Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/04/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by الغريزة الفائقة
[edit]
Out of scope dick pics --funplussmart (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by الغريزة الفائقة (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:PENIS. Higher quality files are already available, commons already have a vast coverage on the topic.
- File:Semi erected human penis (front).jpg
- File:Semi erected human penis (right).jpg
- File:Semi-erected human penis.jpg
- File:A erected human penis.jpg
- File:A erected 20 year old human penis.jpg
- File:Pre cum human penis.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:04, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Uploader request about a recently uploaded file. E4024 (talk) 03:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Partial upload: unusable in a project Takeaway (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; F7. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Advertising Painp (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Painp: advertising what? clpo13(talk) 16:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Speedily kept. Fatuous nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
SD| G7 Charlottechaouka (talk) 02:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
No source information. No permission information. No License information. Without these informations is impossible to know if the uploader holds its copyright or not. SirEdimon (talk) 01:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Siem Reap International Airport Logo 2002-2008.png
- File:Cambodia Airports Logo 2002-2006.png
- File:Cambodia Airports first logo.png
- File:Phnom Penh International Airport Logo 2002-2008.png
- File:Cambodia Airports logo 2019-.png
- File:Cambodia Airports logo 2008-2011.png
- File:Cambodia Airports logo 2006-2008.png
- File:Cambodia Airports logo 2011-2019.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danny Sun 17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuchenmuye (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: what is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seidhatami (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
©2019 Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. (here) --Alaa :)..! 12:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:30, 11 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: ©2019 Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. (here) --Krdbot 01:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2017-2019 Event Horizon Telescope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as duplicate of File:Black hole - Messier 87 crop max res.jpg. --MB-one (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2017-2019 Event Horizon Telescope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as duplicate of File:Black hole - Messier 87 crop max res.jpg. --MB-one (talk) 09:39, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 06:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
First: Misleading, because it is only a simulation, not an image, as has now been clarified by the publisher. Second: This was released by Goethe University, Frankfurt, not Event Horizon Telescope, and so the licensing is wrong (potential copyright issue). Compare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnsZj9RvhFU Renerpho (talk) 20:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- If the licensing can be fixed, this media may be fine for Commons. But it should be assured that it can not be mistaken for a real image (it should be clear that this is only a simulation). Whether this simulation is worth having on Commons is a different question. Renerpho (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
ok, you can delete it Legit War Articles (talk) 01:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Private images, out of project scope. Except a few reverted test edits no contributions to any wm project.
Achim (talk) 13:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 18:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Typo in the name Deizenov (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 16:57, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmaleTejas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Fruit Processing Market Research Report- Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Fruit Spreads Market Research Report- Global Forecast till 2023.pdf
- File:Calf Milk Replacers Market Research Report- Forecast till 2023.pdf
- File:Animal Feed Market Research Report - Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Industrial Starches Market Research Report- Forecast to 2022.pdf
- File:Algae Products Market.pdf
- File:Yeast Market Research Report- Forecast till 2023.pdf
- File:Still Wine Market.pdf
- File:Bakery Ingredients Market.pdf
- File:Shiitake Mushroom Market Research Report- Forecast till 2023.pdf
- File:Herbicides Market Research Report- Forecast till 2023.pdf
- File:Dairy By-Products Market Research Report- Forecast till 2023.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmaleTejas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Global Natural Immune Booster Market Research Report - Forecast to 2022.pdf
- File:Fragrance Ingredients Market Research Report – Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Brewing Enzymes Market Research Report – Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Tahini Consumption Market Research Report- Forecast to 2022.pdf
- File:Sweetened Condensed Milk Market Research Report- Forecast till 2023.pdf
- File:Whole Milk Powder Market Research Report- Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Malt Ingredients Market Research Report - Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Global Gluten Free Bakery Market Research Report- Forecast to 2023.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmaleTejas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Medical Foods Market Research Report- Forecast till 2023.pdf
- File:Jellies and Gummies Market Research Report- Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Frozen Processed Meat Market Research Report- Forecast to 2023.pdf
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmaleTejas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Even more dubious uploads.
- File:Agricultural Adjuvants Market In-Depth Qualitative Insights, Global Industry Size, Analysis And Forecast Report -2023.pdf
- File:Sugar-Free Confectionery Market to Reap Excessive Revenues by 2023.pdf
- File:Feed Premix Market Global Analysis, Comprehensive Research Study, Development Status, Business Growth, Competitive Landscape, Future Plans and Trends by Forecast 2023.pdf
- File:Flavored Water Market Global Industry Growth, Share, Regional Trends, Industry Demand, Current and Future Plans by Forecast to 2023.pdf
- File:Rendered Products Market Research Report- Global Forecast till 2023.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmaleTejas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Sesame Seeds Market Research Report-2023.pdf
- File:Macadamia Nuts Market Research Report-2023.pdf
- File:Commercial Seaweeds Market Research Report-2023.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not de minimus undated image SecretName101 (talk) 07:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Omranomais (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal files
- File:Diseño sin título (2).png
- File:Omran Omaiss.png
- File:Omran Omais.png
- File:IMG-20170613-WA0002 (1).jpg
- File:Omransays.jpg
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
error in upload Keren - WMIL (talk) 16:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7). -- Geagea (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 07:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 23:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 07:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 23:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
© 2003-2018 ZOS, Lda. - All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
© 2016-2017 Neftçi Peşəkar Futbol Klubunun rəsmi saytı Bütün Hüquqlar Qorunur Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Kinga Taukert STUDIO NAVIGO, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Christoph Speidel, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)LARS AAGE NILSSON, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
https://www.obaadesojiaderemi.com/?page_id=396 Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of Officers of the Jeannette.jpg. That one is actually being used, this one isn't. Jay D. Easy (talk) 19:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image already exists at File:1915-S $50 Panama-Pacific 50 Dollar Round (obv).jpg ZLEA T\C 19:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy delete. @ZLEA: in future please just tag duplicates with {{Duplicate|(name of older/better file)}} or, for any recent upload of yours, {{SD|G7}}. Such deletions are considered routine enough for individual admins to take care of, unless there are unusual circumstances that call for community discussion.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Neha kumari shah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.
- File:Barahawa Lake Chatth .jpg
- File:Gaur NP Map.jpg
- File:Rautahat District New Map.jpg
- File:Barrack Field.jpg
- File:Gaur Eye Hospital.jpg
- File:Papu Shah.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: pictures copied from Facebook -> copyvio and per COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Attributed to "BILLA/Dusek" with unclear source and permission. Tokfo (talk) 20:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Similar to https://fighttime.ru/news/item/14279-kamil-gadzhiev-fight-nights-global-perezhivaet-ne-luchshie-vremena.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Tato Gomez, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dianaatflourish (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission of Tato Gomez needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Laura Sbarbori, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Autorizzato ad inserirla come autore da Jacopo Ratini. Kikkotm 02:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.32.114.17 (talk) 00:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Once an image has been published before without a free guideline, the copyright holder must send a licence via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- You can delete the photo. Laura Sbarbori uploaded the photo with her name. Kikkotm 15:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Once an image has been published before without a free guideline, the copyright holder must send a licence via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused black and white duplicate of File:Michaeljackson (cropped).jpg for no reason. BevinKacon (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Crédito: Gerardo Viercovich, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
©MathiasBothor 2017, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Paul Werner, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Paul Werner was a good and old artist-friend of me in Amsterdam; so I made many photos for him of his works during the years, like these ones I placed on Commons - so I could use them for adding to his article on the Dutch Wikipedia. I think he deserves it! He died last year. I hope this is allowed to do so, because I made the photos. It is low resolution, so nobody can print it.FotoDutch (talk) 07:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission from the artist (heir). --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Paul Werner, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Paul Werner was a good and old artist-friend of me in Amsterdam; so I made many photos for him of his works during the years, like these ones I placed on Commons - so I could use them for adding to his article on the Dutch Wikipedia. I think he deserves it! He died last year. I hope this is allowed to do so, because I made the photos. It is low resolution, so nobody can print it.FotoDutch (talk) 07:14, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission from the artist (heir). --Wdwd (talk) 13:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dianaatflourish Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be a news photo: http://images2.gazzanet.gazzettaobjects.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/47/2017/08/14-4-700x478.jpg?v=20170831100558 Ytoyoda (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also, the name of the file is telling (German "Bildschirmfoto" means "screenshot"). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Advertising Painp (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Painp: advertising what? clpo13(talk) 16:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- No ad.
Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep photos of gardens are useful. clpo13(talk) 16:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep photos of gardens are useful. clpo13(talk) 16:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep photos of gardens are useful. clpo13(talk) 16:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 05:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Advertising Painp (talk) 16:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Painp: advertising what? clpo13(talk) 16:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no reason for deletion. Good view of the city. No AD. Insider (talk) 06:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. It's a street view in Miass, Russia. It's normal that business signs are visible when you take an image of a street, that's not "advertising". --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the city Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the city Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep file is in use (Wiktionary). --Te750iv (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, in use. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - serves Category:Vehicle tracks in snow which is underpopulated. --E4024 (talk) 16:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the city Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
low-quality file Painp (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: In this case, the image is too heavily blurred to be realistically usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
low-quality file Painp (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- We have many worse than this in use in articles. Keep Insider (talk) 06:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded the wrong version of this graphic. Content is my own work. Thanks! MGuadalupe (WMF) (talk) 15:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
-2019-04-10T15:06:00.000Z-File:W&E_Greenhouse_Curriculum_for_Online_Course.svg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:29, 19 April 2019 UTC: author request --Krdbot 01:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:DW. Kirby's design is copyrighted. Doesn't seem to fall under any COM:FAN exception. ›› Fugitron - 09:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Failing Com:scope --AldNonUcallin?☎ 06:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Wrong file name. Riigikogu Kantselei (talk) 08:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, author clearly visible in exif. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Дополнил старую страницу Таёжный житель (talk) 10:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by JameslWoodward. --Gbawden (talk) 06:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
© Gil Plaquet, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 12:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
OoS = Spam/advertisement --Alaa :)..! 12:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Not an original work by Mehr News Agency; see metadata, "Author: Received". 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
There is no reliable copyright information provided for this image. I doubt it was created by the uploader and it definitely was not drawn by Oscar Wilde himself. I don't think this image is in the public domain due to its age. It doesn't look like a pre-1924 image to me. I can't imagine it was created any earlier than the 1970s. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 15:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, I also doubt this is a pre-1924 image. Delete per COM:PCP Abzeronow (talk) 22:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelt at Falcon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Falcon Northwest TLX gaming laptop in cobalt clouds paintwork.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest Tiki micro-tower PCs in red orange and blue.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest Tiki small form factor PC painted orange.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest Talon desktop PC.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest Tiki with dragon airbrushing.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest Mach V PC custom painted with US flag.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest Mach V desktop PC in Jade paintwork.png
- File:Falcon Northwest Mach V PCs in red blue and orange.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest Mach V desktop PC painted in Audi Brilliant Red.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest custom PCs.jpg
- File:FloydBox Falcon Northwest FragBox PC.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest FragBox PC in arctic white.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest desktop PCs.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest desktops & laptop PCs painted in cobalt blue.jpg
- File:Falcon Northwest's TLX gaming laptop.png
- File:Falcon Northwest Talon.png
- File:Falcon Northwest DRX desktop replacement laptop.png
- File:Falcon Northwest Mach V full tower desktop PC.png
- File:Falcon Northwest FragBox Small Form Factor (SFF) desktop PC.png
- File:Falcon Northwest Tiki micro-tower desktop PC.png
_desktop_PC.png){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I entered the wiki-code for the OTRS pending incorrectly. A declaration of consent has been submitted and is pending.Kelt at Falcon (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for all of these files under ticket:2019040510006488. --Green Giant (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
I believe this file should be deleted. 5.151.89.168 15:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
File not used on any pages. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 5.151.89.168 (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaio.ferraz78 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low quality personal photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
low-quality file Painp (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep we have many worse than this in use in articles. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Rodhullandemu. Insider (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep A bald assertion without detailed reasoning is useless. How "not realistically useful"? Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the street in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- A bit blurry, but we have many worse than this in use in articles. Keep The street in Miass. There are coordinates. Insider (talk) 07:00, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep no reason for deletion. In scope. Insider (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Does not appear to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Why? What the level complexity editing this? --Dim Grits (talk) 00:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright renewed in 1971. See Catalog of Copyright Entries 1971 p.409. Early issues of the magazine are public domain, but the publisher began filing copyright renewals for the 1938 issues and going forward. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Regardless, covers are available to Wikimedia via Fair Use. Thmazing (talk) 21:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. My apologies to the community. CrossPlains (talk) 23:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright renewed in 1971. See Catalog of Copyright Entries 1971 p.409. Early issues of the magazine are public domain, but the publisher began filing copyright renewals for the 1938 issues and going forward The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. My apologies to the community. CrossPlains (talk) 23:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright renewed in 1972. See Catalog of Copyright Entries 1972 p.427. Early issues of the magazine are public domain, but the publisher began filing copyright renewals for the 1938 issues and going forward The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. My apologies to the community. CrossPlains (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)kotiss.com, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright renewed in 1972. See Catalog of Copyright Entries 1974 p.464. Early issues of the magazine are public domain, but the publisher began filing copyright renewals for the 1938 issues and going forward The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 22:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. My apologies to the community. CrossPlains (talk) 23:22, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (:en:Draft:April Grey).
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Not OOS but copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Permissions of Jean-Luc Lamaère and Christian Richard needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:20161211 151238JLL 4181 copie.jpg
- File:20170528 175149JLL 6179TD3 copie.jpg
- File:Readly Express et Timo Nurmos ©JLL-LeTROT.jpg
- File:JLL0091 copie.jpg
- File:Queila Gédé et Roger Baudron ©JLL-LeTROT.jpg
- File:Arrivée Prix d'Amérique 2018 ©JLL-LeTROT.jpg
- File:READYCASH.jpg
- File:20180421 161308JLL 6519 copie.jpg
- File:20160131 162410 JLL5991 copie .jpg
- File:20190127 104619JLL 8530 copie.jpg
- File:20170120 141920JLL 8219 copie.jpg
- File:JLL247.jpg
- File:20160825 102725JLL 0636.jpg
- File:Vincennes et ses tribunes.jpg
- File:Vincennes-hippodrome-paris courses.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel, the claimed copyright owner of the last on your list is Christian Richard. Isn't that the person whose permission is needed for this one? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Justlettersandnumbers: We would need from both then. This is claimed as own work so the fact that there are 2 authors is suspicious Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused. Looks like an OoS personal image. Does anybody know him? (Linked to an item without articles at WD.) E4024 (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use; Wikidata says: Founder and chief executive officer of OND TechSol, India. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1. UPF and OoS. 2. One-time upload without camera EXIF. E4024 (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused, the corresponding Wikidata item has since been deleted. No educational use possible IMO. Hiàn (talk) 00:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Smallish image, no EXIF. Other uploads from this user were copyvios. Note that the user name resembles the name of the subject, so it is possible that the claim that this is "own work" is incorrect. Pages with this name has been repeatedly deleted from WP:EN and WP:FR, so the subject probably does not meet our requirements for notability -- that is, this is an unused personal image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:44, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by L736E as Copyvio (Copyviol) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.musicraiser.com/projects/8010-tenedle-making-t/artists User Sussurround claims to have the rights to it. Converting to allow time for OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Sussurround: Please submit your permission to OTRS as I advised on your talk page Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + promotional intent. Ruthven (msg) 18:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm working for Niels Lan Doky, I need to keep his profile updated with professional take. Claudio.Copenaghen (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion given.
- Claudio.Copenaghen: What you actually need to do is to read Commons:Project scope/Summary and en:Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure to understand what you can and cannot upload to Commons and why your editing at English Wikipedia violate the site's Terms of Use. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi LX and thanks for the answer. I read a lot about my due as a Wikipedia editor, even if this is my first editing here. Actually, I'm not get paid by Niels and I'm doing this just because I like him as an artist and I would like to make Niels profile much clear. That picture simply looks old and with bad lights. Claudio.Copenaghen (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep What doesn't seem to be clear to the nominator is that (1) Commons does not delete an image just because someone doesn't find it lovely and (2) we don't remove portrait images from Wikipedia articles either, for such reasons, without replacing them with better ones and (3) Commons and Wikipedia only accept free images, which limits what we can use, and (4) fibbing about "own work" when uploading is bound to get a non-free image deleted. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If you can license a more up-to-date picture, that would be a welcome addition to Category:Niels_Lan_Doky, though. --whym (talk) 11:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - beautiful alley, rural life... --E4024 (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the pathway in Russia. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (now in use). --whym (talk) 11:51, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kabalebo river cabins in the sun.jpg
- File:Kabalebo river cabins at high water.jpg
- File:Kabalebo river cabins dry.jpg
- File:Kabalebo mainlodge.jpg
- File:Kabalebo resort swimming pool.jpg
- File:A Bruynzeel house at Apoera.jpg
- File:Bridge on the road to Apoera.jpg
- File:The jungle has engulfed an abandoned railroad locomotive at Apoera.JPG
- File:A Guesthouse at Apoera.JPG
- File:A deserted train locomotive at Apoera.jpg
- File:Welcome sign Apoera at the river.jpg
- File:Kabalebo resort.jpg
- File:Apoera roadsigns.jpg
- File:Apoera Greenheart sawmill.jpg
- File:Apoera railway station.jpg
- File:Apoera at the river Corantyne.jpg
- File:Mitchel Wongsodikromo Suriname (1).jpg
- File:Mitchel Wongsodikromo Badminton player.jpg
- File:Mitchel Wongsodikromo Suriname Champion.jpg
- File:Virgil Soeroredjo Suriname Champion.jpg
- File:2012-07-29 Virgil Soeroredjo Suriname in London.jpg
- File:Virgil Soeroredjo Suriname.jpg
- File:Virgil Soeroredjo.jpg
- File:NK 2012.jpg
- File:Actueel 320x175.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely grabbed from http://www.gov.sr/sr/ministerie-van-defensie/het-nationaal-leger/de-militaire-politie-%28mp%29.aspx, as File:Landmacht 500x258.jpg.
Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)
[edit]After today identifying around 25 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different flickr-accounts, blogs, airliners.net etc., example: File:Gumair-Cessna U206G Stationair6 PZ-TBD airborne.jpg = grabbed from http://www.flickr.com/photos/59783485@N04/6386125911), totalizing now +/- 50 uploads deleted as copyvio, it´s difficult to believe that these following files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Additional info: File:SAF-001 Suriname.jpg previously circulating via http://latinairforces.blogspot.de/2007/12/surinam-air-force.html (2007). File:CaricomSLM CommuterIslander.jpg previously circulating (even with blurry res and cropped) via http://www.dbsuriname.com/dbsuriname/index.php/slm-vliegt-weer-naar-binnenland/ (= .jpg, last modified: 16.03.2013). Obs.: Nominated are only those files without exif. There are still 8 files taken with a "Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL" for which I presume (assuming an extra large portion of good faith) "real own work".
- File:CaricomFleet.jpg
- File:CaricomSLM CommuterIslander.jpg
- File:GumAir-Nomads.jpg
- File:Gumair-De HavillandCanada-DHC-6-300 TwinOtter-PZ-TBY TakeOff atSMZO.jpg
- File:Gumair-De Havilland Canada-DHC-6-300TwinOtter PZ-TBY.jpg
- File:Gumair-Cessna U206G Stationair6 PZ-TBD airborne.jpg
- File:Hi-Jet BK-117.jpg
- File:Zandery Johan Adolf Pengel International Airport.jpg
- File:Caricom Airways.jpg
- File:SAF-001 Britten Norman BN-2A Defender.jpg
- File:BlueWingAirlines-CessnasU206G Stationair 6 PZ-TLV en PZ-TSC.jpg
- File:BlueWingAirlines-CessnaU206G Stationair 6 PZ-TSC.jpg
- File:SAF-111 PC-7.JPG
- File:SAF-001 Suriname.jpg
- File:SAF214 CASA C212-400.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook downloads (“FBMD” in EXIF), require OTRS tickets
Ytoyoda (talk) 03:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nardisoero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
This image can be found at Mufi Menk's twitter account: see here. This image also seems to be a cropped version from the cover image of Mufi Menk's new book see here Inter&anthro (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this series of product shots from product release parties. Variable sizes of images, and promotionalism apparently in play.
- File:Burkhardt.jpg
- File:Michael Kiesling.jpg
- File:Wolfgang Warsch.jpg
- File:Schrapers.jpg
- File:2018wieland.jpg
- File:Udo Bartsch.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- "Spiel des Jahres" ist not "a product release party". It is a cultural award, given by a non-profit association. "It is thought that the existence and popularity of the award is one of the major drivers of the quality of games coming out of Germany." The decision is made by a jury of journalists working on an honorary basis. Harald Schrapers is the chair of this jury, Wieland Herold an Udo Bartsch are members of the jury.--*smile* (talk) 20:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019041510008743 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 20:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Only used on the Turkish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in November 2017 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Interesting logo, even if the entity it symbolizes is currently unacceptable for tr.wp -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Notability can come tomorrow. OoS are common people, in bikinis or not. --E4024 (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept 大诺史 (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the building in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, the first file in Category:Streets in Miass. Fill the cat better. --E4024 (talk) 20:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Are you seriously? Maybe you should study the objectives of the project? Keep. No reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 07:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a serious presentation. --E4024 (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the Kindergarten in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Why not useful? --E4024 (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
appears to be from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxKokA-FH6Q Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – The uploader has copied this pic from the net, just like all of their other pics. When one search the above pic on the net, many of its older copies appear, e.g. this is the preview of a 2016 YouTube video, and the above pic is an exact copy of the pic appearing in the preview. But that YouTube video is released under a compatible license with the Commons. And the above pic is either copied from there or from a similar preview of some other YouTube video.
- It is clear that the above file is neither the uploader's own work nor released under the correct license, which in itself should be enough reason to delete it. Now the above pic has appeared in the preview of many videos before it was uploaded here, but if someone can prove that the 2016 video cited by me is the oldest amongst them, then the above file might be eligible for its reupload under a suitable license. BTW, the above pic is just part of an attempt by Saini community of India to change the identity of an ancient Indian Yadava ruler from Shurasena to Shoorsaini – Shoor means brave & Saini is a caste. - NitinMlk (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Children on the picture 88.142.156.26 21:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure, but have doubts that this was image has been legally uploaded to Pixabay:
- The uploading user gave themselves the name Kalkifashion. According to profile he is 27 years old and his real name is Sant Singh.
- This image was the only upload. I do not see any connection to Kalki Fashion brand.
- According to TinEye the file has been used on the Kalki Fashion website.
- They state explicitly in their Terms & conditions: “All materials, including images, […] photographs, […] that are part of this Site (collectively, the "Contents") are intended solely for personal, non-commercial use. You may download or copy the Contents and other downloadable materials displayed on the Site for your personal use only. No right, title or interest in any downloaded materials or software is transferred to you as a result of any such downloading or copying. You may not reproduce (except as noted above), publish, transmit, distribute, display, modify, create derivative works from, sell or participate in any sale of or exploit in any way, in whole or in part, any of the Contents, the Site or any related software. All software used on this Site is the property of Kalki Fashion or its suppliers and protected by Indian and international copyright laws. The Contents and software on this Site may be used only as a shopping resource. Any other use, including the reproduction, modification, distribution, transmission, republication, display, or performance, of the Contents on this Site is strictly prohibited. Unless otherwise noted, all Contents are copyrights, trademarks and/or other intellectual property owned, controlled or licensed by Kalki Fashion ,one of its affiliates or by third parties who have licensed their materials to Kalki Fashion and are protected by Indian and international copyright laws. The compilation (meaning the collection, arrangement, and assembly) of all Contents on this Site is the exclusive property of Kalki Fashion and is also protected by Indian and international copyright laws.”
So, only if we could confirm the Pixabay user Kalkifashion would be an account of the brand we should keep the file. Speravir 00:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, prp. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FlightTime as no permission (No permission since) This image has been uploaded by an employee/friend of Felder multiple times, all needs to be done is to send permissions to OTRS the same way they did to verify Felder - FlightTime (open channel) 17:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Nyttend at 01:09, 25 Mai 2019 UTC: Mass deletion of images from serial copyright infringing uploader --Krdbot 06:48, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Remove, this is a cropped photo, will upload a new one soon Rqiang84 (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Uploader requested deletion within the first week after the uploading. --Strakhov (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, spam (descr.), copyvio Nolispanmo 12:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: IMHO clearly in scope Category:High-heeled shoes, but a COM:OTRS sent by LippZahnschirm is needed. --Strakhov (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
As the author of this image, I request deletion from wikimedia and associated websites including Wikipedia. 89.34.99.103 12:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
{{Speedydelete |deletion request is over one month old}} Nowiki'd this tag.
@Alfabetagambero: , deletion requests don't get deleted because they're too old. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, until the IP address above can confirm that they're the original uploader, also this image was irrevocably released with a free license. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
@Donald Trung: , how can I prove I am the author of the image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.211.123.44 (talk • contribs)
- The problem isn't actually if you can prove if you're Allois or not, the problem is that this is a free and educational image irrevocably released with the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license used on 26 (twenty-six) different Wikimedia websites (including this one), from what I can tell uploader's regret is usually permitted a fortnight (2 (two) weeks) after uploading or sometime later in extreme cases but thus file was uploaded in 2007 which was over a decade ago, so a better reason than "I don't like it" would probably have to suffice. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, I do believe that you're Allois and that you created this original image, I see no serious to doubt 🤷♀️ it, however authors can't simply demand to have their images deleted, last year a user was blocked for irritating several sysops to have his image of a small church in Italy deleted simply because he didn't like it. It is not that I don't want to have your request fulfilled, but usually another reason has to be given. Again, this image is used on 26 (twenty-six) Wikimedia Wiki's so we would lose a very useful image if it were to be deleted. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: CC licenses are irrevocable. --Strakhov (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
low-quality files Painp (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Duplicates Painp (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Duplicate of what? Insider (talk) 07:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, it's duplicate, delete it :) --Serjnazarov1 (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If really a duplicate, please point out the image this image is a duplicate of. --Strakhov (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good photo. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 07:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Insider. --Strakhov (talk) 06:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Good view of the Ilmenskoe Lake in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Insider. --Strakhov (talk) 06:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Good view of the tree trunk of Pinus. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - readily identifiable as Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris; a perfectly good pic. - MPF (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Insider and MPF. --Strakhov (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Good view of the wooden fence and the street in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:39, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Good view of the wooden fence and the street in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Insider. --Strakhov (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the district heating pipeline in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the street in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the street in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Painp (talk) 17:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good view of the street in Miass. There are coordinates. Keep no reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 06:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for opening these DRs. I opened Category:Streets in Miass and you can open Category:Snow in Miass or Category:Winter in Miass or both and have a better time. :) --E4024 (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Insider. --Strakhov (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SirBonverne (talk · contribs)
[edit]If there is a "Munaland", Google thinks it's in Kenya, not near Brasil. Suspect this is a fake country, flag & crest.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete out of COM:SCOPE. Kathisma (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong license, cartoonist died in 1955 (wikidata:Q22965303), not in public domain Docosong (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
bad quality duplicate of File:Stanisław Dobrzycki.jpg Gower (talk) 05:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Lower resolution version of File:Mike Collins (left) and Deke Slayton walking from T-38 aircraft at Patrick AFB.jpg. Kees08 (talk) 06:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
_and_Deke_Slayton_walking_from_T-38_aircraft_at_Patrick_AFB.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 10:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arnhem026d (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files are screenshots. Original files not cited.
- File:Derek Paesch tijdens het Wilhelmus bij de selectie Nederland onder 15 in 2017.png
- File:Derek Paesch bij UVV.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 00:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
See COM:VPC#File:Rainbow-3312841 960 720.png and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/01#Pixabay license renewal for more specific details, but basically Pixabay has recently changed their Terms of service in a way which also changed the licensing of the content it hosts. Since the file was uploaded to Commons after the change, it can't be upload under Pixabay's new licensing. I've been unable to find an archived version of the page to try and determine when the file was uploaded to Pixabay and whether the license at the time was OK per COM:L; so, I don't think this should be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
spam with phone and manufacturer's brand O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"Ojos de gato" dice la descripcion. UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 02:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 03:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 03:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 03:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 03:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work. DW. E4024 (talk) 03:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 03:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 03:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work.Taking a pic of a photo is not an own work. E4024 (talk) 04:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- All three files about this person are so-called own works. Please also delete wrongly-titled Category:Mohamed hassan tarhini. --E4024 (talk) 04:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work.DW. I think there was no Apple in those years. The same machine used in 1987 and 2013? E4024 (talk) 04:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohamed hassan tarhini 1987.jpg E4024 (talk) 04:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work but a historical pic. E4024 (talk) 04:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work but a historical pic. E4024 (talk) 04:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work but a historical pic. Please add source, date, license. E4024 (talk) 04:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
An unknown person in an unknown location with no educational or exemplary use. Blatant advertising of sale of images Richard Avery (talk) 13:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- For what it's worth, it's in Category:Grafton Street, Dublin. But I also have doubts about its educational value.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
technical error 5.173.25.109 13:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: fixed. --4nn1l2 (talk) 02:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
So wikimedia commons must delete all photos of Russian Monuments. That is almost 250,000 files see here
Why when there are approximately 250,000 files of Russian Monuments on Wikimedia Commons do you specifically target 2 of my files?
I worked Russia for 13.5 years as a Contract Manager. I know that much of Russian law is still in its infancy and is unclear after the collapse of the USSR. For freedom of panorama to be enforceable there has to be a definition in Russian law of "Art work". Since no one can define art I very much doubt that there is such a definition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harveyqs (talk • contribs) 07:29, 13 June 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted picture B dash (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- Also nominating File:UberCup.jpg for the same reason
Appears to be a crop of photo at https://twitter.com/badmintontalk/status/1068141238300434433?s=21 Ytoyoda (talk) 03:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The cups have probably a copyright anyway. --Yann (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This file is obviously a low quality scan from a printed source. Therefore I consider the declaration "own work" as very dubious, and the licence deed completely unconvincing. That being said, I regard this file as a copyright violation, unless significant further evidence is provided that the uploader had the rights to the file. Gżdacz (talk) 08:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
This printed source is in my author's book under the title "Mechanika budowli" (Structural mechanics), vol.1, page 182 - edited in Cracow by Cracow University of Technology in 2010 year. It is really a low quality scan. Unfortunately. I understand your objections. This source is really my own. ISBN 978-83-7242-541-6 NazwaNr1 (talk) 09:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Did you transfer the copyright to the publisher? If you did (and the book has (c) Cracow University of Technology or similar notice), then it is still a copyright violation. Gżdacz (talk) 09:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
In this book on the back side of the front page there is a notice as follows: Copyright by Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków 2010. What I have to do in this case to obtain rights for publishing this foto? Is it possible? It is quite new problem for me. NazwaNr1 (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- It means that the copyright to the whole book is owned by Politechnika Krakowska. The simplest solution is perhaps that you redraw the diagram in some graphical program. First of all, it is by far simpler than asking the rector, that he licences this single piece of the book under a creative commons license. Next, the quality will be much better than this scan. Gżdacz (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for explanations. I have already prepared new simple drawing made by my own hands and please delete my unfelicitous file "Simple model.jpg". NazwaNr1 (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- This is most probably {{PD-ineligible}}, so no copyright issue. However it is of low quality, and not used, so out of scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
This file you can delete without any objections. It is useless for me. NazwaNr1 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Appropriate deletion procedure is too difficult for me. Why it is so comlicated? My useless files undoubtedly litter Commons and this is why I dedicate them to deletion. Can you help me? NazwaNr1 (talk) 09:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless NazwaNr1 (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
My request for deleting this file is caused by introduction the new more adequate illustration. NazwaNr1 (talk) 10:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was replaced by another one more adequate and actual NazwaNr1 (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: See above. --Yann (talk) 17:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Metadata claims the image is from 976, which is clearly bogus, since it contains dates from after that, along with modern typography. It appears to be by the anonymous author of the now-dead website encyclopedie-universelle.com. As I pointed out in an edit comment in 2017, the rather prominent article en:Arabic numerals has been using the image for some time with text that misleadingly implies it (like the table above it) was created by Jean-Étienne Montucla in the 1700s. This is a useful image, however, and I'd like to see it changed to a lo-res version with corrected metadata (and an intro on en:Arabic numerals that makes its provenance clear), rather than outright deletion. Dan Harkless (talk) 08:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously, and no replacing with a lowres version. Dan Harkless is very welcome to further correct the filepage, to {{Withdraw}} this dangerous DR (as it can be used by deletionist admins to further their cause), and to keep content discussion regarding the use of this image in en:Arabic numerals at en:Talk:Arabic numerals (incl. about the size this image should displayed at thereon). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. I had read a Google translation of the encyclopedie-universelle.com page that links to this before nominating, and it doesn't at all make it clear who created this image or when, and if it was indeed from the 1800s rather than something the webmaster put together in the modern era. However, my main concern was the misleading use of the image on en:Arabic numerals, and I've now removed it from there, with Tuválkin's concurrence, so if this is a copyvio, I'm content for the former encyclopedie-universelle webmaster to take any further steps on that, if they so desire. I am going to put a question mark after the "circa 1870" date claim, though, as that is not established by the encyclopedie-universelle page, and appears to be just a guess. Disclaimer: I am by no means an SME on this subject. --Dan Harkless (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- It was a guess, and a bad one at that (I’m not a SME either, at all!): On a closer inspection it doesn’t look like what can be seen in late 19th cent. encyclopedias but rather something created with MS Word in the 1990s and printed in cheap inkjet, then faxed or digitized with a handheld black-and-white (not greyscale!) scanner. Thanks for your continued work, Dan Harkless. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-ineligible. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This is not an Original Hmt Kanchan watch. It is an aftermarket watch. 167.219.48.10 14:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
If you claim it is an aftermarket watch, you just prove it rather than just stating it is an aftermarket watch. This watch is purchased by me and still in my watch collection. Thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kokkarani (talk • contribs) 23:32, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:39, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot 80.246.94.4 15:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
incorrect license applied IainG (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded a wrong image and I just realize it. I would like to change to another image. Jasonjs (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
violation des droits d'auteurs de / copyvio from https://www.petitbleu.fr/article/2016/12/31/64244-mathieu-blin-club-est-reconstruit-attentats-grand-pere.html - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 18:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
violation des droits d'auteurs de / copyvio from https://www.lnr.fr/ligue-nationale-rugby/actualites-ligue-nationale-rugby/gedimat-et-le-rugby-portrait-de-mathieu-blin - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 18:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Obvious rephotograph, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Obvious rephotograph, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
appears to be a screenshot Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
appears to be a screenshot Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
necesito agregar una rchivo que contiene esta informacion y otra Sandracoterico (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope anyway. --Yann (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
The icons bar in the screenshot can be copyrightable, not really de minimis unless it is cropped. I am relisting this as I nominated this 2 months ago however there was no discussion. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 22:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious licensing. No permission found on the website of the source. Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Selfie, unlikely to be uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious licensing Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not public domain SecretName101 (talk) 23:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in France, needs permission from the copyright holder B dash (talk) 03:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Théorie de l'accessoire : cet argument ne tient pas. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- STOP YOUR DELETIONS ACTIONS !!!! IF YOU DON'Y LIKE MY IMAGES : DON'T LOOK IT !!! --ComputerHotline (talk) 06:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: the images on the posters are so small, this is clearly DM. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing B dash (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing B dash (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing B dash (talk) 03:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing B dash (talk) 03:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- It is her own drawing, so what ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomon (talk • contribs) 10:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no copyrightable elements visible here, just a partial rough doodle. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
It is a photo in a museum. It is not seems to be an old photo. Uncleared copyright status. Regasterios (talk) 15:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused Islamophobic so-called icon. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
No entiendo esta solicitud ya que se trata de un dibujo propio, que pretende ser artístico, basado en la portada de una revista del norte de África de los años 30. No muestra ningún acto ofensivo o sentimiento negativo hacia la confesión islámica, es una imagen normal de algunas mujeres de esa creencia. No se ha dado ninguna razón por la que se considera el dibujo como islamofóbico, ni encaja en ninguna característica que puedan definir el dibujo como islamófogo.--Manuelfb55 (talk) 05:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I suppose "dibujo propio que pretende ser artístico" means "amateur art" and that is OoS in Commons. If not, "basado en la portada de una revista" is DW. BTW I consider it as Islamophobic, just as when people call a woman "beauty" at the street and she considers it "harassment" (acoso sexual) and she is right. That is how she feels about being called by an unknown guy at the street. Please keep your art works on your Facebook page. This is not a WebHost. (I have not given the blue links to policy pages as I understand the uploader does not speak English.) --E4024 (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
No entiendo nada, alguien se ha vuelto loco o tiene una mente enferma. Estamos en Wikimedia Commons, si se considera este dibujo como islamofóbico, habrá que quitar todas las fotos de mujeres con velo. Y lo del acoso sexual, lo entiendo menos. Alguien está sacando las cosas de quicio. Por cierto, el cargador no habla inglés, pero es razonable y sabe discernir lo que es correcto y lo que no.--Manuelfb55 (talk) 09:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ud "sabe discernir lo que es correcto y lo que no"? Then you know very well that "alguien se ha vuelto loco o tiene una mente enferma" is a personal attack. I am sure the closing admin will not miss that. Shame on you. --E4024 (talk) 15:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment Maybe changing the filename would be OK for E4024? (File:Niqāb.svg?). Describing gratuitously as "Islamophobic" contributions of other users without a clear basis (is this icon "christianophobic"?) may be a personal attack too. Bringing impertinent comparisons of "sexual harassment" is pretty unconvenient too, you know that? We have icons of people (Category:People icons) with different clothings (predominantly in a Western fashion BTW)... and, apparently... we have no problem with that. With regard to the DW... that may be an issue, but I don't know how much the depictions of a women with a white niqab over a green background are copyright protected. Is this very similar to that magazine cover, Manuelfb55? (¿cuán de basado está en esa portada este icono, Manuel?). Y por favor, evita las descalificaciones, como te han dicho los ataques personales no son bienvenidos en el proyecto. Strakhov (talk) 06:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
En primer lugar, siento no poderme expresar en inglés, por otra parte, pido perdón si alguna persona se ha sentido molesta por mis expresiones, y agradezco que alguien entienda que me he podido molestar yo por las acusaciones infundadas de “islamofobia” y sobre todo, por lo del “acoso sexual”. En lo referente a la imagen original, se trata de una fotografía de los años 30 del siglo pasado, que vi en un mercadillo y que me sirvió de inspiración para dibujar las figuras geométricas del “niqab”.--Manuelfb55 (talk) 16:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope as niqab icon. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious own work by a user whose own works never have camera EXIF. E4024 (talk) 04:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Only 15 KB BTW. --E4024 (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per user's dubious upload record. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Inadequate source information; uploader's name does not match digital watermark MPF (talk) 11:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
German stamp from 1938. Need info on who designed it and when they died to keep it. Abzeronow (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Complex logo, and I doubt that the flickr user is the copright holder. Maybe an email to OTRS is in order. Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as no source (No source since), It has a source, but I was unable to find this image at the source, nor to confirm the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Still available at norfolksheriff.com which appears to be the official web site. Thuresson (talk) 22:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per source provided by User:Thuresson. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Non free logo SlowPhoton (talk) 05:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kareyac as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-334085.html?page=2 ©exdat 2000-2017 Achim (talk) 20:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- IMO below TOO: Simple coordinate system. --Achim (talk) 20:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, does not seem that simple to me, COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
