Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Bild ist mit 2 unterschiedlichen Urheberrechten gekennzeichnet, einmal Copyright und einmal Creative Commons Mniklu (talk) 07:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright at source. --Yann (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 06:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
copy right problem Tsangkin1983 (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
copyright issue Tsangkin1983 (talk) 07:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Image of a non-notable person. I believe it's unuseful and out of the scope of this project. SirEdimon (talk) 07:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Account blocked for socking: Special:Contributions/Mvcg66b3r. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Go to www.bing.com 2001:4898:80E8:B:5AB7:975A:9711:F481 10:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --De728631 (talk) 19:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Reveals sensitive copyright US Navy information 103.255.6.251 23:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
personal photo by non-contributors Solomon203 (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedly deleted The watermark impiles that the image is not the user's own work. --MorganKevinJ(talk) 02:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
HuseynB2003 (talk) 20:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 03:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Миодраг Крагуљ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Mati-ekatarina-manastir-jovanje.jpg
- File:Антоније Ђурђевић.jpg
- File:Biljni-preparati-manastira-draca-koje-s-ljubavlju-i-uz-molitvu-prave-monahinje-na-celu-sa-igumanijom-jelenom-cuveni-su-sirom-srbije s.png
- File:Monahinja Evgenija 001.jpg
- File:Ранка Мишић.jpg
- File:Митрополит црногорско приморски Данило.jpg
- File:Julijan.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy: per nomination & apparent copyright violation. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Миодраг Крагуљ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vintage low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 16:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Skh sourav halder (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:Skh sourav halder-1.jpg
- File:Skh sourav halder.png.jpg
- File:Skh Sourav halder-1.jpg
- File:Skh sourav halder.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Skh sourav halder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, File:Ghazi Abdul Hakim.jpg is a photomontage, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 05:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Requested by the uploader. Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 04:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be withdrawn. --JuTa 13:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Redirected to File:Bunga Zinia.jpg as duplicate --JuTa 05:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Other 2600:1702:1C10:93B0:3D47:FA47:260:B081 12:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nominated for speedy deletion as an obvious copyright violation. GMGtalk 14:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-promotional uploads. Promotional text already removed from description.
Ubcule (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, not really educationally useful. Ubcule (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 18:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}} Poor-quality chemical ball-and-stick model; missing double bond at the oxygen atom in the ester group, hence incorrect file as well, also quite pixelated & jagged. Have File:Butyl-acetate-3D-balls.png as high-quality replacement among other ball-and-stick models in Category:Butyl acetate. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Low res and poor quality. Wostr (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)- Delete There are times we might only want to see the connectivity (not single vs double), but also the perspective is chosen poorly enough to obscure the presence of one of the hydrogens--no need for that arbitrary choice, better in alt. DMacks (talk) 00:54, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Not used. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading from this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 10:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image Ubcule (talk) 11:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope and/or spam
Ubcule (talk) 11:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
non-valid logo uploaded by an xwiki LTA (sock of Sol-lol Praxidicae (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Unused. Ankry (talk) 20:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused JPEG logo, should SVG if useful. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this file without correctly indicating Permission to use. Obtaining the correct permission will take significantly more than 7 days, so I am asking for an IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION. I will upload the file later when I have the correct Permission to use. William Ellison (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files of User:Megan McAllister
[edit]
Files are credited to Cheryle Van Scoy (#1) and Mimi Haddon (#2 and #3). Need their permission to license their photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Unknown person. Appears to be a vanity shot with no value for the Commons. Richard Avery (talk) 06:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Possibly from Whatsapp, no permission to reuse. 2 files are selfies.
- File:IMG-20190803-WA0012.jpg
- File:IMG-20190803-WA0013.jpg
- File:IMG-20190803-WA0009.jpg
- File:IMG-20190803-WA0006.jpg
- File:IMG-20190803-WA0011 (1).jpg
- File:IMG-20190805-WA0036.jpg
- File:IMG-20190803-WA0001.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Permission from photgrapher needed. 2 are selfies.
- File:Image aman 009.jpg
- File:Image aman 008 .jpg
- File:Image aman 007 .jpg
- File:Image aman 006.jpg
- File:Image aman 005 .jpg
- File:Image aman 004 .jpg
- File:Image Aman 003.jpg
- File:Image Aman 002.jpg
- File:Aman 001.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Permission from photographers needed, 3 are selfies.
- File:Image aman 11.jpg
- File:Image aman 10.jpg
- File:Image aman 9.jpg
- File:Image aman 008.jpg
- File:Image aman 6.jpg
- File:Image aman 5.jpg
- File:Image aman 004.jpg
- File:Image aman 3.jpg
- File:Image aman 2.jpg
- File:Image aman 1.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Image is from the internet http://asdfakos.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/134573-kaikki-meuhkaa-tulevasta , not "own work" by the uploader. kyykaarme (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
There is no doubt about it. The photograph is not by Laurikainen, it is not his "own work" and therefore the author is not User:Laurikainen. It cannot be licenced at all because Laurikainen does not hold the copyright himself. This file ought to be deleted promptly. --Pxos (talk) 20:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as not "own work" and unknown copyright status. Uploader has a history of making false claims. Jni (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maí Yandara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks and an image of the artist, the latter apparently copied from elsewhere on the internet and not own work.
- File:WhatsApp-Image-20160617.jpg
- File:Sem título - Marcos Amaro.jpg
- File:Dispositivos Insólitos.jpg
- File:Roda do Mundo.jpg
- File:Tava Verde Pra Mim.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Marcia Scherer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Image and its crop. One is obviously from WhatsApp, the other copies from that one. Neither is own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suffocatorcode (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another pair of images, original and crop, from WhatsApp, application. Not own work.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lorenaomar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Single subject uploader, very small images and then three that appear to be taken from WhatsApp, application. No indictions of own work.
- File:La escuelita.jpg
- File:Escuelita 1.jpg
- File:WhatsApp-Image-2018-03-22-at-17.12.44-3.jpg
- File:WhatsApp-Image-2018-03-22-at-17.12.35-1.jpg
- File:WhatsApp-Image-2018-03-22-at-17.12.34-1.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Do not appear to be own work of uploader, notice file sizes, names, letterboxing and artefacts.
- File:WhatsApp Image 2017-03-03 at 11.48.52 AM.jpg
- File:WhatsApp Image 2017-03-03 at 11.41.37 AM.jpg
- File:WhatsApp Image 2017-03-03 at 11.40.54 AM.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MUZAFFER AVNAŞ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems more like images collected from internet than own work. Small sizes, low quality, file name, etc.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical sound recording. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alex Suchkov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Personal images and/or out of scope.
- File:Lizzy Fenton Wedding.jpg
- File:LizzyFenton.jpg
- File:LizzyFento.jpg
- File:Denature.jpg
- File:Lizzy Fenton-flowers-RQ-114.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 17:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 1969, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received. --Jcb (talk) 09:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No data, looks like a screenshot of a video on the "Tour de France" Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- More infos, actually uploaded in high quality here 4 days before uploaded low quality here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2572.htm. Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not original work, uploaded in 2013 here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2069.htm Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo stolen from a user here, uploaded 4 days before here https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2572.htm / https://up.autotitre.com/8fbaf4a850.jpg Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Senthattiyapuram pudhur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Filenames, captions, sizes, and lack of meta suggest these images are from an application, not own work.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: More unused files. Commons is not a private photo album. NOTE: These files were used in now-deleted hoax articles by uploader and then again by their sockpuppet on en WP.
CactusWriter (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I fail to see how these documents about investments can have any relevance to the scope of this project.
- File:Jimenez Torres Investments.pdf
- File:Investments Vanguard Jorge Jimenez 15.pdf
- File:Acquisition.pdf
Herby talk thyme 08:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all. These appear to be part of an elaborate joke / hoax being perpetrated by the uploader to claim that Torres is the richest man in Puerto Rico. (See en:Draft:Jorge A. Jimenez Torres.) If the numbers in these documents were to be believed, they would make Jimenez the wealthiest man in the world; a claim which surely would have been uncovered by now and not need a new draft article. WikiDan61 (talk) 15:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Aaah and that draft has gone so "out of scope" too. Thanks for the link. --Herby talk thyme 16:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The draft article on en wp has now been deleted so these are out of scope and can be deleted. --Herby talk thyme 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The draft article on en wp has now been deleted so these are out of scope and can be deleted. --Herby talk thyme 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wantai Sopia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images.
Ubcule (talk) 18:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded from another user here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2572.htm Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded from another user here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2572.htm Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Again, no authorisation, uploaded here before by another user : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2572.htm Looks like "Alex" took many pictures from this online forum from random users. Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep @Jcb: I assume it is PD, see File:Location_Hangzhou_Bay_Bridge.PNG? — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Неверный редирект 85.140.5.182 15:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no file uploaded. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Неверный редирект 85.140.5.182 15:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no file uploaded. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
out of scope for Wikimedia Commons — billinghurst sDrewth 22:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:30, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Without EXIF data, these images are likely copyright violations. For example, File:MAHOTO2017.jpg, File:KAIWARE2017.jpg, and File:KAIWARE20172.jpg were previously published at spice.eplus.jp. The colored, un-cropped version of File:Obayashi2014.png was previously published at cinefil.tokyo.
- File:カリスマブラザーズufes.jpg
- File:KINKAKU 4314.jpg
- File:Obayashi2014.png
- File:A&W 1st.jpg
- File:KAIWARE2017.jpg
- File:KAIWARE20172.jpg
- File:MAHOTO2017.jpg
- File:MAXMURAI2015.jpg
- File:Pikotaro at Tokyo Auto Salon 20171214.jpg
- File:Jetdaisuke2017.jpg
- File:アバンティーず2017.jpg
- File:Riku 2017ufes.jpg
- File:YUUKAKINOSITA2017.jpg
- File:KAZUmasai 2017.jpg
- File:SETO2017.jpg
- File:HAJIME2017ufes.jpg
- File:TOKAIONAIR2017.jpg
- File:HIKARU201708.jpg
- File:水溜りボンド2017ufes.jpg
- File:HIKAKIN at UFES2017.jpg
- File:Nagaoka kango senmon school.jpg
- File:新潟近代美術館.jpg
- File:Harashin miyazeki2.jpg
- File:Harashin miyazeki.jpg
- File:Aキューブ.jpg
- File:芦原温泉駅エレベーター.jpg
- File:セブンイレブンおみやげ処芦原.jpg
- File:Awaraonseneki syomen.jpg
- File:Awara station kaisatsu.jpg
- File:Tenrikyo raihaizyo20160313.jpg
- File:Tenri station 20160313.jpg
- File:Tenrikyo kyokaihonbu rouka.jpg
153.230.45.146 03:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: nominated files from the top list: copyvio. Other files from this user, like File:Tenrikyo raihaizyo20160313.jpg, are not obviously a copyvio -> keep. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Versions of these images have been found elsewhere, with date preceding Commons upload. User has already had images deleted previously.
(Thank you to えのきだたもつ (talk · contribs), who drew my attention to this when they uploaded another image by the same user at Commons:Deletion requests/File:のん三陸鉄道201903.jpg.)
- File:HT201903.jpg
- File:大原優乃201908.jpg
- Modified version of image uploaded to Twitter several days prior - [2] - Obviously part of a set - Again, there is no clear connection between uploader and account.
- File:丸の内署交通安全イベント2019.jpg
- File:Kaito2019.jpg
- File:横山由依201901.jpg
- Part of set at Twitter - Two months prior
This is just a small selection of images of (what I assume are) members of idol bands uploaded by same user. I have not been able to check all user's uploads of idols, and some do not return matches via Google Images. However, if these are provable copyright violations, we should strongly consider deleting other, similar-looking idol images from the same user under our precautionary principle.
Ubcule (talk) 19:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, grabbed from internet. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Thanks for Ubcule (talk · contribs)'s request. I also found these photos are from twitter:
- File:亀梨201903.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter by deleting the waterprint
- File:中村倫也2019帝王賞.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter by deleting the waterprint
- File:櫻井翔201906.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter by deleting the waterprint--そらみみ (talk) 01:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Adding:
Adding:
Adding:
- File:水溜りボンド2017ufes.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:吉村洋文2019.jpg - from Mainichi Shimbun, taken by 山崎一輝.
- File:TwilightCity2017fukase.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:百田夏菜子20170203.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:葵わかな201802.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:松井珠理奈2019年6月.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:錦戸亮201806.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:村上信五201806.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:Yoko201806.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:桜庭ななみ201802.jpg - The same photo on Twitter--そらみみ (talk) 10:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Adding:
- File:石原さとみ201906.jpg - The same photo on Instagram
- File:高良健吾201904.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
- File:小嶋陽菜2018.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:マギー201906.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:浜辺美波イベント2019.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:Sayane2019.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:髙橋ひかる201905.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:吉本実憂2019.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:平野紫耀花のち晴れ.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:ベッキー201908.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:ガクト201908.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:MaiKuraki201902.jpg - Part of a photo on Twitter
- File:Mariko201806.jpg - The same photo on Twitter
These photos are from some different people's account.--そらみみ (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC) Adding:
- File:橋本環奈201712.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:中村静香201908.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:Yoshioka201901.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:新川優愛2019.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:川村ゆきえ201904.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:本田望結201901.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:小松菜奈201811.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:吉谷彩子201812.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:上戸彩201811.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:綾瀬はるか2018会津祭り.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:横浜流星2019.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:清水尋也201904.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:中川大志201812.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:Hiroshitachi2019.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:鈴木201903.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:峯岸みなみ201903.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:哀川翔2019.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:北乃きい2018.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:凱旋祝賀パレード2018.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:井上咲楽201906.jpg - Photo from Twitter
- File:山本舞香2019.jpg - Photo from Twitter--そらみみ (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @そらみみ: ; That's a lot of work! Well spotted, and thank you for your effort in catching all those. Ubcule (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Ubcule: Thanks. But there are still some files uploaded by him/her (e.g. File:HIKAKIN2018.jpg) that I can't judge whether taken by himself or copied from somewhere else.--そらみみ (talk) 09:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- @そらみみ: ; If the suspected images you mention are obviously similar in style and content to those we have already proven to be copyright violations, then they should be considered for deletion anyway under the precautionary principle.
- @Ubcule: Thanks. But there are still some files uploaded by him/her (e.g. File:HIKAKIN2018.jpg) that I can't judge whether taken by himself or copied from somewhere else.--そらみみ (talk) 09:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- @そらみみ: ; That's a lot of work! Well spotted, and thank you for your effort in catching all those. Ubcule (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- (In this case, that would imply similarly professional-looking images of celebrities at media/PR events and similar, but not (e.g.) uploader's images of railway stations).Ubcule (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think suspicious files should be checked after the files above being deleted. There are too many pictures now.そらみみ (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- (In this case, that would imply similarly professional-looking images of celebrities at media/PR events and similar, but not (e.g.) uploader's images of railway stations).Ubcule (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Adding:
- File:益若つばさ2019.jpg - Twitter
- File:岩井勇気2019.jpg - Twitter
- File:壇蜜2019.jpg - Twitter--そらみみ (talk) 06:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:いちかわスポーツフェスタ松木.jpg - Half of this picture on Twitter--そらみみ (talk) 06:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Grabbed from internet, mostly twitter and instagram. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)
[edit]A considerable number of this user's uploads have already been deleted for proven copyright violation. (See previous deletion requests for same user, above).
They were all images of famous Japanese people (often members of idol bands). The photographs all had a similar style, as if they were professionally-shot PR or press photographs with a good viewpoint.
Many of this user's images that remain are very similar in both content and style, and this raises my suspicions. Although there is no definitive evidence that these are copyvios, I am very sceptical whether they can be trusted and wonder whether we should consider them in light of Commons' "Precautionary principle".
Some images (e.g. railway stations) are not included in this deletion request, as they are less likely to be copyright violations. (No images similar to them were deleted previously).
As they were previously involved in this case, そらみみ (talk · contribs) may wish to contribute their opinion here too. Thank you.
Ubcule (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Automatic translation:
- このユーザーのアップロードのかなりの数は、著作権侵害の立証のために既に削除されています。 （上記の同じユーザーの以前の削除要求を参照してください）。
- それらはすべて有名な日本人（多くの場合アイドルバンドのメンバー）の画像でした。写真はすべて、似たようなスタイルを持っていて、まるでプロの写真を撮ったPRか、良い視点のプレス写真のようでした。
- 残っているこのユーザーの画像の多くは、コンテンツとスタイルの両方で非常に似ており、これは私の疑念を引き起こします。これらがcopyviosであるという明確な証拠はありませんが、それらが信頼できるかどうかは非常に懐疑的であり、 Commons '"Precautionary Principles"に照らして考慮すべきかどうか疑問に思います。
- 一部の画像（鉄道駅など）は、著作権侵害の可能性が低いため、この削除リクエストには含まれていません。 （それらに類似した画像は以前に削除されていません）。
- File:野呂佳代201904.jpg
- File:畠山愛理201904.jpg
- File:福生七夕まつり2019じゅんいち.jpg
- File:オリラジ201804.jpg
- File:にこるん201812.jpg
- File:岡田准一2014年2月.jpg
- File:藤森慎吾RADIO FISH2018.png
- File:中田敦彦ライブ2019.png
- File:しずるトークライブ2019.jpg
- File:勝俣州和2018.png
- File:健太郎2017.png
- File:Kobukuro2017.jpg
- File:Hamada2017.png
- File:Downtown2017.png
- File:Matsumoto2017.jpg
- File:MIZU2018.jpg
- File:MIKI2018.jpg
- File:Kazu2018.jpg
- File:HIKAKIN2018.jpg
- File:SEIKIN2018.jpg
- File:カリスマブラザーズufes.jpg
- File:Jetdaisuke2017.jpg
- File:アバンティーず2017.jpg
- File:Riku 2017ufes.jpg
- File:YUUKAKINOSITA2017.jpg
- File:KAZUmasai 2017.jpg
- File:SETO2017.jpg
- File:HAJIME2017ufes.jpg
- File:TOKAIONAIR2017.jpg
- File:HIKAKIN at UFES2017.jpg
- File:Pikotaro at Tokyo Auto Salon 20171214.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 19:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Although Google can't find these pictures from other websites now, I think it's reasonable to delete all these pictures.--そらみみ (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion above; COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JJMC89 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative of a copyright work This need a proper DR. Yann (talk) 08:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know what a DR is, but this deletion request must have been caused by an appeal I have made on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_August_24#24_August_2019 . This is an ordinary picture of a an ordinary historical marker like thousands on Commons. If it is decided to delete this one I assume it will lead to the deletion of the other almost 24,000 plus historical marker pictures on Commons now. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?sort=relevance&search=Historical+markers&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1&ns0=1 I'm not sure if I am expected to make an argument in defense of publishing this picture on Commons, but if so I will start with this: This marker is in a public park and I was standing in this public park when I took the picture. Wikipedia's article on Photography and the Law says a picture taken from a public place or of an object in a public place is legal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_and_the_law Wiki name (talk) 13:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Wiki name: DR means deletion request. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- From my longer arguments at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_August_24#Alta_Loma%2C_Texas:
- I've uploaded photos of historical plaques, and included in the commons page a transcription of the text. I make it clear that this is just a rendering of the image into text form. I'm not a copyright expert, but it seems to me this isn't even an issue of fair use, but simply a description of the image to make it more useful both to people who are blind, and to search engines, in much the same way that somebody might write, "There is a girl standing under a tree. She is wearing a blue dress".
RoySmith (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyvio - it's honestly far too technical and creates an absurd result, but the absurd result is still a clear result: the license provided by the State of Texas does conflict with our license, and the text was added in 1994 so the text is still under copyright. SportingFlyer (talk) 04:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- What's a copyvio? The photograph itself, or the transcription of the text? RoySmith (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- See Commons:Derivative work. If you take a photo of something that's under copyright, your photo is a "derivative work" under that same copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- What's a copyvio? The photograph itself, or the transcription of the text? RoySmith (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per JJMC89, SportingFlyer, Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/04#Plaques, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glendale Comfort Woman Plaque.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Palisades Park Comfort Women Plaque.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Southfield Comfort Woman Plaque.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The text is long enough that it is copyrightable, either as a transcription or a photograph of that text. In the US, many historical plaques may have been published without copyright notice when that would put it in the public domain, or might not have enough text to be copyrightable. This is too recent (post-1978 and post-1989) to need a copyright notice, and is quite verbose.--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- So, you're saying I need to use File:Bank Note Printing Plant Landmark Plaque Censored.jpg? RoySmith (talk) 22:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No no one is saying you have to do that. However if you wish to contribute to Commons regularly, I suggest it's a good idea to make a good faith effort to familiarize yourself with guidelines such as are found at Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative work. That way you can avoid potential problems and you won't be so surprised when an issue like this comes up. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- My snark aside, would that at least meet the letter and spirit of the law? RoySmith (talk) 23:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Letter of the law, I suppose so. However other than an example of text being redacted due to copyright, such images may not have much use on Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- My snark aside, would that at least meet the letter and spirit of the law? RoySmith (talk) 23:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No no one is saying you have to do that. However if you wish to contribute to Commons regularly, I suggest it's a good idea to make a good faith effort to familiarize yourself with guidelines such as are found at Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative work. That way you can avoid potential problems and you won't be so surprised when an issue like this comes up. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Text of four paragraphs dated 1994. Sorry, under copyright per US law. Unless the entity that created it has released it under a free license, it is not free for Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- So, has the decision been made on whether to delete my photograph of the historical marker or not? I'm unable to understand from the text above. Wiki name (talk) 14:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. Sorry, such are Wikimedia Commons guidelines, which in cases like this follows US copyright law. (Since I'd been voting and commenting, I was waiting for someone else to close this, but since it's a clear case and we have a bit of a backlog in deletion listings, I'm going ahead and closing it myself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Doritos
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
- File:2019-02-07 13 00 36 A bag of Cool Ranch Doritos in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-07 13 44 12 A bag of Nacho Cheese Doritos in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:Doritos Rainbow on the Mexico City Pride 2016.jpg
- File:Doritos section at Best Price.jpg
- File:Pacote de Doritos sabor pimenta - com flash.jpg
- File:Snack chips.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 00:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Doritos
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.
- File:Bags of Doritos flavors - 2.jpg
- File:Bags of Doritos flavors -1.jpg
- File:Cool Ranch Doritos.jpg
- File:Dinamita-1.jpg
- File:Dinamita.jpg
- File:Flamas.jpg
- File:Nacho Cheese Doritos.jpg
- File:Spicy Nacho.jpg
- File:Spicy Sweet Chili.jpg
- File:Sriracha.jpg
- File:Tapatio 2.jpg
- File:Tapatio-1.jpg
- File:Tapatio.jpg
- File:Ultimate Cheddar.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 23:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
FILIDOR ORTIZ POBLETE 190.22.59.19 20:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Why should be deleted?. --Juan Villalobos (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- also crop file:Jeffree Star 2018 cropped.png
Small photo without metadata, per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata the file comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Failed to meet Wikimedia Commons standards for association football kits (Club badges, sponsor logos, and manufacturer logos should never be included). Ben5218 (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Failed to meet Wikimedia Commons standards for association football kits (Club badges, sponsor logos, and manufacturer logos should never be included). Ben5218 (talk) 14:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep under COM:INUSE so long as it remains in use on ar:نادي الشرقية, azb:الشرقیه فوتبال کولوبو, en:El Sharkia SC, and fr:El Sharkia SC. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 00:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- I've replaced all articles containing them with new files created by me. This file is now eligible for deletion. Ben5218 (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 00:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 00:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 00:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan for artistic works, this sculpture was erected by Hotai Tomoyuki (保田井智之) who is living person. Because the copyright still exists, unfortunately Commons can not hold this file. See here. Y.haruo (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=685142800#File:Assamese-alphabet-consonants.png){kind=link}
Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal image with file name showing origin at other application.' Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Size, low quality and meta add up to the appearance that this image was taken from the WhatsApp application and is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dubious claim of own work, see file size, lack of quality and title. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Artwork needs permission of creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
and
- File:مجموعة من الابيات والقصائد الشعرية بعنوان خواطر شعرية من تأليف عباس شوكت طربوش العميري.pdf
- File:عنوان الكتاب نهج البلاغة نظرةٌ وتحقيق.pdf
- File:النظام الاجتماعي في القوات المسلحة.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
The author of the article (me) is also having the copyright of the picture as he is also the photorapher. Sorry I did'nt comment on that on publishing in the first place. The picture is therfore free to use as the text. "Unused text document of questionable notability." I do not understand the meaning of ths statement. Does this has to be specificly addressed to cancel the deletion issue?
I hope this is the right place to respond and oppose to the request on deletion. I think it could be made much clearer how to communicate in this matter. I was reading the long list of items having deletion requests to find my item and name to respond there but is was not the right place I guess. John-Christer Lindhé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jclindhe (talk • contribs) 13:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Please upload photo separately from text. Text belongs to Wikipedia or other relevant WMF project. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I assume not own work — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyrught violation https://www.google.com/search?q=sergio+le%C3%B3n+jugador+del+betis&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJpTkeXMpbgFIaiwELEKjU2AQaBAg9CEIMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEii5BZEckBzGEO4QuAXkH-8Q6hDfH6g62i3ZLfYuqTrlKfAk-y7wLuEuGjAu_1e4i-K4XzudpsbZ6K1NfUFsIkOZYbuTy_19oTPtW6_17wjdHcQpFThmEToe8LTdhEgBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBAQa7IwM&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiH4N_-7pvkAhWhunEKHWzbAjwQ2A4ILigB&biw=1920&bih=937 Brgesto (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete no permission — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Source = "Jean Lafitte, Henri Féraud, Langues d'oc, langues de France - aspects politiques et juridiques, linguistiques et sociolinguistiques en association avec le Conservatoire du patrimoine de Gascogne, l'Institut béarnais et Gascon et l'Unioun Prouvençalo, éd. Princi Negue editour, 2006. ISBN 2.84618.320.1." - no permission. Jcb (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Agree And the text inside is wrong : Languedocien shoud appear in place of Occitan, and Gascon should appear in the dark blue area (Limousin, Languedocien and Gascon are Occitan). Jack ma (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete copyright violation — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as above and out of scope — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also hardly useful due to very low resolution.
Jcb (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as above — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This is clearly not his own work, this has been on various sites for years now. It's a cropped out image of a larger picture. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I hate wrong own-claims — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Logo uploaded only as advertising, not in use, the uploader's only contribution, has no educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 21:06, 24 September 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:LOGO-THAI-FIT.png: Logo uploaded only as advertising, not in use, the uploader's only contribution, has no educational value. --Krdbot 00:47, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
not used. No description. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 06:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
دریافتی (=received), not taken by Mehr photographers Hanooz 02:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Hanooz: درود بر شما
این عکس را از مهر برداشتم — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gm110m (talk • contribs) 06:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Gm110m: سلام. درست است ولی عکسهایی که با عناوینی مثل «دریافتی» منتشر میشوند را معمولاً عکاسان خبرگزاری نگرفتهاند. مثلاً این عکس را بابک برزویه برداشته که عکاس آزاد است و برای مهر کار نمیکند. Hanooz 19:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Alexander Pylnev, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Вид на Воскресенский храм в Воронеже, 2009 г.jpg
- File:На хопре, 1997 г.jpg
- File:Зимний вечер, 1986 г.jpg
- File:Ранняя весна, окресности Новохоперского, 1986 г.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- And more:
--Drakosh (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Авторские права на фотографии принадлежат фотографам и их наследникам, а не изображённому на снимке лицу.
- File:А. Пыльнев, 70-е г.jpg
- File:Пыльнева Е. А. , мать художника за работой, 70-е г.jpg
- File:А. Пыльнев, 2015 г.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 21:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:А._Пыльнев,_70-е_г.jpg” under ticket:2019092010007092. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:А._Пыльнев,_2015_г.jpg” under ticket:2019092010007092. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Пыльнева_Е._А._,_мать_художника_за_работой,_70-е_г.jpg” under ticket:2019092010007092. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Вид_на_Воскресенский_храм_в_Воронеже,_2009_г.jpg” under ticket:2019092010007092. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:На_хопре,_1997_г.jpg” under ticket:2019092010007092. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Зимний_вечер,_1986_г.jpg” under ticket:2019092010007092. --Dogad75 (talk) 23:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Ранняя_весна,_окресности_Новохоперского,_1986_г.jpg” under ticket:2019092010007092. --Dogad75 (talk) 23:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
== [[:File:Shane Nigam.png]] == {{Autotranslate|1=File:Shane Nigam.png|2=Still from an unfree video|3=|base=Copyvionote}} Davidjose365 (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by JGHowes. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
1 Microsoft Way, Redmond 2001:4898:80E8:0:3E73:5676:D5B7:5561 16:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason given — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 00:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
- File:Haldiram's Tam Tam snack.JPG
- File:Haldiram's Mathri from Rajasthan.JPG
- File:Rice Bran Oil (1 Litre).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ƏXPLICIT 00:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Credited to this professional photographer, without permission indicated. And here it is marked copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
The metadata states "Copyright holder: Copyright holder: Alex Kaplan Photo Video Photobooth www dot (website)." Need permission from the copyright holder to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded as "own work", but then the uploader changed credit to "author granted permission". Need clarification as to who took the photo, and if not the uploader, need permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Subject of the photo may be the uploader, considering the user name, but the metadata states "Copyright holder: © 2015 Florian Voggeneder". Need that person's permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Not free. Situation similar to other uploads by the user, all deleted. -- Asclepias (talk) 06:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused advertising image for out of scope article, which has been deleted.. 85.212.220.136 06:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JDeanWilliams (talk · contribs)
[edit]Be found at https://www.facebook.com/WCICmedia/photos/a.10156494644969357/10156494645384357. Not release under CC license
AlexLeeCN (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also useless due to very poor quality. This could be anything, even lipstick. Jcb (talk) 09:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Are you the photographer? The picture was published previously at [4]. Yann (talk) 10:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Not uploaders own work, published here [5]. Htm (talk) 10:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
There are the obvious three points of file information that are wrong: 1) Source: It is not "own work" as it has been found on the Internet. 2) The author is not Laurikainen because he has definitely not taken the photograph himself as it is over 100 years old. 3) Licence: Laurikainen is not the copyright holder and cannot give any license to any photographs. I was a bit lazy and arrogant and just tried to cut off the false information with an axe since it is so blatantly incorrect, but it was not the proper way. --Pxos (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete, per nomination. --MiPe (talk) 15:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Jni (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
In absence of background, assumed to be a derivative copyright violation of the original artwork. ("In Ermangelung von Hintergrundinformationen wird davon ausgegangen, dass es sich um eine abgeleitete Urheberrechtsverletzung der Originalvorlage handelt.") Ubcule (talk) 10:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The drawing is by Torsten Boisman, and according to this [6] he was still alive in 1954 and therefore the time limit of 70 years has not run out. Pxos (talk) 11:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's released in Finna by Museovirasto (musketti.M012:HK18930324:1) and licence is CC-BY-4.0. I updated the file information. --Zache (talk) 14:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Torsten Boisman has made the drawing and died apparently in 1958. So his descendants hold the copyright for 70 years, i.e. until 2029. It cannot be licensed as CC-BY by an organisation that keeps the original drawing in their possession or has taken a photograph of the drawing. It simply is not free. --Pxos (talk) 14:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC) Addendum: If Boisman family have given away their copyright to Museovirasto, that is another matter. But we cannot know that. --Pxos (talk) 14:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- You are inventing your own rules from thin air. The Finnish Heritage Agency is easily good enough source for us related to the medata of the images. --Zache (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- So I have made up the concept of copyright altogether? --Pxos (talk) 14:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep The Finnish Heritage Agency has released this image for free use, among thousands of other images released, announcement here. Antilope (talk) 18:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment The image is also available in the Europeana Collections (initiative of the European Union), and marked there similarly for free reuse, CC BY 4.0. Antilope (talk) 23:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't anyone take into account the fact that this is a photograph of a drawing? There are two different scopes of copyright: 1) The copyright that applies to the work of art; 2) the right to hand out licenses to the photographs that have been taken by someone. I have, hanging on my wall, a portrait of my grandfather. It is a painting from the 1950's and as far as I know, the artist died in the 1970's. If I take a photograph of that painting, all I can do is to release the photograph into public domain (by releasing it under CC-0 for example). Taking a photo of an oil painting does not and it very well cannot alter the copyright status of the painting itself. --Pxos (talk) 08:49, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- As you can see from the image, it has the markings S.M.Y. F.F.F. These markings stand for Suomen Muinaismuisto-yhdistys (Finnish), Finska Fornminnesföreningen (Swedish). In other words, the drawing has been made for The Finnish Antiquarian Society. Between 1871 and 1901 the society organized so-called art history expeditions documenting churches, castle ruins, manors and public buildings. As a stipendiary of the society, Torsten Boisman, a student, was doing similar documentation in 1893 (see [7]) in the Tavastia region. The drawing of the Sysmä church was made by him in 1893, and very clearly for the Finnish Antiquarian Society. I see no reason to doubt that the copyrights related to the art historical documentation have been transferred to the society, and subsequently to The Finnish Heritage Agency, because it has recently released the image for free reuse under CC BY 4.0. —Antilope 18:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC) [Edit: removed some incorrect speculation.] Antilope (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
E-mail from Museovirasto: Tosiaan kyseisen teoksen tekijän Torsten Boismanin (1872-1958) tekijänoikeus on voimassa. Pahoittelen oikeuksienhallintaan liittyvää virhettä. Poistamme kuvan verkkopalveluista. Teoksen käyttöoikeus edellyttää käyttöluvan saamista tekijänoikeudenhaltijalta tahi sitä edustavalta taholta. From this I gather that Museovirasto did not have the legal competence to grant free reuse (CC BY 4.0), and did that in error. They also say they are going to remove the file (it still is there [8]). If it disappears from Musketti, I would take that as a strong indication that the license is not valid. We'll see. --Jmk (talk) 13:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- The picture has disappeared from Musketti: [9] gives "Tapahtui virhe". The stance of Museovirasto seems clear: They no longer grant CC BY 4.0, and they did not have the competence to do it in the first place. The claim of a CC BY 4.0 license should now be removed, and the picture too. If someone now adds a CC BY 4.0 claim to the file, they will be doing that on their own risk. --Jmk (talk) 16:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joseph Fineberg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos initially shot in Japan, not own work. Why a
- File:ברוך פינברג.jpg
- File:ברוך פינברג - זוכה מדלית הארד בהטלת כידון במשחקי אסיה - טוקיו 1958.jpg
- File:ברוך פינברג במשחקי אסיה - האצטדיון האולימפי בטוקיו מאי 1958.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erstbesinns (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Hans Mocznay (d. 1996), permission of hisq heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
.jpg){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment by uploader: The two works shown by the images are owned and possessed by our family. My wife Regine Söding is the niece of Hans Mocznay and these works were given to us as presents by Hans himself while he was still alive. The photos were made by us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erstbesinns (talk • contribs) 15:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Erstbesinns: Owning an artwork doesn't mean you have the right to reproduce it. Is your wife the heiress of Hans Mocznay? If so please have her sending a permission, if not please have the copyright holders sending it. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- I, Regine Söding, am the niece and heiress of Hans Mocznay, and I am the owner of the two works and creator of the photos of them that my husband ('erstbesinns') has uploaded ("Desdemona", "Zeitungsleser"). Herewith I grant permission to Wikipedia to publish them as requested. Regine Söding, Ulmenweg 41A, D-15711 Königs Wusterhausen, Germany. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erstbesinns (talk • contribs) 09:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Erstbesinns: Permission for Wikipedia only is insufficient. Please follow COM:OTRS instructions. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- I, Regine Söding, am the niece and heiress of Hans Mocznay, and I am the owner of the two works and creator of the photos of them that my husband ('erstbesinns') has uploaded ("Desdemona", "Zeitungsleser"). Herewith I grant permission to Wikipedia to publish them as requested. Regine Söding, Ulmenweg 41A, D-15711 Königs Wusterhausen, Germany. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erstbesinns (talk • contribs) 09:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Erstbesinns: Owning an artwork doesn't mean you have the right to reproduce it. Is your wife the heiress of Hans Mocznay? If so please have her sending a permission, if not please have the copyright holders sending it. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Patrick, sorry for the confusion. It's my first attempt at Wikipedia so I was unaware of the licencing procedures. Okay, now my wife has sent the required eMail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Meanwhile,I thank you for your patience! Erstbesinns (talk) 19:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019082510003043 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Hans_Mocznay_-_Desdemona.jpg” under ticket:2019082510003043. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Hans_Mocznay_-_Zeitungsleser_(Bronze).jpg” under ticket:2019082510003043. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per otrs. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Why the file is described "Google maps"? Is it hint, that the photo isn't own work, but taken from Google? Small size, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Evidence this is not the work of the uploader and source page at http://installation1to2001.blogspot.com/ gives no indication of public domain release MilborneOne (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in Italy, copyrighted work by Louise Giblin, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- See the talkpage of the uploader. He gives answer.Rots61 (talk) 16:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- This is not true. Photo was taken during the biennial in florence, where photos are permitted. It is an installation view with photos by two artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Art-Culture-Languages (talk • contribs) 14:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Art-Culture-Languages: The right to take photos doesn't mean the right to copy them without the artist's permission. Please refer to the Italian law. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- This is not true. Photo was taken during the biennial in florence, where photos are permitted. It is an installation view with photos by two artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Art-Culture-Languages (talk • contribs) 14:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Very small file, no EXIF data. Please upload the original image from your camera. Yann (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Where image has been shot and why it is public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Stated license questionable. Official Artwork of the Videogame Elex (THQ Nordic) Mielas (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
It's a copyrighted AP picture with no evidence of permission being given. It's lifted from here: https://www.masslive.com/patriots/2018/01/is_former_new_england_patriots_1.html Jeffrey Beall (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
It was used with permission from the team itself. The team photographer supplied the image because Jeffrey Beall is a troll who keeps deleting all images as being without permission.
He's a cunt. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:701:C280:6C70:A44F:8731:331:A5A3 (talk) 03:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Pabuji dham Bhuwari.jpg
- File:Bhuwari dham.jpg
- File:Bhuwari.jpg
- File:Bhuwaridham.jpg
- File:Bhuwari Dham.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete All, xwiki spam, image of no educational value. --Cohaf (talk) 06:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
No explanation as to what this picture represents; without this, it is meaningless and out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 17:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Icons in the background therfore derviative work->copyright violation — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: I'd argue against deletion if it were on that basis alone. The icons are in the background- and indeed many are partially obscured- and clearly not the intended focus. That arguably makes them de minimis.
- However, I should make clear that I'm still in favour of deleting it for the original reason I gave above(!) Ubcule (talk) 13:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Selfie from non-contributing user whose only edits are WP:NOTHOST misuse as personal webspace at hi.wikipedia. Ubcule (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image (presumed selfie). Ubcule (talk) 17:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Apparent self-promotion. Ubcule (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Evidence of use before upload here. *Looks* like commercial clip art. Only contribution from drive-by uploader increases suspicion that this is copyvio. Ubcule (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
User photo not used. Out of scope. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 20:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 20:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 20:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 20:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 20:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 20:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- also file:La Plaque mémoire - Patrick Bloche entouré d'élus et de Bernard Casnin architecte.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in France and the photos violate text author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 20:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- The uploader (the architecte Bernard Casnin, who is evidently not the photographer of the second file) knows the author of the texte and the photographer. I signaled him the possibility of two OTRS-tickets for each photo, which there will be taken care of (this diff), please wait. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The two files can be deleted, the OTRS-tickets shall not come. --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
-2019-08-27T11:05:00.000Z-File:Plaque_mémoire_Histoire_du_11ème.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 20:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I have to agree. While the photo licence at Flickr is ok, this is a derivative work of a non-free object. The actual modelling and painting scheme of the dinosaur results from the original artist's creativity making it an original piece of work- Delete per COM:TOYS. De728631 (talk) 00:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The copyrights lie on the 3D object and mold. Showing a 2D photo of a toy does not infringe the copyrights of the toymaker (in contrast to copying the 3D mold and using it to create an unlicensed copy). MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 10:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- This is wrong. The 2D photo infringes on the copyright of the original 3D model the same way a photo of a sculpture or architecture infringes on copyright if there is no freedom of panorama. We regurarily have to delete images of 3D artwork from countries without freedom of panorama. This case is exactly the same, only the original item is much smaller in scale. De728631 (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- From where I come, a 2D photography of 3D artworks are allowed and not considered a copyright infringement. You call this "freedom of panorama" but the general principle covers 3D objects which are not necessarily structures or street statues, such as cars, consumer products, toys etc. MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 19:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Freedom of panorama applies only to works that are permanently displayed in public. And we also need to consider the legal situation in the United States where the Commons files are hosted. Toys can be copyrighted there (and usually are). To quote from COM:TOYS: "Just as you cannot upload pictures of a sculpture by Picasso, you cannot upload photographs of Mickey Mouse or Pokémon figures. ... 'Other than the portrayal of a real airplane, a toy airplane, like a painting, has no intrinsic utilitarian function.'" De728631 (talk) 21:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- From where I come, a 2D photography of 3D artworks are allowed and not considered a copyright infringement. You call this "freedom of panorama" but the general principle covers 3D objects which are not necessarily structures or street statues, such as cars, consumer products, toys etc. MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 19:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- This is wrong. The 2D photo infringes on the copyright of the original 3D model the same way a photo of a sculpture or architecture infringes on copyright if there is no freedom of panorama. We regurarily have to delete images of 3D artwork from countries without freedom of panorama. This case is exactly the same, only the original item is much smaller in scale. De728631 (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: A photograph of a copyrighted sculpture (which this is) infrines on the sculptures copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, the uploader is a hoaxmaster and I suspect here another hoax. Taivo (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete for above reasons. Exactly same photo (with same sitting man) can be found on various websites ([10], [11]).--Phso2 (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aavitus as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: uploader request (me). Thanks.. Uploader's request is a valid reason during first week after upload. Here 3 years have passed. Taivo (talk) 20:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Disagree No good reason invoked to delete it. This work depicts a priori correct linguistic limits and this file can be used in fr:wiki. Or duplicate with File:Dialectes occitans.png ? Jack ma (talk) 06:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arbajshaikh4242 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be used on en.wiki for self promo
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arbajshaikh4242 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
copyright infringement, it is a product of Kunming Youth Travel Agency, see the upper right of the image 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 21:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that image has been published more than 50 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Image is from 1971. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. →AzaToth 21:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
dubious own work. kkwong's from https://www.facebook.com/hkftu.kkwong/photos/a.1109029309135983/1392437954128449/ .
Roy17 (talk) 22:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 23:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Probably taken from here, but there is no attribution info there either. --MarioGom (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep 1919, photographer unknown, "Polish front": {{PD-old-70-1996}}. Vysotsky (talk) 09:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, PD-old cannot be used if there is significant doubt that the author would have died over 70 years ago. We have defined the limits of 'significant doubt' for cases like this as 120 years from creation. 120 years have not yet passed since 1919. Jcb (talk) 14:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Even with that, I don't think anybody did enough due dilligence to say that photographer is unknown. I assume this photo was scanned by someone from a book or an archive that we did not identify yet. --MarioGom (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, PD-old cannot be used if there is significant doubt that the author would have died over 70 years ago. We have defined the limits of 'significant doubt' for cases like this as 120 years from creation. 120 years have not yet passed since 1919. Jcb (talk) 14:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 00:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 00:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
This corrupted image has been replaced with File:Pasir ris hawker centre.jpg Whpq (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- I did not understand why this image has issue. Please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shekar brother (talk • contribs)
Speedy delete per CSD#F7. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep.. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.255.6.91 (talk) 20:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, bottom portion is corrupted. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Functional duplicate of File:Circle sign blank.svg. Instead of outright deletion, this file should redirect to Circle sign blank.svg. –Fredddie™ 04:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- File:Elongated circle blank 2-digit.svg is another file that is a functional duplicate. This one should redirect to Circle sign blank.svg as well. –Fredddie™ 04:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate 103.6.130.245 04:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no duplicate found. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
The pyramid can't be considered as DM in this file. Thus violating COM:FOP France. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
No es la casa del almirante, es la fachada del palacio decanal de Tudela https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Palacio_Decanal._Tudela.jpg Un cordial saludo (talk) 06:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK. Pero entonces se trata de un error de identificación y no una subida improcedente. La solicitud de borrado carece de sentido.Zarateman (talk) 08:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Update the description and use {{Rename}} instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Vale, falta el botón, identificación incorrecta. Gracias por el apunte. --Un cordial saludo (talk) 10:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Es el Palacio Decanal ( museo) de Tudela) Un cordial saludo (talk) 06:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK. Pero entonces se trata de un error de identificación y no una subida improcedente. La solicitud de borrado carece de sentido.Zarateman (talk) 08:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Update the description and use {{Rename}} instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
This is obviously a duplicate of File:Allerheiligen-Kirche - Elsdorf (Lower Saxony).jpg by the same author, but of inferior quality. Telford (talk) 09:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Possible COPYVIO Bagas Chrisara (talk) 09:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Is this person famous? Lack of background, "asian championship", Ubcule (talk) 10:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
too many edits, uploaded a new version Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded by File:Utsyn mot Øverskreien og Olterudelva fra Kraby 21-08-19 1.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Explanation is needed about how the flag is in our project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://twitter.com/QuickGabi/status/1127203152967667712/photo/1 Uploaded by subject, HR with EXIF, permission needed, but proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 11:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
unlikely a serlfie of the person depicted JuTa 12:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. 223.24.190.21 12:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
Deleted: low quality, superseded by File:3.20.2 (Road sign).svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. 223.24.190.21 12:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
Deleted: low quality, superseded by File:3.20.3 (Road sign).svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! 223.24.190.21 12:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: unclear DN. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Duplicate of another file 3.24 Russian road sign.svg of (almost) the same standard. KorneySan (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
上傳者请求删除，原因：上传错误版本，申请删除后重新上传 Tyg728 (talk) 13:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
履歴整理のための一時的な削除（削除後、ただちに再アップロード予定） Hksn127 (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
投稿者です。ファイルデータに技術的な問題があるため、履歴含めいったん削除し再アップロードする必要が出てきました。よろしくお願いいたします。（削除後、ただちに再アップロード予定） Hksn127 (talk) 13:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Just click "Upload a new version of this file" instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
投稿者です。ファイルデータに技術的な問題があるため、履歴含めいったん削除し再アップロードする必要が出てきました。よろしくお願いいたします。（削除後、ただちに再アップロード予定） Hksn127 (talk) 13:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Just click "Upload a new version of this file" instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
投稿者です。ファイルデータに技術的な問題があるため、履歴含めいったん削除し再アップロードする必要が出てきました。よろしくお願いいたします。（削除後、ただちに再アップロード予定） Hksn127 (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Just click "Upload a new version of this file" instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
投稿者です。ファイルデータに技術的な問題があるため、履歴含めいったん削除し再アップロードする必要が出てきました。よろしくお願いいたします。（削除後、ただちに再アップロード予定） Hksn127 (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Just click "Upload a new version of this file" instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
投稿者です。ファイルデータに技術的な問題があるため、履歴含めいったん削除し再アップロードする必要が出てきました。よろしくお願いいたします。（削除後、ただちに再アップロード予定） Hksn127 (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Just click "Upload a new version of this file" instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
投稿者です。ファイルデータに技術的な問題があるため、履歴含めいったん削除し再アップロードする必要が出てきました。よろしくお願いいたします。（削除後、ただちに再アップロード予定） Hksn127 (talk) 13:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Just click "Upload a new version of this file" instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Photo from http://dupnitsa.net/ Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
The copyrighted media at the center of, and taking over half of, the photo is not de minimis, making this file a derivative work. — fourthords | =Λ= | 16:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as above — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Very low resolution - I am the photograph of this picture. I will upload a better one soon Poudou99 (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Presumed derivative work with no sign of permission. Not clearly in-scope? Ubcule (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Item not copyrighted by uploader. Trademarks used in item are owned by the w:World Wrestling Entertainment. Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Too small compared to the original size, which I am in the process of uploading. Dr Silverstein (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: resolved: original size already uploaded. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
copyrighted logo Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I hate wrong own-claims, also this might be below COM:TOO — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Same as https://twitter.com/InchokiTimes/status/1109295975082811393/photo/3 えのきだたもつ (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
The source video was not produced by linepost. It was instead LegCo's own broadcast. Only the legco has the cameras from different angles and is able to do a live stream like this. Roy17 (talk) 22:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Same problem:
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: FOP-related requests have been split to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro (FOP-related). However, to preserve existing references to these requests, all numeric disambiguations have been preserved. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC) edited Brianjd (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
-Dichlorprop_Structural_Formula_V.1a.svg){kind=link}
