Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/01
![]() |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
![]() |
|
|
{{speedydelete|mistaken upload}} Lianghuei (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied, per nomination by uploader on day of upload, unused. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Test upload, new user trying out uploading but not having the correct legal information Nextjr (talk) 03:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:36, 1 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
No CC-by 4.0 permissions on the original source. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 06:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: non-free image. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 07:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
copyvio. From https://www.mmtimes.com/news/wwf-myanmar-sounds-alarm-about-illegal-wildlife-trade.html 70.26.63.167 11:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:17, 1 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: taken from https://www.mmtimes.com/news/wwf-myanmar-sounds-alarm-about-illegal-wildlife-trade.html --Krdbot 19:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
I made a mistake uploading it here. Danielpc2010 (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 16:06, 1 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file --Krdbot 19:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
The deer and elephant artwork at the top is 2D, not allowed per COM:FOP#India. No source or license infomation. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:30, 2 Februar 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Victoria Poster.jpg --Krdbot 07:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:08, 2 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.ghgroupuk.com/about-george-houghton/ --Krdbot 13:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Image has been taken from https://www.sparksunderland.com/ and the uploader is the radio stations manager and is trying to promote their station as much as possible, The image isn't in use either, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 14:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of TP. E4024 (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Contains detailed biography only. --Achim (talk) 13:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
artefacts about porn, out of com:Scope
- File:Asahi Mizuno.jpg
- File:Ai Sayama Enjoyed This.jpg
- File:Anri Okita Enjoyed.jpg
- File:Yui Hatano Good.jpg
- File:Maki Hojo Eager.jpg
- File:Miku Ohashi.jpg
- File:Reiko Kobayakawa Cowgirl.jpg
- File:Minori Hatsune Started.jpg
- File:AV Mako Oda.jpg
- File:Nana Ogura Ready.jpg
- File:Hitomi Tanaka enjoyed this.jpg
- File:Hibiki Otsuki with cowgirl position.jpg
- File:Mkia thumbup.jpg
Pippobuono (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Personally I fail to see how these images lie within the scope of our project. I'm at a loss to image what project that might reasonably be used on. Thanks
- File:Nanao In A Good Mood.jpg
- File:Dan Mitsu Is Ready To Talk.jpg
- File:Anri Okita Nudity.jpg
- File:Reiko Kobayakawa Nudity.jpg
- File:Lisa Ann Nudity.jpg
- File:Ruri Saijo Nudity.jpg
- File:Hibiki Otsuki Nudity.jpg
- File:Mia Khalifa Nudity.jpg
- File:Asahi Mizuno Nude.jpg
- File:Sora Aoi Nudity.jpg
- File:Sora Aoi nude.jpg
- File:Asahi Mizuno.jpg
- File:Ai Sayama Enjoyed This.jpg
- File:Anri Okita Enjoyed.jpg
- File:Yui Hatano Good.jpg
- File:Maki Hojo Eager.jpg
- File:Miku Ohashi.jpg
- File:Reiko Kobayakawa Cowgirl.jpg
- File:Minori Hatsune Started.jpg
- File:AV Mako Oda.jpg
- File:Nana Ogura Ready.jpg
- File:Hitomi Tanaka enjoyed this.jpg
- File:Hibiki Otsuki with cowgirl position.jpg
- File:Mkia thumbup.jpg
Herby talk thyme 11:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily deleted as near-certain copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
may copyvio, Commons:DR
- File:Pamela Anderson.png
- File:Pro Kobayakawa.png
- File:Enjoy the table.png
- File:So Big.png
- File:Hitomi Game Over.png
- File:Hey! Not enough.png
- File:She is so good.png
- File:Shoot Hitomi Tanaka (Grey).jpg
- File:Kang So-ra OL.jpg
- File:Shoot Hitomi Tanaka.png
- File:Bit Mako Oda.png
- File:Go Hibiki Otsuki.png
- File:Lov Akari Asahina.png
- File:Inoue Mao ride on Saori Yoshida's shouldersride pickaback.png
- File:Pixie of beach volleyball.png
- File:Painting Koike Eiko.png
- File:Blue Girl.png
- File:Painting Lisa Ann.jpg
- File:Ready?Ayumi.png
shizhao (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Le couple de Jaseur des cèdres se sont fabriqués un nid douillet dans le lilas côtoyant la terrasse de notre jardin. Ils se sont servis du feuillage intense pour en faire une tente pour abriter le nid, ingénieux - panoramio.jpg
[edit]Very low quality image of unspecified bird, numerous better alternatives available. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Unspecified bird? In the file name and description it is written that it is a waxwing. We have the only photo of the waxwing in the nest.
Keep--Insider (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:Luigi di Bella 1997.jpg
- File:Luigi di Bella London 77.jpg
- File:Luigi di Bella London April 2001.jpg
- File:Nivaan sen.jpg
- File:Sizwe2.jpg
- File:Ternovska.jpg
- File:TRH Red Cap.jpg
- File:VivekTeraiya .jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 12:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 19:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Come on, just delete these photos. I do not want them on here any more. Otherwise I'll start posting the ones you don't like again with criticisms of this site (only 80% accurate) Markheffron2 (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep: I was neutral before, but that kind of threat makes me feel that a courtesy deletion would be excessively courteous. --bjh21 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Come on people, delete my files! I want them gone. <censored>. Markheffron2 (talk) 00:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Homeboy1197 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal, unused photos; failing COM:EDUSE
Ruthven (msg) 21:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Homeboy1197 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:AMEERRULSYESSSS.jpg
- File:King Adam with one of his many racing vehicles.png
- File:Ameer and Elvis.jpg
- File:Ameer Adam Prom.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
out of scope; personal image/selfie theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photos and selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal Webhost Afifa Afrin (talk) 04:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
no educational value - Out of scope Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused apparent personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joaolazaro9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos an selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhony Padilla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moritz Wagner der 1. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos, mostly selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Balztanz des Jakobs in der Paarungszeit.jpg
- File:JakobusAphidoidea.jpg
- File:Johann Jakob Falcke *23.04.2000.jpg
- File:Lolo der gute Mann.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uvksborofficiel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:KristenWillard
[edit]- File:Venture logo.jpg
- File:Images.131.jpg
- File:Images.102.jpg
- File:Images.119.jpg
- File:Images.023.jpg
- File:Praying at the End.jpg
- File:Images.097.jpg
- File:Love Does 2013 FinishLine.jpg
- File:Love Does 2013 - Celebrating the End of the Journey.jpg
- File:Love Does 2013 - Looking at Big Sur.jpg
- File:Venture IJM Team 2012.jpg
- File:Love Does 2013 - Venture Van meets lifeguard stand at Pt. Magu.jpg
Unused promotional and mostly watermarked images of no possible educational use. About half were formerly in w:User:KristenWillard/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 02:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Tiny, unused, and defaced by a watermark. (The copyright release is credible enough that OTRS doesn't seem worth bothering with, though.) Formerly in w:User:CJ Rider/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 02:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused self-portrait of an artist without an article, and too small for any other conceivable educational use. Formerly in w:User:CJ Rider/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Cropped from this image, located at this location. The image is clearly a screenshot of a television broadcast. Rights to the image very likely belong to the television broadcaster Bharti Airtel, whose watermarks appears in the upper left of the source image, and not the uploader, even if he is the subject of the image. At a minimum, we would need a release statement from the broadcaster indicating a transfer of rights to the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep. This image very legitimete. INCREDIBLE INDIA (talk) 22:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Confirmed on enwiki as a sock of Suman Kumar Mallick; the uploader is also a sock aswell. theinstantmatrix (talk) 15:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Delete clear copyvio taken from https://twitter.com/SumanKumarMall2, and it's very unlikely we would obtain permission from the broadcaster. theinstantmatrix (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope again; created by a sock of Suman Kumar Mallick theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Once again recreated, and still a copyright violation. Created by yet another sock of Suman Kumar Mallick. Of note; no point in salting this against creation; the sockpuppet here has a long history of creating alternate names of himself, and will very likely just create an alternat filename if this one is salted. Hammersoft (talk) 18:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G4. --Majora (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image/broken image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
very bad quality, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image. 125.227.40.133 05:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image. 125.227.40.133 05:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 07:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr.kanha garg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal type images, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sainath tumma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vovakazakov343 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused, no forseeable educational use, and out of focus. Formerly in w:Draft:Kiruba Foundation. —Cryptic (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope as an unused personal photo. Formerly in w:Draft:Kiruba Foundation. —Cryptic (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope as an unused personal photo. Formerly in w:Draft:Kiruba Foundation. —Cryptic (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Probably no educational value. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Renato Luan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Niazgeopk
[edit]Unused private images. No useful contributions by user. --DavidIvar (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal logo Apocheir (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused self-promotional image Apocheir (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private image of unknown person. Not used. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, probable self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
copyright of artwork SecretName101 (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - it is Commons policy to completely ignore non-copyright restrictions of this sort -- see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Museum_and_interior_photography. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This image contravenes the conditions of entry to the Auckland Museum, which clearly state no photographing in the Maori court. http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/plan-your-visit/photography-filming Sarah (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Located here, the link is on this page (click on "female"), and there is copyright information on the page (in detail here) allowing "personal and/or educational use" and other uses via a "fair-use agreement". This is not compatible with Commons licenses and it is not the CC license placed on it by the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
From this website, which does not have any licensing information at all. Just need to confirm where the CC-BY-4.0 license came from or that the uploader has permission to use the file. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mojtaba rks (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and selfie.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo, low quality, copyright status highly uncertain since this looks like a screenshot. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Obviously a copyright violation. TV screen grab and claimed as own work. samee 01:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
See the © logo, UNISYS images are copyrighted. B dash (talk) 01:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work. See COM:FOP#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work. See COM:FOP#Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work. See COM:FOP#Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
"Anonyme" is not a name of photograph - all photos published in reviews in 1970 in France are not DP. Licence abusive Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- couverture de la revue http://www.chire.fr/A-169810-n-161-162-juil-aout-1990-in-memoriam-pierre-pascal.aspx --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
fake author (it's not "none") ; impossible to say who is the illistrator who signed the picture, impossible without the name to say that the illustrator is DP. (the contibutor is specialised in fake information about pictures) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
No Permission, no meta data
- File:পরশুরাম মিশ্র.jpg
- File:Dhonekhali shari WB 26 Jan 2018.png
- File:173 - Certificate of Registration - 06-01-2012.pdf
- File:Certificate of Registration - 06-01-2012-page-002 dhaniakhali shari.jpg
- File:Certificate of Registration - 06-01-2012-page-001 Dhaniakhali shari.jpg
- File:Dhonekhali shari WB 24 Jan 2018.jpg
- File:Talpatar sipai WB 24 Jan 2018.png
- File:Doll of bengal WB 24 jan 2018.png
- File:Wooden doll WB 24 Jan 2018.png
- File:Monosha ghot 24 jan 2018.png
- File:Tusu putul WB 24 jan 2018.png
- File:Bonga Hati WB 23 Jan 2018.png
- File:Diplokshmi putul WB 23 Jan 2018.png
- File:শিবের মুখোস.png
- File:Kathaliyar police putul WB 18 JAN 2018.jpg
- File:Dokra Model WB 15 Jan 2018.jpg
- File:Dokra model Devi Durga WB 15 Jan 2018.jpg
- File:Clay doll of Krishnagar WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:HIngul Putul WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Shasthi Putul WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Rani Putul WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Doll of clay WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Dasabatar card of Bengal WB 15 JAN 2018.jpg
- File:Doll of Jhulan festival WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Doll of Jhulan festival Kalighat WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Doll of Terracotta Bankura WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Jo Putul WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Head waving doll WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:Kathaliya Putul WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:আশ্চর্য প্রদীপ Aschorjo Prodip পশ্চিমবঙ্গ WB 15 JAN 2018.png
- File:নতুন গ্রামের কাথ্রে পুতুল.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- I gave the source and the source is open source so I hope I'm free to use. Moreover this pictures are basically very needy pictures, as they are wealth of our earth. And folk cultures are being lost every day. To keep their existence there is a only one way, that is photo. So they are too valuable. It is my request keep these photo, and ofcourse these are taken from open source.
Thanks শক্তিশেল (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: For most of these, there are two copyrights -- one for the image and the other for the work of art shown. In some cases where there are more than one work of art, there are even more copyrights. I see no evidence that there are free licenses for any of the images or any of the art. Please note that in order for an image you find on the Web to be free for Commons, it must have an explicit free license. If there is no license, then the work is not free. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Front page of a 1994 London newpaper is protected by copyright laws. DGtal (talk) 07:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Image represents a personal attack on a living person and has no constructive value to the Commons. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Any image that depicts anyone as Hitler (other than Hitler himself) does not belong.--64.229.165.48 22:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be own work, available at http://www.histarmar.com.ar/SubArch/CARLOSPVAIRO/Vairo-Governoren/Governoren.htm in higher resolution 4ing (talk) 08:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Answer: The author of the file: GovernorenSvend Foyn 2003.jpg is Carlos Pedro Vairo and he has assigned the rights for this publication to Commons and to the Fundación Histarmar. If you need a better resolution of the photo, o cualquier otra prueba I can send it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jib06 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Carlos Pedro Vairo must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Unua libro per russi - 1887 - 1a edizione - frontespizio - copia del bibliofilo italiano Paolo Barbieri.jpg
[edit]motivi di privacy Irokraft (talk) 08:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
For privacy purpose Irokraft (talk) 08:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: blank page -- no image there. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This and many other files have been deleted in the past as copyvios, but they keep getting reuploaded. —SpacemanSpiff 09:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Uploader has been spamming/advertising on en.wiki and here. Many uploads have been deleted as copyvios or for lack of proper license but he keeps uploading them again and again
- File:Arsh Shah Dilbagi at TEDxGateway.jpg
- File:Arsh Shah Dilbagi somewhere in NYC.jpg
- File:Arsh Shah Dilbagi in NYC on a rooftop.jpg
- File:Arsh Shah Dilbagi at a conference in NYC.jpg
- File:Arsh Shah Dilbagi in NYC.jpg
- File:Arsh Shah Dilbagi with a Camera.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 09:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hantish mhugo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Not used on a valid user page - user page currently just consists of this photo Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE.. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, formerly in w:Draft:Deepak Kalal. —Cryptic (talk) 02:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sevisofgod (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type images, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krishna shah classic computer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type images, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This a fake user Photo Kobitasaha365 (talk) 15:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Unused personal photo of a user who has no other edits on any project, COM:OOS. Background looks like it was photoshopped. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This a fake user Photo Kobitasaha365 (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liuqiuwangguo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, no camera info in EXIF, unlikely own work
- File:台湾监察部门负责人张博雅.jpg => File:中华民国监察院 张博雅 2016-10-02.jpg
- File:林炳坤主席.jpg
- File:林炳坤半身像.jpg
- File:林炳坤.jpg
Wcam (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Also out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Attipasimage.png
- File:Attipas Imitations.jpg
- File:Natural herb info.jpg
- File:Attipas designs.jpg
- File:Attipas 5 points.pdf
- File:Attipas NaturalHerb.jpg
- File:Attipas Research and development.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 05:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnnysilas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jimmy Tremblay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:0973-logo-e1490990410180 04.png
- File:0973-logo-e1490990410180 03.png
- File:0973-logo-e1490990410180 01.png
- File:0973-logo-e1490990410180 02.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Promotional material Mindmatrix 16:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Promotional material Mindmatrix 16:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Promotional material Mindmatrix 16:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Not used. No other useful contributions by user. DavidIvar (talk) 17:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotional Apocheir (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erlandhino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jairam Beeram (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
promotional material Mindmatrix 18:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused private image. Self-promotion. No other contributions by user. DavidIvar (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Promotional image uploaded for use in a promotional page on EN Wikipedia. Out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Very small size. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope - unused personal image. Aubrey Jett 88 (talk) 01:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal and text-only image Apocheir (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused promotional image Apocheir (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
no educational value Brianna Haley (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acordeoneroadv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotion
- File:Fara fara norteño en monterrey.jpeg
- File:Fara fara en monterrey norteño.jpeg
- File:Grupos norteños musicales en monterrey.jpeg
- File:Grupos musicales norteños en monterrey.jpeg
- File:Grupos norteños en monterrey.jpeg
Apocheir (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Copyrightinternational (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Brianna Haley (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grupo BalacoBaco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion and personal images
- File:EP Chocolate.png
- File:1° CD Tá Pensando Que Eu Tô De Bobeira.jpg
- File:Vinicinhus.jpg
- File:Riquinho Bastos.jpg
- File:Junior Itaguaí.jpg
- File:Nego Feijão.jpg
- File:Anderson Bombom.jpg
- File:André Orelha.jpg
- File:Grupo BalacoBaco.png
- File:Grupo balacobaco.png
Apocheir (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Igreja Pentecostal Cristo Para As Nações Em Missões Sede Nacional (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, self-promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused Self-promotional and personal images
Apocheir (talk) 21:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonu Aqeel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused band promo photo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
unused/uncategorized screenshot of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HVFundacion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, self-promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
no educational value Brianna Haley (talk) 22:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Original copyrighted by ISRO, but this particular image seems to be a derivative as the size does not match with the original. Gazoth (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
License laundered copyright violation 174.89.217.31 04:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Doubtful claim of "own work" and certainly not date claimed. Image available at least at [1] from at least Nov 2017 Begoon 09:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
mistaken upload Lianghuei (talk) 09:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
mistaken upload Lianghuei (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
mistaken upload Lianghuei (talk) 09:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bhattaraimadhav.nepal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:User Picture.jpg
- File:Shot of Swargadwari.jpg
- File:Swargadwari temple with Portrait.jpg
- File:Swargadwari temple with Portrait 2.jpg
- File:Morning view of Swargadwari.jpg
- File:Swargadwari View.jpg
- File:Swargadwari Temple from north.jpg
- File:Swargadwari Temple front.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Not used and doesn't seem to be in scope. E4024 (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}}. Non-free image grabbed from Google with false licensing claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Content on http://www.thebrunettediaries.com is copyrighted ; no evidence that copyright has been released. See also previous copyvios: File:Barkha-sharma.jpg from same uploader, & numerous others used on same enwiki page. David Biddulph (talk) 13:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This probably could've been tagged for speedy deletion using {{Copyvio}}. EXIF data also lists the copyright holder as "© 2013 Porus Vimadalal", who seems to be an Indian fashion photographer.[2][3] So, unless the uploader is the photographer, or can clearly show this has been released under a free license by the photographer, this shouldn't be kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Ronhjones. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ne me rappelais plus de celle-là. Si elle n'est pas trouvable dans les Bundesarchiv, bien sûr OK pour la suppression. Merci à Vigneron de m'avoir averti avant. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This a fake user Kobitasaha365 (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France and the building is apparently modern. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jinairwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion, unused
- File:JINI Plus seat.jpg
- File:Jin air rapping aircraft .jpg
- File:Jin air green wings.png
- File:Jinair ci.png
- File:Jin air CI.jpg
- File:Jinair safety.jpg
- File:승무원.jpg
- File:진에어, 지니플레이 (3).jpg
- File:Jini play.jpg
Apocheir (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Two sepia toned modern images uploaded and attached to a page which was declined by es: wiki, see [4], Commons isn't personal photo album, nor for promotional purposes.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused, self-promotion / personal
- File:La Trilogía Inc.jpg
- File:Zowwy en entrevista.jpg
- File:Zowwy vera en concierto.jpg
- File:Zowwy.jpg
Apocheir (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Lacks of permission, + unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nia-Watchever (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, self-promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
copyvio: Das Wasserzeichen im Bild stimmt nicht mit der Urheberangabe überein. Foreign Species (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
(c) Sylvie Charmoy, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Essam karam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of project scope.
- File:.عصام كرم الطوخى.jpg
- File:..عصام كرم الطوخي.jpg
- File:عصام كرم الطوخي.jpg
- File:عصام كرم الطوخى.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio content. Present in too many copyrighted websites. Check out Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A file is not a copyvio because it is present in too many copyrighted websites. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
No probs that it is a NASA image. B dash (talk) 01:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This photo has been taken by Scott Kelly, astronaut on the International Space Station. I've fixed source and author in the file description. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Google map images are copyrighted. B dash (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- NASA maps are public domain, this uses a NASA generated map. Oaktree b (talk) 03:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Nope, this is the map of Google Earth which is copyrighted. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- File:SalemCity Collage.jpg (uses this image as a constituent part)
Came via Facebook. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- File:SalemCity Collage.jpg uses this image as a constituent part. -- Begoon 02:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Begoon: Fine, let's include that, too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, the image contains tracking metadata from Facebook. Its copyright status is hence unknown as the source was not provided. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Fake date (Gerra dead in 1979 https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinando_Gerra) ; false name of photograph (confusion contributor / author of the pictures). Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 03:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This is obviously a scan and thereby unlikely to be the own work by the uploader as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Carmen Hoya (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
The main purpose of this file is hate speech only. This is because file's description and ja:special:diff/41819696. Please see below.
“ |
この世に核兵器と韓国はいらない。 → There is no need nuclear weapons and Korea in the world. |
” |
“ |
この利用者は韓国及び韓国人・在日韓国人を心の底から嫌っています。 → This user hate Korea and Korean people & Zainichi from the bottom of his/her heart. |
” |
Thanks --Garam (talk) 07:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This is obviously out of COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
All uploads of this occasional visitor seem to be taken from internet sites. For instance this one might have been grabbed from "ebay" online sales. E4024 (talk) 09:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: All uploads by the user share the same EXIF data. I do not see a reason why we should distrust them. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Single file upload by user, seems to be from a website. Could even be a "prank" from a student as profile states her name and who she is (which is unusual I think). Perhaps remove profile altogether? 2 edits only, one for profile & this upload. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Nicola McNee is/was the Kingwood librarian,[5] and I see no reason not to Commons:Assume good faith that it was she who submitted this photo. Rwendland (talk) 14:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- OK, but if she didn't take the photo can she release it as stated? -- Deadstar (msg) 10:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This appears to be a photo of Nicola Kelly which probably was not taken by herself. It was published before (see https://twitter.com/nicolamcnee). Hence, this would require a permission coming through our support team by the photographer. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This requires permission coming through our support team, not just for the photo but also in regard to the depicted copyrighted material. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, this needs a written permission by Andreas von Einsiedel, to be forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, this needs a written permission by Andreas von Einsiedel, to be forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Subject has withdrawn donation of media, and photographer has not provided a CC release. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, no response since more than a week now. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
no own work copyright Pitpisit (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This is unlikely to be the own work by the uploader. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
This caligraphy is way beyond simple shapes and text. IMHO the threshold of originality ist met here: Therefore it ist not public domain. Martin K. (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This appears to be a work by Paramount Pictures, hence US copyright law applies. Per section 906.4 of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices (see pp. 537 in this PDF) typography and callygraphy are not eligible for copyright. While this text admits that some typeface ornamentation that is separable from the typeface characters may be eligible, it makes clear that
- “the mere use of text effects (including chalk, popup, papercraft, neon, beer glass, spooky-fog, and weathered-and-worn), while potentially separable, is de minimis”
In this case, I do not think that it goes beyond this. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Scuplture in Russia by ru:Бабурин, Михаил Фёдорович (died 1984). No freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
small, out of scope? Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. The uploader uploaded this image and added it to their user page in a WP. Let's see in the coming week or so if they are intending to become a real Wikipedian or are only interested in hanging the pic. E4024 (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
No permission, taken from: kortrijk.n-va.be © 2018 N-VA Rode raaf (talk) 11:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This requires indeed a permission forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by clearer photo File:Baquetas y otros materiales.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Seems to be a derivative of one or more other images but we have no idea of their origin/copyright status etc Sitush (talk) 12:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Has been published before here. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
File:A missionary voyage to the Southern Pacific Ocean, performed in the years 1796, 1797, 1798, in the ship Duff, commanded by Captain James Wilson Fleuron T087461-15.png
[edit]This is not a fleuron, but part of a map. I looked it up and created a new file with the whole map File:1797 map of Fiji by James Wilson explorer.jpg, so perhaps this can be deleted? -- Deadstar (msg) 12:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC) NB I was going to overwrite, but realised I had a jpg file, not a png, and the name would then be incorrect, so decided to upload a new file.
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by new upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image exists: File:Rio Santana - panoramio.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Uploader has claimed to release the image under CC-by-SA 4.0, but the image still clearly carries a copyright disclaimer. WikiDan61 (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Used only on a user page and a draft. --E4024 (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Images is released under CC-by-SA 4.0, but clearly contains a copyright claim. WikiDan61 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment: Those are not incompatible. Indeed, without copyright, CC licence terms would be meaningless. --bjh21 (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
This picture is so bad that the depicted individual is not identifiable; it is not even sure that it is indeed Marc Gabriel (see him there). Thus, it is unusable for any educational content. Boréal (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:LOS NIÑOS Y ADOLESCENTES EN COLOMBIA.pdf
- File:Gomez Jennyfer lic en pedagogia infantil semestre octavo semana 7 revista importancia dde la gestion educactiva -.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Klára Kertész's works
[edit]- File:Pottery of Klára Kertész in the Szatmári Museum.jpg
- File:Ceramics of Klára Kertész in the Szatmári Museum.jpg
- File:Exhibition of ceramics of Klára Kertész in the Szatmári Museum.jpg
The artist is Klára Kertész who died in 1997. --Regasterios (talk) 16:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Complex logo. Scope? E4024 (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
WWW.FUNCJESUS.ORG FUNDACIÓN CENANDO CON JESÚS INC Fue creada por el dr. wilson batista y la lcda. maribel con la finalidad de ayudar a las personas pobres que no tienen recursos, entre ellos a los envejecientes y niños pobres, que son los mas afectado en la sociedad de R.D. esta ONG nació el dia 18 de julio del año 2014 lo que mas impulso a estas personas a crear esta ONG fue el amor de JESÚS CRISTO, el autor r principal de esta ONG fue el sr. WILSON BATISTA que se arrepintió a los pies de jesus cristo el dia 1 de enero del año 2011 y Dios le puso en el corazón que ayude a los pobres, te invitamos a que visite esta pagina web y conozcan los trabajos sociales que hacen estas personas que son instrumentos de Dios.WWW.FUNCJESUS.ORG y en FACEBOOK.COM comparte y apoyarlo con un me gusta y con tus aportes para que ellos continúen llevando alegría a los pobres — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.42.238.239 (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
author request this to be deleted. Chingwa golgol (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep: The file is in use on three Wikipedias, at en:Crease pattern, fr:Origami, zh:摺紙, and zh:摺紙步驟圖. It's been on Commons since 2008, so CSD G7 really doesn't apply. --bjh21 (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Bjh21. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:C.Duclos certificat de travail Robert B. GOLDSCHMIDT 20 septembre 1910.pdf
- File:C.Duclos certificat de bonne conduite et de capacité CAM Dunkerque 20 février 1918.jpg
- File:C. Duclos certificat bonne conduite "le Friand" 5 février 1910.jpg
- File:C.Duclos CAM Dunkerque 1917.jpg
- File:C.Duclos civil médailles.jpg
- File:C.Duclos Nacelle.png
- File:C.Duclos parachute 1916.png
- File:C.Duclos cigare 1916.png
- File:C.Duclos en tenue en 1917 ovale.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted movie poster improperly uploaded to Commons TAnthony (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Claudio Guirin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Francisco Deres...jpg
- File:Pompa Funebre Kaiser Carabela.jpg
- File:Acompañamiento .jpg
- File:Ceremonia de responso o Misa de cuerpo presente.jpg
- File:Pompa Funebre "Empresa Gallardo".jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pirsharafshah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.mizanonline.ir/files/fa/news/1396/3/17/1164183_609.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pirsharafshah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal pics
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agusbaigorria1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://carwow-uk-wp-3.imgix.net/audi-a8-red-front-static.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Redudant. Almost similar image exists: File:Jvma 7.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Redudant. Almost similar image exists: File:Jvma 7.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too unclear to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:BBROPHOTO
[edit]- File:Church Street, Chesham 2017.jpg
- File:View of The Queens Head, Chesham.jpg
- File:St Mary's Church, Chesham 2017.jpg
I no longer want them on Wikipedia / Wikimedia BBROPHOTO (talk) 20:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent uploads. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
This is an unattributed derivative work and should be deleted on this ground. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Incnis Mrsi. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
no educational value Brianna Haley (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
A completely own work by the author of such masterpiece as File:Huioo.jpg, do anyone believe? This is a derivative work without attribution. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Incnis Mrsi, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
The object is unclear. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal art, unused Apocheir (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also File:ThoughtfulPit OpenEdition LoRes.jpg, File:InAPerfectWorldLoRes.jpg, File:Dean Russo.jpg (photo of the artist). -Apocheir (talk) 21:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded correct version, this signature was of a relative of his but not himself Barbudo Barbudo (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kumbamusica (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TracciaViola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, self-promotion
Apocheir (talk) 21:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leghoster285 (talk · contribs)
[edit]...leg host? Unused, self-promotional
- File:Leghost emergente.jpg
- File:Ghost Graffiti.jpg
- File:Leghost (2).JPG
- File:Leghost - Club Tucuman.JPG
- File:Matt Leghost 1.jpg
- File:LEGHOST LOGO.jpg
Apocheir (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope, self-promotion. These images were uploaded to illustrate an article in es:Wikipedia. Such article, about a rock band, was deleted on repeated occasions because it was promotional (see delete log). --Gusama Romero </talk> 05:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
No source for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This is a simple map outline. Per COM:DW: Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable.. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
No source for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This is a simple map outline. Per COM:DW: Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable.. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Deriviative work from here. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
I was Trying to make Eclipse chasing Photo to look nice for the page on Wikipedia! --Out of this World Adventure (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. And ugly photoshopped image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 21:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot of File:NFL Draft, Chicago 2016 (33689810976)-video.webm. Known issue with Flickr2Commons Elisfkc (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
I support deletion per nom.SecretName101 (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Part of mass upload; very low quality of llamas, many better alternatives available. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless personal photograph. JIP (talk) 15:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal pet photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps we have a single photo of a cat with a cat statue.
Keep --Insider (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless personal photograph. JIP (talk) 15:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Disneyland Paris
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC) ![]()
Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyrighted site plans.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC) I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Kept a general view and a DM. Ruthven (msg) 13:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 02:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Kept those there there was no central architecture artifact. Ruthven (msg) 20:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC) |
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 10
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3735 (15978502417).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3738 (16162374911).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3741 (15976966130).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3747 (15544508613).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3797 (15978215869).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3803 (15976834748).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3830 (16164269265).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3860 (15976833358).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3865 (16163522682).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3906 (15976961540).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3912 (16164267475).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3936 (15976831288).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3945 (15541918874).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3972 (15978494307).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3999 (15978493667).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4009 (15541916704).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4015 (15976957390).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4017 (16162365941).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4040 (15976826268).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4050 (15976955490).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4282 (15541906594).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4285 (16162356521).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4287 (15541905574).jpg
- File:Lights, Motors, Action - panoramio.jpg
- File:Toon Studio Ratatouille area.jpg
- File:Walt Disney Studios entrada principal.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is
kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 12
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:City Hall - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Discoveryland - Autopia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Discoveryland - panoramio.jpg
- File:Discoveryland - Space Mountain - panoramio.jpg
- File:DisneyLand - panoramio - Yurij.jpg
- File:DisneyLand - panoramio.jpg
- File:Disneyland Parijs - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Disneyland Parijs - panoramio.jpg
- File:Disneyland Paris park entrance - panoramio.jpg
- File:Disneyland Paris, Francia - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Disneyland Paris, Francia - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Fantasyland - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:Hollywood Tower Disney - panoramio.jpg
- File:OLVIDADOS - panoramio.jpg
- File:Walt Disney Studios - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Studios - panoramio.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 19
[edit]No COM:FOP in France. Pictures are of copyrighted buildings, characters, topiaries, and/or parade floats
- File:5 de treboles (5071099862).jpg
- File:Disney Stars on Parade at Disneyland Paris (2022).jpg
- File:Disney Stars on Parade at Disneyland Paris (2024).jpg
- File:Disneyland Hotel 2.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 01.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 02.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 03.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 04.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 05.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 07.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 10.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 11.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 13.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 21:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
This file has been replaced by File:MSgt4.png. Since MSgt3.png was deleted, it makes no sense if this file is kept. - Alexis Jazz 01:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: In fairness to the file's uploader, even though they were properly notified of this discussion, their account is currently blocked and thus they are unable to comment on this nomination until they are either unblocked or the block expires in a week. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- This is true, but MSgt2, MSgt3 and MSgt4 are all versions of the same image. The uploader should have used the "Upload a new version of this file" link instead of uploading a new file every time they improved the quality. MSgt2 is just an older version of MSgt3 (which is an older version of MSgt4) and MSgt3 was deleted. - Alexis Jazz 05:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- My comment was not intended to be taken as being for or against the deletion of this file. Just wanted to note that if the uploader doesn't respond before this is resolved, then it could be because they couldn't respond and not necessarily because they agree that file should be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- This is true, but MSgt2, MSgt3 and MSgt4 are all versions of the same image. The uploader should have used the "Upload a new version of this file" link instead of uploading a new file every time they improved the quality. MSgt2 is just an older version of MSgt3 (which is an older version of MSgt4) and MSgt3 was deleted. - Alexis Jazz 05:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Low quality. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: In fairness to the file's uploader, even though they were properly notified of this discussion, their account is currently blocked and thus they are unable to comment on this nomination until they are either unblocked or the block expires in a week. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- This has been replaced by File:Sergeant_(yellow_pin)_1.png. (from the same uploader) Sgt2.png was used on w:Richland County Sheriff's Department. There is also File:ViCPDRank.png and File:SuptRank.png, they are not used anywhere and the description/filename are so vague I just can't figure out what I'm looking at. The filename seems to suggest it's for w:Victoria Police Department. Descriptions and filenames like "rank", "VicPD Supt." and "SuptRank.png" are hardly helping. I found the Victoria PD with a combination of guesswork and looking at Fhsig13's contribs on enwiki. I will ask Fhsig13 to try and enter better filenames/descriptions in the future. (when the block expires) - Alexis Jazz 04:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This very contemporary artwork is held in a museum and therefore appears to be non-free, absent permission from the museum. Softlavender (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
The picture of this Israeli actress appears in several pages, including the one of the agency representing her. It has no place in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Very likely Photoshop and, hence, a derivative work. I’m no hater of people doing some promotion here (incl. sexually attractive women), but will not tolerate deception. Which modern camera (except for very low end) can produce JPEG artifacts of this strength? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
nessuna indicazione di licenze dal sito originale Threecharlie (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
derived work, Yoerivl might have copyright of the photo taken by himself, but not on the artist work. We need a declaration from the artist for that. Edoderoo (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio downloaded image of Malala Yousufzai. Störm (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from [7]. Ruthven (msg) 17:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Indoor statue made after 2002. Regasterios (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution, very small image, seems to have a watermark. Likely copyright violation. Themightyquill (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from art. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.cadena3.com/admin/playerswf/fotos/ARCHI_348717.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot of File:Wind Erosion in north central South Dakota.webm. Known issue with Flickr2Commons Elisfkc (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot of File:NFL Draft, Chicago 2016 (32887927224)-video.webm. Known issue with Flickr2Commons Elisfkc (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- This particular screenshot, however, is a rather good still frame, and provides a good image of the what the stage looked like. Not certain if it is neccesary to keep or delete. I have a neutral stance. SecretName101 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per SecretName101. Ruthven (msg) 17:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This is not the flag of Svalbard. It is not acknowledged in any Norwegian laws and has never been acknowledged by the Norwegian government. It has no use as Svalbard uses Norway's flag, and it as such cannot be used on anything related to Svalbard, but judging by the amount of Wikipedia articles this fictional flag is used on, both on the English Wikipedia and otherwise, that hasn't stopped many users from being misled into using it. For this reason, it's for the best to have it deleted, to prevent any future misunderstandings. TyholtApenes (talk) 17:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep: As acknowledged above, the file is in use all over the place. As described in COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete a used file just because it is inaccurate. @TyholtApenes: I would suggest that you update the description of the file to correctly describe it, and maybe ask for it to be renamed. You might also want to look at the original, File:Flagg av Svalbard.png. @OnWikiNo: You may be interested in this, as the creator of the original. --bjh21 (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- There are virtually no article currently using this. A handful, mainly seemingly translated during a brief period when this was on noWP. Guy 23:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep:
Português: Paz e bem! Basta alterar a descrição deixando claro que é bandeira nãooficialEugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 17:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Svalbard does not have a flag and this fictitious flag is appearing as a real flag in other Wikis. It is not a useful fictional flag and has been deleted before and reuploaded. It does not belong in Wikimedia. GPinkerton (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete: This file is now unused, partly by GPinkerton's own efforts. If it stays that way, I think it can finally be deleted. Note, though, that the formerly-deleted "flags of Svalbard" (Flag of Svalbard (local).JPG, Svalbard Flag.svg) seem to have been a completely different flag, shown on https://www.fotw.info/flags/sj-arms.html, so I don't think this is a case for CSD G4. --bjh21 (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment Inventing flags for Svalbard seems to be popular: the one described in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Svalbard.png is different again. For anyone visiting this page in the future, this fictional flag of Svalbard is like the flag of Norway but with the red replaced with pale blue. --bjh21 (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This flag is made up and is in no way official. Provide an official source Cutlerys (talk) 04:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete flag is fictitious and is no longer COM:INUSE (it was used on w:pnb:یورپ, but I removed it). --SHB2000 (talk)
Keep has been in use for a long time (see previous DRs), and therefore is in scope. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is not in use now because I removed it from all pages that used it. Fictitious flags are not in scope. SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete Fake flags are out of scope and have no value on any project. All previous flags using this name were deleted for the same reason: there is no Svalbard flag and any file with that name is fictitious, misleading, and out of scope. GPinkerton (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
I doesn't look like an own work, lack of EXIF information... Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Change it for copyvio from https://medium.com/programaonline/seminario-online-el-feminismo-como-máscara-del-marxismo-cultural-a-cargo-de-agustín-laje-66486d09a2a7.--EMans (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Dyolf77. Ruthven (msg) 17:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions and missing metadata. The three other files uploaded by the same user were screenshots of non-free Youtube videos, and these are similar in appearance.
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted photos. Regasterios (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; contains copyrighted material. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thunder_-_Wood_block_dancing.webm ComputerHotline (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Emil Filén (1890-1953). Estormiz (talk) 18:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hatte Inhalte von de/Wikipedia anders interpretiert. Ich stimme der Löschung zu / I had interpreted the contents of de/Wikipedia differently. I agree with the deletion. --Eduard47 (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Oskari Jauhiainen (1913-1990). Estormiz (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hatte Inhalte von de/Wikipedia anders interpretiert. Ich stimme der Löschung zu / I had interpreted the contents of de/Wikipedia differently. I agree with the deletion. --Eduard47 (talk) 16:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Oskari Jauhiainen (1913-1990). Estormiz (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hatte Inhalte von de/Wikipedia anders interpretiert. Ich stimme der Löschung zu / I had interpreted the contents of de/Wikipedia differently. I agree with the deletion.
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Jussi Mäntynen (1886-1978). Estormiz (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hatte Inhalte von de/Wikipedia anders interpretiert. Ich stimme der Löschung zu / I had interpreted the contents of de/Wikipedia differently. I agree with the deletion.--Eduard47 (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Jussi Mäntynen (1886-1978). But this is also a picture of the square in the park, not a clear case. Estormiz (talk) 18:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- I think, it is a picture of the square in the park, with tall buildings around and a sculpture in the middle. --Eduard47 (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
FOP in Finland does not include statues. The sculpture is work of Pekka Jylhä (b.1955). Estormiz (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hatte Inhalte von de/Wikipedia anders interpretiert. Ich stimme der Löschung zu / I had interpreted the contents of de/Wikipedia differently. I agree with the deletion.--Eduard47 (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Why ?--Remontees (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Remontees: There is no Freedom of Panorama in France. This means that the copyright of any images of buildings whose architect has not been dead 70 years or more belong to the architect. --Elisfkc (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Not only a copyright violation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oNqZfkHDEk, but an ADVERT Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This is my picture and It is of no use Sek2016 (talk) 20:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- ??
Keep ?? @Sek2016: Hold on just a second: you are not the author and also not the uploader. (but seemingly you would be the girl pictured) And the image is part of a gallery on a user page. (User:VGrigas (WMF)) - Alexis Jazz 06:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: personality rights. Ruthven (msg) 17:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Photographer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.correiodopovo-al.com.br/index.php/noticia/2012/08/01/novo-supermercado-todo-dia-sera-construido-no-trevo-do-bom-jesus
Converted by me to DR, as the provided external hit is not convincing, because it was published 3 years later than our upload and has far lower resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: derived work from copyrighted material (the logo). Ruthven (msg) 17:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
trademark register, can not be issued in the cc, code mark TO2010C002316 of uibm http://www.uibm.gov.it/uibm/dati/ ZioNicco (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: too simple to be copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 17:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:28A6:784D:877:7222 as Copyvio (Copyvio)
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion whether this logo is above COM:TOO. I tend to say yes. Source-website claims "Derechos Reservados@ Televisa S.A. de C.V.". -- Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Túrelio. Ruthven (msg) 17:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ANIRBANB724 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works, small sizes without EXIFs, other uploads already speedy deleted
- File:CSP Annual Sports Day.png
- File:CSP Girls Shelter Home Celebration.png
- File:CSP Boys Tutorial Center.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Image quality is so bad that the subject (Chantal Lamarre) is not really recognizable, so the picture is not useful for any educational content. Boréal (talk) 21:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Actually the photo is in use. Ruthven (msg) 18:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unsharp + low resolution / better versions are available Geertivp (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unsharp + low resolution / better versions are available Geertivp (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose Halloween costume, contributors could use the photo. --Panam2014 (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I see no use for this image. There are better images of Halloween costumes already, and this one doesn't even show the whole costume. It looks like even the focus of the image is not the actual costume at all. JIP (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Panam2014. Ruthven (msg) 18:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://static.wixstatic.com/media/c14440_6810ea5968154f8db14ba3c9ba10a214~mv2_d_1736_2600_s_2.jpg/v1/fill/w_594,h_889,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/c14440_6810ea5968154f8db14ba3c9ba10a214~mv2_d_1736_2600_s_2.webp, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
I am sorry. I have uploaded the wrong file. I tried uploading it again but it is giving me an error saying its a duplicate. The one I am uploading is a different picture but it is uploading the old picture again. I would like to delete this picture and upload a new picture. Drmaisel (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Procedurally re-nominating this deletion request under my name, so this file can be evaluated on its own merit, and not based on the nominators status within the community. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep – Category: Gita Shahi has only three images, and two of them were subjected to the troll’s attack. What is wrong with this namely actress? Many of those have much more photos on Commons. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: apparently she is a Nepalese actress and model. In SCOPE. Ruthven (msg) 18:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Brianna Haley (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Procedurally re-nominating this deletion request under my name, so this file can be evaluated on its own merit, and not based on the nominators status within the community. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep – Category: Gita Shahi has only three images, and two of them were subjected to the troll’s attack. What is wrong with this namely actress? Many of those have much more photos on Commons. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: broken file. Ruthven (msg) 18:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Per Com:Toys, also several copyvios in uploader's contributions. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
It is not useful as there is another picture just like it. AyodeleA1 (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Made a mistake Upload the picture on the wrong place CGCSocialNetwork (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: you are not the uploader. Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refrigerador23 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no use, just simple text — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep, not a valid reason. You need to explain why simple text isn't going to be useful: simple text is often quite useful. Nyttend (talk) 06:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete, it's a clear case: The file ist just plain text, not used for any wikipage at all. Originally the file was created by Nemigo to illustrate a wikipage about the Spanish company "Astilleros y Talleres del Noroeste" (ASTANO). But as the company is abbreviated in upper-case letters only (ASTANO) and NOT in upper- and lower-case letters (Astano), the wrong logo is not in use any more and will not be used again. Thank you for deleting.--Refrigerador23 (talk) 08:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete, this explanation is conclusive. We have no need for logos that don't represent reality, and a piece of plain text doesn't need to be represented with an image that isn't the real logo. Nyttend (talk) 00:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Is this a joke? What is the conclusive explanation? Astano is the name of a company, part of its history. What do you mean, it's no longer used? Use it if you leave the admin that is vandalizing the page to be reused. I want to thank a user who has been on wikipedia for less than a week as a registered user for informing us all about what is no longer in use and its conclusive conclusions.--Nemigo galiza 20:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- OK, now the file is in use again. But it was not in use before... Sorry about that. But there are still two questions left: 1. Why do you create a logo of a company in plain text, which is in fact not the real logo of "Astilleros y Talleres del Noroeste"? 2. Why do you use a wrong abbreviation in upper- and lower-case letters (Astano) and not the correct abbreviation in upper-case letters (ASTANO)? Thank you and have a good day.--Refrigerador23 (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- And by the way: If this file means that much to you, Nemigo, I can live with it if we keep it. Even though I actually still think it should be deleted... As a compromise I could accept a new logo in upper-case letters only ("ASTANO").--Refrigerador23 (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- WTF? I don't know what you're talking about. The company name is written thus "Astano" was the trade mark of the company not "ASTANO". It had already made the name and logo of the company, as it was written in 1941. That mark was erased by an ex admin of wikipedia (twice) In the attached image of the Astano museum you can see to the right as it was written in the company. Please, you don't know anything about Astano. There are other sites where you can help
- And by the way: If this file means that much to you, Nemigo, I can live with it if we keep it. Even though I actually still think it should be deleted... As a compromise I could accept a new logo in upper-case letters only ("ASTANO").--Refrigerador23 (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
http://produccion.cultural.chacena.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/astano021.jpg --Nemigo galiza 21:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment The logo in upper- and lower-case letters (Astano) was really used in some places, you can see it here (in black), here (partially in blue), here (the two logos in white), and here. I don't know if it's the official logo or not, and if it's really in red or other color. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 17:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment Another one. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear all:
- As I already said: Yes, yes I know that the file is now in use again - thanks to Nemigo who used it again on a wikipage. But it was not in use before... As I already said: Sorry about that.
- And to make it very clear: The official name of that former shipbuilding company is and always was "Astilleros y Talleres del Noroeste", abbreviated "ASTANO" (again: it is a ABBREVIATION). But as Elisardojm proved with his pictures, it happened that both dictions have been used simultaneously, which in fact really means, that both "ASTANO" and "Astano" seem to be correct. Anyway: Even if we should decide to keep the file, I would strongly recommend, that in future on Wikipedia we prefer "ASTANO" to "Astano", because "Astano" is very mistakable. For example "Astano" is also the name (not just a abbreviation) of a Buddhist temple in Southeast Asia or the Name of a Town in Switzerland.
- Nevertheless I am still convinced that the file Nemigo created is not really the official logo and should thus be deleted.
Considering all these (partially new) facts I would still say: "In dubio pro reo." (In doubt, for the accused.)--Refrigerador23 (talk) 08:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
- in dubio... for workers (wikiusers)
- You can see this image? -> https://latri.ca/uploads/151795114479.jpg
- Is draw about Discoverer Enterprise (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discoverer_Enterprise) You can see name Astano? in official page for work --Nemigo galiza 21:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: file can be used, thus can be in scope. You can add {{Fact disputed}} to indicate a fictional logo. Ruthven (msg) 18:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Te file is a shield of a football club, so the rights obviously belong to the club, not to the uploader Leon saudanha (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution, close-up concert photo with no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Quite probably screenshot from YouTube. --Green Giant (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo without description, out of scope. Jcb (talk) 21:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- it was transfered from here: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/39_%D0%96%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%83 and will be used when uk.wiki file deleted. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 21:47, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File deleted on UKWP earlier today. --Green Giant (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:28A6:784D:877:7222 as Copyvio (copyvio) — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept, in my opinion this is simple logo. We have whole category:Telehit logos. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio. The file is not out of copyright in the US. -fireattack (talk) 08:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Meets the Threshold of originality. Martin K. (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep It's a simple font and fonts aren't copyrighted. COM:TOO --Ammazzavampiri (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
No authorshop information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. I did an extensive Google Images search, came up empty handed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Clearly from this photo session, band gives credit to Casey Holder. Flickr uploader is Delaney Gibson, making it Flickr washing. Source=https://www.instagram.com/p/Bdk5A4lFEWi/?taken-by=wearesigny Elisfkc (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment Fyunck(click) has said that they have proof of permission from both Delaney Gibson and Casey Holder (see User talk:Elisfkc#SIGNY pic). They have been informed to submit this proof through COM:OTRS. --Elisfkc (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- I don't recall saying I had proof other than messaging back and forth with the band, It was in the message that Delaney Gibson said Casey Holder was sitting next to her while they uploaded the photo to flickr. They must have had the original if the camera info was still there. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- OTRS wording says I shouldn't upload them anything if Flickr already has the proper licensing. I didn't upload the pic to Flickr... I just asked for a single photo. And OTR specifically says "e-mails from copyright holders wishing to allow Wikipedia to reuse their content (emails such as, "I allow Wikipedia to reuse my photos", etc.)" "are insufficient from a legal standpoint: we require a more-specific declaration of consent to accept your permission." So why would they accept a facebook messenger conversation? I can upload a screen print of the conversation, but would that really help? Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Another thing... with the OTR upload form the first box that comes up is where i choose "I don't know the copyright holder". It stops me cold and says "Wikimedia OTRS cannot accept a release from you – please reach out to the copyright holder instead." So I can't upload the conversation. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Should I ask the band to have Casey Holder upload the same photo to flickr once again, under his own name, using the same license they used before (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic)? Would that be better? Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: Email the conversation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, with a link to the file page. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: I will email them a screen print of the relevant conversation. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- I emailed it, though per the OTR page I don't see them considering it as much of anything since I don't represent the band in any way. We'll see. They'll probably look at the flickr page as their guide. Either way the backlog says it may take more than a month for them to check it out. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: I will email them a screen print of the relevant conversation. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: Email the conversation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, with a link to the file page. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Should I ask the band to have Casey Holder upload the same photo to flickr once again, under his own name, using the same license they used before (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic)? Would that be better? Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS, and it's been six weeks. Can be undeleted if permission is recieved. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)