. On (1) the source is named as "Brunner" who from the numerous references on the page appears to be Reinhold Brunner, the former head of the Eisenach Stadtarchiv (city archive). On (2) the image credit is hist. Aufn., Stadtarchiv, meaning "historical image, city archive" and it is marked as gemeinfrei, meaning no copyright restriction on use.
- Google image searches, including one with date restriction to before 2011, when the image was first uploaded to Wikipedia, indicate that (1) is where the image was first published. On that page the image description is that it is of the remains of the synagogue being blown up after it was burned down. Later image results -- other than (2) -- all refer to the image as of the synagogue "burning," again suggesting that (1) is the original source for the image.
- As the image is credited to the Eisenach city archive, which surely would have provided the name of the photographer, if known, PD-Germany seems appropriate to me. If others agree, I'll update the file with the two direct links and provide descriptions in en, fr and de.
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Besides nothing says the 2007 permission is longer valid. It seems not. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- This file is covered by ticket:2017081010002834, which doesn't explicitly address the copyright status of the model. It is unclear who created it, and if the ticket provides sufficient permission to keep it. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
As per User:Elcobbola/Models: models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. Official guideline with equivalent explanation here: Commons:TOYS. Arosio Stefano (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- However, "A toy model that is an exact replica of an automobile, airplane, train, or other useful article where no creative expression has been added to the existing design" is not eligible for copyright protection in the United States". — Yerpo Eh? 07:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: anyhow: now source for the original upload. --JuTa 20:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
No source. Any evidence it has been published one day and that it falls under 1992 law. Probably not public domain in the U.S.A. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- It was published here: https://www.swissinfo.ch/fre/multimedia/m%C3%A9diation_du-r%C3%A9armement-moral-%C3%A0-initiatives-et-changement/42240974. Pensées de Pascal (talk) 08:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I have found the copyright holder. They will give permission in a few days, stay tuned.Pensées de Pascal (talk) 09:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Per File:13-mottus---buchman2.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
No source. Any evidence it has been published one day and that it falls under 1992 law. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- This picture has been published many times, which makes it difficult to trace when was the first time. It was for instance published in the Arizona Daily Star of 22 March 1960 (see:https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/dr-frank-buchan-moral-rearmament-1806401692.) Pensées de Pascal (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- So it's not Switzerland. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't have the physical collection of MRA picturials of the time that would be needed to try and pinpoint the very 1st publication. However a proof of publication in Switzerland is this: https://www.swissinfo.ch/fre/politique/monde-en-crise_le-r%C3%A9armement-moral-un-fil-rouge-dans-l-histoire-suisse/42254956. Pensées de Pascal (talk) 08:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- 2016 is well after 1960 so the country of first publication is not Switzerland so you have to change the {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} template for a U.S. one. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't have the physical collection of MRA picturials of the time that would be needed to try and pinpoint the very 1st publication. However a proof of publication in Switzerland is this: https://www.swissinfo.ch/fre/politique/monde-en-crise_le-r%C3%A9armement-moral-un-fil-rouge-dans-l-histoire-suisse/42254956. Pensées de Pascal (talk) 08:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- So it's not Switzerland. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
No reason to be public domain in Germany yet. Permission from Frank Ebert needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't understand. It is from the German Government Archives. (http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/DeutscheEinheit/Fotoreihe/1989-10-02-mahnwache-gethsemanekirche.html). If the permission is not included this is a misundesstanding from my side. Pensées de Pascal (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: but its not a part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment as required by the license. --JuTa 20:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
"This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission." Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I have requested permission to the Michigan Daily. It is rather strange because it is a page of purely promotional material in which the Michigan Daily's journalists had no part. Do you think it made sense to make that request?Pensées de Pascal (talk) 21:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Pensées de Pascal: I haven't seen it was an add so, you're right, the Michigan Daily can't claim copyright on it so it's useless to contact them. Perhaps public domain in the U.S.A. due to its age... I recommend you to let an Administrator decide. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Thank you for your feedback. I have now found the appropriate copyright rule, which is that works published in the U.S. without a valid copyright notice before 1978 automatically fall into the public domain. This is promotional material entirely provided by MRA as a full-page ad. The copyright notice should then be {{PD-US-no-notice}}.Pensées de Pascal (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Pensées de Pascal: I haven't seen it was an add so, you're right, the Michigan Daily can't claim copyright on it so it's useless to contact them. Perhaps public domain in the U.S.A. due to its age... I recommend you to let an Administrator decide. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: and license changed. --JuTa 21:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yerevantsi (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence images are public domain in Armenia yet.
- File:Armin T. Wegner Vazgen I.jpg
- File:Sahinian.png
- File:Ambartsumian Vazgen I.png
- File:Viktor Ambartsumian.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Do you even care to look at the permission sections? I've added why they're PD. Do take a look. --Yerevantsi (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I made some tweaks and clarified the permissions for each of these images. --Yerevantsi (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Yerevantsi: The fact that echmiadzin.asj-oa.am trust their uploaders is one thing, another thing is that without even knowing their names it's impossible for us to verify they are indeed the copyright holders. Indeed copyright holders on books are generally the publisher and less often individuals and books are protected by copyright 70 years after publication in Armenia so 1968 or sooner isn't OK. Let's wait for an Administrator decision but I'm afraid claim by a third party (echmiadzin.asj-oa.am) won't be sufficient for Commons. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Etchmiadzin is the official publication of Armenian Apostolic Church. How is that a third-party source for photos related to the church? Two of the four photos here include Vazgen I, the head of the church. It's a direct source and most certainly the original source of those images. As for the two other photos, both Sahinian and Ambartsumian had ties with the church and those photos may have easily been published there first. There's no evidence for otherwise. --Yerevantsi (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Yerevantsi: echmiadzin.asj-oa.am is not the author; they host material posted by various users (it's explained in the template). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. It is the official host of the magazine. Here. This is the official website of the Armenian Church where there is a page on the magazine. armenianchurch.org. It links to a directory to the archives of the magazine hosted by the Armenian Academy of Sciences [9]. Whenever you choose a certain article like here [10] it redirects you to echmiadzin.asj-oa.am. Because that's where the articles are officially electronically published. --Yerevantsi (talk) 08:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- AND the website clearly states that ***all works published*** by Էջմիածին/Etchmiadzin fall under Attribution 2.5.--Yerevantsi (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Yerevantsi: echmiadzin.asj-oa.am is not the author; they host material posted by various users (it's explained in the template). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Etchmiadzin is the official publication of Armenian Apostolic Church. How is that a third-party source for photos related to the church? Two of the four photos here include Vazgen I, the head of the church. It's a direct source and most certainly the original source of those images. As for the two other photos, both Sahinian and Ambartsumian had ties with the church and those photos may have easily been published there first. There's no evidence for otherwise. --Yerevantsi (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Yerevantsi: The fact that echmiadzin.asj-oa.am trust their uploaders is one thing, another thing is that without even knowing their names it's impossible for us to verify they are indeed the copyright holders. Indeed copyright holders on books are generally the publisher and less often individuals and books are protected by copyright 70 years after publication in Armenia so 1968 or sooner isn't OK. Let's wait for an Administrator decision but I'm afraid claim by a third party (echmiadzin.asj-oa.am) won't be sufficient for Commons. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: CC-BY licnense and unknown author makes no sense. --JuTa 21:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JohnKreitzer (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://korepr.wordpress.com/clients/barry-goldwater-jr/, photos of photos, missing permission.
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment our version was uploaded in 2007 and according to TinEye the oldest web-version is from 2010. But there are versions online with a background that is not blanked out so that indicate that our version is an edited version. The question is if the uploaded on Wikipedia is the original photographer or if the original photo is licensed PD. I found no proof that the original photo is PD. Perhaps it came from http://www.barrymgoldwaterjr.com/barrgoldwaterjr.htm and the original uploaded edited the photo. --MGA73 (talk) 00:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)