Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(48332460202).jpg){kind=link}
_(15702377277).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
3d model of quinhydrone with incorrect structure, hydrogen atoms covalently bonded to two oxygen atoms. Wostr (talk) 03:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete, this indeed may cause some misunderstandings. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 04:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, with support of uploader. --DMacks (talk) 04:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no permission (No permission since) Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Reason for challenging: As stated in file's description, this file was derrived from File:Klimek.jpg. Sincerely, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- As stated now, but not at the moment of tagging. Sealle (talk) 11:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: sourced properly now. --Sealle (talk) 11:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
pas autoriser Farah Kindra (talk) 08:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 11:47, 9 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: © 2014 Studioregard. Propriétée exclusive de Studioregard. --Krdbot 14:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
en futuro del borrado el archivo: File:Arbiencio Vidiniencia China y Hong Kong.jpg
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- File:SEO Services Indore.jpg
- File:Best Digital Marketing Company in Indore.jpg
- File:SEO Company Indore India.jpg
- File:Hire Shopify Developers Indore India.jpg
- File:BigCommerce Developers Indore.jpg
- File:E-Commerce Development Company Indore.jpg
- File:Hire Mobile App Developers Indore.jpg
- File:Mobile App Design Development Company Indore.jpg
- File:Mobile App Design Service Indore.jpg
- File:Hire UIUX Designer Indore.jpg
- File:UX UI Design Consultancy Indore.jpg
- File:UI UX Design Company Indore.jpg
- File:Hire Web Developers India.jpg
- File:Web Development Agency Indore.jpg
- File:Web Development Services Indore.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant spam, user blocked indef. --Achim (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
I don't want my photo to be public anymore. RyuDeen (talk) 16:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Refers to image, f'up Commons:Deletion requests/File:IGN RyuDeen.jpg. --Achim (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
worse quality of File:Combined oral contraceptive pill (3).JPG Iruka13 (talk) 12:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
- Yes, its almost a duplicated file and could be a speedy deletion --Wilfredor (talk) 15:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
File:Торта Әубакірқызы и Қонысбай Әубакірұлы у мемориальной доски в Парламенте РК 3 августа 2004.jpg
[edit]
ошибка в отчестве на казахском языке Каныш Кайралапов (talk) 18:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:29, 10 Dezember 2019 UTC: ошибка в отчестве на казахском языке --Krdbot 13:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Thumbnail Picture of K Appavu pillai.jpg
- File:Thumbnail Picture of Hosur K. Appavu Pillai.jpg
- File:1991 State Assembly Election result.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
More historical images claimed as "own work", no proper attribution, source, and dates.
- File:R. Sivagnanam Pillai.png
- File:K.Rajaram with Indira Gandhi.jpg
- File:K A Manoharan.jpg
- File:K Rajaram.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Inappropriate licensing and attribution of source files. A.Savin 01:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Steinsplitter at 13:05, 15 Dezember 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Buildings in Addis Ababa --Krdbot 19:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Not used space-filling model of malic acid, there is something wrong with geometry of the hydroxy group, it seems to me that C-OH is planar with H atom attached to C at one side, not proper tetrahedral. Wostr (talk) 01:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Low quality, white background structure of malate dianion, cf. File:Malate Structural Formula V1.svg as an alt. image; not used. Wostr (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope and low quality Atomicdragon136 (talk) 03:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:11, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MURTUZ HÜSEYNOV (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Oyuncu Murtuz HÜSEYNOV .jpg
- File:SOSİYAL MEDİYA İNCELEMESİNDE.jpg
- File:Yönetmen MURTUZ HÜSEYNOV.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Đur Siu 81.jpg
- File:Lyzim Mlô.jpg
- File:Niê - Aliô .jpg
- File:Julia Aliô.jpg
- File:K - ICM.jpg
- File:Issac Thái .jpg
- File:Liphôn Gaga.jpg
- File:Liphôn Gaga .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised file. Advertisement? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
out of Project scope Iruka13 (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
out of scope 50.232.195.6 18:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope 50.232.195.6 19:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused montage without crediting source images; tiny images on huge canvas, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Melika taheri 10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Ali Sadeghi Iranian Actor1.png
- File:Ali Sadeghi Iranian Actor3.jpg
- File:Ali Sadeghi Iranian Actor2.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Nudity Image LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 22:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Nudity is no valid reason, but very low quality. We have enough better quality images of private parts. --Achim (talk) 11:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marie Morel is born in 1954. Copyright violation. 86.249.107.125 22:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:46, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unclear copyright status. Permission of Maria Martyniuk or Latishev Kirill required via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
http://slovoprosvity.org/2019/05/16/serhij-martynyuk-ya-ne-hrayu-v-hidnist-ya-zhyvu-z-hidnistyu/, Permission of Maria Martyniuk required via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyviol Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 23:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
More. Oratile 41.113.201.128 11:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
From the instagram account of en:Fahriye Evcen here, no evidence of acceptable license. Thuresson (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marferblanco (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#G10
- File:Tittre CISCO IT ESSENTIALS - Marta Fernández Blanco.jpg
- File:Marie Réparation ordinateur à Lattes.jpg
- File:Conseil de matériel informatique.jpg
- File:Dépannage Informatique Montpellier.jpg
- File:Catherine cours de informatique.jpg
- File:Cours d'informatique à Montpellier.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Inappropriate LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 01:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
_(48332460202).jpg){kind=link}
_(48332460202).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not a bad image but if it is taking up server space, here is two issues that should be addressed by the photographer. Resolution is below 2 MB and given the resolution of the camera, it should be much higher (suggest 6 MB or higher). Also, there is a personal watermark on the image that needs to be removed. GRDN711 (talk) 02:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
_(48332460202).jpg){kind=link}
- server space is not an issue. The image is sharp where it matters, so 2M or 5M does not matter. This is not an super quality nomination, but a deletion request.Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is good enough, watermark can still be removed. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
_(48332460202).jpg){kind=link}
Unused logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. 2601:983:827F:3080:91A0:C8E5:3EF6:C893 13:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. 2601:983:827F:3080:91A0:C8E5:3EF6:C893 13:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I want to post it under Jami Ul Alfar Mosque and this picture is not my own work. Ayshaahmeddd (talk) 01:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ablution Area.jpg. --Amada44 talk to me 10:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
I want to post this under Jami ul aldar mosque not here. Ayshaahmeddd (talk) 01:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Did you mean that you wanted to rename this? I will contact you via email for more context. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- This needs to be closed - the student was confused on how to make the image appear on Wikipedia, so they thought they needed to upload it there instead of here, in order for the image to be usable on Wikipedia. They don't want the image deleted. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Shalor. --Amada44 talk to me 10:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vrundavan gopi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per username correlation with images and half of the images' description pages, these are all promotion for the uploader's blog or organization/place.
- File:Vrundavan Radha Krishna 03.JPG
- File:Vrundavan Radha Krishna 01.JPG
- File:Vrundavan Radha Krishna 02.JPG
- File:Radharamana.JPG
- File:Radhakrishna Darshan at Vrundavan.JPG
- File:Radhakrishna at Bangalore.JPG
DMacks (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The images themselves are not promotional and have been on commons since 2012 and some are in use. I have removed the promotional text and links to the homepage. --Amada44 talk to me 10:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Photo of a photo, no permission Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Amada44 talk to me 09:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio I think. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:45, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
This is my body taken with my camera you won't dind it anywhere else; author danigre
Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 18:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Nudity image LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- I oppose deletion. But it should be renamed. --Sharouser (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Low quality unused penis picture. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Same image has been now uploaded to (and from) Flickr to relieve the pressure on OTRS volunteers so this can now be deleted Mramoeba (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 08:26, 9 Januar 2020 UTC: No OTRS permission since 29 December 2019 --Krdbot 13:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Who are you?.jpg
Files uploaded by TylerHndxx (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Tyler Hendrix Twitter.jpg
- File:Bet Plus Tyler Hendrix.jpg
- File:Tyler Hendrix zina Star.jpg
- File:Tyler Hendrix reporter.jpg
- File:Tyler Hendrix reporter 2.jpg
- File:Tyler Hendrix Remiah Rudolph.jpg
- File:Tyler Hendrix and Remiah Rudolph.jpg
- File:RAW Tyler Hendrix.jpg
- File:Dvisuals Hendrix.jpg
- File:Flex Hendrix sprite.jpg
- File:Dwntwn (Prod. By Tyler Hendrix).jpg
- File:All State Tyler Hendrix.jpg
- File:Hendrix tape.jpg
- File:TylerHNDXX.png
- File:Sprite Tyler Hendrix.jpg
- File:Sprite Hendrix.jpg
- File:Tyler Hendrix Sprite.jpg
- File:Hendrix BET plus.jpg
- File:Tyler Hendrix.jpg
- File:Hacked by nature tyler Hendrix.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+some copyright issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Toy Ship and Sailors incategory:"All media needing categories as of 2016"
[edit]Free on Flickr but not free per COM:TOYS
- File:Toy Ship and Sailors for Armed Forces Day MOD 45158535.jpg
- File:Toy Ship and Sailors for Armed Forces Day MOD 45158536.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Professor Yang with the first cloned calf in North America, Amy, and her donor, Aspen, in 1999..jpg
[edit]
Credited to Peter Morenus here https://magazine.uconn.edu/2018/02/12/remember-jerry-amy/# - the claim of own work is dubious without meaningful exif Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
NoFop in France. Architect is Mario Botta Poudou99 (talk) 14:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
NoFop in France. Architect is Mario Botta Poudou99 (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nooberella (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW, historical images claimed as "own work", missing proper source/date/author.
- File:Old Haghartsin11.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin8.jpg
- File:Haghartsin13.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin10.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin9.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin6.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin7.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin5.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin4.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin3.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin2.jpg
- File:Old Haghartsin1.jpg
- File:Haghartsin11.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello dear P199, all this images is photographed by me. Besides last photo (File:Haghartsin11.jpg), other photos i have photographed form board (for example you can see in this photo in above). And this photo is created by me (not photographed from board) and that is really my work. :) Thanks.--Nooberella (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Nooberella: Taking photographs of existing photos is called derivative works. You can't claim these as own works, but need attribution to the original photographer, date, and location, to determine proper copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @P199: , okey but File:Haghartsin11.jpg is created by me.--Nooberella (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, excepted the one that is a photo taken by the uploader. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO in my opinion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete unless there is some kind of clear evidence the uploader owns the copyright. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 05:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
_(15702377277).jpg){kind=link}
_(15702377277).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately, resolution is low; subject is not sharp; there are many better images of this bird species and there is a personal watermark on the image. GRDN711 (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
_(15702377277).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
_(15702377277).jpg){kind=link}
Not a free file, this is a screen shot taken from a Florida short film series Libramedia (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
actually taken from [1] no evidence of permisssion Beeblebrox (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amal Sudarsanan S (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
non free ChongDae (talk) 09:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Small size restricts educational use. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
en:Draft:Zeus (company) was rejected thrice and deleted. The photo is out of project scope as advertizing of non-notable company. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
bad quality (totally out of focus), low resolution, can be replaced by file:Zbigniew Bialas 2019.jpg Gower (talk) 11:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Milan Madhav Das (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Kumud Arya's sketch by Milan Madhav Das.jpg
- File:Garima's sketch by Milan Madhav Das.jpg
- File:VMP2019 Milan Madhav Das at Vrajamandala Parikrama.jpg
- File:Monidipa Ghosh's sketch by Milan Madhav Das.jpg
- File:TimesLitFest Milan Madhav Das with William Dalrympale.jpg
- File:Bob Dylan Sketch by Milan Madhav Das.jpg
- File:FRD8A- Quotes by Milan Madhav Das.jpg
- File:VIHE 101- Milan Madhav Das, ISKCON Vrindavan.jpg
- File:American Library New Delhi - Milan Madhav Das (Patron).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Apocalyptic Lamb from Sant Climent de Taüll - Google Art Project.jpg - better quality Iruka13 (talk) 12:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
copy of File:Pdgd.jpg Iruka13 (talk) 12:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate of File:Emergency contraception 1 pill.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
It is a copyrighted photo Jubair1985 (talk) 14:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Banzer03.jpg
- File:Adnbanzer.jpg
- File:Silesvargas.jpg
- File:Banzerpinochet.jpg
- File:Gasbanzer.jpg
- File:Banzer02.jpg
- File:Gral Banzer01.jpg
- File:Gral. René Barrientos Ortuño.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrea Briguglio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical and official photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Filippo Oneri.jpg
- File:Danilo Lo Giudice .jpg
- File:On.Dott.Cateno Roberto De Luca.jpg
- File:Dott.Antonino La Mattina.jpg
- File:Avv.Carlo Umberto Lo Schiavo.jpg
- File:Dott.Angelo Greco.jpg
- File:Dott.Alberto Alfio Carmelo Morabito.jpg
- File:Dott.Antonino Salvatore Bartolotta .jpg
- File:Dott.Antonino Muscolino.jpg
- File:Dott.Onofrio Zaccone.jpg
- File:Avv.Pinella Luisa Aliberti.jpg
- File:Dott.Gaetano Mistretta.jpg
- File:Cav. Francesco Rigano.jpg
- File:Avv.Salvatore Aliberti.jpg
- File:Avv. Carmelo Iaria.jpg
- File:Dott.Giuseppe Valguarnera.jpg
- File:Prof. Giuseppe Caminiti.jpg
- File:Comm. Angelo Trimarchi.jpg
- File:Ing. Giuseppe Trimarchi .jpg
- File:Avv. Luigi Ragno .jpg
- File:Cav.Vittorio Caminiti.jpg
- File:Avv.Michele Crisafulli Mondio.jpg
- File:Cav.Uff. Francesco Paolo Caminiti.jpg
- File:Giuseppe Caminiti.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have provided not a correct lycence! These are old! I have corrected these now. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can't use PD-old when the author is unknown. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
I don't want my photo to be public anymore. RyuDeen (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 18:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Not enough evidence of own work, user with history of copyright violations Frodar (talk) 21:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
From the Instagram account of en:Fahriye Evcen here, no evidence of acceptable license. Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MegaAguirre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (en:David E. Tolchinsky, en:David Tolchinsky).
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Patrick Rogel, I believe File:David tolchinsky headshot3.jpg would be useful to illustrate David Tolchinsky's biography on Wikipedia. (With the addition of appropriate categories) Does that address your concern that the image is out of scope? Respectfully, Cassiville (talk) 01:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Cassiville: David E. Tolchinsky's Wikipedia page has been deleted by community consensus in April and is has been recreated (by you?) without permission a month ago. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: , From my understanding of the deletion discussion in April, the page was deleted for its promotional tone and links to personal websites. I believed that if those concerns were addressed in an unidentical draft that the page would meet requirements. Would you mind pointing me toward the process for requesting such permission so that I may do so if it’s ever relevant for the future? Cassiville (talk) 16:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Cassiville: en:David Tolchinsky has been deleted today so image of him is still out of COM:SCOPE. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: , From my understanding of the deletion discussion in April, the page was deleted for its promotional tone and links to personal websites. I believed that if those concerns were addressed in an unidentical draft that the page would meet requirements. Would you mind pointing me toward the process for requesting such permission so that I may do so if it’s ever relevant for the future? Cassiville (talk) 16:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Cassiville: David E. Tolchinsky's Wikipedia page has been deleted by community consensus in April and is has been recreated (by you?) without permission a month ago. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect license LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 22:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Uritzky-square-general-view-design-sketch-for-the-celebration-of-the-first-anniversary-of-1918.jpg
[edit]
Artist died in 1970, so not PD in source country until 70 years p.m.a. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Image may have been taken from the Internet. JalenFolf (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found using Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
better version is on commons Brookford (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redireted to File:Portrait de Jean-Baptiste VAN DIEVOET (1775-1862)(1856).png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
(1856).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
better version is on commons Brookford (talk) 08:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected to File:Dos du portrait de JB VAN DIEVOET (1775-1862).png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
newer version available Brookford (talk) 08:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected to File:Dos du portrait de JB VAN DIEVOET (1775-1862).png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
newer version available Brookford (talk) 08:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redireted to File:Portrait de Jean-Baptiste VAN DIEVOET (1775-1862)(1856).png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious license stating that Astrid Kragh is the author, which seems highly unlikely. Picture found on the internet, https://www.facebook.com/mandecentret.dk/photos/a.10151134070140865/10157048134905865/?type=3&theater Pugilist (talk) 10:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
J'ai publié une photo qui n'est pas ma propriété par erreur, il faut la supprimer afin qu'elle ne soit pas diffusé Djameltatah (talk) 10:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
J'ai publié une photo qui n'est pas ma propriété par erreur Djameltatah (talk) 10:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate Tonallimunoz (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:GCMHUNESCO.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate Tonallimunoz (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unneeded crop of File:Las Ventanas.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate Tonallimunoz (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: credited to Rodrigo Ruíz, copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate Tonallimunoz (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio, unreliable uploader, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tonallimunoz. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
incorrect location Baby Black Mirror (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France. Famous architect Jean Nouvel is still alive. Culex (talk) 07:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
NoFop in France. Recent pagod Poudou99 (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caroline Maybach (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from toys.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mitchslimani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Facebook EXIF data. --ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Licensed by CC-SA 4.0, but Twitter images are not freely licensed by default, and there is no proof that this one is freely licensed as there is not indication on the user's page. Willsome429 (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Licensed by CC-SA 4.0, but Instagram photos by default are not freely licensed and there is no indication on the user's page or in the caption that this one is freely licensed. Willsome429 (talk) 18:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. We need information on when these statues and other objects were created, by whom, and whether the sculptor(s) is/are dead or alive.
- File:Calatagan,Batangasjf0480 14.JPG
- File:Calatagan,Batangasjf0480 15.JPG
- File:Calatagan,Batangasjf0480 16.JPG
- File:Calatagan,Batangasjf0480 17.JPG
- File:Calatagan,Batangasjf0480 18.JPG
- File:Calatagan,Batangasjf0480 19.JPG
- File:Calatagan,Batangasjf0480 20.JPG
File:CalataganHall,Plaza,Batangasjf0546 02.JPG--
Keep. No statue or any copyrightable elements visible. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)- File:CalataganHall,Plaza,Batangasjf0546 05.JPG
- File:CalataganHall,Plaza,Batangasjf0546 06.JPG
File:CalataganHall,Plaza,Batangasjf0546 07.JPG-- Keep. No statue or any copyrightable elements visible. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)File:CalataganHall,Plaza,Batangasjf0546 08.JPG-- Keep. No statue or any copyrightable elements visible. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)File:CalataganHall,Plaza,Batangasjf0546 09.JPG-- Keep. No statue or any copyrightable elements visible. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)File:CalataganHall,Plaza,Batangasjf0546 10.JPG-- Keep. No statue or any copyrightable elements visible. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 02.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 03.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 04.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 05.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 06.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 07.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 08.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 09.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 10.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 11.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 12.JPG
- File:CalataganHanciendaPlaza,Batangasjf0453 16.JPG
Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn five files per User:P199. -Green Giant (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
As the uploader mentioned in the file's details, she got the picture - not took it herself. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Look like low-quality screengrabs, no reason to believe these are own works, unreliable uploader.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate Tonallimunoz (talk) 15:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Tonallimunoz, of which file is this a duplicate? GFJ (talk) 09:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No evidence of duplication provided. --Green Giant (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 223.62.188.65 00:28, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 211.248.183.181 01:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 02:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Túrelio: , You said "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless", I don't agree for the reasoning since there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. also, as I said in previous DR, this video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope), not privacy things. also it has archived pagehtml code of license info (cc license is irrevocable)Puramyun31 (talk) 12:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- I don't understand that the claimant wants it deleted for privacy issues. And a CC license (as any other) is only irrevocable if it had been legitimate. As I understand it, the latter is disputed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Túrelio: the claimant seems not a videographer of the video, but seems the depicted person. your comment "stripped of its sound-track, is useless" That seems nonsense, there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope (not such as a simple selfie video)). Puramyun31 (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Is it copyvio? No, licence been verified.
- Is it out of scope? No, it shows a beauty pageant.
- So the remaining question is, whether Commons should delete the video because the (alleged) subject depicted wants it deleted.--Roy17 (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17, as I stated above: AFAIK, the license on YT has not been verified, but just recorded. We have scores of uploads from Flickr with at-time-of-upload recorded CC license, which we nevertheless deleted, after we found that the Flickr-user had wrongfully claimed a free license for not-own images. --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Roy17:
- 1.In this case Cocoviking (a videography studio which has a official youtube account, this video is from the account, this site has a link to a video of the Cocoviking's youtube account), so it's not a fake account.
- 2. As i mentioned at previous DR, the video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition), so the "remaining question" as you said it's not a valid reason for DR. The user who opened the DR is blocked because of legal threat Puramyun31 (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: then have you watched the video before commenting? What say the watermarks on the video? Have you also checked https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCqEWp27zVFQqeYBKqjWq5A/videos to see whether the youtube account is violating copyright?--Roy17 (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep If the YT video was deleted and the uploading YT account was not blocked, I think that deletion reason was unrelated to copyvio. Ankry (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- This does not appear to be a copyright issue as the nomination claims, but a personality rights issue. That page doesn't say much for South Korea specifically, so it is unclear to what extent permission is needed. Personality rights was discussed slightly on my talk page previously at User talk:Explicit/Archive 1#Question on public photograpy in South Korea. There are apparent exceptions, but again, we don't have any information on that. However, MuscleMania at least appears to be broadcast online by MAXQ on YouTube and Naver TV. Not to mention all the press photos. Don't you kind of have to... waive your personality rights to compete in this event to begin with? ƏXPLICIT 09:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Explicit: As per this page, the mention related your question exists on Commons already. and per this page related to the issue (2013가합32048) South Korea does not against photos/videos of celebrities, like other countries over the world. also the page linked by you mainly focused privacy matter, so for files depicts usual public activity like this video we don't have to seek the saying for South Korea specifically. Furthermore, "non-copyright related restrictions are not considered relevant to the freedom requirements of Commons or by Wikimedia". Puramyun31 (talk) 11:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Video was published under a free license on YouTube. Ruthven (msg) 20:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 223.62.162.83 05:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
i am the model in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 223.62.188.65 00:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Dont make me upset.
i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 211.248.183.181 01:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Original video is gone from YouTube; per nominator the YouTube uploader lacked permission. YouTube upload may have been under a false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: whether "Original video is gone from YouTube" or not is not necessarily related to the Validity of CC license (cc license is irrevocable). there are archived infomations of the source and cc-license info. ( archived pagehtml code of license info) the video seems to taken by Cocoviking so the cc license is not false, as per other its videos. the ip user's claim doesn't seem to be related to CC license of the video (doesn't seem author of the video so 211.248.183.181 can't claim its copyright) but seems to be related to personality of the depicted people (211.248.183.181 said it's "model" in the video, not "author" of the video) (Non-copyright restriction), However there is no problem of the issue as per above (this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things...) Puramyun31 (talk) 14:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete unless the dubbed in music in the sound track can be shown to be free licensed; apparent copyright violation through derivative work. (This is regardless of other potential problems in the deletion request.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: I uploaded sound removed-version of File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm. also as i said above, this video depicts usual public contest event, not privacy things. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- The sound is intact in the linked nominated video. Regardless of whether or not you uploaded a different silent version, this version with sound should be deleted as a copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: oops I reuploaded as overwriting, upload error occurred. so I reuploaded as file:머슬마니아 함슬옹 (1).webm instead. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: the overwriting error of this video File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm is fixed. sound-removed version now. sound removed version is Keep per as i said above. sound-included version uploaded was an unintentional mistake. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: the overwriting error of this video File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm is fixed. sound-removed version now. sound removed version is
- @Infrogmation: oops I reuploaded as overwriting, upload error occurred. so I reuploaded as file:머슬마니아 함슬옹 (1).webm instead. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
p.s.: The ip user added apparently threatening comment which contains offensive words at my talk page. (you must be "crazy"...) If such comments are added repetitively at the pages related this discussion, the comments can be considered a legal threat. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: the version without sound. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment If there is legal reason this must be deleted, please email details per Commons:OTRS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Discussion on deletion of this image is still open. No need to repeat the same information. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 03:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: , You said "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless", I don't agree for the reasoning since there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. also, as I said in previous DR, this video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition), not privacy things. also it has archived pagehtml code of license info (cc license is irrevocable) Puramyun31 (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Video was removed from YouTube, an no way to check the license (neither on the archived versions). Ruthven (msg) 20:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Text and images copyrighted ~riley (talk) 04:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The license is wrong. But if this is an 1891 publication, as the file name suggests, it might be in the public domain. The scanned book pages do look like a late 19th century work. But more information on the source, author and date of publication is needed., even for {{PD-old-assumed}}. The image of the "mechanical bird" which seems to be the point of the scan is signed with "L. Bienfait" in the lower right corner, but I couldn't quickly find an illustrator of that name. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment File:Oiseau mécanique 1891.jpg is the key image of the spread seen here. Many uploads from User:TrouvéInventor seem to be scans from similar-aged sources inappropriately identified solely as "own work" (rather than with underlying-original info). DMacks (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: from Traité d'Aérostation, published 1891. Ruthven (msg) 20:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florentin27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical newspapers and book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Le reveil basque de 1918.jpg
- File:Antonio Maria Cadolini.png
- File:Anthitea revue historique en 1973.jpg
- File:Le mousquetaire journal royaliste legitimiste de l'entre deux guerre.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florentin27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts, diagrams and trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Logo de l'eure agricole et rural (journal d'information).png
- File:Le reveil de neufchatel logo.png
- File:Representation graphique spatiale de la suite de stern par representation de surface relative.png
- File:Representation graphique relatif radiale de la suite de stern.png
- File:Diagramme en bule de la suite de stern representé sous forme de résultat relatif.png
- File:Histogramme empilée relatif des résultat de la suite de Stern.png
- File:Diagramme en contour de la suite de stern.png
- File:Répartion par iles des habitant des iles feroe.png
- File:Aire urbaine bas normande en 1982.png
- File:Representation graphique en histogramme si la suite de brujin si n=7.png
- File:Representation graphique en courbe de la suite de brujn si n=7.png
- File:Representation graphique radial de la suite de brujn si n=7.png
- File:Representation en histogramme de la suite de bujin si n=3.png
- File:Representation graphique en courbe de la suite de brujn si =3.png
- File:Representation graphique radiale de la suite de brujn si n=3.png
- File:Nombre d'enfant autiste scolarisé en primaire par pays et par pourcentage d'un classe d'age des pays occidentaux francophone.png
- File:Suite de kolakoski.png
- File:Suite de kolakovski.png
- File:Suite de fibanacci 2.png
- File:Suite de fibanacci.png
- File:Suite de farinacci representation graphique des resultats.png
- File:La documentation française par sujet traité dans le dossier.png
- File:Franciscain séculier sur le réseaux social facebook issus de la custodie France Belgique.png
- File:Type d'enseignement specialisé à Croydon.png
- File:Type d'enseignement secondaire à Croydon.png
- File:Type d'enseignement d'application à croydon.png
- File:Le poids de l'enseignement specialisé publique selon une representation finaire.png
- File:Le poids de l'enseignement secondaire publique selon une representation finaire.png
- File:Le poids de l'enseignement publique primaire selon une representation finaire.png
- File:Le poids de l'enseignement privé primaire selon une representation finaire.png
- File:Le poids de l'enseignement d'aplication publique selon une representation finaire.png
- File:Ecole publique de croydon par niveaux.png
- File:École publique à croydon.png
- File:Ecole privé de croydon.png
- File:École privée à croydon.png
- File:École primaire par type d'enseignement à croydon.png
- File:Fiance chretienne allemande nombre d'etablissement bancaires.png
- File:Finance chretienne allemande.png
- File:Finance chretienne allemande nombre d'etablissement bancaire.png
- File:Le mot dans les livres poetiques de la bible sous forme de diagramme en baton.png
- File:Le mot paix dans les livres poetiques de la bible sous forme de diagramme circulaire.png
- File:Le mot paix dans les livres historique de la bible sous forme de diagramme circulaire.png
- File:Le mot dans les livres historiques de la bible sous formes de diagramme en baton.png
- File:Le mots paix dans le pentateuque en forme de diagramme en barre.png
- File:Le mot paix dans le pentateuque sous forme de diagramme circulaire.png
- File:Diagramme en baton sur le mot paix dans les quatres evangiles canoniques.png
- File:Le mot paix dans les quatres evangiles canoniques.png
- File:Le don de force dans le pentateuque.png
- File:Le mots sagesse dans l'ancien testaments par corpus de livre.png
- File:Le mot hypocrisie dans le nouveau testaments.png
- File:Le mot charité dans le nouveau testaments par auteur.png
- File:Annalyse de l'oeuvre de Jean Richepin selon un diagramme en ligne.png
- File:Jean Richepin analyse graphique d'oeuvre selon un diagramme circulaire.png
- File:Filmographie de brigitte bardot en diagramme circulaire.png
- File:Analyse de la filomographie environentale par evolution en courbe.png
- File:Analyse de la filomographie environentale par répartion en diagramme circulaire.png
- File:Analyse de la filmographie environemental par diagramme en baton.png
- File:Canonisation par pape depuis 1878 Vatican I en diagramme circulaire.png
- File:Evolution du nombre de femmes comme récipiandaire du prix des neiges en fonction des décenies.png
- File:Evolution du nombre de femme comme récipiandaire du prix des neige en fonction des décenies.png
- File:Recipiandaire du prix des neiges par répartion en diagramme en barre homme femme.png
- File:Repartion en diagramme circulair du prix des neiges selon la variable homme femme.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep the following files:
- File:Representation graphique spatiale de la suite de stern par representation de surface relative.png
- File:Representation graphique relatif radiale de la suite de stern.png
- File:Diagramme en bule de la suite de stern representé sous forme de résultat relatif.png
- File:Histogramme empilée relatif des résultat de la suite de Stern.png
- File:Diagramme en contour de la suite de stern.png
There is a page fr:Suite diatomique de Stern to which they may be relevant (the latter file is even in use there); a brief English equivalent is found at en:Stern's diatomic series. The images seem to display some statistical results about 10 different Stern series; however, due to the poor description texts, I couldn't fully validate this hypothesis. I suggest to keep them, for now. As for the remaining files, I didn't look at them, so I don't have an opinion. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete the following files:
- File:Representation graphique en histogramme si la suite de brujin si n=7.png
- File:Representation graphique en courbe de la suite de brujn si n=7.png
- File:Representation graphique radial de la suite de brujn si n=7.png
- File:Representation en histogramme de la suite de bujin si n=3.png (meanwhile moved to File:Representation en histogramme de la suite de Bruijn si n=3.png)
- File:Representation graphique en courbe de la suite de brujn si =3.png
- File:Representation graphique radiale de la suite de brujn si n=3.png
They appear to refer to en:De Bruijn sequence, but the name is misspelled in all file names and within all images. New versions that fix these issues would presumably relevant. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep File:Suite de kolakoski.png, see en:Kolakoski sequence
Delete File:Suite de kolakovski.png, seems to be a duplicate of the previous, with misspelled name in file name and image
Keep File:Suite de fibanacci 2.png, seems to depict the en:Fibonacci Sequence
Delete File:Suite de fibanacci.png, seems to be a precursor of the previous, with the 14th value wrong
Delete File:Suite de farinacci representation graphique des resultats.png, seems to be identical to the previous, except for misspelled name in file name and image - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Info Diagramme en contour de la suite de stern.png is in use. --Fæ (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept the ones pointed out in the discussion. Ruthven (msg) 21:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florentin27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unsourced (undoubtedly external source) and undated graphics, specific to native figures to a medium-sized French town (Évreux), without clear and precise description, difficult to understand for the most part, abundant spelling and/or grammar errors in graphics, titles and descriptions: very limited interest. "If kept, will therefore require a minimum of enormous work to correct faults for almost all files". Same problem for most other uploaded graphics.
- File:Personnalités natifs d'Evreux selon un diagramme en bâton cumulée à un diagramme en barre.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d'Evreux selon un diagramme en bâton cumulée à un diagramme en radar.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d'Evreux selon un diagramme en bâton.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d'Evreux selon un double diagramme en anneaux.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d'Evreux selon un diagramme circulaire exprimée en pourcentage d’après un classement catégorielle.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de double diagramme circulaire et en bâton exprimée en valeur relative exprimées en pourcentages.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme circulaire exprimée en valeur relative exprimées en pourcentages.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de double diagramme circulaire exprimée en valeur relative exprimées en pourcentages.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme circulaire exprimée en valeur absolue.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme de comparaison en radar et bâton plain.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme de comparaison en radar et bâton.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme de comparaison en courbe apparente et barre.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme de comparaison en courbe plaine et barre.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en double courbe apparente.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en double bâton et courbe apparente.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en double courbe triangulaire.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en double courbe cumulé relatif exprimée en pourcentage.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en bâton cumulé.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en courbe relief triangulaire.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en courbe sinusoidale.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme corrélé de courbe plaine et de diagramme en bâton.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en bulle en relief.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en bulle.png
- File:Les personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en aire cumulé en relief empilé rectangulaire.png
- File:Les personnalités natif d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en aire cumulé en relief empilé.png
- File:Les personnalités natif d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en aire cumulé en relief.png
- File:Les personnalités natif d’Évreux sous forme de diagramme en bande apparente.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de représentation en diagramme relatif en bande exprimé en pourcentage.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de représentation en diagramme relatif cumulé en valeur absolue.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de représentation en diagramme relatif juxtaposé exprimé en pourcentage.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de représentation en diagramme en radar plain.png
- File:Personnalités natif d’Évreux sous forme de représentation en diagramme circulaire juxtaposé en donné relative.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d’Évreux sous forme de représentation en diagramme circulaire juxtaposé en donné absolue numérique.png
- File:Personnalités natifs d’Évreux par effectif en diagramme en barre.png
- File:Les personalités d'Evreux par catégorie sous une forme de répresentation en fréquence cumulé absolue.png
- File:Les personalités d'Evreux par catégorie sous une forme de répresentation en anneau double.png
- File:Les personalités d'Evreux par catégorie sous une forme de répresentation en diagramme en rayon.png
- File:Les personalités d'Evreux par catégorie sous une forme de répresentation en diagramme en relief.png
- File:Les personalités d'Evreux par catégorie sous une forme de répresentation en diagramme en ere plaine.png
- File:Les personalités d'Evreux par catégorie sous une forme de répresentation en diagramme en barre.png
- File:Les personalités d'Evreux par catégorie sous une forme de répresentation en diagramme en radar de contour.png
- File:Représention sous forme de diagramme circulaire des personalitées natifs d'Evreux.png
Cjp24 (talk) 14:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
appeal to "speedy deletion" mark Skfd (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Not correct undo template delete. Autor - Yaroslav Bugaev. No Permission. See Commons:Licensing. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no permission to date. Ruthven (msg) 21:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted photograph. 86.249.114.86 18:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: © Maison Parisienne. Ruthven (msg) 21:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Image is of low quality with questionable educational value. Also looks like a reproduction of another work. Wcam (talk) 20:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Used in several Wikimedia projects. Thuresson (talk) 12:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
This also looks like a photo of a drawing, and is likely a derivative work of non-free work. --Wcam (talk) 22:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 21:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality sketch, superseded by File:Nintendo Switch Lite representation.png. No longer used in any Wikipedia projects, has been replaced by the higher-quality photo in question. Zxcvbnm (talk) 11:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. The depicted person cannot be an author of the photograph. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution file. Clear copyright violation. No metadata. This file is extracted from a video which is posted on youtube. The video was a kind of live telecast/recording of a programme. The video has no information about the original copyright holder of the recording. No information about camera man/ copyright holder of recording. So this is a clear copyright violation of the original uploader. Also there is good chance to get a good photo of this living person with no violation or without a doubt of violation. So strongly support to delete this file from commons. Ranjithsiji (talk) 03:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 21:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eatcha as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: video removed from youtube
@Eatcha: video/account may have been removed because of the music. Video did have a free license, see archived version. Pinging @4nn1l2, Hanooz. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Amateur filming from a live performance, probably by an audience. I think we can keep a muted version of this video unless someone finds an older version somewhere else. Hanooz 18:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- I already muted it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Youtube doesn't care about copyrighted music in videos, they just divert the profit. But https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMv47KMIn0C7eeXfKKRUAuA/about?disable_polymer=1&spfreload=10 States that guy was a serial copyright violator. --Eatcha (talk) 02:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Eatcha: YouTube politics are complicated. If you have a channel, I could probably take it down. All I'd have to do is file some complaints. YouTube will only demonitize or divert profit for rights holders who have an agreement with YouTube. But there are also many examples of videos that were taken down to suppress free speech. If whoever has the rights for this music went straight to a DMCA claim, the account could be terminated after three strikes. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Youtube doesn't care about copyrighted music in videos, they just divert the profit. But https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMv47KMIn0C7eeXfKKRUAuA/about?disable_polymer=1&spfreload=10 States that guy was a serial copyright violator. --Eatcha (talk) 02:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- I already muted it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I don't have source(not really interested in this video BTW), we should wait for DMCA if it ever gets filed. -- Eatcha (talk) 05:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Enjoyed the Arabic (Syrian) music,
but regrettably. The source has been deleted and the channel has been suspended due to copyright violation (maybe the footage itself is a copyright violation too). The muted video seems out of scope to me. Its quality is poor. Commons has better pictures of Rouwaida Attieh, so the video is not even useful for extracting some decent still images of her. If I was sure the video had been recorded in Syria in 2017 during a bloody civil war, I would say "keep", but I could not see any indications that this video had been recorded in Syria. I think putting the file on Category:Videos of 2017 from Syria is just a guesswork by User:Rafic.Mufid. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC) Delete
- @4nn1l2: Fair enough, though I do want to say that having a moving picture of a person is useful. It can show aspects of a person that a photo can't. Imagine we'd have videos of historical people instead of just photos. As a rather vivid and disturbing example, compare photos of Hitler to videos of him speeching. No photo could ever capture that horror. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think Rouwaida Attieh is comparable to Hitler in terms of importance. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- She isn't, I just used that as a particularly clear example. Donald Trump's voice could be another example. Stephen Hawking's lack of motion (which can't be seen a photograph) would be another. I think from a historical perspective, it will always add value. I would be quite interested to see, say, moving images of Napoleon. These are all historically more important, but the same is true for anyone. I wouldn't want to be limited to stills of the Backstreet Boys. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- OK, Alexis Jazz. I struck my delete vote, but I won't cast a keep vote. Now, I am
Neutral. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- OK, Alexis Jazz. I struck my delete vote, but I won't cast a keep vote. Now, I am
- She isn't, I just used that as a particularly clear example. Donald Trump's voice could be another example. Stephen Hawking's lack of motion (which can't be seen a photograph) would be another. I think from a historical perspective, it will always add value. I would be quite interested to see, say, moving images of Napoleon. These are all historically more important, but the same is true for anyone. I wouldn't want to be limited to stills of the Backstreet Boys. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think Rouwaida Attieh is comparable to Hitler in terms of importance. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: Fair enough, though I do want to say that having a moving picture of a person is useful. It can show aspects of a person that a photo can't. Imagine we'd have videos of historical people instead of just photos. As a rather vivid and disturbing example, compare photos of Hitler to videos of him speeching. No photo could ever capture that horror. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Licensed under CC-SA 4.0, but the webpage on which the image was originally housed (https://www.bradnphotography.com/gallery/caraway-4719), says, at the bottom of the page, "All Rights Reserved", leaving me to believe that this is a case of mislicensing and that the material is not in the public domain nor freely licensed and therefore should not be on Commons. Willsome429 (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, source image given is different too.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of Creative Commons license as uploaded - copyrighted logo - starting discussion for consensus on whether it can be converted to {{PD-Textlogo}}. I think it's possibly ok, and I was just going to convert it, but then I wondered about the gradient/shading and thought it best to ask for second opinion(s). Thanks. Begoon 06:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, and move to English Wikipedia, per COM:TOO UK, the company HQ is in the UK according to WP article.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly a copyrighted logo; a copy on the English Wikipedia already exists and is correctly marked as fair use. --odder (talk) 21:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
A website screenshot, no evidence of free license. Sealle (talk) 10:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Sealle: It comes from skwiki, as indicated in file title. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation GeoO (talk) 11:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
I received a deletion request by the owner of the tents and the Christmas tree. He says I didn't ask for his consent to take and publish this picture, and he is right. Moreover, there's a trademark on the right tent, and the background is a part of the Bastille Opera which is under copyright. For all these reasons, I request the deletion of this file.
Vassil (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Also concerns File:SDF Sapin de Noel Paris 27 12 2012 2.jpg. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 19:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Krd 16:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no permission (No permission since) Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Explanation for challenging: The background T-Shirt can be distributed under PD-shape. The Wikiconference design is copyrighted by Wikimedia Czech Republic, given it was authored by Klára Scholleová, who was hired by WMCZ to do the work. As a WMCZ regular member, I can confirm WMCZ's intention is to release it under Creative Commons. Should you require official letter signed by our director and processed by OTRS, let me know, but I don't think that's necessary. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
In addition to the above, how is this different File:Google 2015 logo colorless mourning period.svg and others under PD-textlogo? All of them are just texts formatted in that or the other way. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 18:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
