Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
All the other uploads by this user have been deleted as copyvios - it seems very unlikely that this is "own work" as claimed. Optimist on the run (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Not useful Jack Stupp (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:46, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Duplicata Of File:Gulf Oil LP logo.png 67.71.169.85 20:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Michael0926 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No longer exist Yann (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Image found at http://www.topesnews.info/category/2pac-logo-vector.html ; some uploads from user as already deleted for copyright reasons. Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 09:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Image found at http://www.topesnews.info/category/2pac-logo-vector.html ; some uploads from user as already deleted for copyright reasons. Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 09:55, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
non-free logo Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 09:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 10:49, 23 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I believe this is a copyvio from [1] Kalbbes (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 04:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete: (s)he nominated all the files for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vannacharal (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://www.vsanandhakrishna.com/portfolio
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
http://www.vsanandhakrishna.com/portfolio
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader nominated the files for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamagelarai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files copied from Facebook, no permission.
- File:گوندی عازەبان د.jpg
- File:گوندی سیارە.jpg
- File:گوندی زارێن.jpg
- File:گوندی دەنگەوەرە.jpg
- File:گوندی دۆڵی ناوحەد.jpg
- File:گوندی چەمەڕەش.jpg
- File:دەربەندیخان.jpg
- File:گوندی کانی توو.jpg
- File:گوندی قەرەگۆل.jpg
- File:1گوندی بەردەکەڕ.jpg
- File:گوندی میریاسی خواروو.jpg
- File:گوندی گەڕەزیل.jpg
- File:گوندی گوڕباز.jpg
- File:گوندی کانی ڕۆشنایی.jpg
- File:گوندی قەڵاسوورە.jpg
- File:گوندی قازانقایە.jpg
- File:گوندی قارەمان.jpg
- File:گوندی دەلوجە.jpg
- File:گوندی دوکەرۆ.jpg
- File:گوندی جافەران.jpg
- File:گوندی مەسۆیی.jpg
- File:گوندی سەرچاوە.jpg
- File:گوندی تەکیە.jpg
- File:گوندی بەردێ.jpg
- File:سێوسێنان.jpg
- File:گوندی گوڵانی خواروو.jpg
- File:گوندی گوڵانی سەروو.jpg
- File:گوندی کانی سێف.jpg
- File:گوندی قەڵاتێ.jpg
- File:گوندی زەنگیسەر.jpg
- File:گوندی دەرەمیانە.jpg
- File:گوندی دۆڵەسوور.jpg
- File:گوندی بۆریدەری سەروو.jpg
- File:گوندی تەڕاتەوەن.jpg
- File:گوندی وێنە.jpg
- File:گوندی هۆبەسوتە.jpg
- File:گوندی هاربڕ.jpg
- File:گوندی مڕان.jpg
- File:گوندی گۆڵێ.jpg
- File:گوندی گۆخڵان.jpg
- File:گوندی کەڕەگەڵ.jpg
- File:گوندی کانی هەرمێ.jpg
- File:گوندی کانی بی.jpg
- File:گوندی قشڵاخ.jpg
- File:گوندی عەواڵان.jpg
- File:گوندی سەیرانە.jpg
- File:گوندی دارۆخان.jpg
- File:گوندی سوراو.jpg
- File:گوندی چەرمەگا.jpg
- File:گوندی تایمەز.jpg
- File:گوندی برالە.jpg
- File:گوندی بادەڵان.jpg
- File:گوندی بالیکەدەر.jpg
- File:گوندی کانی میرانی بابەعەلی.jpg
- File:گوندی قزڵجە.jpg
- File:گوندی بناوەسوتە.jpg
- File:گوندی وێلەکەی سەروو.jpg
- File:گوندی کاژاوی حەمە ساڵەح.jpg
- File:گوندی زڕگوێزەڵە.jpg
- File:گوندی ڕازیانە.jpg
- File:گوندی دەمرکان.jpg
- File:گوندی دێی ئەلی.jpg
- File:گوندی بەردەکەڕ.jpg
- File:گوندی باڕۆیی شەهید.jpg
- File:گۆپاڵە.jpg
- File:گوندی ئاڵی گۆران.jpg
- File:گوندی هالەی مام قادر.jpg
- File:گوندی مۆرتکە.jpg
- File:گوندی کۆیک.jpg
- File:1گوندی خێوەتە.jpg
- File:گوندی خاڵدان.jpg
- File:گوندی چۆڵمک.jpg
- File:گوندی بیبیجەکی گۆران.jpg
- File:گوندی باڵاجۆ.jpg
- File:تەیناڵی کۆن.jpg
- File:تەیناڵی تازە.jpg
- File:گوندی هەنارانی سەروو.jpg
- File:گوندی قازان.jpg
- File:گوندی سۆتکە.jpg
- File:گوندی داراغا.jpg
- File:گوندی ئاشی بارام.jpg
- File:گوندی موسەک.jpg
- File:گوندی سیرین.jpg
- File:گوندی سورەدزێ.jpg
- File:گوندی گوێزەڕەش.jpg
- File:گوندی سەرخوار.jpg
- File:گوندی مۆکەبە.jpg
- File:گوندی گەڕەدێ.jpg
- File:گوندی سیتەک.jpg
- File:گوندی دووچۆمان.jpg
- File:گوندی باڵخ.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
criada incorretamente Vanessa Cherry (talk) 15:03, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-existent user, author's request. --Achim (talk) 11:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi! This is Huong Ngo. I was under the impression that I would be able to approve of the photo before it was added to Wikimedia. Please delete it. Thanks! 67.165.178.175 17:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:19, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: Author requests deletion --Krdbot 12:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
This is a logo for Minecraft. Uploader may not have the copyright of this mark. - I am Davidzdh. 08:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:36, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Unfree logo as per [2] --Krdbot 18:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
![[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Minecraft_logo.svg){kind=link}
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, unlikely to be own work.
- File:هالة فاخر.jpg
- File:Nelly Calvin.jpg
- File:Norhan is an Egyptian actress.jpg
- File:Nermin al-Faqi.jpg
- File:Nabila Obeid.jpg
- File:Monia is an Egyptian actress.jpg
- File:Magda Zaki.jpg
- File:Lucy is an Egyptian actress.jpg
- File:Fawzia Mohamed.jpg
- File:Fadia Abdel Ghani.jpg
- File:Ola Ghanem.jpg
- File:Safia El Omri.jpg
- File:An actress ZINA.jpg
- File:Suheir Ramzi.jpg
- File:Shreihan.jpg
- File:Sherine Seif El Nasr.jpg
- File:Sawsan Badr.jpg
- File:Reham Abdel Ghafour.jpg
- File:Reem Mostafa.jpg
- File:Rahma Hassan.jpg
- File:Ruby SINGER.jpg
- File:Iman Al-Assi.jpg
- File:( دينا (راقصة.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, unlikely to be own work.
- File:Sondos Belhassan.jpg
- File:سعيدة السراي.jpg
- File:Aisha Attieh.jpg
- File:سوسن معالج.jpg
- File:سنية المؤدب.jpg
- File:Samia Trabelsi.jpg
- File:Samia Rahim.jpg
- File:Reem Al Zoribi.jpg
- File:Darren Haddad.jpg
- File:Jamila Al Shehhi.jpg
- File:Kholoud Issa.jpg
- File:Haya Ibrahim.jpg
- File:هالة فاخر.jpg
- File:Nelly Calvin.jpg
- File:Norhan is an Egyptian actress.jpg
- File:Nermin al-Faqi.jpg
- File:Nahed Al-Sibai.jpg
- File:Nabila Obeid.jpg
- File:Monia is an Egyptian actress.jpg
- File:Magda Zaki.jpg
- File:Lucy is an Egyptian actress.jpg
- File:Fawzia Mohamed.jpg
- File:Fadia Abdel Ghani.jpg
- File:Ola Ghanem.jpg
- File:Safia El Omri.jpg
- File:An actress ZINA.jpg
- File:Suheir Ramzi.jpg
- File:Shreihan.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippstargard (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative work from jewelry.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippstargard (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seemingly a copyviolation. The metadata say that the author is Didier Gaillard-Hohlweg. The uploader user:Philippstargard says that the author is Philippstargard. Both can't be true at the same time.
Ies (talk) 11:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippstargard (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Unite Berlin Facade.jpg
- File:Corbusier Treppe.jpg
- File:Corbu in Berlin.jpg
- File:0M8A4121.jpg
- File:Bildschirmfoto 2018-06-16 um 02.09.30.png
- File:Faulberge stamp.png
- File:Barbie by Faberge.jpg
- File:Bildschirmfoto 2018-06-15 um 01.43.49.png
Didym (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at https://yoashtvblog.co.il/2013/אליפות-העולם-ה-14-באק-של-מוסקבה-2013-מול-רדיד-2/ Ytoyoda (talk) 20:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-Israel}}. -- Geagea (talk) 09:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
copyviol from http://www.luiginovarese.org/2018/05/14/lalmo-collegio-capranica-ricorda-quinto-anniversario-della-beatificazione/ (cropped) Antonio1952 (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mateo muro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Sarah Grilo (d. 2007), missing permission.
- File:Fernández-Muro's "La Vecina" 1945.jpg
- File:Sarah Grilo's "Pintura" 1953.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Verticales", 1955.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Progresión de una forma", 1950 (ca.).jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Puente", 1949.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Pintura", 1958.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Gris plomizo (Leaden gray)", 1969.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Banda Roja", 1981.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Cuadrados superpuestos", 1970.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Pintura - Gradus ad Parnassum", 1979.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "El libro de las horas", 1979.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Cover on white", 1966.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Horizonte Violeta", 1961.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "To the great people of Argentina (Al Gran Pueblo Argentino)", 1964.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "En Rojos", 1959.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Silvered circle (Círculo azogado)", 1963.jpg
- File:Fernández-Muro's "Banner", 1963.jpg
- File:Sarah Grilo's "(Bright Green) Verde Brillante", 1962.jpg
- File:Sarah Grilo's "Add", 1965.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22,_1969.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22,_1964.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22,_1963.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Verde_Brillante%22,_1962.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Spam + likely copyright violation ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 01:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gelson Mario Fançony (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, nonsense upload, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Note the nonsense category.
Ies (talk) 04:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gelson Mario Fançony (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, nonsense upload, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Note the nonsense category.
Ies (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Cantor o Tal menino do ta fazer tentem QM já ouvido? Gelson Mario Fançony (talk) 11:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope. The images visible are seemingly copyvios.
Ies (talk) 05:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Blurry photo about non-notable people, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vickry hidayatullah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
The person in the picture does not want the picture on the net. Please delete it. OtisRight (talk) 16:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope and per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
self promotion of uploader, questionable copyrights, out of scope
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 51.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 50.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author and Speaker 01.png
- File:Kit Gupta Author and Speaker 02.jpg
- File:Author & Speaker Kit Gupta 03.jpg
- File:Author & Speaker Kit Gupta 02.jpg
- File:Author & Speaker Kit Gupta 01.png
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 15.png
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 16.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 14.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 13.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 11.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 12.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 10.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 08.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 09.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 06.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 07.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 01.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 05.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 04.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 03.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta Author Speaker 02.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 22.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 23.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 21.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 20.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 19.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 16.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 17.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 18.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 15.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 14.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 13.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 12.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 11.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 10.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 09.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 08.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 07.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 06.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 05.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 04.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 03.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 02.jpg
- File:Author Speaker Kit Gupta 01.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta 2.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta 1.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta 3.jpg
- File:Kit Gupta.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 19:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Amada44 talk to me 20:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). Hiàn (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cwek as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: a copyrighted logo. It may be too simplistic. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: We can't confirm whether the uploader is the copyright holders of this logo. And According to Commons:Licensing, Maybe this file is not suited with the PNG filetype and the TM mark. --Cwek (talk) 01:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: text logo. --INeverCry 00:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified and unused logo, could also be advertising/promotional based on uploader's username. Wcam (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified and unused logo, could also be advertising/promotional based on uploader's username. Wcam (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image with no foreseeable educational use. Probable vandalism. Hiàn (talk) 22:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Zero abuse 115.178.236.249 00:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio/out of scope. --Guanaco (talk) 15:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Stylised graphic element top left is not necessarily simple , w:File:Nvidia CUDA Logo.jpg was non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- The NVIDIA logo should be fine in the US. It looks no more complex than examples shown in Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_States. --Wcam (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: similar complexity as the Best Western logo. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Last decision was a poor one. We already decided to delete this logo. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The eye logo seems non-trivial to me, and more original than the Best Western design. I consider this a borderline case, but COM:PCP. --Guanaco (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Seems too complex for PD-textlogo. Previously deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:AXXo.jpg without any discussion around complexity. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Way too complex. I've made logos like these (pre-Windows days). It takes quite some time and effort to get a good result. No way can it be described as a simple shape. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Used only for spamming the English Wikipedia. See this edit Whpq (talk) 00:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; also no source for this apparent derivative work. --Guanaco (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
There are so many problems with this. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio for one. --Guanaco (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Book cover of Charles Dickens Oliver Twist, uploaded from Kazakh Wikipedia. No information about when this edtion was published and who designed the book cover. Uploaded by hit-and-run contributor with only two known contributions to Wikimedia projects. Thuresson (talk) 04:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history Микола Василечко (talk) 06:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NARAYANJEE MISHRA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, commons is not an advertisement site. Personal pictures
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded. Sajal Jeet Saaz (talk) 15:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded. Sajal Jeet Saaz (talk) 15:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload. --Guanaco (talk) 15:28, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Not useful Jack Stupp (talk) 06:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
the owner of the pict demand a delete ,and she didnt like it to be posted Haleeet (talk) 14:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
im using it as a joke at first and now the owner is mad at me, please help me delete it admin... Haleeet (talk) 14:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
please.. delete it quickly as my friend keep being mad at me Haleeet (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
can you please also delete the title? cause my friend , who own that names doesnt like her name to appear on google. thanks a lot Haleeet (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING. No evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Phylogeography-of-Rift-Valley-Fever-Virus-in-Africa-and-the-Arabian-Peninsula-pntd.0005226.s011.ogv
[edit]This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted Google imagery Guanaco (talk) 09:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the tower is modern. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Although this video is licensed under Creative Commons, various copyrighted songs are played throughout it. ℯxplicit 00:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Uploading a version without audio. Once this is done we'll revdel the with-audio version. Guanaco (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Audio removed. --Guanaco (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
No need of this file Tanujchoudhary1994 (talk) 06:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
NO need of this file, wrongly uploaded Tanujchoudhary1994 (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arturprada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Юрий Жуков.jpg
- File:Рокотов Ян.png
- File:Как живёт фальшивомонетчик сегодня..jpg
- File:Суд и приговор..jpg
- File:Любимые деньги Баранова..jpg
- File:Неожиданное разоблачение..jpg
- File:Примерный семьянин и трудолюбивый водитель..jpg
- File:Самообразование фальшивомонетчика.jpg
- File:Виктор Иванович Баранов.jpg
- File:.22e4891e594e9ba529f4b7898544097c 1200x630.jpg
- File:Подвалы Саук-Дере.png
- File:Памятник Петру Тихоновичу Тарану.jpg
- File:Saukdere3-630x420.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaioantonovich (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web (some files are cropped). Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Uploaded since 07.2017.
- File:Illarion Illarionovich Vorontsov-Dashkov.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna visitando Dmitri Leonidovich na frente de batalha.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna com seus filhos ,leonid e Alexandra no exílio.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna, Dmitri leonidovich e filha Alexandra.jpg
- File:Paulo Pavlovich Shuvalov.gif
- File:Dmitri Alexandrovich Obolensky.jpg
- File:Alexandre Nikolaevich Fersen.jpg
- File:Praskovia Dmitrievna 1.jpg
- File:Maria Pavlovna Shuvalova,1914.jpg
- File:Sergei Dmitrievich Sheremetev.jpg
- File:Catherine pavlona Sheremeteva.jpg
- File:Catherine Pavlovna Sheremeteva 1.jpg
- File:Sofia Ivanovna Vorontsova-Dashkova com seu irmão mais novo.jpg
- File:Praskovia Dmitrievna Sheremeteva com Roman Petrovich.jpg
- File:Prascovia Dmitrievna Sheremeteva com Maria Illarionovna Vorontosova-Dashkova , Irina Alexandrovna Romanova e Irina Paley.jpg
- File:Praskovia Dmitrievna Sheremeteva com sua família.jpg
- File:Prascovia Dmitrievna Sheremeteva com o filho mais velho.jpg
- File:Filhas de Alexandra Pavlovna.jpg
- File:Irina Illarionovna Sheremeteva.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Dmitrievna com Boris Leonidovich 2.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Dmitrievna com Boris Leonidovich 1.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Dmitrievna com Boris Leonidovich.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna no exílio.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna Shuvalova (Viazemskaya) na frente de batalha.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna Shuvalova 1.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna Shuvalova.jpg
- File:Família Viazemsky.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna Shuvalova com Sofia Ivanovna Vorontsova-Dashkova.jpg
- File:Sofia Ivanovna Vorontsova-Dashkova.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Dmitrievna Sheremeteva.jpg
- File:Maria Pavlovna Shuvalova.jpg
- File:Alexandra Pavlovna.jpg
- File:Nicolau Vladimirovich Sultanov.jpg
- File:Mansão kologrivov.jpg
- File:Vorontsov-Dashkov e Romanov 1880´s.jpg
- File:Vorotnsov-dashkov e Romanov.jpg
- File:Elizabeth andreevna shuvalova.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Andreevna.jpg
- File:Paulo Pavlovich Shuvalov.jpg
- File:Elizabeth andreevna.jpg
- File:Pavel pavlovich.jpg
- File:Alexandra-illarionovna.gif
- File:Alexandra illarionovna.gif
- File:Alexandra illarionovna.jpg
- File:Alexandra Georgievna com paulo.jpg
- File:Maria pavlovna.jpg
- File:Maria pavlovna e guilherme.jpg
- File:Alix Grega e Ella.jpg
- File:Alexandra Georgievna 1889.png
- File:Alix Grega Com Paulo.jpg
- File:Propríedade Novo Tomnikovo.jpg
_na_frente_de_batalha.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 12:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaioantonovich (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files were tagged as {{Dw no source since}} by @Ronhjones: . They are clearly not the work of the uploader but they do look ike they may be old enough to be in the public domain in some form but without additional information this cannot be determined. We need to know:
- who took each photo;
- when was each photo taken;
- where was each photo taken i.e. the country (even if it no longer exists);
- when did the photographer die;
Any extra information is also welcome.
- File:Lily Andreevna.jpg
- File:Shuvalov family.jpg
- File:Asya Shuvalova.jpg
- File:Pavlik Shuvalov.jpg
- File:Maio Shuvalova.jpg
- File:Irmãs Vorontsov-Dashkov.jpg
- File:Sandra minueto 1888.jpg
- File:Sandra e Paulo 1891.jpg
- File:Sandra em picnic.jpg
- File:Shuvalov e Romanov.jpg
- File:Vorontsov-Dashkov e Romanov.jpg
- File:Sandra criança.jpg
- File:Sandra e Sasha 1908.jpg
- File:Sandra e Ilarion Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Funeral P.P Shuvalov.jpg
- File:Sandra Shuvalova 1888.jpg
- File:Sandra Shuvalova 1889.jpg
- File:Ivan Illarionovich Vorontsov-Dashkov.jpg
- File:Ivan Illarionovich.jpg
- File:Sandra com Paulo e irmãs 1891.jpg
Green Giant (talk) 12:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:51, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ізотов Анатолій (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images of different authors (Максим Иванов, Проект «Школи Лохвицького земства», НТА Інститут «УкрНДІпроектерставрація», etc.) without permissions.
- File:Будівля водолікарні в Миргороді.gif
- File:Миргородська водолікарня2.jpg
- File:Миргородська водолікарня1.jpg
- File:Kosyyanenko Volodimir Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Вiсник 5-6.jpg
- File:Вiсник 1.jpg
- File:Вiсник 3-4.jpg
- File:Вiсник 2.jpg
- File:Соловйов Кирил Сергеевич.jpg
- File:Годованюк Елена Марковна.jpg
- File:Varvynskyi Varva 44-ChH 02.jpg
- File:Varvynskyi Makushykha 55-ChH 01.jpg
- File:Romenskyi Yaroshivka 2008-08-17 03.jpg
- File:Varvynskyi Brahyntsi Ch 01.jpg
- File:Romenskyi Nova-Hreblia 01 1915.jpg
- File:Lokvytskiy Lutsenki 01.jpg
- File:Romenskyi Holinka 2009-09-02 02.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi Tokari 02.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi Sencha 01.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi Pisochky 01.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi Pisky 04.jpg
- File:Hnidyntsi passport.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi Luka 04.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi Bilohorilka L2.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi Berbenytsi L2.jpg
- File:Horodysche passport.jpg
- File:Степухи. Лохвицький район.jpg
- File:Старий хутір. Лохвицький район.jpg
- File:Рудка. Лохвицький район.jpg
- File:Западинці. Лохвицький район.jpg
- File:Шевченкове. Лохвицький район.jpg
- File:Ручки. Лохвицкий район.jpg
- File:Лучка. Лохвицкий район.jpg
- File:Диховична Наталія Олександрівна. Інститут «УкрНДІпроектреставрація».jpg
- File:Білецька Олена Платонівна Інститут "УкрНДІпроектреставрація".jpg
- File:Антонюк Анатолій Євдокимович інститут "УкрНДІпроектреставрація".jpg
- File:Дегтярьов Михайло Георгійович.jpg
- File:Ізотов Анатолій Олександрович.jpg
- File:Церква спаса на Берестові. Модель1.jpg
- File:Бєзякін Володимир Миколайович.jpg
- File:Інститут "УкрНДІпроектреставрація".jpg
- File:Трест "Будмонумент".jpg
- File:НАПАДІВКА 1.jpg
- File:Вісник інституту "УкрНДІпроектреставрація".jpg
- File:Школа Лохвицького земства4.jpg
- File:Школа Лохвицького земства5.jpg
- File:Школа Лохвицького земства2.jpg
- File:Школа Лохвицького земства3.jpg
- File:Школа Лохвицького земства.jpg
- File:План. Кизливка.jpg
- File:Школа в Чорухах. Фото В.Лисенко. 1980.jpg
- File:Школа в Чорухах. Архівне фото.jpg
- File:Будинок земськоъ школи в с. Риги.jpg
- File:Малюнок Опанаса Сластіона.jpg
- File:Школи Лохвицького земства. Заставка.jpg
- File:Школа в Христанівці. Східний фасад.jpg
- File:Школа в Христанівці. План.jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (12).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (11).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (9).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (10).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (8).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (7).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (6).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (5).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (4).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (3).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (1).jpg
- File:Христановка. школа (2).jpg
- File:Школа в Христанівці.jpg
- File:Світличне.jpg
- File:Білоцерківці.jpg
- File:Окіп.jpg
- File:Яблінівка.jpg
- File:Млини2.jpg
- File:Синяківщина.jpg
- File:Нетратівка.jpg
- File:Бондарі.jpg
- File:Курінька.jpg
- File:Мокіївка.jpg
- File:Сластион.jpg
- File:Двокласна школа.jpg
- File:Трикласна школа.png
- File:Двокомплектна школа.png
- File:Однокласна школа.png
- File:Школи Лохвицького земства.png
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 28.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 27.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 26.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 25.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 24.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 22.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 23.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 21.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 20.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 19.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 18.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 17.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 16.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 15.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 14.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 13.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 11.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 12.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 10.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 09.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 08.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 07.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 06.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 05.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 04.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 03.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 02.jpg
- File:2016 Kharsiky Chornukhynskyi 01.jpg
- File:Lokhvytskyi povit edite.jpg
- File:Школа в Харсіках. Паспорт.jpg
- File:План школи Харсіки.jpg
- File:Земська школа в Харсіках.jpg
- File:Школа в Харсіках.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Anatoliy (talk) 13:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Author’s name missing, no indication this could be public domain. 95.84.163.244 19:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Extended metadata show that is likely to be a copyrighted image by Eurokinissi a greek photo agency cubic[*]star 18:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:18, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elsever Novruzov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Fəzail məkəbdə.jpg
- File:Pənah Qurbanov.jpg
- File:Vaqif Qurbanov.jpg
- File:Sabir Əsədov Coğrafiya.jpg
- File:Rauf elm.jpg
- File:Rauf kibernetik.jpg
- File:Niyazi Həsənov İqtisadi forumda.png
- File:Niyazi Həsənov.png
- File:Rusya bazarı.jpg
- File:Qanlı yanvar.jpg
- File:Təndir çörəyinin .jpg
- File:Müharibə 1941-1945.jpg
- File:Əhali 01.01.2018.jpg
- File:Bakı 2015.jpg
- File:Marketlər.jpg
- File:Iş yeri.jpg
- File:Ibadət yeri.jpg
- File:2008 ziyarət.jpg
- File:2016 futbol.jpg
- File:İbrahim Musa oğlu Qurbanov.jpg
- File:İbrahim Qurbanov .png
- File:Su Təmizləyici qurğu.jpg
- File:Cənnatalı Alxanov.jpg
- File:60-saylı dairə.jpg
- File:Yol tikintisi.jpg
- File:Fəzail.jpg
- File:Pambiq sahəsi.jpg
- File:Gerb 33.png
- File:Ramin Hüseynov.jpg
- File:Ruslan Rüstəmov.jpg
- File:Qarabağlı 1 saylı orta məktəb.jpg
- File:Dərələyəz TM.jpg
- File:9 may 2016 babas dadasov.jpg
- File:Qarabagli.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:51, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elsever Novruzov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, too many different camera types. To be reviewed.
- File:Niyazi 2018.jpg
- File:Samuh şehri.jpg
- File:Lövhə.jpg
- File:Zuvend 01.jpg
- File:Kerimbeyli.jpg
- File:Dedeli.jpg
- File:Goygol ili 2017 Aze.pdf
- File:Basarili yol Oguz 2017.pdf
- File:Birinci varlı.jpg
- File:Poct 1.jpg
- File:Həsənov Ə..jpg
- File:Əsəd Həsənov Səfirlik.jpg
- File:Əsəd veteran.jpg
- File:Qarabağlı kəndi.jpg
- File:Qarabağlı kənd məzarlığı.jpg
- File:Kür şayı.jpg
- File:Poçt Binası.jpg
- File:Rabitə və Poçt binası..jpg
- File:Servis Hyundai.jpg
- File:Büst BD.jpg
- File:Fəzail görüş.jpg
- File:Istixana 2.jpg
- File:Istixana 1.jpg
- File:Nəmənd 3.jpg
- File:Kənd.jpg
- File:Dini 1.jpg
- File:Market 3.jpg
- File:Market .jpg
- File:Dərələyəz TM 1.jpg
- File:Mədəniyyət evi 1.jpg
- File:Mədəniyyət evi.jpg
- File:Qarabağlı 2 saylı tam orta məktəb.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly COM:NETCOPYVIOs, for example: some explicitly retain an "Azerbaijan Photo" watermark (e.g., File:Birinci varlı.jpg, File:Poct 1.jpg), which is "© 2012. Copyright Azerbaijans.com," while others appear to have had it deliberately cropped out (e.g., File:Kerimbeyli.jpg is this; File:Qarabağlı kənd məzarlığı.jpg is this; etc.). Other images are COM:DWs (e.g., File:Goygol ili 2017 Aze.pdf), bizzare screenshots of Wiki pages, and otherwise problematic per nom, previous DRs, PRP, usw. --Эlcobbola talk 15:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:06012018 capture casamance forest.jpg
- File:Rtbds 1.jpg
- File:Senegal lago .jpg
- File:Dakar33333.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:46, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Poster account (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Poster account (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:07, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 08:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:07, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Non-free TV screenshot Thyj (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:22, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
COM:Flickrwashing --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, copyvio. - Jmabel ! talk 15:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:22, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
copyviol from http://www.diocesiadriarovigo.it/vescovo/stemma/ Antonio1952 (talk) 17:38, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete drawing by Enzo Parrino (still living Italian armorist). Kathisma (talk) 23:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted already by Yann. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong person in picture. 2601:644:500:2F76:75E2:1E8D:BCAF:305D 17:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- So ein Quatsch. —Granada (talk) 17:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Troll request --Stepro (talk) 18:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- +1.
Speedy keep --DCB (talk) 17:22, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Subject died in 1979, image unlikely to be “own work” created in 2018 Ytoyoda (talk) 20:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: likely source is album cover scan[3]. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded incorrectly Aab 47 (talk) 20:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded incorrectly Aab 47 (talk) 20:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
very bad quality, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Photo is by Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images from 1967. Is it PD for any reason? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Original image no longer exists 186.77.163.57 22:38, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep: the source was reviewed, no reason given to doubt the licence.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Odysseus1479. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Original image no longer exists 186.77.163.57 22:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep the source was reviewed, no reason given to doubt the licence.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Odysseus1479. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment Here's a photo 
from me from the same day, but from a completely different place! I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. Tm (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place! I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Also as you say, this image is completely different from the other. Tm (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo 
from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. And these weren't taken at the same time , as the exif says one was taken in 10:42:46 and the other at 12:42:10Tm (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. And these weren't taken at the same time , as the exif says one was taken in 10:42:46 and the other at 12:42:10- Tm (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
License violation. Copyright infringement. I'm not the author of this photo. Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place. I could not be in these two places on the same day, because it's impossible, they are miles away. In addition, only the descent from the Vihorlat peak takes some 3-4 hours in the winter, and then it moves to the next mountain range (1,5-2 hours in the winter with car transport) and gets to the top to peak (Pľaša) in the winter these are many hours, it is unrealistic. Please check exif information and GPS location of peaks. Another thing was a completely different camera. Please delete photos are not mine. Milan Bališin (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
License violation. Copyright infringement. I'm not the author of this photo. Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place. I could not be in these two places on the same day, because it's impossible, they are miles away. In addition, only the descent from the Vihorlat peak takes some 3-4 hours in the winter, and then it moves to the next mountain range (1,5-2 hours in the winter with car transport) and gets to the top to peak (Pľaša) in the winter these are many hours, it is unrealistic. Please check exif information and GPS location of peaks. Another thing was a completely different camera. Please delete photos are not mine. Milan Bališin (talk) 19:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete File:Ďurkovec 01.JPG, File:Pľaša 02.JPG, File:Pľaša 01.JPG, and File:Riaba skala 03.JPG. This user's other photos were all taken with a Nikon Coolpix. These alone were taken with a Canon Powershot. It's perfectly reasonable that someone who is now an experienced Wikimedian might have, early in their Wiki-career, uploaded something that someone else created not realizing that this wasn't okay. Milan Bališin (talk · contribs) has hundreds of photos and is asking to delete four that were taken with a different camera and he or she claims are copyright violations. I don't see a reason not to accept the user at their word. Milan Bališin, it would be nice if this could be consolidated rather than having four separate discussions for each of these files. --B (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Did you look at the other photo that Milan Bališin linked? This image was taken in Poland an hour after the other image was taken in Slovakia. Granted, Slovakia and Poland border each other, it seems more likely that the user is telling the truth - that when he first signed up for Wikipedia he didn't know any better and uploaded someone else's image. I'll let you in on a deep, dark, secret - I did the same thing - 13 years ago when I first signed up for Wikipedia, I uploaded a photo from the website of an organization of which I am a member, not knowing that this was not okay, and without permission from the photographer. Some time later, the photographer complained to me about it (I had long since forgotten it) and I apologized and had it deleted. --B (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- This user has repeatedly made up statements in an attempt to revoke their contributions. I don't believe a word of what they say. I am closing this again, because the user started this nomination just ours after they got warned not to do that. I had to close a large number of their repeated nominations today, enough is enough. Jcb (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Did you look at the other photo that Milan Bališin linked? This image was taken in Poland an hour after the other image was taken in Slovakia. Granted, Slovakia and Poland border each other, it seems more likely that the user is telling the truth - that when he first signed up for Wikipedia he didn't know any better and uploaded someone else's image. I'll let you in on a deep, dark, secret - I did the same thing - 13 years ago when I first signed up for Wikipedia, I uploaded a photo from the website of an organization of which I am a member, not knowing that this was not okay, and without permission from the photographer. Some time later, the photographer complained to me about it (I had long since forgotten it) and I apologized and had it deleted. --B (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked - this user keeps mass nominating their contributions for deletion and is changing their statements all the time in an attempt to revoke their contributions. This has been going on for about a year now, enough is enough. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place! I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Also as you say, this image is completely different from the other. Tm (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
_05.JPG){kind=link}
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
_05.JPG){kind=link}
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. Tm (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Also file in use in sk.wikipedia.org Čergovský Minčol. Tm (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Also file in use in sk.wikipedia.org Čergovský Minčol. Tm (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-5){kind=link}
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
These are old photographs, extremely unlikely they are own work as claimed. Correct date and authorship information is needed to determine copyright status.
Guanaco (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
all very high quality images, yet they nearly all have different cameras and exif data dates, very likely all stolen from online
- File:Luna.llena.jpg
- File:Otoño.de.calabaza.jpg
- File:Calabaza.ardiente.jpg
- File:Flamengo-2900510.jpg
- File:Tiger-2929968.jpg
- File:Landscape-2923850.jpg
- File:Un Aguila.jpg
- File:La primavera de las aves.jpg
- File:Colibri Colorido.jpg
- File:Otoño.Naturaleza.jpg
- File:Arboles al Amanecer.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 19:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Previously deleted as too complex at File:CJ E&M Logo.png and File:CJ E&M LOGO.png Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: By Ronhjones. — regards, Revi 03:29, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suryavanshipd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seemingly copyvios. Note the missing sources (there is some other text) and the different photo authors. There is no proof that these athors allow publishing their images under a free license.
- File:Chinchoticha Waghoba.jpg
- File:Waghoba shrine at Choukunde, goa.jpg
- File:Waghoba shrine at Ughem, Goa.jpg
Ies (talk) 04:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deleteCan be tagged with Template:no source since.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographers should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
carte tronquée Nacermek (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Cette carte ne représente pas le Maroc dans toutes ses frontières. 195.36.239.236 08:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Same request as last year. The situation has not changed since. Ydecreux (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- The "missing part" has not been recognised as belonging to Morocco by any country except Morocco. Neither is it recognised as belonging to another country or as an autonomous territory. This unclear situation is depicted by the dotted line in the South part of the map. Besides, this map is perfect to locate any large Moroccan city and as such is useful. Ydecreux (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep of course, per Ydecreux, and still (and will be) in use. NNW 09:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Morocco isnot complteted with his sahara 105.188.66.36 23:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Same as usual. Tiring demands. Sting (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Senseless to discuss anything. NNW 07:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use File:Morocco Western Sahara location map.png if you don't like this version. --Achim (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
la carte géographique du Maroc est erronée 160.179.58.194 05:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Groundhog day. NNW 06:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Use File:Morocco Western Sahara location map.png if you don't like this version. --Achim55 (talk) 12:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlexPeterBertha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files without evidence of a free license, and/or a proper license.
- File:Peterson House 2.png
- File:Peterson House 1.jpg
- File:Leo Thomas 2.jpg
- File:Leo Thomas 1.jpg
- File:Sheraden Homestead 4.png
- File:Sheraden Homestead 2.jpg
- File:Sheraden Homestead.jpg
- File:Albright United Methodist Church 2.jpg
- File:Albright United Methodist Church.png
- File:Overbrook Municipal Building in 1934.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographers must confirm the free licenses by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Football trophies depictions
[edit]Per previous DR: (1), (2). Derivative works of trophies awarded by FIFA since the 1990s, and therefore copyrighted (FIFA Club WC first in 2000, Confederations Cup in 1992, Golden Glove in 1994, Women's WC in 1991, among others).
Files affected:
- File:FIFA Confederations Cup trophy icon.png
- File:FIFA Youth Cup.svg
- File:Golden Glove.png
- File:FIFA Club World Cup.jpg
- File:FIFA Club World Cup.svg
- File:FIFA Club World Cup2.png
- File:Trofeu mundial fifa01.svg
- File:Troféu do Mundial da FIFA de 2012 do Corinthians.JPG
- File:England Women's Vs USA (16367186239).jpg
- File:England Women's Vs USA (18311030520).jpg
- File:FIFA Women's World Cup trophy (16276997353).jpg
- File:FIFA Women's World Cup trophy (16896079511) new version.jpg
- File:FIFA Women's World Cup trophy (16896079511).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_new_version.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fma12 (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)- @Storkk: The user Fma12 did not inform the uploaders of the files. I do not agree with the deletion. --Horcrux (talk) 09:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Horcrux I have restored the files and will relist the DR on today's log. Unfortunately, the trophies are certainly copyrighted, and so these derivatives will indeed, IMO, have to be deleted. Delete. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Horcrux I have restored the files and will relist the DR on today's log. Unfortunately, the trophies are certainly copyrighted, and so these derivatives will indeed, IMO, have to be deleted.
- @Storkk: The user Fma12 did not inform the uploaders of the files. I do not agree with the deletion. --Horcrux (talk) 09:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete As the original nominator of these files, I keep the same position because of the reasons given above, although I didn't know that not having notified the uploader was a solid argument to restore all the trophies depictions. - Fma12 (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Golden Glove.png. This isn't a unique design, or idea, it has been used in other sports such as boxing and baseball. None of the details are shared with the actual trophy either.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the first 6 files for the reasons already explained in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MacMoreno. --Horcrux (talk) 11:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete All the first 6 files (with the exception of the Golden Glove) are not simple re-creations with no resemble with the original trophies; they are accurate enough to be considered copyvios. Keep only for the *File:Golden Glove.png as @BevinKacon: mentioned. Fma12 (talk) 13:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Munclub.jpg: This is a REPLICA of the FIFA Club World Cup trophy and the image is properly licensed. --Naldo Arruda (talk) 21:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Naldo Arruda: "Replica" means an accurate copy of the original trophy (which is copyrighted). As launched in 2000 and it is the main subject of the photo, {{PD-old}} or de minimis do not apply in this case. So IMO it should be also deleted. Fma12 (talk) 00:28, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Fma12: FIFA asked to delete the files? The trophy can be "protected", but the image is not, it is free. It is difficult to do visual works in this way. What is the solution? Naldo Arruda (talk)
- @Naldo Arruda: As only free images are accepted on Commons, p.e. in the case of copyrighted football trophies the solution is to upload them as "non-free images to illustrate the articles, such as FIFA Club World Cup or Copa Libertadores. - Fma12 (talk) 03:37, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: the first 6 per discussion (they are new works, very different from the original cups), deleted the others. Ruthven (msg) 11:34, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nabeel Akram Minhas (talk · contribs)
[edit]mix of watermarked uploads, different resolutions and exif, likely all stolen from online
- File:Altit-fort-of-Hunza-Valley-Gilgit-Baltistan-Pakistan.-620x350.jpg
- File:Karakoram-highway-Xingiang-region.jpg
- File:Culture-of-gilgit-baltistan-15-638.jpg
- File:Shandur-Polo-Festival.jpg
- File:Nanga-Parbat-Wallpaper.jpg
- File:Baltit-Fort-Gilgit-5.jpg
- File:44887261 k2 sumit 466.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/wallpaper insource:people/93075613
[edit]Invalid copyright claim by Flickr uploader Alex Micheu, this user usually watermarks their images none of these have watermarks. File:Highlands-wallpaper-2560x1600 (9045439496).jpg stolen from a website, all others have borders and or no exif data. File names also different from all their other files.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Highlands-wallpaper-2560x1600 (9045439496).jpg
- File:Swan 2-wallpaper-2560x1600 Fotor (8934764890).jpg
- File:Sunrise 18-wallpaper-2560x1600 Fotor (8946536237).jpg
- File:Squirrel on the tree-wallpaper-2560x1600 Fotor (8934150935).jpg
- File:Ladybug on dandelion flowers-wallpaper-1920x1200 Fotor (8934151889).jpg
- File:Merced river yosemite-wallpaper-2048x1152 Fotor (8934766370).jpg
- File:Underwater passage las vegas-wallpaper-2560x1600 Fotor (8934149299).jpg
- File:Desktop-background-wallpapers-animal-18077 (8934176159).jpg
- File:Wallpapers-dirt-nature-road-hdr-hd-widescreen-high-definition-2560x1600 Snapseed (8947159906).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete agree highly suspicious, they look professional and they've also all been deleted from Flickr too. Delete. - MPF (talk) 22:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations/license laundering. --Storkk (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/tonynetone
[edit]All need to be re-licensed. Some may be PD-USGov (no, quality too low) or they already exist on Commons with another filename. This Flickr user is.. well, see for yourself.
- File:Tonynetone - Total solar eclipse 2009 (by).jpg (low)
- is of low quality, it does not shows the details of Diamond ring Phenomena during a Solar Eclipse, which is the only informational /academic value of the image.N Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Agatha Christie Memorial, London-12438790945.png
- File:2013 Lunar Eclipses- Apr 25, 2013 (8722010709).jpg (low)
- do not have any unique qualityN Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Partial lunar eclipse today (4237450525).jpg (low)
- do not have any unique qualityN Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Partial lunar eclipse 16 August 2008 (2804675540).jpg (low)
- File:Moon (3307422404).jpg (low)
- do not have any unique qualityN Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Full eclipse of the moon (5837179480).jpg (low)
- It shows the Red moon phenomena during a full lunar eclipse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanu N (talk • contribs) 06:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Partial lunar eclipse 16 August 2008 (2803835525).jpg (low)
- do not have any unique qualityN Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Blue Moon By Tony August Blue Moon (9658127622).jpg (low, he claims to have taken this picture himself)
- do not have any unique qualityN Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:John Belushi.jpg (collage with unknown origins)
- File:Total eclipse on winter solstice day (5215606826).jpg (low)
- do not have any unique qualityN Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Medieval Art and Architecture.jpg (File:Transportation of the body of St Mark - St Mark's Basilica n01.jpg is better)
- File:Blue Moon (2636140641).jpg (low)
- do not have any unique quality (Blue Moon is not at all blie in colour! N Sanu / എന് സാനു / एन सानू 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanu N (talk • contribs) 06:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Most are low quality which I marked "(low)", similar images for the memorial are in Category:Agatha Christie Memorial, London. The low quality shots are perhaps own work, but we seem to have many images of eclipses anyway. Any astronomers around here? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry but I don't understand this. What is wrong with the license? This is the only picture of that side of the memorial --Judithcomm (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Judithcomm: see this request. There is really no telling which (if any) pictures from this Flickr user are own work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Judithcomm: I see you were right about that photo being the only one of that side of the memorial. Were right, past tense, I transferred some photos from Flickr to Category:Agatha Christie Memorial, London. File:Agatha Christie Memorial, London-12438790945.png is strange, low resolution and in PNG format. I wouldn't trust it given the other pictures they put on their Flickr. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, that's cleared things up. Thanks --Judithcomm (talk) 00:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry but I don't understand this. What is wrong with the license? This is the only picture of that side of the memorial --Judithcomm (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, marginally fine for me. --B dash (talk) 14:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I asked N sanu to take a look at the eclipse pictures. (thanks for checking them!) I'm counting seven deletes and two weak keeps. One of those is File:Full eclipse of the moon (5837179480).jpg. The description for that image says "Full eclipse of the moon occurs tonight." and the picture is claimed to have been taken and uploaded on June 15 2011. So it's suspect.
- I found the other one. File:Tonynetone - Total solar eclipse 2009 (by).jpg is a photoshopped version of File:Total solar eclipse 1999.jpg, beyond any doubt. @B dash: still think this is ok? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely uncredited derivative works, and copyright violations. I don't understand the vk arguments, given that they don't seem to hinge on authorship or copyright questions. --Storkk (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katko2147483648 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private images / nonsense uploads. Note the nonsense categories.
- File:Karmenpalbalaz.jpg
- File:Panelakstarkejmajki.jpg
- File:Cechy-972112313300581.jpg
- File:Cechy-201703012402184.jpg
- File:Papezfrantisekfrancuzko.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
FIFA WC Trophies
[edit]Per previous DR: (1): (2) - Derivative works of modern 3D sculpture that are copyrighted by FIFA. The FIFA WC trophy was designed in 1974 by Italian artist Silvio Gazzaniga, who is still alive. The Young WC trophy was designed in 1979, also copyrighted.
Files affected:
- File:FIFA World Cup.jpg
- File:FIFA U-20 World Cup.svg
- File:FIFA Confederations Cup (Cup).svg
- File:FIFA U-20 World Cup 2013.svg
- File:FIFA U-17 World Cup.svg
.svg){kind=link}
Fma12 (talk) 23:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- The photograph was taken withing a public space and does not infringe the copyright holder's ability to earn money from the work. I have no comment on the svgs. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:04, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The photograph is a derivative work of an object (in this case, a 3D work, the trophy itself) which is copyrighted by its author since 1974. Authorship issue is clearly explained here: (p.e): "By taking a picture with a copyrighted work depicted as its main subject, for example, the photographer creates a new, copyrighted work (the photograph), but the rights of the work's creator still affect the resulting photograph..."
- As the trophy is the main subject of the photo, de minimis principle can't be applied, unlike photos such as this one or this another. - Fma12 (talk) 12:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos, drawings and documents. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:テコちゃん.jpg
- File:昼下がりの坂道.png
- File:感謝状東大阪市.png
- File:初期の漫画作品.jpg
- File:ディズニーのサイン入り写真.jpg
- File:漫画作品.jpg
- File:作品名：昼下がりの坂道.png
- File:作品展.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Proper source / licence needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:神明宮大木
[edit]- File:Minako Yoshino "The Sleeping Mermaid" 2015.jpg
- File:Minako Yoshino's Holocaust Memorial "Children reading a history book" 2018.jpg
The files are images of sculptures at Edgewater, New Jersey, US by artist Minako Yoshino. As the US does not grant FOP for sculptures, the file may be unfree. An OTRS permission is needed.--廣九直通車 (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket:2018071410000169. --whym (talk) 01:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
The person in the picture does not want the picture on the net. OtisRight (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:41, 3 August 2018 UTC: Personal photos by non-contributors --Krdbot 00:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KelleyRush (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Company does not meet our notability criteria. Chinese wikipedia article (zh:醇釀公司) says 5 employees and founded in 2018
Zaccarias (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep well it's used and has an article on zh.wp so it's notable until we delete that article. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --JuTa 17:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is a duplicate of File:30 Avenue renovated vc.jpg. epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 00:39, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:36 Avenue renovated vc.jpg epicgenius (talk) 14:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 00:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, It wasn't my upload. I cropped it for better infobox usage. Cheers !!! Md.altaf.rahman (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 08:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
personal rights of Evi Kurz were violated Overtaked (talk) 12:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Why?Nun, verglichen mit anderen im Web verfügbaren (meist unfreien) Fotos wirkt dieses hier in der Tat besonders unvorteilhaft. --Túrelio (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)- Für mich unverständliche Perspektivänderung von "Why?" nach "klar doch". Abgesehen davon: Soll ich das so verstehen, dass ich das Foto negativ verändert hätte, dass es nicht genau so vor Ort aussah? --Onkel Theodor (talk) 20:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Onkel Theodor: aus dem Nominierungsargument ging nicht hervor, warum die Persönlichkeitsrechte der Abgebildeten verletzt würden, weshalb ich danach gefragt hatte. Als ich mir später aber auf Google-Images andere, auch aktuelle Fotos der Abgebildeten angeschaut habe, wirkte das nominierte Foto auf mich - im Vergleich mit anderen - merklich unvorteilhaft. Deine schlechtwillige Spekulation im 2. Satz kannst du dir sparen. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry für letzteres. --Onkel Theodor (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Naja, da misst sie aber mit unterschiedlichem Maß .... auf der verlinkten Fotostrecke der Lokalzeitung sieht sie genau so und nicht anders aus. --Superikonoskop (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Onkel Theodor: aus dem Nominierungsargument ging nicht hervor, warum die Persönlichkeitsrechte der Abgebildeten verletzt würden, weshalb ich danach gefragt hatte. Als ich mir später aber auf Google-Images andere, auch aktuelle Fotos der Abgebildeten angeschaut habe, wirkte das nominierte Foto auf mich - im Vergleich mit anderen - merklich unvorteilhaft. Deine schlechtwillige Spekulation im 2. Satz kannst du dir sparen. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Für mich unverständliche Perspektivänderung von "Why?" nach "klar doch". Abgesehen davon: Soll ich das so verstehen, dass ich das Foto negativ verändert hätte, dass es nicht genau so vor Ort aussah? --Onkel Theodor (talk) 20:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- WARUM? --Onkel Theodor (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)--Onkel Theodor (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Warum? --Superikonoskop (talk) 07:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Appears to me to be in public space, unless it was somehow taken in a back yard or something like that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:36, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, as the subject feels to be pictured unfavourably and as another freely-licensed image of the subject is available on Commons.
Rationale: Depicted person is not a mayor public figure and thereby retains more of the rather strong personality rights in German jurisdiction (de: Recht am eigenen Bild (Deutschland)). This deletion is just a courtesy towards the depicted person, not a judgement about the nominator-alleged violation of personality rights.
Begründung: Frau Kurz ist nur eine relative Person der Zeitgeschichte und hat damit ein höheres Recht am eigenen Bild als eine absolute PdZ. Hinzu kommt, dass eine Biographie auf :de etwas anderes ist als vorübergehende Presseberichte. Deshalb ist hier Fingerspitzengefühl geboten, siehe die Diskussion auf WP:UF. --Túrelio (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
The file appears to be a non-free reproduction from https://www.redlightmanagement.com/artists/bobby-bones/bobby-final-suitw/ copyrights owned by Red Light Management as so declared on given link. John Cline (talk) 07:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:32, 11 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.redlightmanagement.com/artists/bobby-bones/bobby-final-suitw/ --Krdbot 18:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The cup is copyrighted. Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Per previous DR: (1): (2) - Derivative works of modern 3D sculpture that are copyrighted by FIFA. The FIFA WC trophy was designed in 1974 by Italian artist Silvio Gazzaniga, who is still alive.
- For the same reason, File:FIFA - replica world cup trophy.JPG should be deleted as well. Fma12 (talk) 12:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Administration of the President of Russia Vladimir Putin states that they have all necessary rights for this image, and that they have released this image with the free license. We know that this modern 3D sculpture was copyrighted by FIFA. It means that Administration of the President of Russia Vladimir Putin has already subscribed a contract with FIFA and has already received all the permissions that are needed for free license. We cannot doubt the license from Administration of the President. So we have to keep this image because of its legal and high-grade license. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:09, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment, We, the community at Wikimedia Commons, can most definitely doubt any group or organisation. Administration of the President of Russia currently has very little trustworthiness internationally or locally. However, it is possible that this time they are trying to honestly follow international laws. We need to remember that it is possible that the cup itself is still copyrighted by FIFA and that Administration of the President of Russia has received a transferable licence to distribute and alter photographs of it that were taken at specific events. We do not need to demand something extreme, like the proof that the cup is in public domain, only that the photo can be freely licenced. This can be easily resolved via COM:OTRS. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 21:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Any person may claim to be a representative of any government and to say he is the copyright holder of an image, but there are rules to follow here. To clear doubts, an OTRS ticket would be needed. On the other hand, the image sould be deleted because of the reasons explained above. - Fma12 (talk) 11:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - moreover the only ones who can send a valid permission are the holders of the copyright, the FIFA, the permissions from third persons, government or not, are not acceptable. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
web-quality, unlikely to be own work Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
web-quality, unlikely to be own work Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The photo is obviously not own work, as it was taken in 1924. It's too recent to be public domain. Diannaa (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
This photo was provided to me by a company representative with their express consent to share it for use in the public domain. What information or documentation do I need to provide to have it approved?Steve the mos(talk) 14:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license or by having the copyright holder send a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. There's full instructions at Commons:OTRS. Diannaa (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Magazine advert, unlikely to be own work as stated. Diannaa (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
This photo was provided to me by a company representative with their express consent to share it for use in the public domain. What information or documentation do I need to provide to have it approved?Steve the mos(talk) 14:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license or by having the copyright holder send a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. There's full instructions at Commons:OTRS. Diannaa (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Photo is unlikely to be own work as stated, as it was taken in 1958. Diannaa (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
This photo was provided to me by a company representative with their express consent to share it for use in the public domain. What information or documentation do I need to provide to have it approved?Steve the mos(talk) 14:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license or by having the copyright holder send a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. There's full instructions at Commons:OTRS. Diannaa (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
unlikely own work, looks like scanned book figure. 95.84.163.244 18:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment If it is deleted, this needs to go as well (as a COM:DW). That is sad, but unavoidable. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:09, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader provides no publication history to prove that formalities were not followed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader hasn't provided sufficient proof that the original author is unknown. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader provides no proof of license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Please remove, cannot remember the source Sg829100 (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Don't know the source of this image, can't remember the source.
- Hmm, 7.5 years after you uploaded this image, you suddenly remember that it's not yours? Are you aware that quite a number of website-owners have relied[4] on the free license, under which you had released this iamge? --Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Neutral This looks very strange, one upload in 2010 and then only now the desire to have the file deleted, overwritten, or otherwise destroyed. It is possible that the person has made a mistake and uploaded a copyrighted image, although I cannot see why somebody would behave in such a way. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - according to the uploader, this is not an own work - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that this was published without a copyright notice. This less tightly cropped version seems to have some kind of inscription in the lower right-hand corner. The source site, Alchetron, just grabs photos from various online sources and provides nothing but deep links as sources – in this case, apparently a deleted file from eBay. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:00, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright!!! This is a photo of me, Prof. Dr. Ahmad Osman. I want it to be deleted from wikimedia. Thank you for your help. Best regards, Ahmad Osman أ.عثمان (talk) 20:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Quick uploader request. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Автор - Христина Стебельська, Віктор Феськів? Small size, no metadata. Unknown copyright situation. Most probably the uploader is not the author.
And also other uploaded.
Микола Василечко (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Picture of a page in an Israeli newspaper. Clearly, a copyrights violation that has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 20:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Didn't realize the huge crack down the middle of the pic. No idea how that happened TenPoundHammer (talk) 20:46, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request on the same day. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1948, depicted person died in 1985. Jcb (talk) 20:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
File:MV5BZmNlODU5M2UtNmViMC00M2QwLWI3NzMtYzhjMTIwYTIxODNiXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjkxNzQ1NDI@. V1 UY1200 CR9006301200 AL .jpg
[edit]
All over the web; uploader has history of uploading things found on the web as own-work DMacks (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
And likewise:
DMacks (talk) 21:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There's no proof that the uploader holds the rights. Besides, the user has been uploading a series of copyright violations. —Vensatry (Ping me) 19:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1993. Sculptor V. Kupetskyі. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 21:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:51, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, false own work claim. Jcb (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Support --Микола Василечко (talk) 04:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:50, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DebSheppard (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dawn Seymour, missing permission.
- File:Deb Sheppard 02.jpg
- File:Deb Sheppard 01.jpg
- File:Deb Sheppard 03.jpg
- File:Deb Sheppard Psychic Medium Author and Speaker.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the uploader can't be at the same time the subject D;Sheppard and the photographer D.Seymour. The situation have to be clarified via OTRS + maybe a scope issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:49, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Шевалье де Бульон (talk · contribs)
[edit]no license at source
- File:АК-12 и АК-15.jpg
- File:Снайперская винтовка Драгунова модернизированная (СВДМ).jpg
- File:ПП 19-01 «Витязь-СН».jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permissions. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused crop, accidentally saved Jay D'Easy (talk) 22:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep it's in use on several wikis... Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per Magog the Ogre. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Listed as copyrighted with owner as Bill Wadman. No clear evidence of permission, OTRS needed. Hiàn (talk) 23:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution unidentifiable photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope as it is now. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Henri Lecomte.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded thi duplicate of #2 Wiki name (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Amaryllis -- Hippeastrum correiense 2.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
wrong image Diepniit.nguyenhong (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: photo of photo, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: the file is used and can not be deleted without a copyright issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
The document contains the text of a page in the website of the Cathedral of the Transfiguration (www.cathedralofthetransfiguration.com). The copyright holder of the website has granted a copyright waiver, so the text in the subject document is therefore free for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere. The claim that the document has "questionable notability" is clearly invalid. The Cathedral of the Transfiguration is known throughout the world. Its cornerstone and altar were blessed by Pope John Paul II (the first time a pope had blessed a North American house of worship), it has been featured in movies and it was visited by the president of what was then Czechoslovakia. The mosaics in the cathedral are notable, not only for their beauty, but also for their unique Canadian contentUser talk:EzwiderEzwider (talk) 17:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Plik jest niepotrzebny i nie będzie wykorzystywany do innych projektów. TuRyba (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Author’s permission required: author mentioned in metadata of the shot. 95.84.163.244 14:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, available on line. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria teresa macià costa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical newspaper and documents. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:ATCHER FANER JOAQUIM LVG19270205-002.pdf
- File:XAMAR PUIGVENTOS 1888 IMATGE 1711 R C B.jpg
- File:Record-image 939Z-5N5C-Q(1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted movie poster
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's an error, I meant copyvio speedy deletion. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused map of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Flag of Quillacollo.png
- File:Bandera De Colcapirhua.png
- File:Escudo De Colcapirhua.jpg
- File:Colcapirhua bander.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:30, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
i disagree with marking as {{PD-Textlogo}}. Please review file licence. WTM (talk) 15:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
copy of already present image Impatientartist (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no image to delete. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is from [5] and no reason to believe that the commons user is the original author. Moments after uploading it, the Commons uploader tried to have it deleted as a duplicate, but the request was malformed. It does not appear to be a duplicate, so presumably its duplicate was deleted as a copyright violation. B (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging @Christian Ferrer: who handled the original request. Note that the filename was linked incorrectly above and so you didn't see the image in question. --B (talk) 14:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral There version of Commons is older than the one in imdb (and also older than the others available in the WEB), and is with full resolution + EXIFs. It may perhaps be considered as an "own work". Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, I couldn't find a date on the imdb one so I didn't see that. But I'm still concerned that a user with no other substantive edits uploaded this image and then 11 minutes later tried to have it deleted. I don't know that we can reasonably accept that this license is valid unless the uploader responds with further information. --B (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted. Uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
The photo was taken and uploaded without the artists' consent. The uploader was contacted via the Talk page and kindly asked to delete the file.but refused to do so.We then contacted Wikipedia and were advised to request the courtesy deletion of the photo via this link. Cocolinmichela (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:CSCR#United Kingdom. The photo was taken (without flash) during a public performance and there were no restrictions on taking such photographs. For what it's worth, an announcement was made before the performance that taking videos and flash photography was not allowed. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep If it was felt that the subject's permission was required for photographs to appear in WP, what next? Perhaps the subject would feel entitled to say what details might or might not appear in their biography too. The photo is not unflattering, and adds to the article, while no motivation at all has been given for the subject's objection. Imaginatorium (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- The subject's motivation appears to be "we didn't want to be photographed during the performance, so there was an announcement beforehand that photography was forbidden during the performance". The argument is, does 'no flash photography during the performance' explicitly mean 'all other forms for photography are permissible'? Was the venue mistaken in how they formulated the restriction? And if so — given the subject's evident distress — should we hold them to it? DS (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Rather/weak Delete Small and poor quality image. The subject may be asked to provide a better image? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:49, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's difficult to fathom the motives of the nominator, who is not the subject but somewhat associated, when she replaced the nominated image with a similar one, which in my opinion is of poorer quality. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- The subject seems to be Vstrad7, cf. [6]. But I agree that the other image is not better, rather worse. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's difficult to fathom the motives of the nominator, who is not the subject but somewhat associated, when she replaced the nominated image with a similar one, which in my opinion is of poorer quality. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Jiaxin_Cheng_and_Julian_Lloyd_Webber.jpg&diff=306970100&oldid=305167847){kind=link}
Kept: if anyone thinks that some privacy rights are being violated, then they have to make their own request via OTRS, with an email address that we can identify as their own. Any other anonymous request can not reasonably be taken into account. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:28, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio from Historia (magasine) : the photo is © Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - the photo have been pubkished in a french magazine, therefore french copyright applies. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete spam and this user has given a final warning. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
no license Nickel nitride (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Les Fleurs Du Mal, Inauguration of the first exhibition of Marilyn Manson in Europe, Galerie Brigitte Schenk, Cologne, June 2007.jpg
[edit]
contemporary artworks Martin Sg. (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative work. --Majora (talk) 04:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Flickr description says "Photo By Matthew Blank" - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete at least if no COM:OTRS will change the situation. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 16:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The image came from Google Earth PePeEfe (talk) 07:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio. --Majora (talk) 16:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The logo might be above Commons:TOO. The eagle's head is not a "simple geometric shape". kyykaarme (talk) 07:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Logo above TOO. --Majora (talk) 16:47, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://wina-gent.be/ Wikiwerner (talk) 09:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Logo above TOO. --Majora (talk) 16:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Last remaining file, this looks like a picture of a picture, no evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 10:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Very low resolution, lack of Exif data – unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 10:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Life magazine copyrighted and watermarked image. Low resolution from this photo André Koehne TALK TO ME 12:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
"released for nonprofit and fair use" - 1. said who? 2. if this would be true, it still would not fit our Commons rules. An image under these conditions would not be free. Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:55, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Improper license statement. --Majora (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: Ticket:2019030810002166 --Majora (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- The picture have been provided by the subject of the wiki, Cécile Brosseau. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom kurita (talk • contribs) 13:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Tom kurita: Facebook images are not free of use. A permission from the photographer is to be sent via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Ticket:2018062410001669 has been received. However, it is in French and is not complete. I have moved it to the French queue where it awaits further processing. --Majora (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission confirmed. --Majora (talk) 16:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hopelessly blurred to the point of being totally unusable. GMGtalk 13:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No objections, Delete. Hiàn (talk) 14:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Dia Azzawi (b. 1939). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The artist (and author of the image) appears to have supplied a copy of this work to the online repository, Modern Art Archive which has supplied all its images under Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share-Alike 3.0 license (as specified at the time of uploading). According to the website's details for the image in question, the work was part of approximately 8,000 artworks that were looted from the collection of the Iraqi Museum of Modern Art in 2003, following the US invasion. The work appeared in a book, Listed in the Red: A Partial List of the Artworks Missing from the National Museum of Modern Art, Baghdad-Iraq, published by the Iraqi Ministry of Culture in 2010.
- The website, Modern Art Archive, where this image appears claims that it is a "participatory content-management system to trace, share and enable community enrichment around this art." BronHiggs (talk) 22:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Invalid license. Non-commercial is not acceptable here. Please see COM:L. --Majora (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Infringement of copyright. This picture has been published. It doesn't look like being worked by Thomas Wang0127 and shared in CC BY-SA 4.0. - I am Davidzdh. 04:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keepThe file looks old enough, and a PD is probably appliciable? Anyways, more information about the date of publish is needed.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The fact that the user claimed 'own work' makes me question that there was a care given to whether or not it is copyrighted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We would need a lot more information to keep this. As it stands this is a PCP delete. --Majora (talk) 03:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
It's obviously not a Thomas Wang0127's work and shared in CC BY-SA 4.0. And there has been a better version. So I don't think this file is necessary to leave. - I am Davidzdh. 04:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral The file can be 'own work' but in either case it is way too simple to warrant copyright. I do agree that SVG already exists and was here before this JPEG was uploaded. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
We don't know when this photo has been taken. And it has been published before uploaded here. So it doesn't look like a uploader's work which shared in CC BY-SA 4.0. - I am Davidzdh. 05:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Numerous issues with this uploader makes me wary of the copyright status of this image. We would need more information to keep it. --Majora (talk) 03:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Out of COM:SCOPE, https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_%CE%A7%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%82_%CE%9A%CE%BF%CE%BC%CE%BD%CE%B7%CE%BD%CF%8C%CF%82
Not necessarily copyvio, but out of scope, promotional content. If this is in scope, we will need evidence of permission from the photographer. Guanaco (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope as it stands. No evidence of permission. --Majora (talk) 03:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahsia junk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Selangor state legislative assembly.svg
- File:Johor state legislative assembly.svg
- File:Sabah state legislative assembly.svg
- File:Sarawak State Legislative Assembly.svg
- File:Parliament Of Malaysia.svg
- File:Dewan Rakyat.svg
- File:Dewan Negara Parlimen Malaysia.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Incorrect choice of license used by the uploader. Based on thorough check on each of the State Legislative Assembly (DUN) website, those have been established since 1963 while several other DUN like Selangor are more older since 1800s. This subsequently qualify under the {{PD-Malaysia}} license with the uploader supposedly use the license rather than using the own work license although he/she vectorise the logos. The parliament also same as through its history, it has been introduced since the last days of British colonial rule. Molecule Extraction (talk) 13:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, same as about, the tagging is wrong.*angys* (talk) 06:57, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep then add the proper license tag will solve the problem. No valid deletion reason given by nom.--Cohaf (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Licensing fixed. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 03:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MSClaudiu as Speedy (speedy-delete) and the most recent rationale was: logo of Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași Yann (talk) 09:46, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- This is a coat of arms, and according to the traditions of heraldry, the definitive description is the textual blazon. Anyone can make a new artistic rendering of the coat of arms based on the textual blazon, and will own the copyright to their own rendering... AnonMoos (talk) 04:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- This is the en:logo of the university.--MSClaudiu (talk) 17:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's a en:coat of arms, and the rules for heraldry are a little different from those for logos... AnonMoos (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's a logo en:File:Harvard shield wreath.svg.--MSClaudiu (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- You can keep on repeating that until you turn blue in the face, but that will do nothing to change the fact that heraldry is a thing of its own, and the rules governing heraldic "achievements" are a little different from those governing generic corporate logos... AnonMoos (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You didn't take a textual blazon and make it your own. You took it directly from their website. The copyright would belong to whoever made that, not the uploader. --Majora (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ChoHyeri as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Selca, hardly belonging to the uploader Guanaco (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No metadata, other copyvios in uploaders history, highly unlikely this is properly licensed. --Majora (talk) 02:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Harryboyles as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/maireadnesbittcelticviolinist Not the source. HR with EXIF, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 09:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Image existed for over a decade online before it was uploaded here. HR with EXIF or not there is zero evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder here and the metadata could have come from any of those other sites that don't strip it out. --Majora (talk) 04:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot copyrighted iPhone app as discussed at [hxxps://www.cultofmac.com/5719/beatmaker-and-istylophone-are-this-weeks-best-things-ever/]
However we should consider COM:Design as comment when removing the earlier permission tag. May be copyvio if photo has a claim of copyright and is more than a faithful reproduction. Fæ (talk) 20:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Fæ, it is not entirely a photo, so your argument is invalid, no need for DR.--BevinKacon (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't see how this could possibly be considered a simple utilitarian object since the image was created specifically to represent the iPhone app iStylophone. It is assumed that this would be part of their copyright so we can't keep it here. --Majora (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Same situation as in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Logo_PSOE_1976-2001.svg: Unfree logo. License used is not correct, as the image does not consist just of "simple geometric shapes or text" (the fist and the rose meeting the threshold of originality). Sfs90 (talk) 23:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- And same arguments in order to oppose deletion as they are both derivative versions of a file which is compliant with Commons. --Fer1997 (talk)
- Even when you created the file as a "derivative work", the fist-and-rose logo in Spain is copyrighted by PSOE, and the same case applies with the PSC that you are posting. --Sfs90 (talk) 01:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Legally speaking, those are trademarks, and there is a
- Even when you created the file as a "derivative work", the fist-and-rose logo in Spain is copyrighted by PSOE, and the same case applies with the PSC that you are posting. --Sfs90 (talk) 01:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
|
This work includes material that may be protected as a trademark in some jurisdictions. If you want to use it, you have to ensure that you have the legal right to do so and that you do not infringe any trademark rights. See our general disclaimer. This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing. |
- After looking at it for the second time I have realised that the part that falls under COM:TOO is actually taken from the public domain image, so the rest is nothing but simple geometric shapes (series of stripes). Therefore I reverse my previous vote and now believe we should Keep. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 05:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- After looking at it for the second time I have realised that the part that falls under COM:TOO is actually taken from the public domain image, so the rest is nothing but simple geometric shapes (series of stripes). Therefore I reverse my previous vote and now believe we should
- Delete Copyrights laws in Spain (and the EU) are clear about the protection of logos, trademarks and any work created by an author. There's nothing more to say about it, and the logo should not continue on Commons, since is a trademarked logo, with rights belonging to their respective authors ("the author" being the creator of the logo, not the creator of a copycat uploaded to Commons, which seems to be the case). --Sfs90 (talk) 23:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Trademarks mean absolutely nothing to us as they are a non-copyright restriction. What matters is copyright which is a completely different section of law. If the rose itself, which is the only part of that image that meets TOO, was in the public domain than this would be a derivative of something that is PD. Which would make it fine to be here. That is the entire point of the public domain. For things to be available to be redone and rethought into new creations. --Majora (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Artists still alive, missing permission.
- File:Suad-al-atar-4.jpg
- File:Suad-al-atar-3.jpg
- File:Suad-al-attar--2.jpg
- File:Soad-al-attar titlr ukn-1.jpg
- File:Dia-azzawo-martyrs-1972.jpg
- File:Dia azzawi-the lost city-1970.jpg
- File:Dia azzawi-title unknown-1.jpg
- File:Ismail-fattah sculpture 1.jpg
- File:Hanaa-malallah-2.jpg
- File:Hanaa-malallah-1.jpg
- File:Faiq-hassan-title not known 6.jpg
- File:Faiq-hassan--title unknown 6.jpg
- File:Faiq-hassan--title unknown 5.jpg
- File:Faiq-hassan--charcoal.jpg
- File:Faiq-hassan-title not known 4.jpg
- File:Faiq-hassan--title unknown 3.jpg
- File:Faiq-hassan title unknown- 1.jpg
- File:Naziha-salim-untitled 3.jpg
- File:Naziha-salim-untitled 2.jpg
- File:Naziha-selm.jpg
- File:Madiha-omar-untitled 3.jpg
- File:Madiha-omar-untitled 2.jpg
- File:Madiha-omar title unknown 1.jpg
- File:Abdul-qader-al-rassam--title unknown.jpg Seems OK (It is another kind of work, and 50 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author--Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC));
- File:Abdul-qader-al-rassam-baghdad flooding.jpg Seems OK (It is another kind of work, and 50 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author--Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)).
- File:Shakir-hassan-al-said--untitled 4.jpg
- File:Shakir-hassan-al-said--untitled 3.jpg
- File:Shakir-hassan-al-said--23 202f0ff9bc.jpg
- File:Shakir-hassan-al-said-untitled 1.jpg
- File:Khalid-al-rahal-untitled-mia.jpg
- File:Khalid-al-rahal--untitled 3-artiraq.jpg
- File:Khalid-al-rahal-untitled 2-artiraq.jpg
- File:Khalid-al-rahal-Untitled 1-art-iraq.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- There seems to be some sort of error in listing some of these items. A number of these artists are clearly not "still alive" and their details were provided at the time of uploading the relevant images:
- Khalid al-Rahal (1926-1987) - no current wikipedia article, but one in progress and about to be submitted for publication
- Shakir Hassan Al Said (1925-2004)
- Madiha Omar (1908-2005)
- Naziha Salim (1927-2008)
- Faeq Hassan or Faiq Hasssan (1914-1992)
- Ismail Fatah Al Turk or Ismail Fattah (1934-2004)
- Abdul Qadir Al Rassam (1882-1952) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BronHiggs (talk • contribs) 23:12, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
All of the works were made available on the website, Modern Art Iraq Archive (https://artiraq.org/maia/about) which uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share-Alike 3.0 license in order to "maximise exposure" of the works. The works, in question, were part of about 8,500 artworks that were looted from the Iraq Museum of Modern Art in 2003 when the US invaded the the country. These works are still missing, and presumed lost. BronHiggs (talk) 23:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- @BronHiggs: I don't know how is issued such a CC license by the MAIA site but it appears it's by default ("The MAIA project and project team takes copyright and other intellectual property laws seriously. If you are the copyright owner of an image, document, or other work in MAIA, please contact and notify us. Once notified, we will take down works that may infringe copyright.") This statement is not sufficient for Commons since we need the permissions from each painter (or their heirs if deceased). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- These are very rare images of artworks that have been looted or destroyed and are now presumed lost. The website, Modern Art Iraq Archive (https://artiraq.org/maia/about), where they appear, is a participatory project, begun by a group of Iraqi artists, led by the artist Dia Azzawi, which enables members of the public to upload images that they may have in their possession, and who are clearly advised of the CC license at the time of uploading. Many of the images have been scanned from postcards that were once available for sale at the Iraqi Museum of Modern Art or scanned from the book, Iraqi Artwork Red List: A Partial List of the Artworks Missing from the National Museum of Modern Art edited by Salam Atta Sabri an Mehmed Ali under the auspices of the Iraq Ministry of Culture. It might be worth mentioning that this book about missing artworks is used by Interpol and gallery owners to help identify stolen artworks, so that these images are widely circulated in various public domain sites. Perhaps these works could be accepted under some type of fair use provision? Given that these artworks have been lost are unlikely to be recovered, images of them are exceedingly rare, yet they form an important part of Iraq's modern art history, and as such would be a valuable addition to Wiki Commons Gallery. BronHiggs (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: most of them. Copyright lasts for decades after the death of the owner. Please see the relevant country section at COM:CRT for details on copyright expiration dates. Kept: two of them where the author died over 50 years ago and it is now PD-Iraq. --Majora (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Mixed close. One was found to be PD, the other was a collage. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
subi la foto por error 181.167.1.53 14:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: F10 --Majora (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no source (No source since).
Since this is not a "new" upload, but a move from enwp where it was uploaded in 2014, I believe a full COM:DR is needed, rather than a delayed-speedy deletion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This was uploaded at Wikipedia in 2014 and had been sitting there without complaints about the licence until recently when it was transferred to Commons. Although the original Flickr page seems to be lost, I think the time at WP is sufficient evidence for the validity of the free licence. See also page 41 of this document that quotes the original Flickr url as "shared under Creative Commons agreement". Other images by the same Flickr user were bot uploaded as CC-by-2.0 so I don't see why this image should not have been issued under a free licence. De728631 (talk) 16:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @De728631: Though I couldn't find this exact image on archive.org, I found [7], which, from the image ID and title "VMC Olympic Weekend ..." is the same event (it was taken the day before - on February 14, 2010), and this image is marked CC-BY-2.0. So I think we can reasonably accept that this license is correct. It is worth noting, though, from this archive.org link we can see that this Flickr user also uploaded images that were marked "No rights reserved" or here is one marked non-commercial / no derivatives. But the fact that they uploaded a CC-BY-2.0 image the day before the one in question, to me, says we can reasonably accept this one. --B (talk) 13:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - a file from Flickr with a failed review is a 'delete'. Despite two keep votes with speculations, keeping the file would be unprecedented. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
