Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 8th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CSD#G10

(Talk/留言) 08:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination COM:CSD#G10. -- FitIndia Talk Mail 09:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). -- FitIndia Talk Mail 11:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mckaylagrace as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo|regtrademark=yes whym (talk) 13:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license fixed, in use; uncontroversial keep. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file Ajay Wallack (talk) 15:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Watermark, this is from depositphotos. Unlikely to be licensed under Creative Commons. Badzil (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:34, 10 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree stock image --Krdbot 19:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ji-Elle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EugeneZelenko, I cannot even understand what bothers you. All necessary information is provided for these 17th century documents. I met the people at the library (Médiathèque protestante de Strasbourg) 2 days ago. They said I should take the pictures from Flickr. Then I used the uploading tool from Flickr that is supposed to do everything automatically. Apparently not. What went wrong here [1] ? - Ji-Elle (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Did Creative Commons licenses exist in 17th century? Definitely not, so proper public domain tags should be used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The wrong tags came from the Flickr import tool, not from me. What can I do ? Remove the Flickr template ? Ji-Elle (talk) 19:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The proper tag is "PD-old-100-1923". I have corrected the files, now you can  Keep them.--Edelseider (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License tags were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Senapa (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Senapa (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Senapa (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 19:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://bandershtat.org.ua/galereya/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and self promotion! Ras67 (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage, no use. 😎 #TakuNation (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghayoor Bhatti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE ([2])

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edwin.javier.nuñez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are from Internet sales portals and unfree screenshots.

Ras67 (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Petter Falck, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Madeleine Quist Odgren, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and copyright violation! Ras67 (talk) 21:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gunnarbla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False dates, low-re images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johanlauret974 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Work of an artist which is alive so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 21:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harisingh&sons (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are from Internet sales portals and copyrighted!

Ras67 (talk) 21:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Harisingh&sons (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are from Internet sales portals and copyrighted!

Ras67 (talk) 22:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 22:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope of the project Wvdp (talk) 08:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 03:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsence chemical reaction; no products are shown, what does "[R]" depict? Poor-quality file with opaque background. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 05:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The image is a part of a question from a textbook, and the surrounding text defines "R" as "reduction" (read as "what is the product of reduction of the given structure?"). Totally non-standard, and I don't see a COM:EDUSE here. User:CFCF appears to have uploaded the whole set of images from the whole textbook (Category:CNX Chemistry Textbook), but apparently not the book itself and definitely no attempt at curation of that collection. There are a lot of low-quality images, and images that have no real use apart from the specific point in the book.  Delete indeed. DMacks (talk) 06:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused personal photo, possible harassment — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blank file (Talk/留言) 08:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful file: not description, not name, not metadata. Screenshot of a computer with some kind of messure, not determinated. Ganímedes (talk) 09:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorised media. Unhelpful description. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 09:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media repository. Seems like a test file and by the blocked user. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media repository. Not used since 2011? Maybe related to File:Testing sound 1.ogg Estopedist1 (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only for now-deleted spam page at enwiki. Kinu (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abiriwman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused posters of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Begajol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage, no USE!!!! 😎 Nettersteal (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (:en:Kenneth Jones (musician)) Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable low quality image, superseded by other better images in its category. P 1 9 9   17:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorised media. Nonsense description. Commons is not a private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this pic is a book cover and it is not own work (copyright violation) [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haizerrota (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While free on flickr these are photos of photos or artwork taken by others and still under copyright. Needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wish to deindex my Wikimedia Commons account from Google. VintageSeltzer (talk) 08:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may put __NOINDEX__ on your talk page. – Kwj2772 (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept User talk pages should not be deleted, use __NOINDEX__ instead. Masum Reza📞 11:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This File is Not Needed For Uploads नमन भगत (talk) 14:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Personal photograph. Out of scope. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete This Pic नमन भगत (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Personal photograph. Out of scope. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Photo Is Not Needed For Upload नमन भगत (talk) 14:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Personal photograph. Out of scope. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please explain why it's public domain yet in Nicaragua. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One web source gives a 1942 date for this book. That is far too late to assume that the author has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on copyrighted material taken from the website of the city of Warsaw (historical aerial photos from 1987 [3]). According to the website policy the content of the website is not free [4]. Botev (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 00:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evagirl1991 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected flickrwashing. New flickr account, with 6 photos, no followers. Highly suspicious

Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HBW Alive images are all copyrighted, image is from here: https://www.hbw.com/species/somali-pigeon-columba-oliviae Soldier of Wasteland (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook code in metadata. Description is not descriptive ("argenitinian actor"). Who's the actor? Which one of the "Teatro Colón" is this (there are a few), etc. Ganímedes (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover, permission needed (Talk/留言) 09:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problematic, unlikely to be own work. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Uganda national Anthem.mid Estopedist1 (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Estopedist1 (talk) 10:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.non-stop-people.com/actu/musique/xvbarbar-kaaris-est-un-modele-de-reussite-exclu-91679 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not a selfie. Who is the photographer, please? Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not a selfie. Who is the photographer, please? Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user who uploaded it does not own it. It is a copyright violation. The photo is copyrighted to Laterit productions 2A01:E34:EC0B:A710:6418:BC9:AF3A:87AE 11:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: Only used in a userpage that is likely to be self-promotion.

Ahmadtalk 11:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like this guy started something but it isn't there anymore. And I have no intention of finishing it, so...😎 Nettersteal (talk) 16:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly above the threshold. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8585703708/in/photolist-e5FYAh 92.135.108.238 17:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: too old, the author died in 1874. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by TwoWings as no permission (No permission since), Image is a bizarre recreation of File:Elvana Gjata concert at Zone Club (Prishtina) 2015 1.jpg. Эlcobbola talk 18:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license. PD-USGov applies to federal works; this is a work of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Indeed, the source site says "© 1995 - 2019 Commonwealth of Virginia", a notice federal sites notably omit. Эlcobbola talk 19:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer relevant on my website Morning Light Glass (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirection inutile Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Threshold of originality is quite low in UK. Taivo (talk) 22:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this file so I can reupload the same image with a new caption Arbil44 (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please could this deletion request be cancelled as the caption issue has now been resolved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arbil44 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not a selfie, if this is uploader, it's not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: it was uploaded by User:Arbil44 (the author, Anne Ammundsen) and she clearly owns the photograph which is of herself. Dormskirk (talk) 08:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Owning a photo is not the same thing as owning the copyright of a photo. It's obviously not a selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per OGL This was taken by the Official RN photographer at the Fleet Headquarters, Northwood. I have written to the Photographic Department at Northwood and they are working on finding a way to give me permission.
Later. Northwood-man could not possibly have been more helpful and was very much in favour of me using this image, but it has reached the point where I have to contact the MOD to take this further. The options open to me, without going to the MOD, would appear to be these:
1) The Crown Copyright expires at the end of April 2022, at which time there are no copyright restrictions on this image. This will mean I can use it then, but in the meantime...
2) Would Wikipedia host it, where it is, along the lines of the NPG image of Cyril Lloyd - i.e. under a different licence (not free to use), until less than two years from now? Who looks at my userpage - nobody really - so not being on a main page might mean this would be acceptable? I truly hope so.
3) The Mary Ann Mansel letters are hosted externally on the Robert Manners page, via a pdf. link. Northwood-man suggested I do something along these lines by creating a pdf. document - and that's the thing - it would no longer be a photograph, but rather a document. Although Northwood-man thinks this would be fine, copyright-wise, I would still have to double-check with MOD. I am not keen on this idea at all. It defeats the purpose of what I have created on my userpage - my life-achievements (although mainly Asgill related). Others have masses of wikvi-qualifications - degrees - impressive jobs - and other things to be proud of. For me, my service to Queen and country means a lot to me. And, by the way, the Northwood-man says that lots and lots of images, taken by him, are all over Wikipedia with no accreditation to him. He has no idea how this has been possible. Why, then, is this one little image of me on my userpage being targetted? Thoughts, anyone? Arbil44 (talk) 00:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted from my userpage, which does not mean I agree that this image did not belong to me. This was very painful to do since I am extremely proud that I served my Queen and country, as my mother and father both did too. Arbil44 (talk) 23:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Please provide a source of proof that it is covered by an OGL. Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this file so I can reupload it with a new caption Arbil44 (talk) 00:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please could this deletion request be cancelled as the caption issue has now been resolved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arbil44 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's not necessary to delete a file to change the caption, and it seems you have also resolved this issue (as in the other file where you withdrew the request). --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:30, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist is still alive, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not able to get permission at this time. Also same for https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iziko_sang_As_the_old_ones_sing_02.jpg --Nkansahrexford (talk) 08:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Johannes Phokela is still alive and therefore are the works copyrighted, making these photos COM:DW. I delelted both images linked above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality. The depicted person could be anybody. Bradford (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, image is in use and therefore in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not this original logo anymore. Will be replaced in a new version. Has to be replaced for this oneː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Escudo_de_Jard%C3%ADn_Am%C3%A9rica.jpg Regions (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Replace the image on the individual Wikipedia project/articles. This file should bekept on Wikimedia Commons for historical purposes. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 14:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. this statue was established in 2005. eien20 (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (COM:FOP Japan). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder is en:The Illustrated London News and not the Museum of Hartlepool Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain, why you are sure, that this statement is true? You 've made a lot of trouble on the french WP (see here) and therefore, asking you is strongly recommended. Antonsusi (talk) 20:11, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The fact that the newspaper ceased publication does not mean the copyrights go away; they can be sold off for example. I hesitate to delete something marked PD by an institution like that, but looking through images in the same photo stream, they have album covers by Britney Spears, Elton John, the Spice Girls, and others, along with other magazine covers, and a photo of a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle doll. I can only imagine the license extends to the photograph itself, and not the pictured items of which they are derivative (or straight copies). Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, this statement about Illustrated London News is helpful: In March 2010, Cengage Learning launched a full digitised Illustrated London News, allowing researchers unprecedented online access to this invaluable historical resource. --LexICon (talk) 19:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Right. The ILN archive has been housed at Mary Evans since a management buyout of the ILN Publishing Group from its former parent company, Sea Containers, in December 2007. So they bought the copyrights. In March 2010, Cengage Learning launched a full digitised Illustrated London News, allowing researchers unprecedented online access to this invaluable historical resource. Available through universities and subscribing libraries and institutions. [...] Image licensing continues to be handled by Mary Evans Picture Library and researchers requesting high resolution images via Cengage for reproduction will be referred back to us. In other words, they are making it available for researchers through universities etc. but will charge for anything commercial. They are not remotely a "free" license (which has nothing to do with cost, but the rights that other users have), so they can't be hosted here. The Hartlepool Museum does not own any copyright and cannot license it. At most, they are licensing the photographic copies they made, which probably do not rise to copyright at all in some/most countries. There are a bunch of adjacent items in their photo stream which are also mostly certainly under copyright by others. I doubt seriously the museum owns the rights to a Spice Girls album cover, for example. When it comes to the photo of the doll, they can release their rights to the photo, but it's still a derivative work of the doll and commercial use would still be a problem, so we'd need a license from that copyright owner too. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper license; identified as "own work" when clearly that is not the case as stated in the description. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

simply correst the license, it's clearly PD-art. --Shakko (talk) 19:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license corrected. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily below threshold of originality, and the file's name suggests that it has been downloaded from a website. Ahmadtalk 11:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Hong Kong, no FoP for 2D works in general. Wcam (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete:Violation of Template:FoP-Hong Kong: contains posters in public places.--林勇智 09:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screen grab from BBC Parliament with graphics inlay. Unsure if it may qualify for speedy delete. JRHorse (talk) 04:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page is no longer relevant on website Morning Light Glass (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrsinghparmar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, at moment they are all in scope. Most of them are used in various pages in various projects. Nevertheless I delete 2 of them as copyright violations from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random street shot, same as File:Catedral, Asuncion, Paraguay - panoramio (157).jpg Pibwl (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject has requested that this be deleted as its not a complimentary pose. Victuallers (talk) 13:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Commons has a portrait of the same day, not needed at all. --Strakhov (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If only it didn't have that line that looked a crack. I won't lie, I downloaded the picture. 😎 Nettersteal (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:18, 25 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Derivative work of [5] --Krdbot 01:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reqest by uploader. Not used and will not be used. Ivan-r (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ČeškoPeťko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.documentamadrid.com/en/films/comandante-arian. PLease note too user LadislavRak is claiming copyright on some of the same images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong CC Goesseln (talk) 10:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the licence Mutter Erde (talk) 07:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has no usage on any page and no description indicating value. I think that's enough 😎 Nettersteal (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + probably taken from the Net (thumbnail). Ruthven (msg) 14:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Office work. It actually doesn't look boring. No usage, no chance. Bag em and tag em😎 Nettersteal (talk) 16:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission from Magali Girardin. (Talk/留言) 16:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Outilshg: Are you Magali Girardin? If yes, would you mind to upload original photograph which has high file size and good quality? Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Lev Bukovsky (1910-1984).

Eleassar (t/p) 17:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Latvia. The monument was finished in 1985. It had multiple sculptors/architects, and at least two of them are still living according to the Latvian Wikipedia.

kyykaarme (talk) 23:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I understand your desire to protect the rights of Latvian authors. Protect these sculptors from infringement of copyrights. The Latvian Copyright Law (2000) also contributes to this. http://www.gencs.eu/uploads/european_patent_trademark_registration/latvia/Copyright%20Law%20Latvia.pdf
This "Law" (2000) permits the publication of photographs of monuments located on squares and city streets.
This “Law” (2000), where a special place is devoted to monumental art and architectural objects, was created to popularize authors, protect their name and disseminate knowledge about the culture and art of Latvia.
Kalnroze (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I well understand that reading (too verbose) legislative acts of other states is time-consuming, therefore I am sending two quotes from the Latvian Law on Copyright, http://www.gencs.eu/uploads/european_patent_trademark_registration/latvia/Copyright%20Law%20Latvia.pdf.

Section 19. Use of a Work of an Author without the Consent of the Author and without Remuneration
(1) Copyright shall not be considered infringed if a work of an author is used without the consent of the author and without remuneration pursuant to the procedures specified by this Law:
1) a work is used for informational purposes taking into account the provisions of Section 20 of this Law;
2) a work is used for educational and research purposes taking into account the provisions of Section 21 of this Law; (...etc.)
Section 25. Use of a Work on Public Display
(1) It is permitted to use images of works of architecture, photography, visual arts, design, as well as of applied arts, permanently displayed in public places, for personal use and as information in news broadcasts or reports of current events, or include in works for non-commercial purposes. (... etc. in subsequent Articles ...)
This Law protects the rights of authors and promotes the free flow of information. Therefore, the so-called Freedom of Panorama is not relevant for Latvia.
Kalnroze (talk) 13:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Kalnroze: Thank you for citing the law sections, however, I don't believe they are sufficient to host images on Commons because, per COM:L: "Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose." Does the law allow the using of the images for commercial purposes? -kyykaarme (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyykaarme:

I am the author of four photos. These photos depict the events taking place in Riga on Victory Square. The composition of these photographs includes small FRAGMENTS of a large architectural and sculptural ensemble.

I believe that the images of these fragments do not violate (do not limit, do not infringe) the copyrights of the authors of this large memorial complex ( The Latvian Copyright Law - 2000).
I am the author of these photos. I am the author of the compositional solution to these files. I authorize the use of these photographs for commercial purposes.
Kalnroze (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC) [reply]
@Kalnroze: It would be helpful if you could provide links to the specific images which you think should not be deleted as per COM:De minimis. I didn't nominate all images in the category as I tried to leave out the images in which the monument is trivial or in the background, but there might be some images that I did nominate that can be kept, and in the end it's up to the admin to determine that. The fact that you give a permission to use the photograph makes no difference to the copyright of the work itself. Also note that the Latvian Wikipedia hosts an image of this monument with what looks like a "fair use" tag based on the Section 25 you cited, and a warning not to move the file to Commons without a review. -kyykaarme (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no audio file. Wrong format? Estopedist1 (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no sound. Correct is probably File:The Tell-Tale Heart-maxallen1.ogg Estopedist1 (talk) 09:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no audio file? Same file:Macron10 chang.ogg Estopedist1 (talk) 10:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no audio file? Same file:Macron 10 chang.ogg Estopedist1 (talk) 10:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks cool but has no value. Free licence but no usage or description. Peace 😎 Nettersteal (talk) 16:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am clearly identifiable as a person and do not agree with the publication of the image on the Internet. 129.132.109.162 09:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:BLP. Unused. Courtesy deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too bad quality Estopedist1 (talk) 09:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Keep CC verified before that.--Roy17 (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Achim (talk) 19:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong CC Goesseln (talk) 10:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Correct CC. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedian -out of scope --Alaa :)..! 12:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete, because Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg has changed its terms of use on March 13, 2019 , see https://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/helios/digi/nutzung/Welcome.html (means: Allowed is only non commercial use) Mutter Erde (talk) 11:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC verified before that.--Roy17 (talk) 17:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Roy17. --Achim (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong CC, the artist Kesting died 1970 Goesseln (talk) 09:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What has changed since the previous DR ? Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Delete @Clindberg: The Universitätsbibliothek might be the creator of the COM:DW (but per PD-art we don't care about the creator of such 2D-DWs). The real artist of the artwork is not the Universitätsbibliothek (translated: Univerity Library), but Edmund Kesting. There is no evidence that the Library has "taken over" the copyright from the artist, or his heirs. The previous DR only discussed the library's change of license on their website, not if they actually were to copyright owners, to begin with. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We need permission from Artists estate. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image (though at lower resolution) at https://www.missmalini.com/2018/11/27/this-12-year-old-american-indian-scientist-is-the-inventor-of-a-life-saving-device/, earlier than uploaded here. I think uploader needs to email COM:OTRS and explain how they are the owner of the copyright of this image. GRuban (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © 2019. FUNGLODE República Dominicana y Comité Científico Técnico General de la enciclopedia. Todos los derechos reservados. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: Err though the uploader of this file is highly questionable, I don't think encaribe.org is the copyright holder of this photo. The copyright notice appears to apply to the text of the articles, their photos originate from various sources and many are historical. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: It may be. Nevertheless there's a problem with the country: one says it's a Dominican work, the other it's a Cuban one. If it's Cuben uploader must provide an evidence of publication. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image founded in Creative Coommons. Where is your problem? Are you kidding? OsvátA Palackposta 14:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This document is the report of a study in a theoretical physics subject (helicon waves in metals) done and written in 1969 by Hans Dekker, at that time being a student at the University of Technology in Delft, The Netherlands, and at present professor emeritus at the University of Amsterdam. The document is a pdf copy of the original report, and has been supplied by the author himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadekk (talk • contribs) 12:08, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hadekk: We need an OTRS permission from the University email of the prof. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 15:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:12, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On NSSDC, no indication this file is in the PD and at the bottom of the page says it is for illustrative purposes and may not be in the PD Kees08 (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most likely not a NASA work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random street shot, with no educational use - the same for File:Catedral, Asuncion, Paraguay - panoramio (32).jpg, File:Catedral, Asuncion, Paraguay - panoramio (33).jpg, File:Catedral, Asuncion, Paraguay - panoramio (34).jpg. One might be left at best. Pibwl (talk) 10:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random street serial shots, the same for File:San Roque, Asuncion, Paraguay - panoramio (11).jpg, File:San Roque, Asuncion, Paraguay - panoramio (12).jpg Pibwl (talk) 10:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is well established here that a work that is located in a Federal building or was commissioned by the Federal government may or may not be PD. In order to qualify as PD US Gov, it must be shown that the artist was a Federal employee at the time of creation. See, for example, the note at Category:Official presidential painted portraits in the White House.

The creator of this work, Jay Matternes is not now and apparently never was an employee of the Federal government. While it is possible that these works is PD No Notice or PD No Renewal, I note that Matternes has 121 entries in the USCO post-1977 database of registrations and renewals, which strongly suggests that he pays attention to copyright.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Before starting an unnecessary wave of destruction, we should ask Jay Matternes for an OTRS permission. I am going to write an email to him. Sciencia58 (talk) 18:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In the case of File:Stegomastodon mirificus - Smithsonian.JPG, the artwork is partially visible in the background, is not well displayed, and is incidental to the unrelated subject of the photo, which is of a fossil gomphothere skeleton. In every other example listed, the artwork is the subject of the photo. While I suppose the artwork could be blanked out if needed, in this case that hardly seems necessary. WolfmanSF (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.livescience.com/40352-cenozoic-era.html Sciencia58 (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The artist is living and has website http://www.jay-matternes.com/ which has email link. Has anyone contacted the artist? Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree: Wait for input from the artist. I suspect that many, of not all, of the works will be adjudged public domain. Valerius Tygart (talk) 00:11, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some others of these images were deleted before, so I will step back and let others decide. On the other hand, if the files above are kept, the previously deleted files should be restored. FunkMonk (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote an email to Jay Matternes a few days ago. He has alreadey answered very friendly. The context "Wikimedia" was new to him. He asked for the reason of my request. I just wrote an explanation and sent the licence template to him, in case he agrees. Sciencia58 (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I just received an email from Jay Matterns. Sad news: He refuses to give us a licence. Sciencia58 (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But do we know if he was commissioned by the federal government at the time? FunkMonk (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
His answer to my first email:
"Dear ..., in reference to your email of November 8, 2019, I have not had time to the present to check the website you referenced, but I assume that the subject of your inquiry is the rights to the six murals of fossil mammals which I painted on commission for the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C., discontinuously from 1960 to 1975. To be brief: I have never been a salaried employee of the federal government i.e., I have never held a civil service position; and I have been a full-time, free-lance artist / illustrator since 1960. I registered each of these murals for copyright in my name with the U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress, as soon as I completed each commission. Accordingly, while the Smithsonian owns the actual murals, I own all reproduction rights to these works, since copyright is a separate right from the actual physical paintings.
I hope that answers your question.
Sincerely,
Jay H. Matternes"
Ok, that's pretty clear. FunkMonk (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the painting from the background of File:Stegomastodon mirificus - Smithsonian.JPG and thus have removed it from the list above. If someone wants to, they can delete the old version from Commons. WolfmanSF (talk) 08:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it fell under Commons:de minimis to begin with, but now there's no issue. FunkMonk (talk) 13:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edfram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments Eugene.

The document (file RWWA) is from The Foundation of Rhine-Westphalia Economy Archive of Cologne - this is a public archive/Chamber of Commerce record. From rwwa.de website it states: "RWWA is basically accessible to any visitor with a scientific interest. The use of our archive is free." Their regulations do not seem to prohibit its use here. The original author of the document was the company "Eau de Cologne & Parfümerie Fabrik Glockengasse No. 4711 gegenüber der Pferdepost von Ferd. Mülhens in Köln am Rhein", which was based in Germany at the time but has long since ceased trading. It was created in March 1954 (over 65 years ago). The tag has been corrected to reflect this (changed to Public Domain). If this needs to be amended for any reason, please let me know so that I can update accordingly.

The historical photograph (file Selima and Edward Fram) belongs to me, Dr. F. E. Fram. It is from my family archive and I have the complete rights to the image and its use.

I hope this information helps a little.

If there is anything else I can do to improve things, clarify etc. please just let me know.

Best wishes, Ed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edfram (talk • contribs) 17:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the first file as this letter seems to lack any creativity and would be below the COM:TOO. The second file was already deleted by User:Well-Informed Optimist citing this DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless it's being used by a wiki or is in some category that makes sense....Where should it be, WWII? 😎 Nettersteal (talk) 16:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Earlier version of File:Adriaen Paets (1697-1765), gekozen in 1734 Rijksmuseum SK-A-4522.jpeg, Non-PD background, lacking full color profile. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]