Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 25th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per availability at https://m.sohu.com/a/347227108_100148400/?pvid=000115_3w_a Eatcha (talk) 03:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The resolution of the image I uploaded is much higher than the version published on Sohu.com and comes with complete metadata information. This is enough to prove that I am the copyright holder of the image.--え06 (talk) 04:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination and  Keep I can't find a bigger resolution image on the internet. Sorry -- Eatcha (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter, thank you.--え06 (talk) 04:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Muhammad Faryad Rao 202.69.11.191 08:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD |1= F1|2=source: https://twitter.com/makopikonyan48/status/1179016462649839617}} 毒島みるく (talk) 05:05, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination speedied as clearly without permission. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The trophy is copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Will reopen in mass. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion request Maccabee359 (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Túrelio with reason "Copyright violation: https://news.yahoo.co.jp/byline/tanakahisakatsu/20190917-00142558/". Taivo (talk) 20:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism Edslov (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, seems like vandalism. Taivo (talk) 21:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 01:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, incorrectly sourced, superseded by higher quality File:Hikvision logo.svg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing graphic Paperburner (talk) 02:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely user's own work, possibly grabbed from Facebook according to EXIF data "FBMD" NinjaStrikers «» 04:21, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bahnmoeller as no license (No license since) Eatcha (talk) 05:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bahnmoeller please add a machine readable license, it was marked for speedy by V2C -- Eatcha (talk) 05:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
--Bahnmoeller (talk) 08:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Now it has a licence -- `Eatcha (talk) 09:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bahnmoeller please add a license. Eatcha (talk) 05:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the image has now license. Taivo (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong image Maccabee359 (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file might not be in the public domain outside the United States and should not be transferred. Georges Chevalier died in 1967, there is no proof that the image is freely available in Franceedia Commons unless it can be verified to be in the public domain in its country of first publication and that at least 70 years have elapsed since the author died. Commons requires that images be free in the source country and in the United States.

The author of the photo Georges Chevalier died in 1967, there is no proof that the image is freely available in France. GAndy (talk) 23:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albert kahn.jpg. --Sealle (talk) 03:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 00:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, no permission A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition bad quality: tilted, object is badly focused. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is in project scope, because it is used and every real user has right for couple of personal photos in userpage. But this is very small photo (213×205), source is "personal computer" and author is WiLL. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos taken by Press Eye employees, not works from Northern Ireland Office A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Email sent to Press Eye at mail@presseye.com inquiring about whether they released the copyright to NIO. If so, I'll guide them through the OTRS process. Thanks. // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Got a reply from PressEye: "Thank you for your email. The copyright remains with Press Eye Ltd and therefore may not be used in Wikipedia."
The file should be deleted. Thank you for noticing the metadata and marking these, A1Cafel // sikander { talk } 🦖 20:11, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, permission to use the file will not come. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repetido Tlakoache 05:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlakoache (talk • contribs) 05:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo Velez Escultor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Recently uploaded PNG that is redundant to File:CC-BY icon.svg.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:19, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by GreenMeansGo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image apparently taken from facebook. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 01:37, 26 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 07:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not png resolution Ilyas7777 (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete this image because the resoluation is not clean Ilyas7777 (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be an exact copy of a copyrighted image in this article on a commercial website. Image was uploaded one day after the article was published, and has the same full size resolution and properties as the copyrighted image. Danazar (talk) 19:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Yup It looks like not an own work. I tagged it for speedy deletion. Masum Reza📞 00:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Hedwig in Washington. Masum Reza📞 19:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://twitter.com/Oleh_Smal/status/989561968481783809/photo/1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я передумал. Больше не хочу чтобы было доступным публично WikiSpirit1234 (talk) 18:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No file, has already been deleted 2019-10-25. --Achim (talk) 13:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Benennung, wurde nicht verwendet. Fruchtzwerg94 (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, creator's request in uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, seeminly personal or unnotable image Kissa21782 (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Uploader is blocked for 2 weeks due to uploading out-of-scope files after warnings. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anoda15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission. Some are book covers which require explicit permission for them to be on commons. For the quotes(?), source/permission for the background image is needed if they aren't the uploader's own work. Majority of the remaining are selfies which might be from Facebook. Last 2 files (File:الحسين داود.jpg & File:رحلات وعمل.jpg) that have metadata might not be the uploader's own work as one of them translates to Hussein Dawood.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) + Derivative work of non-free content (F3)/COM:NETCOPYVIO --Эlcobbola talk 08:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anoda15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 08:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anoda15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 08:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Spam Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@علاء: Could you please have a look? I'm not sure this is spam. Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:CSD#G10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shefqetemini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shefqetemini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gunkov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source/permission to determine the copyright status of the drawings. +Files are derived from FB.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:47, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gunkov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation : http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51ADKBPG22L._SL500_.jpg Esprit Fugace (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not PD as claimed. --Sealle (talk) 04:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely grabbed from http://www.gov.sr/sr/ministerie-van-defensie/het-nationaal-leger/de-militaire-politie-%28mp%29.aspx, as File:Landmacht 500x258.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying around 25 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different flickr-accounts, blogs, airliners.net etc., example: File:Gumair-Cessna U206G Stationair6 PZ-TBD airborne.jpg = grabbed from http://www.flickr.com/photos/59783485@N04/6386125911), totalizing now +/- 50 uploads deleted as copyvio, it´s difficult to believe that these following files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Additional info: File:SAF-001 Suriname.jpg previously circulating via http://latinairforces.blogspot.de/2007/12/surinam-air-force.html (2007). File:CaricomSLM CommuterIslander.jpg previously circulating (even with blurry res and cropped) via http://www.dbsuriname.com/dbsuriname/index.php/slm-vliegt-weer-naar-binnenland/ (= .jpg, last modified: 16.03.2013). Obs.: Nominated are only those files without exif. There are still 8 files taken with a "Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL" for which I presume (assuming an extra large portion of good faith) "real own work".

Gunnex (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook downloads (“FBMD” in EXIF), require OTRS tickets

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong CC Häberer died 1978 Goesseln (talk) 18:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong CC Häberer died 1978 Goesseln (talk) 18:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/photo/P-002498~2F01-8 Cheep (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Obviously not a copyvio per [1]. The contents of the website are licensed under CC-4 International, unless otherwise noted. Masum Reza📞 23:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Masum Reza. - Groupir ! (talk) 18:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/photo/P-002498~2F01-8 Cheep (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Obviously not a copyvio per [2]. The contents of the website are licensed under CC-4 International, unless otherwise noted. Masum Reza📞 23:39, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos taken by Press Eye employees, not works from Northern Ireland Office

A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Email sent to Press Eye at mail@presseye.com inquiring about whether they released the copyright to NIO. If so, I'll guide them through the OTRS process. Thanks. // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Got a reply from PressEye: "Thank you for your email. The copyright remains with Press Eye Ltd and therefore may not be used in Wikipedia."
The files should be deleted. Thank you for noticing the metadata and marking these, A1Cafel // sikander { talk } 🦖 20:11, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no permission as email quoted by sikander. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image and lack of EXIF data, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image and lack of EXIF data, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either a copyvio or self-promotion. 193.171.152.104 05:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ttpx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

From [3], no permission.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is clearly a cropped magazine cover Trivialist (talk) 10:09, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://theoptimist.news/aizya-naaz-joshi-bridging-the-gap-between-genders/ 86.141.98.59 10:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per COM:PCP unless the claim of copyright ownership made in the file’s description can be verified per COM:OTRS. Generally, it’s the photographer who takes the photo, not the subject of the photo, who is considered to be the copyright holder; however, it’s possible that this could be a en:work-for-hire that involved a transfer of copyright ownership to the subject. In either case, a COM:CONSENT email should be sent to OTRS by the copyright holder for the file to be kept. — Marchjuly (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif said that Eric Flogny is the author, but not the information box. Need permission. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mark Duffer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a host for private photos.

Roy17 (talk) 11:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "FBMD" in the exif-data, this indicates that the file was downloaded from Facebook.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken by me, sometimes I use Facebook as my photo storage place, and I will upload them to wikicommons. --Foxy1219 (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Foxy1219: OTRS strongly recomended.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful photos

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; some need permission. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhd14969 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor quality photos with no encyclopedic value uploaded by vanity spammer.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:12, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alivahedian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality, unencyclopedic photos uploaded by xwiki vanity spammer.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sinnon73 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: One deleted, other processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pixabay images. Images uploaded from Pixabay dated before 2019 (files uploaded since the site's recent license change in early January 2019 are no longer under CC0). Please add the date of creation and the {{Pixabay}} tag.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Over a month and no progress. Individual files can be undeleted if evidence of proper source and date is provided to COM:REFUND. --Storkk (talk) 10:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.undergroundpress.co.za/news/fokofpolisiekar-new-music-new-fokof-lager-box-new-exhibition

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A collection of small images - uncategorized - which do not appear to be fully own work of uploader. Drawings, painting, illustrations, photographs of other photos and so on. No useful metadata indicating creation.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep File:Frans Hals 008.jpg. I examined this one because it was so obviously PD and I wondered what could have gone sour. I think the nominator misunderstood the history. There was a file called File:Skildery.png which apparently had the same image and may indeed have been missing the metadata. But it has been redirected to File:Frans Hals 008.jpg, which in the summary does explain that it was painted in the seventeenth century, so it's definitely PD, and also has the license tags claiming that it's PD. --Trovatore (talk) 01:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Frans Hals 008.jpg. per above, plus it is sourced to the PD collection the Yorck Project, like tens of thousands of other Commons pics. It has been around since 2005, is fully categorized, and has tons of metadata. It is used in many articles on many wikis. Johnbod (talk) 03:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. Copyright holders should confirm the licenses via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gorg dahaak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work ("Foto: Tomáš Halász"), derivatives already present on other sites https://stranaspolu.sk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/juraj-hips.png Teslaton (talk) 15:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; author Tomas Halasz per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by GreenMeansGo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image apparently taken from facebook,. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. Out of the project scope. Edslov (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

During the transfer data was lost and it has been shortened at each side. I will upload another version later. The joy of all things (talk) 19:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-Free File Mehman 97 19:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: IrynaKabanova, per File:Козацький гарт.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: IrynaKabanova, per File:Голова оргкомітету фесту.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Horaciodonpig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://drroch.mx/terminos-de-uso/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is uploaded as "own work" and released with CC licence, yet the description says it is copyrighted. Dorsetonian (talk) 22:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a non-free film poster. An obvious copyrignt violation and obviously this is not an Own work. Can be uploaded locally under the claim of fair use with a clear fair use rationale. I am marking this for speedy deletion . Masum Reza📞 23:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Hedwig. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Plasmalogen-Biosynthesis en.svg and File:Plasmalogen-Biosynthesis.svg. Leyo 22:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: unfortunately Austrian stamps are copyright to the designer and require individual permission from them for each stamp per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Austria#Stamps. The uploader does not have permission to release this image freely. Ww2censor (talk) 23:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a trademark (football crest)... how can it be a free-licence logo? No indication about a Creative Commons release... — danyele 23:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, no realistic educational use -> out of COM:SCOPE. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 23:55, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

0,3 sec. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 08:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Small image impossible to work out what it is. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 08:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised video. No explanation Estopedist1 (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person, rejected WP article, lack of notoriety. No educational value in this image Richard Avery (talk) 22:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use Keith Edkins (talk) 18:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht farbecht JoName95 (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht farbecht JoName95 (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht farbecht JoName95 (talk) 18:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sinnlose Weiterleitung/ not usefull redirect Calle Cool (talk) 18:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can be deleted, artifact from movement. SteveK (talk) 19:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht farbecht JoName95 (talk) 18:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht farbecht JoName95 (talk) 18:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht farbecht JoName95 (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht farbecht JoName95 (talk) 18:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page was created in error in my own user space. Martinvl (talk) 19:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Accidental creation. --Wdwd (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Indonesia#Freedom_of_panorama. --Wdwd (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto beschreibt nicht den Verband, sondern den RDA-Workshop und ist daher unpassend. Zudem heißt der RDA-Workshop mittlerweile RDA Group Travel Expo, somit ist das Foto außerdem veraltet. Marketing RDA (talk) 06:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das sind keine Gründe zum Löschen des Fotos, allenfalls Hinweise, wie es verwendet oder nicht verwendet werden soll. Behalten/Keep. --Kürschner (talk) 07:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. University logo can't be own or free. Bilderling (talk) 06:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is used by the Jägerbataillon 24 (Infantry battalion 24) for their troup newspaper. Thereby it's unlike licenced under a free licence and it's even more unlikely that it is an own work D-Kuru (talk) 08:09, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Wikimanbd (talk) 09:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikimanbd: It's not a copy.It's taken from my mobile. ইফতেখার নাইম (talk) 09:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (derivative work without permission). --Wdwd (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional. Insignificant or nonexistent organization. Senator2029 11:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 18:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter es:Absalón Argañarás died in 1980 and the painting is copyrighted until 2051 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 11:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Gunofficial1998 (talk) 13:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kacper Gadomski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from background. Should be blanked to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License claim ("created by NASA") is in direct contradiction to the statement on the source page (NASA's own page) that the author is an "unidentified airline passenger". And there's nothing anywhere to indicate that the image is licensed in any way, PD, or anything else we can hang our hats on. I can't imagine a fair-use rationale. EEng (talk) 03:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per nomination. Taivo (talk) 18:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unspecified source, unclear why this licence applies. "Source: dingbat fonts Author unknown: simple wide-spread figure" is not sufficient and it seems unlikely to be so simple to not qualify for copyright protection. Deletion request triggered by searching for train silhouettes with a clear copyright status. I tried to find original source but failed. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Train Silhouette L.svg Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unspecified source, unclear why this licence applies. "Source: dingbat fonts Author unknown: simple wide-spread figure" is not sufficient and it seems unlikely to be so simple to not qualify for copyright protection. Deletion request triggered by searching for train silhouettes with a clear copyright status. I tried to find original source but failed. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Train Silhouette R.svg 08:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, it is not simple image as claimed. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ce fichier n'est plus utilisé par la page concernant l'église st Lambert, Paris 15ième Charluber (talk) 09:56, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pamputt as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from the source field, the uploader is not the person who took the picture.|source=http://amdc.in2p3.fr/bulletins/aahw/Nikhef.html
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the presented evidence isn't very convincing in this case. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photo for the website of www.nikhef.nl in 2003. The page on the french site is a copy of Nikhef's page which has now gone! So, no deletion please. See the original source entry on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keeshu (talk • contribs) 10:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Keeshu: if you did not take the picture yourself, you have to prove that the picture is in the public domain. It is probably not. Pamputt (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope/copyvio. Photograph from family album. One subject is Astère Dhondt (1937-2000, not encyclopaedically relevant) and the picture is taken at the end of the 1950s. Uploader is probably the son of both subjects and can therefore not have taken the photograph himself as he wasn't born yet. Subject intended of farmhouse (onroerend erfgoed) is actually not visible. Henxter (talk) 10:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CalalC99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© Milli Majlis Republic of Azerbaijan, 2007

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; source says ARR not CC 2.0. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CalalC99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© Milli Majlis Republic of Azerbaijan, 2007 All rights reserved.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I am the author these photos (Milli Majlis). CalalC99 (talк) 15:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CalalC99: You are the National Parliament (Milli Mejlis)??? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am the author these photos. CalalC99 (talк) 17:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CalalC99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Rogel, the copyrights of these photos belong to me. You will not find these photos on the internet. Their poor quality does not mean that photos should be deleted. CalalC99 (talк) 12:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An Administrator will correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think a camera makes .png files so feel free to reupload these images at full resolution directly from your camera. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Rogel, yes, photos are not in png format. These photos were published yesterday. It is in png format. I couldn't find the original version of the photos in 1995. When I saw her, I decided to print a booк from which the photos were collected. Was it understandable in English? I write with translation. CalalC99 (talк) 12:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CalalC99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images of the Milli Majlis (National Parliament) of the Republic of Azerbaijan, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Rogel, I misinterpreted the logo. I saw it now. The logo is taкen from the site. The deputies' photos were not taкen from the website of the Milli Majlis. Visit meclis.gov.az and looк for that photo. Can't find it. This photo is not available on the Internet. I just have one. CalalC99 (talк) 08:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The emblem likely falls under {{PD-AZ-exempt}}. Pbrks (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted all except the logo. При таких обстоятельствах не верю свою работу. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rubbish. Mutter Erde (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. If you nominate a number of files from the same category, please put it in a single DR
  2. rubbish is an insult not a reasoning
  3. the files in question have a sharp foreground displaying the motive in the background on smartphone camera screens and complement the other files of the category.

--C.Suthorn (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not every photo is worth saving, let alone sharing. This one is not. It's an out-of-focus shot of a bunch of people holding their cameras up, not the subject, and a lousy justification doesn't fix that. It fails COM:EDUSE. It's OK to let go of your bad shots, that's part of being a photographer. Better to highlight the good shots than hide them in lousy shots. SilverbackNettalk 22:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per SilverbackNet, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rubbish. Mutter Erde (talk) 12:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. If you nominate a number of files from the same category, please put it in a single DR
  2. rubbish is an insult not a reasoning
  3. the files in question have a sharp foreground displaying the motive in the background on smartphone camera screens and complement the other files of the category.

--C.Suthorn (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not every photo is worth saving, let alone sharing. This one is not. It's an out-of-focus shot of blurred people holding their cameras up, not the subject, and a lousy (and incorrect) justification doesn't fix that. Nothing is sharp about the foreground. It fails COM:EDUSE. It's OK to let go of your bad shots, that's part of being a photographer. SilverbackNettalk 22:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per SilverbackNet, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rubbish. Mutter Erde (talk) 12:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. If you nominate a number of files from the same category, please put it in a single DR
  2. rubbish is an insult not a reasoning
  3. the files in question have a sharp foreground displaying the motive in the background on smartphone camera screens and complement the other files of the category.

--C.Suthorn (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not every photo is worth saving, let alone sharing. This one is not. It's an out-of-focus shot of a bunch of people holding their cameras up, not the subject, and a lousy justification doesn't fix that. It fails COM:EDUSE. It's OK to let go of your bad shots, that's part of being a photographer. SilverbackNettalk 22:11, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per SilverbackNet, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itstephanie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Might not be YouTube uploader's own work. Shots from various angles and distances that is only accomplishable if the uploader is the official photographer/videographer. + I looked at some videos of the YouTube account and some are tagged "re-use" allowed when it isn't own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubted that the image is in PD as the website states all contents are copyrighted. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 15:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work (FoP statement is invalid since the object is located in Russia). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is not important where the object is located. What is important is where the photo of grave was published first. Ruslik (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per nomination. If you have evidence, that the photo was first published outside Russia, then please present it and the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Присутствуют ошибки в описании Надія Герасимова (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Duplicate. Masum Reza📞 00:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Присутствуют ошибки в описании Надія Герасимова (talk) 21:11, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd close this as the nomination statement is not a valid reason for deletion. But this appears to be a Coat of arms and I doubt the uploader is the author.  Delete as this is possibly copyvio. Masum Reza📞 00:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Evidence that image has been published first in Poland (if ever). Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, now all uploaders need to provide proof that an image was published in it's source country. How is that a reason of for deletion?
You tagged the file with a no permission template. The thing is the author of the file probably never released the file in public domain. It's copyrignt status has expired. Besides if the author is dead, how would they send permission to OTRS? For your information, the source website is a government website of Poland. The subject is a Polish actress and it is likely that the photograph was first published in Poland. Is not that enough to prove that it was first published in Poland? Masum Reza📞 21:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Masumrezarock100: It's not a new rule; it has always worked like this. If never published, first, you can't apply the {{PD-Polish}} tag. Second it means that work is still copyrighted. Indeed according to retroactive Polish Copyright Law of 1994 and 2002 amendment work is protected 50 or 70 years after author's death and will be public domain 2053 or 2073. It's up to Hartwig's heirs to provide permission. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I know. But your DR starting statement is No Evidence that image has been published first in Poland (if ever). It would have been helpful if you had provided more clear statement. You statement didn't include any of the information you have just said. We are not supposed to be mind readers. Regards, Masum Reza📞 22:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And lastly you falsely accused me of removing DR templates. You'll need to provide proof that I removed a legitimate DR template. Learn how to use warnings man. Masum Reza📞 22:11, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is the uploader's responsibility to prove copyright status, not patrollers'. That's how Commons works. SilverbackNettalk 22:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it's a patroller responsibility to provide more clear statement why they want a file to be deleted instead of just throwing a no permission tag to the file. Masum Reza📞 22:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is extremely likely to have come from one of the Behind the Scenes collections from 1963-1966 published in Poland by en:Edward Hartwig. That would put it as Polish-published in the required time. But there's a conflict between the template, which says it only applies when there is no clear copyright notice, and the template docs, which say it always applies pre-1994. Something has to give. This appears to have a clear copyright if that is the case. SilverbackNettalk 22:02, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Though we do not have any proof that it was published without a clear copyrignt notice. The uploader likely can provide more information. Which is why I contested it's speedy deletion. This does not appear to be a clear copyrignt violation. Masum Reza📞 22:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a speedy deletion, it's a plain old deletion nomination that's likely to take weeks, like most Commons deletion nominations. But Commons policy is that if unclear, it's better to delete an uncopyrighted image than allow a copyrighted one. SilverbackNettalk 03:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, I know what a speedy deletion is. I contested it's speedy deletion - I was talking about the no permission tag added by Patrick. Masum Reza📞 03:12, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no evidence for publication before 1994. If somebody has such evidence, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file does not appear to be Public Domain because the original copyright holder is Hughes Aircraft. Marshallsumter (talk) 23:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per "The photograph of OSO-8 under construction is courtesy of Hughes Aircraft Company." This indicates that the original copyright holder of the image is Hughes Aircraft Company.

Searching NASA's HEASARC site so far has produced no statement of copyright outside Public Domain for images displayed on the site including the above image.

Per Commons:Deletion requests: "If the closing admin is unable to say with reasonable certainty that the file can validly be kept, it should be deleted in accordance with Commons' precautionary principle." --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found the image here by clicking on OSO-8 under construction. At the near bottom of the page is stated: "The photograph of OSO-8 under construction is courtesy of Hughes Aircraft Company. All other images are courtesy of NASA." --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Not sure why this was converted (poorly) from my original speedy nomination, but it's as clear-cut as one could hope for. NASA laid out a very specific statement that this particular image was a courtesy file from Hughes, and not their own work. Zap it. Huntster (t @ c) 23:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Yup, according to the above link, this is not NASA's own work. So it is possibly copyrignted. Masum Reza📞 23:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Generally I agree with you both. On Wikipedia there is "The initial seven (OSO 1–7) were built by Ball Aerospace, then known as Ball Brothers Research Corporation (BBRC), in Boulder Colorado.[1] OSO 8 was built by Hughes Space and Communications Company, in Culver City, California." The image on File:OSO4.gif appears to be from Ball Aerospace rather than from NASA. No NASA logo anywhere. Of course, there's no Ball Aerospace or Hughes Aircraft logos anywhere either. And both photos were on NASA sites, not on manufacturers' sites. --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of photographic copyright both photographs if taken by the respective contractor employees belong to the employee and probably the contractors. Both satellites were built under contracts funded by NASA. This appears to be the usual problem with NASA site usage of photographs such as APOD. Although APOD for 10 March 2009, for example, clearly states: "Credit & Copyright: Dale J. Martin (Massapoag Pond Obs.)" whereas HEASARC states: "The photograph of OSO-8 under construction is courtesy of Hughes Aircraft Company. All other images are courtesy of NASA.". The problem then is: are one or both images eligible for exemption from copyright infringement because they are on a NASA (US government) site which is Public Domain? Whatever you decide, I have a copy which if needed can be uploaded under Fair use. --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI: I sent an email to OSO-8 turns out great—Hughes News January 19, 1979 Transcribed by Faith Macpherson to see if the image is okay to be used on Commons for commercial use. It might take a few days to hear back. --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  1. Todd Neff (2010) From Jars to the Stars: How Ball Came to Build a Comet-Hunting Machine Denver, CO.: Earthview Media.

 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wir haben die Datei nun im svg-Format hochgeladen. GVB Bern (talk) 07:05, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Category:GVB (Amsterdam) and category:GVB (Graz) have both different logos. Category:GVB (Bern) does not exist. I do not find a .svg version. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - File:Gebäudeversicherung Bern Logo.svg. and https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Neues_GVB_Logo_svg.svg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure I agree this is PD-SIMPLE. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

woards and something looks like a spring or i don't know this is PD-SIMPLE.--EEIM (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, {{Pd-textlogo}} applies here because the logo effectivelly does not meet the threshold of originallity. Amitie 10g (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks like pd-simple to me FASTILY 20:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not agree with previous closure. The logo is not simple, it does not consist of simple geometrical figures. Try to name these geometrical shapes! Taivo (talk) 14:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be an invalid file. Also here: User:Dispenser/Transcode errors Estopedist1 (talk) 16:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in the Netherlands for applied art, industrial design, and models. Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually the owner of the organ which is located nowadays as a permanent exhibition installation in a Museum in Switzerland.I assume

Switzerland

According to article 27 of the Copyright Act (en/de/fr/it), works installed at or on publicly accessible places or ground may be pictured, and such pictures may be offered for sale, sold, transmitted, or otherwise published. The image must not be three-dimensional and it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original.

The works must be permanently installed, but for the purposes of the law, "permanent" means a fixed installation which may be temporary -- time limited -- but not "accidental", e.g. due to transport of the work.

For more information, see COM:CRT/Switzerland#Freedom of panorama.

Deutsch  English  español  sicilianu  македонски  русский  Nederlands  français  italiano  +/−

applies in the case of Decap.ogv. El Suizo (talk) 05:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per COM:FOP Switzerland freedom of panorama does not apply in interior spaces. --Green Giant (talk) 21:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]