Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 1st, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|mistaken upload}} Lianghuei (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied, per nomination by uploader on day of upload, unused. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload, new user trying out uploading but not having the correct legal information Nextjr (talk) 03:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:36, 1 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC-by 4.0 permissions on the original source. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 06:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. From https://www.mmtimes.com/news/wwf-myanmar-sounds-alarm-about-illegal-wildlife-trade.html 70.26.63.167 11:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:17, 1 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: taken from https://www.mmtimes.com/news/wwf-myanmar-sounds-alarm-about-illegal-wildlife-trade.html --Krdbot 19:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake uploading it here. Danielpc2010 (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wdwd at 16:06, 1 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file --Krdbot 19:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The deer and elephant artwork at the top is 2D, not allowed per COM:FOP#India. No source or license infomation.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:30, 2 Februar 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Victoria Poster.jpg --Krdbot 07:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 11:08, 2 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.ghgroupuk.com/about-george-houghton/ --Krdbot 13:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been taken from https://www.sparksunderland.com/ and the uploader is the radio stations manager and is trying to promote their station as much as possible, The image isn't in use either, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 14:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate use of TP. E4024 (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Contains detailed biography only. --Achim (talk) 13:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haha1979 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

artefacts about porn, out of com:Scope

Pippobuono (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Haha1979 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personally I fail to see how these images lie within the scope of our project. I'm at a loss to image what project that might reasonably be used on. Thanks

Herby talk thyme 11:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted:  speedily deleted as near-certain copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality image of unspecified bird, numerous better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   20:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified bird? In the file name and description it is written that it is a waxwing. We have the only photo of the waxwing in the nest.  Keep--Insider (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   14:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos, not used.

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 19:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, just delete these photos. I do not want them on here any more. Otherwise I'll start posting the ones you don't like again with criticisms of this site (only 80% accurate) Markheffron2 (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I was neutral before, but that kind of threat makes me feel that a courtesy deletion would be excessively courteous. --bjh21 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Come on people, delete my files! I want them gone. <censored>. Markheffron2 (talk) 00:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Homeboy1197 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal, unused photos; failing COM:EDUSE

Ruthven (msg) 21:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Homeboy1197 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope; personal image/selfie theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photos and selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal Webhost Afifa Afrin (talk) 04:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value - Out of scope Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused apparent personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joaolazaro9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos an selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhony Padilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moritz Wagner der 1. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos, mostly selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uvksborofficiel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:KristenWillard

[edit]

Unused promotional and mostly watermarked images of no possible educational use. About half were formerly in w:User:KristenWillard/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 02:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, unused, and defaced by a watermark. (The copyright release is credible enough that OTRS doesn't seem worth bothering with, though.) Formerly in w:User:CJ Rider/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 02:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-portrait of an artist without an article, and too small for any other conceivable educational use. Formerly in w:User:CJ Rider/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Cropped from this image, located at this location. The image is clearly a screenshot of a television broadcast. Rights to the image very likely belong to the television broadcaster Bharti Airtel, whose watermarks appears in the upper left of the source image, and not the uploader, even if he is the subject of the image. At a minimum, we would need a release statement from the broadcaster indicating a transfer of rights to the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope again; created by a sock of Suman Kumar Mallick theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Once again recreated, and still a copyright violation. Created by yet another sock of Suman Kumar Mallick. Of note; no point in salting this against creation; the sockpuppet here has a long history of creating alternate names of himself, and will very likely just create an alternat filename if this one is salted. Hammersoft (talk) 18:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G4. --Majora (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/broken image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image. 125.227.40.133 05:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image. 125.227.40.133 05:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 07:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr.kanha garg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal type images, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sainath tumma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the scope Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vovakazakov343 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no forseeable educational use, and out of focus. Formerly in w:Draft:Kiruba Foundation. —Cryptic (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as an unused personal photo. Formerly in w:Draft:Kiruba Foundation. —Cryptic (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as an unused personal photo. Formerly in w:Draft:Kiruba Foundation. —Cryptic (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably no educational value. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renato Luan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trawiarz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Niazgeopk

[edit]

Unused private images. No useful contributions by user. --DavidIvar (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo Apocheir (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-promotional image Apocheir (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of unknown person. Not used. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, probable self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright of artwork SecretName101 (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - it is Commons policy to completely ignore non-copyright restrictions of this sort -- see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Museum_and_interior_photography. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Located here, the link is on this page (click on "female"), and there is copyright information on the page (in detail here) allowing "personal and/or educational use" and other uses via a "fair-use agreement". This is not compatible with Commons licenses and it is not the CC license placed on it by the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From this website, which does not have any licensing information at all. Just need to confirm where the CC-BY-4.0 license came from or that the uploader has permission to use the file. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mojtaba rks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and selfie.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo, low quality, copyright status highly uncertain since this looks like a screenshot. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a copyright violation. TV screen grab and claimed as own work.  samee  01:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See the © logo, UNISYS images are copyrighted. B dash (talk) 01:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. See COM:FOP#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. See COM:FOP#Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. See COM:FOP#Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Anonyme" is not a name of photograph - all photos published in reviews in 1970 in France are not DP. Licence abusive Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

couverture de la revue http://www.chire.fr/A-169810-n-161-162-juil-aout-1990-in-memoriam-pierre-pascal.aspx --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake author (it's not "none") ; impossible to say who is the illistrator who signed the picture, impossible without the name to say that the illustrator is DP. (the contibutor is specialised in fake information about pictures) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by শক্তিশেল (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Permission, no meta data

Afifa Afrin (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the source and the source is open source so I hope I'm free to use. Moreover this pictures are basically very needy pictures, as they are wealth of our earth. And folk cultures are being lost every day. To keep their existence there is a only one way, that is photo. So they are too valuable. It is my request keep these photo, and ofcourse these are taken from open source.

Thanks শক্তিশেল (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: For most of these, there are two copyrights -- one for the image and the other for the work of art shown. In some cases where there are more than one work of art, there are even more copyrights. I see no evidence that there are free licenses for any of the images or any of the art. Please note that in order for an image you find on the Web to be free for Commons, it must have an explicit free license. If there is no license, then the work is not free. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Front page of a 1994 London newpaper is protected by copyright laws. DGtal (talk) 07:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image represents a personal attack on a living person and has no constructive value to the Commons. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any image that depicts anyone as Hitler (other than Hitler himself) does not belong.--64.229.165.48 22:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be own work, available at http://www.histarmar.com.ar/SubArch/CARLOSPVAIRO/Vairo-Governoren/Governoren.htm in higher resolution 4ing (talk) 08:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: The author of the file: GovernorenSvend Foyn 2003.jpg is Carlos Pedro Vairo and he has assigned the rights for this publication to Commons and to the Fundación Histarmar. If you need a better resolution of the photo, o cualquier otra prueba I can send it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jib06 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 1 February 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Carlos Pedro Vairo must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

motivi di privacy Irokraft (talk) 08:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For privacy purpose Irokraft (talk) 08:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blank page -- no image there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This and many other files have been deleted in the past as copyvios, but they keep getting reuploaded. —SpacemanSpiff 09:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SteveDorf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader has been spamming/advertising on en.wiki and here. Many uploads have been deleted as copyvios or for lack of proper license but he keeps uploading them again and again

SpacemanSpiff 09:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hantish mhugo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Not used on a valid user page - user page currently just consists of this photo Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, formerly in w:Draft:Deepak Kalal. —Cryptic (talk) 02:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sevisofgod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal type images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a fake user Photo Kobitasaha365 (talk) 15:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a fake user Photo Kobitasaha365 (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liuqiuwangguo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no camera info in EXIF, unlikely own work

Wcam (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ady46924 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Also out of Commons:Project scope.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 05:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnnysilas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jimmy Tremblay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material Mindmatrix 16:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material Mindmatrix 16:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material Mindmatrix 16:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Not used. No other useful contributions by user. DavidIvar (talk) 17:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotional Apocheir (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erlandhino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jairam Beeram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional material Mindmatrix 18:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image. Self-promotion. No other contributions by user. DavidIvar (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image uploaded for use in a promotional page on EN Wikipedia. Out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small size. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal and text-only image Apocheir (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image Apocheir (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Brianna Haley (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acordeoneroadv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Copyrightinternational (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Brianna Haley (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grupo BalacoBaco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion and personal images

Apocheir (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Intrstd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused Self-promotional and personal images

Apocheir (talk) 21:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonu Aqeel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused band promo photo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorized screenshot of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HVFundacion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Brianna Haley (talk) 22:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Original copyrighted by ISRO, but this particular image seems to be a derivative as the size does not match with the original. Gazoth (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundered copyright violation 174.89.217.31 04:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful claim of "own work" and certainly not date claimed. Image available at least at [1] from at least Nov 2017 Begoon 09:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistaken upload Lianghuei (talk) 09:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistaken upload Lianghuei (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistaken upload Lianghuei (talk) 09:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhattaraimadhav.nepal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used and doesn't seem to be in scope. E4024 (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}}. Non-free image grabbed from Google with false licensing claims. LX (talk, contribs) 23:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Content on http://www.thebrunettediaries.com is copyrighted ; no evidence that copyright has been released. See also previous copyvios: File:Barkha-sharma.jpg from same uploader, & numerous others used on same enwiki page. David Biddulph (talk) 13:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. This probably could've been tagged for speedy deletion using {{Copyvio}}. EXIF data also lists the copyright holder as "© 2013 Porus Vimadalal", who seems to be an Indian fashion photographer.[2][3] So, unless the uploader is the photographer, or can clearly show this has been released under a free license by the photographer, this shouldn't be kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Ronhjones. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: No proof this is from the German Bundesarchiv. I've searched on their website and found nothing. There is no date for this photo but it probably after the 50s, it's unlikely that the photograph died before 1947.
Français : Aucune preuve que cette provient des Archives fédérales d'Allemagne. J'ai cherché sur leur site mais je n'ai rien trouvé. La photo n'est pas datée mais est probablement des années 50 au plus tôt, il est improbable que le photographe soit mort avant 1947.
VIGNERON (talk) 14:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ne me rappelais plus de celle-là. Si elle n'est pas trouvable dans les Bundesarchiv, bien sûr OK pour la suppression. Merci à Vigneron de m'avoir averti avant. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a fake user Kobitasaha365 (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France and the building is apparently modern. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edm kimil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jinairwiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion, unused

Apocheir (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuisC25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two sepia toned modern images uploaded and attached to a page which was declined by es: wiki, see [4], Commons isn't personal photo album, nor for promotional purposes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuisC25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, self-promotion / personal

Apocheir (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks of permission, + unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nia-Watchever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: Das Wasserzeichen im Bild stimmt nicht mit der Urheberangabe überein. Foreign Species (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Sylvie Charmoy, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Essam karam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of project scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 06:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio content. Present in too many copyrighted websites. Check out Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: A file is not a copyvio because it is present in too many copyrighted websites. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No probs that it is a NASA image. B dash (talk) 01:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This photo has been taken by Scott Kelly, astronaut on the International Space Station. I've fixed source and author in the file description. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google map images are copyrighted. B dash (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NASA maps are public domain, this uses a NASA generated map. Oaktree b (talk) 03:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nope, this is the map of Google Earth which is copyrighted. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Came via Facebook.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed, the image contains tracking metadata from Facebook. Its copyright status is hence unknown as the source was not provided. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake date (Gerra dead in 1979 https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinando_Gerra) ; false name of photograph (confusion contributor / author of the pictures). Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 03:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is obviously a scan and thereby unlikely to be the own work by the uploader as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The main purpose of this file is hate speech only. This is because file's description and ja:special:diff/41819696. Please see below.

この世に核兵器と韓国はいらない。

→ There is no need nuclear weapons and Korea in the world.

special:diff/68855348

この利用者は韓国及び韓国人・在日韓国人を心の底から嫌っています。

→ This user hate Korea and Korean people & Zainichi from the bottom of his/her heart.

ja:special:diff/41819696

Thanks --Garam (talk) 07:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is obviously out of COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All uploads of this occasional visitor seem to be taken from internet sites. For instance this one might have been grabbed from "ebay" online sales. E4024 (talk) 09:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All uploads by the user share the same EXIF data. I do not see a reason why we should distrust them. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single file upload by user, seems to be from a website. Could even be a "prank" from a student as profile states her name and who she is (which is unusual I think). Perhaps remove profile altogether? 2 edits only, one for profile & this upload. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This appears to be a photo of Nicola Kelly which probably was not taken by herself. It was published before (see https://twitter.com/nicolamcnee). Hence, this would require a permission coming through our support team by the photographer. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This requires permission coming through our support team, not just for the photo but also in regard to the depicted copyrighted material. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed, this needs a written permission by Andreas von Einsiedel, to be forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed, this needs a written permission by Andreas von Einsiedel, to be forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject has withdrawn donation of media, and photographer has not provided a CC release.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed, no response since more than a week now. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no own work copyright Pitpisit (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is unlikely to be the own work by the uploader. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This caligraphy is way beyond simple shapes and text. IMHO the threshold of originality ist met here: Therefore it ist not public domain. Martin K. (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This appears to be a work by Paramount Pictures, hence US copyright law applies. Per section 906.4 of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices (see pp. 537 in this PDF) typography and callygraphy are not eligible for copyright. While this text admits that some typeface ornamentation that is separable from the typeface characters may be eligible, it makes clear that

“the mere use of text effects (including chalk, popup, papercraft, neon, beer glass, spooky-fog, and weathered-and-worn), while potentially separable, is de minimis

In this case, I do not think that it goes beyond this. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scuplture in Russia by ru:Бабурин, Михаил Фёдорович (died 1984). No freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small, out of scope? Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. The uploader uploaded this image and added it to their user page in a WP. Let's see in the coming week or so if they are intending to become a real Wikipedian or are only interested in hanging the pic. E4024 (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9   16:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, taken from: kortrijk.n-va.be © 2018 N-VA Rode raaf (talk) 11:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This requires indeed a permission forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by clearer photo File:Baquetas y otros materiales.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a derivative of one or more other images but we have no idea of their origin/copyright status etc Sitush (talk) 12:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Has been published before here. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a fleuron, but part of a map. I looked it up and created a new file with the whole map File:1797 map of Fiji by James Wilson explorer.jpg, so perhaps this can be deleted? -- Deadstar (msg) 12:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC) NB I was going to overwrite, but realised I had a jpg file, not a png, and the name would then be incorrect, so decided to upload a new file.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by new upload. P 1 9 9   16:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar image exists: File:Rio Santana - panoramio.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has claimed to release the image under CC-by-SA 4.0, but the image still clearly carries a copyright disclaimer. WikiDan61 (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Used only on a user page and a draft. --E4024 (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images is released under CC-by-SA 4.0, but clearly contains a copyright claim. WikiDan61 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Those are not incompatible. Indeed, without copyright, CC licence terms would be meaningless. --bjh21 (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is so bad that the depicted individual is not identifiable; it is not even sure that it is indeed Marc Gabriel (see him there). Thus, it is unusable for any educational content. Boréal (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jgomec1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Klára Kertész's works

[edit]

The artist is Klára Kertész who died in 1997. --Regasterios (talk) 16:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phucle2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Scope? E4024 (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WWW.FUNCJESUS.ORG FUNDACIÓN CENANDO CON JESÚS INC Fue creada por el dr. wilson batista y la lcda. maribel con la finalidad de ayudar a las personas pobres que no tienen recursos, entre ellos a los envejecientes y niños pobres, que son los mas afectado en la sociedad de R.D. esta ONG nació el dia 18 de julio del año 2014 lo que mas impulso a estas personas a crear esta ONG fue el amor de JESÚS CRISTO, el autor r principal de esta ONG fue el sr. WILSON BATISTA que se arrepintió a los pies de jesus cristo el dia 1 de enero del año 2011 y Dios le puso en el corazón que ayude a los pobres, te invitamos a que visite esta pagina web y conozcan los trabajos sociales que hacen estas personas que son instrumentos de Dios.WWW.FUNCJESUS.ORG y en FACEBOOK.COM comparte y apoyarlo con un me gusta y con tus aportes para que ellos continúen llevando alegría a los pobres — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.42.238.239 (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request this to be deleted. Chingwa golgol (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on three Wikipedias, at en:Crease pattern, fr:Origami, zh:摺紙, and zh:摺紙步驟圖. It's been on Commons since 2008, so CSD G7 really doesn't apply. --bjh21 (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Bjh21. P 1 9 9   17:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JmT41 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster improperly uploaded to Commons TAnthony (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lux40 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudio Guirin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pirsharafshah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.mizanonline.ir/files/fa/news/1396/3/17/1164183_609.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pirsharafshah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal pics

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agusbaigorria1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://carwow-uk-wp-3.imgix.net/audi-a8-red-front-static.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redudant. Almost similar image exists: File:Jvma 7.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redudant. Almost similar image exists: File:Jvma 7.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too unclear to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:BBROPHOTO

[edit]

I no longer want them on Wikipedia / Wikimedia BBROPHOTO (talk) 20:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent uploads. P 1 9 9   17:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unattributed derivative work and should be deleted on this ground. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per User:Incnis Mrsi. P 1 9 9   17:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Brianna Haley (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A completely own work by the author of such masterpiece as File:Huioo.jpg, do anyone believe? This is a derivative work without attribution. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per User:Incnis Mrsi, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The object is unclear. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art, unused Apocheir (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded correct version, this signature was of a relative of his but not himself Barbudo Barbudo (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   17:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kumbamusica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TracciaViola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 21:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leghoster285 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

...leg host? Unused, self-promotional

Apocheir (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope, self-promotion. These images were uploaded to illustrate an article in es:Wikipedia. Such article, about a rock band, was deleted on repeated occasions because it was promotional (see delete log). --Gusama Romero </talk> 05:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a simple map outline. Per COM:DW: Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable.. P 1 9 9   18:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a simple map outline. Per COM:DW: Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable.. P 1 9 9   18:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative work from here. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was Trying to make Eclipse chasing Photo to look nice for the page on Wikipedia! --Out of this World Adventure (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. And ugly photoshopped image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of File:NFL Draft, Chicago 2016 (33689810976)-video.webm. Known issue with Flickr2Commons Elisfkc (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support deletion per nom.SecretName101 (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; very low quality of llamas, many better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   20:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pet photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 1

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoît Prieur: If it is not in France, what was it doing in Category:Disneyland Paris? Also, according to the GPS tag on the image, it is in France. Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say it is not in France: I said the topic and what it is represented is not concerned by the lack of FoP. --Benoît Prieur (d) 21:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunderklumpen: I would presume so, but that is a better question for someone on French Wikipedia. Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This building has been destroyed in december 2010 and it seems that «The destruction of the work extinguished copyright.» Is that correct? - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, un éventuelle suppression des fichiers est à voir au cas par cas. En effet, certains équipements photographiés ne constituent pas une œuvre de l'esprit originale, lorsqu'il s'agit par exemple de la reproduction de bateaux ou de constructions anciennes. Concernant spécifiquement File:Plaque de rue Auguste-Gusteau à EuroDisney.jpg, il n'y a aucune raison de le supprimer, il s'agit de la simple reproduction à Eurodisney des milliers de plaques de rue qui existent à Paris, il n'y a aucune création originale pour cette plaque. Concernant File:Espace Euro Disney 2008.JPG, je ne vois aucune œuvre de l'esprit du point de vue architecturale à protéger ; à moins que ce soient les droits d'auteurs sur les graffitis qui justifiraient la suppression du fichier. O.Taris (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J'ajoute que l'Espace Euro Disney a été détruit en 2010 (lire plus haut) et il semblerait que la destruction entraîne l'extinction des droits d'auteur. Cependant, dans l'exemple donné plus haut, il est question de peinture murale et non d'architecture. Merci @Benoît Prieur: d'avoir relevé cette exception. - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je reproduis ce que je viens d'écrire sur le bistro de #WpFr.
Quand le bâtiment est détruit le droit d'auteur ne semble plus s'appliquer et apparemment l'image est acceptable sur Commons :
"The destruction of the work extinguished copyright." => [6] sur un exemple équivalent File:Maison sur friche Bouchayer-Viallet.JPG).
--Benoît Prieur (d) 11:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Destruction of art never ended a copyright on the art itself ! Loreleil (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: I would rather have open a deletion request in order to facilitate a discussion and decision on such files that may be on the edge than to have them be sitting around and being used by others. Elisfkc (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 2

copyrighted site plans.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at them, File:Disneyland Resort Paris Kaart.png looks like there might be a chance that it came from Disney or somewhere else. The other two look like they were done in Paint. Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it all. The first and the third are the same pictures and they seem to be based on a road map and the real land. There is no derivative work. - Bzh-99 (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep own work, not copyrighted. Multichill (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 3

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DLRP schema.png was accidentally included. Withdrawing nomination for that image only. Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@O.Taris:
English: The topiary and the fact that there is no FOP in France. Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Français : Le topiaire et le fait qu'il n'y ait pas de FOP en France. Traduit avec Google Translate Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Si on considère que les jardins et plantation sont en général soumis au droit d'auteur, on va devoir supprimer beaucoup de photos de commons... La plantation représentée sur la photo ne me parait pas particulièrement originale pour pouvoir justifier un droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we consider that the gardens and plantation are generally subject to copyright, we will have to delete many photos of commons ... The plantation shown in the picture does not seem to me particularly original to be able to justify a copyright. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 5

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 20, 22 et 6 : je ne vois pas d'oeuvre pour laquelle le droit d'auteur serait enfreint, il s'agit de simples photos de rue ou de parking. O.Taris (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 6

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2, delete the rest. Yann (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boats with artistic designs have previously been deleted, if I remember right. Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These pictures were not deleted because of "boat of artistic design", but for the other elements of the settings. BTW in only two of them there is a boat. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 7

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, les arbres et autres plantations, les lampadaires quelconques, les bateaux ou les trains dans un paysage ne sont pas des bâtiments soumis au droit d'auteur dans le cadre de la liberté de panorama. On se demande même pourquoi une pauvre guitoune peut-être proposée à la suppression pour une question de droit d'auteur ! En revanche, le respect du droit d'auteur architectural se pose effectivement pour File:Sleeping Beauty's Castle Disneyland Paris - panoramio.jpg et File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (15).jpg. O.Taris (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per O.Taris above. Yann (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Topiaries have been found to be copyrightable in the past. I try to nominate files like these to have a precedent set for them later. I would rather nominate 50 files that are fine and have a decision made about them than to have one that is not ok left alone. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not in France, AFAIK. Your practice doesn't help admins. It pass the burden of review to them, and they are already overbooked. It would be much more useful to carefully review your nominations before making them. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Pretty sure Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris was an example of topiaries that were deleted because of copyright in France. If not, I remember having another case at some point, I'd just need to find it. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them show some copyrightable element, and IMO, File:DLP Maze View.JPG was deleted by error. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go, the example of topiaries in France being deleted that I was thinking of was Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 8

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (3).jpg et File:Disneyland - panoramio (15).jpg : les camions ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions,  Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (18).jpg, l'élément principal est la montagne et le HOLLYWOOD, qui ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions. O.Taris (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is  kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 13

Copyrighted characters

Elisfkc (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 15

No FOP in France. Moving files to correct categories, as this is too high up for most.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 16

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 17

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete all as derivative work copyright violations ({{France-cv}}). The Flickr photographers and uploaders here did not obtain permission from the architects, sculptors, graphics artists, and other authors of the copyrighted works of Euro Disney. Such permissions must be sent via COM:OTRS. French FOP doesn't suffice Commons standards because it is noncommercial, and thus doesn't adhere with COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 18

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Tube Disaster cause of non originality. Delete the others. - ~~ Bzh-99 (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted two, kept the other two per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been replaced by File:MSgt4.png. Since MSgt3.png was deleted, it makes no sense if this file is kept. - Alexis Jazz 01:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: In fairness to the file's uploader, even though they were properly notified of this discussion, their account is currently blocked and thus they are unable to comment on this nomination until they are either unblocked or the block expires in a week. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is true, but MSgt2, MSgt3 and MSgt4 are all versions of the same image. The uploader should have used the "Upload a new version of this file" link instead of uploading a new file every time they improved the quality. MSgt2 is just an older version of MSgt3 (which is an older version of MSgt4) and MSgt3 was deleted. - Alexis Jazz 05:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My comment was not intended to be taken as being for or against the deletion of this file. Just wanted to note that if the uploader doesn't respond before this is resolved, then it could be because they couldn't respond and not necessarily because they agree that file should be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This very contemporary artwork is held in a museum and therefore appears to be non-free, absent permission from the museum. Softlavender (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture of this Israeli actress appears in several pages, including the one of the agency representing her. It has no place in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Colour degradation.jpg

Very likely Photoshop and, hence, a derivative work. I’m no hater of people doing some promotion here (incl. sexually attractive women), but will not tolerate deception. Which modern camera (except for very low end) can produce JPEG artifacts of this strength? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nessuna indicazione di licenze dal sito originale Threecharlie (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived work, Yoerivl might have copyright of the photo taken by himself, but not on the artist work. We need a declaration from the artist for that. Edoderoo (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio downloaded image of Malala Yousufzai. Störm (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from [7]. Ruthven (msg) 17:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor statue made after 2002. Regasterios (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, very small image, seems to have a watermark. Likely copyright violation. Themightyquill (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from art. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.cadena3.com/admin/playerswf/fotos/ARCHI_348717.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of File:Wind Erosion in north central South Dakota.webm. Known issue with Flickr2Commons Elisfkc (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of File:NFL Draft, Chicago 2016 (32887927224)-video.webm. Known issue with Flickr2Commons Elisfkc (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This particular screenshot, however, is a rather good still frame, and provides a good image of the what the stage looked like. Not certain if it is neccesary to keep or delete. I have a neutral stance. SecretName101 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per SecretName101. Ruthven (msg) 17:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the flag of Svalbard. It is not acknowledged in any Norwegian laws and has never been acknowledged by the Norwegian government. It has no use as Svalbard uses Norway's flag, and it as such cannot be used on anything related to Svalbard, but judging by the amount of Wikipedia articles this fictional flag is used on, both on the English Wikipedia and otherwise, that hasn't stopped many users from being misled into using it. For this reason, it's for the best to have it deleted, to prevent any future misunderstandings. TyholtApenes (talk) 17:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: As acknowledged above, the file is in use all over the place. As described in COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete a used file just because it is inaccurate. @TyholtApenes: I would suggest that you update the description of the file to correctly describe it, and maybe ask for it to be renamed. You might also want to look at the original, File:Flagg av Svalbard.png. @OnWikiNo: You may be interested in this, as the creator of the original. --bjh21 (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There are virtually no article currently using this. A handful, mainly seemingly translated during a brief period when this was on noWP. Guy 23:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep:
Português: Paz e bem! Basta alterar a descrição deixando claro que é bandeira nãooficial
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 17:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Svalbard does not have a flag and this fictitious flag is appearing as a real flag in other Wikis. It is not a useful fictional flag and has been deleted before and reuploaded. It does not belong in Wikimedia. GPinkerton (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: This file is now unused, partly by GPinkerton's own efforts. If it stays that way, I think it can finally be deleted. Note, though, that the formerly-deleted "flags of Svalbard" (Flag of Svalbard (local).JPG, Svalbard Flag.svg) seem to have been a completely different flag, shown on https://www.fotw.info/flags/sj-arms.html, so I don't think this is a case for CSD G4. --bjh21 (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Inventing flags for Svalbard seems to be popular: the one described in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Svalbard.png is different again. For anyone visiting this page in the future, this fictional flag of Svalbard is like the flag of Norway but with the red replaced with pale blue. --bjh21 (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag is made up and is in no way official. Provide an official source Cutlerys (talk) 04:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Fake flags are out of scope and have no value on any project. All previous flags using this name were deleted for the same reason: there is no Svalbard flag and any file with that name is fictitious, misleading, and out of scope. GPinkerton (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doesn't look like an own work, lack of EXIF information... Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Change it for copyvio from https://medium.com/programaonline/seminario-online-el-feminismo-como-máscara-del-marxismo-cultural-a-cargo-de-agustín-laje-66486d09a2a7.--EMans (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Dyolf77. Ruthven (msg) 17:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arrug89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions and missing metadata. The three other files uploaded by the same user were screenshots of non-free Youtube videos, and these are similar in appearance.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photos. Regasterios (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; contains copyrighted material. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thunder_-_Wood_block_dancing.webm ComputerHotline (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Emil Filén (1890-1953). Estormiz (talk) 18:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Oskari Jauhiainen (1913-1990). Estormiz (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Oskari Jauhiainen (1913-1990). Estormiz (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hatte Inhalte von de/Wikipedia anders interpretiert. Ich stimme der Löschung zu / I had interpreted the contents of de/Wikipedia differently. I agree with the deletion.

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Jussi Mäntynen (1886-1978). Estormiz (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Jussi Mäntynen (1886-1978). But this is also a picture of the square in the park, not a clear case. Estormiz (talk) 18:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Pekka Jylhä (b.1955). Estormiz (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why ?--Remontees (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Remontees: There is no Freedom of Panorama in France. This means that the copyright of any images of buildings whose architect has not been dead 70 years or more belong to the architect. --Elisfkc (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not only a copyright violation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oNqZfkHDEk, but an ADVERT Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and It is of no use Sek2016 (talk) 20:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

??  Keep ?? @Sek2016: Hold on just a second: you are not the author and also not the uploader. (but seemingly you would be the girl pictured) And the image is part of a gallery on a user page. (User:VGrigas (WMF)) - Alexis Jazz 06:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: personality rights. Ruthven (msg) 17:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Photographer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.correiodopovo-al.com.br/index.php/noticia/2012/08/01/novo-supermercado-todo-dia-sera-construido-no-trevo-do-bom-jesus
Converted by me to DR, as the provided external hit is not convincing, because it was published 3 years later than our upload and has far lower resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derived work from copyrighted material (the logo). Ruthven (msg) 17:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark register, can not be issued in the cc, code mark TO2010C002316 of uibm http://www.uibm.gov.it/uibm/dati/ ZioNicco (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: too simple to be copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 17:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:28A6:784D:877:7222 as Copyvio (Copyvio)
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion whether this logo is above COM:TOO. I tend to say yes. Source-website claims "Derechos Reservados@ Televisa S.A. de C.V.". -- Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Túrelio. Ruthven (msg) 17:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ANIRBANB724 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, small sizes without EXIFs, other uploads already speedy deleted

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image quality is so bad that the subject (Chantal Lamarre) is not really recognizable, so the picture is not useful for any educational content. Boréal (talk) 21:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Actually the photo is in use. Ruthven (msg) 18:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsharp + low resolution / better versions are available Geertivp (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsharp + low resolution / better versions are available Geertivp (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Panam2014. Ruthven (msg) 18:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://static.wixstatic.com/media/c14440_6810ea5968154f8db14ba3c9ba10a214~mv2_d_1736_2600_s_2.jpg/v1/fill/w_594,h_889,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/c14440_6810ea5968154f8db14ba3c9ba10a214~mv2_d_1736_2600_s_2.webp, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I have uploaded the wrong file. I tried uploading it again but it is giving me an error saying its a duplicate. The one I am uploading is a different picture but it is uploading the old picture again. I would like to delete this picture and upload a new picture. Drmaisel (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: apparently she is a Nepalese actress and model. In SCOPE. Ruthven (msg) 18:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: broken file. Ruthven (msg) 18:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Com:Toys, also several copyvios in uploader's contributions. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not useful as there is another picture just like it. AyodeleA1 (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made a mistake Upload the picture on the wrong place CGCSocialNetwork (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: you are not the uploader. Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Refrigerador23 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no use, just simple textD Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, not a valid reason. You need to explain why simple text isn't going to be useful: simple text is often quite useful. Nyttend (talk) 06:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, it's a clear case: The file ist just plain text, not used for any wikipage at all. Originally the file was created by Nemigo to illustrate a wikipage about the Spanish company "Astilleros y Talleres del Noroeste" (ASTANO). But as the company is abbreviated in upper-case letters only (ASTANO) and NOT in upper- and lower-case letters (Astano), the wrong logo is not in use any more and will not be used again. Thank you for deleting.--Refrigerador23 (talk) 08:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, this explanation is conclusive. We have no need for logos that don't represent reality, and a piece of plain text doesn't need to be represented with an image that isn't the real logo. Nyttend (talk) 00:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a joke? What is the conclusive explanation? Astano is the name of a company, part of its history. What do you mean, it's no longer used? Use it if you leave the admin that is vandalizing the page to be reused. I want to thank a user who has been on wikipedia for less than a week as a registered user for informing us all about what is no longer in use and its conclusive conclusions.--Nemigo galiza 20:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

OK, now the file is in use again. But it was not in use before... Sorry about that. But there are still two questions left: 1. Why do you create a logo of a company in plain text, which is in fact not the real logo of "Astilleros y Talleres del Noroeste"? 2. Why do you use a wrong abbreviation in upper- and lower-case letters (Astano) and not the correct abbreviation in upper-case letters (ASTANO)? Thank you and have a good day.--Refrigerador23 (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And by the way: If this file means that much to you, Nemigo, I can live with it if we keep it. Even though I actually still think it should be deleted... As a compromise I could accept a new logo in upper-case letters only ("ASTANO").--Refrigerador23 (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WTF? I don't know what you're talking about. The company name is written thus "Astano" was the trade mark of the company not "ASTANO". It had already made the name and logo of the company, as it was written in 1941. That mark was erased by an ex admin of wikipedia (twice) In the attached image of the Astano museum you can see to the right as it was written in the company. Please, you don't know anything about Astano. There are other sites where you can help

http://produccion.cultural.chacena.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/astano021.jpg --Nemigo galiza 21:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

 Comment The logo in upper- and lower-case letters (Astano) was really used in some places, you can see it here (in black), here (partially in blue), here (the two logos in white), and here. I don't know if it's the official logo or not, and if it's really in red or other color. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 17:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Another one. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all:

  • As I already said: Yes, yes I know that the file is now in use again - thanks to Nemigo who used it again on a wikipage. But it was not in use before... As I already said: Sorry about that.
  • And to make it very clear: The official name of that former shipbuilding company is and always was "Astilleros y Talleres del Noroeste", abbreviated "ASTANO" (again: it is a ABBREVIATION). But as Elisardojm proved with his pictures, it happened that both dictions have been used simultaneously, which in fact really means, that both "ASTANO" and "Astano" seem to be correct. Anyway: Even if we should decide to keep the file, I would strongly recommend, that in future on Wikipedia we prefer "ASTANO" to "Astano", because "Astano" is very mistakable. For example "Astano" is also the name (not just a abbreviation) of a Buddhist temple in Southeast Asia or the Name of a Town in Switzerland.
  • Nevertheless I am still convinced that the file Nemigo created is not really the official logo and should thus be deleted.

Considering all these (partially new) facts I would still say: "In dubio pro reo." (In doubt, for the accused.)--Refrigerador23 (talk) 08:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

in dubio... for workers (wikiusers)
You can see this image? -> https://latri.ca/uploads/151795114479.jpg
Is draw about Discoverer Enterprise (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discoverer_Enterprise) You can see name Astano? in official page for work --Nemigo galiza 21:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Kept: file can be used, thus can be in scope. You can add {{Fact disputed}} to indicate a fictional logo. Ruthven (msg) 18:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Te file is a shield of a football club, so the rights obviously belong to the club, not to the uploader Leon saudanha (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, close-up concert photo with no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Quite probably screenshot from YouTube. --Green Giant (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo without description, out of scope. Jcb (talk) 21:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

it was transfered from here: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/39_%D0%96%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%83 and will be used when uk.wiki file deleted. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 21:47, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. File deleted on UKWP earlier today. --Green Giant (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:28A6:784D:877:7222 as Copyvio (copyvio) — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, in my opinion this is simple logo. We have whole category:Telehit logos. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The file is not out of copyright in the US. -fireattack (talk) 08:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meets the Threshold of originality. Martin K. (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorshop information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. I did an extensive Google Images search, came up empty handed. P 1 9 9   13:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly from this photo session, band gives credit to Casey Holder. Flickr uploader is Delaney Gibson, making it Flickr washing. Source=https://www.instagram.com/p/Bdk5A4lFEWi/?taken-by=wearesigny Elisfkc (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Fyunck(click) has said that they have proof of permission from both Delaney Gibson and Casey Holder (see User talk:Elisfkc#SIGNY pic). They have been informed to submit this proof through COM:OTRS. --Elisfkc (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't recall saying I had proof other than messaging back and forth with the band, It was in the message that Delaney Gibson said Casey Holder was sitting next to her while they uploaded the photo to flickr. They must have had the original if the camera info was still there. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS wording says I shouldn't upload them anything if Flickr already has the proper licensing. I didn't upload the pic to Flickr... I just asked for a single photo. And OTR specifically says "e-mails from copyright holders wishing to allow Wikipedia to reuse their content (emails such as, "I allow Wikipedia to reuse my photos", etc.)" "are insufficient from a legal standpoint: we require a more-specific declaration of consent to accept your permission." So why would they accept a facebook messenger conversation? I can upload a screen print of the conversation, but would that really help? Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing... with the OTR upload form the first box that comes up is where i choose "I don't know the copyright holder". It stops me cold and says "Wikimedia OTRS cannot accept a release from you – please reach out to the copyright holder instead." So I can't upload the conversation. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Should I ask the band to have Casey Holder upload the same photo to flickr once again, under his own name, using the same license they used before (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic)? Would that be better? Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: Email the conversation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, with a link to the file page. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: I will email them a screen print of the relevant conversation. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I emailed it, though per the OTR page I don't see them considering it as much of anything since I don't represent the band in any way. We'll see. They'll probably look at the flickr page as their guide. Either way the backlog says it may take more than a month for them to check it out. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No OTRS, and it's been six weeks. Can be undeleted if permission is recieved. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]