Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/05/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_2017.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused & outdated chemical structure. Equivalent to & replaced by File:Structural formula of isopropylamine.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
toti attiti 110.54.238.165 11:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: speedily: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Daikessen.png
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 21:39, 28 Mai 2019 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors; see COM:SELFIE (F10) --Krdbot 01:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
yes Delete by mistake ದೇವಾಂಗ ಲೋಕ (talk) 01:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
speedydelete: Did not mean to upload the file, was testing something and it uploaded. ದೇವಾಂಗ ಲೋಕ (talk) 01:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio as uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. (Commons:Deletion policy#Out of scope) CptViraj (Talk) 03:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:45, 29 Mai 2019 UTC: Fair use is not allowed on Commons --Krdbot 13:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
No found this photo was posted under CC-BY-SA 4.0 Catherine Laurence 12:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
With lower quality/size: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PayPal_Mafia.jpg
I would like to update that image with the bigger one and link it on the spanish article: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/PayPal_Mafia But this whole wikipedia thing is new to me and it's way far from usable for a newbie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uncuriosete (talk • contribs) 12:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ragesoss. 大诺史 (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I may have wrong infrmation RakeshRBag (talk) 10:52, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as above. 大诺史 (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete: nominated the file for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Didn't give all the information about the picture. So, I want upload same picture with all the description Michael Handler Ruby (talk) 11:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
LOSALE PATRICK Patrick losale (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete {{SDG7}}. 大诺史 (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
author request Dvorapa (talk) 22:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete {{SDG7}}. per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
My mistake Красный wanna talk? 21:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete naming error. 大诺史 (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Typo. --Achim (talk) 20:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
The video at youtube is clearly marked CC-BY, but what about the two bollywood tunes Humko hami se & Tum hi ho that are being covered here. I highly doubt that they went through the troubles of getting a release for distributing their cover under a CC-BY license. El Grafo (talk) 08:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- El Grafo, I emailed the artist(s) and the copyright holder of the original content(T-Series and YRF) about this issue, if they don't reply within two days then I will file a speedy deletion. But if they agree to send the OTRS, will it still be deleted ? There is a never ending backlog. It that's the case I will file a speedy deletion now. Regards, Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 08:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Eatcha, I've been told that the backlog looks much longer than it really is because of a few cases that take awfully long to resolve. I can't speak for our admins, but I for myself will certainly not insist on a deletion if there's a ticket pending … --El Grafo (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- @El Grafo: I didn't received a reply, I'm filing a speedy deletion request.-- Eatcha (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Eatcha, I've been told that the backlog looks much longer than it really is because of a few cases that take awfully long to resolve. I can't speak for our admins, but I for myself will certainly not insist on a deletion if there's a ticket pending … --El Grafo (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 12:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teknoraver (talk · contribs)
[edit]I question pd-textlogo for these, which was the (now removed) tag when this discussion was raised - a red fedora is not just a 'simple geometric' shape imo, but a creative element of a trademarked logo.
- https://static.redhat.com/legacy/f/pdf/corp/RH-3573_284204_TM_Gd.pdf says "The only way to obtain permission to use Red Hat’s trademark is by entering into a written license agreement with Red Hat, Inc., signed by both Red Hat and the licensee or by qualifying under or complying with the ‘‘Trademark Permissions’’ set forth in these Guidelines. Absolutely no exceptions." I see nothing in the rest of that document suitable for Commons licensing. "Trademark permissions" does mention non-profit organisations, but only in the context of using the logo to accompany software distribution.
- File:Logo-RedHat-Hat-Color-RGB.svg
- File:Logo-RedHat-B-Color-RGB.svg
- File:Logo-RedHat-D-Color-RGB.svg
- File:Logo-RedHat-C-Color-RGB.svg
- File:Red Hat Logo 2019.svg
Begoon 14:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment There are a few misconceptions here. First, Commons requires copyrighted content be allowed for all end-users, not just non-profits. Second, trademark is not; we allow trademarked content (Commons:Non-copyright restrictions).
- Nonetheless, with this in mind, I agree these are not PD-textlogo and should be deleted unless they are released under a free license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I am, of course, perfectly aware that we allow trademarked content. The quote from RedHat is merely to demonstrate that they specifically do not permit use of the material collectively described by them using the noun trademarks with any suitable license. I mentioned "non-profit" merely because it was there, in case anyone might say "Aha!" and cite it as a loophole. Your reason it does not apply is a better one to mention than mine, since it obviously never could. No misconceptions here - but thanks for your concern. -- Begoon 01:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed that these are problematic copyright-wise. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 13:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). I’m no expert on eastern orthography but is it possible this is PD-textlogo? Green Giant (talk) 07:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation. No licensing information given, taken from https://www.dominicraab2019.com/. Ralbegen (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Image seems to be under a Commons-compatible license on Flickr, but is actually sourced to Instagram ("Picture is taken from her Official public instagram account"). Therefore, a formal permission from the depicted resp. her photographer is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Same problem with this image:
- Keep How do I ask or take permission from her photographer? I don't know her o.O concern is Flickr and Flickr is clearly giving some rights so why Wikipedia is worrying about that? --SidPedian (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
and as you have mentioned the permission is required then why are we having a discussion? you're admin delete it :p I don't care, I checked Flickr policy on English Wikipedia that's why created an account on flicker and started uploading files for articles I created or articles with no pictures. --SidPedian (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- You actually violate even Flickr's rules. As clearly explained in their guidelines, you can upload self-created images to Flickr, but not images you have copied from somewhere else. --Túrelio (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Likely flickr washing: Uploaded today to flickr. --Achim (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment oh I'm sorry, I'll not upload images on Flickr unless they aren't mine. you can delete this images :)) SidPedian (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Unclear about the epimerization (as drawn, suggests that RR is direct product, whereas it's actually SR that converts via A to RR. (RR is the practical product but this diagam seems to want to illustrate more detail than that, so it should have that additional detail be correct). Replaced by File:Menthone Claisen-Schmidt.png DMacks (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree that the image is confusing and open to misinterpretation without the additional information that is present in the replacement file File:Menthone Claisen-Schmidt.png. Ed (Edgar181) 13:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; also opaque & poor quality compared to File:Menthone Claisen-Schmidt.png. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 08:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete just a screenshot of a search on a search engine & was converted to pdf, no reason to keep. 大诺史 (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, possibly promoting a website Alex Cohn (talk) 16:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: G10, pretty obviously just an ad. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Seyram Fiakeye next top actor.jpg
- File:Seyram Fiakeye and Ekow Smith Asante.jpg
- File:Seyram Fiakeye.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
out of scope Strakhov (talk) 15:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegolorenzana55555 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:Diego Lorenzana, heredero millonario.jpg
- File:Jose Lorenzana Gonzalez, ex propietario de la mina de oro situada en Suiza.jpg
- File:Diego Lorenzana Fernández.jpg
Strakhov (talk) 15:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete for obvious reasons. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 16:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Not own work – screencap from a Mazda commercial on Youtube. TFerenczy (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Seems to be an invitation or maybe a pass to a baby fashion show. No possible educational value. Headlock0225 (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GENERAL OVERSEER JAMES ADEJOH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:UPON MOUNT ZION SHALL BE DELIVERANCE.jpg
- File:G.O ADEJOH WITH PASTOR KUNLE LOOKING UPON THE LORD.jpg
- File:G.O ADEJOH PREACHING THE WORLD OF GOD.jpg
- File:G.O MEDITATING ON THE WORD.jpg
- File:G.O ADEJOH WAITING UPON THE LORD.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
it was my upload Guccigoat (talk) 18:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete {{SDG7}} 大诺史 (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
doubtful educational value. no meta data, no description Albinfo (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Insufficient permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have permission in writing from the copyright holder to use the photo in the public domain. Let me know if you think something further is needed to done to document this.--Milowent (talk) 21:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Milowent: Commons doesn't accept forwarded permissions and they can't be for Wikipedia only so copyright holder must send a permission using COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- After 12 years of editing Wikipedia, and being among the top 1000 in articles written, I've seen wide variety in how these things get handled. The release is into the public domain. But I'll handle what you think is required, it would have been nice if you'd notified me before nominating it for deletion.--Milowent (talk) 01:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel, I agree with Milowent. Also, I've forwarded permissions in the past, but I guess I shouldn't tell you for which images. Drmies (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- I understand the ticket indicated below is a submission from the copyright holder to approve release into public domain. See [1].--Milowent (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel, I agree with Milowent. Also, I've forwarded permissions in the past, but I guess I shouldn't tell you for which images. Drmies (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- After 12 years of editing Wikipedia, and being among the top 1000 in articles written, I've seen wide variety in how these things get handled. The release is into the public domain. But I'll handle what you think is required, it would have been nice if you'd notified me before nominating it for deletion.--Milowent (talk) 01:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Milowent: Commons doesn't accept forwarded permissions and they can't be for Wikipedia only so copyright holder must send a permission using COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019052910000857 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 03:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Matt_Farley_May_2019.jpg” under ticket:2019052910000857. --Ganímedes (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Danidamiobi (talk) 20:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Danidamiobi (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. No description. No idea what we are looking at. No educational value. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS. 大诺史 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
inflicts the rules of the page FakerFiloMan (talk) 23:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per COM:PORN, COM:BLP. 大诺史 (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 00:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: incomplete upload, uploaded a year ago. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Getty Images are copyrighted images. Can't be used on Wikipedia Coderzombie (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 11:01, 9 Juni 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
non-free images, see en:File:NamCam.jpg — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:18, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
non-free images, see en:File:NamCam.jpg — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Probably copyright violation just like his all other uploads. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Looks like a postcard from Casa Gouveia, which if well identified would be PD, but in this situation is obviously a copyvio.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also here - http://www.faspebi.com/bijagos.fotos2.html. -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Insufficient permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have permission in writing from the copyright holder to use the photo in the public domain. Let me know if you think something further is needed to done to document this.--Milowent (talk) 21:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Milowent: You need to provide permission via OTRS - follow the instructions on your talk page Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: , thanks! I just navigated the same with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matt Farley May 2019.jpg so I'll try to do the same here.--Milowent (talk) 12:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019061010001102 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 04:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 15:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IshwarGovind (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep File:Bg1211.jpg is COM:INUSE in the article space of en:wp: Biju Govind. Likewise File:P I Rajeev.jpg in P. I. Rajeev. File:BG112.jpg appears to be a somewhat strange derivative of File:Bg1211.jpg where the background has been replaced by a blue colour. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:25, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:NOTSOCIAL ~AntanO4task (talk) 17:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Useful, good quality image, well within scope. AshFriday (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- User's all contributions are copyvios and it could be one. EXIF does not give scanner, camera or software information and it seems copy from internet or social media. --~AntanO4task (talk) 03:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- @~AntanO4task: Which social media source do you believe it's been copied from? Can you provide a link to the original? I ran a reverse image search on the file and received no results. AshFriday (talk) 01:10, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't find proper EXIF, the user is blocked in ta.wiki and all uploads are copyvios. So, I guess it is not own work. Reverse image search will not work in all areas if the image is limited. Eg: FB group. --~AntanO4task (talk) 09:18, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- We have thousands of images lacking EXIF data; that doesn't automatically mean they're copyright violations. The block on ta.wiki is irrelevant to this DR, as the original complaint was listed as Out of Scope. The image is educationally useful and there is no direct evidence of a copyright violation. On that basis alone , it should be kept. AshFriday (talk) 21:36, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per AshFriday. File description is quite specific, "It was drawn by The new star.(HB pencil drawing)", so if the uploader (who uses the name "The new star") even declares the technique used for drawing that picture, own work is plausible enough. Might be usable as en example for a pencil drawing. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
This signature was uploaded by me. The author of this signature requested me to delete it from commons, as this is his bank signature. We have planned to upload his normal autograph. Thanks. Gazal world (talk) 08:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- @P199: Hi, can you also delete this one.? Thanks. --Gazal world (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Gazal world: This one is in use. You first need to replace it, then I can delete it. Regards, --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @P199: Done. --Gazal world (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Gazal world: This one is in use. You first need to replace it, then I can delete it. Regards, --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Likely false "own work" claims. No or insufficient EXIF data (Photoshop, Google). Some of them are professional press or PR photos. It is possible that the uploader is a paid editor with Jegede's permission (or Jegede himself). But even then a free license would need to be verified from every single respective copyright owner (the images clearly originate from different photographers and sources). Delete all per COM:PCP.
- File:Jegede.jpg
- File:Business Career and Entrepreneurship 2.jpg
- File:Ibukun Jegede as a Baby.jpg
- File:At the Junior Chambers International Awards.jpg
- File:Business Career and Entrepreneurship.jpg
- File:Modeling - At a Fashion Shoot in the UK.jpg
- File:Education - At His Doctoral Degree Graduation.jpg
- File:Ibukun Jegede CEO Aniibol Group .png
GermanJoe (talk) 22:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
No found this logo was posted under CC-BY-SA 4.0 Catherine Laurence 12:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:34, 23 Juni 2019 UTC: No permission since 13 June 2019 --Krdbot 00:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: selfie by non-contributor. --Green Giant (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE/Promotional photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful + posters/ads are copyvios too
- File:Shadow Self - Lonely Wolf in Crowded Bollywood (2018).jpg
- File:A Little LOVE STORY (2018).jpg
- File:MONttAGE Academy.jpg
- File:Atanu Biswas.jpg
- File:Monttage Film & TV Academy.jpg
- File:National Award.jpg
- File:FTII Certificate.jpg
- File:Atanu Biswas with ARRI Camera.jpg
- File:Atanu's Award Photo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS, COM:ADVERT & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 02:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashwini Kumar upadhyay (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chennaistar80 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:At daam.jpg
- File:At lake.jpg
- File:Dr qaisar abbas janjua at dawosai.jpg
- File:Dr Qaisar Abbas Janjua at waseem home.jpg
- File:Dr Qaisar abbas janjua at gilgat.jpg
- File:Dr qaisar abbas janjua way to china.jpg
- File:Dr Qaisar Abbas Janjua.jpg
- File:Dr qaisar abbas janjua 2.jpg
- File:Dr qaisar abbas janjua.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roman jackson delhi (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:Maternal health and chid labour.jpg
- File:Health camp and school health camp.JPG
- File:Award fuction.jpg
- File:Mtnl perfect health mela show.JPG
- File:Mega health camp.JPG
- File:Play on family planning in mewat.JPG
- File:Show on save girl child.JPG
- File:Awareness on police help line.jpg
- File:Leprosy awareness by Deep group.JPG
- File:Save girl child n hiv aids awareness.JPG
- File:Disability awareness.JPG
- File:Deep group play on save Animal n birds.jpg
- File:Deep group (Roman,Deep kumar,Anshu).jpg
- File:Deep kumar.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:31, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:RK & BR-Apsara Award.jpg
- File:RK & BR-Amritsar.jpg
- File:BR+RK-2.jpg
- File:RK last pic-1.jpg
- File:Goverdhan Pooja-2.jpg
- File:BR+RK-1.JPG
- File:BR-Election.jpg
- File:Goverdhan Pooja-4.jpg
- File:Goverdhan Pooja-3.jpg
- File:Goverdhan Pooja-1.jpg
- File:Banner-BR.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajay Kumar janu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos, commons is not a photo album
- File:FB IMG56888916.jpg
- File:Big.. 0.jpg
- File:Jaiii12704.jpg
- File:-WA0004.jpg
- File:Ajjj81.147.jpg
- File:IM5..43.jpg
- File:Iasja0006.jpg
- File:Ajay janu0008.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Peonia.jpg Alessiod2007a (talk) 14:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no reason to delete. 大诺史 (talk) 13:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: refers to File:Peonia .jpg, uploaded by requester, wrong page title & desc, low quality. --Achim (talk) 13:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Colliore 1422 (44406186572).jpg
- File:Colliore 1421 (42646605610).jpg
- File:Colliore 1420 (43737827544).jpg
- File:Collioure 1508 (30626303688).jpg
- File:Collioure 1511 (44495927791).jpg
- File:Collioure 1510 (43778285184).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- I've cropped the guy out of 1510 so now it just shows the coastline etc. CallyMc (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- I've also cropped the figure from 1511 and 1508. CallyMc (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept 1510 & 1511. After the crop 1508 just shows rocks and sea which doesn't really have any value. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
All these transfered Flickr images of a Comic-Con event appear to shots of a TV screen and thereby derived works for which we do not appear to have a permission.
- File:Matt Groening (3314254161).jpg
- File:Matt Groening, David X. Cohen, & Eric Kaplan (3314254659).jpg
- File:Bill Morrison, Matt Groening, David X. Cohen & Eric Kaplan (3315080154).jpg
- File:Billy West, John DiMaggio & Maurice LaMarche (3314255793).jpg
- File:Katey Sagal (3314256299).jpg
- File:Billy West (3314257025).jpg
- File:John DiMaggio (3315082568).jpg
- File:Matt Groening, Al Jean & fellow writer (3315084648).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (3315083940).jpg
- File:The Simpsons writers (3314260331).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
AFBorchert (talk) 15:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Murals in the United Kingdom are unfortunately not covered by freedom of panorama, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom#Freedom of panorama. The paintings were created by the Brazilian street artists Nina Pandolfo, Nunca, and the twins Os Gêmeos (see here).
- File:Kelburn Castle (38573161475).jpg
- File:Kelburn Castle (39421029932).jpg
- File:Kelburn Castle (24585598187).jpg
- File:Kelburn Castle (39452140411).jpg
- File:Kelburn Castle (38743941944).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
AFBorchert (talk) 15:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Convergence results for the method and different.pdf
- File:Plate conv.pdf
- File:Figure the countour.png
- File:Fig51.png
- File:Fig55.png
- File:Fig41-2.png
- File:Fig32.jpg
- File:Fig38.png
- File:Fig31.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
only text, out of scope Ezarateesteban 23:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Because this is a my photo, from my website, taken with no permission at all. I never gave my permission to use, nor any kind of usage rights, to none. Your source too used this image without any permission. 87.7.176.43 21:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Disagree : It is a old painting (1285) who is in the public domain...The official position of the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful representations of works of art in the public domain in two dimensions are in the public domain and contrary demands are an attack on the very concept of the public domain". --Adri08 (talk) 06:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Adri08, PD-art. --Thibaut (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
This file is the copyright violation because .... Uploader says "the Government of Japan Standard Terms and Use (Version 2.0) apply to this image". But this file comes from kunaicho.go.jp. This website administrator says "the Government of Japan Standard Terms and Use (Version 2.0) does not apply to images of the Imperial family on kunaicho.go.jp". (note 1, note 2) Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete 宮内庁は「皇室の方々の著作物，ご肖像など」には政府標準利用規約ではなく「別の利用ルールを適用する」と規定しています。具体的には皇室の方々の著作物、ご肖像に関する利用規約をご覧ください。宮内庁の全てのコンテンツに対して政府標準利用規約が適用されるのではありません。
- The Imperial Household Agency says "GJSTU 2.0 does not apply to the production by the Imperial Family and portrait of the Imperial Family. Other terms apply to the production by the Imperial Family and portrait of the Imperial Family." Please see also : Production by The Imperial Family, and Portrait of The Imperial Family. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The terms and conditions of the Imperial Household Agency are not the same as cc-by-2.0. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
情報が誤っていたため 矢ノ沢 (talk) 16:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
It does not seems own work as the user uploads many copyvio images ~AntanO4task (talk) 17:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment This one looks self-drawn and bears the same signature as File:Drawing of Mt.Rushmore.jpg which I just decided to keep. But I'm not sure that this one has potential educational value, as the technique is not declared, and to be usable as a depiction of Yonaguni Monument, I think it looks to amateurish, so it might be out of scope. Pinging AshFriday, as you voiced your opinion on the other deletion request, what do you think? Gestumblindi (talk) 00:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- The medium appears to be black marker on paper. I would vote Keep as an example of a quick sketch in felt-tipped pen. I ran a search and we don't seem to have a category for images of this medium; it might be time to establish one. AshFriday (talk) 06:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- The medium appears to be black marker on paper. I would vote
Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope - PHONE NUM in description of photo Mjrmtg (talk) 00:44, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:52, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 00:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
French logo. per COM:TOO France 119.94.173.1 01:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as above. 大诺史 (talk) 14:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality, wrong description Olgerts V (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal images Plus
All out of scope and used in article that is tagged for deletion Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
It was uploaded for a contest but it was not according to the rules of the contest. Arpuvs (talk) 07:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep But we do not need to delete the image for that reason. The photo is still wellcome on Wikimedia Commons, and may be useful. --Aristeas (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, in use on a promotional user page that i have nominated for deletion on WP Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no longer used. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, personal rights not clear, semi-colored Joschi71 (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
No explanation of purpose. Possibly some sort of notice. Unused image of no obvious use. Malcolma (talk) 09:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality rendering of the YouTube logo, unused. GKFXtalk 10:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- meanwhile i have learnt to use svg so often as possible :-) please delete! Thanks! Yomomo (talk) 08:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hanchao0123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No found these logos was posted under CC-BY-SA 4.0
Catherine Laurence 12:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: 11:30, 23 June 2019, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Balochsaazofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete as above. 大诺史 (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
It is too small Jake2097 (talk) 18:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Certainly non-free image 79.166.178.157 20:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete deriviative work. 大诺史 (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete.Hellas2018 (talk) 09:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed, not a free work. Taken from the internet.--Texniths (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, but the sandbox article credits the photo to Samah Tokmachi. OTRS confirmation would be needed Whpq (talk) 23:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC) I, Joel Robinson, have the right to use this photo because it was a gift from my friend Samah Tokmachi. I am not claiming that this photo was taken by me. You are welcome to contact Samah Tokmachi directly, if you need more proof of my right to use this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mountain Man Joel (talk • contribs) 23:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
No evidence under an open license Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
,_2017.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_2017.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Gusmen Heriadi, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
,_2017.jpg){kind=link}
Dear Patrick, this page is still under construction, which is need to be post one by one, and i`m the manager of www.ruangdalamart.com and personal assistant of Gusmen Heriadi, this page is under his authorization as well. Sorry for misunderstanding and misleading information about the page and pictures. i will re-check all of the pictures that we used for building Gusmen Heriadi`s page based on real references (i.e: official website, webzine, online newspaper, etc)
Sincerely, Gilang Soeprapto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gildanbass (talk • contribs) 10:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
,_2017.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever OTRS ticket is received. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
,_2017.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work, taken from https://house.texas.gov/members/member-page/?district=28. Texas gov isn't PD Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
E' sbagliato l'indirizzo Niko 0217 (talk) 10:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Original author (administrative office of former district Brno-Country) doesn't exist anymore! And this is official document, so by the regulations of the Czech republic it is in public domain!--Kirk (talk) 19:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, text-only doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
File:रानडे इंग्रजी-मराठी शब्ध्कोश खंड पहिला (The Twentieth century English-Marathi Dictionary Volume 1).pdf
[edit]Why USA law is applied to book printed in then British Empire? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: I have corrected the template. The previous US template was a mistake. Please remove the deletion tag. Thanks for pointing out.--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 11:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- What are author's dates of life? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ranade, Nilkantha Babaji: (1872-1918) author [2].Jayantanth (talk) 07:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Please add this information into file description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ranade, Nilkantha Babaji: (1872-1918) author [2].Jayantanth (talk) 07:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: appears to be resolved. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical postcards and illustrations. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:ChasseurFr mars1951 GFRötig.jpg
- File:GFRötig Lionàlaffût v1925.jpg
- File:ChasseurFr mai1949 GFRötig.jpg
- File:HorlogerieRotig LeHavre 51rueParis.png
- File:LeHavre MaisonRötig 51rueParis.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AgustinBossioPainter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
image appears on the subject's website. OTRS confirmation of license is needed. Whpq (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
@Whpq: i have looked online but can't find the process for submitting the 'OTRS confirmation of license' - can you direct me to a page that explains how to do so perhaps? Hashmanza (talk) 08:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever OTRS ticket is received and if draft article about him is deemed notable enough. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sweitzerzombie (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Diagrams of national and provincial road number signs of the Netherlands with broken SVG code
[edit]Redundant to File:NLD-N242.svg, and this version does not have text converted to path (so the font is wrong). The other set is also more complete.
- File:NL-N242.svg
- File:NL N34.svg
- File:NL N46.svg
- File:NL-N196.svg
- File:NL-N197.svg
- File:NL-N198.svg
- File:NL-N199.svg
- File:NL-N201.svg
- File:NL-N202.svg
- File:NL-N203.svg
- File:NL-N204.svg
- File:NL-N205.svg
- File:NL-N206.svg
- File:NL-N207.svg
- File:NL-N208.svg
- File:NL-N209.svg
- File:NL-N210.svg
- File:NL-N211.svg
- File:NL-N212.svg
- File:NL-N213.svg
- File:NL-N214.svg
- File:NL-N215.svg
- File:NL-N216.svg
- File:NL-N217.svg
- File:NL-N218.svg
- File:NL-N219.svg
- File:NL-N220.svg
- File:NL-N221.svg
- File:NL-N222.svg
- File:NL-N223.svg
- File:NL-N224.svg
- File:NL-N225.svg
- File:NL-N226.svg
- File:NL-N227.svg
- File:NL-N228.svg
- File:NL-N229.svg
- File:NL-N23.svg
- File:NL-N230.svg
- File:NL-N231.svg
- File:NL-N232.svg
- File:NL-N233.svg
- File:NL-N234.svg
- File:NL-N235.svg
- File:NL-N236.svg
- File:NL-N237.svg
- File:NL-N238.svg
- File:NL-N239.svg
- File:NL-N240.svg
- File:NL-N241.svg
- File:NL-N243.svg
- File:NL-N244.svg
- File:NL-N245.svg
- File:NL-N246.svg
- File:NL-N247.svg
- File:NL-N248.svg
- File:NL-N249.svg
- File:NL-N250.svg
- File:NL-N251.svg
- File:NL-N252.svg
- File:NL-N253.svg
- File:NL-N254.svg
- File:NL-N255.svg
- File:NL-N256.svg
- File:NL-N257.svg
- File:NL-N258.svg
- File:NL-N259.svg
- File:NL-N260.svg
- File:NL-N261.svg
- File:NL-N262.svg
- File:NL-N263.svg
- File:NL-N264.svg
- File:NL-N265.svg
- File:NL-N266.svg
- File:NL-N267.svg
- File:NL-N268.svg
- File:NL-N269.svg
- File:NL-N270.svg
- File:NL-N271.svg
- File:NL-N272.svg
- File:NL-N273.svg
- File:NL-N274.svg
- File:NL-N275.svg
- File:NL-N276.svg
- File:NL-N277.svg
- File:NL-N278.svg
- File:NL-N279.svg
- File:NL-N280.svg
- File:NL-N281.svg
- File:NL-N282.svg
- File:NL-N283.svg
- File:NL-N284.svg
- File:NL-N285.svg
- File:NL-N286.svg
- File:NL-N287.svg
- File:NL-N288.svg
- File:NL-N289.svg
- File:NL-N290.svg
- File:NL-N291.svg
- File:NL-N292.svg
- File:NL-N293.svg
- File:NL-N294.svg
- File:NL-N295.svg
- File:NL-N296.svg
- File:NL-N297.svg
- File:NL-N298.svg
- File:NL-N299.svg
- File:NL-N62.svg
- File:NL-N69.svg
Rschen7754 18:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Nanotyrannus -Jane- head model - Cleveland Museum of Natural History - 2014-12-26 (20963537200).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 19:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Nanotyrannus -Jane- head model 02 - Cleveland Museum of Natural History - 2014-12-26 (20963541300).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 19:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
most probably grabbed from the web: https://www.alsat-m.tv/arbereshet-e-bukur-nen-objektivin-e-mario-caliva/ Albinfo (talk) 19:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The stage background shows an unreferenced photo (COM:DW); given the setting it’s likely free, but still needs to be identified. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And not really usable anyway. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
i took this photo; valentina does not like it and will provide a new one. Maximilian (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete {{SDG7}}. 大诺史 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep INUSE and was uploaded some time ago so not a simple G7 delete Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use, has been up for some time, "subject doesn't like it" isn't a deletion reason. --Stifle (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
This image was clearly edited from a different, unspecified photo. It raises doubts over the uploader's claim of own work. The precautionary principle should be employed. ℯxplicit 07:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 07:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promo photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Hey, this picture is from my work and does not contain copyright from anyone. The consent of the representative has been taken on this image after communicating with it so it should not be deleted because it does not violate Wikimedia terms and conditions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali9bk (talk • contribs) 07:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Unconventional and misleading depiction of ozone. The long bond is not a plausible chemical bond; this seems to just be an attempt to satisfy the "two bonds to oxygen" rule. GKFXtalk 10:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- The idea was to create an image that would be visible und pass in a text line. I would have already deleted this image, if i could do it on my own :-). Also go for it... Yomomo (talk) 07:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding! You can have images you upload deleted quickly by adding {{SD|G7}} to the top of their page within 7 days of uploading them, or after that point make a deletion request like this one. There's no need for you to do anything more anout this particular image now though. GKFXtalk 08:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader request. --Green Giant (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
This painting made by Héya Zoltán see on the bottom right. He died in 1979. Regasterios (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work: File:NavayLajos1905.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 15:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Further information in Hungarian: https://makohirado.hu/2015/06/16/megujult-a-makoi-muzeum-torteneti-arckepcsarnoka/ --Regasterios (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Further painting from this painter: File:Justh Gyula-001.jpg. See the source above. --Regasterios (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate file uploaded as part of GLAM cooperation, without metadata Cyfrowabiblioteka (talk) 08:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Difference between the images is non-trivial. Have cross-linked them instead. --James F. (talk) 22:43, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Stifle at 14:29, 16 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Franz Anton von Gerstner on the Vitebsky railway station.JPG --Krdbot 00:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
own work? LeonDardan = or ≠ mario calivà? most probably grabbed from the web: https://www.alsat-m.tv/arbereshet-e-bukur-nen-objektivin-e-mario-caliva/ Albinfo (talk) 19:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MorganKevinJ(talk) 22:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
UK logo, per COM:TOO UK, which is shown circles and text in the logo and it is still copyrighted. However, this logo is in public domain in the US only. 119.94.173.1 23:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MorganKevinJ(talk) 00:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=360577812#File:British_Council_logo.svg){kind=link}
Image by the Soviet Luna-3 lunar flyby, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
^ Formal objection to the proposed deletion request for this particular image which is of both scientific and historic value. Since this is an image of great value, I would expect to see a full, complete and detailed rationale for the deletion of this image and that has not been provided above. Therefore, and until that is done, no deletion request should be considered just on the whim or say-so of any one particular Wikipedia editor.
DigitalTim, Thursday 30 May 2019
- It is of Soviet origin and does not meet anything laid out at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Soviet Union or Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Thus, non-free. Scientific and historic value plays no part in this. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- This was released to the press in 1959, if that matters. Bubba73 (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I may be wrong, as this is complex, but my reading suggests the copyright has expired in the US, but not in Russia:
- in 1959 Soviet copyright lasted 15 years, so copyright would have expired 1974
- but in 1973 Soviet copyright was retroactively extended to 25 years, so copyright expired 1984
- in 1993 Russia retrospectively increased copyright term to 50 years, so copyright restablished to 2009 (though as this is a machine generated photo, "sui generis related rights", rather than by "the author's own intellectual creation" maybe this does not apply)
- In 1994 the US enacted URAA which retrospectively restored w:Berne Convention copyright terms, but importantly not "if the restored copyright would be owned by a government or instrumentality thereof", which clearly includes Soviet space agencies and this photo. Also Berne Convention terms for plain photos are a minimum of 25 years, so even without this exemption, it would still be expired rather than restored.
- in 2004 Russia extended term to 70 years, so copyright expires 2029 in Russia
So it seems to me because of the URAA government exemption, Russia's copyright extension do not apply in the US. But that does not help as commons needs copyright to be clear in both US and originating country. Rwendland (talk) 13:56, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- ... But in Russia photographs taken with automatic cameras do not get not copyright, because such work "is made by technical tool without creative human activity" - see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia#Threshold of originality and Template:PD-RU-exempt-autocam. This photo was taken by an automatic camera, so it seems to me Russian copyright does not apply to it. Nor does US copyright per URAA exemption above. So it is PD. Views? Rwendland (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Rwendland, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luna 3 moon.jpg where the debate has been heaviest. While it is true that Russia has an automatic camera exemption, the question is whether or not humans performed any post-processing work on the Luna material. Then, as now, space images typically have had some kind of manipulation performed on them, whether it be colorizing, processing, stitching multiple images together, etc. It will require proving that there was *not* human involvement to be kept, otherwise it falls afoul of COM:PCP. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. True, this photo looks like it had post-processing, so maybe Russian copyright does apply - we should assume it does. But File:Luna 3 moon.jpg looks un-stitched and doesn't look post-processed. Maybe I will comment there. Rwendland (talk) 09:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Rwendland, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luna 3 moon.jpg where the debate has been heaviest. While it is true that Russia has an automatic camera exemption, the question is whether or not humans performed any post-processing work on the Luna material. Then, as now, space images typically have had some kind of manipulation performed on them, whether it be colorizing, processing, stitching multiple images together, etc. It will require proving that there was *not* human involvement to be kept, otherwise it falls afoul of COM:PCP. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as per previous DR. I don't see the need to start over the very looong discussion of the previous DR. --Yann (talk) 12:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:20, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Христина Иванова (talk · contribs)
[edit]Сомнения авторства и лицензии: фотографии разного времени, оцифровали в наше время, автор, скорее всего неизвестен, дата обнародования фотографий неизвестна. Некоторые файлы - производные работы от неизвестных авторов. Необходимо обращение в OTRS.
- File:Том-влак2.png
- File:В.Колумб.png
- File:Почеламут-влак.png
- File:Шугар.png
- File:Еш.png
- File:Рисунок1а.png
Dogad75 (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, unlikely to be own work, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
doubtful source, most probably screenshot from the movie at https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6vi31x Albinfo (talk) 21:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Although it seems unlikely to be the uploader's own work, it is possible it is in the public domain. I think it is worth giving an opportunity for further input from other Commoners. Green Giant (talk) 16:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Image by the Soviet Lunokhod 2 lunar rover, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
^ I am afraid I have to formally object to the proposed deletion of this image as well. Detailed and precise information about Soviet and subsequent Russian space images and rights thereof are woefully inadequate in the English language media and the precise situation ought be be confirmed first before any of these valuable Soviet era space images are deleted.
DigitalTim, Saturday, 1 June 2019
- It is of Soviet origin and does not meet anything laid out at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Soviet Union or Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Thus, non-free. Scientific and historic value plays no part in this. Unless evidence of free status is provided, we operate under the Precautionary Principle. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Image by the Soviet Luna-3 lunar flyby, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Image invisible hemisphere of the Moon from Luna-3.gif for sister file. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- This was released to the press in 1959, if that matters. Bubba73 (talk) 15:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Image by the Soviet Luna-9 spacecraft, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
^ Formal objection to the proposed deletion request for this particular image which is of both scientific and historic value. Since this is an image of great value, I would expect to see a full, complete and detailed rationale for the deletion of this image and that has not been provided above. Therefore, and until that is done, no deletion request should be considered just on the whim or say-so of any one particular Wikipedia editor.
DigitalTim, Thursday 30 May 2019
- It is of Soviet origin and does not meet anything laid out at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Soviet Union or Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Thus, non-free. Scientific and historic value plays no part in this. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Due to its significance, the photo can almost certainly be used with a fair-use rationale on projects that allow it (like enwiki), but there's nothing to indicate we can keep it here on Commons. It won't be public domain in Russia until at least 2037 (70 years after publication for anonymous works; life + 70 if there's a known author) and not in the US until 2062 (95 years after publication) barring certain circumstances listed at COM:HIRTLE. clpo13(talk) 22:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- That said, en:Luna 9#Surface operations suggests that the photo may have been first published outside the Soviet Union (possibly in the UK: [5]), or at least published worldwide simultanenously, so the situation may be more complicated. clpo13(talk) 22:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
![[5]](http://proftimobrien.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Luna9-DailyExpress.jpg){kind=link}
I have started my copyright investigations in respect of Soviet space images, including from original and relevant Russian language material. In the first instance, it does appear that the former Soviet Union did have a relatively relaxed attitude in respect of, for example, educational use, provided that the original material was of a science or technical nature (i.e. not a work of fiction, art, etc. by someone) and that had already been published and was in the public domain. Since the Soviet space efforts were of great state promotional use, such images were invariably published in the likes of Izvestia/Известия and Pravda/Правда thus making such images public domain works - please see an example here from Tuesday 27 October 1959: http(colon)//tinypic(dot)com/r/in60bk/9
My investigations continue but they have to be done in my spare time evenings and weekends which does, I'm afraid, take some time.
DigitalTim, Friday 7 June 2019
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Image by the Soviet Luna-13 spacecraft, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
^ Formal objection to the proposed deletion request for this particular image which is of both scientific and historic value. Since this is an image of great value, I would expect to see a full, complete and detailed rationale for the deletion of this image and that has not been provided above. Therefore, and until that is done, no deletion request should be considered just on the whim or say-so of any one particular Wikipedia editor.
DigitalTim, Thursday 30 May 2019
- It is of Soviet origin and does not meet anything laid out at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Soviet Union or Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Thus, non-free. Scientific and historic value plays no part in this. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Image by the Soviet Luna-13 spacecraft, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
^ Formal objection to the proposed deletion request for this particular image which is of both scientific and historic value. Since this is an image of great value, I would expect to see a full, complete and detailed rationale for the deletion of this image and that has not been provided above. Therefore, and until that is done, no deletion request should be considered just on the whim or say-so of any one particular Wikipedia editor.
DigitalTim, Thursday 30 May 2019
- It is of Soviet origin and does not meet anything laid out at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Soviet Union or Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Thus, non-free. Scientific and historic value plays no part in this. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I extracted Matt to File:Matt Groening drawing (7600939256) (cropped).jpg, that file needs a license review. This file, which also shows Bender, was uploaded by a sock. See User talk:CallyMc#Two uploads speedily deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Matt Groening. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work. Other file LR'ed. --Majora (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ich möchte diese Datei / dieses Foto wieder löschen, weil ich mit dem Handling generell nicht klar komme. Insofern ist mir auch nicht klar, wie und wo ich die hochgeladenen Fotos korrekt beschreibe und kategorisiere. Danke! Andreas.Web (talk) 08:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Andreas.Web: Das Bild scheint in Ordnung zu sein, angemessen beschrieben und auch in eine Kategorie eingeordnet. Wir könnten es nach COM:CSD#G7 trotzdem löschen (du hättest einen Schnelllöschantrag stellen können, da du das Bild gerade erst hochgeladen hattest), wenn du es wirklich nicht mehr auf Commons haben möchtest, aber da ich kein Problem sehe, möchte ich doch nochmals nachfragen. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused. Would have been G7 at the time if done properly. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Matt Groening
[edit]Matt Groening drew several of his famous characters at Comic-Con. Obviously those characters are not available with a free license. Also a Futurama DVD box. These files were uploaded by a sock. See User talk:CallyMc/Archive 0#Two uploads speedily deleted.
- File:Matt Groening (7600939256).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7600939944).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7600941354).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7600942478).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7600942776).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7600943770).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7601375584).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7601376142).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7601376586).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (7601377136).jpg
- File:Matt Groening with Bender DVD boxset (3757273008).jpg
- File:Stephen Sandoval & Matt Groening (7600938836).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- I extracted some files, these need their own license review: File:Matt Groening drawing (7600939256) (cropped).jpg, File:Matt Groening (7600943770) (cropped).jpg, File:Matt Groening (7601375584) (cropped).jpg, File:Matt Groening (7601376142) (cropped).jpg and File:Matt Groening (7601376586) (cropped).jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:52, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Crops have been license reviewed. --Majora (talk) 03:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
رفعته عن طريق الخطأ Ali9bk (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 00:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
