Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/02/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 15th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, most likely derivative work. They uploaded copyvios before. 1989 (talk) 04:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 04:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image does not feature the name of the company, as the entire logo should. Bryantriplex (talk) 01:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raushansinghladdu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image, out of scope

Migebert (talk) 08:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

재업로드를 위해 삭제할려고요! Junchoiofficial (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsensical image - not a valid "logo" for a known company. Uploader is a blocked vandalism-only account. No educational usage - out of COM:SCOPE. GermanJoe (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:47, 15 Februar 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 02:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rnqte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted works by Juan Loyola, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 03:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the own work. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. There is the name of a copyright holder in the metadata, 2. the uploader claims to be the subject and claims "own work" but it is not likely a self-portrait, 3. An uncropped version of the photo is located on this website. Need clarification about authorship and copyright status. A file with an identical name was previously deleted, maybe same issue. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 12:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 11:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted 1926 movie poster.(see lower left) Undelete in 2022. Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bhaskar Paul/India Today Group/Getty Images Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mhhossein at 11:24, 16 Februar 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arnabफ्व्रे.jpg: Bhaskar Paul/India Today Group/Getty Images --Krdbot 14:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavoluzsousa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavoluzsousa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permision is needed. --1989 (talk) 01:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour cette voiture m’appartient et je m'oppose a la diffusion des plaques immatriculation 90.102.163.225 10:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this car belongs to me and I’m opposed to the public display of the license plate.
Avis de l’auteur de l’image : je ne pense pas que cette demande repose sur une quelconque base légale, que ce soit en droit français ou américain. Néanmoins, il est possible de téléverser une nouvelle version de l’image dont les caractères de la plaque d’immatriculation auront été masqués ou changés d’une quelconque manière. Akela NDE (talk) 10:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Opinion of the file author: I don’t think there is any legal basis for that demand, in either French or US legislations. However, it is possible to upload a new version of the image with the license plate characters masked or changed otherwise.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - plate has been masked. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, Je suis propriétaire de cette voiture et je m’oppose à la diffusion de ma plaque immatriculation. Merci de retirer cette photo ou de masquer la plaque. 90.102.163.225 14:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m the owner of this car and I’m opposed to the public display of my license plate. Thank you for removing this picture or for hiding the plate.
 Speedy keep Même remarque que précédemment. Le numéro central de la plaque a été changé par courtoisie, mais cette demande ne repose sur aucune base légale ; par ailleurs, rien ne permet d’affirmer que l’IP 90.102.163.225 (talk contribs WHOIS RBL abusefilter tools guc stalktoy block user block log) est véritablement le propriétaire de cette auto. Akela NDE (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Same comment as previously. The central number on the plate has been changed as a courtesy, but this request has no legal basis and nothing proves IP 90.102.163.225 (talk contribs WHOIS RBL abusefilter tools guc stalktoy block user block log) actually is the owner of that car.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion plate has been masked. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

merci de masquer ou de supprimer cette photo , je suis propriétaire de cette voiture et refuse la diffusion de mes plaques immatriculation 90.102.163.225 10:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for hiding or deleting this picture, I’m the owner of that car and I’m opposed to the public display of my licence plates.
This is a wee bit repetitive, so I put a message on that IP’s talk page, telling them that 1) there is no need to make 3 successive deletion requests in 2 days, and 2) that they have no right to oppose to a public display of a picture of their car, and 3) that the license plate has actually been changed to please them. Akela NDE (talk) 11:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cette image m’appartiens et je refuse ça diffusion 90.102.163.225 16:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image belongs to me and I refuse it’s publication
Which is a plain lie since I took the picture myself back in 2012. This is starting to be annoying. Akela NDE (talk) 09:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - image taken in a public place. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File can be deleted! Equivalent to & replaced by File:Strukturformel von 3-Hydroxybutanal (Aldol).svg. It´s also not in use anymore! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chem Sim 2001: Jeff G. makes a good point about Commons:Canvassing. DMacks (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: Thanks for your comment. Yes, you are right! There are a lot of bad chemical structures out there. But the point is that this structural formula looks quite good at first glance, but I have redrawn it to fit the rules & regulation of drawing chemical structures on the german wikipedia. The old one was drawn with ChemDoodle and false dimensions, the new one (replacement) was drawn with ChemDraw with the exact dimensions! Greetings, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Chem Sim 2001: Why can't we have both an ACS version and a German Wikipedia version, for different audiences and their different rules & regulations?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: To use my "old" version of this chemical structural formula as an alternative for some cases may be useful indeed! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I withdraw this deletion request. There seems to be no agreement & the reasons of Jeff G. are good! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. Ed (Edgar181) 18:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical structure with several SVG errors and not drawn according to MoS. I have superseded it with File:3-Hydroxybutanal-2D-structure.svg as corrected version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei sollte nur ein Anhang zu einem Wiederherstellungsantrag sein. Sie ist nicht für die öffentliche Verwendung vorgesehen und leider irrtümlich im Wikimedia Commons gespeichert worden. Chancy Squire (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --Green Giant (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam/advertisement --Alaa :)..! 03:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo = OoS --Alaa :)..! 03:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo = OoS --Alaa :)..! 03:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, not useful content --Alaa :)..! 03:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, not useful content --Alaa :)..! 03:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, not useful content --Alaa :)..! 03:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, likely out-of-scope. This is also a screenshot of Windows Explorer and it's icons, which are non-free. Sunmist (talk) 08:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - low quality image of no educational value. O Still Small Voice of Clam 09:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - low quality image of no educational value. O Still Small Voice of Clam 09:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, very bad quality Hinnerk11 (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's unused signature is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 12:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 12:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 12:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lady andrea67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R.P.Patel(Rajat Patel) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ralph Castillo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahul jamwal Singer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jisan.ctg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahul music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jay Panchal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TroubledOne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Much too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It may seem to be of low quality but let me publicize why I am doing somethings that I am doing recently or why. I should be contributing relevant facts that should surely benefit current and future generations but I am not sure what to contribute thus, I am just familiarizing myself with the project with hope that whenever there is any relevant information I can provide, it should be relatively easy and to me, I have survived suicide attempts since 2008 because sometimes there is some info on the web or some photos or videos on the web that interests me and motivate me to try revert my suicide attempts, more so, outside the web, in absence of Electricity or full battery, I am aware some forces ensure I stumbled upon photos or videos that inspire me to desire life and so I try to revert my suicide attempts but the solution weather online or offline always ensured that I actually survive all suicide attempts and that is because the proffered solutions be it on books, magazines or online, are always dependable facts thus if I must contribute, I must contribute facts but I don't know what to do yet than do my thing and even in doing my thing, I am sure I should try to be factual. I am not yet sure about the relevance of what I am doing yet but hopefully soon it will be relevant. The Sammie Kporaro in the photos Is ancestrally black in appearance though applies skin lightening cosmetics sometimes yet as someone from a Nigerian middle-class family, this one sometimes try to save money by purchasing cheaper cosmetics produced somewhere within Africa (the name of the place will never be mentioned for I am not sure we can be certain that someone is not trying to tarnish the reputation of the manufacturer or the source country) which recently almost damage it's appearance beyond recognition but thanks again to the people of the white human race and thanks to factual information provided, the Sammie Kporaro appearance is now better though darker and we can be certain that the damages was beneficial considering that without racism but with admiration and respect for the people of the white human race through whom a lot of beneficial inventions, formulations and preparations are available, Sammie loves children, preferred to remain childish and can even sacrifice everything just to be able to really be reproducing children throughout eternity such that even if it dies, through it's children it will really survive death such that at death, rather than be declared to have left to be mourned by whatever, it surely will be one that survives through it's own children thus be declared as survived by the children: the implications of this is that Sammie will be numerous commoners in all actual living human generations and the demerits of this is that even when resources that will enrich and satisfy up to ten people are realized, yet no individual child of Sammie will be satisfied or enriched and the undesirable effect of this is that no individual child can fully utilize it's individual intellectual capabilities and so, regardless of even if the human clan actually proceeding out from through Sammie ever generate collective wealth and Fame or notoriety, individual members remain miserably wretched which is not a desirable thus, it could be that Sammie was born black (we respect the white Humans because almost all that enable life to be more comfortable, easy and desirable are mostly the discoveries and inventions of Humans of the white human race and they not only reserved it to them selves which if maybe it were people from a different human race that discovered or invented such desirables, they may reserve it exclusively to themselves alone with pride so everyone should comprehend our admiration and respect for the humans of the white human race) so I emphasize that Sammie must have been initially born black because of what it is, what it might be and what it would become. There could be advantage in a disadvantage for even the word disadvantage could not be what it is without adding advantage as the surfix thus don't delete this photos so that the black skin one will remain black and not be confused as a White human. (TroubledOne (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted. --Yann (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TroubledOne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TroubledOne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality and presence of watermark suggest these are not the uploader's own works as claimed. Images are not used in any articles.

Ixfd64 (talk) 20:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope obvious spam selfie image. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. Acabashi (talk) 20:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope obviously a spam selfie image. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. Acabashi (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Mariah Miranda, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Gerardo Gomez/Fundamusical, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This category is a bit over-populated and needs to be pruned. I've been taking photos of the Bailey from the same angle for 3 years, and haven't been selective enough about which ones I upload -- plenty of these photos add nothing educationally distinct to Commons' collection. The photos I've selected for deletion either have a significant technical flaw (mostly overexposure or underexposure) or have twin photo(s) that are essentially identical (e.g. taken moments apart). I am the uploader and photographer for all of these photos (and almost all of the photos in the category).

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://twitter.com/devinsarno?lang=fr Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my own recent upload, superceded by File:Eve DCF Genius of Creation 1915.jpg Lockley (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook (see EXIF), no permission. Sealle (talk) 04:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"The Rocketeer" is a copyrighted character created by Dave Stevens. Commons is not a fanart hosting service. AshFriday (talk) 06:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"We can't accept work created or inspired by others. By default, you can't upload someone else's work. This includes...drawings of characters from comics, TV or movies, even if you drew them yourself." 

AshFriday (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. See COM:TOYS:

In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
AshFriday (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. See COM:TOYS:

In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
AshFriday (talk) 06:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from this stock photo which is used on his ads, such as here and here. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pbroks13 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.thewineladies.com/tag/peter-gago/ — Racconish💬 07:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

worse copy of File:Bandera col santander.jpg. Please protect the filename. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:12, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photograph overwritten by Mexican flag emoji TFerenczy (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified and unused flag, probably out of project scope. If you delete the file, then protect the filename against upload as too generic. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

originally tagged as "derivative work" with no source, but no indication of what it is derived from, which is confusing, at least to me. The "own work" claim may be questionable, unless we just trust the user name of the uploader as evidence of ownership. Begoon 11:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete as tagger. This appears to be a 1,076 × 1,208 (592 KB) digitally manipulated version of a digital photo or scan of a folded paper print of a timeless photo. If E.goncharenko~commonswiki were the original photographer, they should have been able to produce a much better and higher resolution digital photo or scan.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree. I raised this request purely because the file was tagged as a "derivative work" with no indication of what it might be derived from, which was somewhat confusing. Without a clearer source/evidence of ownership my opinion is  Delete too. On a tangent, it's quite annoying that the scripts alert PawełMM, who is not the original uploader, merely a graphist who helpfully made some improvements. Taggers should probably watch out for that, or, even better, the scripts should be fixed. -- Begoon 13:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Begoon: The scripts alert all uploaders as a courtesy. They are defined as "related users" at Help:QuickDelete.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:02, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is well established that models have copyrights. This image is a derivative work and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the copyright holder. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bell V-280 HeliExpo 2016.jpg. All discussion should take place there .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagevio of logo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zjugurtha

[edit]

All contributions consist of one flopped image possibly scanned from a 20th-century diapositive, one file deleted as no-permission, and two Facebook (FBMD) images. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, cropped from something like these. We'd need confirmation via OTRS. Huon (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.parlam.kz/en/mazhilis/international-meetings Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Saylau Maylybayev/IC HOZU PARLAMENTA RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Saylau Maylybayev/IC HOZU PARLAMENTA RK, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. Better quality image see here. --Павло Гетманцев (talk) 13:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. Better quality image see here. --Павло Гетманцев (talk) 13:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Arkesteijn’s syndrome? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I found the Twitter original [1] too dim. --Павло Гетманцев (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've delete file --Butko (talk) 05:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Butko. --1989 (talk) 01:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotografas, Tomas Lukys, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Italia6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Currency. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DJ BANA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising content, Not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Unlikely Own work.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from toy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from toys. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bostoncommercial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication it is Creative Commons GreenC (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not Creative Commons GreenC (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this was released under Creative Commons GreenC (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Làng muōi sĭng (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Làng muōi sĭng (talk) 15:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Làng muōi sĭng (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Làng muōi sĭng (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Làng muōi sĭng (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality image. Practically painful to look at. We have many others of both the State of Liberty at New York New York and Excalibur so I think we can spare this one. Missvain (talk) 16:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Celeb slipper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality penis picture, nothing new or extraordinary. COM:PENIS

Ies (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cskane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These model photos, uploaded by Cskane (Caroline Shay Kane) herself are not own works rather probably copyrighted professional photography art, COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol: the Cavallino isn't an "own" or free logo; and also Its design, probably does meet the threshold of originality = copyright protection. Danyele (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol: the Cavallino isn't an "own" or free logo; and also Its design, probably does meet the threshold of originality = copyright protection. Danyele (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Niko Pridonovich Herkeladze, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bappa hosssn Bappa Hossan (talk) 06:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requests deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

speedy F10+G10 failed as in use, meanwhile d:Q61707372 was deleted, cf. d:Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2019/02/14#Q61707372_2. –84.46.52.174 10:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, this is a selfie 🤳🏻 in use as a user page image (see "COM:INUSE"), from what I can tell this user is an active Wikidatan and his autobigraphical/self-promotional content, while present, is kept within reasonable bounds. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The F10 clause on COM:SPEEDY is rather obscure, but an active Wikidatan spamming the Project chat with their own vanity item cum picture infuriated me; should I follow suit based on "have ORCID ID and published (one (lousy (NN (irrelevant)))) RFC", complete with a lousy JPEG here? –84.46.53.251 05:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't only me, somebody else was also annoyed (there were two deletetion requests on d:), and as of today d:Wikidata:Project_chat#Empty_entries? is not yet archived. –84.46.53.251 13:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Fails neither F10 nor G10. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion, file is INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madhulan S S (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Both INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SmillieKylie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this work has been published one day or more than 50 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G., @E4024, @Gbawden, The photo falls in the category in the public domain as the person retired from the air force in 1968. The photo was taken before 1969. Shamsun N Tushar (talk) 03:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had downloaded this photo from twitter.com without any permission from the author, this photo must be deleted. Shamsun N Tushar (talk) 14:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shot in 1971 (https://cellcode.us/quotes/pakistan-war-1971-bangladesh.html), no author, no permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete thank you Exposedindiapers (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete thank you Exposedindiapers (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's pornography 209.68.120.114 20:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)2019 Raph Nogal, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i am the owner of the photograph and i did not upload it here. can be reached at ebru@ebruyildiz.net 2604:2000:8052:2500:4C2A:CE94:418E:112A 22:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, this photo is the property of Partisan/Knitting Factory Records (Shilpa Ray Etc is/was one of their artists) and in 2011 they gave full permission to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons. It was part of an editing for donations project -- Partisan/Knitting Factory (an indie record label in Brooklyn NY) took me up on my offer and sent a generous check to Wikimedia Commons; in exchange, I wrote about their artists, including Shilpa Ray (who is no longer represented by them I believe in 2019). Partisan e-mailed me this image to upload to Wikimedia. For further information, check with Partisan Records and the Knitting Factory Records website. --Tomwsulcer (talk) 03:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; nom is not the owner and we have OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Juan Almagro López).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Patrick Rogel, le agradezco la información que me ha enviado sobre el aviso de borrado. Soy historiador del arte jubilado y en la actualidad, estoy elaborando el siguiente proyecto: Juan Almagro López, pintor (https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario:ILDE.ZAFRA.P/Taller&action=submit) y para poderlo realizar necesito los archivos de fotografías y de infografías que aparecen en dicho trabajo (como soy nuevo he subido más de los que en realidad necesito). Por otra parte, he de comunicarle que las fotos son originales hechas con un iphone 7, (los archivos no están fotografiados ni escaneados de libros) y soy el autor con los permisos de las personas e instituciones dueñas de las pinturas y dibujos. Igualmente, las infografías están hechas por mí. Por tal motivo, solicito la restauración de los mismos. Le pido disculpas y agradezco su comprensión. Saludos cordiales. --ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ILDE.ZAFRA.P: Please re-read the section "Commons tiene un propósito específico" on your talk page. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ILDE.ZAFRA.P: Besides Juan Almagro López's work is copyrighted until 2036. Have you provided a permission of the painters's heirs before uploading here? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, Patrick Rogel, me pongo de nuevo en contacto con usted para comunicarle que tengo autorización de los herederos y dueños de los cuadros que corresponden a las imágenes del proyecto, sobre Juan Almagro López, alojado en https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario:ILDE.ZAFRA.P/Taller&action=submit Saludos cordiales. --ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have you sent a permission via COM:OTRS? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Juan Almagro López), already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Juan Almagro López), already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment This could be in scope. The quality is sufficient, so that they can used to illustrate this style of painting. But of course, we need an OTRS permission from the artist's heirs. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Patrick, con fecha dom., 17 mar. 21:26 (hace 23 horas) se ha enviado un correo electrónico a: permissions-es@wikimedia.org [Ticket#2019031710005771] Confirmación de recepción (Re: Cediendo derechos de [...]) Cediendo derechos de autor a usuario ILDE.ZAFRA.P para Wikimedia

Inés Solas Almagro <inessolas@gmail.com> dom., 17 mar. 21:26 (hace 23 horas) para permissions-es

Por la presente declaramos que somos las titulares de los derechos de autor exclusivos de las OBRAS DE ARTE DEL PINTOR JUAN ALMAGRO LÓPEZ que se encuentran alojadas en [2] [3] [4]. Estos derechos los hemos cedidos a Ildefonso Zafra Peña (usuario ILDE.ZAFRA.P) para la publicación del artículo Juan Almagro López en Wikipedia.

Consentimos publicar dichas obras bajo la licencia libre Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (BY-SA-4.0).

Reconocemos que concedemos a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades.

Somos conscientes de que siempre retendremos los derechos de autor de nuestro abuelo Juan Almagro López, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para su obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no le serán atribuidas.

Somos conscientes de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y nos reservamos el derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas.

Reconocemos que no podemos retractarnos de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia.

Inés Mª Solas Almagro (nieta de Juan Almagro López)

Dolores Mª Solas Almagro (nieta de Juan Almagro López)

17 de marzo de 2019


Muchas gracias. Saludos --ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination+lacks of permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+lacks of permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Virendra Saklani/Gulf News, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Shivangi Kulakarni, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: LINDA ROBERTSON, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) V. Tony Hauser, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Benoit Linero, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of plain-text chemical equation; could easily be redone in TeX DMacks (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of plain-text chemical equation; could easily be redone in wikimarkup DMacks (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (violation de droits d'auteur) from https://www.instagram.com/p/BnJ-d6mg7mi/ - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 23:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused small, not-quite-aligned lines and improper geometry. Have File:Acenaphthoquinone.png as replacement DMacks (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small/low-res; Category:Vinylene carbonate has several alternatives DMacks (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete taken from this source, with no indication it is the property of the uploader nor with a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Oriol Pages, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Roman Maksymiw, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated, not-large, and with frame and large margin; have several Category:Diethyl oxalate alts DMacks (talk) 23:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antilong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A comprehensive photo collection of the political life (hand shakes etc.) of ru:Нигматулин, Нурлан Зайруллаевич, a Kazakh Statesman, Chairman of the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan, uploaded by Antilong in 2012 & 2013. After identifying some multiple personalities issues (see User talk:Antilong, exif´s with different photographers = "Saylau Maylybayev" and "Ismalov Kuanysh", these files are already tagged with no-permission and are not part of this DR), it is highly unlikely that Antilong ever pulled the trigger to take all these pictures, considering

  1. an arsenal of different digicams (NIKON D3X, Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Canon EOS 1100D, NIKON D90, Noritsu QSS-32_33)
  2. a high number of files with small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF
and
3. some mysterious temporal context and other stuff, which indicates that here are several photographers involved, e.g.:

© 2013 — Central Communications Service for the President of Kazakhstan) = http://ortcom.kz/media/upload/112/2013/06/10/1e066de803006ea0b4fbd04590c4ef76.JPG (last modified: 10.06.2013, 12:13, high res version with exif)

It seems that - by some means - Antilong has access to the parliamentary photo/press service but this does not give him the right to publish these images (as indicated above taken by several photographers/organizations) as "own work". So, unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence (by whomever: inform.kz/parlam.kz/ortcom.kz/etc.) indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons.

Gunnex (talk) 16:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antilong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Antilong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I suspect there is deception going on with this user regarding authorship. The file they uploaded here contains their username in the metadata as the author, Patrick Rogel nominated it for speedy containing this link. I downloaded the images from the source and Commons to compare the metadata, In the original source, it does not mention their username whatsoever in the metadata.

If this DR is to pass, I highly recommend blocking this user indefinitely for license laundering and deception.

1989 (talk) 18:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hristijan Kicho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I seriously doubt any of these uploads are the uploaders own work.

1989 (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hristijan Kicho (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res web size, crop marks, and almost all have FB or transmission code in EXIF data. Unreliable uploader, see previous DR's.

P 1 9 9   14:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Is 960 × 720 px "low-res web size"? In previous DRs the reasons were "serious doubt" and "could be found" (but were not?) elsewhere, +"inconsistent resolutions" (natural if the user crops them). Too little said in those DRs to draw any conclusions about the contributor or about these files. Looking at those previous files could say something, but as they are deleted, I cannot see use any such information. –LPfi (talk) 16:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, for pictures supposedly taken in 2020, 960x720 with a filesize of about 150 KB is certainly low-res! Most telling is the FB code in the EXIF data. If previously published on FB, it will need OTRS at a minimum. --P 1 9 9   17:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If published on FB (or anywhere). Images uploaded to FB but not published (such as those viewing of which was restricted to family members) do not need OTRS. And not all nominated files have an FB code. Is also a night view of 1 620 × 1 080 (1.3 M) "low-res web size"? I'd like to have all files nominated fulfil the stated reason for nominating them, and I do not like referring to a previous DR where nothing much was said. –LPfi (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unlikely to be own work, despite the size. Those without FBMD probably came from Insta or similar. PCP especially based on the uploader history. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (violation de droits d'auteurs) from https://www.lepoint.fr/sport/xv-de-france-interdit-de-jouer-en-france-tolofua-dans-l-expectative-09-02-2018-2193757_26.php ; this article quotes AFP/Archives / BERTRAND GUAY as the author, no permission or free licence is provided to re-use the picture here. - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 23:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- ~ Nahid Talk 23:22, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"Andrew H. Walker", needs to go through undeletion process

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 02:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work in 1957? E4024 (talk) 19:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader has problems with copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If Vazken Andréassian dies in 1995, according to the info on his cat, a 2013 pic cannot be an "own work". Probably grabbed from the net or photo of a photo. E4024 (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1957 pic uploaded as "own work". I recommend to check all uploads of this user. E4024 (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1957 pic uploaded as "own work". Dubious. E4024 (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fiorenzagibrani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Pier Augusto Breccia (d. 2017), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick, the heirs of Pier Augusto Breccia have emailed wikimedia today (at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) to release all the files I uploaded on Wikimedia commons under a free license (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International). I hope this will be enough to stop deletion of those files. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiorenzagibrani (talk • contribs) 00:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr account only has one upload (this image). Most likely Flickrwashing. 1989 (talk) 04:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP, most likely flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Serj Sarqsyan, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel this is NOT SERJ SARGSYAN , this is Serj Sargsyan. Please remove the deletion label immediately. --Narek75 (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Narek75: Who is Serj Sarqsyan? And why are you stating you are this person since you are named Narek Avetisyan? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm honestly not sure I understand what you're talking about, Patrick Rogel. Which person ? Serj Sargsyan is the former president of Armenia. What is your argument ? I honestly am having a hard time understanding you. --Narek75 (talk) 08:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry, just saw the Serj Sargsyan copyright holder part. Mr. Sargsyan (not the ex-president) is the photographer working for us, he has no claim to the photos, since the photos are ours to release to public domain. --Narek75 (talk) 08:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And who is this "us" please? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is us (icare.am), we are a research institution. --Narek75 (talk) 06:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Narek75: you will need to send permission to OTRS as your website clearly states (C) Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; permission to be sent to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Russia for 2-D artworks. Copyrighted work by Pier Augusto Breccia (d. 2017), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Italy. Copyrighted work by Pier Augusto Breccia (d. 2017), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. PD? E4024 (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; doubtful claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF but with transmission code; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and it's available here on Twitter. --Ahmadtalk 10:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i am the owner of the photograph and i did not upload this photograph. I can be reached at ebru@ebruyildiz.net 2604:2000:8052:2500:4C2A:CE94:418E:112A 22:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; clear copyvio, not own work - author visible in exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is one of my photographs and I own the copyright and I did not upload it here. If any questions please contact me ebru@ebruyildiz.net 2604:2000:8052:2500:4C2A:CE94:418E:112A 22:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not own work as claimed, the author is clearly stated in the exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, permission of artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, permission of artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fdojove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and radio broadcast. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fdojove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And others uploaded files:

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, false own work claim.

And also

The uploader is in the photo. He could not take pictures of himself.

Микола Василечко (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cindydag (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely derivative work

1989 (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 12:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John julie white (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely derivative work

1989 (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://ok.ru/azerbaycanaz/topic/67391212950864 Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the uploader is planning to email OSTR to provide evidence that they are indeed the copyright holder. Pbroks13 (talk) 22:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Pbroks13, I'm the composer himself. This is the original file, you can find dozens of these photos on the internet, but not this quality. I applied for Mirza Babayev, but i don't see why this original file can't stay here.--Mansurov Eldar (talk) 06:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mansurov Eldar is confirmed as the copyright holder for this image, and I believe that it is extremely likely that he is the copyright holder of this one as well. If necessary, Mansurov Eldar can email OSTR to prove that he is also the copyright holder of this image. Pbroks13 (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is not in the public domain. This photo is a form of harassment Crispybcritters (talk) 00:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, the image was not placed in the public domain. Rather it was released under a creative commons license. Crispybcritters, are you familiar with how the {{Flickrreview}} robot confirms images are properly licensed?

    As to images that are forms of harrassment... Well, I don't think there would be much sympathy for retaining images that everyone agreed were unambiguously regarded as harrassment. But how is this image harrassing? It looks like a pretty ordinary image, to me.

    Sometimes we agree to remove properly licensed images, as a courtesy. When the image is in use that is a harder. This image IS in use.

    Crispybcritters, if you know Ms Barber, or you know someone who knows her, so you are very confident that she regards it as harrassment, then would you please ask her to confidentially establish her identity through the OTRS committee? One thing that really bugs me is when someone says. "I am Joe Bloe, and I demand the article on Joe Bloe, or the image of Joe Bloe, be deleted!" When material is properly licensed, and otherwise policy compliant, deletion is a courtesy. If Joe Blow, or Ms Barber, want material related to them deleted the first thing they should do is use our confidential tools for them to establish they are really who they say they are.

    There have been lots of times when we get this kind of request, and it is coming from a prankster, not from Joe Blow at all.

    If you don't have a reliable way to know that Ms Barber has an objection to this image, then please don't waste everyone's time by acting as if the harassment you claim is too obvious to require explanation, okay? Geo Swan (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan: After you were notified on your talk page of this deletion request, you made File:Lesley Barber at the Nappily Ever After Premiere (cropped).jpg. Was that prompted by the request to delete this image? It seems like an odd thing to do given the circumstances. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan: You have removed my comment here (twice) with the summary "offtopic harassment". Someone has asked for an image to be deleted, saying that they feel the image is a "form of harassment". It seems likely that they will feel the same way about the new image that you have uploaded. However this deletion discussion is closed will apply to that image as well. If you still can't understand why my comment is neither offtopic nor harassment, start a discussion on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; Original has CC license. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a CFC (Canadian Film Centre) photo and it is not in the public domain as the poster has claimed. This photo along with several others from the event are publicly accessible, but not public domain. The CFC has consulted legal counsel to clarify this matter. Therefore this photo needs to be taken down. 194.35.233.4 21:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:The 2017 Slaight Music Residency Showcase (34730771094).jpg. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is not permissible by the copyright owner - please delete Crispybcritters (talk) 01:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 05:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brought over as a cross-wiki transfer, but the image is clearly copyrighted by Goksel Arda Akar. Uploader only has 4 uploads at present, claims to be the author, but different names are given on different images. Josh (talk) 03:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Buckaroo bob 91 as Fair use (Fair use) 1989 (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (C) arr at source. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insults the proffessional status of the employment Emau steven (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you upload it then? --E4024 (talk) 15:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OoS anyway. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bobfaure (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Œuvres d'arts donc sous copyright, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire. il faut passer par Commons:OTRS/fr.

Shev123 (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 3 with OTRS permission kept, rest deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No new graphic ideas, unknown intention. unused. (probably some talkpage illustration) DePiep (talk) 00:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danilosergio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely derivative work

1989 (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + thumbnails. Ruthven (msg) 06:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 05:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol: the Cavallino isn't an "own" or free logo; and also It probably does meet the threshold of originality = copyright protection. Danyele (talk) 17:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 05:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoegazin' (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely derivative work

1989 (talk) 01:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be mislabeled. Identified as William James here: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/portrait-of-american-philosopher-psychologist-and-educator-news-photo/52270666 Ytoyoda (talk) 02:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytoyoda: Sol-lol sock. This photo is supposedly from the 14th century? Wow. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getty says it's from 1890. That makes it PD-US anyway. (expired, unpublished, doesn't really matter) Still, might as well delete as a duplicate or unuseful crop of File:William James, philosopher.jpg. The uploader has been blocked btw. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Thanks, I didn't realize the user was a sock and assuming there was a reason the subject was identified as James Parkinson. But yeah, the quality isn't great and it's not particularly useful. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above, not educationally useful. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a video still, copyright uncertain Ytoyoda (talk) 03:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brought over as a cross-wiki transfer, but the image is clearly copyright marked by Lukas Fehr. Uploader only has 4 uploads at present, claims to be the author, but different names are given on different images. Josh (talk) 03:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in Norway B dash (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS-permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free screenshot, can't really crop out the offending parts (all of it?), and de minimis doesn't apply either. Sunmist (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image was PD-text, but this one I think breaches the threshold of originality, certainly in the UK. No evidence Eurovision published it freely. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The offending user replaced the Logo of the 1960 event with an image of a promotional flyer of sorts, one that does not appear to reflect the logo of that year's contest. I reverted the upload and uploaded a better version of the original PD-text, which should be kept. Lordtobi () 19:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment In light of the above could someone please close this and revdel the offending versions? -mattbuck (Talk) 20:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above, deleted 2 version. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:59, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a picture of copyrighted object (album cover), COM:CSM#Album covers OriMica (talk) 17:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OTRS-permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ho sbagliato a caricare la foto. Mongolo1984 (talk) 23:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation week. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Building after 1990. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Building after 1990. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-textlogo, no permission. Jcb (talk) 01:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Clindberg. US logo. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Lordtobi: According to Commons:Threshold of originality#United States, the fleur-de-lis isn't even copyrightable. The Nikken logo is also more complex. A quote from the Nikken case: "copyright does not protect familiar shapes, or mere variations in size or color". So I'd say  Keep. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should  Keep it. If you look at the images that stand below the threshold of originality in the Commons pages, it is quite clear that the Bethesda logo does not stand above it in comparison, so I think it should stay.--Nasch92 (talk) 11:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Although there certainly was some effort in designing this logo in terms of layout, I think this monochrome logo is PD for the following:
1. What we have here is largely a text logo, and the text alone is clearly PD.
2. The text put aside, I see what looks to be a solid black circle made hollow by the form of a cog. The circle is then imaginarily divided into eighths, where the one on the left is replaced by the first "E", and the other two on the right and the bottom right are replaced by the second "E" and the "GAME" subtitle.
If the country of origin for this logo were somewhere other than the United States, such as the United Kingdom (where the threshold of originality is low), it would make sense to take this off of Commons because at least the slightest effort was put into the logo. But Commons uses the US law in this case, and this logo meets the definition of "made with effort, but familiar and unartistic.".Gamingforfun365 (talk) 22:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: consensus is that logo is below TOO. P 1 9 9   14:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Includents.h as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not simple geometric shape License not applicable 1989 (talk) 05:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and unused, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentified logos, which goes on a fishing page Pippobuono (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file contains a description in Persian; so we only have to find someone who can read & write both English & Persian who can help with adding a description in English & appropriate category. --Sije (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, thank you for this answer. In fact, کتاب طلایی seems to signify "Golden book", precisely. It would be a site to share books on line, see https://www.facebook.com/pg/bookgoldenn/about/?ref=page_internal ; but when you try the internet address http://bookgolden.com, you have bad surprises : you've been hooked... not a great deal, because you just have to close your browser with alt+F4, but not very cool. That's why I suggested to delete this file. Pippobuono (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo. (No idea if the person is in scope.) E4024 (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The church has several photos on the wall of martyrs from their congregation from the Iran-Iraq War. This is one of the martyrs' photos there in the church. Leviclancy (talk) 21:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9   14:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate graphic Mehlauge (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   14:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The coloration is copyrighted by Tatiana Z. The first version is possibly legal, but COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in UK for maps and the photo violates artist's (Seacroft hospital?) copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Canada for 2-dimensional art and the photo violates artist's copyright. But maybe the painting is very old? Who is the artist and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StateLionPro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selbst hochgeladen. Die Identifizierung ist nicht klar, der Name stimmt nicht. Es kann nicht wirklich bestimmt werden, was das Bild darstellt, bitte löschen. M@rcela 21:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The claimed copyvio-suspicion results from the hit of the same image on https://www.xing.com/profile/Martin_Hauber3 , as found by Patrick Rogel. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es wurde ein Copyrightverstoß festgestellt. Das Bild selbst zeigt meinem Vater der mich gebeten hat das Bild auf seinem Wikipediaeintrag hochzuladen. Er besitzt das Urheberrecht an diesem Bild und hat es mir übertragen. Ich besitze somit ebenfalls die Rechte an diesem Bild. Da ich keinen Widerspruch gegen die Löschung einreichen kann, tue ich dies nun auf diesem Wege. Ich widerspreche dem Vorwurf der Urheberrechtsverletzung! Phalos Southpaw (talk) 23:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Phalos Southpaw, in einer solchen Situation musst du eine Genehmigungserklärung bei permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org vorlegen. Daraus muss hervorgehen, wer das Originalphoto aufgenommen hat. Es sieht für mich wie das Photo von einem prof. Photographen aus, nicht wie ein selbstgemachtes Photo. Wenn dies zutrifft, muss - im Normalfall - der Photograph als Urheber genannt werden, nicht du und nicht dein Vater. Du hast dieses Photo wohl nur hochgeladen, um es in einem Wikipedia-Artikel verwenden zu können. Mit dem Hochladen auf Commons hast du es aber unter eine freie Lizenz gestellt, die jedermann erlaubt, dieses Foto nahezu beliebig zu verwenden, auch kommerziell. Dadurch werden eventuell noch bestehende Verwertungsrechte des Photographen stark beeinträchtigt.
Wenn dein Vater von dem Photographen die vollständigen Nutzungsrechte (nicht nur die einfachen) übertragen bekommen hat, dann muss er das in der o.g. Genehmigung entsprechend darlegen. Eine Textvorlage findest du hier: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber). --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hexe22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All are historical pictures from my father who died in 2014. Its ok for deletion:

which is very private.

These 3 pics:

are also private, but now in the official Archiv der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Berlin Dahlem this pic:

was found a few month ago in his papers an will soon be given to the official Archiv der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Berlin Dahlem The right on this pictures is in my hand because since his death I am the owner

The right of this pic:

was bought from Foto Wilder so the rights are also in my possession

It looks as if you want me to change attributes to these pics, but I don't know how to do that, maybe someone can help me (teamviewer?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexe22 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

kind regards; --Hexe22 (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC) Grete de Maeyer[reply]

Files uploaded by Hexe22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


1. the file "Übersetzung..." is my own file, I think that I noticed it 2. the file "Artikel J.J.Jennen..": I have an allowance with an email from the 19 feb 2019 from the actual chairmann Nancy Vercammen from ie-net (successor from the "koninkelijke vlaamse ingenieursvereniging"), who expressly allowed me to publish this article (2) as well as the translation (1)

please do not delete these historical article from 1968 about the beginning and enabling of measurement of fast reactions in 1955, that led to a nobelprize. If tried to fill in all asked questions to author, date, country of creation, copyright status and license. If I did this not in a correct way please tell me exactly which information should be corrected.

Thanks --Hexe22 (talk) 15:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: first one is out of scope and second one is missing permission. Such documents can be referenced within WP articles as source but generally are out of scope on Commons. P 1 9 9   17:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Marchjuly as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=The photograph is most likely the "own work" of the uploader, but the jersey being photographed and the logos appearing on it on almost certainly not. These might be too simple for copyright protection, but if even one isn't this would be a derivative work which cannot be kept. 1989 (talk) 05:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have opened this DR in order to have a discussion and input from other users about whether this uploader-created drawing, derived from a still copyrighted photography (see file description), does not violate the copyright of the original photographer, i.e. is legal. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Second one is definitely  Delete, because it is a very special angle and composition and coloured in the same manner as the photograph.
I am curious about this situation too. Suppose a painter can draw almost identical portraits from looking at a person directly and from a photo of the person, would the portrait based on the photo be a violation of copyright?
Or, suppose I take a photo of a person in a studio today. Another person uses the same camera model, same camera settings, same lighting, have the person sat at the same position, he would be able to take an almost identical photo. Is he violating my copyright?
Or, my friend and I use the same cellphone and have same default camera settings. We hold our phones side by side and take a photo of Eiffel tower from afar. Photos look basically identical. Or if there is one fav spot to take a photo of Eiffel tower, my friend takes one and 10 seconds later I stand at the same spot and take one almost identical. Is one violating another's copyright?
Or, if the painter never sees a person but watches a videotape of him and then draws a simplistic poker-face portrait from memory?--Roy17 (talk) 04:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A simpler thought experiment: most political cartoonists do not have a chance to meet the celebrities in real life. Are their works violation of some unknown photographer's copyright then?--Roy17 (talk) 04:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A similar image: File:Shoko Asahara.png. No free photo available, but someone drew a sketch, supposedly based on photos/videos since Shoko Asahara had been imprisoned for 20+ years. Should this be considered violation of unknown photographer/cameraman's copyright?--Roy17 (talk) 17:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: For clearly devivative works. --JuTa 05:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chapelleconstruiteen1958,noFOPinFrance.

Thesupermat (talk) 10:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:50, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://ok.ru/azerbaycanaz/topic/67391212950864 Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the uploader is planning to email OSTR to provide evidence that they are indeed the copyright holder. Pbroks13 (talk) 22:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mansurov Eldar is confirmed as the copyright holder for this image, and I believe that it is extremely likely that he is the copyright holder of this one as well. If necessary, Mansurov Eldar can email OSTR to prove that he is also the copyright holder of this image. Pbroks13 (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:46, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pffust (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely derivative work

1989 (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Ces photos montrent ma propre fille et c'est elle qui me les a données pour que je les mette sur Commons afin de rédiger un article sur elle. Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pffust (talk • contribs)

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic would most probably be PD by now, considering its age. However "own work" is not the correct licence. I have no strong feelings to get deleted a 1910s pic, less from Turkey, my country. Therefore please somebody find a formula. (I have a feeling the uploader could be the same person with the blocked User:HoMen.) Some IP or user, please help. User:Armineaghayan, User:Kareyac, User:Benoît Prieur, all pinged. E4024 (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand this deletion request. I scanned this picture myself, it was from the collection of my grand-father. It is useful to illustrate the history of the sport among Armenians in the Ottoman Empire. User:Vazken


Deleted: its not own work nor from 2012 as claimed. --JuTa 05:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violates copyright (it is a logo) Huji (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]